DOCSLIB.ORG

Marketing Fragment 6 X 10.T65

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marketing Fragment 6 X 10.T65 Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87719-0 - Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective Kenneth F. Greene Index More information Index Abramson, Paul, 19, 174 authoritarian regimes. See fully closed Abreu, Jogin, 27 authoritarian regimes; activists, 141, 184. See also party elites one-party regimes Adams, James, 26, 50, 52, 54, 65 authoritarian tools, 14, 15, 34, 57–59, Aguilar Zinser, Adolfo, 230, 238 259, 306. See also electoral Aldrich, John, 11, 121, 122, 129, 133, fraud; individual country cases; 136, 159, 184 repression Aleman,´ Miguel, 74, 79–81 Avila Camacho, Manuel, 74, 77, 79 Alliance for Change, 221 Almazan,´ Juan Andreu, 78 Bahamas, 256 Alvarez, R. Michael, 246 Bailey, John, 46, 80, 85 Alves, Maria Helena Moreira, 44 bank nationalization, Mexico, 92 Ames, Barry, 46 Bank Savings Protection Fund Amigos de Fox, 114, 214, 231–32, (FOBAPROA), Mexico, 112, 242, 253 222, 238 Angola, 13 Banquet, the, Mexico, 105 Antorcha Popular, 203, 214 Barisan Alternatif (BA), Malaysia, Arap Moi, Daniel, 7 271 Arce, Rene,´ 205 Barisan Nasional (BN), Malaysia, 37, Argentina, 83 269. See also United Malays Arian, Alan, 10, 16, 46, 276 National Organization Arredondo Ramırez,´ Pablo, (UMNO) 110 Barnes, Samuel, 10, 16, 46, 276, Arrellano, David, 99, 100, 213 287 Arriola, Carlos, 9, 87–90, 166 Bartels, Larry, 244 Aspe, Pedro, 101–3, 105 Bartlett, Manuel, 214 Assembly of Neighborhoods (AB), Bartra, Roger, 45, 73 199, 204 Basanez,˜ Miguel, 88, 89, 173, 233 Authentic Revolutionary Party of BDP. See Botswana Democratic Mexico (PARM), Mexico, 94 Party 333 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87719-0 - Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective Kenneth F. Greene Index More information 334 Index Beck, Thorsten, 15, 18, 23, 24 campaign finance. See also dominant Bejerano, Rene,´ 190 party resource advantages; Berton, Peter, 278, 279 patronage Besley, Timothy, 130 in Mexico, 107–14, 149, 212, 231 Bianco, William, 11, 121, 133 equality of, 213, 215 biased party competition. See government donations, 111 dominant party resource illegal funds, 113, 114, 213 advantages; party competition, and party competitiveness, 107 spatial theories of; patronage; private donations, 111, 212 repression in Taiwan, 266, 268 black-gold politics, Taiwan, 266, 268 campaign restrictions, Japan, 283 Blondel, Jean, 10, 15, 16 campaigns. See Cardenas´ Solorzano, BNF. See Botswana National Front C.; Fox, V.; Labastida, F. Boix, Carles, 12, 22, 158, 299, 308 Campbell, John, 282 Borjas Benavente, Adriana Leticia, 9, Candiani, Mauricio, 201, 202 154 Cardenas´ Solorzano, Cuauhtemoc,´ 7, Bortolotti, Bernardo, 293 93, 95, 154, 189, 196, 198, Botswana, 17, 22, 37 199, 203, 211, 221–53 passim, Botswana Congress Party (BCP), 38 301 Botswana Democratic Party (BDP), campaign strategy of, 234, 253 17, 38 campaign style of, 239 Botswana National Front (BNF), 37 centrism of, 240–44 Bouton, Lawrence, 272 competence ratings of, 238, 252 Brandenburg, Frank, 4, 76, 299 defection from, 245, 249, 251 Bravo Mena, Luis Felipe, 232 electoral coalition of, 233 Brazil, 44, 85, 104, 302 nomination of in 2000, 229–30, Brody, David, 243 267 Brooker, Paul, 10, 44 noncentrism of, 252 Brownlee, Jason, 62 viability assessments of, 250, 252 Bruhn, Kathleen, 8, 9, 73, 74, 81, 86, voter defection from, 240 93, 94, 106, 107, 144, 152, Cardenas,´ Lazaro,´ 73–94 passim 154, 160, 177, 227, 230, 232, Carey, John, 61, 266 235, 237, 239 Carothers, Thomas, 14 Bruno, Giovanni, 294 Carr, Barry, 9, 79–82, 85–87, 152 Buendıa,´ Jorge, 20, 174 Case, William, 269, 272 bureaucracy. See public bureaucracy Cassa per il Mezzogiorno, Italy, 289, Business Coordinating Council (CCE), 293 Mexico, 88, 89 Castaneda,˜ Jorge, 7, 94, 95, 230 Butler, Kimberly, 15 Castillo Peraza, Carlos, 202 Castillo, Heberto, 84, 235 cacique, 203 Castles, Francis, 286 Calder, Kent, 281 catchall parties. See also individual Calderon´ Hinojosa, Felipe, 124 party names Calderon,´ Luisa Marıa,´ 207 definition of, 37 camarillas, 99. See also Institutional extensive expansion of, 191 Revolutionary Party (PRI) organizational profile of, 179 Cameroon, 13 recruitment style of, 183 Camp, Roderic Ai, 99, 233, 299 voter communication style of, 184 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87719-0 - Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective Kenneth F. Greene Index More information Index 335 Catholic Church, 111, 191 in Taiwan, 267 CD, Mexico. See Democratic Current public goods taregting and, 283 Centeno, Miguel Angel, 101, 106 Cline, Howard, 4, 299 Cervera Pacheco, Victor, 214 CNC. See National Campesino Chand, Vikram, 9 Confederation, Mexico Chandra, Kanchan, 276 CNOP. See National Confederation of Charlesworth, James, 18 Popular Organizations charro, 79. See also authoritarian Coate, Steven, 130 tools Coleman, James, 15 Chaudhry, Kiren, 307 Collier, David, 45, 76, 77, 80 Chen, Shui-bian, 267, 268 Collier, Ruth Berins, 45, 76, 77, 80, Cheng, Tun-jen, 10, 45, 262, 264 91 Chhibber, Pradeep, 276 Colosio, Luis Donaldo, 105 Chile, 7, 44, 87, 104, 134, 299 command economy, 307 Chong, Dennis, 122–24 competitive authoritarianism, 11, 14, Christensen, Ray, 276, 278, 280, 15, 307, 308 282–84 conceptual stretching, 260 Christian Democratic Party (DC), Conchello, Jose´ Angel, 87, 165 Italy, 276, 285, 300. See also Confederation of Industrial Business dominant party systems; Chambers (CONCAMIN), dominant party democratic Mexico, 89 regimes (DPDRs) Confederation of Mexican Workers alternative arguments for (CTM), 75, 77, 100, 104, 105, dominance, 285 212 as catchall party, 285 Congress Party, India, 258, 276 end of dominance, 294 congressional gridlock, Mexico, 8, parliamentarism and dominance, 302 287 Conover, Pamela Johnston, 243 resource advantages, 285, 288 Coordinator of University Students control of public bureaucracy by, (CEU), Mexico, 190 290–91 Cornelius, Wayne, 50, 72, 81, 98, 102, decline of, 292–94 111, 203, 214, 215, 233, 299 origin of, 289–91 costs of participation. See opportunity types of, 289–91, 294 costs; party elites; repression Chu, Yun-han, 38, 45, 122, 261–64, Coteˆ d’Ivoire, 13 266 Cotton, James, 122, 264 Chua, Huat Beng, 37, 38, 271, 273, Coulon, Christian, 37 274 Cox, Gary, 11, 15, 16, 18, 23–26, 48, Civic Alliance, Mexico, 111 52, 62, 70, 121, 127, 133, 177, Civic Union of Iztapalapa (UCI), 245, 257, 262, 263, 266, 277, Mexico, 204 278 civil service. See public bureaucracy Craig, Ann, 50, 72, 81, 98, 102, 299 Clark, Peter, 123, 125 Crespo, Jose´ Antonio, 195 cleavages. See partisan cleavages Cristero Rebellion, 76 clientelism. See also patronage Mexico, 78 as compared to patronage, 40 Cross, John, 104 in Italy, 289 Crouch, Harold, 45, 50, 269, 270, in Japan, 278, 281, 283 272–74 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87719-0 - Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective Kenneth F. Greene Index More information 336 Index CTM. See Confederation of Mexican 307. See also individual party Workers names and countries Cuellar,´ Angelica,´ 199 dominant party democratic regimes Curtis, Gerald, 277, 279, 281–84 (DPDRs), 258, 259, 275–95. See also individual party names Dalton, Matt, 97, 156 and countries DAP. See Democratic Action Party, dominant party equilibrium, 16, 306 Malaysia in Botswana, 37 Davis, Otto, 48 formal model of, 47–59 DC. See Christian Democratic Party, in Italy, 285–88 Italy in Japan, 278–81 de la Madrid, Miguel, 91, 166, 199 in Malaysia, 37, 268–71 de Palma, Andre,´ 26, 177 in Mexico, 37, 71, 72 debt crisis. See economic crisis, in in Senegal, 37 Mexico in Taiwan, 38, 261–62 dedazo, 77, 236 dominant party resource advantages, Deininger, Klaus, 22 5–6, 298, 306. See also della Porta, Donatella, 285, 291, 294, individual party names; 295 patronage Democratic Action Party (DAP), control of public bureaucracy, 41 Malaysia, 38, 270 effects on political parties, 39 Democratic Current (CD), Mexico, measurement of, 149–50 93, 154, 190 and probability of victory, 47–52 Democratic Mexican Party (PDM), 86 types of, 39–42 Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), dominant party systems. See also Taiwan, 38, 261–63, 267, 268 dominant parties; dominant democratization. See transitions to party authoritarian regimes democracy (DPARs); dominant party di Palma, Guiseppe, 285 democratic regimes (DPDRs); Diamond, Larry, 14, 267, 268 individual party names and Diaw, Aminata, 20, 37 countries; resource theory of Dıaz-Cayeros,´ Alberto, 106 single-party dominance Dillon, Samuel, 98, 99, 212, 235, 237 authoritarian tools and, 34, 42–45 dinosaurs, 236. See also Institutional case selection for comparison, 256 Revolutionary Party (PRI) compared to fully competitive Diouf, Mamadou, 20, 37 democracies, 17 doctrinarios, 166. See also National compared to predominant party Action Party (PAN) systems, 259 dominant parties. See also dominant cultural theory of, 10, 257 party systems definition of, 12–16 centrism of, 45, 309 dominant party’s policy appeals defection from, 61–62 and, 45–47 legitimacy of, 10, 46 DPARs compared to DPDRs, origins of, 10 258–60 and turnout, 46 economic crisis and, 21 dominant party authoritarian regimes examples of, 16, 37, 258 (DPARs), 14, 16, 258, 261–76, existing theories of, 10, 17–27, 257 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87719-0 - Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective Kenneth F. Greene Index More information Index 337 institutional theory and, 22–24, 257 Eckstein, Susan, 183, 203 in Italy, 284–95 economic crisis, 174 in Japan, 277–84 effects on party elites’ policy in Malaysia, 37, 268–75 preferences, 159 modernization theory and, 21–22, in Malaysia, 274 257 in Mexico, 8, 74, 89–91, 94, 102, neutral models and, 24–26 115, 166, 173 non-neutral models and, 26–27 effective number of parties, 17–19 opposition coordination in, 308 Egypt, 13, 62 opposition party types in, 35–38 Eisenstadt, Shmuel, 50, 158 parliamentary systems, 15, 220, Eisenstadt, Todd, 7, 59, 95 257, 276 ejidos,80 patronage.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mexico's Presidential Candidates Hernán Ancona C.*
    Voices of Mexico /April • June, 1994 19 Mexico's presidential candidates Hernán Ancona C.* he political scene is set, the lights are on and the entire cast of nine actors have begun to deliver their fines with a vengeance; their supporters and the circumstances demand no less. TThe Mexican electorate can look forward to a wide range of political options including Luis Donaldo Colosio (PRI), Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas (PRD), Diego Fernández de Cevallos (PAN), Pablo Emilio Madero (UNO), Cecilia Soto (PT), Jorge González Torres (PVEM), Marcela Lombardo Otero (PPS), Rafael Aguilar Talamantes (PFCRN) and Alvaro Pérez Treviño (PARM). The candidates' initially lackluster performance was followed by a radical change, largely as a result of the uprising launched by the Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN). Although experts say the EZLN will not guarantee the transition to democracy with acts of violence, it has made the country's leaders aware that democracy has become a necessary pre-requisite for social peace. The terms of the new Federal Code of Electoral Institutions and Procedures have forced minority and so-called satellite ' parties to offer presidential candidates. The forthcoming August 21 elections will be the most hotly contested in the country's modem history. Yet while the number of candidates is the largest in recent years, only ina. t three candidates are thought to be really in the running: la Luis Donaldo Colosio, Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas and Diego en Fernández de Cevallos. / Imag The long list of candidates includes two women, who, Cruz io although little-known in the national political scene and ton virtually outside of the hard-fought contest, also form part An of this smorgasbord of options: Marcela Lombardo Otero Marco and Cecilia Soto González.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaxiola Lazcano 2021.Pdf (1.560Mb)
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. THE CHANGING PARTY SYSTEM IN MEXICO (1970-1988) Ana Victoria Gaxiola Lazcano Ph. D. in Sociology The University of Edinburgh 2020 Lay Summary of Thesis The lay summary is a brief summary intended to facilitate knowledge transfer and enhance accessibility, therefore the language used should be non-technical and suitable for a general audience. Guidance on the lay summary in a thesis. (See the Degree Regulations and Programmes of Study, General Postgraduate Degree Programme Regulations. These regulations are available via: www.drps.ed.ac.uk.) Name of student: Ana Victoria Gaxiola Lazcano UUN S1673765 University email: [email protected] Degree sought: Ph. D. in Sociology No. of words in the 60784 main text of thesis: Title of thesis: The Changing Party System in Mexico (1970-1988) Insert the lay summary text here - the space will expand as you type.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico: Prospects for Democracy
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive DSpace Repository Theses and Dissertations 1. Thesis and Dissertation Collection, all items 1996-12 Mexico: prospects for democracy Norton, Yvonne D. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/32026 Downloaded from NPS Archive: Calhoun NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS MEXICO: PROSPECTS FOR DEMOCRACY by Yvonne D. Norton December 1996 Thesis Co-Advisors: Mary P. Callahan Scott D. Tollefson Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 19970516 083 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this coUection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the coUection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this coUection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 1996 Master's Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE MEXICO: PROSPECTS FOR DEMOCRACY 5. FUNDING NUMBERS 6. AUTIIOR Yvonne D. Norton 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION Monterey CA 93943-5000 REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Vote Tally Confirms Overwhelming Victory for Ernesto Zedillo LADB Staff
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository SourceMex Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) 9-7-1994 Final Vote Tally Confirms Overwhelming Victory for Ernesto Zedillo LADB Staff Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/sourcemex Recommended Citation LADB Staff. "Final Vote Tally Confirms Overwhelming Victory for Ernesto Zedillo." (1994). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ sourcemex/3284 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in SourceMex by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LADB Article Id: 56541 ISSN: 1054-8890 Final Vote Tally Confirms Overwhelming Victory for Ernesto Zedillo by LADB Staff Category/Department: Mexico Published: 1994-09-07 According to the final vote count released on Aug. 28 by the Federal Electoral Institute (Instituto Federal Electoral, IFE), Ernesto Zedillo of the governing Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) won the Mexican presidential election with 50.18% of the vote. The IFE statistics showed that Diego Fernandez de Cevallos of the National Action Party (PAN) received 26.69% of the total vote, while another 17.08% was cast for Cuauhtemoc Cardenas of the Democratic Revolution Party (PRD). Zedillo's margin of victory is similar to the 50.78% of the vote President Carlos Salinas de Gortari is said to have received after the 1988 election. The PRI is widely believed to have committed massive fraud that year to give Salinas a large margin of victory. Nevertheless, the percentages received by both Salinas and Zedillo still represent a large decline from previous elections, when PRI candidates received at least 80% of the vote.
    [Show full text]
  • SOCIETY and ECONOMY in MEXICO Edited by JAMES W. WILKIE Foreword by Jeffrey Bortz
    SOCIETY AND ECONOMY IN MEXICO Edited by JAMES W. WILKIE Foreword by Jeffrey Bortz UCLA LATIN AMERICAN CENTER PUBLICATIONS University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, California 1990 UCLA Latin American Center Publications University of California Los Angeles, California 90024 Copyright © 1990 by The Regents of the University of California All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America The preparation of this volume was supported by a grant from The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Library of Congress Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data Society and economy in Mexico! edited by lames W. Wilkie; foreword by Jeffrey Bortz. p. em. ‐ (Statistical abstract of Latin America. Supplement series; suppl. 10) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0‐87903‐250‐2 I. Mexico‐Economic conditions‐1918‐ 2. Mexico‐Social conditions. I. Wilkie, James Wallace. II. Series. HC 135.S625 1990 33O.972'08‐dc20 89‐13205 CIP To the coeditors of the Statistical Abstract of Latin America, who have contributed greatly to the development of the UCLA Research Project on Statistical Measurement of Change in Latin America Stephen Haber, 1980‐83 David E. Lorey, 1986‐87 Enrique Ochoa, 1987 Adam Perkal, 1983‐86 Peter L. Reich, 1977‐80 Paul Turovsky, 1976‐77 Contents Foreword The Development of Historical Statistics on Mexico and Latin America ix Jeffrey Bortz Preface xiii Tables xvii Figures xxi Abbreviations and Symbols xxiii 1 The Six Ideological Phases of Mexico's "Permanent 1 Revolution" since 1910 James W. Wilkie 2 The Development of Engineering Expertise for Social and 71 Economic Modernization in Mexico since 1929 David E. Lorey 3 The Class Structure of Mexico, 1895‐1980 103 Stephanie Granato and Aida Mostkoff 4 Complexities of Measuring the Food Situation in Mexico: 117 Supply versus Self‐Sufficiency of Basic Grains, 1925‐86 Aida Mostkoff and Enrique C.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico's Democratization in Comparative
    P1: KNP 9780521877190pre CUNY1171/Greene 978 0 521 87719 0 June 23, 2007 20:54 This page intentionally left blank ii P1: KNP 9780521877190pre CUNY1171/Greene 978 0 521 87719 0 June 23, 2007 20:54 Why Dominant Parties Lose Why have dominant parties persisted in power for decades in countries spread across the globe? Why did most eventually lose? Why Dominant Parties Lose develops a theory of single-party dominance, its durabil- ity, and its breakdown into fully competitive democracy. Greene shows that dominant parties turn public resources into patronage goods to bias electoral competition in their favor and virtually win elections before election day without resorting to electoral fraud or bone-crushing repression. Opposition parties fail not because of limited voter demand or institutional constraints but because their resource disadvantages force them to form as niche parties with appeals that are out of step with the average voter. When the political economy of dominance – a large state and a politically quiescent public bureaucracy – erodes, the partisan playing field becomes fairer and opposition parties can expand into catchall competitors that threaten the dominant party at the polls. Greene uses this argument to show why Mexico transformed from a dominant party authoritarian regime under PRI rule to a fully competitive democracy. He also shows that this argument can account for single-party dominance in other countries where the surrounding regime is authoritarian (Malaysia and Taiwan) and where it is demo- cratic (Japan and Italy). The findings have implications for Mexico’s political future, the formation of new political parties, transitions to democracy, and the study of competitive authoritarianism.
    [Show full text]
  • MEXICO Date of Elections: 7 July 1985 Purpose of Elections Elections
    MEXICO Date of Elections: 7 July 1985 Purpose of elections Elections were held for all the seats in the Chamber of Deputies on the normal expiry of the members' term of office. Characteristics of Parliament The bicameral Parliament of Mexico, the National Congress, consists of the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate. The Chamber of Deputies currently has 400 members, of whom 300 are elected by majority vote and 100 according to proportional representation. All Deputies have 3-year terms of office. The Senate comprises 64 members elected for 6 years. Two members represent each of the country's 31 States and the Federal District. Electoral System All Mexican citizens who are at least 18 years of age and registered in their constituency of residence are entitled to vote. Excluded from this right are the insane, interned drug addicts, persons convicted of a crime involving liability to imprisonment and persons serving a prison sentence. Electoral registers are continually kept up to date. Voting is compulsory, abstention leading to a fine or imprisonment. All citizens by birth at least 21 years of age and in full possession of their political rights may stand for election to the Chamber of Deputies from their State or territory of origin or that in which they have resided for at least six months; the age requirement for Senators is 30. Neither Senators nor Deputies may be re-elected for a second consecutive term, but may stand again for subsequent terms. Ministers of religion, members of the federal army on active duty, police officers of a commanding rank within the district concerned, Secretaries or Under-Secretaries of State, Justices of the Supreme Court and Governors of the States are not eligible for the Congress; apart from ministers of religion, such disqualification can be overridden if the officials concerned resign from their positions 90 days before the election.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico at the Crossroads
    August 1994 Volume VI, Number 9 MEXICO AT THE CROSSROADS POLITICAL RIGHTS AND THE 1994 PRESIDENTIAL AND CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS On August 21, 1994, forty-five million Mexicans will go to the polls to INTRODUCTION................................................................................... 1 elect their new President and a new Congress. The ruling party, the Partido SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS.................................................... 3 Revolucionario Institucional (PRI), which has governed Mexico without THE IMPETUS FOR REFORM............................................................. 4 interruption since 1929, is facing a three CONTROL OF THE ELECTION PROCESS ...................................... 7 cornered contest, with the conservative but pro-democracy Partido de Acción RESOLUTION OF ELECTORAL DISPUTES..................................... 9 Nacional (PAN), and the left-of-center Partido de la Revolución Democrática THE DEFINITION OF ELECTORAL CRIMES (PRD). Six smaller parties are also AND THEIR PROSECUTION............................................................ 10 fielding presidential candidates.1 THE ELECTORAL REGISTER ........................................................... 11 Of the three main contenders, the POLLING-DAY SAFEGUARDS ........................................................ 13 PRI candidate, Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de León, a Yale-educated economist, was RURAL AREAS..................................................................................... 14 picked when
    [Show full text]
  • Neoliberalism Revisited NEOLIBERALISM REVISITED
    I V Neoliberalism Revisited NEOLIBERALISM REVISITED Economic Restructuring and Mexico's Political Future edited by GERARD 0 OTERO Simon Fraser University WestviewPress A Division of Portions of Chapters 1 and 12 by Gerardo Otero are from Gerardo Otero, "Mexico's Political Fu- Anthropology, 32(3):316-339 of Sociology and ' Canadian Review ture(s) in a Globalizing Economy, than Sociology and Anthropology Association. Reprinted with permission of the Cana Portions of Chapter 9 by Lynn Stephen are taken from Lynn Stephen, "Women in Mexico's Popu-Latin lar Movements: Survival Strategies Against Ecological and Economic impoverishment:' Perspectives, 19(l):73_96, copyright © 1992 by Sage Publications. Reprinted by permis- American sion of Sage Publications, Inc. All rights reserved, printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be re- form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photo- produced or transmitted in any copy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the publisher. Copyright © 1996 by Westview Press, Inc., A Division of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. Published in 1996 in the United States of America by WeStview Press, Inc., ssoo Central Avenue, Boulder, Colorado 80301-2877, and in the United Kingdom by WestvieW Press, 12 Hid's Copse Road, Cumnor Hill, Oxford 0X2 9JJ. A CIP catalog record of this book is available from the Library of Congress. Hardcover: ISBN 0813324408 paperback: ISBN 08I332441 6 S The paper used in this publication meets the requirements of the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for printed Library Materials Z39.48-1984.
    [Show full text]
  • A Positive Humanist Sexual Morality the Growth of Fundamentalism
    The New Inquisition in the Schools God and Morality Sidney Hook Naturalistic Humanism Corliss Lamont :. Don•t look,boy, WS a Secular humanistl.! A Positive Humanist Sexual Morality Robert Francoeur The Growth of Fundamentalism Worldwide How the Old Testament Was Written Gerald Larue Also: Founding the First Secular Humanist Center; More on Reincarnation; Update on Faith-Healing; Atheism in the Soviet N ...... Union; Anti-Abortion and Religion; Humanism in Mexico and Holland; and Polygamy and the Mormon Church Free In. u,r3% WINTER 1986/87, VOL. 7, NO. 1 ISSN 0272-0701 Contents 3 LETTERS TO THE EDITOR 14 PERSPECTIVE 62 CLASSIFIED 12 ON THE BARRICADES 60 IN THE NAME OF GOD 4 EDITORIALS The New Inquisition Paul Kurtz / Naturalistic Humanism, Corliss Lamont / God and Morality, Sidney Hook / Secular Humanist Center Founded, Tom Flynn / FREE INQutRY's Fifth Annual Conference ARTICLES 15 A Positive Humanist Statement on Sexual Morality Robert T. Francoeur 18 The Growth of Fundamentalism Worldwide: A Humanist Response Paul Kurtz BELIEF AND UNBELIEF WORLDWIDE 25 Unbelief in the Netherlands Rob Tielman 26 Dutch Humanism G. C. Soeters 27 Belief and Unbelief in Mexico Mario Mendez-Acosta 30 How the Old Testament Was Written Gerald A. Larue 38 The Case Against Reincarnation (Part 2) Paul Edwards VIEWPOINTS 49 Justice Rehnquist vs. the Founders Robert Heard 50 FREE INQUIRY in Court: Half a Loaf 51 Atheism Is Not Humanism: Reflections on a Visit to the Soviet Union Howard B. Radest 52 Communism, Secular Humanism, and AIDS Vern L. Bullough BOOKS 53 The Emperor's New Pornography Report William F.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Transition in Mexico: Case of City Juárez
    International Relations and Diplomacy, March 2017, Vol. 5, No. 3, 134-152 D doi: 10.17265/2328-2134/2017.03.002 DAVID PUBLISHING Democratic Transition in Mexico: Case of City Juárez Sergio Pacheco González Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez, Mexico Jesús Alberto Rodríguez Alonso Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Ciudad Juárez, Mexico The electronic and bibliographic sources, as well as some interviews and focus groups conducted in Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, all present interpretations by different actors on the so-called democratic transition in Mexico. The model, proposed Carothers (2002) to explain the transition from a dictatorship to democracy, as stage universally. This article shows which of the five assumptions of the model are present in the experience of the Mexican transition and those that were not consider applicable. He also argues that the model shows features of a teleological perspective, by omitting the particularities of each country, eliminating any reference to diversity and difference, becoming an ideological approach linked to the process of economic globalization. It criticizes the absence of discussion of social and economic objectives that should be priority in a conception of substantive democracy, rather than limiting the horizon of the transition to a liberal and normative conception, that assumes two basic formulas: (1) Democracy is equal to elections; and (2) a citizen is a vote. Contrasting documents on electoral disenchantment in Ciudad Juárez and the actions that various political actors have done, we can illustrate what can be termed substantive citizenship. Keywords: democratic transition, authoritarianism, electoral democracy, liberalization, political regime Introduction In June 5 of 2016, 12 States of the Mexican Republic held elections; the Partido Acción Nacional (National Action Party, PAN) won seven governorships, including that of Chihuahua, for the second time in history.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinton Visit to Mexico Defuses British Confrontation Scenario
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 24, Number 21, May 16, 1997 �J]rnNationa1 Clintonvisit to Mexico defuses British confrontation scenario by Valerie Rush "Collaboration," "partnership," and "sovereignty" were the ficationof Mexico, assisted by the British-backed U.S. media, watchwords of President William Clinton's three-day trip to which tried to smear the Zedillo government, Mexico's politi­ Mexico, which helped solidify both a personal relationship cal institutions, and its Armed Forces, as "hopelessly cor­ between the two heads of state, and a mutual respect between rupt." Only Clinton's decisive personal intervention stemmed their two countries. In various public appearances with Mexi­ the tide of slander and accusations, which were threatening can President Ernesto Zedillo throughout his visit, the U.S. to trigger political explosions inside Mexico. President was emphatic that he intends to be a good friend and Thus, Bill Clinton's May 5-7 visit to Mexico, with its neighbor to Mexico and to its sovereign institutions. Clinton's repeated emphasis on friendship and cooperation, once again commitment to Mexico's stability thwarted the intent of a defeated the British oligarchy's gameplan, which was to force British-backed campaign to provoke a violent confrontation a cancellation of the visit, or, failing that, to shape the environ­ between Mexico and the United States. ment with possibly violent protests against the American That campaign was launched earlier this year around the President. That scenario fizzled too, with only a few hundred annual certification President Clinton is required by law to leftist demonstrators making a pathetic showing to scream apply to the U.S.'s partners in the war on drugs.
    [Show full text]