DOCSLIB.ORG

The Action Plan for Threatened Australian Macropods 2011-2021 Action Plan for Threatened Macropods 2011-2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Action Plan for Threatened Australian Macropods 2011-2021 Action Plan for Threatened Macropods 2011-2021 The Action Plan for Threatened Australian Macropods 2011-2021 Action Plan for Threatened Macropods 2011-2021 Written and edited by Michael Roache. The author is grateful to the following individuals for their help and contributions during the preparation of this action plan: Liana Joseph for her extensive consultation on the project regarding prioritisation of threatened species recovery, and her input to some sections of the text. Katherine Miller of KSR Consulting who contributed substantially to the section on current issues in macropod conservation. Simone Albert who assisted with the compilation of recovery outlines. Lis McLellan, Tony Trujillo and Mina Bassarova for extensive review and comments on the draft manuscript. Finally, many experts provided comments on the manuscript and on the recovery outlines: Andrew Burbidge, Paul de Tores (Department of Environment and Conservation, WA), Michael Driessen (Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Tasmania), Tony Friend (Department of Environment and Conservation, WA), Matt Hayward (Australian Wildlife Conservancy), John Kanowski (Australian Wildlife Conservancy), Janelle Lowry (Department of Environment and Resource Management, QLD), Nicky Marlow, (Department of Environment and Conservation, WA), (Department of Environment and Resource Management, QLD), Manda Page (Australian Wildlife Conservancy), Barry Nolan (Department of Environment and Resource Management, QLD), David Pearson (Department of Environment and Conservation, WA), Jeff Short (Wildlife Research and Management Pty Ltd), Neil Thomas (Department of Environment and Conservation, WA), Threatened Species Section (Department of Environment and Resource Management, QLD), Adrian Wayne (Department of Environment and Conservation, WA). Distribution maps were prepared using Landsat 7 imagery (Geoscience Australia 2000). Published in August 2011 by WWF-Australia - World Wide Fund for Nature (formerly World Wildlife Fund) Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must mention the title and credit the above-mentioned publisher as the copyright owner. No photographs from this publication may be reproduced on the internet without prior authorization from WWF. © text 2011 WWF All rights reserved For further information on the WWF Threatened Macropod Program please see our website: http://www.wwf.org.au Or contact: Macropod Program WWF-Australia GPO Box 528 Sydney NSW 2001 Australia Cover image: Brush-tailed rock wallaby (Petrogale penicillata). © Ben Bishop/WWF-Australia Designed by Three Blocks Left For information on all of WWF’s flagship species conservation work, including threatened macropods, see: http://www.panda.org/species Action Plan for Threatened Macropods 2011-2021 CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUmmaRY 11 Introduction 11 Current Issues in Macropod Conservation 11 Status of Macropods 12 Action Plan Framework 12 Methods 12 Results 13 Conclusions 13 2. INTRODUctION 14 Lack of Resources 16 The Need for More Explicit Recovery Planning 16 3. CURRENT ISSUES IN THREatENED MacROPOD CONSERVatION 18 State of Macropods 18 Socio-Economic Context 18 Human Impacts 18 Conservation Funding 18 How Does Environment Rate as a Priority for Australians? 19 Perceptions of Macropods 19 Regulatory Context 20 Landscape-Scale Issues for Macropods 20 Land Clearing, Fragmentation and Degradation 20 Feral Animals 20 Predator and Competitor Control Strategies 22 Changed fire regimes 23 Climate change 23 Protected Areas 24 Species-Level Issues For Macropods 26 Genetics 26 Translocations and Reintroductions 26 Captive Breeding 26 Monitoring 26 4. ActION PLAN FRamEWORK 28 Action Plan Scope 28 Action Plan Vision 30 Action Plan Goal 30 Action Plan Objectives 30 3 Action Plan for Threatened Macropods 2011-2021 5. METHODS 31 Step 1: Define The Goal 32 Step 2: List Biodiversity Assets 32 Step 3: List Management Projects 32 Step 4: Provide Rationale for the Proposed Activities 33 Step 5: Estimate Cost 33 6. RESULTS 36 7. DISCUSSION 43 8. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDatIONS 46 Future Recommendations 47 Regular review 47 Confidence levels 47 More detailed expert input 47 9. REFERENCES 48 10. APPENDICES 50 Appendix 1: Acronyms 50 Appendix 2: List of Macropods 52 Appendix 3: Conservation Actions 54 Appendix 4: Yearly Costs 56 Appendix 5: Recovery Outlines 57 Recovery Outline – Bettongia gaimardi 57 Recovery Outline – Bettongia lesueur 61 Recovery Outline – Bettongia penicillata 72 Recovery Outline – Bettongia tropica 83 Recovery Outline – Dendrolagus bennettianus 93 Recovery Outline – Lagorchestes hirsutus 97 Recovery Outline – Lagostrophus fasciatus 106 Recovery Outline – Macropus bernardus 115 Recovery Outline – Macropus parma 119 Recovery Outline – Onychogalea fraenata 123 Recovery Outline – Petrogale burbidgei 130 Recovery Outline – Petrogale coenensis 135 Recovery Outline – Petrogale concinna 139 Recovery Outline – Petrogale lateralis 144 Recovery Outline – Petrogale penicillata 154 Recovery Outline – Petrogale persephone 164 Recovery Outline – Petrogale sharmani 174 Recovery Outline – Petrogale xanthopus 178 Recovery Outline – Potorous gilbertii 187 Recovery Outline – Potorous longipes 193 Recovery Outline – Setonix brachyurus 202 4 Action Plan for Threatened Macropods 2011-2021 LIST OF taBLES Table 1: List of changes in IUCN threat status for Australian macropods between 1996 and 2008. 15 Table 2: Australian macropods listed as threatened, near threatened or data deficient according 29 to the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species (IUCN, 2010). Table 3: Summary of the steps undertaken in collecting information for this action plan. 32 Table 4: Projects with dedicated recovery coordinator salary built in to project cost. 34 Table 5: List of threatened macropod recovery projects in order of their affordability. 37 Table 6: Average cost of down-listing by IUCN threat rating. 37 Table 7: Number of species projects that could be funded under nominal recovery budgets to 39 achieve down-listing on the IUCN Red List within 10 years if projects are prioritised based on cost. Table 8: Cost of all 21 macropod projects by category of management activity (Conservation 41 Measures Partnership 2011). For explanations of the categories, see Appendix 3. Table 9: Most costly category of management action by IUCN threat category, and the combined 41 costs of those actions. Table 10: Most costly category of management action for each species, showing percentage of total 42 project cost, and the relevant actions contributing to those costs. Table 11: List of recovery actions for Bettongia gaimardi, and the rationale for their contribution 59 to recovery, and effort required. Table 12: List of recovery actions for Bettongia gaimardi, and their costs. 60 Table 13: List of recovery actions for Bettongia lesueur, and the rationale for their contribution 64 to recovery, and effort required. Table 14: List of recovery actions for Bettongia lesueur, and their costs. 68 Table 15: List of recovery actions for Bettongia penicillata, and the rationale for their contribution 75 to recovery, and effort required. Table 16: List of recovery actions for Bettongia penicillata, and their costs. 79 Table 17: List of recovery actions for Bettongia tropica, and the rationale for their contribution 86 to recovery, and effort required. Table 18: List of recovery actions for Bettongia tropica, and their costs. 90 Table 19: List of recovery actions for Dendrolagus bennettianus, and the rationale for their 95 contribution to recovery, and effort required. Table 20: List of recovery actions for Dendrolagus bennettianus, and their costs. 96 Table 21: List of recovery actions for Lagorchestes hirsutus, and the rationale for their 100 contribution to recovery, and effort required. Table 22: List of recovery actions for Lagorchestes hirsutus, and their costs. 103 Table 23: List of recovery actions for Lagostrophus fasciatus, and the rationale for their 109 contribution to recovery, and effort required. Table 24: List of recovery actions Lagostrophus fasciatus, and their costs. 112 5 Action Plan for Threatened Macropods 2011-2021 Table 25: List of recovery actions for Macropus bernardus, and the rationale for their 117 contribution to recovery, and effort required. Table 26: List of recovery actions Macropus bernardus, and their costs. 118 Table 27: List of recovery actions for Macropus parma, and the rationale for their contribution 121 to recovery, and effort required. Table 28: List of recovery actions for Macropus parma, and their costs. 122 Table 29: List of recovery actions for Onychogalea fraenata, and the rationale for their 126 contribution to recovery, and effort required. Table 30: List of recovery actions for Onychogalea fraenata, and their costs. 128 Table 31: List of recovery actions for Petrogale burbidgei, and the rationale for their contribution 132 to recovery, and effort required. Table 32: List of recovery actions for Petrogale burbidgei, and their costs. 134 Table 33: List of recovery actions for Petrogale coenensis, and the rationale for their contribution 137 to recovery, and effort required. Table 34: List of recovery actions for Petrogale coenensis, and their costs. 138 Table 35: List of recovery actions Petrogale concinna, and the rationale for their contribution 141 to recovery, and effort required. Table 36: List of recovery actions for Petrogale concinna, and their costs. 143 Table 37: List of recovery actions Petrogale lateralis, and the rationale for their contribution 147 to recovery, and effort required. Table 38: List of recovery actions for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tree Kangaroo Conservation Program
    Empowered lives. Resilient nations. TREE KANGAROO CONSERVATION PROGRAM Papua New Guinea Equator Initiative Case Studies Local sustainable development solutions for people, nature, and resilient communities UNDP EQUATOR INITIATIVE CASE STUDY SERIES Local and indigenous communities across the world are advancing innovative sustainable development solutions that work for people and for nature. Few publications or case studies tell the full story of how such initiatives evolve, the breadth of their impacts, or how they change over time. Fewer still have undertaken to tell these stories with community practitioners themselves guiding the narrative. The Equator Initiative aims to fill that gap. The Equator Prize 2014 was awarded to 35 outstanding local community and indigenous peoples initiatives working to meet climate and development challenges through the conservation and sustainable use of nature. Selected from 1,234 nomination from across 121 countries, the winners were recognized for their achievements at a prize ceremony held in conjunction with the UN Secretary General’s Climate Summit and the World Conference on Indigenous Peoples in New York City. Special emphasis was placed on forest and ecosystem restoration, food security and agriculture, and water and ocean management. The following case study is one in a growing series that describes vetted and peer-reviewed best practices intended to inspire the policy dialogue needed to take local success to scale, to improve the global knowledge base on local environment and development solutions, and to serve as models for replication. Case studies are best viewed and understood with reference to The Power of Local Action: Lessons from 10 Years of the Equator Prize, a compendium of lessons learned and policy guidance that draws from the case material.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Matters: Winter 2016 1 Wildlife Matters
    Wildlife Matters: Winter 2016 1 wildlife matters Winter 2016 Historic partnership: AWC to reintroduce lost mammals to NSW national parks 2 Wildlife Matters: Winter 2016 Saving Australia’s threatened wildlife Welcome to the Winter 2016 edition of Wildlife Matters. The AWC mission This edition marks the beginning of a historic partnership between Australian The mission of Australian Wildlife Wildlife Conservancy (AWC) and the NSW Government. AWC has been contracted Conservancy (AWC) is the effective to deliver national park management services in the iconic Pilliga forest and at conservation of all Australian animal Mallee Cliffs National Park in the state’s south-west. It is the first public-private species and the habitats in which they live. collaboration of its kind. The centrepiece of this exciting partnership will be the reintroduction of at least 10 mammal species that are currently listed as extinct in To achieve this mission our actions are NSW. focused on: This is one of the world’s most significant biodiversity reconstruction projects. The • Establishing a network of sanctuaries return of mammals such as the Bilby and the Numbat – which disappeared from which protect threatened wildlife and NSW national parks more than 100 years ago – will represent a defining moment in ecosystems: AWC now manages our quest to halt and reverse the loss of Australia’s unique wildlife. 25 sanctuaries covering over 3.25 million hectares (8 million acres). The initiative reflects strong leadership by the NSW Government. It is committing substantial funds for threatened species, including this partnership with AWC. • Implementing practical, on-ground More importantly, the NSW Government recognises the need to develop new conservation programs to protect approaches to conservation if we are to reverse the catastrophic decline of the wildlife at our sanctuaries: these Australia’s natural capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Kangaroos Survive in the Wheatbelt?
    Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4 Volume 31 Number 1 1990 Article 4 1-1-1990 Can kangaroos survive in the wheatbelt? Graham Arnold Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4 Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Environmental Monitoring Commons, and the Other Animal Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Arnold, Graham (1990) "Can kangaroos survive in the wheatbelt?," Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4: Vol. 31 : No. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4/vol31/iss1/4 This article is brought to you for free and open access by Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Department of Agriculture, Western Australia, Series 4 by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Can kangaroos survive in the wheaibelt? mm mmmm By Graham Arnold, Senior Principal Research Scientist, CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, Helena Valley One of the costs of agricultural development in Western Australia over the past 100 years has been the loss of most of the native vegetation and, consequently, massive reductions in the numbers of most of our native fauna. Thirteen mammal species are extinct and many bird and mammal species are extinct in some areas. These losses will increase as remnant native vegetation degrades under the impact of nutrients washed and blown from farmland, from the invasion by Western grey kangaroo grazing weeds and from grazing sheep. on pasture in the early morning. Even kangaroos are affected.
    [Show full text]
  • Macropod Herpesviruses Dec 2013
    Herpesviruses and macropods Fact sheet Introductory statement Despite the widespread distribution of herpesviruses across a large range of macropod species there is a lack of detailed knowledge about these viruses and the effects they have on their hosts. While they have been associated with significant mortality events infections are usually benign, producing no or minimal clinical effects in their adapted hosts. With increasing emphasis being placed on captive breeding, reintroduction and translocation programs there is a greater likelihood that these viruses will be introduced into naïve macropod populations. The effects and implications of this type of viral movement are unclear. Aetiology Herpesviruses are enveloped DNA viruses that range in size from 120 to 250nm. The family Herpesviridae is divided into three subfamilies. Alphaherpesviruses have a moderately wide host range, rapid growth, lyse infected cells and have the capacity to establish latent infections primarily, but not exclusively, in nerve ganglia. Betaherpesviruses have a more restricted host range, a long replicative cycle, the capacity to cause infected cells to enlarge and the ability to form latent infections in secretory glands, lymphoreticular tissue, kidneys and other tissues. Gammaherpesviruses have a narrow host range, replicate in lymphoid cells, may induce neoplasia in infected cells and form latent infections in lymphoid tissue (Lachlan and Dubovi 2011, Roizman and Pellet 2001). There have been five herpesvirus species isolated from macropods, three alphaherpesviruses termed Macropodid Herpesvirus 1 (MaHV1), Macropodid Herpesvirus 2 (MaHV2), and Macropodid Herpesvirus 4 (MaHV4) and two gammaherpesviruses including Macropodid Herpesvirus 3 (MaHV3), and a currently unclassified novel gammaherpesvirus detected in swamp wallabies (Wallabia bicolor) (Callinan and Kefford 1981, Finnie et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Mammals of Indonesia
    CHECKLIST OF THE MAMMALS OF INDONESIA Scientific, English, Indonesia Name and Distribution Area Table in Indonesia Including CITES, IUCN and Indonesian Category for Conservation i ii CHECKLIST OF THE MAMMALS OF INDONESIA Scientific, English, Indonesia Name and Distribution Area Table in Indonesia Including CITES, IUCN and Indonesian Category for Conservation By Ibnu Maryanto Maharadatunkamsi Anang Setiawan Achmadi Sigit Wiantoro Eko Sulistyadi Masaaki Yoneda Agustinus Suyanto Jito Sugardjito RESEARCH CENTER FOR BIOLOGY INDONESIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCES (LIPI) iii © 2019 RESEARCH CENTER FOR BIOLOGY, INDONESIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCES (LIPI) Cataloging in Publication Data. CHECKLIST OF THE MAMMALS OF INDONESIA: Scientific, English, Indonesia Name and Distribution Area Table in Indonesia Including CITES, IUCN and Indonesian Category for Conservation/ Ibnu Maryanto, Maharadatunkamsi, Anang Setiawan Achmadi, Sigit Wiantoro, Eko Sulistyadi, Masaaki Yoneda, Agustinus Suyanto, & Jito Sugardjito. ix+ 66 pp; 21 x 29,7 cm ISBN: 978-979-579-108-9 1. Checklist of mammals 2. Indonesia Cover Desain : Eko Harsono Photo : I. Maryanto Third Edition : December 2019 Published by: RESEARCH CENTER FOR BIOLOGY, INDONESIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCES (LIPI). Jl Raya Jakarta-Bogor, Km 46, Cibinong, Bogor, Jawa Barat 16911 Telp: 021-87907604/87907636; Fax: 021-87907612 Email: [email protected] . iv PREFACE TO THIRD EDITION This book is a third edition of checklist of the Mammals of Indonesia. The new edition provides remarkable information in several ways compare to the first and second editions, the remarks column contain the abbreviation of the specific island distributions, synonym and specific location. Thus, in this edition we are also corrected the distribution of some species including some new additional species in accordance with the discovery of new species in Indonesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Platypus Collins, L.R
    AUSTRALIAN MAMMALS BIOLOGY AND CAPTIVE MANAGEMENT Stephen Jackson © CSIRO 2003 All rights reserved. Except under the conditions described in the Australian Copyright Act 1968 and subsequent amendments, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, duplicating or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Contact CSIRO PUBLISHING for all permission requests. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Jackson, Stephen M. Australian mammals: Biology and captive management Bibliography. ISBN 0 643 06635 7. 1. Mammals – Australia. 2. Captive mammals. I. Title. 599.0994 Available from CSIRO PUBLISHING 150 Oxford Street (PO Box 1139) Collingwood VIC 3066 Australia Telephone: +61 3 9662 7666 Local call: 1300 788 000 (Australia only) Fax: +61 3 9662 7555 Email: [email protected] Web site: www.publish.csiro.au Cover photos courtesy Stephen Jackson, Esther Beaton and Nick Alexander Set in Minion and Optima Cover and text design by James Kelly Typeset by Desktop Concepts Pty Ltd Printed in Australia by Ligare REFERENCES reserved. Chapter 1 – Platypus Collins, L.R. (1973) Monotremes and Marsupials: A Reference for Zoological Institutions. Smithsonian Institution Press, rights Austin, M.A. (1997) A Practical Guide to the Successful Washington. All Handrearing of Tasmanian Marsupials. Regal Publications, Collins, G.H., Whittington, R.J. & Canfield, P.J. (1986) Melbourne. Theileria ornithorhynchi Mackerras, 1959 in the platypus, 2003. Beaven, M. (1997) Hand rearing of a juvenile platypus. Ornithorhynchus anatinus (Shaw). Journal of Wildlife Proceedings of the ASZK/ARAZPA Conference. 16–20 March.
    [Show full text]
  • Feral Cats: Killing 75 Million Native Animals Every Night Saving Australia’S Threatened Wildlife
    wildlife matters Summer 2012/13 Feral cats: killing 75 million native animals every night Saving Australia’s threatened wildlife Welcome to the Summer 2012/13 edition of Wildlife Matters. The AWC mission As you will read in the following pages, our focus remains firmly on battling the The mission of Australian Wildlife “ecological axis of evil” – feral animals, wildfires and weeds. For decades, these Conservancy (AWC) is the effective forces have been steadily eroding Australia’s natural capital, causing the extinction conservation of all Australian animal of wildlife and the destruction of habitats and ecological processes. The role of feral species and the habitats in which they live. cats – which kill 75 million native animals every day – is particularly significant. To achieve this mission, our actions are focused on: Our response to this tripartite attack on Australia’s natural capital is straightforward • Establishing a network of sanctuaries – we deliver practical land management informed by world-class science. Central which protect threatened wildlife and to our strategy is the fact that around 80% of our staff are based in the field. AWC’s ecosystems: AWC now manages dedicated team of field operatives – land managers and ecologists – represent the 23 sanctuaries covering over 3 million front-line in our battle against fire, ferals and weeds. Within the conservation sector, hectares (7.4 million acres). we are unique in deploying such a high proportion of our staff in the field. • Implementing practical, on-ground To date, this strategy has delivered significant, measurable and very positive conservation programs to protect ecological returns. This success is particularly apparent when considering the the wildlife at our sanctuaries: these surviving populations of Australia’s most endangered mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mahogany Glider
    ISSUE #3 – WINTER 2019 THE MAHOGANY GLIDER The mahogany glider is one of Australia’s most threatened mammals and Queensland’s only listed endangered glider species. Named for its mahogany-brown belly, this graceful glider has two folds of skin, called a patagium, which stretch A mahogany glider, Petaurus gracilis, venturing out at the Hidden Vale Wildlife Centre. between the front and rear legs. These act as a ‘parachute’ enabling the animal to glide distances of and the Hidden Vale Wildlife Centre is manipulate their patagium in order to 30 metres in open woodland habitat. one of just a few locations authorised land safely. Their long tail is used for mid-air for breeding. Breeding is undertaken The Centre recently received funding stabilisation. as an insurance against extinction. to purchase additional structures The Centre regularly exchanges They look similar to sugar or squirrel including climbing ropes and nets, gliders with other authorised gliders, however mahogany gliders ladders and ‘unstable’ branches to locations to ensure genetic are much larger. They are nocturnal, simulate the movement of small trees. diversity in captive populations. elusive and silent, making research on We are also planning to introduce free-ranging animals very difficult. We encourage our mahogany gliders a range of glider-suitable feeding to develop and display their normal Mahogany gliders appear to be enrichment, such as whole fruits, range of behaviours. That is why we monogamous and will actively mark puzzle-feeders, or feed in a hanging have set up one half of their enclosure and defend their territory. They use log. We hope that our gliders will not with climbing structures in the form hollows in large eucalypt trees, lined only breed well, but will also become of ‘stable’ branches, while the right with a thick mat of leaves, as dens.
    [Show full text]
  • A Species-Level Phylogenetic Supertree of Marsupials
    J. Zool., Lond. (2004) 264, 11–31 C 2004 The Zoological Society of London Printed in the United Kingdom DOI:10.1017/S0952836904005539 A species-level phylogenetic supertree of marsupials Marcel Cardillo1,2*, Olaf R. P. Bininda-Emonds3, Elizabeth Boakes1,2 and Andy Purvis1 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot SL5 7PY, U.K. 2 Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London NW1 4RY, U.K. 3 Lehrstuhl fur¨ Tierzucht, Technical University of Munich, Alte Akademie 12, 85354 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany (Accepted 26 January 2004) Abstract Comparative studies require information on phylogenetic relationships, but complete species-level phylogenetic trees of large clades are difficult to produce. One solution is to combine algorithmically many small trees into a single, larger supertree. Here we present a virtually complete, species-level phylogeny of the marsupials (Mammalia: Metatheria), built by combining 158 phylogenetic estimates published since 1980, using matrix representation with parsimony. The supertree is well resolved overall (73.7%), although resolution varies across the tree, indicating variation both in the amount of phylogenetic information available for different taxa, and the degree of conflict among phylogenetic estimates. In particular, the supertree shows poor resolution within the American marsupial taxa, reflecting a relative lack of systematic effort compared to the Australasian taxa. There are also important differences in supertrees based on source phylogenies published before 1995 and those published more recently. The supertree can be viewed as a meta-analysis of marsupial phylogenetic studies, and should be useful as a framework for phylogenetically explicit comparative studies of marsupial evolution and ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Parasitology in Australia: Past, Present and Future
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Journal of Zoology, 2018, 66, 286–305 Review https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO19017 Wildlife parasitology in Australia: past, present and future David M. Spratt A,C and Ian Beveridge B AAustralian National Wildlife Collection, National Research Collections Australia, CSIRO, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. BVeterinary Clinical Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Vic. 3030, Australia. CCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Wildlife parasitology is a highly diverse area of research encompassing many fields including taxonomy, ecology, pathology and epidemiology, and with participants from extremely disparate scientific fields. In addition, the organisms studied are highly dissimilar, ranging from platyhelminths, nematodes and acanthocephalans to insects, arachnids, crustaceans and protists. This review of the parasites of wildlife in Australia highlights the advances made to date, focussing on the work, interests and major findings of researchers over the years and identifies current significant gaps that exist in our understanding. The review is divided into three sections covering protist, helminth and arthropod parasites. The challenge to document the diversity of parasites in Australia continues at a traditional level but the advent of molecular methods has heightened the significance of this issue. Modern methods are providing an avenue for major advances in documenting and restructuring the phylogeny of protistan parasites in particular, while facilitating the recognition of species complexes in helminth taxa previously defined by traditional morphological methods. The life cycles, ecology and general biology of most parasites of wildlife in Australia are extremely poorly understood. While the phylogenetic origins of the Australian vertebrate fauna are complex, so too are the likely origins of their parasites, which do not necessarily mirror those of their hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • Ba3444 MAMMAL BOOKLET FINAL.Indd
    Intot Obliv i The disappearing native mammals of northern Australia Compiled by James Fitzsimons Sarah Legge Barry Traill John Woinarski Into Oblivion? The disappearing native mammals of northern Australia 1 SUMMARY Since European settlement, the deepest loss of Australian biodiversity has been the spate of extinctions of endemic mammals. Historically, these losses occurred mostly in inland and in temperate parts of the country, and largely between 1890 and 1950. A new wave of extinctions is now threatening Australian mammals, this time in northern Australia. Many mammal species are in sharp decline across the north, even in extensive natural areas managed primarily for conservation. The main evidence of this decline comes consistently from two contrasting sources: robust scientifi c monitoring programs and more broad-scale Indigenous knowledge. The main drivers of the mammal decline in northern Australia include inappropriate fi re regimes (too much fi re) and predation by feral cats. Cane Toads are also implicated, particularly to the recent catastrophic decline of the Northern Quoll. Furthermore, some impacts are due to vegetation changes associated with the pastoral industry. Disease could also be a factor, but to date there is little evidence for or against it. Based on current trends, many native mammals will become extinct in northern Australia in the next 10-20 years, and even the largest and most iconic national parks in northern Australia will lose native mammal species. This problem needs to be solved. The fi rst step towards a solution is to recognise the problem, and this publication seeks to alert the Australian community and decision makers to this urgent issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Bara-Boodie.Pdf
    ENGAGE E EXPLOR Bara EXPLAIN Boodie, the burrowing bettong ELABORATE E EVALUAT By Alwyn Evans Illustrated by Paul Ricketts ENDICES P AP PAGE 7 PART 1: LEARNING THROUGH STORY / BARA BOODIE, THE BURROWING BETTONG ENGAGE EXPLORE EXPLAIN ELABORATE long, long time ago, boodies lived contentedly all over Australia, in all A sorts of places: from shady woodlands with grasses and shrubs, to wide sandy deserts. EVALUAT Actually my friend, they lived in almost any place they fancied. Bara Boodie and her family’s home was the Australian Western Desert, in E Martu people’s country. They lived in a large cosy nest under a quandong tree, with many friends and neighbours nearby. Actually my friend, boodies loved to make friends with everyone. AP P Bara Boodie, the burrowing bettong ENDICES PART 1: LEARNING THROUGH STORY / BARA BOODIE, THE BURROWING BETTONG PAGE 8 ENGAGE o make their nests snug, Bara’s dad, mum and aunties collected bundles T of spinifex and grasses. Scampering on all fours, they carried their bundles with their fat, prehensile tails, back to their nests. E Actually my friend, they used any soft EXPLOR things they found. As they were small animals, all the family fitted cosily into their nest. Bara was only about 28 centimetres long, and her two brothers weren’t much more. Her mother and aunties were shorter than her father who was 40 centimetres long. At night they slept, curled EXPLAIN up together, with their short-muzzled faces and small rounded ears tucked into their fur. Actually my friend, they looked like one great big, grey, furry ball.
    [Show full text]