Change of Regulatory Framework to Temporary, Rural‐Urban Migration in China

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Change of Regulatory Framework to Temporary, Rural‐Urban Migration in China Conference Urban‐Rural Linkages and Migration September 17th 2009, Workshop Input Change of regulatory framework to temporary, rural‐urban migration in China: A case study of Hukou System in China Prof. & Dr. Zhang Jijiao Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Chair, Commission on Enterprise Anthropology, IUAES Background In most developing nations, economic development has promoted massive and uncontrolled migration from the countryside into urban areas (Kasarda and Crenshaw 1991). Rural‐urban migration is a pervasive feature in the developing countries. In general, urban areas are centers of development. Incomes tend to be higher and economic opportunities greater. Driven by real or perceived differentials in economic opportunities (Lee 1966; Todero 1976), the needs of families to diversify risk in the absence of formal insurance mechanisms (Portes and Böröcz 1989), and social network connections with others who have preceded them (Massey et al. 1993), peasants flock to the cities in search of better lives. Rural‐urban migration is thus an important channel of social mobility. China's Hukou1 (household) registration system, set up in 1958, divides the population into rural households and non‐rural households, and individual interests and rights, such as education, healthcare, housing and employment, are linked to the household registration. Under the system, rural citizens have no access to social welfare in cities, even though they may live and work there. The hukou system has had its intended effect, severely restricting rural‐to‐urban migration (Johnson 1994; Yang 1993). The central mechanism regulating population flows was Hukou system, which, until the onset of the reforms in 1978, effectively tied Chinese citizens to their place of residence. The time for fundamental reform of the registration system seems to have arrived. 1 "Hukou" has been adopted by English-language audiences to refer to both the huji system and an individual's hukou. 1 Conference Urban‐Rural Linkages and Migration September 17th 2009, Workshop Input 1. What is the household registration A Hukou or huji refers to the system of residency permits which dates back to ancient China, where household registration is required by law in mainland China and Taiwan. A hukou can also refer to a family register in many contexts since the household registration record is issued per family, and usually includes the personel information of all members in the family. In China, family registers were in existence as early as the Xia Dynasty (BC. 2100 ‐ 1600). In the centuries which followed, the family register developed into an organization of families and clans for purposes of taxation, conscription and social control. A similar household registration system exists within the public administration structures of Japan (koseki), Vietnam, and North Korea (Hoju). In South Korea the Hoju system was abolished on 1 January 2008. A householder has two pages: One page (the first page) for the whole family in the booklet. Another page (the second page) is his/her personel information. Every other family member has one page to record his/her personel information. A household registration record officially identifies a person as a resident of an area and includes identifying information such as: (1)name, (2)relation with householder, (3)former name,(4)gender, (5) ethnic group, (6) birth date, (7) birth place, (8) native place, (9) blood, (10) ID Number, (12) marriage, (13) education, (14) occupation, (15) working institution, (16)religion,(17) stature, (18) military service, (19,20) when & where move from and move to. In the booklet, there some pages for recording changes and correction. Every family member has another page for change record and error correction. The ‘place of birth’ and ‘permanent residence’ items in the household booklet may seem fairly innocent, but in fact they were the cornerstones of rural‐urban migration control. All people were assigned a registration status as either ‘agricultural’ or ‘urban’. Newly‐born babies were registered at the place of permanent residence of the mother, even if they were actually born at a different location. This meant that the ‘agricultural’ or ‘urban’ status of individuals was inherited through the mother. The rationale for passing the rural/urban status along maternal lines was that men generally tend to be more mobile than women; inheritance of status from the father would therefore add more children to the urban population. Through resident registration, the system can help uphold citizens' civil rights and can also provide basic information when the government is drawing up national economic and 2 Conference Urban‐Rural Linkages and Migration September 17th 2009, Workshop Input social‐development plans and arranging the rational distribution of the workforce. The household‐registration system is an important part of ‐‐ as well the basis of ‐‐ the State administration. For public security departments, such a system plays a major function in safeguarding public security and fighting against crime. 2. Hukou System before economic reform (1958‐ 1978) In 1958, the Chinese government began using the family register system ‘PRC Regulations on household registration’of 1958 (Regulations, 1958) to control the movement of people between urban and rural areas. Individuals were broadly categorised as a "rural (agricultural )" or "urban (non‐agricultural )". It supported by the employment, rationing, and housing systems, these regulations effectively constrained rural‐urban migration until the early 1980s. The first of these was central control over employment. After the introduction of communes in the countryside, work (and income) was allocated by the production team (or sometimes the brigade) to its members, thereby effectively tying the peasants to their home villages. With its commitment to full employment, the socialist state controlled all urban employment. A second factor related to the enforcement of the registration rules was the supply of daily commodities, especially staple foods. Over the course of the 1950s, the state monopolized the distribution of virtually all goods, and most free markets disappeared. The peasants grew their own food, of course, but state procurement left them with little more than a bare minimum, and that again was allocated on the basis of team membership. The food products procured from the peasants served to feed the urban population. The state supplied the cities with grain and other foodstuffs at low prices. At that time, Hukou was extremely important. People were required to stay at the small area they were born (where the Hukou is), and stay there until they die. They cannot move around. They can travel, but there was no access to job, public services, education, or even food in other places. It is just like visiting other places with a B‐1 (business) type of American visa ‐ you can visit, but cannot work there (it is illegal), cannot go to school (not accepted), cannot go to hospital (without a hukou, you are not treated). For food, in those old days, you cannot buy food no matter how much money you have. You need to use grain coupon (“Liangpiao”, The currency for food) with money together to get food. 3 Conference Urban‐Rural Linkages and Migration September 17th 2009, Workshop Input So basically, at that time, without Hukou, people cannot move. There were very few people move around in the country, but their status was practically the same as illegal immigrants in U.S. Two other factors that contributed to the effective enforcement of the registration regulations were the severe shortage in and public allocation of urban housing, and a climate of strict social and political control. Under the system, rural citizens have little access to social welfare in cities and are restricted from receiving public services such as education, medical care, housing and employment, regardless of how long they may have lived or worked in the city. To move Hukou from one place to other is very hard ‐ just as hard as getting green card for U.S. It is even harder to move from rural area to city. To move from rural to rural was easier, but to move from rural to city was very hard.It took many years. Only in very few situations it had happened. The household registration system did not only preclude official migration from the countryside to urban areas. For all practical purposes, the entire country was divided into a hierarchy of places: The resettlement of people, be they cadres, workers, military personnel, family members, or some other category, is permitted if they have certification of movement. This certification is the only acceptable criterion to be used in determining the permissibility of the following types of movement (migration): in cases involving persons moving from the countryside to the city, from town to city, from small city to large city, or from normal‐sized city to one of the three centrally administered cities of Shanghai, Beijing, or Tianjin. As well as this, it also covers those who wish to move from rural regions to the city outskirts, or to the outskirts of a town located in a rural region, or near state farms, vegetable teams, or economic crop regions. In dealing with such people there is but one rule, and that is that procedures for resettlement must be based on the certification of migration. (Zhang 1988: 78) Thus, only moves between communities of the same rank or to communities of a lower rank were permitted without going through special
Recommended publications
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Kenneth J. Ruoff Contact Information
    CURRICULUM VITAE Kenneth J. Ruoff Contact Information: Department of History Portland State University P.O. Box 751 Portland, OR 97207-0751 Tel. (503) 725-3991 Fax. (503) 725-3953 e-mail: [email protected] http://web.pdx.edu/~ruoffk/ Education Ph.D. 1997 Columbia University History M.Phil. 1993 Columbia University History M.A. 1991 Columbia University History B.A. 1989 Harvard College East Asian Studies Study of advanced Japanese, Inter-University Center (formerly known as the Stanford Center), Yokohama, Japan, 1993-1994 (this is a non-degree program). Awards Tim Garrison Faculty Award for Historical Research, Portland State University, 2020. For Japan's Imperial House in the Postwar Era, 1945-2019. Ambassador, Hokkaido University, 2019-present. Branford Price Millar Award for Faculty Excellence, Portland State University, Spring 2015. For excellence in the areas of research and teaching, in particular, but also for community service. Commendation, Consulate General of Japan, Portland, OR, December 2014. For enriching the cultural landscape of Portland through programs sponsored by the Center for Japanese Studies and for improving the understanding of Japan both through these programs and through scholarship. Frances Fuller Victor Award for General Nonfiction (best work of nonfiction by an Oregon author), Oregon Book Awards sponsored by the Literary Arts Organization, 2012. For Imperial Japan at Its Zenith: The Wartime Celebration of the Empire’s 2,600th Anniversary. Jirõ Osaragi Prize for Commentary (in Japanese, the Osaragi Jirõ rondanshõ), 2004, awarded by the Asahi Newspaper Company (Asahi Shinbun) for the best book in the social sciences published in Japan during the previous year (For Kokumin no tennõ; translation of The People’s Emperor).
    [Show full text]
  • ID ENABLING ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT (IDEEA) Guidance Note
    ID ENABLING ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT (IDEEA) Guidance Note Please provide comments to [email protected]. © 2018 International Bank for Reconstitution and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street, NW, Washington, D.C., 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000; Internet: www.worldbank.org Some Rights Reserved This work is a product of the staff of The World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of The World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or waiver of the privileges and immunities of The World Bank, or of any participating organization to which such privileges and immunities may apply, all of which are specifically reserved. Rights and Permissions This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license (CC BY 3.0 IGO) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo. Under the Creative Commons Attribution license, you are free to copy, distribute, transmit, and adapt this work, including for commercial purposes, under the following conditions: Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: World Bank. 2017. ID Enabling Environment Assessment, Washington, DC: World Bank License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO (CC BY 3.0 IGO) Translations—If you create a translation of this work, please add the following disclaimer along with the attribution: This translation was not created by The World Bank and should not be considered an official World Bank translation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Robot Koseki: a Japanese Law Model for Regulating Autonomous Machines Colin P.A
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Commons @ UM Law Journal of Business & Technology Law Volume 14 | Issue 2 Article 3 The Robot Koseki: A Japanese Law Model for Regulating Autonomous Machines Colin P.A. Jones Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/jbtl Recommended Citation Colin P. Jones, The Robot Koseki: A Japanese Law Model for Regulating Autonomous Machines, 14 J. Bus. & Tech. L. 403 () Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/jbtl/vol14/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Academic Journals at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Business & Technology Law by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Robot Koseki: A Japanese Law Model for Regulating Autonomous Machines COLIN P.A. JONES*© ABSTRACT After touching on some of the conceptual and practical hurdles facing the developing field of robot law, this article will describe the Japanese koseki system of family registration and then explain why it offers a source of models and analogies that are useful in the development of a framework for regulating robots. INTRODUCTION: WHAT TO DO ABOUT ROBOTS A review of the growing body of literature on the relatively new subject of “robotics law” reveals a number of common themes. For example, many works reflexively reference Isaac Asimov’s famous but fictional “three laws of robotics” as a touchstone,1 though it is unclear whether they will * Professor, Doshisha Law School (Kyoto, Japan); A.B., UC Berkeley; LL.M., Tohoku University Graduate Faculty of Law; J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of the Parliamentary Democracy in Japan: an Historical Approach
    The Birth of the Parliamentary Democracy in Japan: An Historical Approach Csaba Gergely Tamás * I. Introduction II. State and Sovereignty in the Meiji Era 1. The Birth of Modern Japan: The First Written Constitution of 1889 2. Sovereignty in the Meiji Era 3. Separation of Powers under the Meiji Constitution III. The Role of Teikoku Gikai under the Meiji Constitution (明治憲法 Meiji Kenp ō), 1. Composition of the Teikoku Gikai ( 帝國議会) 2. Competences of the Teikoku Gikai IV. The Temporary Democracy in the 1920s 1. The Nearly 14 Years of the Cabinet System 2. Universal Manhood Suffrage: General Election Law of 1925 V. Constitutionalism in the Occupation Period and Afterwards 1. The Constitutional Process: SCAP Draft and Its Parliamentary Approval 2. Shōch ō ( 象徴) Emperor: A Mere Symbol? 3. Popular Sovereignty and the Separation of State Powers VI. Kokkai ( 国会) as the Highest Organ of State Power VII. Conclusions: Modern vs. Democratic Japan References I. INTRODUCTION Japanese constitutional legal history does not constitute a part of the obligatory legal curriculum in Hungary. There are limited numbers of researchers and references avail- able throughout the country. However, I am convinced that neither legal history nor comparative constitutional law could be properly interpreted without Japan and its unique legal system and culture. Regarding Hungarian-Japanese legal linkages, at this stage I have not found any evidence of a particular interconnection between the Japanese and Hungarian legal system, apart from the civil law tradition and the universal constitutional principles; I have not yet encountered the Hungarian “Lorenz von Stein” or “Hermann Roesler”. * This study was generously sponsored by the Japan Foundation Short-Term Fellowship Program, July-August, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Is an Imposed Constitution Legitimate?
    LEGITIMACY OF THE CONSTITUTION OF JAPAN : REDUX Is an imposed constitution legitimate? Keigo Komamura Professor of Law, the Faculty of Law, Keio University (Tokyo) Member of the Advisory Council for Constitutional Revision Research Project, Reischauer Institute of Japanese Studies, 2010--, Harvard University Visiting Scholar, Reischauer Institute of Japanese Studies, 2009, Harvard University Academic Associate, the Program on U.S.-Japan Relations 2009-2010, Harvard University This research paper is based on an occasional paper that I submitted to the Program on U.S.- Japan Relations, Harvard University, 2010. After adding some adjustments, using the paper, I made a presentation at the regular meeting of Constitutional Revision Research Project, Reischauer Institute of Japanese Studies, Harvard University on Feb. 11th, 2010. 1 Table of Contents Introduction ----Main Arguments of This Paper I. A Note on “Legitimacy” A. Continuity in Regime as a Concept of Legitimacy B. Approach in This Paper II. A Brief Story of How the Postwar Constitution of Japan was Created III. Who made the Constitution of Japan? : Three Points of View IV. The August Revolution Theory and its Implications A. Continuity and Discontinuity B. What is the August Revolution Theory? C. Interpreting the Declaration as a Legal Authority V. From August Revolution to February Revolution A. Reaction of the Japanese government B. Two Interpretations of the Potsdam Declaration: Matsumoto vs. Nomura C. February Revolution? D. Some Legal Issues concerning the February Revolution: The February coup d'État as well? Tentative Conclusion ----Constitutional Commitments as a Dynamic Legitimacy Appendix 1 Appendix 2 Appendix 3 References 2 Introduction ----Main Arguments of This Paper During my stay at Princeton University as a visiting fellow 2008-09, an American student who studied Japanese politics asked me the following question: “The Japanese People have discussed revision of their postwar constitution many times.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hukou System As China's Main Regulatory Framework For
    DIE ERDE 143 2012 (3) Thematic Issue: Multilocality pp. 233-247 • Hukou system – Temporary rural-urban migration – China Jijiao Zhang The Hukou System as China’s Main Regulatory Framework for Temporary Rural-Urban Migration and its Recent Changes Das Hukou-System als Chinas wichtigstes Steuerungsinstrument der temporären Land-Stadt-Migration und seine jüngeren Wandlungen With 1 Table More than 50 years ago China’s government established the hukou system in order to prevent rural urban migration, requiring people to stay in the area where they were registered. Migrating to the city without being registered as ‘urban’ implied that the migrants had no access to education, food, housing, employment and a variety of other social services. In 1982, when unskilled labour was in short supply in the booming cities, a programme of gradual reform was started which eased the strict regulations. However, the level of liberalisation varied from one province to another and from one metropolis to the other, creating remarkable differences in the regulatory framework. The paper describes the history of the hukou system and its consequences as well as its reforms from the early beginnings to the present day and discusses the need for further reform. 1. Background operates like a boundary between rural area and urban area and divides the population into rural In most developing nations, economic devel- households and non-rural households (two- opment has promoted massive and uncon- tiered boundaries of belonging); individual inter- trolled migration from the countryside into ests and rights, such as education, healthcare, urban areas (Kasarda and Crenshaw 1991). housing and employment, are linked to the Rural-urban migration is a pervasive feature in household registration.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Driver License Manual and CUSTOMER SERVICE GUIDE
    Arizona Driver License Manual and CUSTOMER SERVICE GUIDE azdot.gov/mvd Douglas A. Ducey, Governor John S. Halikowski, Director Eric R. Jorgensen, Division Director Dear Arizona motorists: The Arizona Department of Transportation Motor Vehicle Division (ADOT MVD) is pleased to provide this guide to Arizona traffic laws and information for obtaining a driver license or identification card. This manual also provides essential safety information for both new and experienced Arizona drivers. ADOT MVD delivers services to millions of Arizona motorists each year. In line with the Division’s vision of getting Arizona “out of the line and safely on the road” we are continuously improving processes to provide swift and efficient service. In addition to coming into an office, ADOT MVD offers alternative methods for Arizonans to access services. For example, two thirds of all transactions, including common ones like registration renewals, sold notices, title transfers, ordering a replacement license, updating insurance information, ordering a motor vehicle record, and more can be done online at AZMVDNow.gov. We also encourage Arizona drivers to take advantage of the more than 160 privately operated Authorized Third Party locations to serve you across the state. Several of these locations offer both Title and Registration and driver license transactions! Find a location convenient for you atazdot.gov/mvdlocations . We look forward to providing you with outstanding customer service and a safe driving experience while we continue our mission of “moving Arizona’s citizens, economy and infrastructure by getting safe drivers and vehicles on the road.” Sincerely, Eric R. Jorgensen Director Motor Vehicle Division ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1801 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace in East Asia and the Japanese Constitution: a Reexamination 60 Years After Its Making1)
    Article Peace in East Asia and the Japanese Constitution: A Reexamination 60 Years After Its Making1) Akihiko Kimijima The purpose of this article is to review the 60-year history of the 1946 Constitution of Japan in the context of postwar East Asia. If one draws a schematic picture of the Japanese constitution in postwar East Asia, it could be described as the product of the dynamics generated by three elements: (1) the United States, which has defined the postwar world order, i.e., Pax Americana, (2) Japan’s conservative camp, which was integrated into Pax Americana while secretly preserving the continuity of the Japanese Empire, and (3) the Japanese people, who “embraced” the new constitution as their own.2) Soon after World War II the United States changed its policy from disarming to rearming Japan and has ceaselessly asked Japan to play a military role that supports and complements the US military. Japan’s conservatives have consistently developed foreign and security policies based on the US-Japan alliance. On many occasions the Japanese people have opposed the policies of the US and of Japan’s conservatives, relying on the pacifist principles of the postwar constitution. The US and Japanese conservatives have been trying to change Japan’s constitutional pacifism in the past 60 years and have renewed their efforts in recent years. I will attempt to reposition Japan’s constitutional pacifism in the context of East Asia and reconfirm its significance under these circumstances. I. Making of the Japanese Constitution 1. Pax Americana and Postwar East Asia The world order in the past 60 years can be summed up in the single term “Pax Americana.” The United States has been the greatest power, or the hegemon, in creating the world order since World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Reporting Standard
    COMMON REPORTING STANDARD TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS LEAFLET Version updated as of October 31th, 2019 Disclaimer: The present informative document, subject to modification, is communicated for information purposes only and has no contractual value. This document is defined based on the information provided by the OECD portal. It contains information that it is the sole responsibility of each country and is (i) of a general nature only and not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual or entity, (ii) not necessarily comprehensive, complete, accurate or up to date,(iii) sometimes linked to external sites over which SG Group has no control and for which SG Group assumes no responsibility and (iv) not professional or legal advice. If you need specific advice, you should always consult a professional tax advisor. TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS This document provides an overview of domestic rules in the countries listed below governing the issuance, structure, use and validity of Tax Identification Numbers (“TIN”) or their functional equivalents. It is split into two sections: Countries that have already published the information on the OECD portal and can 1 be accessed by clicking on the name of the country below Cook Andorra Hungary Malaysia Saudi Arabia Islands Argentina Costa Rica Iceland Malta Seychelles Marshall Aruba Croatia India Islands Singapore Australia Curacao Indonesia Mauritius Slovak Republic Ireland Austria Mexico Cyprus Slovenia Isle of Man Azerbaijan Czech Montserrat Republic South Africa Bahrain
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Japan Through the Koseki 自己と他者の配置−−戸籍を通して日本を見る
    Volume 9 | Issue 29 | Number 2 | Article ID 3565 | Jul 19, 2011 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Geographies of Self and Other: Mapping Japan through the Koseki 自己と他者の配置−−戸籍を通して日本を見る David Chapman Geographies of Self and Other: population documentation (hukou)3 in China has Mapping Japan through the Koseki been based on the household as the fundamental social unit. As part of the Taika David Chapman reforms in the seventh century, along with many other governmental structures adopted Abstract: from China, Japan employed the same system of household registration koseki( seido) to This paper traces the social history of the enhance and centralise the powers of the household registration system (koseki seido) in Yamato imperial court. Once the inhabitants of Japan from its beginning to the present day. The the Yamato-controlled territories were identified paper argues that thekoseki has been an they could be conscripted, taxed and controlled. essential tool of social control used at various Population registration has been practised in stages in history to facilitate the political needs Japan ever since and although it has undergone and priorities of the ruling elite by constructing numerous changes and, in recent times, been and policing the boundaries of Japanese self. supplemented by other legislation, thekoseki This self has been mediated through the has endured the course of Japanese history principles of family as defined by the state and through to the present day and still maintains has created diverse marginalised and excluded primacy in identifying who has legal Japanese others. The study includes social unrest and status. agency of these others in furthering understanding of the role of thekoseki in In this paper I trace the social history of Japanese society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nexus Between Civil Registration and Social Protection Systems: Five Country Practices
    CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE LE CENTRE D’EXCELLENCE for CRVS Systems sur les systèmes ESEC The Nexus Between Civil Registration and Social Protection Systems: Five Country Practices SOUTH KOREA TUNISIA NAMIBIA CHILE ARGENTINA Published by the Centre of Excellence for Civil Registration and Vital Statistics Systems. PO Box 8500, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1G 3H9 [email protected] www.CRVSsystems.ca © International Development Research Centre 2020 The research presented in this publication was carried out with fnancial and technical assistance from the Centre of Excellence for CRVS Systems. Housed at the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), it is jointly funded by Global Afairs Canada and IDRC. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of Global Afairs Canada, IDRC, or its Board of Governors. Suggested citation: Centre of Excellence for Civil Registration and Vital Statistics (CRVS) Systems. 2020. The Nexus Between Civil Registration and Social Protection Systems: Five Country Practices. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, ON. An electronic version of this compendium is available at CRVSsystems.ca/SocialProtection Contents i Contents Acknowledgements .........................................................................ii Foreword ...................................................................................iii Introduction .................................................................................1 Argentina ..................................................................................13 Chile
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Timeline of Japanese Government Citizen Registration Systems
    An Annotated Timeline of Japanese Government Citizen Registration Systems Prof. A. A. Adams Centre for Business Information Ethics APSN 3rd International Conference Hong Kong, 8–9 July 2013 Joint work with K. Murata, G. Greenleaf, T. Natsui and Y. Orito Overview • Motivation Centre for • Deep History Business Information Ethics • Modern, Industrial, Colonial • Militarism, Colonialism, War • Occupation and Modernisation • Recent History • Current Developments 1 Motivation • Japan’s limited DP laws (the APPIs) were heavily influenced by the development of Jukinet Centre for Business Information • State surveillance is heavily linkedEthics with government ID schemes • Cards are the tip of the iceberg: the databases are the big issue • Japan’s current scheme is divisive, discriminatory, controlling • Rapid (for Japan) transformations since 1990; including 2013/14 • Historic Institutions underpin modern systems • Dates are AD (apologies for the cultural imperialism) 2 Deep History • 670: Emperor Tenji imports the 戸籍 (CN: hukou; JP: koseki) household registration system from China • 700–1600: Various land registry systems link to the koseki and Centre for regular censuses, also used to determineBusiness Information tax requirements Ethics • 1614: Early Tokugawa regime bans Christianity, involves Buddhist temples in religious surveillance • 1638: Christianity punishable by death; 寺受け制度/teraukeseido/temple registration certificate introduced • Shinto religion modestly discouraged as it entails Imperial au- thority • Buddhism becomes part of central
    [Show full text]