The Pattington Chicago

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Pattington Chicago INTRODUCTION The Pattington residential campus in the Buena Park neighborhood of Chicago is a picturesque record of the City’s ideals at the beginning of the 20th century. This was a time when residents of the young and gritty city dreamed of gracious lives in homes of quiet dignity where they could relax in parklike surroundings, even as they lived in densely populated neighborhoods. For dignity, Chicagoans constructed residences with architectural styles drawn from classical antiquity and the renaissance. For relaxation, they developed green spaces of every size from window boxes to Lincoln Park, Chicago’s largest park. They also developed the courtyard apartment building, which combined these elements in a multi-family dwelling. This picture booklet highlights features of the Pattington that provide glimpses of these ideals when the Pattington was new. It examines the place of the Pattington in the construction of Chicago’s green spaces and in the development of the city’s residential architecture. 1 THE PATTINGTON The Pattington residences are composed of two apartment buildings. One is a building with two courtyards that face Irving Park Road to the south. This building, built in the years 1902-1904, was designed by architect David E. Postle for the original owner, James E. Patton, and constructed by Telford and McWade Builders. The American Institute of Architects has described it as “Chicago’s best courtyard building.” Architecture historian Carroll William Westfall has said it is the closing monument of a Chicago “classical style” of residential architecture that lasted from 1893 to 1904. 2 The second Pattington building faces Bittersweet Place to the north. This building, completed in 1906, was designed by architect Andrew Sandregen for the next owner, Edward Shellaberger. Westfall has noted that the Bittersweet building is the first example on Chicago’s north side of a Tudor apartment building, the next prominent Chicago residential style after the classical period. 3 THE ARCHITECTS David Postle, who designed the Pattington courtyard building, also designed many fine buildings in Elgin, Illinois, where he lived. These included: The Elgin Public Museum The Lords Park Pavilion 4 Postle designed this prairie-style duplex residence at 54-56 North Liberty Street, Elgin. He lived in the unit on the right. Postle designed more than 25 homes in Elgin. Postle moved to the Los Angeles area in 1921, where he continued to design fine residences. One was the Gunther House at 1960 Mendocino in Altadena, north of Pasadena. 5 Westfall has described Andrew Sandregen, who designed the Pattington Bittersweet building, as “one of the important apartment designers in Chicago.” Sandregen designed hundreds of multi-family dwellings in the Chicago area. His buildings include 813-819 West Buena Avenue Chicago 6 The Aztec Fullerton and Lincoln Park West, Chicago 1235 North Astor Street, Chicago 7 THE CITY AND THE GARDEN Like many courtyard buildings in Chicago, the Pattington reflects an affection for green spaces. This affection is displayed not only in the Pattington courtyards, but also in the small park to the side of the Bittersweet building, which residents have used as a garden as well as a park. Chicagoans have admired green spaces from the city’s beginning. Promptly after the city was incorporated in 1837, the city council decided to create a municipal seal that would symbolize the city’s present and future. Among other things, the Chicago seal contained the motto “Urbs in Horto,” Latin for “City in a Garden,” placed on a banner under a stack of wheat. The wheat can be seen more clearly in the 1905 version of the seal, on the right, than in the original version, on the left. In 1837, the only existing garden near Chicago was the unspoiled Eden of tallgrass prairie that extended west and south of the city. In the words of the 1909 Plan of Chicago, this “boundless prairie carpeted with waving grass bedecked with brilliant wild flowers” (the dark green area of the map) covered two thirds of Illinois, as well as great parts of other nearby states. 8 The city fathers knew that Chicago’s primary garden of the future would be great fields of wheat, growing on the rich soil of the tallgrass prairie. This soil would become the energy source for a blaze of human activity as Chicago grew from a town of 150 in 1833 to a city of more than 1 million in 1890, the second- largest city in the United States. Chicago’s business district became intensely busy, without any place to relax in natural surroundings. Downtown Chicago in 1893 Chicagoans, however, expressed the “city in a garden” ideal through a proliferation of window boxes, small parks and large parks, including eventually the 1200-acre Lincoln Park. According to architecture historian Daniel Bluestone, gardens and parks became a key part of constructing Chicago. 9 In the 1800s some Chicagoans sought refuge from the intensity of city life in visits to Lake View, a town north of Chicago. Bluestone has noted the importance of these visits to the formation of Chicago’s Buena Park neighborhood. The town of Lake View, outlined here in an 1862 map, extended along the shore of Lake Michigan from North Avenue to Devon Avenue in Chicago today. For property tax purposes, Pattington residents and their neighbors still hold real estate in the Township of Lake View. The spirit of Lake View residents was described in an 1876 article in the Chicago Daily Tribune: Residents are so contented in a state of simple existence that no exertions are made for the sake of society, and an outsider would call it quiet. But the people of this town don’t propose to get excited just for 10 the sake of show, and, knowing their own capabilities for enjoyment, are indulging in the dolce far niente [the sweetness of doing nothing]. Beginning in the 1850s, many prosperous Chicagoans began to visit a hotel in Lake View known as Lake View House. Lake View House This hotel was located on Grace Street a short distance from present-day Lake Shore Drive. Lake Michigan then lay where Lake Shore Drive now passes Grace Street. Walter L. Newberry, an early visitor to Lake View House, looked at the lake from the hotel’s front porch and suggested the hotel’s name. Newberry, for whom Chicago’s Newberry Library is named, was president of Chicago’s first railroad, the Galena & Chicago Union. Some prominent Chicagoans began to reside at Lake 11 View House from April to September every year, making the hotel a multi-family dwelling for the summer, a precursor to the Pattington and other later Chicago multi- family residences. In the 1850s, a leading early Chicago real estate agent and developer, Samuel H. Kerfoot, created a 10-acre private park near the lake on the north side of Graceland Avenue (now Irving Park Road). The 3-acre Pattington campus now lies in the area once occupied by Kerfoot Park. Kerfoot noted that his park was the first work of artistic landscape gardening in the Midwest and the most thoroughly landscaped park west of New York City until Lincoln Park was beautified. According to Bluestone, the park featured “an extensive carriage drive, shaded by planted evergreens, artificial ponds crossed by bridges, and rustic arbors, steps, and seats.” Kerfoot opened his park to the public in its early years, and it became a precursor to Lincoln Park. Kerfoot later obtained the first authorization from the Illinois legislature to establish Lincoln Park, and he eventually turned his private park into a personal residence. 12 Lake View House and Kerfoot Park were early examples of several Chicago getaway destinations that would grow into the Buena Park neighborhood. Other destinations included Graceland Cemetery Established in 1860, Graceland Cemetery became a popular place for visits by Chicagoans. They followed a practice of many Americans in the 1800s, before the creation of large public parks, to treat cemeteries as parkland. U.S. Marine Hospital Located on the grounds of today’s Walt Disney Magnet School, the U.S. Marine Hospital was built in 1873 to provide health care to the merchant marine of the Great Lakes. Visitors used its landscaped grounds as a park. 13 In 1860 James B. Waller created a 53-acre estate he called Buena and built a residence called Buena House. Waller’s house stood on the present site of St. Mary of the Lake Church at 4220 North Sheridan Road. In the 1880s Waller turned part of his estate into a residential development of 50-foot lots called Buena Park. This development was part of an area annexed by Chicago in 1889. Buena Park Buena Park retained its suburban character after it became a city neighborhood. In 1896 the North Shore Suburban newspaper described Buena Park as one of “the imperial suburbs of Chicago.” Buena Park was said to be famed “no less for its natural beauty than for its refined, intellectual and god-fearing citizens.” The newspaper described residents relaxing on their porches in the cool of the evening and “listening to the plaintive melodies of the bugler at the Marine Hospital or exchanging confidences in horticulture.” 14 One Buena Park resident was the famed architect William LeBaron Jenney, who lived in a villa on Bittersweet Place. Jenney invented steel frame building construction, which he used to build the upper stories of the world’s first skyscraper, Chicago’s Home Insurance Building. The Home Insurance Building stood on the northeast corner of LaSalle and Adams before it was replaced by the art deco Field Building. Jenney as a young man studied architecture in Paris, where he learned about techniques used by medieval architects to build cathedrals with great windows.
Recommended publications
  • Pittsfield Building 55 E
    LANDMARK DESIGNATION REPORT Pittsfield Building 55 E. Washington Preliminary Landmarkrecommendation approved by the Commission on Chicago Landmarks, December 12, 2001 CITY OFCHICAGO Richard M. Daley, Mayor Departmentof Planning and Developement Alicia Mazur Berg, Commissioner Cover: On the right, the Pittsfield Building, as seen from Michigan Avenue, looking west. The Pittsfield Building's trademark is its interior lobbies and atrium, seen in the upper and lower left. In the center, an advertisement announcing the building's construction and leasing, c. 1927. Above: The Pittsfield Building, located at 55 E. Washington Street, is a 38-story steel-frame skyscraper with a rectangular 21-story base that covers the entire building lot-approximately 162 feet on Washington Street and 120 feet on Wabash Avenue. The Commission on Chicago Landmarks, whose nine members are appointed by the Mayor, was established in 1968 by city ordinance. It is responsible for recommending to the City Council that individual buildings, sites, objects, or entire districts be designated as Chicago Landmarks, which protects them by law. The Comm ission is staffed by the Chicago Department of Planning and Development, 33 N. LaSalle St., Room 1600, Chicago, IL 60602; (312-744-3200) phone; (312­ 744-2958) TTY; (312-744-9 140) fax; web site, http ://www.cityofchicago.org/ landmarks. This Preliminary Summary ofInformation is subject to possible revision and amendment during the designation proceedings. Only language contained within the designation ordinance adopted by the City Council should be regarded as final. PRELIMINARY SUMMARY OF INFORMATION SUBMITIED TO THE COMMISSION ON CHICAGO LANDMARKS IN DECEMBER 2001 PITTSFIELD BUILDING 55 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Planners Guide to Chicago 2013
    Planners Guide to Chicago 2013 2013 Lake Baha’i Glenview 41 Wilmette Temple Central Old 14 45 Orchard Northwestern 294 Waukegan Golf Univ 58 Milwaukee Sheridan Golf Morton Mill Grove 32 C O N T E N T S Dempster Skokie Dempster Evanston Des Main 2 Getting Around Plaines Asbury Skokie Oakton Northwest Hwy 4 Near the Hotels 94 90 Ridge Crawford 6 Loop Walking Tour Allstate McCormick Touhy Arena Lincolnwood 41 Town Center Pratt Park Lincoln 14 Chinatown Ridge Loyola Devon Univ 16 Hyde Park Peterson 14 20 Lincoln Square Bryn Mawr Northeastern O’Hare 171 Illinois Univ Clark 22 Old Town International Foster 32 Airport North Park Univ Harwood Lawrence 32 Ashland 24 Pilsen Heights 20 32 41 Norridge Montrose 26 Printers Row Irving Park Bensenville 32 Lake Shore Dr 28 UIC and Taylor St Addison Western Forest Preserve 32 Wrigley Field 30 Wicker Park–Bucktown Cumberland Harlem Narragansett Central Cicero Oak Park Austin Laramie Belmont Elston Clybourn Grand 43 Broadway Diversey Pulaski 32 Other Places to Explore Franklin Grand Fullerton 3032 DePaul Park Milwaukee Univ Lincoln 36 Chicago Planning Armitage Park Zoo Timeline Kedzie 32 North 64 California 22 Maywood Grand 44 Conference Sponsors Lake 50 30 Park Division 3032 Water Elmhurst Halsted Tower Oak Chicago Damen Place 32 Park Navy Butterfield Lake 4 Pier 1st Madison United Center 6 290 56 Illinois 26 Roosevelt Medical Hines VA District 28 Soldier Medical Ogden Field Center Cicero 32 Cermak 24 Michigan McCormick 88 14 Berwyn Place 45 31st Central Park 32 Riverside Illinois Brookfield Archer 35th
    [Show full text]
  • Learning English As a Strategy to Improve the Competiveness For
    1 LEARNING ENGLISH AS A STRATEGY TO IMPROVE THE COMPETIVENESS FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE TOURIST AND HOTEL MANAGEMENT INDUSTRY, CASE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, USA LUDY EDIKC SILVA LEON UNIVERSIDAD PEDAGÓGICA Y TECNOLÓGICA DE COLOMBIA FACULTAD SECCIONAL DUITAMA ESCUELA ADMINISTRACIÓN TURÍSTICA Y HOTELERA DUITAMA APRIL, 2018 1 2 LEARNING ENGLISH AS A STRATEGY TO IMPROVE THE COMPETIVENESS FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE TOURIST AND HOTEL MANAGEMENT INDUSTRY, CASE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, USA LUDY EDIKC SILVA LEON GUILLERMO IGNACIO CAPERA Thesis Director UNIVERSIDAD PEDAGÓGICA Y TECNOLÓGICA DE COLOMBIA FACULTAD SECCIONAL DUITAMA ESCUELA ADMINISTRACIÓN TURÍSTICA Y HOTELERA DUITAMA APRIL, 2018 2 3 On our way to get essential achievements we always found who are by our side, to support us and remind us the way when we are lost. To them we owe what we are and what we achieve. So this project is dedicated to all of them in my life 3 4 GRATEFULNESS Through all this process I learned so many valuable things for in my life, I developed new skills, meet met amazing people, and I had personal and professional growth. This enriched my life in so many ways that I’m so thankful that I couldn’t forget to thank all those who make part of this process. First I would like to thank to God who gave me the opportunity to live this experience, He directed my way and provided me patience, strength and wisdom to finish this process. To my dear parents Alba Marina Leon and Ely Silva, for their constant support and love in every moment, without them I wouldn’t be what I am today.
    [Show full text]
  • Office Buildings of the Chicago School: the Restoration of the Reliance Building
    Stephen J. Kelley Office Buildings of the Chicago School: The Restoration of the Reliance Building The American Architectural Hislorian Carl Condit wrote of exterior enclosure. These supporting brackets will be so ihe Reliance Building, "If any work of the structural arl in arranged as to permit an independent removal of any pari the nineteenth Century anticipated the future, it is this one. of the exterior lining, which may have been damaged by The building is the Iriumph of the structuralist and funclion- fire or otherwise."2 alist approach of the Chicago School. In its grace and air- Chicago architect William LeBaron Jenney is widely rec- iness, in the purity and exactitude of its proportions and ognized as the innovator of the application of the iron details, in the brilliant perfection of ils transparent eleva- frame and masonry curtain wall for skyscraper construc- tions, it Stands loday as an exciting exhibition of the poten- tion. The Home Insurance Building, completed in 1885, lial kinesthetic expressiveness of the structural art."' The exhibited the essentials of the fully-developed skyscraper Reliance Building remains today as the "swan song" of the on its main facades with a masonry curtain wall.' Span• Chicago School. This building, well known throughout the drei beams supported the exterior walls at the fourth, sixth, world and lisled on the US National Register of Historie ninth, and above the tenth levels. These loads were Irans- Places, is presenlly being restored. Phase I of this process ferred to stone pier footings via the metal frame wilhout which addresses the exterior building envelope was com- load-bearing masonry walls.'1 The strueture however had pleted in November of 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat of the 21St Century: a Global Perspective
    Buildings 2012, 2, 384-423; doi:10.3390/buildings2040384 OPEN ACCESS buildings ISSN 2075-5309 www.mdpi.com/journal/buildings/ Article Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat of the 21st Century: A Global Perspective Mir M. Ali 1 and Kheir Al-Kodmany 2,* 1 School of Architecture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Urban Planning and Policy Department, College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]. Received: 26 July 2012; in revised form: 5 September 2012 / Accepted: 10 September 2012 / Published: 28 September 2012 Abstract: The tall building is the most dominating symbol of the cities and a human-made marvel that defies gravity by reaching to the clouds. It embodies unrelenting human aspirations to build even higher. It conjures a number of valid questions in our minds. The foremost and fundamental question that is often asked: Why tall buildings? This review paper seeks to answer the question by laying out arguments against and for tall buildings. Then, it provides a brief account of the historic and recent developments of tall buildings including their status during the current economic recession. The paper argues that as cities continue to expand horizontally, to safeguard against their reaching an eventual breaking point, the tall building as a building type is a possible solution by way of conquering vertical space through agglomeration and densification. Case studies of some recently built tall buildings are discussed to illustrate the nature of tall building development in their respective cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Envelope • Sustainability Consulting
    BUILDING ENVELOPE • SUSTAINABILITY CONSULTING • MONITORING 40 Bond Street InterActiveCorp (IAC) Headquarters 841 Broadway New York, NY New York, NY New York, NY Hearst Tower World Trade Centers 1-4, 7 Bank of America at New York, NY 9/11 Memorial and Museum One Bryant Park New York, NY New York, NY FIRM INTRODUCTION Vidaris, Inc. is a consulting firm specializing in building envelope, sustainability and energy efficiency. The company was created by combining the legacy firms of Israel Berger and Associates, LLC (IBA) and Viridian Energy & Environmental, LLC. Formed in 1994, IBA established an exterior wall consulting practice providing niche services to real estate owners, owner representatives and architects. Services were provided for new construction as well as investigation, repositioning, repair, and restoration of existing buildings. Later expansion included roofing as well as waterproofing consulting, encompassing the entire building envelope. IBA developed into an industry-leading resource. Viridian Energy & Environmental was established in 2006, providing consulting services to assist building owners and managers in energy efficiency, sustainability and LEED certifications. Energy modeling expertise set Viridian apart from other consultants offering more standardized service and support. In 2011, IBA and Viridian Energy & Environmental merged their specialized service offerings to form Vidaris. As building envelope designs and mechanical systems were becoming more complex, the two companies recognized that it was an opportunity, more so a necessity, for them to be able to provide a holistic approach to these closely related disciplines for their clients. Deep technical knowledge, a long proven track record, reputation, and a sophisticated analytical approach would allow Vidaris to provide a level of service second to none.
    [Show full text]
  • PRESERVATION CHICAGO the New York Life Insurance Building
    2 0 0 6 PRESERVATION CHICAGO Chicago’s Seven Most Threatened Buildings The New York Life Insurance Building Address: 39 South LaSalle Street Date: 1894 Architect: William Lebaron Jenney Style: Chicago School Skyscraper CHRS Rating: Orange National Register: Not Listed Overview: George Orwell said in Animal Farm that all animals are equal, except some animals are more equal than others. The same could be argued that in Chicago, depending on how much clout one has, some Landmarks are more equal than others. Based on some recent proposals for downtown skyscraper projects, a separate and unequal set of standards has revealed itself regarding how the Commission on Chicago Landmarks considers changes to existing Landmarked buildings and Landmark Districts. Case in point is the current redevelopment plan proposed for the New York Life Building, one of William LeBaron Jenney’s seminal early skyscrapers. History: William LeBaron Jenney revolutionized world architecture with the development of the first skyscraper, the Home Insurance Building in Chicago in 1884. His pioneering use of the steel skeleton frame, rather than the thick heavy masonry bearing walls that were then the norm, set the standard for modern high-rise construction that is still in use today. With the demolition of the Home Insurance Building in 1931, the New York Life Building became the last remaining example of Jenney’s early steel frame skyscraper construction and is the closest link with the ground-breaking technology of Jenney’s Home Insurance Building. Furthermore, the role of Chicago as the “insurance broker to the West” cannot be understated, and this building serves as a key link to that history.
    [Show full text]
  • Fractious Firsts Carol Willis, Founding Director, the Skyscraper Museum the Tallest Building in the World Today, the 828-Meter B
    Fractious Firsts Carol Willis, Founding Director, The Skyscraper Museum The tallest building in the world today, the 828-meter Burj Khalifa, as well as the one perhaps on its way to 1,000-meter height, Jeddah Tower, are bearing-wall structures – much like the first and tallest of New York’s early skyscrapers, the 1874 Tribune Tower. Thick walls (either of 19th-century brick and stone or 21st-century reinforced concrete) hold up these buildings – not a skeleton of steel, the major material and method of skyscraper construction for most of the 20th century. When the CTBUH organized the October 2019 conference “First Skyscrapers/ Skyscraper Firsts,” they fell victim to confirmation bias*. Implicit in the call for papers was a definition of “skyscraper” as a tall building constructed of steel. This was made clear in the initial emphasis on Chicago’s Home Insurance Building as the putative “first skyscraper.” When the steering committee adamantly rejected the proposal that vying presenters debate the priority of a single building in the history of the type, the conference title was adjusted to the plural: First Skyscrapers/ Skyscraper Firsts. This conceptualization is still a problem. The idea of a “first’ in the evolution of a building type that evolved from so many simultaneous forces and factors is unsound. Advances in technologies – whether the metal skeleton, passenger elevators in office buildings, or curtain walls – represent one aspect in the fairly sudden appearance of buildings of nine or ten stories in the early 1870s. But also key were the dynamics of urbanization – cities’ burgeoning populations and competition for expensive land and prime locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Walkingtours
    Walking Tours Why a Walking Tour? Chicago Architecture Foundation walking tours get you up close to 2016 WALKING TOUR PRICING PER PERSON some of the most famous buildings in the world. Experienced CAF docents will lead you through the heart of Chicago in small groups, TIERTIER 1 1 TIER 2 creating an intimate experience for guests to receive personal Retail Price: $20 Retail Price: $15 attention with time for questions and more in-depth observations. Private Group Rate: $18* Private Group Rate: $13.50* Industry Rate: $15 Industry Rate: $11.25 Recommended Tours *All private walking tours have a $200 minimum requirement BUILDING CHICAGO Historic Skyscrapers Art Deco Skyscrapers: Downtown Historic Treasures Take a step back in time to learn the In the boom years of the Roaring 20s, of Culture and Commerce stories behind some world-famous early Chicago architects designed numerous After the World’s Columbian Exposition skyscrapers. Highlights include: Burnham awe-inspiring skyscrapers adorned with the of 1893, Chicago was determined to and Root’s Rookery (1888) with its Moorish lavish materials and geometric ornament become a great cultural and commercial revival exterior and restored Frank Lloyd that epitomized the new modern style of metropolis. This tour is a testament to that Wright interior; Adler and Sullivan’s the era––Art Deco. Hear the origins of Art era’s ambitions. See buildings by Burnham, Auditorium Building (1889), a masterpiece of Deco and discover the popular motifs that Sullivan, Holabird and Roche and other engineering, design and acoustics; Holabird are its hallmarks around the world. Admire noted architects.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Properties Identification Report
    Section 106 Historic Properties Identification Report North Lake Shore Drive Phase I Study E. Grand Avenue to W. Hollywood Avenue Job No. P-88-004-07 MFT Section No. 07-B6151-00-PV Cook County, Illinois Prepared For: Illinois Department of Transportation Chicago Department of Transportation Prepared By: Quigg Engineering, Inc. Julia S. Bachrach Jean A. Follett Lisa Napoles Elizabeth A. Patterson Adam G. Rubin Christine Whims Matthew M. Wicklund Civiltech Engineering, Inc. Jennifer Hyman March 2021 North Lake Shore Drive Phase I Study Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... v 1.0 Introduction and Description of Undertaking .............................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Overview ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 NLSD Area of Potential Effects (NLSD APE) ................................................................................... 1 2.0 Historic Resource Survey Methodologies ..................................................................................... 3 2.1 Lincoln Park and the National Register of Historic Places ............................................................ 3 2.2 Historic Properties in APE Contiguous to Lincoln Park/NLSD ....................................................... 4 3.0 Historic Context Statements ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Draft Syllabus
    CREATING THE AMERICAN METROPOLIS Loyola University Chicago Prof. Timothy J. Gilfoyle HIST 386, Sec. 204 511 Crown Fall 2018 (773) 508-2221 Tuesday, 2:30-5 p.m. E-mail: [email protected] Corboy Law Center, Room L08 Office Hours: MW, 9-10am, 11:30am-2pm http://luc.edu/history/people/facultyandstaffdirectory/timothyjgilfoyle.shtml "God made the country and man made the town." William Cowper, 1780 The United States was born in the country and moved to the city. This course examines the transformation of the United States from a simple agrarian and small-town society to a complex urban and suburban nation. Field trips and walking tours are a vital component of the class. Between 1850 and 1950, American urban communities were transformed from "horizontal" cities of row houses, tenements and factories to "vertical" cities of apartments and skyscrapers. From New York's Brooklyn Bridge to Chicago's Sears Tower to San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge, the tower and the bridge epitomized American urbanism, and frequently America itself. Certain themes recur throughout the course of American urban and cultural history which will be focal points of this class: the interaction of private commerce with cultural change; the rise of distinctive working and middle classes; the creation and segregation of public and private spaces; 1 Sample Draft Syllabus the formation of new and distinctive urban subcultures organized by gender, work, race, religion, ethnicity, and sexuality; problems of health and housing resulting from congestion; and blatant social divisions among wealthy, poor, native-born, immigrant, and racial groups. More broadly, the course attempts to comprehend the American city within the changing questions of what it means to be an American.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name West Loop - LaSalle Street Historic District other names/site number 2. Location Roughly bounded by Wacker Drive, Wells Street, Van Buren Street street & number and Clark Street N/A not for publication N/A city or town Chicago vicinity state Illinois code IL county Cook code 031 zip code 60601-60604 60606, 60610 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national statewide local Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]