Constructing the Subject an Interview with Kurt Danziger'

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Constructing the Subject an Interview with Kurt Danziger' P & M 73, 1995,351-366 351_ JlIrl/1I1 ADRIAN BROCK Constructing the subject , 1flL'IlS is An interview with Kurt Danziger' -gie Villi ;1. In the autumn of 1994, Kurt Oanziger retired from full-time teaching Icid,49, at York University in Toronto, Canada. He was born in Germany and studied psychology in South Africa and England. He has taught psy- chology in Australia, Indonesia, South Africa, Germany and Canada. 'vland« Danziger began his career in experimental psychology )e Er- but soon moved into developmental and social psycholo- de ja- gy. His work in these areas from the 1960's and 1970's has been translated into several languages and is still cit- ed and discussed. Around the middle of the 1970' s, his interests moved to history and theory of psychology and .rochi- he quickly established a formidable reputation in this con- field. Much of his work went against traditional accounts of the history of psychology, which had been accepted 'filly,is, for many years, and led to major changes in our view of psychology's past. Oanziger's contributions to several e Kei- different areas of psychology 'were recognised in 1989 Uitge- when he was elected a Fellow of the prestigious Royal ,Iksse- Society of Canada ~ one of the very few psychologists who have received this distinction. Kuri Danziget One of the more interesting features of Danziger's historical work is that it focusses on central aspects of psychology which have tradition- ally been neglected by historians of psychology ~ perhaps because they are regarded as timeless. During the 1980's, Danziger published numerous articles and chapters on the history of psychological me- thods. Much of this work was brought together in his book, Construct- ing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research (1990a), This book was the subject of a symposium which was held at the meeting of the International Society for the History of the Social and Behav- ioural Sciences in 1991. The papers from this symposium were subse- quently published in Theory and Psychology (Capshew et at, 1992). Some indication of the importance of the book can be seen in the lead review of the July 1992 issue of Contemporary Psychology. The reviewer writes: 'Without a doubt this is the most important book on the histo- ry of psychology to come along in years. It is my sincere hope that at some future time the understanding and the very teaching of the his- tory of our discipline will have been profoundly altered by Danziger's analysis.' (Stam, 1992, p, 632) Constructing the subject helped to bring Danziger's historical work to the attention of a broader audience of non-specialists. One of his main concerns has been to show that history of psychology is not the chronicle of a dead past but an active area of research which is of rele- _352 I' & M 73, 1995 vance to contemporary issues in psychology. This was the subject of invited addresses which he gave to the American Psychological Asso- ciation, the Canadian Psychological Association and the British Psy- chological Society in 1992 and 1993. An article based on these invited addresses, Does the history of psychology have a [u ture?, has already ap- peared (Danziger, 1994). As part of this concern to see history and theory of psychology re- cognised as a legitimate speciality within psychology, Danziger play- ed a central role in establishing the History /Theory option within the Psychology graduate programme at York University, which he coor- dinated for many years. One of the few of its kind in the world, the option has attracted students from Europe and the United States - many of whom have been supervised by Danziger himself. Oanziger's pioneering work in this field was recognised by the Cana- dian Psychological Association in 1994 when he received its first Award for Distinguished Contributions to Education and Training. Although he has now retired from full-time teaching, Danziger continues to be very active in research. He is currently working on a new book on the history of basic psychological concepts like person- ality, intelligence, emotion, motivation and the self. This is yet another example of Danziger's tendency to examine the history of central as- pects of the discipline which have been traditionally regarded as eternal. It will, no doubt, solidify his reputation as an important and original researcher. Could I start by asking you to say afew words abou t your background - where you were born, educated and 50 011? I was born in Breslau in 1926 - at that time part of Cermany.s When J was 11, my family emigrated to South Africa and so I finished my education in Cape Town, South Africa up to the M.A. level. I went to Oxford to do my D.Phil in 1949. The psychology department at Oxford was quite new at the time - was it not? Very new. It had only just been established as an experimental psy- chology department. As you know, there had been individuals there within psychology - the best known, of course, having been William MacDougall - long before but, as an institute, it was new. It had just been established before I came-' With George Humphreu as the head? Yes. And George Humphrey had been at Queen's University in Cana- da for a long time before returning to Oxford.? Oxford had a reputation as a hotbed of critical philosophers. I wouldn't say anti-psychology but certainly anti-psychology in the way that it was being done. I'm thinking '.Jfpeople like Gilbert Ryle.5 Did you encounter any of this criticism? I Yes. What I mostly encountered "vas the anxiety among the psycholo- I gists not to run afoul of the philosophers. They had the feeling that, as ~"::~~.::'>:"~:":~'" ... 1.lf&~:r;,.",.... CONSTRUCTING THE SUBJECT 353_ et of soon as they ventured into the realm of theory-conceptualization, they Asso- would be vulnerable to attacks from that quarter and so they didn't 1'sy- do it. The department tended to be almost dustbowl empiricist in its vited approach - except for Ceorge Humphrey himself who, at the time, yap- was putting the finishing touches to his book on thinking, which is still a very useable historical study." I didn't appreciate that at the gy re- time because I wasn't into the history of psychology. It was only after- play- wards that Irealised the opportunity that Ihad missed. Ididn't talk in the with Ceorge Humphrey about history at all - only about rats, which coor- is what I was doing at the time? the You started out in Australia I believe. self. It was very difficult to get an academic position in Britain when I Cana- graduated in 1951. There was still a backlog of ex-servicemen around t who would, of course, get priority. Iwas the first cohort of a younger mg. generation that had been too young to participate in the war and so ~er the best opportunity that presented itself was in Melbourne, Australia. on a That was a far more lively department at the time than Oxford. It too ·son- was new. It had only just been established but its resources were far nether superior. There was a whole different outlook. It was almost at the op- 11 as- posite end of the continuum. There was a lot of theorizing and a lot of critical debate going on. and You were still in experimental psychology at the time? Iwas supposed to be setting up the animal laboratory there and Idid but Igot interested in other things - although that had already started in Oxford. While Iwas there, Niko Tinbergen - the ethologist - ar- 'hen I rived. His fame didn't take very long to spread. Especially for someone 1y like myself who was working on animal behaviour, it clearly made -nt to sense to listen to what this man had to say. His lectures were just down the road in the zoology department. After listening to Tinbergen for a while, and after reading some of the ethology literature, Icame to real- it not? ise that what Iwas doing - which was pretty standard 1940's psycho- 'sy- logical rat experimentation - didn't make a whole lot of sense. While I here was too far into my project to abandon it at that point, Idecided that I liam wasn't going to continue doing that once Ihad graduated. I then had a just brief period when Itried to work with less artificial creatures than la- boratory rats - mainly wild rats - but that just didn't work out. You eueniuallu moved from Australia to South Africa. When was that? :::ana- That "vas in the mid-50's. By that time, Ihad made the switch from animals to children. I was doing Piagetian-type work with children'' but, being back in South Africa, there were enormous pressures to get say back into social psychology. Ihad done my M.A. thesis in social psy- mg chology at the University of Cape Town. While Iwas in Natal, Cordon f this Allport spent about half a year there on a sabbatical. That was quite interesting in terms of getting a more, shall we say, intimate insight holo~ into the strengths and weaknesses of American social psychology .at, as - seeing it transplanted into a very different environment. _354 P & M 73, 1995 Would YOll like to expand 011 that? Allport was very famous for his work 011 prejudice. Well exactly. This was right after the publication of his book on preju- dice.? He was very committed to the topic and strongly convinced of the social good that was likely to result from studies of prejudice.
Recommended publications
  • What Is a Polycentric History of Psychology?1
    CLIO-PSYCHÉ What is a polycentric history of psychology?1 O que é uma história policêntrica da psicologia? ¿Qué es una historia policéntrica de la psicologia? Adrian C. Brock* Independent Scholar ABSTRACT The term, “polycentric history of psychology” was originally used by Kurt Danziger and it has since been adopted by other historians of psychology. The article provides an introduction to this approach. The trend towards the internationalisation of psychology has led to the history of American psychology being supplemented by other local histories. Polycentric history is contrasted this approach. It is concerned with the interrelationships between centres and not individual centres considered in isolation. The article concludes with some examples of history that has been written from a polycentric perspective. Keywords: polycentric, history, Danziger, internationalisation, interrelationships. RESUMO O conceito "história policêntrica da psicologia" foi originalmente utilizado por Kurt Danziger e, desde então, tem sido adotado por outros historiadores da psicologia. O artigo faz uma introdução a esta perspectiva. A tendência à internacionalização da psicologia implicou que a história da psicologia norte- americana pudesse ser complementada com outras histórias locais. A história policêntrica contrasta com esta abordagem, pois se preocupa com as inter-relações entre os centros, e não pelos centros considerados isoladamente. O artigo finaliza com alguns exemplos de história que tem sido escritos a partir de uma perspectiva policêntrica. Palavras-chave: policêntrica história, Danziger, internacionalização, Inter- relações. RESUMEN El concepto “historia policéntrica de la psicología” fue originariamente utilizado por Kurt Danziger y, desde entonces, ha sido adoptado por otros historiadores de la psicología. El trabajo brinda una introducción a este enfoque.
    [Show full text]
  • "Danziger, Kurt" In: the Encyclopedia of Cross-Cultural
    1 Danziger, Kurt century. This may be typical of psychological concepts and categories in general but there are Adrian C. Brock some exceptions to the rule and, in his next University College Dublin , Ireland book, Marking the Mind: A History of Memory (2008), he examined the history of one of the Kurt Danziger (b. 1926) is Professor Emeritus oldest psychological concepts in existence. of Psychology at York University in Toronto, Danziger was born in Germany and Canada. He is a Fellow of the Canadian emigrated to South Africa at the age of 11. Psychological Association (CPA) and the Royal He continued his education in Cape Town up Society of Canada. He received the CPA to the masters level and then completed a Education and Training Award in 1994, having doctorate in experimental psychology at the played a major role in establishing the graduate University of Oxford in England. His first program in history and theory of psychology at teaching position was at the University of York University. Melbourne in Australia. He subsequently spent Danziger began his career in comparative eight years at two South African universities, a psychology but he became skeptical of the period that was interrupted by a two-year stay value of much of this research and began to do at Gadjah Mada University in Indonesia. His Piagetian-style research with children. A long- active opposition to the apartheid system in lasting engagement with social psychological South Africa led to threats and reprisals on the topics produced two books, a widely used part of what was becoming a repressive police textbook on socialization, which was translated state.
    [Show full text]
  • The Positivist Repudiation of Wundt Kurt Danziger
    Jouml of the History ofthe Behuvioral Sciences 15 (1979): 205-230. THE POSITIVIST REPUDIATION OF WUNDT KURT DANZIGER Near the turn of the century, younger psychologists like KUlpe, Titchener, and Eb- binghaus began to base their definition of psychology on the positivist philosophy of science represented by Mach and Avenarius, a development that was strongly op- posed by Wundt. Psychology was redefined as a natural science concerned with phenomena in their dependence on a physical organism. Wundt’s central concepts of voluntarism, value, and psychic causality were rejected as metaphysical, For psy- chological theory this resulted in a turn away from Wundt’s emphasis on the dynamic and central nature of psychological processes toward sensationalism and processes anchored in the observable peripher of the organism. Behaviorism represents a logical development of this point orview. I. PSYCHOLOGYAS SCIENCE What makes the early years in the history of experimental psychology of more than antiquarian interest are the fundamental disagreements that quickly separated its prac- titioners. These disagreements frequently concerned issues that are not entirely dead even today because they involve basic commitments about the nature of the discipline which had to be repeated by successive generations, either explicitly, or, with increasing fre- quency, implicitly. In the long run it is those historical divisions which involve fundamental questions about the nature of psychology as a scientific discipline that are most likely to prove il- luminating. Such questions acquired great urgency during the last decade of the nineteenth and the first few years of the present century, for it was during this period that psychologists began to claim the status of a separate scientific discipline for their subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Wundt's Psychological Experiment in the Light of His Philosophy of Science
    Psychol. Res. 42, 109-122 (1980) Psychological (Wundt Centennial Issue) Research © by Springer-Veflag• 1980 Wundt's Psychological Experiment in the Light of His Philosophy of Science Kurt Danziger York University, Ontario, Canada Summary. Wundt initiated the first systematic psychological research pro- gramme. This achievement occurred at the same time as his elaboration of a philosophy of science which was anti-inductivist and stressed the priority of explanatory motives. Specifically psychological explanations depended on concepts of psychological causality as manifested in apperceptive or volitional processes. The major differences between the Wundtian and other models of psychological experimentation can be understood in the light of this general approach. Thus experimenters and subjects had to be enlightened collabora- tors and the role of introspection was more significant in an explanatory than in a purely observational context. Wundt's special requirements for the psy- chological experiment led him to reject other early models as exemplified by the hypnotic experiment in which the experimenter-subject relationship was closer to what was to become the norm in the twentieth century. Introduction What earned Wundt a special place in the history of psychology was his laboratory, his experimental approach. His crucial contribution seems to fall in the area of meth- odology rather than in the area of substantive theoretical concepts or specific empiri- cal discoveries. But the exact nature of Wundt's major methodological contribution is not immedi- ately obvious. On the level of technique, whether in terms of hardware or in terms of procedure, he was associated with developments and improvements rather than with any original breakthrough.
    [Show full text]
  • Problematic Encounter: Talks on Psychology and History
    1 Problematic Encounter: Talks on Psychology and History Kurt Danziger Introduction (2010) ……………………………………………………………………… 2 (A) Background 1. The moral basis of historiography (1997) …………………………………………… 26 2. The autonomy of applied psychology (1990) ……………………………………….. 31 3. What I wish I knew in 1950 (1997) …………………………………………………. 39 (B) Psychological Objects 4. The social context of research practice and the priority of history (1993) ………….. 48 5. Natural kinds, human kinds and historicity (1997) ………………………………….. 55 6. Psychological objects, practice and history (1993) ………………………………….. 61 7. The historiography of psychological objects (2001) ………………………………… 87 (C) Consequences 8. Does the history of psychology have a future? (1994) ................................................ 96 9. Towards a polycentric history of psychology (1996) ………………………………. 112 (D) Historical Psychology 10. Long past, short history – the case of memory (2008) …………………………….. 120 11. Prospects of a historical psychology (2003) ………………………………………. 128 12. The Holy Grail of universality (2007) …………………………………...………… 138 2 Introduction (2010) When I was still a teacher of undergraduates, the beginning of each academic year was always a time for advising students on their course selections. I have long forgotten the details of these consultations, but there was one that remains in my mind to this day. It involved a young student who wanted to combine a heavy concentration of courses in psychology with an equally heavy concentration of courses on historical topics. However, she was worried that this would be regarded as a weird combination. Indeed, she said that her friends had told her it was weird and that casual comments by one or two faculty members had implied much the same thing. What did I think? Well, I thought it was a combination that made a lot of sense and advised her to go right ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • REDISCOVERING the HISTORY of PSYCHOLOGY: Interview with Kurt Danziger
    History of Psychology Copyright 2006 by the American Psychological Association 2006, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1–16 1093-4510/06/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/1093-4510.9.1.1 REDISCOVERING THE HISTORY OF PSYCHOLOGY: Interview with Kurt Danziger Adrian C. Brock University College Dublin Kurt Danziger is a senior scholar whose innovative contributions to the history of psychology have received widespread international recognition. This wide-ranging interview covers every aspect of Danziger’s work since the 1970s, including his early work on Wundt, his work on psychological methods that culminated in the book Constructing the Subject (1990), and his more recent work on psychological objects in Naming the Mind (1997). It also includes his thoughts on history of psychology in general and the related subject of historical psychology. The inter- viewer is a former student of Danziger and coeditor of a recent book on Danziger’s work. Kurt Danziger is a senior scholar whose innovative contributions to the history of psychology have received widespread international recognition. He was born in Germany in 1926 and emigrated to South Africa at the age of 11. After receiving degrees in chemistry and psychology from the University of Cape Town, he continued his studies at the newly established Institute of Experimental Psychology at the University of Oxford in England. His work there involved standard 1940s psychology experiments using laboratory rats (e.g., Danziger, 1953). After completing his doctorate, he joined the University of Melbourne in Australia where he did research in developmental psychology, studying children’s understanding of social relationships (e.g., Danziger, 1957).
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Critique Together Symposium Abstract Chimirri, Niklas Alexander
    Roskilde University Developing critique together symposium abstract Chimirri, Niklas Alexander Publication date: 2015 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Chimirri, N. A. (2015). Developing critique together: symposium abstract. Abstract from International Society for Theoretical psychology 16th Biennial Conference, Conventry, United Kingdom. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 04. Oct. 2021 International Society for Theoretical Psychology RESISTANCE AND RENEWAL International Society for Theoretical Psychology Programme and Abstracts Contents Programme Committee 2 Welcome to the ISTP 2015 Conference 3 Programme Surview 4 Symposia Sessions and Abstracts 25 Graduate Student Travel Awardee Biographies
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.What Is a Polycentric History of Psychology?
    Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia E-ISSN: 1808-4281 [email protected] Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Brasil Brock, Adrian C. What is a polycentric history of psychology? Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia, vol. 14, núm. 2, 2014, pp. 646-659 Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=451844508015 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative CLIO-PSYCHÉ What is a polycentric history of psychology?1 O que é uma história policêntrica da psicologia? ¿Qué es una historia policéntrica de la psicologia? Adrian C. Brock* Independent Scholar ABSTRACT The term, “polycentric history of psychology” was originally used by Kurt Danziger and it has since been adopted by other historians of psychology. The article provides an introduction to this approach. The trend towards the internationalisation of psychology has led to the history of American psychology being supplemented by other local histories. Polycentric history is contrasted this approach. It is concerned with the interrelationships between centres and not individual centres considered in isolation. The article concludes with some examples of history that has been written from a polycentric perspective. Keywords: polycentric, history, Danziger, internationalisation, interrelationships. RESUMO O conceito "história policêntrica da psicologia" foi originalmente utilizado por Kurt Danziger e, desde então, tem sido adotado por outros historiadores da psicologia. O artigo faz uma introdução a esta perspectiva.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology and Its History
    TAP23610.1177/0959354313502746Theory & Psychology Danziger 5research-art0icle2013 2746 Comment Theory & Psychology 23(6) 829–839 Psychology and its history © The Author(s) 2013 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0959354313502746 tap.sagepub.com Kurt Danziger York University Abstract During its relatively short history as a distinct discipline, psychology was accompanied by a historiography that projected the idea of psychology back to ancient times when such an idea did not in fact exist. As the modern discipline proliferated into a collection of weakly connected sub-disciplines, the textbook image of psychology’s ancient essence suggested that, in spite of the current messy reality, the subject had an unchanging core object that had always been there to be recognized. Earlier, that object was the psyche, later it was “human nature,” and more recently, the principles of human cognition. However, historiography plays a more useful role within the discipline when it takes the current multiplicity of psychological objects as its point of departure and explores the social context of their emergence. This entails a historical analysis of the language used to define, describe, categorize, and modify psychological objects. Keywords history, language of description, philosophy, philosophy of science, scientific progress Let me first lay to rest a myth that threatens to obscure the very real issues at stake in this discussion. The notion that I regard authors who trace the history of psychology to ancient Greece as “ignorant” not only lacks any support from my writings, on the con- trary, Aristotle happens to be the most cited author in my most recent book on the history of a psychological topic (Danziger, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Modern Psychology, 10Th
    This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank A History of Modern Psychology TENTH EDITION DUANE P. SCHULTZ University of South Florida SYDNEY ELLEN SCHULTZ Australia • Brazil • Japan • Korea • Mexico • Singapore • Spain • United Kingdom • United States This is an electronic version of the print textbook. Due to electronic rights restrictions, some third party content may be suppressed. Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. The publisher reserves the right to remove content from this title at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it. For valuable information on pricing, previous editions, changes to current editions, and alternate formats, please visit www.cengage.com/highered to search by ISBN#, author, title, or keyword for materials in your areas of interest. A History of Modern Psychology, © 2011 Wadsworth, Cengage Learning Tenth Edition ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright Duane P. Schultz and Sydney Ellen herein may be reproduced, transmitted, stored or used in any form or by Schultz any means graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including but not limited to photocopying, recording, scanning, digitizing, taping, Web distribu- Senior Publisher: Linda Schreiber-Ganster tion, information networks, or information storage and retrieval sys- Executive Editor: Jon-David Hague tems, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United Editorial Assistant: Sheli DeNola States Copyright
    [Show full text]
  • Wilhelm Wundt and the Emergence of Scientific Psychology
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by E-space: Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository Wilhelm Wundt and the emergence of scientific psychology Geoff Bunn looks at the gap between what Wundt hoped for intended to take up James’ provocative call- psychology and what actually came to pass to-arms and devote himself to the ‘somewhat suspect borderland between physiology I am prepared to say that Wundt is Then, in 1867, the revered American and philosophy’. He dedicated the last half the founder, not of experimental philosopher William James announced that of his life to this field, and subsequently psychology alone, but of psychology. ‘perhaps the time has come for psychology became known as ‘the father of experimental Edward B. Titchener (1921) to begin to be a science. Some measurements psychology’. have already been made in the region lying Wundt’s claims to this title are impressive. ‘ Virtually everything that happened in between the physical changes in the nerves His Principles of Physiological Psychology (1874) modern psychology was a repudiation and the appearance of consciousness,’ he was psychology’s first textbook. He opened of Wundt. Kurt Danziger (1990) ’ explained, ‘and more may come of it… the first laboratory to be exclusively devoted Helmholtz and a man named Wundt at to psychological experimentation at the n the mid-nineteenth century, Heidelberg are working on it.’ A challenge University of Leipzig in 1879, the event ‘ psychology did not exist as a formal had been laid down. that has been taken to mark the birth of academic discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Psychology in Autobiography Editor Leendert P
    Mos PATH IN PSYCHOLOGY Editor History of Psychology in History of PsychologyAutobiography in Autobiography Leendert P.Mos Editor PATH IN PSYCHOLOGY Published in Cooperation with Publications for the Advancement of Theory and History in Psychology (PATH) Series Editors: John M. Broughton, Columbia University, New York, NY Robert W. Rieber, Fordham University, New York, NY For other titles published in this series, go to www.springer.com/series/6381 Leendert P. Mos Editor History of Psychology in Autobiography Editor Leendert P. Mos University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada [email protected] ISSN 1574-048X ISBN 978-0-387-88500-1 e-ISBN 978-0-387-88499-8 DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-88499-8 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2009920194 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Preface My psyche is not a series of states of consciousness that are rigorously closed in on them- selves and inaccessible to anyone but me.
    [Show full text]