Creating a Culture of Fear

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Creating a Culture of Fear HUMAN RIGHTS CREATING A CULTURE OF FEAR The Criminalization of Peaceful Expression in Malaysia WATCH Creating a Culture of Fear The Criminalization of Peaceful Expression in Malaysia Copyright © 2015 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-6231-32859 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org OCTOBER 2015 978-1-6231-32859 Creating a Culture of Fear The Criminalization of Peaceful Expression in Malaysia Map of Malaysia ............................................................................................................... i Glossary of Common Terms and Acronyms ....................................................................... ii Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Overly Restrictive Laws as a Tool for Repression ........................................................................ 3 Targeting the Political Opposition ............................................................................................. 5 Targeting Civil Society .............................................................................................................. 6 Targeting the Media .................................................................................................................. 7 Targeting Social Media Users ................................................................................................... 8 Restrictions on Freedom of Assembly ....................................................................................... 9 Abusive Police Tactics and Selective Prosecution .................................................................... 10 Key Recommendations ................................................................................................... 12 To the Prime Minister and the Government of Malaysia ........................................................... 12 Methodology ................................................................................................................. 14 I. Background ................................................................................................................ 15 II. International and Domestic Legal Standards .............................................................. 20 The Malaysian Constitution..................................................................................................... 23 III. The Criminalization of Peaceful Expression ............................................................... 24 Sedition Act of 1948 and Amendments .................................................................................... 24 Sections 504 and 505(b) of the Penal Code: Offenses Against Public Tranquility ...................... 54 Section 505(c) of the Penal Code: Hate Speech ....................................................................... 58 Penal Code Sections 499-502: Criminal Defamation ............................................................... 60 Printing Presses and Publications Act of 1984 (Amended 1988 and 2012) ................................ 65 Communications and Multimedia Act of 1998 (Amended 2006) ............................................... 74 Penal Code Section 124B-124N: Activity Detrimental to Parliamentary Democracy ................... 80 The Film Censorship Act ......................................................................................................... 84 The Peaceful Assembly Act of 2012 ......................................................................................... 87 Others Laws Used to Limit Freedom of Assembly ..................................................................... 93 IV. Abusive Police Tactics and Selective Prosecution ......................................................98 V. Profiles of Critics Targeted by the Government ......................................................... 105 Forbidding Cartoons: The Targeting of Zunar ......................................................................... 105 Wearing Down the Opposition: The Targeting of Rafizi Ramli ................................................... 111 VI. Other Laws that Restrict Freedom of Expression ....................................................... 115 The Official Secrets Act of 1972 (amended 1986) .................................................................... 115 Penal Code Section 203a: Disclosure of Information ............................................................. 118 Evidence (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 2012 ............................................................................... 119 Penal Code Section 503: Criminal Intimidation ...................................................................... 121 Penal Code Sections 298 and 509: Offensive Speech ............................................................ 122 Penal Code Sections 124G and 124I ...................................................................................... 123 VII. Recommendations ................................................................................................. 126 To the Government of Malaysia ............................................................................................. 126 To the Prime Minister and the Cabinet of the Government of Malaysia ................................... 126 To The Minister of Home Affairs ............................................................................................. 130 To the Attorney-General’s Chambers ..................................................................................... 132 To the Inspector General of Police ......................................................................................... 132 To the Malaysian Multimedia and Communications Commission ........................................... 133 To the Minister of Foreign Affairs ........................................................................................... 134 To SUHAKAM (Human Rights Commission of Malaysia) .......................................................... 134 To the UN Country Team and UN Resident Coordinator .......................................................... 135 To the United States, Japan, European Union Member States, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, India, and the Republic of Korea ........................................................................................... 136 Appendix I: Letter to the Malaysian Government .......................................................... 137 Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................... 143 Map of Malaysia I HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | OCTOBER 2015 Glossary of Common Terms and Acronyms 1MDB 1 Malaysia Development Berhad Bersih Coalition for Free and Fair Elections BN Barisan Nasional, or National Front CMA Communications and Multimedia Act DAP Democratic Action Party EO Emergency (Public Order and Prevention of Crime) Ordinance GST Goods and Services Tax ICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights IGP Inspector General of Police ISA International Security Act JAKIM Malaysian Islamic Development Department MCMC Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission MP Member of Parliament OHCHR Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights OSA Official Secrets Act PAS Parti Islam Se Malaysia, or the Pan Malaysian Islamic Party PAA Peaceful Assembly Act PKR Parti Keadilan Rakyat, or the People’s Justice Party PPPA Printing Presses and Publications Act PTA Prevention of Terrorism Act PSM Party Sosialis Malaysia, or the Socialist Party of Malaysia PSRM Party Sosialis Rakyat Malaysia RM Malaysian Ringgit RPDM Polis Diraja Malaysia, or the Royal Malaysia Police Suaram Suara Rakyat Malaysia SUHAKAM Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia, or the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia TMI The Malaysian Insider UDHR Universal Declaration of Human Rights UMNO United Malays National Organization “CREATING A CULTURE OF FEAR” II Summary They are creating a culture of fear. If you engage in any talk of public interest, the police may come to your house, you may be arrested, taken to the police station, remanded. Even members of Parliament are treated that way. —Yap Swee Seng, former executive director of Suara Rakyat Malaysia (Suaram), Kuala Lumpur, April 14, 2015 Freedom of expression and assembly in Malaysia are currently under attack, aided by the existence of broad and vaguely worded laws that the government can wield to arrest, investigate, and imprison its critics. The recent increase in use of laws that criminalize peaceful expression is a step backward for a country that had seemed to be making progress on the protection of rights. This report examines how the Malaysian government is using and abusing such laws, and the ways in
Recommended publications
  • Pollutant-Absorbing Plants to Clean up Sungai
    Headline Pollutant-absorbing plants to clean up Sungai Rui MediaTitle The Star Date 12 Apr 2019 Color Full Color Section Metro Circulation 175,986 Page No 4 Readership 527,958 Language English ArticleSize 433 cm² Journalist IVAN LOH AdValue RM 21,791 Frequency Daily PR Value RM 65,373 >n i. Pollutant-absorbing plants to clean up Sungai Rui By IVAN LOH [email protected] PLANTS may hold the key to helping clean up low levels of arsenic pollution in Sungai iSSBl, .a»™.™ Rui, Hulu Perak. f-gp I ffgsggg A discussion is now ongoing between the is3s*i»3ill Perak Forestry Department and Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM) to search for plants that can absorb pollution. Perak Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Ahmad Faizal Azumu said the task force that was set up to look into the polluted river issue had recommended the move in its bid to clean up the river. He said it was one of its suggestions to rehabilitate idle mining areas near the river. "We will execute it once the species of plant have been identified. Recent checks showed low levels of arsenic in Sungai Rui. Villagers along the river have complained about skin problems which they believe "For now, the state Department of are linked to the river contamination. (Right) Ahmad Faizal says the state Department of Environment will continue to monitor the situation Environment will continue to monitor the at Sungai Rui. situation there," he said during a press con- ference at the state secretariat building. samples from 300 people near Kampung "The task force will be informed of any further drop in river water quality," he "The presence of arsenic in tfie river may added.
    [Show full text]
  • Defamation, That Is, Comments Or Statements That Tarnish Or Destroy a Person’S Reputation in the Minds of Others
    You Can’t Say That!! continued Hilary Findlay, a lawyer, and Rachel Corbett, a risk management consultant, are founders and directors of the Centre for Sport and Law. They are regular contributors to Coaches Report. In the last issue of Coaches Report, we wrote about defamation, that is, comments or statements that tarnish or destroy a person’s reputation in the minds of others. We identified the three elements that make a communication defamatory: A written or spoken communication must be made to a third person. The communication must convey a defamatory meaning or be capable of being interpreted in a defamatory manner. The defamatory meaning must be about the person bringing the allegation. We cited the case of Pliuskaitis v. Jotautas,1 in which a board member of a swim club was found by the court to have made a number of defamatory comments about the club’s coach. We explained that there is a very low threshold for a finding of defamation. In other words, it is not difficult to prove the three elements of defamation described above. Once defamation is established, the question becomes, Are the circumstances such that a defamatory communication may be legally justified or allowable? These are called “defences” to a claim of defamation and they are the focus of this article. We will also pick up the case of Pliuskaitis v. Jotautas and look at the defences put forward by the board member and see whether or not they were successful. There are four defences to a finding of defamation: consent, fair comment, justification, and qualified privilege.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia 120613
    PRESS RELEASE MALAYSIA: Immediately release and drop charges against activists and political opponents in the framework of the crackdown of post-election rallies! Geneva, 12 June 2013. The World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) expresses its concern about the crackdown that has followed Malaysia’s 13th General Elections, which led to the arrest of and charges against several civil society activists and political opponents. The continuing wave of repression of peaceful dissenters as well as the numerous acts of police brutality all point to a continuing, serious deterioration in the Malaysian government’s respect for human rights, basic freedoms and the rule of law. On 5 May 2013, Malaysia’s 13th General Elections concluded, marred with electoral fraud and irregularities. Subsequently, several peaceful “Blackout 505” rallies were organised to protest the results in many parts of Malaysia. On 18 May 2013, a crackdown started against civil society activists and political opponents who organised or took part in such rallies. Most recently, on 28 May 2013 in the evening, Mr. Haris Ibrahim, a social activist member of the movement “Anything but UMNO”, Mr. Mohammad Safwan Anang, a student activist, Mr. Tamrin bin Abdul Ghafar and Mr. Chua Tian Chang, both opposition members of the Parliament of Malaysia, were arrested and taken to the Dang Wangi Police Station in Kuala Lumpur. On 29 May 2013, they were charged under Section 4 (1) (b) of the Sedition Act 1948 at the Kuala Lumpur High Court in relation to speeches they made during the public gathering on 13 May 2013, one of the rallies organised in the framework of the “Blackout 505” peaceful protests.
    [Show full text]
  • DAP Moves to Ease Fears Over Islamic State Malaysiakini.Com January 21, 2011
    DAP moves to ease fears over Islamic state Malaysiakini.com January 21, 2011 Following attempts by Umno and MCA to intimidate Chinese voters in Tenang with PAS' Islamic state agenda, DAP is moving to allay such fears, stressing that PAS is now a party that fights for all ethnic groups. "MCA is sleeping, thinking that it is still 1999 when people were afraid of an Islamic state. In fact, PAS is now talking about a welfare state and its battles for the benefit of all races," Johor DAP chief Dr Boo Cheng Hau said at a DAP dinner in Labis last night. "Umno is the one still talking racial politics. We don't call our home minister Hishammuddin (Hussein), we call him Kerismuddin because he always brandishes the keris." Besides Boo, other DAP leaders expressed their support for PAS at the RM50 a head fund-raising dinner attended by some 800 passionate Chinese supporters, where DAP also raised another RM4,555 in on-the-spot donations. DAP Rasah MP Anthony Loke rebutted MCA president Dr Chua Soi Lek's statement earlier that Chinese who voted for PAS would be sending the Malay community the message that they were willing to accept the country as an Islamic state. "We will vote for PAS on Jan 30 for a fair and corruption-free government, not for an Islamic state. We vote to change the government, not merely for PAS, nor an Islamic state," Loke (right) said. The party youth chief then turned aggressive: "If we vote for Umno, it means that we accept Umno's continued oppression of us and allow the party to continue its extreme racial statements and behaviour." Islamic state is not Pakatan common policy His statement was echoed by DAP parliamentary leader Lim Kit Siang, who pointed out that Penang, Selangor and Perak, which are ruled by Pakatan Rakyat, have not turned into Islamic states.
    [Show full text]
  • Kuala Lumpur, Melaka & Penang
    Plan Your Trip 12 ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd Kuala Lumpur, Melaka & Penang “All you’ve got to do is decide to go and the hardest part is over. So go!” TONY WHEELER, COFOUNDER – LONELY PLANET THIS EDITION WRITTEN AND RESEARCHED BY Simon Richmond, Isabel Albiston Contents PlanPlan Your Your Trip Trip page 1 4 Welcome to Top Itineraries ...............16 Eating ............................25 Kuala Lumpur ................. 4 If You Like... ....................18 Drinking & Nightlife.... 31 Kuala Lumpur’s Top 10 ...6 Month By Month ........... 20 Entertainment ............ 34 What’s New ....................13 With Kids ....................... 22 Shopping ...................... 36 Need to Know ................14 Like a Local ................... 24 Explore Kuala Lumpur 40 Neighbourhoods Masjid India, Day Trips from at a Glance ................... 42 Kampung Baru & Kuala Lumpur ............. 112 Northern KL .................. 83 Bukit Bintang Sleeping ......................124 & KLCC .......................... 44 Lake Gardens, Brickfields & Bangsar .. 92 Melaka City.................133 Chinatown, Merdeka Square & Bukit Nanas ...67 Penang .........................155 Understand Kuala Lumpur 185 Kuala Lumpur Life in Kuala Lumpur ...197 Arts & Architecture .... 207 Today ........................... 186 Multiculturalism, Environment ................212 History ......................... 188 Religion & Culture ......200 Survival Guide 217 Transport .....................218 Directory A–Z ............. 222 Language ....................229 Kuala
    [Show full text]
  • Rehabilitating a Federal Supervisor's Reputation Through a Claim
    Title VII and EEOC case law have created an almost blanket protection for defamatory statements made in the form of allegations of harassment or discrimination in the federal workplace. In this environment, federal supervisors would do well to exercise caution before resorting to the intui- tive remedy of a defamation claim. Although there are some situations where an employee may engage in action so egregious that a claim of defamation is a good option, one cannot escape the fact that supervisory employment in the federal workplace comes with an increased risk of defamatory accusations for which there is no legal remedy. BY DANIEL WATSON 66 • THE FEDERAL LAWYER • OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 2014 Rehabilitating a Federal Supervisor’s Reputation Through a Claim of Defamation ohn Doe is a supervisor for a federal and demeaning insults he was alleged to have yelled at Jane agency. As he was leaving the office one Doe, and sex discrimination for his refusal to publish her work. Outraged at the false accusation, John immediately called Jnight, a female subordinate, Jane Doe, Jane into his office and asked her how she could have lied. Did stopped and asked why her work product she not know it was illegal to lie about that type of behavior? Jane responded by accusing John of retaliation. A week after had not received approval for publication. the incident, while speaking to a coworker, John Doe discov- He attempted to explain that he had already ered that the coworker had overheard the entire conversation documented his critique via e-mail and that between John and Jane and would swear to the fact that Jane was lying about what was said.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taib Timber Mafia
    The Taib Timber Mafia Facts and Figures on Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) from Sarawak, Malaysia 20 September 2012 Bruno Manser Fund - The Taib Timber Mafia Contents Sarawak, an environmental crime hotspot ................................................................................. 4 1. The “Stop Timber Corruption” Campaign ............................................................................... 5 2. The aim of this report .............................................................................................................. 5 3. Sources used for this report .................................................................................................... 6 4. Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. 6 5. What is a “PEP”? ....................................................................................................................... 7 6. Specific due diligence requirements for financial service providers when dealing with PEPs ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 7. The Taib Family ....................................................................................................................... 9 8. Taib’s modus operandi ............................................................................................................ 9 9. Portraits of individual Taib family members ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Khamis, 10 Disember 2020 Mesyuarat Dimulakan Pada Pukul 10.00 Pagi DOA [Tuan Yang Di-Pertua Mempengerusikan Mesyuarat]
    Naskhah belum disemak PENYATA RASMI PARLIMEN DEWAN RAKYAT PARLIMEN KEEMPAT BELAS PENGGAL KETIGA MESYUARAT KETIGA Bil. 51 Khamis 10 Disember 2020 K A N D U N G A N JAWAPAN-JAWAPAN MENTERI BAGI PERTANYAAN-PERTANYAAN (Halaman 1) JAWAPAN-JAWAPAN LISAN BAGI PERTANYAAN-PERTANYAAN (Halaman 7) RANG UNDANG-UNDANG DIBAWA KE DALAM MESYUARAT (Halaman 21) RANG UNDANG-UNDANG: Rang Undang-undang Perbekalan 2021 Jawatankuasa:- Jadual:- Kepala B.45 (Halaman 23) Kepala B.46 (Halaman 52) Kepala B.47 (Halaman 101) USUL-USUL: Usul Anggaran Pembangunan 2021 Jawatankuasa:- Kepala P.45 (Halaman 23) Kepala P.46 (Halaman 52) Kepala P.47 (Halaman 101) Meminda Jadual Di Bawah P.M. 57(2) – Mengurangkan RM45 juta Daripada Peruntukan Kepala B.47 (Halaman 82) Waktu Mesyuarat dan Urusan Dibebaskan Daripada Peraturan Mesyuarat (Halaman 83) Meminda Jadual Di Bawah P.M. 66(9) – Mengurangkan RM85,549,200 Daripada Peruntukan Kepala B.47 (Halaman 102) DR. 10.12.2020 1 MALAYSIA DEWAN RAKYAT PARLIMEN KEEMPAT BELAS PENGGAL KETIGA MESYUARAT KETIGA Khamis, 10 Disember 2020 Mesyuarat dimulakan pada pukul 10.00 pagi DOA [Tuan Yang di-Pertua mempengerusikan Mesyuarat] JAWAPAN-JAWAPAN MENTERI BAGI PERTANYAAN-PERTANYAAN Tuan Karupaiya a/l Mutusami [Padang Serai]: Tuan Yang di-Pertua, saya minta dua minit, saya ada masalah di kawasan saya. Dua minit. Terima kasih Tuan Yang di-Pertua. Padang Serai ingin sampaikan masalah-masalah rakyat di kawasan, terutama sekali PKPD telah dilanjutkan di Taman Bayam, Taman Kangkung 1 dan 2, Taman Cekur Manis, Taman Sedeli Limau, Taman Bayam Indah, Taman Halia dan Taman Kubis di kawasan Paya Besar. Parlimen Padang Serai hingga 24 Disember 2020 iaitu selama empat minggu.
    [Show full text]
  • DAP Exco Man Freed After Night in Lock-Up Malaysiakini.Com Sept 1, 2014
    DAP exco man freed after night in lock-up MalaysiaKini.com Sept 1, 2014 Penang exco member Phee Boon Poh was released by police this evening after having spent a night in a police lock-up for his role as the head of state-funded Voluntary Patrol Unit (PPS). A total of 134 more PPS members will be released by midnight, lawyer Gobind Singh Deo said this afternoon. Gobind said the documentation was being done to secure the release of the members. He was accompanied by 21 lawyers from DAP, PKR and the Bar Council’s Legal Aid Centre and they managed to get into a sessions court set up for the matter at the Northeast District police headquarters on Jalan Patani about 12.30pm today. "The police applied to remand them for four days, but since they needed to prepare the documentation, the detainees will be released, temporarily, on police bail today. "The sessions court judge heard the application by the detainees to seek their release," Gobind said. However, the lawyers were not informed about the actual reason for the remand. Sessions judge Mohamad Izwan presided over the matter, while police officer ASP Karuna applied for the remand. The lawyers came out about 3pm and were greeted by supporters who clapped happily upon hearing about the pending release of the detainees. Exact charge yet to be specified According to Gobind, the detainees are being investigated under Section 43 of the 1966 Societies Act, but the exact charge is yet to be specified. Earlier, 21 PPS members - seven women and 14 senior citizens over the age 60 - were released on police bail, after Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng negotiated with the police for their release last night.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysian Parliament 1965
    Official Background Guide Malaysian Parliament 1965 Model United Nations at Chapel Hill XVIII February 22 – 25, 2018 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Table of Contents Letter from the Crisis Director ………………………………………………………………… 3 Letter from the Chair ………………………………………………………………………… 4 Background Information ………………………………………………………………………… 5 Background: Singapore ……………………………………………………… 5 Background: Malaysia ……………………………………………………… 9 Identity Politics ………………………………………………………………………………… 12 Radical Political Parties ………………………………………………………………………… 14 Race Riots ……………………………………………………………………………………… 16 Positions List …………………………………………………………………………………… 18 Endnotes ……………………………………………………………………………………… 22 Parliament of Malaysia 1965 Page 2 Letter from the Crisis Director Dear Delegates, Welcome to the Malaysian Parliament of 1965 Committee at the Model United Nations at Chapel Hill 2018 Conference! My name is Annah Bachman and I have the honor of serving as your Crisis Director. I am a third year Political Science and Philosophy double major here at UNC-Chapel Hill and have been involved with MUNCH since my freshman year. I’ve previously served as a staffer for the Democratic National Committee and as the Crisis Director for the Security Council for past MUNCH conferences. This past fall semester I studied at the National University of Singapore where my idea of the Malaysian Parliament in 1965 was formed. Through my experience of living in Singapore for a semester and studying its foreign policy, it has been fascinating to see how the “traumatic” separation of Singapore has influenced its current policies and relations with its surrounding countries. Our committee is going back in time to just before Singapore’s separation from the Malaysian peninsula to see how ethnic and racial tensions, trade policies, and good old fashioned diplomacy will unfold. Delegates should keep in mind that there is a difference between Southeast Asian diplomacy and traditional Western diplomacy (hint: think “ASEAN way”).
    [Show full text]
  • 23 November 2016
    Bil. 52 Rabu 23 November 2016 MALAYSIA PENYATA RASMI PARLIMEN DEWAN RAKYAT PARLIMEN KETIGA BELAS ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Diterbitkan oleh: PENGGAL KEEMPAT CAWANGAN PENYATA RASMI PARLIMEN MALAYSIA MESYUARAT KETIGA 2016 K A N D U N G A N JAWAPAN-JAWAPAN LISAN BAGI PERTANYAAN-PERTANYAAN (Halaman 1) RANG UNDANG-UNDANG DIBAWA KE DALAM MESYUARAT (Halaman 20) USUL MENTERI DI JABATAN PERDANA MENTERI DI BAWAH P.M.27(3): Menggantung Yang Berhormat Segambut Daripada Perkhidmatan Majlis Mesyuarat Selama Enam Bulan (Halaman 21) RANG UNDANG-UNDANG: Rang Undang-undang Kewangan 2016 (Halaman 25) Rang Undang-undang Kesalahan Yang Berhubungan Dengan Anugerah 2016 (Halaman 58) Rang Undang-undang Lambang dan Nama (Mencegah Penggunaan Tak Wajar)(Pindaan) 2016 (Halaman 82) Rang Undang-undang Pentadbiran Undang-undang Islam (Wilayah-wilayah Persekutuan)(Pindaan) 2016 (Halaman 83) Rang Undang-undang Pendaftaran Kelahiran dan Kematian (Pindaan) 20 (Halaman 100) Rang Undang-undang Pihak Berkuasa Penerbangan Awam Malaysia 2016 (Halaman 119) Rang Undang-undang Penerbangan Awam (Pindaan) 2016 (Halaman 138) USUL-USUL: Waktu Mesyuarat dan Urusan Dibebaskan Daripada Peraturan Mesyuarat (Halaman 20) Meminda Susunan Aturan Urusan Mesyuarat (Halaman 45) Menangguhkan Bacaan Kali Yang Kedua dan Ketiga Rang Undang-undang (Halaman 142) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Diterbitkan oleh: CAWANGAN PENYATA RASMI PARLIMEN MALAYSIA 2016 DR 23.11.2016 i AHLI-AHLI DEWAN RAKYAT 1. Yang Berhormat Tuan Yang di-Pertua, Tan Sri Datuk Seri Panglima Pandikar Amin Haji Mulia, P.S.M., S.P.D.K., S.U.M.W., P.G.D.K., J.S.M., J.P. 2. “ Timbalan Yang di-Pertua, Datuk Seri Dr. Ronald Kiandee, P.G.D.K., A.S.D.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Aturan Urusan Mesyuarat
    MALAYSIA DEWAN RAKYAT ATURAN URUSAN MESYUARAT NASKHAH SAHIH/BAHASA MALAYSIA http://www.parlimen.gov.my HARI KHAMIS, 27 OGOS 2020, PUKUL 10.00 PAGI Bil. 12 WAKTU PERTANYAAN-PERTANYAAN MENTERI 1. PR-1432-MQT1021 Dato' Haji Jalaluddin bin Haji Alias [ Jelebu ] minta MENTERI PERTANIAN DAN INDUSTRI MAKANAN menyatakan sejauh manakah penganjuran MAHA 2020 akan mematuhi Prosedur Operasi Standard (SOP) yang ditetapkan oleh KKM di mana kita masih berhadapan dengan penularan pandemik COVID-19 serta apakah hasil pulangan ekonomi yang dapat dijana melalui penganjuran MAHA 2020 pada tahun ini. 2. PR-1432-MQT1001 Tuan Chang Lih Kang [ Tanjong Malim ] minta MENTERI PERUMAHAN DAN KERAJAAN TEMPATAN menyatakan apakah rasional cadangan Kementerian Perumahan dan Kerajaan Tempatan untuk laksanakan cukai pengosongan atau 'vacancy tax' kepada pemaju perumahan yang tidak dapat menjual rumah yang sudah siap. 3. PR-1432-MQT1014 Tuan Wong Hon Wai [ Bukit Bendera ] minta MENTERI PENGANGKUTAN menyatakan apakah sebabnya perkhidmatan feri di Pulau Pinang terhenti dan apakah usaha jangka pendek untuk menyambung perkhidmatan feri dan pelan jangka panjang untuk naik taraf perkhidmatan feri Pulau Pinang. MALAYSIA DEWAN RAKYAT ATURAN URUSAN MESYUARAT NASKHAH SAHIH/BAHASA MALAYSIA http://www.parlimen.gov.my HARI KHAMIS, 27 OGOS 2020, PUKUL 10.00 PAGI Bil. 26 WAKTU PERTANYAAN-PERTANYAAN MENTERI PERTANYAAN-PERTANYAAN BAGI JAWAB LISAN 1. PR-1432-L08779 Datuk Zakaria bin Mohd. Edris @ Tubau [ Libaran ] minta MENTERI DALAM NEGERI menyatakan sama ada Kerajaan bercadang untuk meluas atau melanjutkan perintah berkurung ESSCOM ke laut terbuka memandangkan kes penculikan kru bot telah beralih ke laut terbuka. 2. PR-1432-L09588 Datuk Seri Haji Salahuddin bin Ayub [ Pulai ] minta MENTERI PERTANIAN DAN INDUSTRI MAKANAN menyatakan adakah Kementerian bercadang untuk memperkenalkan pelupusan harga siling beras tempatan dan penetapan harga siling beras import.
    [Show full text]