DOCSLIB.ORG

By Alan Woods

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
By Alan Woods Alan Woods with Hugo Chávez ALAN WOODS was born in Swansea, South Wales, in 1944 into a working-class family with strong Communist traditions. At the age of 16 he joined the Young Socialists and became a Marxist. He studied Russian in Sussex University and later in Sofia (Bulgaria) and the Moscow State University (MGU). He has a wide expe- rience of the international labour movement and has been involved in the Marxist movement in Spain, where he participated in the struggle against the Franco dicta- torship, Latin America and Pakistan. He speaks several languages, including Spanish, French, German and Russian. Alan Woods is the author of many works covering a wide spectrum of issues (poli- tics, economics, history, philosophy, art, music, and science). He is also the politi- cal editor of the popular website In Defence of Marxism (www.marxist.com) and secretary of the International Marxist Tendency. Among the books he has written we can highlight Lenin and Trotsky: What they Really Stood For and Reason in Revolt, Marxist Philosophy and Modern Science, both in conjunction with the late Ted Grant, Bolshevism: the Road to Revolution, Marxism and the United States, The History of Philosophy (online), Ireland: Republicanism and Revolution, The Venezuelan Revolution - A Marxist perspective, and What is Marxism? (jointly with Rob Sewell and Mick Brooks). His books have been translated into several languages, including Spanish, Italian, German, Greek, Turkish, Urdu, Danish, Portuguese, Russian and Bahasa Indonesian. REFORMISM or REVOLUTION Marxism and socialism of the 21st century To the workers and peasants of Venezuela, the real protagonists of the Bolivarian Revolution and of this book. REFORMISM or REVOLUTION Marxism and socialism of the 21st century (Reply to Heinz Dieterich) By Alan Woods Wellred Publications London Reformism or Revolution Marxism and Socialism of the 21st century (Reply to Heinz Dieterich) By Alan Woods First published by Wellred 2008 Copyright © Alan Woods UK distribution: Wellred Books, PO Box 50525 London E14 6WG, England Tel: +44 (0) 207 515 7675 [email protected] USA distribution: Wellred, PO Box 4244, St. Paul, MN 55104 [email protected] Wellred on-line bookshop sales: wellred.marxist.com Typeset by Wellred Printed by intypelibra, London, England British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN - 13 978 1 900 007 33 7 ISBN - 10 1 900 007 33 9 Layout by Espe Espigares Contents Acknowledgements.................................................................9 Author’s Preface...................................................................11 1. Methodology.....................................................................15 2. Philosophy and science....................................................37 3. Dieterich and historical materialism................................77 4. History and economics...................................................107 5. Socialism utopian and scientific....................................137 6. An outline of Marxist economics...................................152 7. The economics of Socialism of the 21st Century..........187 8. Socialism or Stalinism? ..................................................223 9. The future of the Cuban Revolution .............................269 10. Nationalism or internationalism?................................ 313 11. The state and revolution...............................................331 12. The Venezuelan Revolution........................................ 367 Bibliography..................................................................411 Acknowledgements ver the past months I have received a lot of encouragement from many peo- ple who were keen to see this book in print. This was a great help to me, Osince I have more than once regretted having taken the task on in the first place. I hope that the final result will justify the work that so many people have put into it. I wish to express my thanks to all those who, by their painstaking work, have made the appearance of this book possible. In the first place, my thanks to Mick Brooks for his invaluable help with the section on economics and expert proof-reading, and to Harry Whittacker, Jordi Martorell and Fred Weston, for their proof-reading and valuable suggestions. I must also thank Harry Nielsen, Luke Wilson and Alex Grant for their helpful observations on the chapter on science. In addition, I would like to thank Espe Espigares for her professional layout. Since we decided to publish the book simultaneously in English and Spanish, I would also like to thank Juana Cobo and Pablo Roldán for the excellent Spanish translation. In addition, a special mention is due to Miguel Fernández, whose con- siderable literary skills were of great help to me in perfecting and polishing the final text both in Spanish and English. Above all, my heartfelt thanks to my comrade and companion Ana Muñoz for her invaluable help and encouragement, and for her immense patience in the final proofreading, which was enough to try the patience of a saint! Author's preface he publication of the present work requires some explanation. Many friends have asked me why I was taking so much time replying to a man whose Tbooks are read by a limited public, mainly in the Latin American universities, and are mostly only available in Spanish. I replied that I had been persuaded by the persistent requests of my friends in Cuba and Venezuela, who, after some years, were fed up of the theoretical pretensions of Heinz Dieterich and wanted me to answer him. For some years Heinz Dieterich has been waging a noisy campaign, claiming that he has “invented” the idea of Socialism in the 21st Century. This has had some effect on certain circles of the Left in Venezuela and some other countries. As we know, there is an important debate taking place in Venezuela on the nature of social- ism, inspired by Hugo Chávez’s declarations in favour of socialism. This is enormously important, not only for Venezuela but for the whole interna- tional workers’ movement. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, there is a ferment of discussion on the Left on a world scale. The ignominious failure of Stalinism and the unprecedented ideological counteroffensive of the bourgeoisie against socialism have led some to conclude that the “old” ideas of Marxism (scientific socialism) are no longer valid, and that it is necessary to invent something entirely new and orig- inal. This is just what Dieterich claims to have done. During the referendum campaign on constitutional reform in December 2007 the name of Heinz Dieterich suddenly began to acquire greater prominence. He opposed the reform and publicly defended General Baduel, the former Defence Minister who went over to the opposition and campaigned for a “no” vote in the ref- erendum. Later, Dieterich said he supported a “yes” vote “as a lesser evil”. How does it come about that a man who has cultivated the image of a loyal sup- porter of Chávez and the Bolivarian Revolution should behave in such a way? It came as a shock to many on the Left who had accepted uncritically the audacious claims of Professor Dieterich. But, having carefully read his articles and books for many months, it was not at all surprising to me. 12 Reformism or Revolution The fact that in a decisive moment Heinz Dieterich took a position that was clearly against the further advance of the Revolution towards socialism is no acci- dent. It is the logical and inescapable conclusion from all his theories and from his peculiar version of “21st Century Socialism” – a kind of “socialism” that is not socialism at all, as we shall see. From Anti-Dühring to Anti-Dieterich In preparing my reply I decided to re-read Engels’ famous book Anti-Dühring, in which he answers the arguments of a man who, more than a century ago, claimed to have developed a new and original theory of socialism that would render the ideas of Marx (and everybody else) obsolete. I found that the similarity between Dühring and Dieterich to be astonishingly similar, not only in their ideas but even in their way of expressing them. The first words of its preface are: “The following work is by no means the fruit of any ‘inner urge’. On the contrary.” Like Engels, I had no wish to write the pres- ent book. I agreed reluctantly because I regarded it as an unwelcome distraction from other important work. I thought, rather naively as it turns out, that I could deal with this very quickly. But I was wrong. The more I penetrated into this thick jun- gle of convoluted prose and even more convoluted ideas, the more it became clear to me that a short reply was impossible. The more I wrote the more I kept thinking of the words of Engels in the Preface to Anti-Dühring: “Nevertheless it was a year before I could make up my mind to neglect other work and get my teeth into this sour apple. It was the kind of apple that, once bitten into, had to be completely devoured; and it was not only very sour, but also very large. The new socialist theory was presented as the ultimate practical fruit of a new philosophical system. It was therefore necessary to examine it in the context of this system, and in doing so to examine the system itself; it was necessary to follow Herr Dühring into that vast territory in which he dealt with all things under the sun and with some others as well.” 1 The writings of Heinz Dieterich are an even bigger and sourer apple than the one old Engels had to bite on. Like Herr Dühring, Heinz Dieterich writes on many sub- jects and, since he constantly mixes everything up, I was obliged to follow him through all these twists and turns. He seems to be incapable of writing about polit- ical economy without dragging in the history of philosophy, or the perspectives for the Bolivian Revolution without speculating on the nature of the universe. The present book is therefore intended to do two things: to answer the ideas of Heinz Dieterich and also to explain as clearly as possible the classical ideas of Marxism, which in every respect contradict them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Non-Christian Nature of Marxism
    The Non-Christian Nature of Marxism Andrew T. Looker, Jr. HSOG Culture and Crisis Conference Liberty University March 6, 2021 I am from Charlotte, North Carolina. I graduated from Liberty University in May 2020 with a Bachelor of Science Degree in U.S. Government, with a concentration in Politics and Policy. I also graduated with a minor in History. I am currently in my second semester of studies in the Master of Arts in Public Policy program. Introduction Marxism is one of the most impactful philosophies in the history of mankind. It refers to the political and economic theories formulated by Karl Marx, a German philosopher who lived from 1818 to 1883. Marx’s most well-known works include the Communist Manifesto (1848) and Das Kapital (1859). Marxism initially consisted of the three related ideas of a philosophical anthropology, a theory of history, and a radical economic and political program.1 More specifically, Marx claimed that capitalism is just one stage in the historical progression from inferior economic systems to superior ones. Marx held that every society throughout history has been divided into different social classes which drive conflict. Within the capitalist framework, Marx claimed that society consisted of two classes: the bourgeoisie, or the business class who control the means of production, and the proletariat, or the workers whose labor produces valuable economic goods. In Marx’s view, the bourgeoisie profit at the expense of the proletariat, who they exploit by means of low wages and poor working conditions. As the political and economic inequalities between the upper and working classes continue to grow, Marx predicted that the proletariat would increasingly become alienated from capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • A Post-Capitalist, Post-Stalinist Social Democracy: Hungary 1956 and 1990
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 11 Issue 2 Article 3 1991 A Post-Capitalist, Post-Stalinist Social Democracy: Hungary 1956 and 1990 Leslie A. Muray Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Eastern European Studies Commons, and the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Muray, Leslie A. (1991) "A Post-Capitalist, Post-Stalinist Social Democracy: Hungary 1956 and 1990," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 11 : Iss. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol11/iss2/3 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. · .. , A POST-CAPITALIST, POST-STALINIST SOCIAL DEMOCRACY: HUNGARY 1956 and 1990 by Leslie A. Muray Dr. Leslie A, Muray (Episcopalian) is a professor at Lansing Community College in Michigan. Born in Hungary, he came to the U.S.A. as a young boy. He received his Ph.D. degree at Claremont Graduate Theogical School in California. He is the editor of the C.A.R.E.E. Newsletter on the Christian-Marxist Encounter. This paper presented at the "Marxism and Religion" seminar, at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Religion, November 19, 1990. It is rather commonplace to hear that there is no tradition of democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Focusing on resources provided by history, religion, and certain aspects of Marxist thought for the construction of a non-capitalist, post-Stalinist society in the country of the author's birth, Hungary, I hope to dispel this Western European and North American stereotype in this essay.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Remembering Marx's Secularism* Scholars Engaged in the Critique Of
    Remembering Marx’s Secularism* Scholars engaged in the critique of secularism have struggled with the numerous meanings of the secular and its cognates, such as secularism, secularization, and secularity. Seeking coherence in the secular’s semantic excess, they have often elided distinctions between these meanings or sought a more basic concept of the secular that can contain all of its senses (Asad 2003; Taylor 2007; see Weir 2015). Numerous scholars have observed strong similarities between secularism and Protestantism (Fessenden 2007; Modern 2011; Yelle 2013; see McCrary and Wheatley 2017), at times echoing a Christian theological tradition that has long been anti-secular (Taylor 2007; Gregory 2012; see Reynolds 2016). Unlike this anti-secular tradition, the strongest version of the critique of secularism is a critique of the conditions that produce a distinction between secular and religious and a critique of the ways that empire benefits from this distinction. Overcoming a tidy separation between secularism and religion requires fracturing both and reassembling them in new ways that allow messy life to exceed governance (Hurd 2015, 122- 27). Remembering Karl Marx’s secularism provides an opportunity to recover the differences within secularism and its difference from Christianity, but also its odd similarities with religion. This recovery can help refine the critique of secularism and preserve some important tools for improving material conditions. * Joseph Blankholm, Department of Religious Studies, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA. E-mail: [email protected]. I owe thanks to several PhD students at the University of California, Santa Barbara for their valuable insights and feedback, including Matthew Harris, as well as the students in my seminar on materialism: Timothy Snediker, Lucas McCracken, Courtney Applewhite, and Damian Lanahan-Kalish.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of the Militant Tendency
    18 August 1982 Marxism Today Witch-hunts are the last thing the Labour Party needs: yet the politics of Militant are a blind alley for the Left. John Callaghan The Politics of the Militant Tendency The recent decision by the Labour Party open debate. If the ideology and political Socialist Fight was replaced by The Militant National Executive Committee to establish practice of the Militant Tendency are char­ in 1963; but, more fundamentally, from a register of organised groups within the acterised by major shortcomings they will being an integrated group of entrists in ranks of the party is generally acknowledged not be any less significant merely because 1955, the Revolutionary Socialist League to be a move against the Militant Tendency. the Labour Right draws attention to them gradually gave way to the much looser form It is possible that this decision may, by Sep­ while the Left remains silent. which is today's Militant Tendency. This tember, result in the expulsion of leading consists of a small centralised leadership figures from the group. The Labour Party Origins and nature echelon around Ted Grant, who control and has on many previous occasions taken such of the Militant Tendency1 own The Militant, supported by the bulk of repressive action against dissident — espe­ The Militant Tendency originated with a the Labour Party Young Socialist organ- cially Marxist — factions within the party tiny group of Trotskyists led by Ted Grant. istion and those who are prepared to sell the and its youth section. But the extraordinary From the mid-50s this group — known as newspaper in the parent organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis of Pabloism
    The Road from the SWP to Trotskyism . .. page 2 The Faces of Economism ... page 24 NUMBER 21 FALL 1972 25 CENTS I Tile SWP tint! tile Fourtll Interntltiontl/, 1946-54: Genesis of Pabloism The American Socialist Workers Party and the European Military Policy" which called for military training under, Pabloists travelled at different rates along different paths to trade union control, implicitly posing the utopian idea that revisionism, to converge in uneasy alliance in the early 1960's U.S. workers could fight German fascism without the in an unprincipled "reunification," which has now broken existence of a workers state in the U.S., through "control­ down as the American SWP has completed the transition ling" U.S. imperialism's army. British Trotskyist Ted Grant from Pabloist centrism to outright reformism. The "United went even further, in one speech referring to British Secretariat" which issued out of the 1963 "reunification" imperialism's armed forces as "our Eighth Army." The teeters on the edge of an open split; the "anti-revisionist" German IKD returned to outright Menshevism with the "International Committee" fractured last year. The collapse the'ory that fascism had brought about the need for "an of the various competing pretenders to the mantle of the intermediate stage fundamentally equivalent to a democratic Fourth International provides a crucial opportunity for the revolution." ("Three Theses;' 19 October 1941) reemergence of an authentic Trotskyist international tenden­ The French Trotskyist movement, fragmented during the cy. Key to the task of reconstructing the Fourth Internation­ course of the war, was the best example of the contradiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Sing 2018 Tempestuous Affair.Pdf
    Muslims and Capitalism – An Uneasy Relationship? Edited by Béatrice Hendrich KULTUR, RECHT UND POLITIK IN MUSLIMISCHEN GESELLSCHAFTEN Herausgegeben von Thomas Bauer, Stephan Conermann, Sabine Damir-Geilsdorf, Gudrun Krämer, Anke von Kügelgen, Eva Orthmann, Anja Pistor-Hatam, Irene Schneider, Reinhard Schulze Band 39 ERGON VERLAG Muslims and Capitalism – An Uneasy Relationship? Edited by Béatrice Hendrich ERGON VERLAG Gedruckt mit freundlicher Unterstützung der Fritz Thyssen Stiftung, Köln Umschlagabbildung: Claudia Bülbül, Feldforschung 2014, AKM Şura, Ort: KA-MU-DER Vakfı Fatih İstanbul Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. © Ergon – ein Verlag in der Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden 2018 Das Werk einschließlich aller seiner Teile ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Jede Verwertung außerhalb des Urheberrechtsgesetzes bedarf der Zustimmung des Verlages. Das gilt insbesondere für Vervielfältigungen jeder Art, Übersetzungen, Mikroverfilmungen und für Einspeicherungen in elektronische Systeme. Gedruckt auf alterungsbeständigem Papier. Umschlaggestaltung: Jan von Hugo Satz: Thomas Breier www.ergon-verlag.de ISBN 978-3-95650-463-1 (Print) ISBN 978-3-95650-464-8 (ePDF) ISSN 1863-9801 Table of Contents Béatrice Hendrich Introduction: Exalting the Past, Rebelling against the Present, and Struggling for a (Better) Future? ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Of Ernst Bloch Michael Löwy
    C The Principle of Hope from Ernst Bloch is undoubtedly one C R R I of the major works of emancipatory thought in the twentieth century. I Romanticism, Marxism S Monumental (more than 1600 pages), it occupied the author for a large S I I S part of his life.Written during his exile in United States, from 1938 to S 1947, it would be reviewed for the first time in 1953 and a second in & & and Religion in the 1959. Following his condemnation as “revisionist” by authorities of the C C R German Democratic Republic, the author eventually left East Germany R I in 1961. I “Principle of Hope” of T T I Nobody had ever written a book like this, stirring in the same I Q breath the visionary pre-Socratic and Hegelian alchemy, the new Q U U Ernst Bloch E Hoffmann, the serpentine heresy and messianism of Shabbataï Tsevi, E Schelling’s philosophy of art, Marxist materialism, Mozart’s operas V V O and the utopias of Fourier. Open a page at random: it is about the man O L. L. 2 of Renaissance, the concept of (material) substance in Parecelse and 2 Jakob Böhme, of the Holy Family in Marx, of the doctrine of knowledge I I S in Giordano Bruno and the book on the Reform of Knowledge of S S Spinoza. The erudition of Bloch is so encyclopedic that very few readers S Michael Löwy U U E are capable of judging the entirety of each theme developed in the three E #1 volumes of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxismo Y Religión: ¿Opio Del Pueblo?**
    Michael Löwy* Marxismo y religión: ¿opio del pueblo?** ¿ES AÚN LA RELIGIÓN, tal como Marx y Engels la entendían en el siglo XIX, un baluarte de reacción, oscurantismo y conservadurismo? Brevemente, sí, lo es. Su punto de vista se aplica aún a muchas institu- ciones católicas (el Opus Dei es sólo el ejemplo más obvio), al uso fun- damentalista corriente de las principales confesiones (cristiana, judía, musulmana), a la mayoría de los grupos evangélicos (y su expresión en la denominada “iglesia electrónica”), y a la mayoría de las nuevas sectas religiosas, algunas de las cuales, como la notoria iglesia del reverendo Moon, son nada más que una hábil combinación de manipulaciones financieras, lavado de cerebro y anticomunismo fanático. Sin embargo, la emergencia del cristianismo revolucionario y de la teología de la liberación en América Latina (y en otras partes) abre un capítulo histórico y alza nuevas y excitantes preguntas que no pueden responderse sin una renovación del análisis marxista de la religión. Inicialmente, confrontados con tal fenómeno, los marxistas recu- rrirían a un modelo tradicional que concibe a la iglesia como un cuerpo reaccionario enfrentando a los trabajadores y los campesinos cristianos * Filósofo y director de investigación del Centro Nacional de Investigación Científica de Francia, CNRS. ** Traducción de Bárbara Schijman. Revisión de Michael Löwy. 281 La teoría marxista hoy que podrían haber sido considerados soportes de la revolución. Incluso mucho tiempo después, la muerte del Padre Camilo Torres Restrepo, quien se había unido a la guerrilla colombiana, fue considerada un caso excepcional. Corría el año 1966. Pero el creciente compromiso de los cristianos –incluidos muchos religiosos y curas– con las luchas popula- res y su masiva inserción en la revolución sandinista claramente mos- traron la necesidad de un nuevo enfoque.
    [Show full text]
  • Week School on Political Issues from the History of AWL
    Week school on political issues from the history of AWL Day One Session: Heterodox, orthodox, and “orthodox Mark 2” 1. Why we started: 1966-8 Trotskyism: http://www.workersliberty.org//taxonomy/term/555 http://www.workersliberty.org/wwaawwmb The AWL's tradition: http://www.workersliberty.org/node/5146 Session: Party and perspectives What happened in 1968 and how the left responded ***************** Why we fused with IS (SWP) Timeline 2. Ireland: 1968-71 1964 July 2: After years of civil rights agitation in USA, Civil Rights http://www.workersliberty.org/node/10010 Act becomes law. October 15: Labour wins general election, after 13 years of Session: The debates in 1969 - “withdraw subsidies”, Tory rule “southern arsenals”, “troops out” before August 1969, “Catholic economism” and transitional demands, “troops out” 1965 in August 1969. January 31: USA starts bombing of North Vietnam. Vietnam war, and movement against it, escalate. Day Two February: SLL, then biggest revolutionary group in Britain, launches its own independent "Young Socialists" as a 3. The Tories and Labour 1970-4 response to limited expulsions by Labour Party after SLL wins majority in Labour youth movement. Session: General strike Our Labour Party debate then: syndicalism, economism, and 1966 politics Summer: Beginning of "Cultural Revolution" in China: a faction of the bureaucracy mobilises gangs to purge rivals 4. Stalinism 1968-75 reinforce autarkic, ultra-statist policy. But many leftists in the West will admire the "Cultural Revolution"; Maoism will Session: Czechoslovakia 1968 be a big force on the revolutionary left from 1968 to the “Soviet dissidents” mid-70s, though less so in Britain than in other European Vietnam and Cambodia 1975 countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Parallelism Between Traditional Socialism and Socialism of the 21St Century Under the Figure of Rafael Correa”
    FACULTY OF LAW School of International Studies “ANALYSIS OF THE PARALLELISM BETWEEN TRADITIONAL SOCIALISM AND SOCIALISM OF THE 21ST CENTURY UNDER THE FIGURE OF RAFAEL CORREA” GRADUATE THESIS PRIOR TO OBTAINING A BILINGUAL BACHELOR IN INTERNATIONAL STUDIES MINOR IN FOREIGN TRADE AUTHOR: GABRIELA CAMPOVERDE DIRECTOR: AB. ANA MARÍA BUSTOS CUENCA - ECUADOR 2017 i Dedication This thesis work is mainly dedicated to my son who has been my main motivation to finish with this goal, as well as my family and my boyfriend who have supported and helped me at all times throughout this journey. ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my family, my son and above all my parents who, despite the difficulties, have supported me at all times to achieve this goal. I would also like to thank my director, Ana María Bustos, who has guided me, in a timely manner and with a great deal of patience, in the culmination of this work. And a special thanks to my boyfriend Alvaro Abad and my sisters Samantha and Emily who have helped me unconditionally and motivated me to finally reach this goal. iii Table of Contents Dedication ......................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................ iii Table of Contents .............................................................................................................. iv List of Tables and Figures .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Hansen Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf78700585 No online items Register of the Joseph Hansen papers Finding aid prepared by Joseph Hansen Hoover Institution Archives 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA, 94305-6003 (650) 723-3563 [email protected] © 1998, 2006, 2012 Register of the Joseph Hansen 92035 1 papers Title: Joseph Hansen papers Date (inclusive): 1887-1980 Collection Number: 92035 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 109 manuscript boxes, 1 oversize box, 3 envelopes, 1 audio cassette(46.2 linear feet) Abstract: Speeches and writings, correspondence, notes, minutes, reports, internal bulletins, resolutions, theses, printed matter, sound recording, and photographs relating to Leon Trotsky, activities of the Socialist Workers Party in the United States, and activities of the Fourth International in Latin America, Western Europe and elsewhere. Physical Location: Hoover Institution Archives Creator: Hansen, Joseph, Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Archives. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Joseph Hansen papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Archives. Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Archives in 1992. Accruals Materials may have been added to the collection since this finding aid was prepared. To determine if this has occurred, find the collection in Stanford University's online catalog at http://searchworks.stanford.edu . Materials have been added to the collection if the number of boxes listed in the online catalog is larger than the number of boxes listed in this finding aid.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya, Anti-Imperialism, and the Socialist Party
    Published on Workers' Liberty (http://www.workersliberty.org) Libya, anti-imperialism, and the Socialist Party By Sean Matgamna This is a copy-edited and slightly expanded version of the text printed in WL 3/34 Libya, anti-imperialism, and the Socialist Party Did Taaffe equate the Libyan rebels with the Nicaraguan contras? [3] Anything other than "absolute opposition" means support? [4] Intellectual hooliganism and AWL's "evasions" [5] What is more important in the situation than stopping massacre? [6] Bishop Taaffe and imperialism [7] What is the "anti-imperialist" programme in today's world? [8] From semi-colony to regional power [9] Taaffe's record as an anti-imperialist [10] The separation of AWL and the Socialist Party [11] Militant in the mid 1960s [12] How did we come to break with Militant? Anti-union laws [13] What is a Marxist perspective? [14] Peaceful revolution [15] Our general critique of Militant's politics [16] "We can't discuss what Grant and Taaffe can't reply to" [17] The US in Iraq and union freedoms [18] Socialists and the European Union [19] Toadying to Bob Crow [20] Ireland: why socialists must have a democratic programme [21] Conclusion: Pretension [22] Appendix: Militant and the Labour Party, 1969-87 - a strange symbiosis [23] What We Are And What We Must Become: critique of Militant, written in 1966, which became the founding document of the AWL tendency, is available at http://www.workersliberty.org/wwaawwmb The RSL (Militant) in the 1960s: a study of passivity: an account of how What We Are And What We Must Become came to be written, and the battle around its ideas.
    [Show full text]