Burnley / Pendle Growth Corridor Strategy Stage 1: Data Collection and Problem Identification Report June 2014 Document Control Sheet BPP 04 F8 Version 16 Oct 2013 Project: Burnley / Pendle Growth Corridor Strategy Client: Lancashire County Council Project No: B2237506 Document title: Stage 1: Data Collection and Problem Identification Report Ref. No: B2237506/Stage 1/000 Originated by Checked by Reviewed by NAME NAME NAME ORIGINAL Steve Webb Mark Romanowski Peter Hibbert NAME As Project Manager I confirm that the above INITIALS Approved by document(s) have been subjected to Jacobs’ Mike Cammock Check and Review procedure and that I approve them for issue MC DATE 27th February 2014 Document status: Draft REVISION NAME NAME NAME Steve Webb Mark Romanowski Peter Hibbert NAME As Project Manager I confirm that the above INITIALS Approved by document(s) have been subjected to Jacobs’ Mike Cammock Check and Review procedure and that I approve them for issue MC DATE 26th June 2014 Document status: Draft v2 REVISION NAME NAME NAME Steve Webb Mark Romanowski Peter Hibbert NAME As Project Manager I confirm that the above INITIALS Approved by document(s) have been subjected to Jacobs’ Mike Cammock Check and Review procedure and that I approve them for issue MC DATE 30th June 2014 Document status: FINAL REVISION NAME NAME NAME NAME As Project Manager I confirm that the above INITIALS Approved by document(s) have been subjected to Jacobs’ Check and Review procedure and that I approve them for issue DATE Document status Jacobs U.K. Limited This document has been prepared by a division, subsidiary or affiliate of Jacobs U.K. Limited (“Jacobs”) in its professional capacity as consultants in accordance with the terms and conditions of Jacobs’ contract with the commissioning party (the “Client”). Regard should be had to those terms and conditions when considering and/or placing any reliance on this document. No part of this document may be copied or reproduced by any means without prior written permission from Jacobs. If you have received this document in error, please destroy all copies in your possession or control and notify Jacobs. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this document (a) should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole; (b) do not, in any way, purport to include any manner of legal advice or opinion; (c) are based upon the information made available to Jacobs at the date of this document and on current UK standards, codes, technology and construction practices as at the date of this document. It should be noted and it is expressly stated that no independent verification of any of the documents or information supplied to Jacobs has been made. No liability is accepted by Jacobs for any use of this document, other than for the purposes for which it was originally prepared and provided. Following final delivery of this document to the Client, Jacobs will have no further obligations or duty to advise the Client on any matters, including development affecting the information or advice provided in this document. This document has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Client and unless otherwise agreed in writing by Jacobs, no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of this document. Should the Client wish to release this document to a third party, Jacobs may, at its discretion, agree to such release provided that (a) Jacobs’ written agreement is obtained prior to such release; and (b) by release of the document to the third party, that third party does not acquire any rights, contractual or otherwise, whatsoever against Jacobs and Jacobs, accordingly, assume no duties, liabilities or obligations to that third party; and (c) Jacobs accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage incurred by the Client or for any conflict of Jacobs’ interests arising out of the Client's release of this document to the third party. Contents Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Background 3 1.2 Rationale for Study 3 1.3 Report Purpose 5 1.4 Report Structure 5 2 Study Area 6 2.1 Introduction 6 2.2 Study Area 6 2.3 Transport Links 7 2.4 Employment Sites 7 2.5 Parallel Route 8 2.6 Methodology 10 2.7 Sources of Information 11 3 Data Collection and Problem Identification Stage 12 3.1 Introduction 12 3.2 Data Collection and Analysis 12 3.3 Problems and Issues Workshop 13 3.4 Existing / Future Problems and Objectives 13 3.5 Stage 1 Data Collection and Problem Identification Report 13 4 Review of Previous Studies 14 4.1 Introduction 14 4.2 Route Management Strategy – M65/A56/M66 (Highways Agency, October 2003) 14 4.3 M65 Corridor Study (Halcrow, April 2010) 16 4.4 M65 to Yorkshire Corridor Study (Jacobs, June 2013) 17 4.5 Highways Agency Route Based Strategy (Highways Agency, For Consultation October 2013) 18 4.6 Burnley Growth Corridor Pinch Point Bid (Lancashire County Council, February 2013) 19 5 Development Proposals 21 5.1 Introduction 21 5.2 Review of Local Development Documentation 21 5.3 Development sites 24 5.4 Key Development Sites 26 6 Traffic Flow Analysis 28 6.1 Introduction 28 6.2 Annual Average Daily Traffic Volumes 28 6.3 Daily Traffic Flow Profiles 32 6.4 M65 Flow to Capacity Ratio 39 6.5 Site Visit Observations 40 7 Congestion Analysis 41 7.1 Introduction 41 7.2 Strat-e-gis Data 41 7.3 Congestion 42 7.4 Route Analysis 44 7.5 M65 Junction Analysis 51 7.6 Air Quality Management Areas 61 8 Traffic Signals 63 8.1 Introduction 63 8.2 Traffic Signal Locations 63 9 Accident Data Analysis 68 9.1 Introduction 68 9.2 Study Area Accidents 68 9.3 M65 Accidents 69 9.4 M65 Motorway Junction Accidents 69 9.5 Parallel Route Accidents 70 9.6 Parallel Route Accident Rate 72 10 Public Transport 74 10.1 Introduction 74 10.2 Bus Services 74 10.3 Bus Patronage 76 10.4 Rail Services 86 10.5 Rail Patronage 87 10.6 Rail Station Facilities 89 11 Socio-Economic Analysis 90 11.1 Introduction 90 11.2 Population 91 11.3 Employment 91 11.4 Travel to Work Patterns 94 11.5 Car Ownership 96 11.6 Index of Multiple Deprivation 97 12 Problems and Issues Workshop 100 12.1 Introduction 100 12.2 Workshop Purpose 100 12.3 Attendees 100 12.4 Meeting Agenda 101 12.5 Problems and Issues 101 13 Study Objectives 104 13.1 Introduction 104 13.2 Study Objectives 104 14 Next Steps 107 14.1 Introduction 107 14.2 Option Identification 107 14.3 Early Sifting 107 14.4 Option Development and Appraisal 108 14.5 Strategy Development 108 14.6 Stage 2 Report 108 15 Summary and Conclusions 109 15.1 Summary 109 15.2 Conclusions 109 Tables Table 2-A: Parallel Route Sections 9 Table 4-A: Route Functions of the M65 15 Table 4-B: HA RMS Problems/Issues Associated With the M65 15 Table 5-A: Hyndburn Housing Targets 23 Table 5-B: Development Sites 25 Table 5-C: Key Development Sites and Impact 26 Table 6-A: M65 Flow to Capacity Ratios 39 Table 7-A: Statistical Reliability of Strat-e-gis Data 42 Table 7-B: Total Delay Summary 42 Table 7-C: M65 Time - East and Westbound 45 Table 7-D: M65 Delay - East and Westbound 45 Table 7-E: M65 Average Speed - East and Westbound 45 Table 7-F: Parallel Route Time - East & Westbound 48 Table 7-G: Parallel Route Delay - East & Westbound 48 Table 7-H: Parallel Route Average Speed - East & Westbound 48 Table 7-I: Summary Statistics of the M65 Junction 7 Analysis 52 Table 7-J: Summary Statistics of the M65 Junction 8 Analysis 53 Table 7-K: Summary Statistics of the M65 Junction 9 Analysis 54 Table 7-L: Summary Statistics of the M65 Junction 10 Analysis 55 Table 7-M: Summary Statistics of the M65 Junction 11 Analysis 56 Table 7-N: Summary Statistics of the M65 Junction 12 Analysis 57 Table 7-O: Summary Statistics of the M65 Junction 13 Analysis 58 Table 7-P: Summary Statistics of the M65 Junction 14 Analysis 59 Table 7-Q: Percentage of Junction Time Spent in Delay, M65 Junctions 7 to 14 60 Table 8-A: Traffic Signal Locations 64 Table 9-A: Study Area Accidents (2008-12) 68 Table 9-B: M65 Accidents (2008-12) Junction 7 to Junction 14 69 Table 9-C: Parallel Route Accidents (2008-12) 70 Table 9-D: Parallel Route Accidents (2008-12) by Section 71 Table 9-E: Predicted and Observed Accident Numbers on the Parallel Route (2008-12) 72 Table 9-F: Predicted and Observed Accidents on the Parallel Route by Section (2008-12) 73 Table 10-A: Bus Services and Frequency 75 Table 10-B: Service X43 Average Daily Patronage 78 Table 10-C: Service 152 Average Daily Patronage 80 Table 10-D: Service 23 Average Daily Patronage 82 Table 10-E: Service 28 Average Daily Patronage 84 Table 10-F: Railway Station Usage Figures 87 Table 10-G: Local Rail Station Facilities 89 Table 11-A: Population 91 Table 11-B: Age Structure 91 Table 11-C: Employment 91 Table 11-D: Employment Type 92 Table 11-E: Job Vacancies 92 Table 11-F: Travel to Work Method 95 Table 11-G: Travel to Work Distance 95 Table 11-H: Car Ownership 96 Table 12-A: Workshop Problems and Issues 103 Figures Figure 1-A: East Lancashire Connectivity Study Key Components 4 Figure 2-A: Study Area 6 Figure 2-B: Parallel Route to the M65 Motorway 9 Figure 2-C: Burnley / Pendle Growth Corridor Strategy Methodology 10 Figure 3-A: Data Collection and Problem Identification Stage 12 Figure 5-A: Key Development Sites 27 Figure 6-A: ATC Locations for M65 AADT Analysis 29 Figure 6-B: M65 Junction 7 to Junction 14 2-Way AADT 29 Figure 6-C: ATC locations for Parallel Route AADT Analysis 31 Figure 6-D: Parallel Route 2-Way AADT 31 Figure 6-E: ATC Locations for Flow Profiling 33 Figure 6-F: Average Annual Weekday Traffic Flow Profile - Site 3230 A682 Manchester Road 34 Figure 6-G: Average Annual