How to Write Letters to the Media

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How to Write Letters to the Media HOW TO WRITE LETTERS TO THE MEDIA Published by Accuracy In Media 4455 Connecticut Avenue N.W. #330 Washington, DC 20008 Phone: (202) 364-4401 Fax: (202) 364-4583 www.aim.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Secrets of Writing a Publishable Letter....................................…...3 Newspapers..........................................................................….…...6 Networks........................................................................................18 Magazines.............................................................................….....23 Secrets of Writing a Publishable Letter “To The Editor....” How often do you see a TV newscast or a newspaper article that is reported in such distorted fashion that truth is knocked senseless and left by the wayside? Do you sometimes feel that the media have totally abandoned reality in the way they report the news? Well, what are you going to do about it? Sit and fume or take pen in hand and let the people who run the media know that your are disgusted with distortions, inaccuracies and the intrusion of reportial opinion into supposedly “objective” news accounts? The purpose of this booklet is to give you suggestions that Accuracy In Media has developed over the years on how to write an effective letter to the editor that will be published. Those last words are italicized for a reason: regardless of the merit of the letter you write, unless it is printed in the paper, or given serious attention by the media person to whom it is addressed, you are wasting your time and your postage. AIM firmly believes in the power of the letter to the editor. Indeed, AIM had its genesis in such letters which founder Reed Irvine wrote to the media in the 1950s and 1960s, as a private citizen and as a member of a public affairs luncheon group. A friend of Mr. Irvine, Wilson C. “Chuck” Lucom, eventually suggested that the letters might carry more clout if they were on the letterhead of a media watchdog group, and in 1969 he paid the $200 necessary to incorporate Accuracy In Media, Inc. and get us started as a national membership group. The rest, as they say, is history. Readership polls consistently show that letters to the editor are one of the better-read features of a newspaper. Readers enjoy controversy. Having a citizen take arms against an editor (even if in written form) spices up the day’s paper. Being given countering information and views instructs citizens that they should not take the media at face value. Letters have several purposes (other than permitting you to blow off excessive steam). Let us summarize the two major purposes of letters: --For publication. Your purpose is to provide a printable rebuttal to an error or a misinterpretation of a story that has appeared in the paper or on a telecast. Here conciseness and directness are paramount, for reasons I’ll discuss below. --For information. Your purpose is to give the editor or TV producer facts, which can be used in subsequent news reports. These letters, of necessity, will be longer than those intended for publication. Of course, even an “information” letter can be supplemented by a shorter version intended for publication. Accuracy In Media’s consultant on letter writing is a remarkable Ohioan named Walter Seifert, professor emeritus of journalism at Ohio State University. Mr. Seifert’s Herculean feat of having more than 1600 letters published earned him an entry in the 1990 edition of the Guinness Book of World of Records. Although the category has been discontinued, AIM’s good friend Walt is now at what he calls “the 4600 mark and counting.” Here are Walt Seifert’s rules for writing an effective letter to the editor. 1- Be legible. Type your letter, double-spaced preferably. If you write it by hand, make sure the editor can read it. Check your spelling, and use proper grammar. 2- Be timely. React at once; if you wait a week or so, the issue that upset you might be long past. But don’t dash of to the post office immediately upon writing your letter. Read it a few hours later to insure that you have expressed yourself well, and in language you really wish to see in print. In other words, “cool off.” Your subconscious might also inspire second thoughts of better words. 3- Be brief. Walt Seifert says it well: “If you can’t sell’em in three paragraphs, you won’t in 20.” Identify your complaint in the first sentence if possible, so that the editor knows why you are writing (“As your reporter Jane Doe wrote on May 23...”) Then expand on your theme using a factual source to make your case, i.e., The AIM Report or The New York Times. Many papers will require that you confirm the source, so anticipate their question by enclosing a copy of the article making your case. Many papers impose word limitations on letters. Abide by them, for an editor will enforce them (especially if he disagrees with you; “the other side,” of course, might be permitted a longer say). Meredith Oakley, who runs the letters column of the Arkansas Democrat Gazette, in Little Rock, notes that her paper’s 250-word limit comes out to about seven column inches of type, enough to tell most stories. 4- Be simple. Most readers don’t like long sentences or fancy words. Keep paragraphs short. Use punchy words. 5- Be constructive. If you condemn, suggest a better way. If you indulge in abusive language or name calling, you will be less effective. There is nothing wrong with humor. You might suggest, for instance, “Your columnist’s knowledge of Russian history dates back perhaps a week in time,” but don’t write that “Columnist Roe is dumber than an egg-sucking dog.” 6- Give complete information. Most papers require verification that you actually wrote the letter which arrived in their office, so give your address and both work and home phone numbers. Some editors, but not all, will do you the courtesy of checking with you when they make deletions for space so that your meaning is not distorted. But don’t count on the latter point—an even further reason to abide by the word limit. 7- Ask for a response. If the newspaper or TV station has confidence in the accuracy and fairness of the report you challenge, they should happy to set you straight. A polite request for a reply shows that you are serious about your complaint, and that you want it answered. If the media outlet does not respond in a reasonable period, you have good reason to write a stronger version of your letter. 8- Send a copy of your letter to the reporter or writer about whom you are complaining. Many papers will send the letter to the reporter as a matter of routine, but common courtesy is also involved. Your mother probably taught you not to talk about people behind their back. So let the reporter know what you are saying about him, and directly, rather than relying on an intra-office forwarding. 9- Keep copies of all letters you write. Many papers have a bias against publishing letters from readers who do not agree with their editorial policy, or who criticize their news coverage. If you can document that your letters are consistently being “spiked”—journalistic lingo for killed—you will have direct ammunition to use in a direct confrontation with the publisher (or even advertisers) 10- If you send in your letter by FAX, use discretion and common sense. Try to keep a one or two-page limit. Generally, it is safer to mail correspondence to the media to insure that it reaches the proper person. 11- And finally, share your complaints or comments with Accuracy In Media, Inc. Send a copy to us at AIM, 4455 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 330, Washington, DC 20008. Many papers limit the frequency of letters they’ll publish from a reader—once a month, twice a year, or so forth. I wouldn’t dare suggest outright that you violate a rule, which the media impose on the public. But if your dog happens to be literate, perhaps he would put his name on a letter to, say, The Washington Post. I’ve also heard reports that women resort to their maiden names to wiggle around the frequency restriction, and that men have been known to use their first and middle names. These rules won’t guarantee publication, but they’ll certainly increase your chances of publication. But, you might ask, “I have all these complaints, but I can’t write worth a hoot.” So, on behalf of Accuracy In Media, Inc., an offer: if you have something you wish to get off your chest, send the information to our office, along with supporting documentation concerning the point you wish to make. Within reason, we’ll draft a letter which you can use as you see fit. Our offer is not without bounds: for instance, don’t expect us to ghost any letters advocating the violent overthrow of the government, or cannibalism. Enclose a stamped and self-addressed envelope so that we can get the draft back to you promptly. Now, as is said among folks who make their living from the printed word. Write on! Accuracy In Media, Inc. An acknowledgement: Special thanks go to Walt Seifert for his rules. MEDIA ROAD MAP NEWSPAPERS The Arizona Republic Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 200 East Van Buren, Post Office Box 1950 Phoenix, AZ 85001 Tel: 602-271-8000 Fax: 602-271-8044 www.azcentral.com Arkansas Democrat Gazette 121 East Capitol St., Post Office Box 2221 Little Rock, AR 72203-2221 Tel: 501-378-3400 Fax: 501-399-3663 www.ardemagaz.com Atlanta Journal- Constitution Cox Newspapers 72 Marietta St., NW Atlanta, GA 30303 Tel: 404-526-5151 Fax: 404-526-5746 www.ajc.com Austin American-Statesman Cox Newspapers 305 South Congress Ave., P.O.
Recommended publications
  • Qq Rr Sstt Utivvwwxxyyzz1234567890&/`Ea.$4(EV?( )[]
    Aa Bh CA- Dd EeFf Gg Flu Ii Jj Kk LI Mm No Oo Pp Qq Rr SsTt UtiVvWwXxYyZz1234567890&/`Ea.$4(EV?( )[] UPPER AND LOWER CASE.THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TYPOG PUBLISHED BY INTERNATIONALTYPEFACE CORPORATION,VOI.UME SEVEN. NUMBER FOUR, DEC. 1980 5741 (1981) VOLUME SEVEN, NUMBER FOUR, DECEMBER. 1980 HERB Lt./SALIN, EDITORIAL Sr DESIGN DIRECTOR AARON BURNS. EDITORIAL DIRECTOR EDWARD RON DTHALER. EDITORIAL DIRECTOR EDWARD GOTTSCHALL. EDITORIAL DIRECTOR MARION MULLER. ASSOCIATE EDITOR JASON CALM. JUREK WAJDOWICZ, DESIGN IS PRODUCTION EDITORS MICHAEL ARON. CLAUDIA CLAY. TONY DISPIGNA. JOE FEIGENBAUM. ART AND PRODUCTION R HODA SPARSER. RESEARCH DIRECTOR JOHN PRENTKI, BUSINESS MANAGER NANCY PORTER. EDITORIAL TRAFFIC COORDINATOR HELENA WALLSCH LAG. ADVERTISING/PRODUCTION MANAGER 0 INTERNATIONAL TYPEFACE CORPORATION 1980 PUBLISHED FOUR TIMES A YEAR IN MARCH, JUNE, SEPTEMBER AND DECEMBER BY INTERNATIONAL TYPEFACE CORPORATION 2 HAMMARSKJOLD PLAZA. NEW YORK. N.Y.10017 A JOINTLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF PHOTO-LETTERING. INC. AND LUBALIN. BURNS & CO., INC. CONTROLLED CIRCULATION POSTAGE PAID AT NEW YORK. N.Y. AND AT FARMINGDALE. N.Y. USTS PURL 073990 PUBLISHED IN U.S.A. ITC OFFICERS New career directions EDWARD RONDTHALER,CHAIRMAN AARON BURNS. PRESIDENT HERB LUSALIN, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT challenge everyone JOHN PRENTKI.VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL MANAGER BOB FARBER, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT ED BENGUIAT,VICE PRESIDENT STEPHEN KOPEC. VICE PRESIDENT involved with graphic U.S. SINGLE COPIES $1.50 ELSEWHERE. SINGLE COPIES 52.50 TO QUALIFY FOR FREE SUBSCRIPTION COMPLETE AND RETURN communications, THE SUBSCRIPTION FORM IN THIS ISSUE TO ITC OR WRITE TO THE ITC EXECUTIVE OFFICE. 2 HAMMARSKJOLD PLAZA. NEW YORK. N.Y. 10017 including students In this issue: and educators.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments of Communications Workers of America the Newspaper Guild/CWA National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians/CWA
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) 2010 Quadrennial Regulatory Review- ) MB Docket No. 09-192 Review of the Commission’s Broadcast ) Ownership Rules and Other Rules Adopted ) Pursuant to Section 202 of the ) Telecommunications Act of 1996 ) ) RFQ for Media Ownership Studies ) MB Docket No. 09-182 ) Comments of Communications Workers of America The Newspaper Guild/CWA National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians/CWA Eric D. Geist 501 Third St. N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 434-1193 (phone) (202) 434-1201 (fax) [email protected] Dated: July 12, 2010 SUMMARY The Commission’s broadcast media ownership rules are based on the First Amendment principle that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to public welfare. As the Commission has repeatedly stated and as the Courts have consistently confirmed, common ownership of media reduces viewpoint diversity and competition. In 2004, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals (“Third Circuit Court”) in Prometheus v FCC affirmed the authority of the Commission to regulate media ownership to foster viewpoint diversity, local identity, and prevent undue concentration of economic power. The Third Circuit Court acknowledged that structural rules limiting concentrated ownership of the media are necessary to protect and promote the free and vibrant press that is so vital to our democracy. The Commission adopted new language in 2008 that weakened the rules for limits on the newspaper/television ownership in the top 20 DMAs. It also provided an exception for the cross- media ownership ban for failed or failing properties that applies outside the top 20 DMAs.
    [Show full text]
  • TRIBUNE COMPANY Is a Media Industry Leader with Operations in 25 Major Markets Nationwide, Including 10 of the Top 12
    NEW YORK LOS ANGELES CHICAGO PHILADELPHIA BOSTON DALLAS WASHINGTON ATLANTA HOUSTON SEATTLE MIAMI FORT LAUDERDALE DENVER SACRAMENTO ORLANDO ST LOUIS BALTIMORE PORTLAND INDIANAPOLIS SAN DIEGO HARTFORD GRAND RAPIDS NEWPORT NEWS NEW ORLEANS HARRISBURG ALBANY ALLENTOWN GREENWICH STAMFORD NEW YORK LOS ANGELES CHICAGO PHILADELPHIA BOSTON DALLAS WASHINGTON ATLANTA HOUSTON SEATTLE MIAMI FORT LAUDERDALE DENVER SACRAMENTO ORLANDO ST LOUIS BALTIMORE PORTLAND INDIANAPOLIS SAN DIEGO HARTFORD GRAND RAPIDS NEW YORK LOS ANGELES CHICAGO PHILADELPHIA BOSTON DALLAS WASHINGTON ATLANTA HOUSTON SEATTLE MIAMI FORT LAUDERDALE DENVER SACRAMENTO ORLANDO ST LOUIS BALTIMORE PORTLAND INDIANAPOLIS SAN DIEGO HARTFORD GRAND RAPIDS NEWPORT NEWS NEW ORLEANS HARRISBURG ALBANY ALLENTOWN GREENWICH STAMFORD NEW YORK LOS ANGELES CHICAGO PHILADELPHIA BOSTON DALLAS WASHINGTON ATLANTA HOUSTON SEATTLE MIAMI FORT LAUDERDALE DENVER SACRAMENTO ORLANDO ST LOUIS BALTIMORE PORTLAND INDIANAPOLIS SAN DIEGO HARTFORD GRAND RAPIDS Creating Value: 20 Years as a Public Company 2003 Annual Report TRIBUNE COMPANY is a media industry leader with operations in 25 major markets nationwide, including 10 of the top 12. Through newspapers, television, radio and the Internet, we reach more than 80 percent of U.S. households. Revenues in 2003 totaled $5.6 billion. Broadcasting TELEVISION WBDC (WB50) KTXL (FOX40) WTXX (WB20) TELEVISION PROGRAMMING WPIX (WB11) Washington Sacramento, Calif. Hartford, Conn. New York wbdc.com fox40.com wtxx.com Tribune wb11.com Entertainment Co. WATL (WB36) KPLR (WB11) WXMI
    [Show full text]
  • Morrie Gelman Papers, Ca
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8959p15 No online items Morrie Gelman papers, ca. 1970s-ca. 1996 Finding aid prepared by Jennie Myers, Sarah Sherman, and Norma Vega with assistance from Julie Graham, 2005-2006; machine-readable finding aid created by Caroline Cubé. UCLA Library Special Collections Room A1713, Charles E. Young Research Library Box 951575 Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1575 (310) 825-4988 [email protected] ©2016 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Morrie Gelman papers, ca. PASC 292 1 1970s-ca. 1996 Title: Morrie Gelman papers Collection number: PASC 292 Contributing Institution: UCLA Library Special Collections Language of Material: English Physical Description: 80.0 linear ft.(173 boxes and 2 flat boxes ) Date (inclusive): ca. 1970s-ca. 1996 Abstract: Morrie Gelman worked as a reporter and editor for over 40 years for companies including the Brooklyn Eagle, New York Post, Newsday, Broadcasting (now Broadcasting & Cable) magazine, Madison Avenue, Advertising Age, Electronic Media (now TV Week), and Daily Variety. The collection consists of writings, research files, and promotional and publicity material related to Gelman's career. Physical location: Stored off-site at SRLF. Advance notice is required for access to the collection. Please contact UCLA Library Special Collections for paging information. Creator: Gelman, Morrie Restrictions on Access Open for research. STORED OFF-SITE AT SRLF. Advance notice is required for access to the collection. Please contact UCLA Library Special Collections for paging information. Restrictions on Use and Reproduction Property rights to the physical object belong to the UC Regents. Literary rights, including copyright, are retained by the creators and their heirs.
    [Show full text]
  • TIMES MIRROR COMPANY ET AL V. CITY of LOS ANGELES
    192 Cal. App. 3d 170, *; 1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1761, **; 237 Cal. Rptr. 346, ***; 14 Media L. Rep. 1289 TIMES MIRROR COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent No. B023000 Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, Division Two 192 Cal. App. 3d 170; 1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1761; 237 Cal. Rptr. 346; 14 Media L. Rep. 1289 May 28, 1987 SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: [**1] Appellants' petition for review by the Supreme Court was denied September 2, 1987. Mosk, J., was of the opinion that the petition should be granted. PRIOR HISTORY: Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. C511941, John L. Cole, Judge. DISPOSITION: The judgment is affirmed. CASE SUMMARY PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Plaintiff newspapers appealed the summary judgment entered by the Superior Court of Los Angeles County (California) in favor of defendant city in plaintiffs' action that challenged the validity, on constitutional grounds, of a business tax imposed by defendant. OVERVIEW: Plaintiff newspapers challenged, on constitutional grounds, the validity of a business tax collected by defendant city. Defendant was awarded summary judgment, and plaintiffs appealed. The court found that there was no constitutional problem with the tax and affirmed the judgment. The court noted that although the government could not unduly burden free speech through taxation or other regulatory measures, it was beyond dispute that the federal constitution did not exempt newspapers from generally applicable regulations and taxes. The court further stated that a compelling state interest was not needed to collect such a tax as long as newspapers were treated no differently than others who were similarly situated.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinclair's Use of Shield Law Unanimously Upheld by the Supreme Court of California BALTIMORE, Nov. 3 /Prnewswire/ -- on November
    Sinclair's Use of Shield Law Unanimously Upheld by the Supreme Court of California BALTIMORE, Nov. 3 /PRNewswire/ -- On November 1, 1999, the Supreme Court of California unanimously overturned the California Court of Appeal and upheld the right of a Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: SBGI) news director at KOVR-TV in Sacramento, California to invoke the California Constitution's shield law in refusing to disclose unpublished information to a State of California prosecutor. The State unsuccessfully asserted that its state right to "due process of law" was being violated. In its decision, the California Supreme Court emphasized the importance of protecting the autonomy of the press. The case (Miller vs. The Superior Court of San Joaquin County) involved the refusal by KOVR-TV's news director, in the face of contempt of court charges, to turn over to a state prosecutor unpublished portions of a videotaped interview with a prisoner who had confessed to sheriff's investigators that he had killed his cellmate. KOVR-TV invoked the shield law in support of its decision to submit only the broadcast portions of the interview rather than the entire interview which had been subpoenaed by the State of California. The Supreme Court of California upheld the use of the shield law and stated that the California shield law provided an absolute right, under California's state constitution, to protection for unpublished information that may only be overcome by a countervailing federal constitutional right (such as by a defendant's right to due process), and perhaps by a state constitutional right, but not by a "prosecutor's right to due process" (i.e, to receive information that may help the prosecutor win his case).
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles Times All Rights Reserved Los Angeles Times
    Page 1 6 of 11 DOCUMENTS Copyright 1998 The Times Mirror Company; Los Angeles Times All Rights Reserved Los Angeles Times October 13, 1998, Tuesday, Home Edition SECTION: Part A; Page 1; Metro Desk LENGTH: 2305 words SERIES: Failure to Provide: Los Angeles County's Child Support Crisis. Last in a series. HEADLINE: COUNTY, STATE BOTH GET BLAME ON CHILD SUPPORT BYLINE: NICHOLAS RICCARDI and GREG KRIKORIAN, TIMES STAFF WRITERS BODY: Los Angeles County's child support failure is just a piece of a much larger puzzle. The entire state of California for years has languished near the bottom of the nation in many categories of collecting child support. This year alone, an estimated 3 million children statewide will go without the money they are owed. As the largest and by most measures worst county in California in collecting support, Los Angeles is blamed by many for pulling the state down in national rankings. But the only way to truly change Los Angeles' performance would appear to be to restructure the entire state system. That prospect, for now, seems unlikely. Past efforts to reform the state's child support system have been largely blocked by the powerful county district attorneys, whose agencies receive millions of dollars in incentive payments from the federal government. "The question here is not whether the line workers and the local D.A.'s are working their tails off," said Assemblywoman Dion Aroner (D-Berkeley). "But it doesn't seem to change how we're doing. At some point you say maybe we have to totally revamp what we're doing." State officials charged with running California's child support system say that, although the program is still in need of improvement, it is moving forward after years of neglect.
    [Show full text]
  • The Business of News: a Challenge for Journalism’S Next Generation
    THE BUSINESS OF NEWS: A CHALLENGE FOR JOURNALISM’S NEXT GENERATION By Cynthia Gorney A Report of Carnegie Corporation of New York The Business of News: a Challenge for Journalism’s Next Generation by Cynthia Gorney Carnegie Corporation of New York Forum on the Public Interest and the Business of News Cynthia Gorney, formerly with the The Washington Post, still often contributes to that news- paper as well as to the American Journalism Review, The New York Times Magazine and other publications. Currently, she is associate professor, Graduate School of Journalism, at the University of California, Berkeley. table of contents Introduction v by Vartan Gregorian The Business of News: a Challenge for Journalism’s Next Generation 1 by Cynthia Gorney Appendix A 25 List of Participants Appendix B 29 Broadcasting and the Public Interest by Janice Hui and Craig L. LaMay cover photos: Ben Fraker, Zoran Jovanovic, AP/Wide World Photos, Getty Images, Wonderfile Corporation, Comstock Images photos pages 1-24: Ben Fraker Carnegie Corporation of New York was created by Andrew Carnegie in 1911 to promote “the advancement and diffusion of knowledge and understanding.” Under Carnegie’s will, grants must benefit the people of the United States, although up to 7.4 percent of the funds may be used for the same purpose in countries that are or have been members of the British Commonwealth, with a current emphasis on sub-Saharan Africa. As a grantmaking foun- dation, the Corporation seeks to carry out Carnegie’s vision of philanthropy, which he said should aim “to do real and permanent good in this world.” Currently, the foundation focuses its work in four program areas: Education, International Development, International Peace and Security, and Strengthening U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of CBS Hollywood Television Studios
    1 The History of CBS Hollywood Television Studios By Bobby Ellerbee and Eyes Of A Generation.com Preface and Acknowledgement This is a unique look at the events that preceded the need for CBS television studios in Hollywood and, as in New York, the radio division is leading the way. This project is somewhat different than the prior reports on the New York studios of CBS and NBC, for two reasons. The first reason is that in that in those reports, television was brand new and being developed through the mechanical function to an electronic phenomenon. Most of that work occurred in and around their headquarters in New York. In this case, both CBS and NBC are at the mercy of geological and technological developments outside their own abilities…namely the Rocky Mountains and AT&T. The second reason has to do with the success of the network’s own stars. Their popularity on radio soon translated to public demand once “talking pictures” became possible. That led many New York based radio stars to Hollywood and, in a way, Mohammed had to come to the mountain. This story is told to the best of our abilities, as a great deal of the information on these facilities is now gone…like so many of the men and women who worked there. I’ve told this as concisely as possible, but some elements are dependent on the memories of those who were there many years ago, and from conclusions drawn from research. If you can add to this with facts or photos, please contact me as this is an ongoing project.
    [Show full text]
  • ****1************************************* * Reproductions Supplied by EDFS Are the Best That Can Be Made * from the Original Document
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 304 539 CE 052 052 AUTHOR Alamprese, Judith A.; And Others TITLE Project Literacy U.S. (PLUS): Impact of the First Year's Task Forces. Final Report. INSTITUTION COSMOS Corp., Washington, DC. SPONS AGENCY Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Washington, D.C. REPORT NO ISBN-0-942570-33-2 PUB DATE Dec 87 NOTE 193p. AVAILABLE FROMCOSMOS Corporation, 1735 Eye Street, NW, Suite 613, Washington, DC 20006 ($9.50). PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Basic Education; *Adult Literacy; Commercial Television; Community Involvement; Community Programs; *Cooperative Programs; Coordination; *Illiteracy; *Literacy Education; *Outreach Programs; *Public Service; Public Television; Student Recruitment IDENTIFIERS *Project Literacy U S ABSTRACT This report details an evaluation of the effects of outreach activities of Project Literacy U.S. (PLUS) on community responses to the illiteracy problem. Part A describes general findings regarding PLUS task force activities during the campaign's first year, December 1985-June 1987. Section I is an introduction; Section II describes activities that precede' the PLUS campaign, strategies that ABC and PBS used to develop the campaign, and simultaneous national literacy activities. Section III presents the conceptual approach and data collection methods. Section IV discusses development and functioning of task forces as mechanisms for coalescing support to combat illiteracy. Sections V-VII describe activities task forces performed to accomplish the three PLUS goals--awareness raising, community collaboration, and recruitment of volunteers and adult learners. Section VIII assesses lessons learned and presents recommendations for policy and practice. Part B presents five case studies of PLUS task forces, which illustrate the strategies used in supporting the PLUS campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission
    Application Filing Results Page 1 of 1 Federal Communications Commission FCC MB - CDBS Electronic Filing Account number: 537329 Description: WGN-TV WGN LATE JUNE 2010 AMENDMENT Application Reference Number: 20100428AEL Successfully filed at Jun 25 2010 2:47PM Based on the information supplied, no fee is required. Menu Logout https://licensing.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/cdbsmenu.hts?acct=537329&contex... 6/25/2010 CDBS Print Page 1 of 7 Federal Communications Commission Approved by OMB FOR FCC USE ONLY Washington, D.C. 20554 3060-0031 (April 2009) FCC 314 APPLICATION FOR CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT OF FOR COMMISSION USE ONLY FILE NO. BROADCAST STATION CONSTRUCTION PERMIT OR - 20100428AEL LICENSE Read INSTRUCTIONS Before Filling Out Form Section I - General Information 1. Legal Name of the Licensee/Permittee WGN CONTINENTAL BROADCASTING COMPANY, DEBTOR-IN-POSSSESSION Mailing Address 435 N. MICHIGAN AVENUE City State or Country (if foreign address) Zip Code CHICAGO IL 60611 - Telephone Number (include area code) E-Mail Address (if available) 3122223333 FCC Registration Number: Call Sign Facility ID Number 0018342915 WGN-TV 72115 2. Contact Representative (if other than licensee/permittee) Firm or Company Name JOHN R. FEORE, JR. DOW LOHNES PLLC Mailing Address 1200 NEW HAMPSHIRE AVENUE, NW SUITE 800 City State or Country (if foreign address) ZIP Code WASHINGTON DC 20036 - Telephone Number (include area code) E-Mail Address (if available) 2027762000 [email protected] 3. Legal Name of the Assignee WGN CONTINENTAL BROADCASTING COMPANY Mailing Address C/O WGN-TV 2501 WEST BRADLEY PLACE City State or Country (if foreign address) ZIP Code CHICAGO IL 60618 - Telephone Number (include area code) E-Mail Address (if available) 7735282311 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Survey of the 90 Fastest -Growing Media Companies
    What's Hot in Television Marketing CHANN EIS JUNE THE BUSINESS OF COMMUNICATIONS 1987 ACHI EV ERS The Annual Survey of the 90 Fastest -Growing Media Companies A. H. BELO CORPORATION AARON SPELLING PRODUCTIONS INC ADAMS -RUSSELL CO. INC ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION AMERICAN CABLE - fAH7fl)o SYSTEMS CORPORATION AMERICAN FAMILY CORPORATION ATC (AMERICAN có3C0 TELEVISION AND COMMUNICATIONS COR- 00 C PORATION) BARRIS INDUSTRIES C.O.M.B. CO t-+ `r1 O r) f.+ CABLEVI SION SYSTEMS CORPORATION CAPITAL < Or, CITIES/ABC INC CBS CENTEL CORPORATION CEN- rItl el O HZ H TURY COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION CHRIS-CRAFT yy r'i INDUSTRIES INC CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS INC -CC THE COCA -CO _A COMPANY COMCAST 4 D O CORPORATION COX 230 ENTERPRISES INC DELAURENTIIS ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC DICK O CLARK PRODUCTIONS INC THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY EMMIS b ~ BROADCASTING CCRPORATION FINANCIAL NEWS NETWORK FRIES EN- TERTAINMENT INC GANNETT CO. INC GE (GENERAL ELECTRIC) GENCORP J GRAY COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS INC GULF+WESTERN NC HAL ROACH H STUDIOS INC HERITAGE COMMUNICATIONS INC HERITAGE ENTERTAINMENT INC CT] rr HOME SHOPPING NETWCRK INC INFINITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION JACOR Or+ COMMUNICATIONS INC JOHN BLAIR & COMPANY JONES INTERCABLE INC KING WORLD QO PRODUCTIONS INC KNIGHT-RIDDER INCORPORATED LEE ENTERPRISES INC THE LIBERTY COR- D PORATION LIN BROADCASTING CORPORATION LORIMAR-TELEPICTURES CORPORATION MACLEAN HUNTER LIMITED MAI CITE COMMUNICATIONS GROUP INC MCA INC McGRAW-HILL INC p MEDIA GENERAL INC MEREDITH CORPORATION MGM/UA COMMUNICATIONS CO MULTIMEDIA INC
    [Show full text]