DOCSLIB.ORG

Philosophical Ancestry of the American Library Information Science

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DOCUMENT RESUME ED 406 977 IR 056 339 AUTHOR Nitecki, Joseph Z. TITLE Philosophical Ancestry of the American Library Information Science. PUB DATE Apr 97 NOTE 259p.; For related documents, see ED 363 346 and ED 381 162. PUB TYPE Information Analyses (070) Reports - Research (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC11 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Citations (References); *Information Science; *Keywords; Librarians; *Library Science; Meta Analysis; *Philosophy IDENTIFIERS *Library Literature; Philosophers; Philosophical Research ABSTRACT This work supplements a previous work, "Philosophical Aspects of Library Information Science in Retrospect." It explores Library Information Science, which deals with the facilitation of recorded knowledge, the metalibrarianship encompassing the theoretical aspects of a broad range of recorded communications, and the philosophies thereof. This essay identifies relationships between published librarians interested in philosophical aspects of the field and their philosophical "mentors." Philosophers cited by librarians are identified and their major contributions to philosophy are briefly summarized. The impact of cited philosophers on the philosophy of Library Information Science is inferred from the comments made by citing librarians. The study draws keywords from librarians' comments, earmarks them as representative of certain philosophical concepts, and examines how frequently they appear. This examination fuels consideration of various relationships between philosophers and their views, ways terminology is interpreted, and theoretical background of Library Information. Appendices contain:(1) profiles of cited philosophers;(2) major philosophical systems; (3) major key words;(4) frequency of key words citations; and (5) analysis of the most frequently cited words. (Contains 242 references.) (AEF) ******************************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ******************************************************************************** U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. S CN Points of view or opinions stated in this () document do not necessarily represent C) official OERI position or policy. PHILOSOPHICAL ANCESTRY THE AMERICAN LIBRARYOF SCIENCE INFORMATION by Joseph Z. Nitecki 1997 BEST COPY AVAILABLE "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY Joseph Z. Nitecki TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)." ABSTRACT This is a supplement to the compilation ofessays in the philosophy of the American librarianship (Nitecki, 1995). Each philosopher mentioned in that compilation is discussed separately in Part II of this essay, with brief description of his viewpoints, comments about him and the relevance of his philosophy to librarianship. The impact of the listed philosophers on the philosophy of librarianship is inferred from the statements made about them by persons citing them. Each selected statement is abbreviated with its first word considereda key word for the subject addressed. Various relationships between the philosophers, their views, key words and levels of their interpretations are described in the appendixes to this study. 1 CONTENTS Part I. The Analysis 1. Introduction 2. Methodology 3. Perceived Heritage a. Profiles of Philosophers b. Major Philosophical Systems c. Philosophical Issues d. Key words as Indicators of Philosophical subjects e, Most Frequently Cited Data f. Significance of Most Frequently Cited Data 4. Bibliographical Distribution 5. The Nature of Emerging Pattern 6. Major Characteristics of Library Information Science Philosophical Tradition. Part II. The Progenitors Part III. Appendixes. 1: Profiles of Cited Philosophers A. Philosophers Characteristics B . Schools of Philosophy 2: Major Philosophical Systems A. Synopsis B . Examples of Contrasting Interpretations of Some Philosophical Concepts 3: Major Key Words 4: Frequency of Key Words Citations 5: Analyzes of Most Frequently Cited Key Words A. Most Frequently Used Key Words B . Key Words related to Cited Philosophers C. Summary of Key Words Arranged by Date D. Levels of Cited Key Words E. List of Key Words Cited by Selected Librarians F. Summary of Key Words Cited by Selected Librarians Part IV. Bibliography 4 2 PART I: THE ANALYSIS 1. Introduction. Bibliothecal communication always takes place between past recorded knowledge and its present recipients. It relates to the processes, both physical and cultural, which to some extend made each of us individually, and all of us together, what we are. To understand ourselves and the world around us, we communicate with experiences of others through available records. Library information science deals with facilitation of recorded knowledge, the metalibrarianship encompassing the theoretical aspects of a broad range of recorded communications, and the philosophy of metalibrarianship searches for the meaning, the nature and values of such communication. This essay attempts to identify some relationships between individuals interested in philosophical aspects of Library Information Science (LIS) and their philosophical mentors. 2. Methodology. The study is based on the thorough review of all essays in English language, listed in the Library Literature under 'Librarianship, Philosophical Aspects' in J. Z. Nitecki: Philosophical Aspects of LIS in Retrospect, 1995.1 The total literature in American philosophy of librarianship is small, hence the citations are relatively few; however, within that small sample there are some interesting relations. Although this type of study does not lend itself to the rigor of the 3 scientific analysis, some numerical relations between the kinds of philosophers cited, their profiles, and the topics identified by the citations may suggest interesting patterns within the discipline. Limitations of the analyses are determined by the degree of subjectivity in formulating, classifying and interpreting data. The scope of the study is well defined, statistical descriptions are simple and obvious but the selection of key words and designations of their interpretative levels are of necessity subjective. The study includes all individuals who are identified as philosophers in the Encyclopedia of Philosophy, although not all are also listed in either of the philosophical dictionaries consulted. The criteria for selecting the key words were determined by the actual context of the domain studied, i.e., they refer to the summaries provided in the second part of this study only, not necessarily reflecting major philosophical concepts of cited philosophers. The impact of philosophers on LIS is inferred from the examination of key words in the summaries of the philosophers viewpoints listed in appendixes. They provide numerical analysis of relationships between philosophers, their profiles and impact on librarians who cited them. The study identified 503 keywords referred to ninety-four philosophers cited by 154 authors in the 225 essays published in library literature on the subject of library philosophy.2 In Part II of this study the philosophers cited by librarians were identified and their major contributions to philosophy 6 4 briefly summarized. The individual entries consist of paraphrased extracts from The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, a handbook (Avey, 1954) and two dictionaries (Angels, 1992 and Runes, 1981). The impact of cited philosophers on the philosophy of LIS is inferred from the comments made about each philosopher by citing librarians. The annotations vary in scope. Some references relate cited philosophers directly to the issues in philosophy of library information science, others are mere casual notes or quotes, indicating librarian's familiarity with a given philosopher. Appendixes contain numerical descriptions of various relationships between the philosophers, their profiles, key words expressing their philosophical views and the authors citing them in American library literature. Appendix-1 contains (1) the list of philosophers cited by librarians, arranged in alphabetical order with a note about the period, nationality of each philosopher and his major school affiliation. It also included numerical summary of nationalities, cited schools of philosophy, and their rank order (Appx-la). Appx-2: This appendix list all philosophical schools of philosophy and the philosophers affiliated with them (Table 1). It also includes some philosophers that are not reviewed in this study, but who are important representatives of particular schools. The appendix also includes examples of contrasting interpretations of some major philosophical concepts (Table 2). The list is arranged in two columns: first represents conceptual, frequently metaphysical, definitions, the second the 5 experiential, mostly epistemological, interpretations. Following each pair of concepts is a brief note about its possible equivalence in philosophy of metalibrarianship ('M'). Appendix-3 consists of primary data on which all the statistical descriptions of this study are based. It lists sequentially all philosophers cited in this study arranged by periods, followed by abbreviated key words and levels of their interpretations by quoted librarians. Column (a) refers to the philosophers listed by name in Appendix 4.
Recommended publications
  • Librarianship and the Philosophy of Information

    Librarianship and the Philosophy of Information

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln July 2005 Librarianship and the Philosophy of Information Ken R. Herold Hamilton College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Herold, Ken R., "Librarianship and the Philosophy of Information" (2005). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 27. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/27 Library Philosophy and Practice Vol. 3, No. 2 (Spring 2001) (www.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/lppv3n2.htm) ISSN 1522-0222 Librarianship and the Philosophy of Information Ken R. Herold Systems Manager Burke Library Hamilton College Clinton, NY 13323 “My purpose is to tell of bodies which have been transformed into shapes of a different kind.” Ovid, Metamorphoses Part I. Library Philosophy Provocation Information seems to be ubiquitous, diaphanous, a-categorical, discrete, a- dimensional, and knowing. · Ubiquitous. Information is ever-present and pervasive in our technology and beyond in our thinking about the world, appearing to be a generic ‘thing’ arising from all of our contacts with each other and our environment, whether thought of in terms of communication or cognition. For librarians information is a universal concept, at its greatest extent total in content and comprehensive in scope, even though we may not agree that all information is library information. · Diaphanous. Due to its virtuality, the manner in which information has the capacity to make an effect, information is freedom. In many aspects it exhibits a transparent quality, a window-like clarity as between source and patron in an ideal interface or a perfect exchange without bias.
  • Computer Information Science Associate in Applied Science Degree (AAS)

    Computer Information Science Associate in Applied Science Degree (AAS)

    Computer Information Science Associate in Applied Science Degree (AAS) At a Glance The Computer Information Science program is designed to prepare students to be successful or enhance their careers in select, high-demand, information technology fields. Special emphasis is placed on the knowledge and skills needed in the small business computer environment. In addition, this program provides a solid foundation for those considering transferring to a senior institution. Students should consult with an advisor or the faculty teaching in their discipline with regard to the suggested sequence for scheduling of courses. General Education & Elective Courses CREDITS CIS 146 Microcomputer Applications ...................................................................................3 ENG 101 English Composition I .............................................................................................3 MTH 100 Intermediate College Algebra ..................................................................................3 MTH 112 Precalculus Algebra .................................................................................................3 ORI 105 Orientation & Student Success ................................................................................3 SPH 106 Fundamentals of Oral Communication ....................................................................3 History, Social and Behavioral Science Elective .............................................................................3 Humanities and Fine Arts Elective ..................................................................................................3
  • Institut Für Informatik Der Technischen Universität München

    Institut Für Informatik Der Technischen Universität München

    INSTITUT FÜR INFORMATIK DER TECHNISCHEN UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN EOS: An Epistemological Ontology-driven System for Knowledge Processing Dipl.-Inform. Univ. Wolfgang Wohner Institut für Informatik der Technischen Universität München EOS: An Epistemological Ontology-driven System for Knowledge Processing Dipl.-Inform. Univ. Wolfgang Wohner Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät für Informatik der Technischen Universität Mün- chen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Helmut Krcmar Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Univ.-Prof. Rudolf Bayer, Ph.D. 2. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Manfred Paul, em. Die Dissertation wurde am 27. Februar 2003 bei der Technischen Universität München einge- reicht und durch die Fakultät für Informatik am 22. Oktober 2003 angenommen. Title of the Thesis: EOS: An Epistemological Ontology-driven System for Knowledge Processing Author: Dipl.-Inform. Univ. Wolfgang Wohner Keywords: Knowledge Representation and Processing, Ontologies, Epistemology, Concept Theory Abstract: This thesis introduces EOS, a new approach to knowledge representation and processing that is based on Concept Theory, a unicategorical formalism we developed for defining semanti- cally enriched formal ontologies. Generally, ontologies are a means for knowledge represen- tation and reuse. They provide a shared understanding about a knowledge domain. EOS ex- tends the scope of ontologies by offering means to also formalize epistemological processes, i.e. guidelines for knowledge processing that may be employed in knowledge acquisition, generation and retrieval tasks. This general idea is molded into an EOS framework for epis- temological ontology-driven systems for knowledge processing. On this formal basis we will show how an actual EOS system can be designed, implemented and successfully put to work.
  • Imagination Bound: a Theoretical Imperative

    Imagination Bound: a Theoretical Imperative

    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Philosophy Philosophy 2016 Imagination Bound: A Theoretical Imperative Robert Michael Guerin University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2016.017 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Guerin, Robert Michael, "Imagination Bound: A Theoretical Imperative" (2016). Theses and Dissertations-- Philosophy. 8. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/philosophy_etds/8 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Philosophy by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I agree that the document mentioned above may be made available immediately for worldwide access unless an embargo applies.
  • A Conceptual Social Framework That Delivers KM Values to Corporate Organizations

    A Conceptual Social Framework That Delivers KM Values to Corporate Organizations

    EMSoD — A Conceptual Social Framework that Delivers KM Values to Corporate Organizations Christopher Adetunji, Leslie Carr Web Science Institute School of Electronics and Computer Science University of Southampton Southampton, England Email: fca6g14, [email protected] Abstract—As social software is becoming increasingly disruptive the Enterprise Mobility and Social [media] Data (EMSoD) to organizational structures and processes, Knowledge Manage- framework, our proposed conceptual social framework, with ment (KM) initiatives that have hitherto taken the form of a KM value at its core. We provide an overview of our previous ‘knowledge repository’ now need redefining. With the emergence work that culminates in an important measure of KM value of Social Media (SM) platforms like Twitter, the hierarchical — actionable knowledge — upon which a significant business boundaries within the organization are broken down and a lateral decision is made by a case study organization. This is un- flow of information is created. This has created a peculiar kind of tension between KM and SM, in which one is perceived as derpinned by the fact that the real essence of knowledge is its threatening the continued relevance of the other. Particularly, actionability, especially when it contributes to the advancement with the advances of social media and social software, KM is more of a proposed undertaking [3]. Measuring the value of such in need of delivering measurable value to corporate organizations, contributions has been one of the main issues of disagreement if it is to remain relevant in the strategic planning and positioning in Knowledge Management, which is why we devised a of organizations. In view of this, this paper presents EMSoD mechanism for measuring the KM value which our framework — Enterprise Mobility and Social Data — a conceptual social helps in delivering to corporate organizations.
  • The Concept of Information in Library Science, Sociology and Cognitive Science

    The Concept of Information in Library Science, Sociology and Cognitive Science

    The concept of information in Library Science, Sociology and Cognitive Science Jaime Ríos-Ortega * Paper submitted: Abstract January 30, 2013. Accepted: The term information has become and essential con- October 3, 2013. cept in the field of library science and associated dis- ciplines. The proper meaning of this term necessar- ily depends on epistemological context. Moreover, its intra-theoretical and polysemic potential has led the term to be used in multiples senses, ranging from the contexts of cognitive psychology to library science; however, the analysis offered herein underscores the need to define the term more precisely for use in li- brary science and associated fields, so that its meaning is neither degraded nor over-simplified when building useful explicative models. This paper also shows that the meaning of this term has tended to stabilize as re- * Institute of Library and Information Sciences of the UNAM. [email protected] INVESTIGACIÓN BIBLIOTECOLÓGICA, Vol. 28, No. 62, January/April, 2014, México, ISSN: 0187-358X. pp. 143-179 135 quired by theoretical models in which it is employed, 135-169 while as an isolated theoretical term it retains some de- pp. pp. gree of ambiguity. X, Keywords: Information; Library Science Theory; 0187-358 Information and Society. ISSN: ISSN: , México, México, , Resumen 2014 El concepto de información: dimensiones bibliote- cológica, sociológica y cognoscitiva , January/April, January/April, , 62 Jaime Ríos Ortega , No. 28 El término información se convirtió en un concepto Vol. , esencial para la bibliotecología y otras disciplinas af- ines. El significado adecuado de este vocablo depende necesariamente del contexto epistémico en que se uti- liza.
  • 272 Bibliography Abbreviations for Frequently Cited Works Analysis = Mill [1829] E&W = Bain [1859] EAP = Reid[1788/1969]

    272 Bibliography Abbreviations for Frequently Cited Works Analysis = Mill [1829] E&W = Bain [1859] EAP = Reid[1788/1969]

    Bibliography Abbreviations for Frequently Cited Works Analysis = Mill [1829] E&W = Bain [1859] EAP = Reid[1788/1969] EIP = Reid [1785/1969] First Enquiry = “An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding” in Hume [1777/1975] Inquiry = Reid [1764/1997] Lectures = Brown [1828/1860] or Hamilton [1844/1877] (sense obvious in context) Observations, OM = Hartley [1749/1966] S&I = Bain [1855] Sketch = Brown [1820/1977] SSR = Kuhn [1962/1970] Treatise = Hume [1739-1740/1978] Section I: Primary Sources Allen, Grant, Physiological Aesthetics [Garland Publishing, 1877]. Bain, Alexander, The Senses and the Intellect [University Publications of America, 1855/1977]. Bain, Alexander, The Emotions and the Will [University Publications of America, 1859/1977]. Bain, Alexander, “The Early Life of James Mill” in Mind, 1(1), pp.97-116 [1876a]. Bain, Alexander, “The Life of James Mill” in Mind, 1(4), pp.509-531 [1876b]. Bain, Alexander, James Mill: A Biography [Augustus M. Kelley, 1882a/1967]. Bain, Alexander, John Stuart Mill: A Criticism with Personal Reflections [Longmans, Green and Co., 1882b]. Bain, Alexander, Autobiography [1904]. Barzellotti, Giacomo, “Philosophy in Italy” in Mind, 3(12), pp.505-538 [1878]. Berkeley, George, A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, Jonathan Dancy, ed. [Oxford University Press, 1710/1998] Brown, Thomas, Lectures on the Philosophy of the Human Mind [Hallowell Glazer and Co., 1828]. 272 Brown, Thomas, Lectures on the Philosophy of the Human Mind [William Tegg, 1828/1860 (20th Edition)]. Brown, Thomas, Sketch of a System of the Philosophy of the Human Mind [1820], reprinted in Significant Contributions to the History of Psychology, Series A: Orientations, Volume I, Daniel N.
  • Ribes Bowker

    Ribes Bowker

    ARTICLE IN PRESS Information and Organization xxx (2009) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Information and Organization journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/infoandorg Between meaning and machine: Learning to represent the knowledge of communities David Ribes a,*, Geoffrey C. Bowker b a Georgetown University, Communication, Culture and Technology, 3520 Prospect St. NW, Suite 311, Washington, DC 20057, United States b Santa Clara University, Science Technology and Society, 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara, CA 95053, United States article info abstract Article history: Representing knowledge in codified forms is transformative of Received 4 June 2008 ones orientation to that knowledge. We trace the emergence of a Received in revised form 25 March 2009 routine for knowledge acquisition and its consequences for partic- Accepted 20 April 2009 ipants. Over time, participants in the earth science project GEON, Available online xxxx first learned about ontologies and then learned how to create them. We identify three steps in the routine: understanding the Keywords: Ontology development problematic of interoperability; learning the practice of knowledge Routine acquisition; and engaging the broader community. As participants Semantic interoperability traversed the routine they came to articulate, and then represent, Sociology of knowledge representation the knowledge of their communities. In a process we call reappre- Ethnography hension, traversing the routine also transformed participants’ ori- entation towards their data, knowledge and community, making them more keenly aware of the informational aspects of their fields. Ó 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Ontologies are an information technology for representing specialized knowledge in order to facil- itate communication across disciplines, share data or enable collaboration.
  • Stephen Pepper's World Hypotheses: Season 1, Episode 1 Welcome To

    Stephen Pepper's World Hypotheses: Season 1, Episode 1 Welcome To

    Stephen Pepper’s World Hypotheses: Season 1, Episode 1 Welcome to the first episode of the Stephen Pepper thread. The focus of this post is World Hypotheses, Chapters 1-4. My reflections today are largely confined to definitional matters, but I also hope to set the stage for an examination (in my next post) of Pepper’s “root metaphor” theory. Perhaps the clearest path into Pepper’s thought is to consider the place where most of us began our intellectual journey: common sense. For Pepper, common sense includes “the sorts of things we think of when we ordinarily read the papers…or the sort of things we see and hear and smell and feel as we walK along the street or in the country…” (p. 39). Pepper considers common sense as a loose synonym for Plato’s notion of “opinion” (p. 39). I’m also reminded of the “natural attitude” described by phenomenologists. For Pepper, the world of common sense can be characterized as “secure” in the sense that it is “never lacking” – i.e., we can always fall back on it: • “No cognition can sink lower than common sense, for when we completely give up trying to Know anything, then is precisely when we Know things in the common-sense way. In that lies the security of common sense” (p. 43). But, in spite of its security, common sense is also “cognitively irritable”: • “The materials of common sense are changing, unchanging, contradictory, vague, rigid, muddled, melodramatically clear, unorganized, rationalized, dogmatic, shrewdly dubious, recKlessly dubious, piously felt, playfully enjoyed, and so forth.
  • The Rationality Postulate in Economics: Its Ambiguity, Its Deficiency and Its Evolutionary Alternative

    The Rationality Postulate in Economics: Its Ambiguity, Its Deficiency and Its Evolutionary Alternative

    Walter Eucken Institut ORDO Constitutio in Libertate The Rationality Postulate in Economics: Its Ambiguity, its Deficiency and its Evolutionary Alternative Viktor J. Vanberg 03/3 Freiburger Diskussionspapiere zur Ordnungsökonomik Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics Institut für Allgemeine Wirtschaftsforschung Abteilung für Wirtschaftspolitik Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg i. Br. ISSN 1437-1510 The Rationality Postulate in Economics: Its Ambiguity, its Deficiency and its Evolutionary Alternative Viktor J. Vanberg 03/3 Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg und Walter Eucken Institut, Freiburg [email protected] Freiburger Diskussionspapiere zur Ordnungsökonomik Freiburg Discussionpapers on Constitutional Economics 03/3 ISSN 1437-1510 Walter Eucken Institut, Goethestr. 10, D-79100 Freiburg i. Br. Tel.Nr.: +49 +761 / 79097 0; Fax.Nr.: +49 +761 / 79097 97 http://www.walter-eucken-institut.de Institut für Allgemeine Wirtschaftsforschung; Abteilung für Wirtschaftspolitik; Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, D-79085 Freiburg i. Br. Tel.Nr.: +49 +761 / 203 2317; Fax.Nr.: +49 +761 / 203 2322 http://www.vwl.uni-freiburg.de/fakultaet/wipo/ The Rationality Postulate in Economics: Its Ambiguity, its ∗ Deficiency and its Evolutionary Alternative by Viktor J. Vanberg Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg Wirtschafts- und Verhaltenswissenschaftliche Fakultät Abteilung Wirtschaftspolitik und Walter Eucken Institut 1. Introduction 2. Rationality Principle vs. Rationality Hypotheses 3. Gary S. Becker’s Economic Approach to Human Behavior: Rationality Principle or Rationality Hypothesis? 4. The ‘Economic Approach’ Between Rationality Principle and Rationality Hypotheses 5. An Evolutionary Alternative to the Rational Choice Paradigm 6. J.H. Holland’s Theory of Rule-Based Adaptive Agents 7. Rationality and Markets 8. Conclusion Abstract: Though the rationality postulate is generally considered the paradigmatic core of economics, there is little agreement about its specific content and methodological status.
  • Kuhn Versus Lakatos, Or Paradigms Ver Su S Research Programmes in the History of Economics

    Kuhn Versus Lakatos, Or Paradigms Ver Su S Research Programmes in the History of Economics

    [HOPE Vol. 7 (1975) No. 41 Kuhn versus Lakatos, or paradigms ver su s research programmes in the history of economics Mark Blaug In the 1950’s and 1960’s economists learned their methodology from Popper. Not that many of them read Popper. Instead, they read Friedman, and perhaps few of them realized that Friedman is simply Popper-with-a-twist applied to economics. To be sure, Friedman was criticized, but the “Essay on the Methodology of Positive Economics” nevertheless survived to become the one arti- cle on methodology that virtually every economist has read at some stage in his career. The idea that unrealistic “assumptions” are nothing to worry about, provided that the theory deduced from them culminates in falsifiable predictions, carried conviction to economists long inclined by habit and tradition to take a purely instrumentalist view of their subject. All that is almost ancient history, however. The new wave is not Popper’s “falsifiability” but Kuhn’s “paradigms.” Again, it is un- likely that many economists read The Structure oj Scientific Revolu- tions (1962). Nevertheless, appeal to paradigmatic reasoning quickly became a regular feature of controversies in economics and “paradigm” is now the byword of every historian of economic thought.’ Recently, however, some commentators have expressed misgivings about Kuhnian methodology applied to economics, throw- ing doubt in particular on the view that “scientific revolutions” characterize the history of economic thought.* With these doubts I heartily concur. I will argue that the term “paradigm” ought to be banished from economic literature, unless surrounded by inverted commas. Suitably qualified, however, the term retains a function in the historical exposition of economic doctrines as a reminder of the Copyright 1976 by Mark Blaug MARKBLAUG is Head of the Research Unit in the Economics of Education at the University of London.
  • On First Understanding Plato's Republic

    On First Understanding Plato's Republic

    The European Journal of International Law Vol. 22 no. 4 © EJIL 2011; all rights reserved .......................................................................................... On First Understanding Plato’s Republic Philip Allott* Downloaded from A book can change a mind, but only if that mind is ready to be changed. The mind of a particular child formed, up to the age of reason, in a time of war, is liable to be ready to ask questions of a particular kind about the human condition – still more so, when, at http://ejil.oxfordjournals.org/ the age of eight, that child sees, on the front-page of the newspaper, images of Belsen and Hiroshima, images that would never be forgotten. In the 1940s it was still pos- sible to believe in childish innocence. Now even small children know too much about the worst that human beings can do. Beyond the age of reason, social influences interact with the particular character of our own mind and our own personal experience to form an ever-evolving idea, an ever-denser idea, of the human condition, forcing us to live our lives in an uncomfort- able reconciling of our own private worldview and the worldview imposed on us by by Robert Sedgwick on February 1, 2012 society. Books intrude into that process of self-evolving in a unique way. The private activity of other minds reaches far into our own mind through the very private activity of reading. Philosophy is an active presence in our minds, even in the minds of those who have never read a single sentence in a single book of philosophy.