DOCSLIB.ORG

Ed Recommendation-Amend

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ed Recommendation-Amend Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria, to the Heritage Council of Victoria Name: Stonington Address: 336 Glenferrie Road, 3-5 Somers Avenue and 7 Somers Avenue, Malvern Local Government Authority: City of Stonnington Executive Director recommendation I recommend to the Heritage Council of Victoria that the existing registration of VHR H1608, Stonington, at 336 Glenferrie Road, 3-5 Somers Avenue and 7 Somers Avenue, Malvern in the Victorian Heritage Register (‘VHR’) be amended under section 62 of the Heritage Act 2017 (‘the Act’). STEVEN AVERY Executive Director, Heritage Victoria DATE OF RECOMMENDATION: 20 May 2021 OFFICIAL Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria, to the Heritage Council of Victoria Executive Director Recommendation to the Heritage Council of Victoria The Executive Director, Heritage Victoria (‘Executive Director’), recommends that the Heritage Council amends the existing registration of VHR H1608, Stonington, at 336 Glenferrie Road, 3-5 Somers Avenue and 7 Somers Avenue, Malvern in the VHR by: • Including additional land • Determining categories of works or activities which may be carried out in relation to the place for which a permit is not required (permit exemptions) • Adding objects integral to a registered place • Changing the heritage category from ‘Registered place’ to ‘Registered place’ and ‘Registered object integral to a registered place’. Stonington 2 VHR number: VHR H1608 Hermes No: 679 Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria, to the Heritage Council of Victoria The process from here 1. The Heritage Council publishes the Executive Director’s recommendation (section 41). The Heritage Council will publish the Executive Director’s recommendation on its website for a period of 60 days. Submissions must be received by Heritage Council on or before 19 July 2021. 2. Making a submission to the Heritage Council (sections 44 and 45) Within the 60-day publication period, any person or body with a real and substantial interest in the place or object can make a submission to the Heritage Council. This submission can support the recommendation, or object to the recommendation and a hearing can be requested in relation to the submission. Information about making a submission and submission forms are available on the Heritage Council’s website: https://heritagecouncil.vic.gov.au/registrations-reviews/executive-director-recommendations/ 3. Heritage Council determination (sections 46 and 49) The Heritage Council is an independent statutory body. It is responsible for making the final determination to include or not include the place or object in the VHR, or amend a place or object already in the VHR. If no submissions are received the Heritage Council must make a determination within 40 days of the publication closing date. If submissions are received, the Heritage Council may decide to hold a hearing in relation to the submission. If a hearing does take place, the Heritage Council must make a determination within 90 days after the completion of the hearing. 4. Obligations of owners of places and objects (sections 42 and 43) The owner of a place or object which is the subject of a recommendation to the Heritage Council has certain obligations under the Act. These relate to advising the Executive Director in writing of any works or activities that are being carried out, proposed or planned for the place. The owner also has an obligation to provide a copy of this statement of recommendation to any potential purchasers of the place or object before entering into a contract. 5. Further information The relevant sections of the Act are provided at Appendix 1. Stonington 3 VHR number: VHR H1608 Hermes No: 679 Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria, to the Heritage Council of Victoria Description The following is a description of Stonington at the time of the site inspection by Heritage Victoria in May 2021. Stonington is a Boom-style mansion with associated buildings and landscape features located in the Melbourne suburb of Malvern. Stonington is situated on the eastern side of Glenferrie Road on a site that slopes steeply towards the Gardiners Creek valley, providing the site with views across to the Dandenong Ranges. The Glenferrie Road frontage is fenced with iron palisades set on a brick base. An elaborate gatehouse and gates define the main entrance to the mansion. The gatehouse is a single-storey stuccoed brick building with features including a curved projecting bay to the north and decorative pediment and pilasters to the Glenferrie Road elevation. The main driveway curves through landscaped grounds which feature broad areas of lawn and a range of mature tree specimens. A new three-storey freestanding residence lies to the east of the driveway. The driveway terminates at the prominent porte cochere of the mansion which is situated on a levelled section at the centre of the site. Designed in a late Boom-style, the mansion is a large two-storey brick and stucco building that demonstrates an eclectic range of late-Victorian stylistic influences including Germanic overtones, steep French Second Empire roof forms and Baroque detailing. It has an asymmetrical composition with colonnaded verandahs and balconies along the west, north and east elevations. Verandahs, balconies and the main entrance feature mosaic tiling. To the south, the mansion has an adjoining two-storey servants and service wing which adds to the bulk of the building. Internally, the formal entrance opens onto a large double height hall. Formal rooms including the Drawing Room, Dining Room and Library which are arranged around the hall. These spaces are embellished with elaborately carved timber joinery, highly detailed parquetry and fine plaster work. Early decorative schemes likely remain below the later overpainting. The Dining Room contains a red-marble topped side table and a large sideboard that have a historic association with the mansion. A lavatory, with historic WC pan, mosaic floor, stained glass and timber lining is situated beneath the elaborately carved main stair. Two large stained glass windows designed by Lyon, Cottier and Wells frame the landing of the main staircase. On the first floor, principal bedrooms open onto the Gallery which contains a large and highly detailed stained glass lantern and decorative coved ceiling. Further stained glass windows are found in the main bedrooms, some of which also contain elaborate timber fireplaces and door surrounds. Secondary bedrooms and a modern bathroom are clustered around the servants stairs to the south end of the building. On the ground level, the southern end of the building contains both a modern commercial and domestic kitchen as well as a bathroom. A basement can be accessed internally from the south end of the building. A large original stables building is located to the south of the mansion. It is U-shaped in plan with wings facing on to a paved courtyard accessed via a gated arched entrance. It is a brick structure with stuccoed walls on a bluestone plinth. The east wing is single-storey and likely served as the coach house while the double-storey south wing likely provided accommodation. A swimming pool and cabana have been added to the stable grounds in recent years. Stonington 4 VHR number: VHR H1608 Hermes No: 679 Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria, to the Heritage Council of Victoria 2021, Glenferrie Road frontage of Stonington. 2021, gatehouse and ornamental gate. 2021, grounds of Stonington 2021, Stonington and neighbouring residence, still under construction Stonington 5 VHR number: VHR H1608 Hermes No: 679 Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria, to the Heritage Council of Victoria 2021, north elevation of Stonington mansion 2018, entrance and hall of Stonington mansion Source: realestate.com 2018, main stair with stained glass windows in background 2018, Drawing room Source: realestate.com Source: realestate.com Stonington 6 VHR number: VHR H1608 Hermes No: 679 Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria, to the Heritage Council of Victoria 2021, gallery and coved ceiling with lantern 2021, mosaic to entrance porch Source: advisor.travel 2021, gated entry to stables courtyard 2021, view of stables from Somers Avenue Stonington 7 VHR number: VHR H1608 Hermes No: 679 Statement of recommendation from the Executive Director, Heritage Victoria, to the Heritage Council of Victoria History John Wagner and the establishment of Stonington The land on which Stonington is located was purchased by Cobb and Co coachline proprietor John Wagner in 1888. Wagner was a prominent Melbourne businessman with economic interests including real estate and mining. He was a founding partner of the Victorian branch of Cobb and Co which virtually monopolised the coach and mail business in northern and central Victoria in the latter part of the nineteenth century. Wagner purchased additional parcels of land to the south of the main allotment in 1890 and commenced development of his estate. Wagner named the estate Stonington after the town in Connecticut – his wife’s birthplace (the name of the place has also been spelt ‘Stonnington’ at times in its history). The mansion, stables and gatehouse were built to the designs of noted Melbourne architect, Charles D'Ebro and constructed by Stephen Armstrong, who was also responsible for the Cliveden mansion, East Melbourne. The original decorative scheme and the stained glass were designed by the firm Lyon Cottier and Wells, who undertook work in both Melbourne and Sydney. D’Ebro was well known for his involvement in large commercial and engineering projects, including the Princes Bridge (VHR H1447), and he employed unconventional engineering solutions in his design of Stonington. These included the use of metal beams in the sub-floor structure for the large floor spans of the hall and drawing room, concrete barrel vaults to support the verandahs, and trussed frame hanging beams for the large ceiling spans over two first floor bedrooms, which have marks indicating off-site cutting for on-site assembly.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Heritage Citation
    GJM Heritage Heritage Citation ‘CLANGILLIAN’ Address: 1334 High Street, Malvern Prepared by: GJM Heritage/Purcell Date: June 2017 (updated 31 July 2018) Place type: Residential Architect: Not known Grading: Locally significant Builder: Alfred Angel Integrity: Very High Construction Date: 1902 Recommendation: Include in the Heritage Overlay Extent of Overlay: To property title boundary Figure 1. 1334 High Street, Malvern (GJM Heritage/Purcell, June 2016) 1 GJM Heritage Statement of Significance What is significant? The Federation house known as Clangillian, 1334 High Street, Malvern, a single-storey dwelling built in 1902. Elements that contribute to the significance of the place include (but are not limited to): • The house’s original external form, materials and detailing • The house’s high level of integrity to its original design. Later alterations and additions, such as the rear carport, are not significant. How is it significant? Clangillian, 1334 High Street, Malvern, is of local architectural and aesthetic significance to the City of Stonnington. Why is it significant? Clangillian, 1334 High Street, Malvern, is a fine and highly intact example of a Federation house. The house strongly reflects the Federation Queen Anne architectural style popular in the first decade of the twentieth century in Malvern and across Melbourne more broadly. The asymmetrical composition, with complex roof forms, multiple gabled bays and integrated polygonal bay, along with architectural elements and materials, such as tall chimneys, and decorative coloured glass, are typical of the style. The use of quality materials and elaborate detailing imparts a sense of grandeur and demonstrates the status of the owner in wealthy established areas such as Malvern in the early twentieth century (Criterion D).
    [Show full text]
  • Stonnington Planning Scheme Municipal Strategic Statement
    STONNINGTON PLANNING SCHEME 21.09 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 02/07/2015 C186 The following strategic studies have informed the preparation of this planning scheme. All relevant material has been included in the planning scheme and decisions-makers should use these documents for background research only. Material in these documents that potentially provides guidance on decision-making but is not specifically referenced in the planning scheme has a limited role in decision-making. General City of Stonnington Council Plan City of Stonnington Municipal Public Health Plan City of Stonnington Planning Scheme Review, Final Review Report, June 2010 Inner Melbourne Action Plan (IMAP), 2005 (and subsequent adopted actions and policies) Economic development Arts and Cultural Strategy, City of Stonnington, 2011-2015 Building Prosperity, Economic Development Strategy 2012-2016, City of Stonnington, 2012 Chapel Vision Structure Plan 2007- 2031, City of Stonnington, December 2007 Commercial Strategy, Stonnington City Council, 1999 Design Guidelines for Licensed Venues, Department of Justice, 2009 Forrest Hill Structure Plan; Stonnington City Council, 2005 Late Night Liquor Licence Trading in the Chapel Street Precinct: Measuring the Saturation Levels Research Paper, April 2010 Toorak Village Activity Centre Design Guidelines, Stonnington City Council, 2010 Toorak Village Structure Plan, Stonnington City Council, 2008 Waverley Road Urban Design Framework Plan, Planisphere, 2008 Housing City of Stonnington, Population Profile and Projections, .id. Built environment
    [Show full text]
  • Brass Bands of the World a Historical Directory
    Brass Bands of the World a historical directory Kurow Haka Brass Band, New Zealand, 1901 Gavin Holman January 2019 Introduction Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 6 Angola................................................................................................................................ 12 Australia – Australian Capital Territory ......................................................................... 13 Australia – New South Wales .......................................................................................... 14 Australia – Northern Territory ....................................................................................... 42 Australia – Queensland ................................................................................................... 43 Australia – South Australia ............................................................................................. 58 Australia – Tasmania ....................................................................................................... 68 Australia – Victoria .......................................................................................................... 73 Australia – Western Australia ....................................................................................... 101 Australia – other ............................................................................................................. 105 Austria ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City of Port Phillip Heritage Review
    City of Port Phillip Heritage Review Place name: B.A.L.M. Paints Factory Citation No: Administration Building 8 (former) Other names: - Address: 2 Salmon Street, Port Heritage Precinct: None Melbourne Heritage Overlay: HO282 Category: Factory Graded as: Significant Style: Interwar Modernist Victorian Heritage Register: No Constructed: 1937 Designer: Unknown Amendment: C29, C161 Comment: Revised citation Significance What is significant? The former B.A.L.M. Paints factory administration building, to the extent of the building as constructed in 1937 at 2 Salmon Street, Port Melbourne, is significant. This is in the European Modernist manner having a plain stuccoed and brick façade with fluted Art Deco parapet treatment and projecting hood to the windows emphasising the horizontality of the composition. There is a tower towards the west end with a flag pole mounted on a tiered base in the Streamlined Moderne mode and porthole motif constituting the key stylistic elements. The brickwork between the windows is extended vertically through the cement window hood in ornamental terminations. Non-original alterations and additions to the building are not significant. How is it significant? The former B.A.L.M. Paints factory administration building at 2 Salmon Street, Port Melbourne is of local historic, architectural and aesthetic significance to the City of Port Phillip. City of Port Phillip Heritage Review Citation No: 8 Why is it significant? It is historically important (Criterion A) as evidence of the importance of the locality as part of Melbourne's inner industrial hub during the inter-war period, also recalling the presence of other paint manufacturers at Port Melbourne including Glazebrooks, also in Williamstown Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria
    SURVEY OF POST-WAR BUILT HERITAGE IN VICTORIA STAGE TWO: Assessment of Community & Administrative Facilities Funeral Parlours, Kindergartens, Exhibition Building, Masonic Centre, Municipal Libraries and Council Offices prepared for HERITAGE VICTORIA 31 May 2010 P O B o x 8 0 1 9 C r o y d o n 3 1 3 6 w w w . b u i l t h e r i t a g e . c o m . a u p h o n e 9 0 1 8 9 3 1 1 group CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background 7 1.2 Project Methodology 8 1.3 Study Team 10 1.4 Acknowledgements 10 2.0 HISTORICAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONTEXTS 2.1 Funeral Parlours 11 2.2 Kindergartens 15 2.3 Municipal Libraries 19 2.4 Council Offices 22 3.0 INDIVIDUAL CITATIONS 001 Cemetery & Burial Sites 008 Morgue/Mortuary 27 002 Community Facilities 010 Childcare Facility 35 015 Exhibition Building 55 021 Masonic Hall 59 026 Library 63 769 Hall – Club/Social 83 008 Administration 164 Council Chambers 85 APPENDIX Biographical Data on Architects & Firms 131 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O 3 4 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O group EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this survey was to consider 27 places previously identified in the Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria, completed by Heritage Alliance in 2008, and to undertake further research, fieldwork and assessment to establish which of these places were worthy of inclusion on the Victorian Heritage Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Rod Blackmore's
    Rod Blackmore’s AUSTRALASIAN THEATRE ORGANS Victoria section Best known location: Malvern Town Hall (Melbourne) Compton theatre organ 3 manuals, 17 ranks Console came from organ originally in Astoria theatre, Old Kent Road, London, England. Pipework is of mixed origins. Malvern is a suburb 7.5km southeast of the Melbourne CBD. The impressive Town Hall on the corner of High Street and Glenferrie Road is a jewel in the crown of the local government area known as the City of Stonnington, and the building is also known as the Stonnington City Centre. It was built in 1885-6, late Victorian and Italianate in style. The clock tower was added in 1890, and council chambers and a portico in Glenferrie Road were added in 1927. It is regarded as being aesthetically and historically significant in heritage terms. The main auditorium (or ballroom) has a vaulted ceiling and pendant lighting; there is a rear gallery. Seating capacity is about 600. In 1994 the City of Malvern and most of the City of Prahran were amalgamated to become the City of Stonnington. The 3 manuals 17 ranks Compton organ now installed in the Malvern Town Hall is owned by the Theatre Organ Society of Australia (Victoria division). Members David Cross and Norm McClure had purchased a 3 manual Compton console that had been one of twin consoles at the Astoria theatre, Old Kent Road, London, England, together with 5 ranks of pipes; these had been further acquired by Frank Douglas, and imported by him. In July 1969 TOSA decided to purchase these from Douglas.
    [Show full text]
  • SCG Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation
    Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation September 2019 spence-consulting.com Spence Consulting 2 Analysis of Victorian Councils Post Amalgamation Analysis by Gavin Mahoney, September 2019 It’s been over 20 years since the historic Victorian Council amalgamations that saw the sacking of 1600 elected Councillors, the elimination of 210 Councils and the creation of 78 new Councils through an amalgamation process with each new entity being governed by State appointed Commissioners. The Borough of Queenscliffe went through the process unchanged and the Rural City of Benalla and the Shire of Mansfield after initially being amalgamated into the Shire of Delatite came into existence in 2002. A new City of Sunbury was proposed to be created from part of the City of Hume after the 2016 Council elections, but this was abandoned by the Victorian Government in October 2015. The amalgamation process and in particular the sacking of a democratically elected Council was referred to by some as revolutionary whilst regarded as a massacre by others. On the sacking of the Melbourne City Council, Cr Tim Costello, Mayor of St Kilda in 1993 said “ I personally think it’s a drastic and savage thing to sack a democratically elected Council. Before any such move is undertaken, there should be questions asked of what the real point of sacking them is”. Whilst Cr Liana Thompson Mayor of Port Melbourne at the time logically observed that “As an immutable principle, local government should be democratic like other forms of government and, therefore the State Government should not be able to dismiss any local Council without a ratepayers’ referendum.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria Grants Commission Annual Report 1980
    VICTORIA GRANTS COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 1980 1980 VICTORIA GRANTS COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 1980 Ordered by the Legislative Assembly to be printed By Authority: F. D. Atkinson, Government Printer No. 18 Melbourne VICTORIA GRANTS COMMISSION MEMBERS D. V. Moye B.Ec., H.D.A. (Hons), Chairman F. S. Bales F.I.M.A., J.P. S. L. Cooper J.P. SECRETARY F. M. Thomas B.Ec. (Hons). VICTORIA GRANTS COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 1980 The Hon. Digby Crozier, M.L.C., Minister for Local Government, 480 Coiiins Street, MELBOURNE. V/C. 3000. As Members appointed under section 3 of the Victoria Grants Commission Act 1976, we have the honour to present the fourth Annual Report of the Victoria Grants Commission, in accordance with section 17 of that Act. D. V. MOYE, Chairman F. S. BALES, Member S. L. COOPER, Member F. M. THOMAS Secretary October, 1980. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 9 CHAPTER I. THE YEAR'S ACTIVITIES ...................................................... 11 Inspections ..................................................................... 11 Annual Return of Information. : . ............................................... 11 Comparisons between Years. ........ 12 Conference of State Grants Commissions ...................................... 13 2. THE BASES OF THE DETERMINATIONS ...................................... 14 As-of-Right Entitlement ....................................................... 14 Equalisation ................................................................... IS Revenue Raising Needs ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Iing Policies for the Melbourne Metropolitan Region Plan & Epa Library
    IING POLICIES FOR THE MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN REGION PLAN & EPA LIBRARY M0026673 MINISTRY FOR PLANNING AfJD ENVIRONMENT LIBRARY PLANNING POLICIES FOR THE MELBOURNE METROPOLITAN REGION NOVEMBER 1971 711.4099 731770 451 MEL:M Planning policies for the (1971) Melbourne metropolitan region MELBOURNE AND METROPOLITAN BOARD OF WORKS Chairman of the Board: A. H. Croxford, L.L.B. Honorary Commissioners (as at 14th September, 1971) R. Bassett, M.B.E., J.P. (City of Footscray) T. H. King (City of Malvern) A. E. Beckett, J.P. (City of Sandringham) G. F. Knowles, J.P. (Shire of Cranbourne) E. W. Best, C.M.G., J.P. (City of Melbourne) A. C. Laing, M.Sc, A.O.S.M. (City of Heidelberg) W. G. Boundy, J.P. (City of Camberwell) J. D. Langdon, J.P. (City of Richmond) G. R. Bricker, J.P. (City of Moorabbin) F. W. Le Page (City of Moorabbin) H. W. Cousins, I.S.M., J.P. (City of Essendon) E. O. Lundgren, J.P. (City of Box Hill) A. P. Donnelly, J.P. (City of Oakleigh) K. C. Marriott, J.P. (City of Springvale) G. C. Dreverman, J.P. (Shire of Eltham) L. W. Mason (City of Brighton) J. C. Duggan, J.P. (City of St. Kilda) V. R. Michael, J.P. (Shire of Whittlesea) D. W. Dumbrell (Shire of Bulla) K. E. Miller, J.P. (City of Dandenong) Sir Bernard Evans, Kt., D.S.O., E.D., F.R.A.I.A. (City of K. G. Mitchell (City of Broadmeadows) Melbourne) I. A. McNab (City of Keilor) M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Places We Keep: the Heritage Studies of Victoria and Outcomes for Urban Planners
    The places we keep: the heritage studies of Victoria and outcomes for urban planners Robyn Joy Clinch Submitted in total fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Architecture & Planning) June 2012 Faculty of Architecture, Building & Planning The University of Melbourne Abstract The incentive for this thesis that resulted from an investigation into the history of my heritage house, developed from my professional interest in the planning controls on heritage places. This was further motivated by my desire to reinvent my career as an urban planner and to use my professional experience in management, marketing and information technology. As a result, the aim of this thesis was to investigate the relationship between the development of the heritage studies of Victoria and the outcome of those documents on planning decisions made by urban planners. The methods used included a simulated experience that established a methodology for the thesis. In addition, interviews were conducted with experts in the field that provided a context for understanding the influencing factors of when, where, by whom, with what, why and how the studies were conducted. These interviews also contributed to the understanding of how the historical research had been undertaken and used to establish the significance of places and how this translated into outcomes for urban planners. Case studies in the form of Tribunal determinations have been used to illustrate key outcomes for urban planners. A large amount of information including that relating to the historical background of the studies plus a collection of indicative content from over 400 heritage studies was traversed.
    [Show full text]
  • National Trust of Australia (Victoria) Re: Submission to Draft Report On
    National Trust of Australia (Victoria) ABN 61 004 356 192 Patron in Chief Tasma Terrace John Landy AC MBE 4 Parliament Place Governor of Victoria East Melbourne Victoria 3002 Web: www.nattrust.com.au Email: [email protected] Heritage Inquiry T (03) 9656 9800 Productivity Commission F (03) 9650 5397 PO Box 80 BELCONNEN ACT 2616 15 February 2006 Re: Submission to draft report on Productivity Commission Inquiry into Conservation of Australia’s Heritage Places The National Trust of Australia (Victoria) has contributed to the preparation and submission, and is wholly supportive of, the Australian Council of National Trusts analysis of the draft report on behalf of the whole Trust movement. I believe that the credentials of the National Trust of Australia (Victoria) are well known to the Commission. The National Trust of Australia (Victoria) submits the following additional comments and examples relating primarily to the key recommendation made in the draft report. In the Trust’s experience the key draft recommendation 8.1, the requirement for a negotiated conservation agreement as a pre requisite to the granting of heritage listing, is fraught with problems. The National Trust of Australia (Victoria) has had statutory provision for 25 years under the Victoria Heritage Act 1995 to negotiate and manage such agreements. Our practical experience of such agreements offers insight into the problems and ongoing costs inherent in such a proposal. Examples from our files added as an appendix to this letter illustrate the extent of staff resources expended to maintain such agreements and give some indication as to what would be involved in the wider introduction of a negotiated scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • CY18-Faircloth Limit.Xlsx
    PHA Code PHA Name Faircloth Limit AK001 Alaska Housing Finance Corporation 1426 AL001 Housing Authority of the Birmingham District 6400 AL002 MOBILE HOUSING BOARD 3874 AL004 ANNISTON HA 748 AL005 PHENIX CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY 940 AL006 Housing Authority of the City of Montgomery 3036 AL007 Housing Authority of the City of Dothan 670 AL008 Selma Housing Authority 613 AL009 Housing Authority of the City of Attalla 110 AL010 Fairfield Housing Authority 302 AL011 Housing Authority of the City of Fort Payne 303 AL012 Housing Authority of the City of Jasper 418 AL013 Tarrant Housing Authority 97 AL014 The Guntersville Housing Authority 350 AL047 The Housing Authority of the City of Huntsville 1865 AL048 Housing Authority of the City of Decatur 776 AL049 Greater Gadsden 1042 AL050 HA AUBURN 18 AL051 Housing Authority of Red Bay 164 AL052 HA CULLMAN 326 AL053 Housing Authority of Hamilton, Alabama 491 AL054 FLORENCE H/A 172 AL055 HA CORDOVA 60 AL056 Haleyville Housing Authority 275 AL057 Sylacauga Housing Authority 626 AL058 Winfield Housing Authority 154 AL059 Housing Authority of the City of Tuscumbia 241 AL060 HA RUSSELLVILLE 209 AL061 HA OPELIKA 0 AL062 Housing Authority of the City of Lanett, AL 364 AL063 H A ONEONTA 180 AL064 Housing Authority of the City of Carbon Hill 110 AL065 Housing Authority of the City of Roanoke, AL 50 AL066 Housing Authority of Reform 60 AL067 Housing Authority of the City of Athens, Al 240 AL068 Sheffield Housing Authority 412 AL069 HA LEEDS 0 AL070 City of Union Springs Housing Authority 3 AL071 Housing Authority
    [Show full text]