10 DNA Structure and Analysis Chapter Concepts Many Complex Processes That Lead to an Organism’S Adult Form

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

10 DNA Structure and Analysis Chapter Concepts Many Complex Processes That Lead to an Organism’S Adult Form Bronze sculpture of the Watson–Crick model for double-helical DNA. ONLY 10 DNA Structure and Analysis CHAPTER CONCEPTS many complex processes that lead to an organism’s adult form. ■ Except in some viruses, DNA serves as the genetic Until 1944, it was not clear what chemical compo- material in all living organisms on Earth. nent of the chromosome makes up genes and constitutes ■ According to the Watson–Crick model, DNA exists in the genetic material. Because chromosomes were known the form of a right-handed double helix. to have both a nucleic acid and a protein component, both ■ The strands of the double helix are antiparallel and were candidates. In 1944, however, direct experimental evi- are held together by hydrogen bonding between dence emerged showing that the nucleic acid DNA serves complementary nitrogenous bases. as the informational basis for the process of heredity. ■ The structure of DNA provides the means of storing Once the importance of DNA to genetic processes was and expressing genetic information. realized, work was intensified with the hope of discerning ■ RNA has many similarities to DNAREVIEW but exists mostly as not only the structure of this molecule but also the relation- a single-stranded molecule. ship of its structure to its function. Between 1944 and 1953, many scientists sought information that might answer the ■ In some viruses, RNA serves as the genetic material. most significant and intriguing question in the history of ■ Many techniques have been developed that facilitate biology: How does DNA serve as the genetic basis for living the analysis of nucleic acids, most based on detection processes? Researchers believed the answer must depend of the complementarity of nitrogenous bases. strongly on the chemical structure of the DNA molecule, given the complex but orderly functions ascribed to it. p to this point in the text, we have described chro- These efforts were rewarded in 1953, when James mosomes as containing genes that control pheno- Watson and Francis Crick put forth their hypothesis for FORtypic traits transmitted through gametes to future the double-helical nature of DNA. The assumption that Uoffspring. Logically, genes must contain some sort of infor- the molecule’s functions would be easier to clarify once mation that, when passed to a new generation, influences its general structure was determined proved to be correct. the form and characteristics of each individual. We refer to In this chapter, we first review the evidence that DNA is that information as the genetic material. Logic also sug- the genetic material and then discuss the elucidation of its gests that this same information in some way directs the structure. We conclude the chapter with a discussion of 231 M10_KLUG8915_11_C10_pp231-260.indd 231 21/03/14 4:06 PM 232 10 DNA STRUCTURE AND ANALYSIS various analytical techniques useful during the investiga- DNA tion of the nucleic acids, DNA and RNA. Please note that some of the topics discussed in this chapter are explored in greater depth later in the text (see Transcription Special Topic Chapter 2—Emerging Roles of RNA). mRNA rRNA tRNA 10.1 The Genetic Material Must Exhibit Four Characteristics Ribosome For a molecule to serve as the genetic material, it must exhibit four crucial characteristics: replication, storage of Translation information, expression of information, and variation by mutation. Replication of the genetic material is one facet of the cell cycle and as such is a fundamental property of all living organisms. Once the genetic material of cells repli- Protein cates and is doubled in amount, it must then be partitioned FIGURE 10–1 Simplified diagram of information flow (the cen- equally—through mitosis—into daughter cells. The genetic tral dogma) from DNA to RNA to produceONLY the proteins within cells. material is also replicated during the formation of gametes, but is partitioned so that each cell gets only one-half of the original amount of genetic material—the process of meiosis translation, the chemical information in mRNA directs the (discussed in Chapter 2). Although the products of mitosis construction of a chain of amino acids, called a polypeptide, and meiosis are different, these processes are both part of which then folds into a protein. Collectively, these processes the more general phenomenon of cellular reproduction. serve as the foundation for the central dogma of molecular Storage of information requires the molecule to act as genetics: “DNA makes RNA, which makes proteins.” a repository of genetic information that may or may not be The genetic material is also the source of variabil- expressed by the cell in which it resides. It is clear that while ity among organisms, through the process of mutation. most cells contain a complete copy of the organism’s genome, If a mutation—a change in the chemical composition of at any point in time they express only a part of this genetic DNA—occurs, the alteration is reflected during transcrip- potential. For example, in bacteria many genes “turn on” in tion and translation, affecting the specific protein. If a response to specific environmental cues and “turn off ” when mutation is present in a gamete, it may be passed to future conditions change. In vertebrates, skin cells may display generations and, with time, become distributed in the pop- active melanin genes but never activate their hemoglobin ulation. Genetic variation, which also includes alterations genes; in contrast, digestive cells activate many genes specific of chromosome number and rearrangements within and to their function but do not activate their melanin genes. between chromosomes (as discussed in Chapter 8), pro- Inherent in the concept of storageREVIEW is the need for the vides the raw material for the process of evolution. genetic material to be able to encode the vast variety of gene products found among the countless forms of life on our planet. The chemical language of the genetic material must have the capability of storing such diverse informa- tion and transmitting it to progeny cells and organisms. 10.2 Until 1944, Observations Favored Expression of the stored genetic information is a com- Protein as the Genetic Material plex process that is the underlying basis for the concept of information flow within the cell (Figure 10–1). The initial The idea that genetic material is physically transmitted from event in this flow of information is the transcription of parent to offspring has been accepted for as long as the concept DNA, inFOR which three main types of RNA molecules are syn- of inheritance has existed. Beginning in the late nineteenth thesized: messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), century, research into the structure of biomolecules progressed and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). Of these, mRNAs are trans- considerably, setting the stage for describing the genetic mate- lated into proteins, by means of a process mediated by the rial in chemical terms. Although proteins and nucleic acid tRNA and rRNA. Each mRNA is the product of a specific were both considered major candidates for the role of genetic gene and leads to the synthesis of a different protein. In material, until the 1940s many geneticists favored proteins. M10_KLUG8915_11_C10_pp231-260.indd 232 4/9/14 11:30 AM 10.3 EVIDENCE FAVORING DNA AS THE GENETIC MATERIAL WAS FIRST OBTAINED DURING THE STUDY OF BACTERIA AND BACTERIOPHagES 233 This is not surprising, since proteins were known to be both strains of the bacterium Diplococcus pneumoniae.* Some diverse and abundant in cells, and much more was known were virulent, that is, infectious, strains that cause pneu- about protein than about nucleic acid chemistry. monia in certain vertebrates (notably humans and mice), DNA was first studied in 1869 by a Swiss chemist, whereas others were avirulent, or noninfectious strains, Friedrich Miescher. He isolated cell nuclei and derived which do not cause illness. an acidic substance, now known to contain DNA, that he The difference in virulence depends on the presence called nuclein. As investigations of DNA progressed, how- of a polysaccharide capsule; virulent strains have this cap- ever, showing it to be present in chromosomes, the sub- sule, whereas avirulent strains do not. The nonencapsulated stance seemed to lack the chemical diversity necessary to bacteria are readily engulfed and destroyed by phagocytic store extensive genetic information. cells in the host animal’s circulatory system. Virulent bac- This conclusion was based largely on Phoebus A. Levene’s teria, which possess the polysaccharide coat, are not easily observations in 1910 that DNA contained approximately engulfed; they multiply and cause pneumonia. equal amounts of four similar molecules called nucleotides. The presence or absence of the capsule causes a visible Levene postulated incorrectly that identical groups of these difference between colonies of virulent and avirulent four components were repeated over and over, which was the strains. Encapsulated bacteria form smooth, shiny-surfaced basis of his tetranucleotide hypothesis for DNA structure. colonies (S) when grown on an agar culture plate; non- Attention was thus directed away from DNA, thereby favor- encapsulated strains produce rough colonies (R). Thus, ing proteins. However, in the 1940s, Erwin Chargaff showed virulent and avirulent strains are easily distinguished by that Levene’s proposal was incorrect when he demonstrated standard microbiological culture techniques. that most organisms do not contain precisely equal propor- Each strain of DiplococcusONLY may be one of dozens of dif- tions of the four nucleotides. We shall see later that the struc- ferent types called serotypes that differ in the precise chemical ture of DNA accounts for Chargaff’s observations. structure of the polysaccharide constituent of the thick, slimy capsule. Serotypes are identified by immunological techniques and are usually designated by Roman numerals. In the United States, types I and II are the most common in causing pneu- monia.
Recommended publications
  • Sequencing As a Way of Work
    Edinburgh Research Explorer A new insight into Sanger’s development of sequencing Citation for published version: Garcia-Sancho, M 2010, 'A new insight into Sanger’s development of sequencing: From proteins to DNA, 1943-77', Journal of the History of Biology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 265-323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-009- 9184-1 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1007/s10739-009-9184-1 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Journal of the History of Biology Publisher Rights Statement: © Garcia-Sancho, M. (2010). A new insight into Sanger’s development of sequencing: From proteins to DNA, 1943-77. Journal of the History of Biology, 43(2), 265-323. 10.1007/s10739-009-9184-1 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 THIS IS AN ADVANCED DRAFT OF A PUBLISHED PAPER. REFERENCES AND QUOTATIONS SHOULD ALWAYS BE MADE TO THE PUBLISHED VERION, WHICH CAN BE FOUND AT: García-Sancho M.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Microarrays (Gene Chips) and Cancer
    DNA Microarrays (Gene Chips) and Cancer Cancer Education Project University of Rochester DNA Microarrays (Gene Chips) and Cancer http://www.biosci.utexas.edu/graduate/plantbio/images/spot/microarray.jpg http://www.affymetrix.com Part 1 Gene Expression and Cancer Nucleus Proteins DNA RNA Cell membrane All your cells have the same DNA Sperm Embryo Egg Fertilized Egg - Zygote How do cells that have the same DNA (genes) end up having different structures and functions? DNA in the nucleus Genes Different genes are turned on in different cells. DIFFERENTIAL GENE EXPRESSION GENE EXPRESSION (Genes are “on”) Transcription Translation DNA mRNA protein cell structure (Gene) and function Converts the DNA (gene) code into cell structure and function Differential Gene Expression Different genes Different genes are turned on in different cells make different mRNA’s Differential Gene Expression Different genes are turned Different genes Different mRNA’s on in different cells make different mRNA’s make different Proteins An example of differential gene expression White blood cell Stem Cell Platelet Red blood cell Bone marrow stem cells differentiate into specialized blood cells because different genes are expressed during development. Normal Differential Gene Expression Genes mRNA mRNA Expression of different genes results in the cell developing into a red blood cell or a white blood cell Cancer and Differential Gene Expression mRNA Genes But some times….. Mutations can lead to CANCER CELL some genes being Abnormal gene expression more or less may result
    [Show full text]
  • Dna the Code of Life Worksheet
    Dna The Code Of Life Worksheet blinds.Forrest Jowled titter well Giffy as misrepresentsrecapitulatory Hughvery nomadically rubberized herwhile isodomum Leonerd exhumedremains leftist forbiddenly. and sketchable. Everett clem invincibly if arithmetical Dawson reinterrogated or Rewriting the Code of Life holding for Genetics and Society. C A process look a genetic code found in DNA is copied and converted into value chain of. They may negatively impact of dna worksheet answers when published by other. Cracking the Code of saw The Biotechnology Institute. DNA lesson plans mRNA tRNA labs mutation activities protein synthesis worksheets and biotechnology experiments for open school property school biology. DNA the code for life FutureLearn. Cracked the genetic code to DNA cloning twins and Dolly the sheep. Dna are being turned into consideration the code life? DNA The Master Molecule of Life CDN. This window or use when he has been copied to a substantial role in a qualified healthcare professional journals as dna the pace that the class before scientists have learned. Explore the Human Genome Project within us Learn about DNA and genomics role in medicine and excellent at the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural. DNA The Double Helix. Most enzymes create a dna the code of life worksheet is getting the. Worksheet that describes the structure of DNA students color the model according to instructions Includes a. Biology Materials Handout MA-H2 Microarray Virtual Lab Activity Worksheet. This user has, worksheet the dna code of life, which proteins are carried on. Notes that scientists have worked 10 years to disappoint the manner human genome explains that DNA is a chemical message that began more data four billion years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • GENOME GENERATION Glossary
    GENOME GENERATION Glossary Chromosome An organism’s DNA is packaged into chromosomes. Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomesincluding one pair of sex chromosomes. Women have two X chromosomes and men have one X and one Y chromosome. Dominant (see also recessive) Genes come in pairs. A dominant form of a gene is the “stronger” version that will be expressed. Therefore if someone has one dominant and one recessive form of a gene, only the characteristics of the dominant form will appear. DNA DNA is the long molecule that contains the genetic instructions for nearly all living things. Two strands of DNA are twisted together into a double helix. The DNA code is made up of four chemical letters (A, C, G and T) which are commonly referred to as bases or nucleotides. Gene A gene is a section of DNA that is the code for a specific biological component, usually a protein. Each gene may have several alternative forms. Each of us has two copies of most of our genes, one copy inherited from each parent. Most of our traits are the result of the combined effects of a number of different genes. Very few traits are the result of just one gene. Genetic sequence The precise order of letters (bases) in a section of DNA. Genome A genome is the complete DNA instructions for an organism. The human genome contains 3 billion DNA letters and approximately 23,000 genes. Genomics Genomics is the study of genomes. This includes not only the DNA sequence itself, but also an understanding of the function and regulation of genes both individually and in combination.
    [Show full text]
  • Sol Spiegelman, a Pioneer in Molecular Biology
    They Wand 0SS tk Slmsldera of Giants: Sol S@egelman, a Piomer in l$lokcular Biology Number 21 May 23,1983 Science in our century has been Indeed, it is upon his widely acclaimed marked by tremendous upheavals in un- discoveries that much of the framework derstanding, brought about by momen- of the discipline now rests. Sol was still tous discoveries and extraordinary pe~ deeply involved in a number of projects ple. One such upheaval has occurred in when, tragically, he died following a biology. It began in the 1930s, when a brief illness on January 21, 1983.2 This new field, molecular biology, was born essay is dedicated to his memory, and to of the synthesis of five distinct disci- the surviving members of his family: hw plines: physical chemistry, crystallogra- wife, Helen; his daughter, Marjorie; and phy, genetics, microbiology, and bio- hk sons, Willard and George. chemistry.1 I deeply regret that Sol did not have Molecular biologists try to explain the opportunity to read this long biological phenomena at the molecular overdue discussion of his work. I had level. By the mid-twentieth century, planned to do this as part of our series of they had settled several problems that essays on various awards in science—in plagued previous generations of biolo- particular, the Feltnnelfi prize, men- gists. For instance, proteins and nucleic tioned later. Sol was one of the true acids had been known since the nine- giants of modem science. So it is with a teenth century to be very large mole- mixed sense of pain and gratitude that I cules, each consisting of long chains of use thk opportunity to pay tribute to a subunits—amino acids in the case of man whose genius was unique.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA: the Timeline and Evidence of Discovery
    1/19/2017 DNA: The Timeline and Evidence of Discovery Interactive Click and Learn (Ann Brokaw Rocky River High School) Introduction For almost a century, many scientists paved the way to the ultimate discovery of DNA and its double helix structure. Without the work of these pioneering scientists, Watson and Crick may never have made their ground-breaking double helix model, published in 1953. The knowledge of how genetic material is stored and copied in this molecule gave rise to a new way of looking at and manipulating biological processes, called molecular biology. The breakthrough changed the face of biology and our lives forever. Watch The Double Helix short film (approximately 15 minutes) – hyperlinked here. 1 1/19/2017 1865 The Garden Pea 1865 The Garden Pea In 1865, Gregor Mendel established the foundation of genetics by unraveling the basic principles of heredity, though his work would not be recognized as “revolutionary” until after his death. By studying the common garden pea plant, Mendel demonstrated the inheritance of “discrete units” and introduced the idea that the inheritance of these units from generation to generation follows particular patterns. These patterns are now referred to as the “Laws of Mendelian Inheritance.” 2 1/19/2017 1869 The Isolation of “Nuclein” 1869 Isolated Nuclein Friedrich Miescher, a Swiss researcher, noticed an unknown precipitate in his work with white blood cells. Upon isolating the material, he noted that it resisted protein-digesting enzymes. Why is it important that the material was not digested by the enzymes? Further work led him to the discovery that the substance contained carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and large amounts of phosphorus with no sulfur.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics Today - February 2003
    Physics Today - February 2003 Rosalind Franklin and the Double Helix Although she made essential contributions toward elucidating the structure of DNA, Rosalind Franklin is known to many only as seen through the distorting lens of James Watson's book, The Double Helix. by Lynne Osman Elkin - California State University, Hayward In 1962, James Watson, then at Harvard University, and Cambridge University's Francis Crick stood next to Maurice Wilkins from King's College, London, to receive the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their "discoveries concerning the molecular structure of nucleic acids and its significance for information transfer in living material." Watson and Crick could not have proposed their celebrated structure for DNA as early in 1953 as they did without access to experimental results obtained by King's College scientist Rosalind Franklin. Franklin had died of cancer in 1958 at age 37, and so was ineligible to share the honor. Her conspicuous absence from the awards ceremony--the dramatic culmination of the struggle to determine the structure of DNA--probably contributed to the neglect, for several decades, of Franklin's role in the DNA story. She most likely never knew how significantly her data influenced Watson and Crick's proposal. Franklin was born 25 July 1920 to Muriel Waley Franklin and merchant banker Ellis Franklin, both members of educated and socially conscious Jewish families. They were a close immediate family, prone to lively discussion and vigorous debates at which the politically liberal, logical, and determined Rosalind excelled: She would even argue with her assertive, conservative father. Early in life, Rosalind manifested the creativity and drive characteristic of the Franklin women, and some of the Waley women, who were expected to focus their education, talents, and skills on political, educational, and charitable forms of community service.
    [Show full text]
  • Frederick Griffith and Transformation
    Balderdash Example Griffith’s Transformation Experiment Ever since Edward Jenner invented the first vaccine in 1796 scientists have been working to vaccinate the world against all known diseases. Frederick Griffith wanted to save the world from pneumonia, a disease that was killing off much of Europe during the 1920’s. He didn’t build the pneumonia vaccine, but he did accidentally discover one of the most important concepts in bacterial survivability: Griffith discovered the principle of bacterial transformation. (In other words, why bacteria can fight off antibiotics) Griffith’s Transformation Experiment In 1928, Frederick Griffith was working with mice and two strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae One strain was “rough” in appearance and non-virulent, meaning that it wasn’t strong enough to hurt it’s host One strain was “smooth” in appearance and virulent. It was deadly to anyone who contracted the strain. The smooth strain looked smooth because it lacked a special protein coat that was rough in appearance and acted as a beacon summoning the mice’s immune systems. When injected with the rough (non-virulent) strain, mice lived When injected with the smooth (virulent) strain, mice died. Both as expected. Griffith’s Transformation Experiment Next, Griffith boiled the deadly, smooth strand of bacteria to kill it. He then injected mice with the deadly but boiled strand. Once again, as expected, the mice still lived. Finally, he injected the mice with BOILED smooth strands and LIVING rough strands The smooth strands are normally deadly, but Griffith had boiled them so they were not dangerous anymore. The rough strands were never deadly even when they were alive.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding the Genetic Code Lei Wang and Peter G
    Reviews P. G. Schultz and L. Wang Protein Science Expanding the Genetic Code Lei Wang and Peter G. Schultz* Keywords: amino acids · genetic code · protein chemistry Angewandte Chemie 34 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim DOI: 10.1002/anie.200460627 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44,34–66 Angewandte Protein Science Chemie Although chemists can synthesize virtually any small organic molecule, our From the Contents ability to rationally manipulate the structures of proteins is quite limited, despite their involvement in virtually every life process. For most proteins, 1. Introduction 35 modifications are largely restricted to substitutions among the common 20 2. Chemical Approaches 35 amino acids. Herein we describe recent advances that make it possible to add new building blocks to the genetic codes of both prokaryotic and 3. In Vitro Biosynthetic eukaryotic organisms. Over 30 novel amino acids have been genetically Approaches to Protein encoded in response to unique triplet and quadruplet codons including Mutagenesis 39 fluorescent, photoreactive, and redox-active amino acids, glycosylated 4. In Vivo Protein amino acids, and amino acids with keto, azido, acetylenic, and heavy-atom- Mutagenesis 43 containing side chains. By removing the limitations imposed by the existing 20 amino acid code, it should be possible to generate proteins and perhaps 5. An Expanded Code 46 entire organisms with new or enhanced properties. 6. Outlook 61 1. Introduction The genetic codes of all known organisms specify the same functional roles to amino acid residues in proteins. Selectivity 20 amino acid building blocks. These building blocks contain a depends on the number and reactivity (dependent on both limited number of functional groups including carboxylic steric and electronic factors) of a particular amino acid side acids and amides, a thiol and thiol ether, alcohols, basic chain.
    [Show full text]
  • From 1957 to Nowadays: a Brief History of Epigenetics
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review From 1957 to Nowadays: A Brief History of Epigenetics Paul Peixoto 1,2, Pierre-François Cartron 3,4,5,6,7,8, Aurélien A. Serandour 3,4,6,7,8 and Eric Hervouet 1,2,9,* 1 Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, Interactions Hôte-Greffon-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique, F-25000 Besançon, France; [email protected] 2 EPIGENEXP Platform, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-25000 Besançon, France 3 CRCINA, INSERM, Université de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France; [email protected] (P.-F.C.); [email protected] (A.A.S.) 4 Equipe Apoptose et Progression Tumorale, LaBCT, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, 44805 Saint Herblain, France 5 Cancéropole Grand-Ouest, Réseau Niches et Epigénétique des Tumeurs (NET), 44000 Nantes, France 6 EpiSAVMEN Network (Région Pays de la Loire), 44000 Nantes, France 7 LabEX IGO, Université de Nantes, 44000 Nantes, France 8 Ecole Centrale Nantes, 44300 Nantes, France 9 DImaCell Platform, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-25000 Besançon, France * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 9 September 2020; Accepted: 13 October 2020; Published: 14 October 2020 Abstract: Due to the spectacular number of studies focusing on epigenetics in the last few decades, and particularly for the last few years, the availability of a chronology of epigenetics appears essential. Indeed, our review places epigenetic events and the identification of the main epigenetic writers, readers and erasers on a historic scale. This review helps to understand the increasing knowledge in molecular and cellular biology, the development of new biochemical techniques and advances in epigenetics and, more importantly, the roles played by epigenetics in many physiological and pathological situations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson Overview to Answer That Question, the First Thing You Need to 12.1 Identifying the Know Is What Genes Are Made Of
    THINK ABOUT IT How do genes work? Lesson Overview To answer that question, the first thing you need to 12.1 Identifying the know is what genes are made of. Substance of Genes How would you go about figuring out what molecule or molecules go into making a gene? Griffith’s Experiments Bacterial Transformation Griffith isolated two different strains of the same bacterial The discovery of the chemical nature of the gene began in 1928 species. with British scientist Frederick Griffith, who was trying to figure Both strains grew very well in culture plates in Griffith’s lab, but out how certain types of bacteria produce pneumonia. only one of the strains caused pneumonia. The disease-causing bacteria (S strain) grew into smooth colonies on culture plates, whereas the harmless bacteria (R strain) produced colonies with rough edges. Griffith’s Experiments Griffith’s Experiments When Griffith injected mice with disease-causing bacteria, First, Griffith took a culture of the S strain, heated the cells the mice developed pneumonia and died. to kill them, and then injected the heat-killed bacteria into When he injected mice with harmless bacteria, the mice laboratory mice. stayed healthy. The mice survived, suggesting that the cause of pneumonia Perhaps the S-strain bacteria produced a toxin that made was not a toxin from these disease-causing bacteria. the mice sick? To find out, Griffith ran a series of experiments. Griffith’s Experiments Griffith’s Experiments In Griffith’s next experiment, he mixed the heat-killed, The lungs of these mice were filled with the disease-causing S-strain bacteria with live, harmless bacteria from the R bacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • 158273443.Pdf
    Cover: A single cell from a mouse embryo, moving about on a glass slide. The cell was fixed and then stained with antibody to actomyosin, a contractile protein complexof muscle cells. The antibody was visualized by fluorescence, and its pattern revealed thatthe embryo cell contained actomyosin in sheaths, even though it was not a muscle cell. (Photo by B. Pollack, K. Weber, G. Felsten) ANNUAL REPORT 1974 COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY COLD SPRING HARBOR, NEW YORK COLD SPRINGHARBOR LABORATORY Cold Spring Harbor, Long Island,New York OFFICERS OF THE CORPORATION Chairman: Robert H. P. Olney Secretary: Dr. Bayard Clarkson 1st Vice Chairman: Edward Pulling Treasurer: Angus P. McIntyre 2nd Vice Chairman: Arthur Trottenberg Assistant Secretary-Treasurer: William R. Udry Laboratory Director: Dr. James D. Watson Administrative Director: William R. Udry BOARD OF TRUSTEES INSTITUTIONAL TRUSTEES Albert Einstein College of Medicine New York University MedicalCenter Dr. Harry Eagle Dr. Milton R. J. Salton The City University of New York Princeton University Dr. Norman R. Eaton Dr. Bruce Alberts Columbia University The Rockefeller University Dr. James E. Darnell, Jr. Dr. Rollin Hotchkiss Duke UniversityMedical Center Sloan-Kettering Institute Dr. Robert E. Webster Dr. Bayard Clarkson Harvard MedicalSchool University of Chicago Dr. Charles A.Thomas, Jr. Dr. Robert Haselkorn Long IslandBiological Association University of Wisconsin Mr. Edward Pulling Dr. Julian Davies Massachusetts Wawepex Society Institute of Technology J. Knight Dr. HermanEisen Mr. Townsend INDIVIDUALTRUSTEES Dr. DavidP. Jacobus Colton P. Wagner Watson Mrs. GeorgeN. Lindsay Dr. James D. White Angus P.McIntyre Mrs. Alex M. A. Woodcock RobertH. P. Olney Mr. William WalterII. Page Honorary Trustees: Hollaender CharlesS.
    [Show full text]