Geothermal Systems of the Yellowstone Caldera Field Trip Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geothermal Systems of the Yellowstone Caldera Field Trip Guide DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency Thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. 3 , GEOTHERMAL SYSTEt6 OF THE YELLOWSTONE CALDERA GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES COUNCIL September 6, 7, 8, 1980 Field Trip Guide 1 J Duncan Foley I Dennis L. Nielson Clayton R. Nichols 0 1Earth Science Laboratory 2Depa rtment of €ne rgy University of Utah Research Institute Division of Geotheml Energy Salt Lake City, UT Idaho Falls, ID d J 0 c TABLE CONTENTS 0. OF Page INTRODUCTION ............................ 1 DAY 1 WEST YELLOWSTONE TO CANYON ................ 4 W Virginia Cascades .................. 12 DunravenPass .................... 15 Canyon ....................... 16 Sour Creek Dome Overlook .............. 18 Nud Volcano ..................... 19 u DAY 2 CANYON TO OLD FAITHFUL .................. 22 Calcite Springs ................... 24 Mammoth ....................... 29 Roaring Mountain .................. 32 Norris ....................... 32 )I DAY 3 OLD FAITHFUL TO WEST YELLOWSTONE ............. 35 Upper Geyser Basin ................. 37 Fountain Paint Pots ................. 37 Firehole River Drive ................ 39 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................... 40 ylr REFERENCESCITEO 41 TABLES 10 1 Geologic and Surficial Geologic Map References ...... 3 2 Age Estimates for Glacial Activity in Yellowstone .... 5 3 Chemical Analyses of Yellowstone Waters ......... 20 i Drilling results, Upper Geyser Basin and Vicinity 36 SQ 4 . FIGURES 1 Field Trip Route Map ................... 2 0 2 Diagrammatic relations among Quaternary volcanic units . 6 3 Hypothetical cross section, showing relationships of vent and alluvial facies rocks .............. 17 4 Hypothetical cross section showing facies relationships 0 of two vent complexes .................. 17 I 5 Sectidn through Norris Basin drill holes ......... 34 c, The starting point for this road log is the west entrance to Yellowstone National Park. To reach the entrance from the West Yellowstone Airport, drive out of the airport, turn right (south) on Hwy. 287, and proceed to the stop sign near the old railroad station (which is now a museum). Turn left (east) at this intersection, and proceed to the entrance. Daily routes and stops are outlined in Figure 1 u Geothermal studies are proceeding on two fronts in the West Yellowstone area. High-temperature resources for the generation of electricity are being sought in the Island Park area, and lower temperature resources for direct I applications, primarily space heating, are being explored for near the town of West Ye1 1owstone . u Potential electric geothermal development in the Island Park area has been the subject of widespread publicity over fears of damage to thermal features in Yellowstone Park, At the time of writing this guide (June, 1980), companies have applied for geothermal leases in the Island Park area, but these leases have not yet been granted by the U, S. Forest Service. The c, Senate is now discussing a bill that would regulate geothermal development in Island Park; outcome of this debate will determine the course of action on the 1ease appl i cati ons The Island Park area was the site of two cycles of caldera activity, with major eruptions at 2.0 and 1.2 million years ago. The U.S. Geological Survey (Smith and others, 1978) estimates that 16,850 x 1018 joules of energy may remain in the system. Geothermal resources suitable for direct applications are being sought in the West Yellowstone vicinity by the Montana Bureau of Mnes and Geology, under funding from the U. S. Department of Energy. West Yellowstone has a Q mean annual temperature of 1-20C. Research thus far suggests that basement rocks in the vicinity am at a depth of about 600 m and are probably similar to the rocks exposed north of Hebgen Lake, where Precambrian, Paleozoic and Mesozoic rocks have been mapped. A few sites with anomalously warm water have been identified near the town. Work is continuing on this project. 4w Our fi nt stop will be at Vi rginfa Cascades, about 30 miles east of the park entrance. Along this drive, there will be time to look at The Geologic Story of Yellowstone National Park (Keefer, 1971).and the geologic map of the park (U.S.G.S., 1972a), which are contained in this packet. A few copies of , the surficial geologic map (U.S.G.S., 1972b) are also available for viewing. An article on the volcanic evolution of Yellowstone (Christiansen, unpub.) 1s in your packet. Geoghysical data and interpretations for the Yellowstone area as are presented in the report from Scientific American (Smith and Christiansen, 19801, which is also contained in your packet. The road log is adapted primarily from U. S. Geological Survey Geologic and Surficial Geologic quadrangle mapping. Lithologic 'and outcrop descrip- tions have been drawn from these maps, To avoid repetitious citation of ad sources, Table 1 has been included in this log to allow readers to consult the original sources. Quotations not from map texts are referenced in the traditional manner, 1 I iv i . 1yJ W Roosevelt To Cook8 J To 80281 To Quake( Y Y 8 '; L., FIGURE 1 GEOTHERMAL RESOUUCES COUNClL YELLOWSTONE CALOEUA FIELD TRIP * SEPTEMBEP 88 1980 A Geologic and Surfici a1 Geologic Map References w MILES QUADRANGLE BEDROCK SURF ICI AL NAME a1 1 USGS 1972a Y --- Day 1 0a0-4a1 West Yellowstone -0- Wal drop, 1975a b' 6.0-19-4 Madison Junction Christiansen and Blank, 1974a Waldrop and Pierce, 1975 20.7-38.4 Norris Junction Christiansen, 1975 Richmond and Waldrop, 1975 39.4-40.4 Canyon Village Christiansen and Blank, 1975 Richmond 1977 '0 41.0-48.0 Tower Junction Prostka and others, 1975 Pierce, 1974 49.4-72 .6 Canyon Vi11 age see above see above Day 2 e 5-24 -0 Tower Junction above see above 24.0-55.2 Mammoth --- Pierce, 1973 59.3-67.1 Norris Junction see above see above 0 68.4-86.9 Madison Junction see above see above 86.9-89.7 Old Faithful Chri st iansen and B1 ank , 1974b Wal drop 1975b quDay 3 0-2 Old Faithful see above see above ~ -9 I 2.9-27 -8 Madison Junction see above see above 27 -8-33.8 West Ye1 1owstone --- see above tu I 3 10 Potassium-Argon dates reported in this guide were calculated using pre-1977 decay constants. To compare with more recent dating, multiply the 0 dates given herein by 1.025. I Glacial activity has been sepa ed into Bull Lake and Pinedale times Estimates for the ages of the ice are.given in Table 2. DAY 1 - WEST YELLOWSTONE TO CANYON I Distance Cumulative I Mi 1 eage 1 0 0 t the west entrance to the Pa s a1 1uvial gravel ly sand, deposited in 'U the Pinedale-Bull Lake interglacial interval in the West Ye1 1owstone Basi n. i # The tremendous umber of dead pine trees in this area is due to n infestation of the Mountain Pine Beetle, which 11s the trees by cutting the w circulation of sap. Many trees in the Island Park area to the south have been killed by the beetle, and the infestation is now moving northeast into tone National Park. 2 illustrates the relations among the .w. Quaternory volcsnic units in the park. it is not comprehensive, the figuE does trate some of the more important stratig I re1 ati ons . I Nore than 10,000 thermal features have been ,o catalogued within Yellowstone Park. In addition to the heat phenomena associated with hot springs and geysers, the waters have a beneficial effect i- of i nc reasi ng aquat i c product i vi ty The Mad1 son and Fi =hole rivers have some of the best t rout fishing in the country. Many of the streams in 42 the Park have normal productivity upstream fmm thermal features, but support a wider variety of aquatic life after the hot waters have mixed with the river waters. There are also a few sites where the opposite effect is true, thermal springs reduce st ream p roducti vity y3 Yellowstone is an area of general high elevation and high precipitation. This implies that, especially for areas to the west and south, it is an area of regional groundwater recharge. 2 02 2 02 The Madison River is visible on the north side of W the highway. The river here flows along outwash sand and gravel from Pinedale glaciers. Pinedale outwash fans form the deposits away from the TABLE 2 Age estimates for Glacial Activity in Yellowstone (in thousands of years) PSL Shomhone Loke tutf MembertO.lB) POC Obmldlon Creek Member Seuond voloonlo oytlo MP Meso folts tuff t1.Z) PML Motlard Loke Mernber(O.6- 0.83) OI TN Sediments ondimsotts PUB Upper Bomln Memom (0.6-0.53) ot Tho Norrowe (1.6) OS Osprey Borolt LEC Lewl@Cowon Rkyollte MR Madison River Basolt flr.1 voloonlooycle HR Huckldbetry Rldae Tuff (2.0) SLF Swan ~okePlot eosait BC Rhyolte of Brood Creek FR Follm Rlver Bosolt JB dunctlon Butte Boeolt(2.0) ML Bosolt of Morlpoma Loko LAC Lava Creek futf (0.6) UF Undlne Folle Boeolt (to.?) MJ Mount Jockson Rhyolite (0.79-0.64) FIGURE 2.
Recommended publications
  • Yellowstone Grizzly Bear Investigations 2008
    Yellowstone Grizzly Bear Investigations 2008 Report of the Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team Photo courtesy of Steve Ard Data contained in this report are preliminary and subject to change. Please obtain permission prior to citation. To give credit to authors, please cite the section within this report as a chapter in a book. Below is an example: Moody, D.S., K. Frey, and D. Meints. 2009. Trends in elk hunter numbers within the Primary Conservation Area plus the 10-mile perimeter area. Page 39 in C.C. Schwartz, M.A. Haroldson, and K. West, editors. Yellowstone grizzly bear investigations: annual report of the Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team, 2008. U.S. Geological Survey, Bozeman, Montana, USA. Cover: Female #533 with her 3 3-year-old offspring after den emergence, taken 1 May 2008 by Steve Ard. YELLOWSTONE GRIZZLY BEAR INVESTIGATIONS Annual Report of the Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team 2008 U.S. Geological Survey Wyoming Game and Fish Department National Park Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks U.S. Forest Service Idaho Department of Fish and Game Edited by Charles C. Schwartz, Mark A. Haroldson, and Karrie West U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 2009 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 This Report ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of Water Temperature and Flow at Tantalus Creek During Calendar Year 2005, Norris Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming
    Systematics of Water Temperature and Flow at Tantalus Creek During Calendar Year 2005, Norris Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5234 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 This report and any updates to it are available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2007/5234/ For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS — the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Clor, L., Lowenstern, J., Heasler, H, 2007, Systematics of water temperature and flow at Tantalus Creek during calendar year 2005, Norris Geyser Basin, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigation Report 2007-5234. Cataloging-in-publication data are on file with the Library of Congress (http://www.loc.gov/). Produced in the Western Region, Menlo Park, California Manuscript approved for publication, August 28, 2007 Text edited by James W. Hendley II Layout by David R. Jones FRONT COVER—Tantalus Creek collects nearly all the thermal water discharged at the Norris Geyser Basin, pictured below.
    [Show full text]
  • Related Magmatism in the Upper Wind River Basin, Wyoming (USA), GEOSPHERE; V
    Research Paper THEMED ISSUE: Cenozoic Tectonics, Magmatism, and Stratigraphy of the Snake River Plain–Yellowstone Region and Adjacent Areas GEOSPHERE The leading wisps of Yellowstone: Post–ca. 5 Ma extension- related magmatism in the upper Wind River Basin, Wyoming (USA), GEOSPHERE; v. 14, no. 1 associated with the Yellowstone hotspot tectonic parabola doi:10.1130/GES01553.1 Matthew E. Brueseke1, Anna C. Downey1, Zachary C. Dodd1, William K. Hart2, Dave C. Adams3, and Jeff A. Benowitz4 12 figures; 2 tables; 1 supplemental file 1Department of Geology, Kansas State University, 108 Thompson Hall, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA 2Department of Geology and Environmental Earth Science, Miami University, 118C Shideler Hall, Oxford, Ohio 45056, USA 3Box 155, Teton Village, Wyoming 83025, USA CORRESPONDENCE: brueseke@ ksu .edu 4Geophysical Institute and Geochronology Laboratory, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, USA CITATION: Brueseke, M.E., Downey, A.C., Dodd, Z.C., Hart, W.K., Adams, D.C., and Benowitz, J.A., 2018, The leading wisps of Yellowstone: Post–ca. 5 Ma ABSTRACT the issue of linking volcanic events to a specific driving mechanism (Fouch, extension-related magmatism in the upper Wind River 2012; Kuehn et al., 2015). Complicating matters, magmatism often continues Basin, Wyoming (USA), associated with the Yellow- The upper Wind River Basin in northwest Wyoming (USA) is located ~80– long after (e.g., millions of years) the upper plate has been translated away stone hotspot tectonic parabola: Geosphere, v. 14, no. 1, p. 74–94, doi:10.1130/GES01553.1. 100 km southeast of the Yellowstone Plateau volcanic field. While the upper from an upwelling plume (Bercovici and Mahoney, 1994; Sleep, 2003; Shervais Wind River Basin is a manifestation of primarily Cretaceous to Eocene Lara- and Hanan, 2008; Jean et al., 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document Overview Yellowstone National Park Wyoming, Montana, Idaho
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Overview Yellowstone National Park Wyoming, Montana, Idaho Contact Information For more information about the Yellowstone National Park Foundation Document, contact: [email protected] or 307-344-7381 or write to: Superintendent, Yellowstone National Park, PO Box 168, Yellowstone National Park, WY 82190-0168 Park Description Yellowstone became the world’s first national park on March This vast landscape contains the headwaters of several major 1, 1872, set aside in recognition of its unique hydrothermal rivers. The Firehole and Gibbon rivers unite to form the Madison, features and for the benefit and enjoyment of the people. which, along with the Gallatin River, joins the Jefferson to With this landmark decision, the United States Congress create the Missouri River several miles north of the park. The created a path for future parks within this country and Yellowstone River is a major tributary of the Missouri, which around the world; Yellowstone still serves as a global then flows via the Mississippi to the Gulf of Mexico. The Snake resource conservation and tourism model for public land River arises near the park’s south boundary and joins the management. Yellowstone is perhaps most well-known for its Columbia to flow into the Pacific. Yellowstone Lake is the largest hydrothermal features such as the iconic Old Faithful geyser. lake at high altitude in North America and the Lower Yellowstone The park encompasses 2.25 million acres, or 3,472 square Falls is the highest of more than 40 named waterfalls in the park. miles, of a landscape punctuated by steaming pools, bubbling mudpots, spewing geysers, and colorful volcanic soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Development Office 6920 YELLOWTAIL ROAD TELEPHONE: (307) 777-7626 CHEYENNE, WY 82002 FAX: (307) 777-6819 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
    THE STATE OF WYOMING Water Development Office 6920 YELLOWTAIL ROAD TELEPHONE: (307) 777-7626 CHEYENNE, WY 82002 FAX: (307) 777-6819 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: Water Development Commission DATE: December 13, 2013 FROM: Keith E. Clarey, P.G. REFERENCE: Snake/Salt River Basin Plan Update, 2012 SUBJECT: Available Groundwater Determination – Tab XI (2012) Contents 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 Hydrogeology .......................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 Groundwater Development .................................................................................................... 15 4.0 Groundwater Quality ............................................................................................................. 21 5.0 Geothermal Resources ........................................................................................................... 22 6.0 Groundwater Availability ...................................................................................................... 22 References ..................................................................................................................................... 23 Appendix A: Figures and Table ....................................................................................................... i 1.0 Introduction This 2013 Technical Memorandum is an update of the September 10, 2003,
    [Show full text]
  • Landsat Evaluation of Trumpeter Swan Historical Nesting Sites In
    Eastern Kentucky University Encompass Online Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2014 Landsat Evaluation Of Trumpeter Swan Historical Nesting Sites In Yellowstone National Park Laura Elizabeth Cockrell Eastern Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://encompass.eku.edu/etd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Ornithology Commons Recommended Citation Cockrell, Laura Elizabeth, "Landsat Evaluation Of Trumpeter Swan Historical Nesting Sites In Yellowstone National Park" (2014). Online Theses and Dissertations. 222. https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/222 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Online Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LANDSAT EVALUATION OF TRUMPETER SWAN HISTORICAL NESTING SITES IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK By Laura Elizabeth Cockrell Bachelor of Science California State University, Chico Chico, California 2007 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Eastern Kentucky University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May, 2014 Copyright © Laura Elizabeth Cockrell, 2014 All rights reserved ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to my family and friends for their unwavering support during this adventure. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was made possible through funding from the Yellowstone Park Foundation and the Society of Wetland Scientists Student Research Grant for support of field work, and by a Graduate Assistantship and Research Assistantship from the Department of Biological Sciences at Eastern Kentucky University. Thank you to Dr. Bob Frederick for his insight and persistence and for providing the GIS lab and to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Fly Fishing the Yellowstone Area: Hatch Charts and Angling Quality Charts
    Fly Fishing the Yellowstone Area: Hatch Charts and Angling Quality Charts This document compiles the general hatch charts, angling quality by timeframe charts, and fishery- specific hatch and fly suggestion charts provided on the how-to portion of the Parks’ Fly Shop website (www.parksflyshop.com) in an easy-to-print (and view) format. Please visit this website for much more information on fly fishing the Yellowstone area and southern Montana. I hope you find this information helpful. If you’re considering booking a fly fishing trip in Yellowstone or Montana, we would appreciate your business. Regards, Walter Wiese Head Guide, Parks’ Fly Shop (http://www.parksflyshop.com) www.flywalter.com [email protected] (406) 223-8204 This work is copyright Walter Wiese, 2018. You may distribute this document however you please, including for commercial purposes, in print or digital formats, with the following caveats: you may not alter it, you may not claim it as your own work, you must distribute the entire document if you choose to distribute any of it, and you must include this introduction and my contact information above. Table of Contents Here are some notes on how this document is organized… ................................................................... 3 General Hatch Charts .................................................................................................................................. 5 Where Should I Fish?...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Fish with Cover
    Yellowstone Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences Annual Report 2003 Thorofare Creek, October 2003. ellowstone National Park’s Yellowstone Lake is whirling behavior, abnormal feeding, and increased home to the premier surviving inland cutthroat vulnerability to predation, was first detected in Yellowstone Y trout fishery in North America. Two significant Lake in 1998, and in the Firehole River in 2000. This threats to the native Yellowstone cutthroat trout, discovered devastating disease further threatens already declining over a five-year period during the 1990s, irreversibly Yellowstone cutthroat trout populations. Although whirling altered the future of this thriving and diverse ecosystem. disease is currently believed to be concentrated in the Without swift, continuing action, negative effects on this northern regions of the Yellowstone Lake watershed, several trout population—a keystone energy source for numerous other tributaries have already been identified as at high risk. mammal and bird species and a recreational focus for In addition to native trout preservation, aquatics visitors—have the potential to produce ecosystemwide program goals include restoration of isolated but genetically consequences. pure westslope cutthroat trout, monitoring to track aquatic Predatory, non-native lake trout were likely illegally ecosystem health and expedite early warnings for other introduced to the lake in 1988 and not discovered until invasive exotic species, and encouragement of public 1994. They can consume 50–90 Yellowstone cutthroat trout involvement in various fisheries programs. per capita annually. Without heightened and maintained The stakes are high, raising the bar for innovative management efforts, they have the potential to decimate management and fundraising. The increased magnitude the Yellowstone Lake fishery in our lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • Coexisting Discrete Bodies of Rhyolite and Punctuated Volcanism Characterize 1
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Coexisting Discrete Bodies of Rhyolite and Punctuated 10.1029/2019GC008321 Volcanism Characterize Yellowstone's Post‐Lava Key Points: • Zircons from Yellowstone's Upper Creek Tuff Caldera Evolution ‐ Basin Member rhyolites yield U Pb Christy B. Till1 , Jorge A. Vazquez2 , Mark E. Stelten2 , Hannah I. Shamloo1 , dates defining crystallization 1,3 populations at ~750–550 and and Jamie S. Shaffer ~350–250 ka 1 2 • Discrete bodies of magma School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, characterized the subvolcanic CA, USA, 3Now at Arizona State Geological Sciences, Now at New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA system during the Upper Basin Member period and during storage of the Lava Creek Tuff ‐ 206 238 • Abstract Ion microprobe Pb/ U geochronology and trace element geochemistry of the unpolished The geochemical and isotopic ‐ evolution of Yellowstone's rims and sectioned interiors of zircons from Yellowstone caldera's oldest post caldera lavas provide post‐caldera rhyolites suggests a insight into the magmatic system during the prelude and aftermath of the caldera‐forming Lava Creek shift in the magmatic supereruption. The post‐caldera lavas compose the Upper Basin Member of the Plateau Rhyolite and fall assimilation/recharge ratio into two groups based on zircon crystallization age: early lavas with zircon ages between ~750 and 550 ka ‐ Supporting Information: and late lavas with zircon ages between ~350 and 250 ka. Zircons from the early erupted East Biscuit Basin • Supporting Information S1 flow yield U‐Pb dates and trace element compositions, which when considered with the Pb isotopic • Table S1 compositions of their coexisting feldspars and pyroxenes, point to an isotopically distinct parental melt • Table S2 • Table S3 present during crystallization of the Lava Creek magma but untapped by the supereruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Wide Hazardous Tree Removal and Fuels Reduction Project
    107°0'0"W VAIL k GYPSUM B e 6 u 6 N 1 k 2 k 1 h 2 e . e 6 . .1 I- 1 o 8 70 e c f 7 . r 0 e 2 2 §¨¦ e l 1 0 f 2 u 1 0 3 2 N 4 r r 0 1 e VailVail . 3 W . 8 . 1 85 3 Edwards 70 1 C 1 a C 1 .1 C 8 2 h N 1 G 7 . 7 0 m y 1 k r 8 §¨¦ l 2 m 1 e c . .E 9 . 6 z W A T m k 1 5 u C 0 .1 u 5 z i 6. e s 0 C i 1 B a -7 k s 3 2 .3 e e r I ee o C r a 1 F G Carterville h r e 9. 1 6 r g 1 N 9 g 8 r e 8 r y P e G o e u l Avon n C 9 N C r e n 5 ch w i r 8 .k2 0 N n D k 1 n 70 a tt e 9 6 6 8 G . c 7 o h 18 1 §¨¦ r I-7 o ra West Vail .1 1 y 4 u h 0 1 0. n lc 7 l D .W N T 7 39 . 71 . 1 a u 1 ch W C k 0 C d . 2 e . r e 1 e 1 C st G e e . r 7 A Red Hill R 3 9 k n s e 5 6 7 a t 2 .
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Evaluation of Infrared Imagery, Eastern Part of I 2 Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming and Montana I 3 by Ii I 4 I Harry W
    General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) ,,AT Qi I )^'--;fit,: JH J UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Interagency Report NASA-83 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY '^'•a.YA ). tbo 1958 WASHINGTON. D.C. 20242 H69 $ (ACCESSION NUMI ("RU) Mr. Robert Porter a Acting Program Chief, (CODE) Earth Resources S^irvey Code SAR - NASA Headquarters W—CR OR TMX NUMBER) OR AD tGTE60RY) Washington, D.C. 20545 Dear Bob: Transm_tted herewith is one copy of: INTERAGENCY REPORT NASA-82 GEOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF INFRARED IKAGERY, EASTERN PART OF YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PA%<, ViOtAING AND MONTANA* ^. by Harry W. Smedes** The U.S. Geological Survey has released this report in open files. Copies are available for consultation in the Geological Survey Libraries, 1033 GSA Building, Washington, D.C. 20242; Building 25, Federal Center, Danver, Colorado 80225; 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo ?ark, California 94025; and 601 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Winter Ecology of Bighorn Sheep In
    THESIS WINTER ECOLOGY OF BIGHORN SHEEP IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK Submitted by John L. 01demeyer In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Colorado State University December 1966 COLORADO STATE m~IVERSI1Y December 1966 WE HEREBY RECOl-lEEND 'lRAT lliE 'IHESIS PREPARED UNDER OUR SUPERVISION BY J onn L. 01demeyer ENTITLED tt'v-linter ecolo&;,( of bighorn sheep in yellowstone National ParkU BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING nus PART OF 'mE ~UIIill"LENTS FOR THE DillREE OF EASTER OF SCI~CE. CO:TJli ttee on Graduate Work --- - Examination Satisfacto~ Pennission to publish this thesis or any part of it must be obtained from the Dean of the Graduate School. PJL,ORADO STATE UN !VEKS ITY LI BRARIES i ABSTRACT WIN TER ECOLOOY OF ID:GHORN SHEEP IN YELLOVlS'IDHE NA TI ONAL PARK A bighorn sheep study was conducted on the northern winter range of yellowstone National Park, TNY01~inE from JIDle 1965 to June 1966. The objectives of the study were to census the bighorn population, map the winter bighorn distribution, detennine plant conposition and utilization on irnportant bighorn winter ranees, observe daily feedine habits, and assess the effect of competition on bighorn sheep. ~o hundred twen~ nine bighorn sheep wintered on the northern winter range. These herds were located on Nt. Everts, along the Yellowstone River, on Specimen Ridge, and along Soda Butte Creek. The ewe to ram ratio was 100: 78, the ewe to lamb ra tic waS 100: 47, and the ewe to yearling ratio was 100: 20. Range analysis was done on HacHinn Bench, Specimen Ridge, and Druid Peak.
    [Show full text]