DOCSLIB.ORG

America and the Communist International Earl Browder

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
America and the Communist International Earl Browder AMERICA AND THE COMMUNIST INTERNATIONAL EARL BROWDER THE COMMUNIST INTERNATIONAL: A FORCE FOR WORLD DEMOCRACY ~ ... -,.A~ · X BITTELJ\IA . (R eview of the M onth) LENIN AND INTERNATIONAL LABOR UNITY D. Z. M NUlL KY TWENTY CENTS C. I. TWENTIETH _-\K N I VER SA R Y I SUE c5\. nnouncing A BOOK OF WORLD IMPORTANCE! Ready in March History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Prepared under the supervision of the Central Committee, C.P.S.U. "The study of the heroic history of the Bolshevik Party arms us with the knowledge of the law.s of social de­ velopment and political struggle, with the knowledge of the driving forces of the revolution. "The study of the history of the C.P.S.U. strengthens our confidence in the final victory of the great cause of the Party of Lenin and Stalin, the victory of Communism throughout the entire world." From Introduction to History of the C.P.S.U. "WITH THIS BOOK WE WILL RAISE UP A WHOLE GENERATION SCHOOLED IN THE BEST THOUGHT PRODUCED BY HUMANITY." Earl Browder, Theory as a Guide to Action 384 Pages. Cloth $1.00 • WORKERS LIBRARY PUBLISHERS P. 0. Box 148, Station D New York City VOL. XVIII, No.1 MARCH, 1939 'Jhe COMMUNIST A MAGAZINE OF THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF MARXISM-LENINISM PUBLISHED MONTHLY BY THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE ·u.s.A. EDITORS: EARL BROWDER, ALEX BITTELMAN, Y. ]. JEROME CONTENTS Review of the Month. A. B. 195 America and the Communist International EARL BROWDER 209 Lenin and the International Labor Move- ment D. Z. MANUILSKY. ~~~6 The Congress of the Communist Party of Cuba . WILLIAM Z. FOSTER 225 The Day of International Women's Solidarity . N. K. KRUPSKAYA 232 Canada-The Key to Anti-Fascist Unity of the English-Speaking Peoples . TIM BUCK 237 Deterioration of Labor Conditions During the Last Decade GEOGRE WALLACE 245 The Mexican Question in the Southwest EMMA TENAYUCA and HOMER BROOKS • 257 Class Forces in California Agriculture. HARRISON GEORGE Class Conflicts in the South, 185o-x86o HERBERT BIEL From the World Communist Press. Book Reviews HARRY ROBINSON. Entered as second class matter November 2, I927, at the Post Office at New York, N. Y., under the Act of March J, z879. Send checks, money orders and correspondence to THE COMMUNIST, P. 0. Box I48, Sta. D (5o E. I]th St.), New York. Subscription rates: $2.00 a year; II .oo for six months; foreign and Canada $2.50 a year. Single copies 20 cents. J'I!.INTED IN U.S.A. .....101 The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workingmen of all countries, unite! -Marx and Engels, 'The Communist Manifesto' The Communist International 1919--1939 REVIEW OF THE MONTH Twentieth Anniversary of the Communist International. A Marxist-Leninist International. Proletarian Dictatorship in Theory and Practice. Lenin's and Stalin's Teachings. Democracy and Dictatorship. What Is a Fascist Dic­ tatorship'! Communism and Fascism. The Anti-Fascist People's Front and the Higher Type of Socialist Democracy. What Is the Economic Outlook'! Reactionary Economy Drive Is a Disturbing Factor. What About the Growing National Debt'! Borrowing and Taxing. Contradictions Between Public Debt and Private Economy. Immediate and Long­ Range Solutions. Marx and Hamilton on Public Debts. Historical References and Comparisons. The Spanish War Is Extending. Compel Withdrawal of Hitler's and Mussolini's Invaders. Presi­ dent Roosevelt's Anti-Fascist Orientation and the Reactionary Maneuvers. Labor's Task and Duty. WENTY years ago this month­ revolutionary upsurge began in West· T March, 1919-representatives of em Europe. The new republican re­ Communist Parties of the most im­ gime in Germany, and the existence portant countries in the world assem­ there of Soviets of workers' and sol­ bled in Moscow, where they held their diers' deputies were having a revolu. first world congress and established tionizing influence over the rest of the (Third) Communist Interna­ Europe. It is true that the German tional. Thus had been formed an in­ revolution was a bourgeois and not a ternational revolutionary working socialist one and that the German class organization of a new type, a Soviets, because they were dominated Marxist-Leninist International. by Social-Democrats, soon became Lenin led in the work of the Con­ subordinated to the bourgeois parlia­ gress. In his report on bourgeois de­ ment. And in this lay the weakness mocracy and the proletarian dictator­ of that revolution. Yet it was a revolu­ ship. Lenin demonstrated the tion, which overthrew the regime of significance of Soviet power, the new William the Second, liberated the en­ type of govemmeJ..lt, as the genuine ergies of the masses, thus helping to democracy for the toiling people. The stimulate a revolutionary rise in the congress adopted an appeal to the other European countries. world proletariat, calling for decisive A widespread revolutionary move­ struggle for the proletarian dictator. ment was developing in Austria. In ship, for the victory of the Soviets in Hungary a Soviet republic was estab­ all countries. lished. And in many countries, Com­ While the young Soviet country munist Parties were coming into the was at that time preparing to re­ political arena on the basis of this sist foreign intervention, a widespread revolutionary wave. 195 196 THE COMMUNIST It was this sort of world situation deceived by the Kautskys, Bauers and in which the conditions matured for MacDonalds, is there any doubt that the unification of the various Com­ socialism would today be the prevail­ munist Parties in the Communist In­ ing system in most countries? No doubt ternational. Leninism became the at all. Had this happened, there guiding theory and practice of this would be no fascist dictatorships in new type of world labor organization. Germany and Italy, no second impe­ Learning from the model Communist rialist war, no economic crises, none Party, the Party of the Soviet Union, of the miseries and pain resulting to all the other parties affiliated in the the masses from dying capitalism. Communist International made the One does not have to rely upon Lenin-Stalin theory of the proletarian theory alone to show that this is true. dictatorship the basis and essence of Just take the Soviet Union, in which their ·struggles. the masses started out to build so­ The Left wing of the Socialist Party cialism, inheriting a relatively back­ of America, organized in 1918 under ward economy, largely agricultural, the leadership of Charles E. Ruthen­ ruined by years of imperialist war berg, which later founded the Com­ and foreign intervention. And see munist Party of the United States, what ·this country is proving as it pre­ made its main fight in the old Social­ pares for the Eighteenth Congress of ist Party and among the class-con­ its Communist Party which opens on scious workers generally on this fun­ March 10 in Moscow. It proves that damental issue: the acceptance of the Soviet power works. It abolished capi­ Lenin-Stalin theory of the dictator­ talism and has built in the main a ship of the proletariat. socialist system. It eliminated all the On this occasion of the twentieth causes that give rise to a country's anniversary of the founding of the imperialist aggression and to fascism. Communist International, and in the Fascist agents cannot for long survive. face of the increasing world offensive It knows how to deal with aggressors, of fascism and reaction, it is absolute­ to maintain the freedom and indepen­ ly imperative deeply to reflect upon dence of the country and to fight for and to consider the following truth. peace. The right to a job, to leisure, In the years 1918-:zo, the countries of to education and to security is guar­ Europe were passing through a revo­ anteed by the Stalin Constitution to lutionary crisis. The socialist revolu­ every citizen and is realized in actual tion was growing. Life itself had fact. then placed on the order of the day From 1932 to 1937, average annual the overthrow of capitalism and the wages for workers and office em­ establishment of the dictatorship of ployees have been more than doubled. the proletariat. Today, this should be The wage fund, out of which the so­ evident to all. If in the situation then cial security needs of the workers are prevailing the workers of the most im­ met, has increased in the same years portant capitalist countries had fol­ two and a half times. The gross in­ lowed the path of the Soviet proleta­ come of collective farmers has in­ riat, instead of letting themselves be creased in the four years from 1933 REVIEW OF THE MONTH 197 to 1937-2.7 times while the money tradictions between worker, peasant incomes paid out to the collective and intellectual, differences inherited farmers · in accordance with · their from capitalism, are disappearing, A work increased four and a half times moral and political unity of the in these years. whole of Soviet society is becoming a The development of the Third reality. So much so that the Commu­ Five-Year Plan-1937-1942-calls for nist Party of the Soviet Union, in an increase of industrial output of preparation for its Eighteenth Con­ 88 per cent. Production of articles of gress, is proposing to establish one consumption is to be increased 70 and the same requirement for Party per cent. And agricultural produc­ membership to hold good for all ap­ tion is to be increased 53 per cent. plicants, modifying in this sense its The same plan calls for a more than present constitution which lays down 50 per cent increase in consumption different requirements for persons of by the people of the Soviet Union, different social positions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marxism, Stalinism, and the Juche Speech of 1955: on the Theoretical De-Stalinization of North Korea
    Marxism, Stalinism, and the Juche Speech of 1955: On the Theoretical De-Stalinization of North Korea Alzo David-West This essay responds to the argument of Brian Myers that late North Korean leader Kim Il Sung’s Juche speech of 1955 is not nationalist (or Stalinist) in any meaningful sense of the term. The author examines the literary formalist method of interpretation that leads Myers to that conclusion, considers the pro- grammatic differences of orthodox Marxism and its development as “Marx- ism-Leninism” under Stalinism, and explains that the North Korean Juche speech is not only nationalist, but also grounded in the Stalinist political tradi- tion inaugurated in the Soviet Union in 1924. Keywords: Juche, Nationalism, North Korean Stalinism, Soviet Stalinism, Socialism in One Country Introduction Brian Myers, a specialist in North Korean literature and advocate of the view that North Korea is not a Stalinist state, has advanced the argument in his Acta Koreana essay, “The Watershed that Wasn’t” (2006), that late North Korean leader Kim Il Sung’s Juche speech of 1955, a landmark document of North Korean Stalinism authored two years after the Korean War, “is not nationalist in any meaningful sense of the term” (Myers 2006:89). That proposition has far- reaching historical and theoretical implications. North Korean studies scholars such as Charles K. Armstrong, Adrian Buzo, Seong-Chang Cheong, Andrei N. Lankov, Chong-Sik Lee, and Bala、zs Szalontai have explained that North Korea adhered to the tactically unreformed and unreconstructed model of nationalist The Review of Korean Studies Volume 10 Number 3 (September 2007) : 127-152 © 2007 by the Academy of Korean Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • "The National Question" Reconsidered
    From an Ecological Perspective: "The National Question" Reconsidered Jeremy Brecher NINETEEN-EIGHTY-SIX MARK ED THE HUNDREDTH ANNIVERSARY of a general strike throughout the United States for the eight hour day, best remembered today for the trial and judicial murder of the Haymarket Martyrs. That event came to be commemorated in the world-wide holiday May Day celebrating the international solidarity of labor. One hundred years later, May Day was barely acknowledged in North America, while in Moscow's Red Square tanks paraded and jet fighters screamed overhead. Similar celebrations occurred in the Soviet-dominated countries of Eastern Europe and in the anti-Soviet and mutually hostile Communist countries of Asia. The festival of international solidarity has been transformed into a celebration of national power. Yet the insubstantiality of national boundaries was well demonstrated on last year's May Day , not by workers of all lands joining in The Internationale, but by a cloud of radioactive dust circling the globe, carrying the message "Chernobyl is everywhere." It is in this context that I want to reconsider what radicals once called " the national question. " The problems of nationality, nationalism, and the nation state have proved over the past century to be the greatest stumbling blocks to the aspirations for a better world expressed in socialist, anarchist, communist, and related radical movements. Class has not so far proved to be a unifying bond which overcomes the conflicts among different peoples. Nor has the liberation of one people from oppression by another ensured pro-social behavior op the part of the formerly oppressed once in power.
    [Show full text]
  • Internationalism and Nationalism
    1952 Speeches/Documents Title: Internationalism and Nationalism Author: Liu Shaoqi Date: Source:. Foreign Languages Press, 1952 Description:. written in 1948, published in 1952 Introduction The revolution concerning the Communist Party of Yugoslavia adopted by the Information Bureau of the Communist Workers' Parties of Bulgaria, Rumania, Hungary, Poland the U.S.S.R., France, Czechoslovakia and Italy condemned the anti-Soviet position of the Tito clique - renegades of the proletariat. The resolution pointed out that this anti-Soviet position of the Tito clique proceeds from the nationalistic programme of the bourgeoisie and is leading to a betrayal of the cause of international unity of the working people and to a nationalist position. The resolution stated: “Such a nationalist position can only lead to Yugoslavia's denegation into an ordinary bourgeois republic, to the loss of its independence and to its transformation into a colony of the imperialist countries.” The resolution of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on the Yugoslav Party also pointed out that the Tito clique, because of its betrayal of a series of fundamental viewpoints of Marxism -Leninism, had fallen into the mire of bourgeois nationalism and bourgeois parties.. At the same time, our Central Committee pointed out that by passing this resolution, the Information Bureau was “fulfilling its obligations to the cause of preserving world peace and democracy, and of defending the people of Yugoslavia from the deception and aggression of American imperialism.” What, then, is bourgeois nationalism? What is the relation between Marxism-Leninism and the national question? Why is it that the anti-Soviet position of the Tito clique will make Yugoslavia a prey to the deception and aggression of American imperialism, and forfeit her independence, thereby transforming her into a colony of imperialism? The purpose of this article is to answer these questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialism and Nationalism in the Third World in the Age of Third Worldism
    METU Studies in Development, 44 (December), 2017, 281-300 Socialism and nationalism in the third world in the age of third worldism Erkan Doğan Kocaeli University, Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Kocaeli e-mail: [email protected] Abstract This article investigates the relationship between socialism and nationalism with a special emphasis on its Third Worldist variant. The Third Worldist orthodoxy of the post- colonial age blurred the boundaries between nationalism and socialism, with Third Worldist nationalism being an expression of resentment directed against imperialism and the uneven development produced by capitalism. Socialism was understood within this Third Worldist moment in terms of a nation’s political and economic liberation from foreign imperialist powers and their internal collaborators. Socialism was seen as something which would make nations politically and economically independent and developed. Key words: Third Worldism, socialism, national liberation, developmentalism. 1. Introduction In his work, The National Question in Marxist-Leninist Theory and Strategy, Walker Connor (1984: 19-20) points to three different strains of thought within the Marxist legacy in terms of its relationship to the national question. These strains can be read in a chronological sequence as the historical and intellectual sources of the gravitation of socialism towards nationalism from the mid-19th century to the post-colonial era. The first strain is represented by the “classical Marxism” of Marx and Engels and their leading disciples, which emphasized the primacy and indispensability of class struggle, therefore seeing socialism as being irreconcilable with nationalism. The second strain, generalizing the principle of the recognition of the right of self-determination in the realm of action, seems to have been crystallized in the historical experience of the Russian Revolution, opening the door to the implementation of socialism first in Asia and then in other geographies of what would later become the Third World.
    [Show full text]
  • Lenin on the Jewish Question: the Theoretical Setting YOAVPELED* Tel Aviv University
    Political Studies (1387), XXXV, 61-78 Lenin on the Jewish Question: the Theoretical Setting YOAVPELED* Tel Aviv University Western scholars studying Lenin’s writings on the Jewish question tend to view them as reflecting no more than the tactical needs of the struggles he conducted against the Jewish Bund. This article examines these writings in the context not of Lenin’s political quarrels with the Bund but of his theoretical conception of the relationship between modernization and ethnic conflict. Underlying Lenin’s views on the Jewish question and the positions he took vis-a-vis the Bund was a carefully considered theory of nationality grounded in a clearly defined Marxist outlook on history. That theory of nationality, however, happened to be erroneous in that it stipulated the gradual elimination of ethnic conflict as a by-product of modernization. In reality, as theorists of ethnicity have shown in the last 15 years, modernization may have the exactly opposite effect. For the benefits of modernity, whether economic or political, accrue in unequal measures to members of different ethnic groups, thus intensifying ethnic solidarity and the friction between ethnic communities. Lenin’s over- optimistic view of the effect of economic development on inter-ethnic relations caused him to judge the Jewish problem in Russia in an unrealistic way, and gave his comments on that problem the appearance of ad hoc tactical pronouncements. Introduction The Russian Social Democratic Labour Party (RSDLP, now the Communist Party of the Soviet Union) was founded at a meeting of revolutionary activists in the Belorussian city of Minsk in March of 1898.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/24/2021 04:08:44PM Via Free Access the National Question 119
    chapter 4 The National Question 1 The Nation and National Culture Prior to the outbreak of World War i, the national question was a pressing concern for Austrian Social Democracy. Quarrels and national conflicts not only jeopardised the existence and stability of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy, they also made it more difficult to achieve the primary objective Social Demo- cracy had set for itself: maintaining the unity of the working-class movement in a multi-ethnic state. As Austrian activists and leaders of the European labour movement became aware, it would be impossible to design a coherent and real- istic nationalities programme if arguments insufficiently discussed by the clas- sical Marxists remained unsolved.1 Among these were, for instance, the essence of the nation, traits that constitute a nation, and the relationship between soci- ety, nation, and state. In his early work, The Question of Nationalities and Social Democracy (1907), Bauer attempted to solve these, as well as related issues. He intended the text as a draft for a Social-Democratic political programme on the nationalities question under the Habsburg monarchy.2 In way of a preliminary study, Bauer’s text also contained remarkable sociological theory, which gran- ted it a place in the canon of classic contributions on the so-called ‘national question’.3 1 The classical Marxists did not codify a definition of the nation. It is possible to conclude from their texts on the Jewish question, pan-Slavism, colonialism, and the right of oppressed nations to independence that they conceived of the nation as a product of economic, social, and political relations rooted in territory and language.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Question Ibrahim Kaypakkaya
    the National Question Ibrahim Kaypakkaya Foreign Languages Press Foreign Languages Press Collection “Colorful Classics” #17 (English) A collection directed by Christophe Kistler Contact - [email protected] Paris, 2020 ISBN: 978-2-491182-15-1 Printing: • 1st printing: 100 copies • 2nd printing: 50 copies • 3rd printing: 200 copies This book is under license Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC-BY-SA 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Contents Publisher’s Note 5 A Short History of Ibrahim Kaypakkaya 11 The National Question in Turkey 1. The Theses of Safak Revisionism on the 17 National Question 2. To Whom is National Oppression 21 Applied? 3. What is the Aim of National Oppression? 31 4. The Racist Policy of Imperialism and 37 the Racist Policy of the Indigenous Ruling Classes 5. The Champions of National Oppression 41 in Turkey and their Accomplices 6. “Popular Movement” and National 47 Movement 7. The Development of National Move- 55 ments in Eastern Europe and Asia 8. The Kurdish National Movement 59 9. The Democratic Content of the Kurdish 71 National Movement 10. Within the Kurdish national move- 75 ment, the “positive” action of the bourgeoi- sie and small landlords aiming to strengthen nationalism 11. What should the attitude of the 79 class-conscious proletariat of Turkey be to the Kurdish national movement? 12. Let us not deny the influence of domi- 97 nant nation nationalism on Turkish workers and peasants 13. A People’s Right to Self-Determination, 99 a Nation’s Right to Self-Determination 14. “A nations’ right of self-determination” 103 means nothing less than the right to estab- lish a separate state 15.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bolsheviks and the National Question, 1917-1923"
    Jeremy Robert Charnock Smith "THE BOLSHEVIKS AND THE NATIONAL QUESTION, 1917-1923" ilavq*; % PhD. Thesis The School of Slavonic and East European Studies University of London - 1 - ProQuest Number: 10018671 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10018671 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ABSTRACT This thesis examines the formulation and execution of policies towards the various nationalities of the Soviet Republics from the October revolution of 1917 until the formation of the Soviet Union in 1923. Most of the Russian and Western literature on this question focuses on the process of the reincorporation of the non-Russian regions of the former empire into the new Bolshevik-led state. Accordingly, there is a general assumption that the purpose of Bolshevik national policy was to gain the short-term support of the national minorities in the struggle to win the civil war. By examining the material newly released from the Soviet archives in addition to the material previously available, I have concluded that the goal of Bolshevik nationality policies was to "raise the cultural level" of the non-Russians and to eliminate the inequalities arising from economic and historical conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Marxists and the National Question
    Michael Löwy Marxists and the National Question The aim of this article is to isolate certain key theoretical and methodological aspects of the classic Marxist debate on the national question: a debate which had its starting-point in the relatively imprecise positions developed by Marx and Engels themselves in their writings, and which was carried on vigorously in the Second International before the First World War, culminating in Lenin’s formulation of a realistic revolutionary theory of the right of nations to self- determination. Marx and Engels: Nationality and Internationalism Marx offered neither a systematic theory of the national question, a precise definition of the concept of a ‘nation’, nor a general political strategy for the proletariat in this domain. His articles on the subject were, for the most part, concrete political statements relating to specific cases. As far as the ‘theoretical’ texts proper are concerned, the best-known and most influential are undoubtedly 81 the rather cryptic passages in the Manifesto concerning communists and the nation. These passages have the historical value of proclaiming in a bold and uncompromising way the internationalist nature of the prole- tarian movement, but they are not always free from a certain economism and a surprising amount of Free Tradist optimism. This can be seen particularly in the suggestion that the victorious proletariat will merely carry on the task of abolishing national antagonisms which was begun by ‘the development of the bourgeoisie, Free Trade, the world market’, etc. This idea, however, is contradicted in other texts from the same period, in which Marx stressed that ‘while the bourgeoisie of each nation still retained separate national interests, big industry created a class, which in all nations has the same interest and with which nation- ality is already dead’.1 In his later writings (particularly those on the question of Ireland), Marx showed that not only does the bourgeoisie tend to foster national antagonisms, but it actually tends to increase them, since: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • In Defense of the Right to Political Secession for the Afro-American Nation
    IN DEFENSE OF THE RIGHT TO POLITICAL SECESSION FOR THE AFRO-AMERICAN NATION Papers and Resolutions from the School on the Afro-American National Question September, 1982 $2.50 TABLE OF CONTENTS DOCUMENTS FROM SCHOOL ON AFRO-AMERICAN NATIONAL QUESTION Introduction — In Defense of the Right to Political Secession for the Afro-American Nation . 1 Marxism and the National-Colonial Question 3 The Development of the Afro-American Nation 16 Against Revisionism on the Afro-American National Question 24 Bibliography 41 Has the Afro-American Nation 'Disappeared?' 42 Statement by the Red Dawn Collective 45 Resolutions 46 Sponsored by: Revolutionary Political Organization Marxist Leninist Amilcar Cabral/Paul Robeson Collective Also participating: Red Dawn Collective and progressive anti-imperialist fighters ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PAMPHLET MAY BE ORDERED FROM: Revolutionary Political Organization Marxist-Leninist P.O. Box 15914 New Orleans, Louisiana 70175 Amilcar Cabral/Paul Robeson Collective P.O. Box 27314 Raleigh, North Carolina 26610 Red Dawn Collective P.O. Box 1854 Manhattanville Station New York, New York 10027 PRICE: $2.50 Bulk Rates Available Introduction In Defense of the Right to Political Secession for the Afro-American Nation The articles published in this pamphlet were originally others. Thus, we see growing and intensifying political presented at the Marxist-Leninist School on the Afro- tyranny and suffering inflicted upon the Afro-American American National Question, held in September, 1982, in Nation, manifested in the revival of the fascist movement, the Black Belt. Participating in the conference were the KKK, the Moral Majority, etc., using the doctrine of members of three organizations — the Amilcar white supremacy as its main tenet.
    [Show full text]
  • Eric Hobsbawm and the National Question
    IRSH 53 (2008), pp. 63–99 DOI: 10.1017/S0020859007003343 # 2008 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis Class, Nation, and Capitalist Globalization: Eric Hobsbawm and the National Question Wade Matthews Summary: This article will argue that scholars concerned with the nexus between socialism and nationalism have overlooked the work of Eric Hobsbawm, the foremost present-day Marxist historian and a key theorist of modern nationalism. The article will repair that neglect by providing the first systematic analysis of Hobsbawm’s encounter with the national question. It will contend that Hobs- bawm’s work is a key site for those interested in exploring the clash between class- consciousness and national identity, and that his historical and political writing provides a unique window on the nexus between nationalism and socialism in the last half of the twentieth century. The article will also suggest that Hobsbawm’s changing conception of the relationship between nationalism and socialism is crucial to an understanding of the shifts his politics have undergone in the last three decades or so. Eric Hobsbawm is ‘‘the premier Marxist historian working today’’.1 This assessment is not simply based on the extent of a disciplinary expertise which traverses centuries, continents and cultures, across social, political, and economic history. It is founded on Hobsbawm’s mastery of general- ization and synthesis and a corresponding ability to incorporate ‘‘theory’’ and ‘‘history’’ into his historical practice.2 The combination of these strengths of breadth, craft and detail was particularly evident in his analysis of the national question. Perhaps more than any other twentieth-century Marxist historian, Hobsbawm has persistently addressed issues of 1.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL SELF-DETERMINATION, AS UNDERSTOOD by LENIN and the BOLSHEVIKS Rudolf A
    LITHUANIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES 13 2008 ISSN 1392-2343 PP. 21–39 NATIONAL SELF-DETERMINATION, AS UNDERSTOOD BY LENIN AND THE BOLSHEVIKS Rudolf A. Mark Abstract. The article gives an abridged introduction to the genesis of the term ‘right to self-determination’ from the mid-nineteenth century. It also illustrates the term’s usage before and after the Bolshevik Revolution. The right to self-determination played a crucial role in the political discourse of socialist parties in Central and Eastern Europe on the eve of World War One. The Bolsheviks made use of the term as a slogan to fight imperialism and to make non-Russian nationalities side with the Soviet project of estab- lishing the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Introduction At the turn of 1917–18 due to Wilson’s Fourteen Points programme the concept of the ‘Right of Self-Determination’ started to play an increasingly prominent part in world politics in general and in Europe in particular. The idea that the right to legit- imate dominion rests upon the consent of the governed people had emerged in the Middle Ages and has been elaborated in the course of political thought over past centuries. In the nineteenth century it was in the context of the Polish question in 1865 that the ‘right to self-determination’ was first used in an official proclamation. On suggestion of Karl Marx, 1 it was issued by the First International in order to mobilize the Polish population and to set it against Russian rule as the headline of the proclamation made clear: ‘De la nécessité d’anéantir l’influence russe en Europe pour l’application du droit des peoples de disposer d’eux-mêmes et de reconstruire une Pologne sur des bases démocratiques et sociales’.
    [Show full text]