The Basic Biology of Apis Mellifera, the Western Honeybee
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Hymenoptera (Stinging Wasps)
Return to insect order home Page 1 of 3 Visit us on the Web: www.gardeninghelp.org Insect Order ID: Hymenoptera (Stinging Wasps) Life Cycle–Complete metamorphosis: Queens or solitary adults lay eggs. Larvae eat, grow and molt. This stage is repeated a varying number of times, depending on species, until hormonal changes cause the larvae to pupate. Inside a cell (in nests) or a pupal case (solitary), they change in form and color and develop wings. The adults look completely different from the larvae. Solitary wasps: Social wasps: Adults–Stinging wasps have hard bodies and most have membranous wings (some are wingless). The forewing is larger than the hindwing and the two are hooked together as are all Hymenoptera, hence the name "married wings," but this is difficult to see. Some species fold their wings lengthwise, making their wings look long and narrow. The head is oblong and clearly separated from the thorax, and the eyes are compound eyes, but not multifaceted. All have a cinched-in waist (wasp waist). Eggs are laid from the base of the ovipositor, while the ovipositor itself, in most species, has evolved into a stinger. Thus only females have stingers. (Click images to enlarge or orange text for more information.) Oblong head Compound eyes Folded wings but not multifaceted appear Cinched in waist long & narrow Return to insect order home Page 2 of 3 Eggs–Colonies of social wasps have at least one queen that lays both fertilized and unfertilized eggs. Most are fertilized and all fertilized eggs are female. Most of these become workers; a few become queens. -
Ecology, Behaviour and Control of Apis Cerana with a Focus on Relevance to the Australian Incursion
Insects 2013, 4, 558-592; doi:10.3390/insects4040558 OPEN ACCESS insects ISSN 2075-4450 www.mdpi.com/journal/insects/ Review Ecology, Behaviour and Control of Apis cerana with a Focus on Relevance to the Australian Incursion Anna H. Koetz Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, 21-23 Redden St., Portsmith, QLD 4870, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-419-726-698; Fax: +61-7-4057-3690 Received: 27 June 2013; in revised form: 13 September 2013 / Accepted: 24 September 2013 / Published: 21 October 2013 Abstract: Apis cerana Fabricius is endemic to most of Asia, where it has been used for honey production and pollination services for thousands of years. Since the 1980s, A. cerana has been introduced to areas outside its natural range (namely New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, and Australia), which sparked fears that it may become a pest species that could compete with, and negatively affect, native Australian fauna and flora, as well as commercially kept A. mellifera and commercial crops. This literature review is a response to these concerns and reviews what is known about the ecology and behaviour of A. cerana. Differences between temperate and tropical strains of A. cerana are reviewed, as are A. cerana pollination, competition between A. cerana and A. mellifera, and the impact and control strategies of introduced A. cerana, with a particular focus on gaps of current knowledge. Keywords: Apis cerana; Apis mellifera; incursion; pest species; Australia; pollination; competition; distribution; control 1. Introduction Apis cerana Fabricius (also known as the Asian honeybee, Asiatic bee, Asian hive bee, Indian honeybee, Indian bee, Chinese bee, Mee bee, Eastern honeybee, and Fly Bee) is endemic to most of Asia where it has been used for honey production and pollination services for thousands of years. -
Aggregations of Unrelated Apis Florea Colonies Wandee Wattanachaiyingcharoen, Siriwat Wongsiri, Benjamin P
Aggregations of unrelated Apis florea colonies Wandee Wattanachaiyingcharoen, Siriwat Wongsiri, Benjamin P. Oldroyd To cite this version: Wandee Wattanachaiyingcharoen, Siriwat Wongsiri, Benjamin P. Oldroyd. Aggregations of unrelated Apis florea colonies. Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 2008, 39 (5), pp.531-536. hal-00891920 HAL Id: hal-00891920 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00891920 Submitted on 1 Jan 2008 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie 39 (2008) 531–536 Available online at: c INRA/DIB-AGIB/ EDP Sciences, 2008 www.apidologie.org DOI: 10.1051/apido:2008045 Original article Aggregations of unrelated Apis florea colonies* Wandee Wattanachaiyingcharoen1, Siriwat Wongsiri2,BenjaminP.Oldroyd3 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10320, Thailand 3 Behaviour and Genetics of Social Insects Lab, School of Biological Sciences A12, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Received 5 July 2007 – Revised 25 March 2008 – Accepted 13 May 2008 Abstract – Intensive surveys of an area of woodland in Phitsanulok province, Thailand, revealed 15 colonies of Apis florea. The colonies had a highly aggregated spatial distribution (Standardized Morisita’s Index of Dispersion = 0.59). -
Ovipositor of the Braconid Wasp
JHR 83: 73–99 (2021) doi: 10.3897/jhr.83.64018 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://jhr.pensoft.net Ovipositor of the braconid wasp Habrobracon hebetor: structural and functional aspects Michael Csader1, Karin Mayer1, Oliver Betz1, Stefan Fischer1,2, Benjamin Eggs1 1 Evolutionary Biology of Invertebrates, Institute of Evolution and Ecology, University of Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076, Tübingen, Germany 2 Tübingen Structural Microscopy Core Facility (TSM), Center for Applied Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstrasse 94–96, 72076, Tübingen, Germany Corresponding author: Michael Csader ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Fernandez-Triana | Received 5 February 2021 | Accepted 22 April 2021 | Published 28 June 2021 http://zoobank.org/FEA676AD-6473-4EA3-8F74-E7F83A572234 Citation: Csader M, Mayer K, Betz O, Fischer S, Eggs B (2021) Ovipositor of the braconid wasp Habrobracon hebetor: structural and functional aspects. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 83: 73–99. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.83.64018 Abstract The Braconidae are a megadiverse and ecologically highly important group of insects. The vast majority of braconid wasps are parasitoids of other insects, usually attacking the egg or larval stages of their hosts. The ovipositor plays a crucial role in the assessment of the potential host and precise egg laying. We used light- and electron-microscopic techniques to investigate all inherent cuticular elements of the ovipositor (the female 9th abdominal tergum, two pairs of valvifers, and three pairs of valvulae) of the braconid Habrobra- con hebetor (Say, 1836) in detail with respect to their morphological structure and microsculpture. Based on serial sections, we reconstructed the terebra in 3D with all its inherent structures and the ligaments connecting it to the 2nd valvifers. -
Species from Sympatric Apis Florea (Fabricius, 1787)
Original article Evidence of reproductive isolation confirms that Apis andreniformis (Smith, 1858) is a separate species from sympatric Apis florea (Fabricius, 1787) S Wongsiri K Limbipichai P Tangkanasing M Mardan T Rinderer HA Sylvester G Koeniger G Otis 1 Bee Biology Research Unit, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; 2 Department of Plant Protection, Universiti Pertanian Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia; 3 Honey-Bee Breeding, Genetics & Physiology Research 1157 Ben Hur Road, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70820, USA; 4 Institut für Bienenkunde D 6370 Oberursel 1, FRG (Received 7 September 1989; accepted 29 September 1989) Summary — The species Apis andreniformis (Smith, 1858), the small dwarf honey bee of South- east Asia, is recognized as a valid biological species. This recognition is based on distinctive endo- phallus characteristics in comparison with sympatric Apis florea (Fabricius, 1787). Additionally, scan- ning electron microscope images of drone basitarsi are presented, as are preliminary comparisons of wing venation. Apis florea / Apis andreniformis / taxonomy / reproductive isolation INTRODUCTION characteristics of Apis florea (Fabricius, 1787) that are reported for worker bees (Maa, 1953). In 1984, our group collected dwarf honey bees in Thailand in the province of Chan- Wu and Kuang (1986, 1987) reported taburi near the border with Kampuchea. that secondary sex characteristics differed Laboratory examinations of worker bees between drones of A florea and A andre- from these collections revealed that some formis. Specifically, both have a furcated bees had the species specific characteris- basitarsus, presumably modified to grasp tics of Apis andreniformis (Smith, 1858) queens during mating (see Ruttner, 1988). and that others had the species specific The furcated basitarsus is quite different in * Correspondence and reprints. -
Biological Differences Reflect Host Preference in Two Parasitoids Attacking the Bark Beetle Ips Typographus (Coleoptera : Scolytidae) in Belgium
UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Biological differences reflect host preference in two parasitoids attacking the bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera : Scolytidae) in Belgium Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/64h0k3qr Journal Bulletin of Entomological Research, 94(4) ISSN 0007-4853 Authors Hougardy, Evelyne Gregoire, J C Publication Date 2004-08-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Bulletin of Entomological Research (2004) 94, 341–347 DOI: 10.1079/BER2004305 Biological differences reflect host preference in two parasitoids attacking the bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Belgium E. Hougardy* and J.-C. Grégoire Lutte biologique et Ecologie spatiale CP 160/12, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 50 av. F.D. Roosevelt, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium Abstract The basic reproductive biology of two ectoparasitoids developing on the late larval instars of the scolytid Ips typographus Linnaeus, a pest of spruce forests in Eurasia, was studied with the purpose of explaining which biological features allow the two species to share the same host. The anautogenous braconid Coeloides bostrichorum Giraud had a longer pre-oviposition period (5.1 vs. 3.3 days), a greater egg load (8.1 vs. 6.1 eggs), survived longer and emerged later than the pteromalid Rhopalicus tutela (Walker). In contrast, R. tutela was autogenous and tended to be more fecund under constrained conditions (9.7 vs. 5.1 total offspring per female). The longer pre-oviposition period of the specialist C. bostrichorum, coupled with its greater longevity, afforded the opportunity of better synchronization of ovipositing females with late instar larvae of I. -
132Nd Annual Academy Meeting Abstracts March 25, 2017
132nd Annual Academy Meeting Abstracts March 25, 2017 Page # Anthropology 2 Botany 5 Cell Biology 6 Chemistry 20 Earth Science 49 Ecology 28 Engineering 45 Entomology 40 Environmental Science 47 Micro and Molecular Biology 58 Physics and Astronomy 68 Plant Systematics and Biodiversity 71 Psychology 74 Science Education 75 Zoology 77 1 Anthropology Section An Examination of Midwestern American Indian Female Crania in FORDISC 3.0 with Regard to an Isolated Calotte Found in Indiana Susan Spencer Helfrich, University of Southern Indiana, and Della Collins Cook, Indiana University Isolated crania are a common find in the Midwest and are often broken and incomplete. These fragmentary finds are particularly difficult to identify using traditional forensic techniques. We present on a calotte from Greene County, Indiana, submitted to us as a forensic case. It was missing the face and skull base, allowing for only seven measurements to be entered into FORDISC®3.0 (GOL, XCB, WFB, UFBR, ASB, FRC, PAC). Discrepancies in FORDISC®3.0 results for the Greene County calotte prompted an examination of results for ancient American Indian female crania from the Schild site (AD 700-1250) in west-central Illinois. We learned that (1) ancient Midwestern American Indian females tend to be misclassified in FORDISC®3.0; (2) the likelihood of having a result with a posterior probability above 0.800 increased as the number of measurements entered into FORDISC®3.0 increased; (3) an increased number of measurements entered into FORDISC®3.0 do not guarantee a more accurate result. We propose that the application of FORDISC®3.0 in cases such as the Greene County calotte is unreliable, and should not be used to exclude an ancient American Indian identification. -
How Can Honey Bees Explain the Process of Animal Domestication by Humans?
Arthropods, 2020, 9(2): 32-37 Article How can honey bees explain the process of animal domestication by humans? Hossam F. Abou-Shaara Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Damanhour University, Damanhour 22516, Egypt E-mail: [email protected] Received 1 February 2020; Accepted 5 March 2020 ; Published 1 June 2020 Abstract Animal domestication depends on complex relationships between humans and animals. There are many questions related to the domestication still incompletely solved especially since animal domestication occurred at specific regions in the past, and the percentage of domesticated animals is low. It is not easy to change characteristics and behaviors of wild animals, and humans can only train them to do specific tasks in most cases. Some species of honey bees, genus Apis, are wild and others are domesticated. In this article, domestication steps of honey bees by humans was used as a model to explain the early domestication process for other animals and to present answers to unsolved questions. Keywords beekeeping; selection; characteristics; history. Arthropods ISSN 22244255 URL: http://www.iaees.org/publications/journals/arthropods/onlineversion.asp RSS: http://www.iaees.org/publications/journals/arthropods/rss.xml Email: [email protected] EditorinChief: WenJun Zhang Publisher: International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 1 Introduction Some animals can simply be kept by humans and some of them can serve humans, for example donkeys. Donkeys for a long period of time were the main transportation means and they can be easily kept by humans in closed and open environments. Horses are another example, and the hybridization between horses and donkeys gives domesticated hybrids which can also be kept by humans. -
Genes Involved in Convergent Evolution of Eusociality in Bees
Genes involved in convergent evolution of eusociality in bees S. Hollis Woodarda,1, Brielle J. Fischmana,1, Aarti Venkatb, Matt E. Hudsonb, Kranthi Varalab, Sydney A. Cameronc, Andrew G. Clarkd, and Gene E. Robinsona,c,e,f,2 aProgram in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, Departments of bCrop Sciences and cEntomology, eInstitute for Genomic Biology, and fNeuroscience Program, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801; and dDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 Contributed by Gene E. Robinson, March 12, 2011 (sent for review February 17, 2011) Eusociality has arisen independently at least 11 times in insects. different social lifestyles among relatively closely related species. Despite this convergence, there are striking differences among Furthermore, the extensive knowledge of bee natural history (8, eusocial lifestyles, ranging from species living in small colonies 13, 14) provides a valuable framework for developing hypotheses with overt conflict over reproduction to species in which colonies about the adaptive significance of genetic changes detected in contain hundreds of thousands of highly specialized sterile work- eusocial bee lineages. ers produced by one or a few queens. Although the evolution of To study patterns of molecular evolution associated with eusociality has been intensively studied, the genetic changes eusociality in bees, we generated ~1 Gbp of expressed sequence involved in the evolution of eusociality are relatively unknown. tags (ESTs) from a set of nine bee species (Table S1). This set of We examined patterns of molecular evolution across three in- species reflects the remarkable social diversity in bees by in- dependent origins of eusociality by sequencing transcriptomes of cluding eusocial and non-eusocial species; three origins of euso- nine socially diverse bee species and combining these data with ciality (9, 10); and two different forms of eusocial lifestyle, “highly genome sequence from the honey bee Apis mellifera to generate eusocial” and “primitively eusocial” (ref. -
Evolution of the Insects
CY501-C11[407-467].qxd 3/2/05 12:56 PM Page 407 quark11 Quark11:Desktop Folder:CY501-Grimaldi:Quark_files: But, for the point of wisdom, I would choose to Know the mind that stirs Between the wings of Bees and building wasps. –George Eliot, The Spanish Gypsy 11HHymenoptera:ymenoptera: Ants, Bees, and Ants,Other Wasps Bees, and The order Hymenoptera comprises one of the four “hyperdi- various times between the Late Permian and Early Triassic. verse” insectO lineages;ther the others – Diptera, Lepidoptera, Wasps and, Thus, unlike some of the basal holometabolan orders, the of course, Coleoptera – are also holometabolous. Among Hymenoptera have a relatively recent origin, first appearing holometabolans, Hymenoptera is perhaps the most difficult in the Late Triassic. Since the Triassic, the Hymenoptera have to place in a phylogenetic framework, excepting the enig- truly come into their own, having radiated extensively in the matic twisted-wings, order Strepsiptera. Hymenoptera are Jurassic, again in the Cretaceous, and again (within certain morphologically isolated among orders of Holometabola, family-level lineages) during the Tertiary. The hymenopteran consisting of a complex mixture of primitive traits and bauplan, in both structure and function, has been tremen- numerous autapomorphies, leaving little evidence to which dously successful. group they are most closely related. Present evidence indi- While the beetles today boast the largest number of cates that the Holometabola can be organized into two major species among all orders, Hymenoptera may eventually rival lineages: the Coleoptera ϩ Neuropterida and the Panorpida. or even surpass the diversity of coleopterans (Kristensen, It is to the Panorpida that the Hymenoptera appear to be 1999a; Grissell, 1999). -
The Basics of Beekeeping
The Basics of Beekeeping by M. M. Peterson on behalf of the Dunblane and Stirling Districts Beekeepers' Association 2017 edition Contents 1 Introduction 6 1.1 The beekeeper . 6 1.2 Development of methods of beekeeping . 8 1.3 Significant bee forage plants in our Association area . 10 2 Beekeeping Equipment 11 2.1 Beehives and their accessories . 11 2.1.1 Introduction . 11 2.1.2 The National hive and its accessories . 12 2.2 Protective clothing . 15 2.3 Tools for working with bees . 15 2.4 Harvesting tools . 16 2.5 Miscellaneous and specialist items . 17 2.6 Appendix | other hive designs . 17 2.6.1 Introduction . 17 2.6.2 The (Unmodified) National hive and the Wormit Commercial hive . 17 2.6.3 The Smith hive . 17 2.6.4 The WBC hive . 18 2.6.5 Some more unusual hive designs . 18 3 The basic biology of Apis mellifera, the western honeybee 19 3.1 Introduction . 19 3.2 The place of the honey bee in nature . 19 3.3 Where bees live . 21 3.4 The end of summer . 21 3.5 Stings . 21 3.6 The casting of the drones . 22 3.7 Wintering . 22 3.8 The spring build-up: brood-rearing . 22 3.9 Foraging, colony growth and bee longevity . 23 3.10 Reproduction: Dzierzon's rule, and drones . 23 3.11 Swarming and the rearing of new queens . 24 3.12 Queen production in other circumstances . 25 3.13 Autumn returns . 25 4 Handling: Spring and Summer Management 28 4.1 Beekeeping | basic handling skills . -
Instrumental Insemination
Rising Tide Seminar Enhancing Genetic Diversity in the U.S. Honey Bee Gene Pool Susan Cobey Endemic Range Apis mellifera Diversity carnica macedonica Honey bees are (1 (2 (2 6 1 4 Endemic to Europe, da d da ys ay ys Africa & Central Asia ) s) ) 28 recognized subspecies The first honey bees imported to the US were the “dark” bee of Northern Europe, Apis mellifera mellifera Colonies were established in Virginia by 1622. Dispersed and established widely in the countryside ahead of human colonial expansion. Historical Importations of Italian bees 1859 – First importation of A. m. ligustica. Sourced from Johann Dzierzon’s apiary in Germany. 1860 –A. m. ligustica imported directly from Italy to the U.S. Samual Parsons with beekeeping assistance from L. L. Langstroth. A subset of these subspecies were brought to North America And were established to form the basis for current honey bee populations in the United States 1922 Honey Bee Act Restricted further importations in attempt to keep out tracheal mites California Queen & Package Bee Industry Supplier of Queens & Bees to Re-Stock the Industry Nationwide Garvey Also Responsible for … Selection & Maintenance of Genetic Material Increasing Challenges… Loss of Diverse Forage Intensive Agricultural Practices Exposure to Chemical Residues Pests, Parasites & Pathogens Reduced Genetic Diversity Garvey Increasing Challenges… Malnutrition- Lack of Adequate and Diverse Forage Monoculture Crops Habitat Degradation Climate Change Sub-lethal Effects Of Chemical Exposure Queen Effects: Mating, Signaling Egg