MEXICO This File Contains Election Results for the Mexican Chamber Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

MEXICO This file contains election results for the Mexican Chamber of Deputies in 1997, 2000, 2003, 2006, 2009, and 2012. Year, Geography, and Turnout YEAR Election Year CIRC Circunscription (Regional Election District) STATENO State Number STATENAME State Name DISTNO Electoral District Number DISTNAME Electoral District Name SECTIONS Sections CASILLAS Casillas VALID Valid Ballots INVALID Invalid Ballots BALLOTS Ballots Cast LNOM Nominal List (Eligible Voters) Votes by Party PAN Partido Acción Nacional (National Action Party) PRI Partido Revolucionario Institucional (Institutional Revolutionary Party) PRD Partido de la Revolución Democrática (Party of the Democratic Revolution) PC Partido Cardenista (Cardenist Party) PT Partido del Trabajo (Labor Party) PVEM Partido Verde Ecologista de México (Ecologist Green Party of Mexico) PPS Partido Popular Socialista (Socialist People’s Party) PDM Partido Demócrata Mexicano (Mexican Democratic Party) AC Alianza por el Cambio (Alliance for Change), PAN and PVEM alliance AM Alianza por México (Alliance for Mexico), 2000 alliance of PRD, PT, CONV, PAS, and PSN PCD Partido de Centro Democrático (Democratic Center Party) PARM Partido Auténtico de la Revolución Mexicana (Authentic Party of the Mexican Revolution) DSPPN Democracia Social Partido Político Nacional (Social Democracy National Political Party) CONV Convergencia (Convergence), formerly Convergencia por la Democracia (Convergence for Democracy) MC Movimiento Ciudadano (Citizens’ Movement), formerly CONV PSN Partido de la Sociedad Nacionalista (Party of the Nationalist Society) PAS Partido Alianza Social (Social Alliance Party) MP México Posible (Possible Mexico) PLM Partido Liberal Mexicano (Mexican Liberal Party) FC Fuerza Ciudadana (Citizen Force Party) APT Alianza para Todos (Alliance for All), 2003 alliance of PRI and PVEM APM Alianza por México (Alliance for Mexico), 2006 alliance of PRI and PVEM PBT Coalición por el Bien de Todos (Coalition for the Good of All), alliance of PRD, CONV, and PT ASDC Partido Alternativa Socialdemócrata y Campesina (Social Democratic and Peasant Alternative Party) PSD Partido Socialdemócrata (Social Democratic Party), formerly ASDC PRIM_MEX Primero México (Mexico First) SALV_MEX Salvemos México (Save Mexico) PANAL Partido Nueva Alianza (New Alliance Party) NO_REG Unregistered Candidates Source: http://www.ife.org.mx/, Instituto Federal Electoral. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Emily Edmonds-Poli and David A. Shirk 2009- Contemporary Mexican Politics
CONTEMPORARY MEXICAN POLITICS EMILY EDMONDS-POLI and DAVID A. SHIRK ContempMexPolPBK.indd 1 10/16/08 12:23:29 PM #/.4%-0/2!29 -%8)#!.0/,)4)#3 CONTEMPORARY MEXIC AN POLITICS Emily Edmonds-Poli and David A. Shirk ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD PUBLISHERS, INC. Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD PUBLISHERS, INC. Published in the United States of America by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. A wholly owned subsidiary of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706 www.rowmanlittlefield.com Estover Road, Plymouth PL6 7PY, United Kingdom Copyright © 2009 by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Edmonds, Emily. Contemporary Mexican politics / Emily Edmonds-Poli and David A. Shirk. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-7425-4048-4 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-7425-4048-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-7425-4049-1 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-7425-4049-9 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Mexico--Politics and government--2000- I. Shirk, David A., 1971- II. Title. F1236.7.E36 2009 320.972--dc22 2008031594 Printed in the United States of America ™ The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992.
[Show full text]
Party Politics
Party Politics http://ppq.sagepub.com/ The PRI's Choice : Balancing Democratic Reform and its Own Salvation Adam Brinegar Duke, Scott Morgenstern and Daniel Nielson Party Politics 2006 12: 77 DOI: 10.1177/1354068806059345 The online version of this article can be found at: http://ppq.sagepub.com/content/12/1/77 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: Political Organizations and Parties Section of the American Political Science Association Additional services and information for Party Politics can be found at: Email Alerts: http://ppq.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://ppq.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://ppq.sagepub.com/content/12/1/77.refs.html >> Version of Record - Jan 12, 2006 What is This? Downloaded from ppq.sagepub.com at UNIV OF PITTSBURGH on February 21, 2013 PARTY POLITICS VOL 12. No.1 pp. 77–97 Copyright © 2006 SAGE Publications London Thousand Oaks New Delhi www.sagepublications.com THE PRI’S CHOICE Balancing Democratic Reform and Its Own Salvation Adam Brinegar, Scott Morgenstern and Daniel Nielson ABSTRACT This article explores the puzzle of why Mexico’s long-ruling Insti- tutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) implemented a series of electoral reforms in 1996 that precipitated its own downfall. Previous work explaining the process of Mexican democratization focuses on foreign pressures, interparty bargaining and a uniﬁed PRI. Alternatively, we argue that internal divisions in the PRI – conjoined with the threat of a presidential deal with the opposition – determined the particular shape of the reform. The article uses a bargaining model to illustrate the conjunction of interests between the President and PRI hard-liners while taking into account the shadow role played by the opposition.
[Show full text]
Mexico's Presidential Candidates Hernán Ancona C.*
Voices of Mexico /April • June, 1994 19 Mexico's presidential candidates Hernán Ancona C.* he political scene is set, the lights are on and the entire cast of nine actors have begun to deliver their fines with a vengeance; their supporters and the circumstances demand no less. TThe Mexican electorate can look forward to a wide range of political options including Luis Donaldo Colosio (PRI), Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas (PRD), Diego Fernández de Cevallos (PAN), Pablo Emilio Madero (UNO), Cecilia Soto (PT), Jorge González Torres (PVEM), Marcela Lombardo Otero (PPS), Rafael Aguilar Talamantes (PFCRN) and Alvaro Pérez Treviño (PARM). The candidates' initially lackluster performance was followed by a radical change, largely as a result of the uprising launched by the Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN). Although experts say the EZLN will not guarantee the transition to democracy with acts of violence, it has made the country's leaders aware that democracy has become a necessary pre-requisite for social peace. The terms of the new Federal Code of Electoral Institutions and Procedures have forced minority and so-called satellite ' parties to offer presidential candidates. The forthcoming August 21 elections will be the most hotly contested in the country's modem history. Yet while the number of candidates is the largest in recent years, only ina. t three candidates are thought to be really in the running: la Luis Donaldo Colosio, Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas and Diego en Fernández de Cevallos. / Imag The long list of candidates includes two women, who, Cruz io although little-known in the national political scene and ton virtually outside of the hard-fought contest, also form part An of this smorgasbord of options: Marcela Lombardo Otero Marco and Cecilia Soto González.
[Show full text]
Mexico-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress
Order Code IB10070 Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Mexico-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress Updated January 30, 2003 K. Larry Storrs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress CONTENTS SUMMARY MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS U.S.-Mexico Relationship Major Bilateral Linkages Fox Administration Economic and Social Challenges Political and Security Challenges Foreign Policy Challenges Bilateral Issues for Congress Trade Issues Functioning of NAFTA Institutions Recent Trade Disputes Immigration Issues Nature of the Immigration Problem Clinton Administration and Congressional Initiatives to Curb Immigration Bush Administration Initiatives Drug Trafficking Issues Nature of the Problem Presidential Certifications and Congressional Reactions Political and Human Rights Issues Concerns over Elections and Political Rights Allegations of Human Rights Abuses LEGISLATION FOR ADDITIONAL READING CRS Products IB10070 01-30-03 Mexico-U.S. Relations: Issues for Congress SUMMARY The United States and Mexico have a Drug Trafficking. After the January special relationship under the North American 2001 escape from prison of a major drug lord, Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), which President Fox announced a national crusade removes trade and investment barriers be- against drug trafficking and corruption. tween the countries. The friendly relationship During the February and September 2001 has been strengthened by President Bush’s Bush-Fox meetings, the leaders agreed to meetings with President Fox. Major issues of strengthen law enforcement cooperation. U.S. concern to Congress are trade, immigration, officials praised Mexico’s counter-narcotics drug trafficking, and political rights. efforts when the State Department issued the International Narcotics Control Strategy Trade.
[Show full text]
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES Original CSES file name: cses2_codebook_part3_appendices.txt (Version: Full Release - December 15, 2015) GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences Publication (pdf-version, December 2015) ============================================================================================= COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS (CSES) - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS APPENDIX II: PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS FULL RELEASE - DECEMBER 15, 2015 VERSION CSES Secretariat www.cses.org =========================================================================== HOW TO CITE THE STUDY: The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 3 FULL RELEASE [dataset]. December 15, 2015 version. doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15 These materials are based on work supported by the American National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov) under grant numbers SES-0451598 , SES-0817701, and SES-1154687, the GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, the University of Michigan, in-kind support of participating election studies, the many organizations that sponsor planning meetings and conferences, and the many organizations that fund election studies by CSES collaborators. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations. =========================================================================== IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING FULL RELEASES: This dataset and all accompanying documentation is the "Full Release" of CSES Module 3 (2006-2011). Users of the Final Release may wish to monitor the errata for CSES Module 3 on the CSES website, to check for known errors which may impact their analyses. To view errata for CSES Module 3, go to the Data Center on the CSES website, navigate to the CSES Module 3 download page, and click on the Errata link in the gray box to the right of the page.
[Show full text]
European Union Election Observation Mission Mexico 2006 FINAL REPORT
Final Report European Union Election Observation Mission Mexico 2006 FINAL REPORT This report was produced by the EU Election Observation Mission and presents the EU EOM’s findings on the 2006 Presidential and Parliamentary elections in Mexico. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. M E X I C O FINAL REPORT PRESIDENTIAL AND PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 2 July 2006 EUROPEAN UNION ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION 23 November 2006, Mexico City/Brussels TABLE OF CONTENT I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 II. INTRODUCTION 4 III. POLITICAL BACKGROUNG 5 A. Political Context 5 B. The Political Parties and Candidates 7 IV. LEGAL ISSUES 9 A. Political Organization of Mexico 9 B. Constitutional and Legal Framework 10 V. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION 11 A. Structure of the Election Administration 11 B. Performance of IFE 12 C. The General Council 13 VI. VOTER REGISTRATION 14 VII. REGISTRATION OF NATIONAL POLITICAL PARTIES 16 VIII. CANDIDATE REGISTRATION 17 IX. VOTING BY MEXICANS LIVING ABROAD 18 X. PARTICIPATION OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLE 19 XI. THE ‘CASILLAS ESPECIALES’ 20 XII. CIVIC AND VOTER EDUCATION 22 XIII. ELECTION CAMPAIGN 22 A. Campaign Environment and Conditions 22 B. Use of State Resources 23 C. Financing of Political Parties 25 D. Campaign Financing 26 XIV. PARTICIPATION OF CIVIL SOCIETY AND OBSERVATION 28 XV. MEDIA 29 A. Freedom of the Press 30 B. Legal Framework 31 C.
[Show full text]
Gaxiola Lazcano 2021.Pdf (1.560Mb)
This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. THE CHANGING PARTY SYSTEM IN MEXICO (1970-1988) Ana Victoria Gaxiola Lazcano Ph. D. in Sociology The University of Edinburgh 2020 Lay Summary of Thesis The lay summary is a brief summary intended to facilitate knowledge transfer and enhance accessibility, therefore the language used should be non-technical and suitable for a general audience. Guidance on the lay summary in a thesis. (See the Degree Regulations and Programmes of Study, General Postgraduate Degree Programme Regulations. These regulations are available via: www.drps.ed.ac.uk.) Name of student: Ana Victoria Gaxiola Lazcano UUN S1673765 University email: [email protected] Degree sought: Ph. D. in Sociology No. of words in the 60784 main text of thesis: Title of thesis: The Changing Party System in Mexico (1970-1988) Insert the lay summary text here - the space will expand as you type.
[Show full text]
Mexico's Political History
Order Code RS22368 January 26, 2006 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Mexico’s Political History: From Revolution to Alternation, 1910-2006 K. Larry Storrs Specialist in Latin American Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Summary This brief overview of Mexico’s political history from 1910 to 2006, with emphasis on electoral reforms and elections, demonstrates that Mexico has evolved from long- term domination by a single party to alternation and effective competition among the three major parties. This report sets the stage for the approaching July 2006 elections. Mexico’s Early History With a history dating to the Aztec indigenous culture and Spanish colonial rule, Mexico achieved independence in 1821. In the subsequent period, the country suffered many divisive and autocratic influences, although there was a period of reform under Benito Juarez’s two phases of presidential rule (1858-1862, 1867-1872). One major dictator was Antonio Lopez de Santa Ana (1833-1855), under whom the country lost vast northern territories to the United States — Texas in 1836, and the southwest region of the United States in 1846-1848 in the Mexican-American War. Another dictator was the Archduke Maxmillian of Austria (1864-67) who was imposed by Napoleon III of France as the Emporer of Mexico. Still another dictator was Porfirio Diaz (1877-1911), who attempted to modernize the country by encouraging foreign investment. Toward the end of his reign, he faced mounting social discontent that culminated in the turbulent Mexican Revolution that ousted Diaz and established a new order. Mexico’s 1910 Revolution and the Dominant Role of the PRI The Mexican Revolution was launched in 1910, with various goals being espoused by the diverse revolutionary groups.
[Show full text]
Mexico: Prospects for Democracy
Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive DSpace Repository Theses and Dissertations 1. Thesis and Dissertation Collection, all items 1996-12 Mexico: prospects for democracy Norton, Yvonne D. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/32026 Downloaded from NPS Archive: Calhoun NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS MEXICO: PROSPECTS FOR DEMOCRACY by Yvonne D. Norton December 1996 Thesis Co-Advisors: Mary P. Callahan Scott D. Tollefson Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 19970516 083 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this coUection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the coUection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this coUection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 1996 Master's Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE MEXICO: PROSPECTS FOR DEMOCRACY 5. FUNDING NUMBERS 6. AUTIIOR Yvonne D. Norton 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION Monterey CA 93943-5000 REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
[Show full text]
Final Vote Tally Confirms Overwhelming Victory for Ernesto Zedillo LADB Staff
University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository SourceMex Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) 9-7-1994 Final Vote Tally Confirms Overwhelming Victory for Ernesto Zedillo LADB Staff Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/sourcemex Recommended Citation LADB Staff. "Final Vote Tally Confirms Overwhelming Victory for Ernesto Zedillo." (1994). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ sourcemex/3284 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Latin America Digital Beat (LADB) at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in SourceMex by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LADB Article Id: 56541 ISSN: 1054-8890 Final Vote Tally Confirms Overwhelming Victory for Ernesto Zedillo by LADB Staff Category/Department: Mexico Published: 1994-09-07 According to the final vote count released on Aug. 28 by the Federal Electoral Institute (Instituto Federal Electoral, IFE), Ernesto Zedillo of the governing Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) won the Mexican presidential election with 50.18% of the vote. The IFE statistics showed that Diego Fernandez de Cevallos of the National Action Party (PAN) received 26.69% of the total vote, while another 17.08% was cast for Cuauhtemoc Cardenas of the Democratic Revolution Party (PRD). Zedillo's margin of victory is similar to the 50.78% of the vote President Carlos Salinas de Gortari is said to have received after the 1988 election. The PRI is widely believed to have committed massive fraud that year to give Salinas a large margin of victory. Nevertheless, the percentages received by both Salinas and Zedillo still represent a large decline from previous elections, when PRI candidates received at least 80% of the vote.
[Show full text]
King and Karabell BS
k o No. 4, 2006 o l Mexico’s Last Chance: Can Felipe Calderón t Deliver the Goods? u By Roger F. Noriega O By the narrowest of margins in the July 2 elections, Mexicans apparently have backed away from a precipice and won a precious second chance to save their country. Assuming the results are certified by September 6, Mexico’s n political class, led by president-elect Felipe Calderón, must now deliver a reform agenda that will both sustain a economic growth and overcome the structural poverty that keeps that nation from realizing its full potential. If the political class fails, it will forfeit Mexico’s future, converting the United States’s southern neighbor into a chronic c i problem rather than a thriving partner. r The extraordinarily competitive, democratic elec- won a series of regional primaries to wrest the e tions Mexico held on July 2 are perhaps the great- nomination from Fox’s preferred successor, Santi- est legacy of President Vicente Fox Quesada. Six ago Creel. Had the PRI rank-and-file been allowed m years ago, Fox defeated the political machine of the to choose its nominee from among a cadre of Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) that had modern, able state governors, the once-omnipotent controlled power in Mexico for over seventy years. party might have claimed more than 22 percent A His audacious campaign and surprising victory of the national vote. Instead, unreconstructed party raised expectations that his reform-minded boss Roberto Madrazo claimed the PRI nomination n government would make great strides modernizing as if it were his personal property, and voters never i Mexico, both economically and politically.
[Show full text]
Mexico's 2000 Presidential, Legislative, Gubernatorial and Local
MEXICO PRE-ELECTION ASSESSMENT MISSION REPORT #1 February 28-March 1, 2000 Issued May 8, 2000 I. INTRODUCTION On July 2, 2000, Mexican voters will go to the polls to elect Mexico’s president and that country’s 58th Federal Congress—all 500 seats in the Chamber of Deputies and all 128 seats in the Senate. In addition to the federal elections, citizens in the states of Morelos and Guanajuato will cast votes to elect their governor. Citizens in nine states—Campeche, Colima, Guanajuato, Mexico State, Morelos, Nuevo Leon, Queretaro, San Luis Potosi, and Sonora—will cast votes in contests for state congresses, and municipal councils. Finally, in Mexico City, voters will elect the mayor (jefe de gobierno), the legislative assembly and—for the first time—all 16 city delegates. The election of Mexico City’s delegates is yet another breakthrough toward providing representative, accountable government. The delegates formerly were appointed by the mayor. These upcoming elections come at a decisive juncture in the country’s transition to democracy, for the following reasons: C Recent polls indicate that this upcoming contest is the most highly contested presidential election in the 71 years that the ruling Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) has been in power. C For the first time, both major opposition political parties—the National Action Party (PAN) and the Democratic Revolutionary Party (PRD)—have formed separate alliances to enhance their respective electoral competitiveness. Although there are a total of 11 political parties registered with IFE to compete in the upcoming elections, the strategic alliances have reduced the actual number of presidential candidates to six.
[Show full text]