DOCSLIB.ORG

The Muslim World Expands: 1300 - 1700 Chapter 18, Pages 504 to 525 World History: Patterns of Interaction Mcdougal-Littell 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Muslim World Expands: 1300 - 1700 Chapter 18, Pages 504 to 525 World History: Patterns of Interaction Mcdougal-Littell 2007 The Muslim World Expands: 1300 - 1700 Chapter 18, Pages 504 to 525 World History: Patterns of Interaction McDougal-Littell 2007 The Byzantine Empire was once strong: in the year 550 A.D., when Justinian ruled it, in included not only all of Greece, Turkey, and Yugoslavia, but much of the Mediterranean world. By the year 1300, however, it was smaller and weaker. Turkey, also called ‘Anatolia,’ was now largely governed by the Seljuk Turks, a Muslim group which took most of the area from the Byzantines, who now had only a small region around the city of Constantinople. The Seljuks saw themselves as “ghazis” – Islamic warriors. Although strong against the Byzantines, the Seljuks were being attacked on the other side by Muslims from Arabia. In 1300, a leader named Osman declared himself independent from the Seljuks, and established his own empire, the Ottoman Empire. This new Islamic power would find success because of its use of gunpowder. The Ottoman armies had both muskets and cannons. The expansion of the Ottoman Empire was temporarily stopped in 1402 by Tamerlane, a Muslim leader from Samarkand, a city in Uzbekistan. Tamerlane was fighting his way west from Asia, while the Ottomans were advancing to east from Anatolia. After a few years, the Ottomans were able to resume their eastward expansion. The Ottomans also expanded westward. In 1453 they attacked and defeated the city of Constantinople. They renamed the city Istanbul; earlier it was called Byzantium. Many of the scientists, scholars, and artists fled for safety went to Italy. The Ottomans expanded southward, conquering Arabia and parts of northern Africa. The Muslim Ottomans captured Islam’s holy cities, Mecca and Medina, from the Arab Muslims. The Safavid kingdom of Persia was able to resist Ottoman attacks. Suleyman the Magnificent, inheriting the Ottoman throne in 1520, expanded the empire even further: he attacked and conquered the city of Belgrade in 1521, and within the next few years invaded Greece, Hungary, and Yugoslavia. He attacked Vienna but did not succeed in subjugating it. He strictly enforced Sharia law. The Ottomans were not the only Islamic empire to go on the offensive; in 1499, a small kingdom known as the Savafids took over all of Persia under the leadership of Isma’il. The Safavid invasion of Persia was one Islamic group attacking another. The border between the Savafid-occupied Persia and the Ottoman-occupied- Babylonia is the modern-day border between Iraq and Iran. Isma’il was a religious Chapter 18 – Page 1 tyrant, killing thousands who did not practice Islam according to his ideas. After Isma’il died, later Safavid rulers used artillery and other military forces to expand the empire into the Caucasus Mountains, an area northeast of Anatolia. There, the Safavid Muslims oppressed and subjugated Christians. Further east, other empires were taking shape. Since the 700’s, Muslims had been attacking India. For several centuries, they could move no farther than the Indus River valley. Around the year 1000, well-trained Turkish Muslims swept into India. They devastated Indian cities and temples in brutal campaigns. They formed a loose empire, called the Delhi Sultanate, of Islamic warlords with a capital in Delhi, and treated Indian Hindus as conquered people. Although Tamerlane attacked the Sultanate in 1398 and did much damage, he did not defeat it. From the area of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, the Muslim leader Babur and his grandson Akbar moved southward with large armies and artillery, defeating the Delhi Sultanate and establishing the Mughal Empire in India. Akbar saw military power as the root of his strength, and used powerful artillery; he died in 1605. Akbar’s grandson continued the empire and built the famous Taj Mahal; but this grandson, named Shah Jahan, allowed the ordinary people starve, while taxing them and organizing wars. When Shah Jahan became ill, his four sons competed for the throne. Aurangzeb was the one who managed to kill or outsmart the other three; he jailed his father and took power. He rigidly enforced Islamic laws; he enforced the hated tax on non-Muslims; he banned the construction of new Hindu temples and had Hindu monuments destroyed – despite the fact that the Hindus were the original inhabitants of the land, and the majority, while the Muslim minority had only recently arrived as military oppressors. When Aurangzeb’s army violently put down Hindu rebellions, he increased taxes on non-Muslims to pay for the military. Taxed and starving, the strength of the empire began to fade. In 1661, Aurangzeb greeted Portuguese explorers, and gave them the right to use the harbor of Bombay, also known as ‘Mumbai.’ Aurangzeb was willing to do business with the Portuguese, even though they weren’t Muslims, because he needed the financing. The ordinary people found the Portuguese interesting, and found that they were more lenient that Aurangzeb. The Mughal Empire soon ceased to have significance. Chapter 18 – Page 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Stage and Inheritance
    1 The Stage and Inheritance he Indian subcontinent is the only subcontinent in the world. That in itself Ttells us that India possesses a unique geography while also being intrinsi- cally linked to the larger continent, Asia. These two impulses, a pull toward engagement as part of a larger whole and a push to be apart due to a unique ge- ography, have influenced India’s history and behavior through the ages and have determined the nature of her engagement with the world. Geography matters because it has consequences for policy, worldviews, and history. The “big geography” of Eurasia, to which the Indian subcontinent is at- tached, divides that landmass into a series of roughly parallel ecological zones, determined largely by latitude, ranging from tropical forest in the south to northern tundra. In between these extremes, are temperate woodlands and grasslands, desert-steppe, forest-steppe, the forest, and more open taiga. The zone of mixed grassland and woodland was the ecological niche for settled ag- riculture to develop in two areas—in southwest Asia, from the Nile valley to the Indus valley, and in southeast Asia including China—where civilizations, states, and empires grew. Of the two, its geography enabled southwest Asia to communicate easily. Throughout history, from the Nile to the Indus and later the Ganga, exchanges, migrations, and change were the rule with civilizations growing and developing in contact with one another even though they were separate geographically.1 The topography of the Indian subcontinent is open on three sides: the west, south, and east and is blocked off to the north by the Himalayan range.
    [Show full text]
  • “Gunpowder Empires” of the Islamic World During the Early Modern Era (1450-1750)! India 3 Continents: SE Europe, N
    Let’s review the three “Gunpowder Empires” of the Islamic World during the Early Modern Era (1450-1750)! India 3 continents: SE Europe, N. Africa, SW Asia Persia (Iran today) Longest lasting- existed until the end of World War I Ended when Europeans (specifically the British) gained control Had a powerful army with artillery (muskets and cannons) Defeated the Safavids at the Battle of Chaldiran- set the Iran/Iraq boundary today Established by Turkish Muslim warriors Claimed descent from Mongols Ruled over a largely Hindu population Ruled over a diverse population with many Christians and Jews Leader called a sultan Leader called a shah Had emperors Religiously tolerant New syncretic belief: Sikhism Shi’a Sunni Defeated the Byzantine Empire- seized Constantinople The Persian spoken began to incorporate Arabic words Followed after the Delhi Sultanate Answer Key OTTOMAN EMPIRE SAFAVID EMPIRE MUGHAL EMPIRE ● 3 continents: SE Europe, N. ● Persia (Iran today) ● India Africa, SW Asia ● Had a powerful army with ● Ended when Europeans ● Longest-lasting: existed until artillery (muskets and cannons) (specifically the British) gained the end of World War I ● Leader called a shah control of India ● Had a powerful army with ● Religiously tolerant ● Had a powerful army with artillery (muskets and cannons) ● Shi’a artillery (muskets and cannons) ● Defeated Safavids at the Battle ● The Persian spoken began to ● Established by people of Chaldiran- set the Iran/Iraq incorporate Arabic words descended from Turkish Muslim boundary today warriors ● Established
    [Show full text]
  • Theocracy Metin M. Coşgel Thomas J. Miceli
    Theocracy Metin M. Coşgel University of Connecticut Thomas J. Miceli University of Connecticut Working Paper 2013-29 November 2013 365 Fairfield Way, Unit 1063 Storrs, CT 06269-1063 Phone: (860) 486-3022 Fax: (860) 486-4463 http://www.econ.uconn.edu/ This working paper is indexed on RePEc, http://repec.org THEOCRACY by Metin Coşgel* and Thomas J. Miceli** Abstract: Throughout history, religious and political authorities have had a mysterious attraction to each other. Rulers have established state religions and adopted laws with religious origins, sometimes even claiming to have divine powers. We propose a political economy approach to theocracy, centered on the legitimizing relationship between religious and political authorities. Making standard assumptions about the motivations of these authorities, we identify the factors favoring the emergence of theocracy, such as the organization of the religion market, monotheism vs. polytheism, and strength of the ruler. We use two sets of data to test the implications of the model. We first use a unique data set that includes information on over three hundred polities that have been observed throughout history. We also use recently available cross-country data on the relationship between religious and political authorities to examine these issues in current societies. The results provide strong empirical support for our arguments about why in some states religious and political authorities have maintained independence, while in others they have integrated into a single entity. JEL codes: H10,
    [Show full text]
  • Quantitative Dynamics of Human Empires
    Quantitative Dynamics of Human Empires Cesare Marchetti and Jesse H. Ausubel FOREWORD Humans are territorial animals, and most wars are squabbles over territory. become global. And, incidentally, once a month they have their top managers A basic territorial instinct is imprinted in the limbic brain—or our “snake meet somewhere to refresh the hierarchy, although the formal motives are brain” as it is sometimes dubbed. This basic instinct is central to our daily life. to coordinate business and exchange experiences. The political machinery is Only external constraints can limit the greedy desire to bring more territory more viscous, and we may have to wait a couple more generations to see a under control. With the encouragement of Andrew Marshall, we thought it global empire. might be instructive to dig into the mechanisms of territoriality and their role The fact that the growth of an empire follows a single logistic equation in human history and the future. for hundreds of years suggests that the whole process is under the control In this report, we analyze twenty extreme examples of territoriality, of automatic mechanisms, much more than the whims of Genghis Khan namely empires. The empires grow logistically with time constants of tens to or Napoleon. The intuitions of Menenius Agrippa in ancient Rome and of hundreds of years, following a single equation. We discovered that the size of Thomas Hobbes in his Leviathan may, after all, be scientifically true. empires corresponds to a couple of weeks of travel from the capital to the rim We are grateful to Prof. Brunetto Chiarelli for encouraging publication using the fastest transportation system available.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-22 AP World History Summer Assignment Mr. Le Clainche Hello
    2021-22 AP World History Summer Assignment Mr. Le Clainche Hello everyone, Click on the link below to watch a presentation about the AP World History course. You will have to complete a small task on Loom after watching the video. Then, proceed with the rest of your summer assignment. https://www.loom.com/share/2fe7877bd1b04215b2da85b912f3ea60 2021-22 AP World History Summer Assignment Mr. Le Clainche Welcome to AP World History! The redesigned course in 2019-20 is a college level course that will cover over 800 years of human history. It is designed to develop your critical thinking and reading skills in preparation for not only the AP Exam but also for other AP and college courses you will take throughout your academic career. With this class comes a great deal of responsibility including maintain rigorous reading habits schedule, preparing for several challenging quizzes and tests, retaining knowledge throughout the year, and learning from critique so that you can improve your skills. If you do not think you are ready for these responsibilities, then I would encourage you to look for an alternate course. Our drop-add period is the first two weeks of school, August 31st - September 11th. During this period you will have opportunity to drop this course if you feel it is in your best interest. I would encourage you to at least wait out the first week and to speak with both myself and your academic advisor before you make the decision. For this class, you will need a laptop and Microsoft Word. You will use pen/pencils on the AP quizzes and tests in class.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottoman-Aceh Relations As Documented in Turkish Sources
    CHAPTER IV Ottoman-Aceh relations as documented in Turkish sources İsmail Hakkı Göksoy Despite the distance between them, Turkey and Aceh managed to establish commercial, diplomatic and military relations, most extensively in the sixteenth and nineteenth centuries. The main aim of this chapter is to examine these rela- tions using Ottoman sources. Most of these sources for sixteenth-century rela- tions can be found in the Mühimme records issued by the Divan-ı Humayun (Ottoman Imperial Council), some of which are now available in published form. These offi cial records document the arrival of Aceh envoys in Istanbul and their request for military aid from Turkey, as well as the preparation of a navy campaign to Sumatra in support of Aceh in 1567. As for nineteenth- century relations, Ottoman sources focus on the arrival of Aceh delegations in Istanbul in 1851 and 1873. These sources come from various government offi ces, and mention the renewal of Acehnese promises of loyalty from the six- teenth century and Acehnese requests for protection from the Ottoman Empire. Connections with Southeast Asia go back as far as the twelfth century. Turkic traders, following the Arabs, Persians and Indian Muslims, began to participate in the international trade between West Asia and China after the establishment of the Seljuk rule in western Asia in the second half of the eleventh century. As demonstrated by Affan Seljuk, Turkic participation in this trade with the Indonesian Archipelago took place during the last period of the Abbasids in Baghdad (Seljuk 1980:302-3). The presence of the Turks in the region was recorded by the famous North African Muslim traveller Ibn Battuta (d.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Michal Biran, Jonathan Brack, and Francesca Fiaschetti
    Introduction michal biran, jonathan brack, and francesca fiaschetti In the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, Chinggis Khan and his heirs established and ruled the largest contiguous empire in world history, an empire that, at its height, extended from Korea to Hungary, and from Iraq, Tibet, and Burma to Siberia. Ruling over roughly two-thirds of the Old World and profoundly impacting also regions beyond its reach, the Mongol Empire created remarkable mobility across Eurasia, with peo- ple, ideas, and artifacts traversing vast geographical distances and cul- tural boundaries. The exchange of goods, people, germs, and more had far-reaching consequences for the Eurasian political, cultural, and eco- nomic dynamics. Introducing new commercial, diplomatic, and intel- lectual networks, but also revitalizing ancient ones, the Mongol Empire significantly advanced the integration of the Old World. At the center of these transformations were the Silk Roads, the various trade routes—continental and maritime—that connected East Asia mainly to the Islamic world and Europe, and flourished under Mongol rule. Although the term “Silk Road” was introduced only in the late nine- teenth century,1 the various roads that crisscrossed the Old World, from east to west and north to south, were used, in changing constellations and volumes of traffic, already in prehistorical times.2 The Mongol era marked a new stage in the history of the Silk Roads, due not only to the growth in volume and scope of the traffic that they channeled. Prior to the Mongol conquests, trade on the Silk Roads was mainly relay trade. Merchants did not travel themselves the entire distance 1 2 | Introduction from eastern to western Eurasia; rather, trade was carried out in shorter circuits, eventually linking East Asia and the Islamic world or Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Narrative and Iranian
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Narrative and Iranian Identity in the New Persian Renaissance and the Later Perso-Islamicate World DISSERTATION submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in History by Conrad Justin Harter Dissertation Committee: Professor Touraj Daryaee, Chair Professor Mark Andrew LeVine Professor Emeritus James Buchanan Given 2016 © 2016 Conrad Justin Harter DEDICATION To my friends and family, and most importantly, my wife Pamela ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS v CURRICULUM VITAE vi ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION vii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 2: Persian Histories in the 9th-12th Centuries CE 47 CHAPTER 3: Universal History, Geography, and Literature 100 CHAPTER 4: Ideological Aims and Regime Legitimation 145 CHAPTER 5: Use of Shahnama Throughout Time and Space 192 BIBLIOGRAPHY 240 iii LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1 Map of Central Asia 5 iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to all of the people who have made this possible, to those who have provided guidance both academic and personal, and to all those who have mentored me thus far in so many different ways. I would like to thank my advisor and dissertation chair, Professor Touraj Daryaee, for providing me with not only a place to study the Shahnama and Persianate culture and history at UC Irvine, but also with invaluable guidance while I was there. I would like to thank my other committee members, Professor Mark LeVine and Professor Emeritus James Given, for willing to sit on my committee and to read an entire dissertation focused on the history and literature of medieval Iran and Central Asia, even though their own interests and decades of academic research lay elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • India & Mongolia in the Middle Ages – More Than Just a Connection
    Ancient History of Asian Countries India & Mongolia in the Middle Ages – More Than Just a Connection By Mohan Gopal Author Mohan Gopal The Taj Mahal area and traced his lineage to a line of Turkic-Mongol warlords who alternately plagued, plundered, ruled and governed in greater or If there is one monument which conjures up an image of India, it lesser components a vast region which roughly spans the areas of is the Taj Mahal. It was constructed c. 1631 at the behest of Emperor present-day Turkey, southern Russia, the northern Middle East, Shah Jahan as the ultimate memorial and place of eternal rest for his central Asia, northern Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and northern India. beloved wife, Mumtaj. The Taj, as it is commonly referred to, is for The most commonly known name in this lineage was Tamerlane, romanticists across the globe, the ultimate architectural poem of love born in 1336 in central Asia, also known as Timur the Lame, Timur etched in white marble with floral motifs inlaid with precious stones; the Great or Timur the Horrible, depending on which perspective one a monument of perfect geometrical balance and symmetry. In this took – that of his huge territorial conquests or the countless and mausoleum lie the tombs of Emperor Shah Jahan and his beloved endless massacres and lootings which formed the basis of them. queen. Babur chose the former perspective and with pride considered It may come as a surprise to many that this widely admired, loved himself a Timurid, a descendant of the mighty Timur. and romanticized world artefact which has come to be known as a Babur’s mother was Qutlugh Nigar Khanum.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Muslims, Ottoman Empire and Caliphate During Colonial Period
    International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 6, No. 2; February 2015 Indian Muslims, Ottoman Empire and Caliphate during Colonial Period Salih Pay Associate Professor Department of History of Islam, Faculty of Theology Uludağ University, Bursa Turkey Abstract Indian Muslim is a term applied for Muslims living in the Indian Subcontinent comprised of the modern day states of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar and Sri Lanka. India witnessed the first Muslim raids during the era of the Rashidun, and permanent dominance of Islam began in the Umayyad period upon the conquest of Sindh. Nevertheless, it was Turkish Muslim states, from Ghaznavids to Mughals, which ensured the spreading of Islam in other regions. In the 15th century, the Portuguese were the first to arrive on Indian coasts, before they were subject to raids by Western colonialist states such as Holland, England and France. By the middle of the 19th century, India entirely fell under the British rule. In those days, under guidance of their scholars and leading personalities, Indian Muslims looked for ways to get rid of the British rule. Besides, they provided both moral and material support so that the Ottoman Empire, as the only independent state within Islamic world, and the Caliphate [Khilafat] survive without surrendering to the British or other colonial dominance. The objective of this study is to analyze how Muslims in the Indian Subcontinent who were totally deprived of independence as a British colony, paid close attention to the Ottomans and the Caliphate. Keywords: Islamic World, Indian Muslims, Ottoman Empire, Caliphate, English Colonialism Introduction Indian Subcontinent, also known as South Asia, includes modern states of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar and Sri Lanka.
    [Show full text]
  • 7Western Europe and Byzantium
    Western Europe and Byzantium circa 500 - 1000 CE 7Andrew Reeves 7.1 CHRONOLOGY 410 CE Roman army abandons Britain 476 CE The general Odavacar deposes last Western Roman Emperor 496 CE The Frankish king Clovis converts to Christianity 500s CE Anglo-Saxons gradually take over Britain 533 CE Byzantine Empire conquers the Vandal kingdom in North Africa 535 – 554 CE Byzantine Empire conquers the Ostrogothic kingdom in Italy 560s CE Lombard invasions of Italy begin 580s CE The Franks cease keeping tax registers 597 CE Christian missionaries dispatched from Rome arrive in Britain 610 – 641 CE Heraclius is Byzantine emperor 636 CE Arab Muslims defeat the Byzantine army at the Battle of Yarmouk 670s CE Byzantine Empire begins to lose control of the Balkans to Avars, Bulgars, and Slavs 674 – 678 CE Arabs lay siege to Constantinople but are unsuccessful 711 CE Muslims from North Africa conquer Spain, end of the Visigothic kingdom 717 – 718 CE Arabs lay siege to Constantinople but are unsuccessful 717 CE Leo III becomes Byzantine emperor. Under his rule, the Iconoclast Controversy begins. 732 CE King Charles Martel of the Franks defeats a Muslim invasion of the kingdom at the Battle of Tours 751 CE The Byzantine city of Ravenna falls to the Lombards; Pepin the Short of the Franks deposes the last Merovingian king and becomes king of the Franks; King Pepin will later conquer Central Italy and donate it to the pope 750s CE Duke of Naples ceases to acknowledge the authority of the Byzantine emperor 770s CE Effective control of the city of Rome passes from Byzantium to the papacy c.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of the Sultanate Period
    Sources of the Sultanate Period A large number of literary sources are available for the medieval period. They provide a more reliable information and insight about the life of the people of the period. These sources inform us of the administrative set up of the rulers, their theory of kingship, military achievements etc. They also reflect the state of cultural, economic, political and religious institutions. We should keep in view the following points while utilizing these sources: (1) Absolute historical truth is elusive, (2) Absolute impartial history is rather impossible, (3) Every kind of prejudice, caste, faith, personal racial, regional and religious etc., possessed by the historian has exercised some influence in recording events and facts, (4) All possible efforts need to be made to sift facts from fiction, (5) Since most of the books were written on the command of the rulers or by them, they contain material which has to be treated with care and caution, (6) Different sources to be used while arriving at some definite conclusion. Important Chronicles: Kamilut-Tawarikh of Ibnul Asir: For the history of Central Asia and the Rise of the Shansabani Dynasty of Ghor, the Kamilut-Tawarikh of Ibnul Asir gives us a lot of information. The book was completed in 1230. The author was a contemporary to many of the events narrated in the last two volumes of his work He used a critical judgment in utilizing his sources of information and the result was that his account has rarely been found to be wrong. As regards his notices of Indian affairs, those are remarkably correct so far as the dates and essential facts are concerned.
    [Show full text]