1
Brief history of the center of the Universe
Setting the stage for: The Great Debate Lovers of irony take note Who won? Does it matter?
Any take home lessons?
Today 2
1 Paid their astronomers to figure out the size of the Universe
Fast forward 2200 years to now, guess what?
Astronomers still busy trying to figure out the size of the Universe
The more things change the more they stay the same?
3
The Universe… The Center of the Universe…
Me NOT YOU!
4
2 5
In the sky they saw: the Sun, the Moon, Planets, Stars, some small fuzzy patches, AND ONE BIG FUZZY PATCH
Goes from horizon to horizon
As a scientist, have to explain that big fuzzy
patch in the sky 6
3 Copernicus moves the Sun to the center of the solar system, but keeps the planets moving on circles
Kepler finally gets it right (by exhaustion) and puts the planets moving on ellipses
Galileo using telescope finds supporting, not conclusive, evidence Phases of Venus Moons of Jupiter
Net effect: Center of the Universe moves 93 million
miles to the right from the Earth to the Sun 7
The Universe… The Center of the Universe…
The Sun NOT YOU! Me
8
4 Galileo also used the telescope to look at the big fuzzy patch in the sky Turned out to be nothing but stars So why are there a lot of stars in a band?
Thomas Wright Two concentric spheres In between these spheres are all the stars & our Sun and solar system, a shell of stars Look perpendicular to spheres see few stars Look along shell see more stars
Center of the Universe is on the move! 9
The Universe… The Center of the Universe…
The Sun
10
5 Charles Messier French astronomer during Comet craze Even with best telescopes of the day some fuzzy patches still fuzzy Real annoying when want to find a comet (another type of fuzzy patch) Came up with a catalogue of 100 fuzzy patches to ignore So don’t look at the following
11
12
6 13
14
7 15
William Hershel English astronomer Surveyed the whole sky and did star counts Saw less stars out of the plane of the Milky Way Decrease in density of stars as got further from the Sun Some of fuzzy patches could be resolved into stars, so assumed that was true for all objects.
16
8 17
The Universe… The Center of the Universe…
The Sun NOT YOU! Me
18
9 William Parsons English astronomer mid‐1800’s 72 inch telescope (He was an Earl) Could see some spiral structure in some nebula (fuzzy patches) No way to estimate distance to them (if know distance know size)
19
Jacobus Kapteyn Dutch astronomer at turn of century (1900’s) Did star counts a lá Hershel and came to the same conclusions as Hershel (200 yrs no change) Galaxy flattened disk . 10 kiloparsecs in diameter . 2 kiloparses thick . Sun near center
20
10 But what were those spiral nebula? Galaxies like ours but far, far away? (Island Universes) Or objects within our galaxy (galaxy = universe)?
21
Write “before” on one side & your name
And answer the following question: Are science debates useful for . For Science? . For informing the public?
22
11 Prohibition took effect on 16 January
Women could vote for President for the first time
Communist party completed take over of the U.S.S.R.
Population of the U.S. 108 million Total graduating from High School 300,000 60% Women 40% Men Total graduating from College 48,000 66% Men, 33% Women (U of MD enrollment 27,000)
23
Nuclear Fusion unknown This is what powers stars Talk of “subatomic energy”
Thought elements common in the Earth dominated the composition of the stars: Oxygen Silicon Iron
Stars are 90% H2 & 10% He Thesis of Cecilia Payne in 1925 And later work by Russell on the Sun
24
12 George Ellery Hale (big shot): Funded an annual lecture at the NAS Wanted either: . The size of the universe (galaxy) . Relativity
Secretary of the Academy wrote back Size of universe is boring Suggested instead: . Cause of glacial periods . Something biological
25
Hale wrote back, How about relativity then?
Secretary of the Academy wrote back: “I would rather have a subject in which there would be a half dozen members of the Academy competent enough to understand at least a few words of what the speakers were saying if we had a symposium upon it”
In the end “The Scale of the Universe” was the topic
Harlow Shapley Vs. Heber Curtis 26
13 A young ambitious astronomer, a golden boy of astronomy
Published a series of papers on properties of stars in binary systems or globular clusters
Hale was his boss (and when your boss asks you to do something…)
27
Very nervous Knew Curtis was the better speaker Position of the Director of the Harvard College Observatory had just opened up and he really, really, really wanted the job Talk was essentially a job interview for him
28
14 He was a bit older, more established, the “pro”
By far the better speaker
Had published a series of papers on the properties of spiral nebulae.
Hard worker usually taking the conservative view
Frequently skeptical of anything new until proven to his exacting standards.
29
Essentially read his paper: 19 typewritten pages
Gave a very elementary general talk, Six pages in finally defines a light year.
Focused on the scale of the Galaxy
Final three pages are devoted to equipment he developed Irrelevant to his main argument But perhaps directed to those members of the audience responsible for the future development of Harvard College Observatory! 30
15 His model for the Galaxy based upon distribution of globular clusters Globular clusters are concentrated more toward one half of the sky. That half of the sky must be where the true center of our Galaxy is. Got distance to clusters from RR Lyre and Cepheid variable stars
31
Size of the Galaxy Diameter of our Galaxy was 100 kiloparsecs, 10 times larger than Kapteyn’s value! Reality more like 50 kiloparsecs
Placement of the Sun Sun 20 kiloparsecs from the Galactic Center So much for being the center of the universe Reality more like 8 kiloparsecs
32
16 What are (where are) the spiral nebulae then?
Shapley thought that the Galaxy was so large it was essentially the whole universe. Therefore spiral nebulae are in the galaxy.
Knew that the nebulae were moving away from us from spectroscopic observations (red‐shifts).
Spiral Nebula are gaseous clouds repelled by the light pressure of our Galaxy (think solar sails) 33
Based his size of galaxy arguments upon: Star count analysis Distance estimates involving the spectral types and intrinsic brightness's of different type stars.
Size of the Galaxy Followed Kapteyn : 10 kiloparsecs in diameter Reality more like 50 kiloparsecs (Note (10 + 100)/2 = 55)
Sun close to the galactic center
34
17 Disagreed with Shapley that Cepheid variables were good distance indicators (or more like it that more data are needed)
What are (where are) the spiral nebulae then?
Knew that the nebulae were moving away from us from spectroscopic measurements High radial velocities for the nebulae He argued if they were in the galaxy they would be moving much more slowly relative to the sun.
35
What are (where are) the spiral nebulae then?
Novae (Stellar explosions) Novae observed in our Galaxy were similar to novae observed in spiral nebulae But novae in spiral nebulae very faint Implying that the nebulae were very distant & outside the galaxy
So the spiral nebulae are systems of stars
Therefore our galaxy just one of potentially many galaxies 36
18 Shapley did go on to become director of Harvard’s Observatory
Not much attention in the popular or scientific press
Who won? Human interest importance? Scientific importance?
37
Shapley –studied globular clusters Better size of galaxy Sun is off to one side Cepheid variables are good distance indicators to globular clusters
Curtis –studied spiral nebula Spiral nebulae are really galaxies Novae observed in spiral nebulae are similar to novae observed in our Galaxy
38
19 Here there be dust – Messes up star counts Imagine you are in a very thick fog in a city and can see only one city block in any direction. Can you tell where are you in the city? Explains why globular clusters can be used to find the center of the galaxy
39
Edwin Hubble in 1924 Working at Mount Wilson observatory, where Shapley worked at the time of “The Great Debate” Photographed the Andromeda nebulae & identified a Cepheid variable Which Shapley believed could be used as distance indicators but not Curtis Got a distance to the Andromeda Galaxy of 750 kiloparsecs and size for the Andromeda Galaxy of 70 kiloparsecs ! Showing Curtis was correct about the spiral nebulae 40
20 The Universe courtesy of Shapley The Center of the Universe (galaxy)
You are off to one side and only a small part of the Universe
41
The Universe courtesy of Curtis & Shapley & Hubble
Galaxy
Galaxy
Galaxy Galaxy
You are off to one side and only a small part of a galaxy
42
21 What makes you feel important? Being the center of everything and everything turns around you? Or being unique, there is one and only one you?
Does this effect how you feel about humans? Important, special, unique? Scopes monkey trial
43
Write “after” on the other side
Are science debates useful for . For Science? . For informing the public?
44
22 But wait it gets worse!
Something similar to “Great Debate” going on today
Or the ancient Greeks, take your pick
But first to play with blocks
45
Earth Solar System
Solar System Sun Either eight, nine, or eleven planets, with moons (some as large as Mercury) Asteroids Comets Gas Dust
46
23 47
48
24 Earth Solar System Galaxy
Our Galaxy (Milky Way) All the stars you can see in the night sky . Single Stars with planets . Double and triple star systems (some with planets!) Gas Dust
49
Han Solo: It's the ship that made the Kessel run in less than twelve parsecs!
Ben reacts to Solo's stupid attempt to impress them with obvious misinformation.
50
25 51
52
26 Only one method gives you an unambiguous start Parallax (Geometry) If p = 1 arc second, then d = 1 parsec (Full moon 30 arc seconds) 1 parsec = 3.26 light years No star within 1 parsec of the Earth–Sun System
53
Radius = r Surface area = 4 r2
Radius = 2r Surface area = 4 4 r2
54 54
27 55
N.B. Deceptive Log Scale in Use
56
28 Pioneering work done by Henrietta Leavitt 57
Earth Solar System Galaxy Galaxy groups, clusters, super clusters Universe
Universe Galaxies Clusters of galaxies Super clusters of galaxies Gas between galaxies
58
29 59
That is all of the visible mass
In the 1970’s it became apparent there must be more mass in the Milky Way than what we could see.
Most of the mass (80%) of the Milky Way is in “dark” matter
This appears to be the case for other galaxies and galaxy clusters 60
30 61
62
31 Increasing evidence that this dark matter is NOT the same type of matter that makes up you and me.
Dark Matter only affected by the gravitational force (not light)
Stuff up there is NOT the same as stuff down here.
63
So when we thought we were looking at the Universe were only looking at 20% of the Universe mass in the Universe
But wait it gets worse!
64
32 Starts really, really, really, really, small & hot
Space expands –Universe gets bigger
Expansion called the “Big Bang”
If only gravity effecting this expansion what should be happening to the rate of expansion over time?
Slow down Could go to zero at infinite time Could turn around and lead to a Big Crunch
65
In the 1990’s observations of nova’s in distant galaxies showed the expansion has accelerated over time.
So to go with the dark matter now have dark energy or the dark force Acts like anti‐gravity Only over large distances We don’t know what it is But there is a lot of it!
66
33 So how much dark energy is there?
Mass and energy are can be thought of as equivalent via E = mc2
So sum up the mass, dark mass, and dark energy in the universe:
67
Update: Dark Energy 68%, Dark Matter 27%, Normal Matter 5% 68
34 69
“Subatomic energy” Nuclear Fusion
“Dark energy” ???
Only one galaxy many other galaxies
We are observing all of the universe HA!
70
35 71
72
36 73
What makes you feel important? Being the center of everything and everything turns around you? Or being unique, there is one and only one you?
Does this effect how you feel about humans? Important, special, unique? Evolution on trial
74
37 http://dingo.care2.com/cards/flash/5409/galaxy.swf
75
References http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/diamond_jubilee/debat e.html http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/diamond_jubilee/debat e20.html The 1920 Shapley‐Curtis Discussion: Background, Issues, and Aftermath. Virginia Trimble, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 107 1122‐1144, December 1995. Dr. Alan Peel
76
38