Curriculum Vitae
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
John Stuart Mill's Sanction Utilitarianism
JOHN STUART MILL’S SANCTION UTILITARIANISM: A PHILOSOPHICAL AND HISTORICAL INTERPRETATION A Dissertation by DAVID EUGENE WRIGHT Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Linda Radzik Committee Members, Clare Palmer Scott Austin R.J.Q. Adams Head of Department, Gary Varner May 2014 Major Subject: Philosophy Copyright 2014 David Eugene Wright ABSTRACT This dissertation argues for a particular interpretation of John Stuart Mill’s utilitarianism, namely that Mill is best read as a sanction utilitarian. In general, scholars commonly interpret Mill as some type of act or rule utilitarian. In making their case for these interpretations, it is also common for scholars to use large portions of Mill’s Utilitarianism as the chief source of insight into his moral theory. By contrast, I argue that Utilitarianism is best read as an ecumenical text where Mill explains and defends the general tenets of utilitarianism rather than setting out his own preferred theory. The exception to this ecumenical approach to the text comes in the fifth chapter on justice which, I argue on textual and historical grounds, outlines the central features of Mill’s utilitarianism. With this understanding of Utilitarianism in place, many of the passages commonly cited in favor of the previous interpretations are rendered less plausible, and interpretations emphasizing Mill’s other writings are strengthened. Using this methodology, I critique four of the most prominent act or rule utilitarian interpretations of Mill’s moral theory. I then provide an interpretation of Mill’s theory of moral obligation and utilitarianism. -
Chad Van Schoelandt
CHAD VAN SCHOELANDT Tulane University Department of Philosophy, New Orleans, LA [email protected] Employment 2015-present Assistant Professor, Tulane University, Department of Philosophy 2016-present Affiliated Fellow, George Mason University, F. A. HayeK Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics Areas of Specialization Social and Political Philosophy Ethics Agency and Responsibility Philosophy, Politics & Economics Areas of Competence Applied Ethics (esp. Business, Environmental, Bio/Medical) History of Modern Philosophy Moral Psychology Education Ph.D., University of Arizona, Philosophy, 2015 M.A., University of Wisconsin - MilwauKee, Philosophy, 2010 B.A. (High Honors), University of California, Davis, Philosophy (political science minor), 2006 Publications Articles “Moral Accountability and Social Norms” Social Philosophy & Policy, Vol. 35, Issue 1, Spring 2018 “Consensus on What? Convergence for What? Four Models of Political Liberalism” (with Gerald Gaus) Ethics, Vol. 128, Issue 1, 2017: pp. 145-72 “Justification, Coercion, and the Place of Public Reason” Philosophical Studies, 172, 2015: pp. 1031-1050 “MarKets, Community, and Pluralism” The Philosophical Quarterly, Discussion, 64(254), 2014: pp. 144-151 "Political Liberalism, Ethos Justice, and Gender Equality" (with Blain Neufeld) Law and Philosophy 33(1), 2014: pp. 75-104 Chad Van Schoelandt CV Page 2 of 4 Book Chapters “A Public Reason Approach to Religious Exemption” Philosophy and Public Policy, Andrew I. Cohen (ed.), Rowman and Littlefield International, -
Cv Langsam.Pdf
CV Harold Langsam Professor of Philosophy Corcoran Department of Philosophy 120 Cocke Hall University of Virginia P.O. Box 400780 Charlottesville, VA 22904-4780 (434) 924-6920 (Office) (434) 979-2880 (Home) [email protected] Employment: Professor of Philosophy, University of Virginia (2011-) Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Virginia (2001-2011). Assistant Professor of Philosophy, University of Virginia (1994-2001). Mellon Postdoctoral Teaching and Research Fellow, Department of Philosophy, Cornell University (1994-95). Publications: Book The Wonder of Consciousness: Understanding the Mind through Philosophical Reflection (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2011). Reviews: Ethics and Medicine, Mind, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, Philosophical Quarterly Articles “McDowell’s Infallibilism and the Nature of Knowledge,” Synthese, http://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02682-4. “Why Intentionalism Cannot Explain Phenomenal Character,” Erkenntnis 85 (2020): 375-389. “Nietzsche and Value Creation: Subjectivism, Self-Expression, and Strength,” Inquiry 61 (2018): 100-113. “The Intuitive Case for Naïve Realism,” Philosophical Explorations 20 (2017): 106-122. “A Defense of McDowell’s Response to the Sceptic,” Acta Analytica 29 (2014): 43-59. “A Defense of Restricted Phenomenal Conservatism,” Philosophical Papers 42 (2013): 315-340. "Rationality, Justification, and the Internalism/Externalism Debate," Erkenntnis 68 (2008): 79- 101. "Why I Believe in an External World," Metaphilosophy 37 (2006): 652-672. "Consciousness, Experience, and Justification," Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (2002): 1- 28. "Externalism, Self-Knowledge, and Inner Observation," Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (2002): 42-61. "Strategy for Dualists," Metaphilosophy 32 (2001): 395-418. "Pain, Personal Identity, and the Deep Further Fact," Erkenntnis 54 (2001): 247-271. "Experiences, Thoughts, and Qualia," Philosophical Studies 99 (2000): 269-295. -
Davidson and Gadamer on Plato's Dialectical Ethics 67
Interpretation· Ways of Thinking about the Sciences and the Arts ED 1 TED BY Peter Machamer and Gereon Wolters University of Pittsburgh Press Contents Published by the University of Pittsburgh Preface Vll Press, Pittsburgh, Pa., 15260 All rights reserved 1 Some Cogitations on Interpretations 1 Manufactured in the United States of America Peter Machamer Printed on acid-free paper 10 9 8 7 6 54 3 2 1 2 The Logic of Interpretation 16 ISBN 13: 978-0-8229-4392-1 Ruth Lorand ISBN 10: 0-8229-4392-1 3 Interpretation as Cultural Orientation: 31 Remarks on Aesthetics Annemarie Gethmann-Siefert 4 Hermeneutics and Epistemology: 44 A Second Appraisal Heidegger, Kant, and Truth Paolo Parrini 5 Davidson and Gadamer on Plato's 66 Dialectical Ethics Kristin Gjesdal 6 The Interpretation of Philosophical 91 Texts Nicholas Rescher 7 The Explanation of Consciousness and 100 the Interpretation of Philosophical Texts Catherine Wilson 8 On Interpreting Leibniz's Mill 111 Andreas Blank v• Contents 9 How to Interpret Human Actions 130 (Including Moral Actions) Christoph Lumer Preface 10 Interpretive Practices in Medicine 158 Kenneth F. Schaffner Interpretation is an activity that cuts across the arts and sciences. Its 11 Interpreting Medicine: Forms of 179 ubiquity served as the motivation for making this colloquium all about Knowledge and Ways of Doing in interpretation. We sought to cover many aspects and domains in which Clinical Practice interpretive practices were found. So the essays collected here deal with Cornelius Borck the general nature of interpretation, with contrast or not between in terpretation and hermeneutics, with the interpretation of philosophi 12 Concept Formation via Hebbian 203 cal texts, of human action, in medicine, of the brain, and finally of Learning: The Special Case of wine. -
Mentor Bios 2013
Mentor Bios – 2013 Workshop Amy Allen is the Parents Distinguished Research Professor in the Humanities and Professor of Philosophy and Women's and Gender Studies at Dartmouth College. Her research interests are in Contemporary Continental Philosophy, social and political theory, and feminist theory. In particular, she works at the intersection of French poststructuralism, the Frankfurt School, and feminism on topics such as power, agency, subjectivity, autonomy, history and normativity. She is the author of two books: The Power of Feminist Theory: Domination, Resistance, Solidarity (1999) and The Politics of Our Selves: Power, Autonomy, and Gender in Contemporary Critical Theory (2008). She is the Co-Editor in Chief of the journal Constellations, series editor of the Columbia University Press book series New Directions in Critical Theory, and Executive Co-director of SPEP, the Society for Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy. Louise Antony is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. She received her B.A. from Syracuse University in 1975, and her Ph.D. from Harvard University in 1982. Prof. Antony has research interests in the philosophy of mind, naturalistic epistemology, feminist theory, and the philosophy of religion. She has edited or co-edited three volumes: A Mind of One’s Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity (with Charlotte Witt) and Chomsky and His Critics (with Norbert Hornstein), and Philosophers Without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular Life. She has contributed to the New York Times blog, “The Stone,” and to the popular website AskPhilosophers.org. Ann Cudd is University Distinguished Professor of Philosophy and Associate Dean for Humanities at the University of Kansas. -
Feminist Philosophy Comprehensive: Reading List
Feminist Philosophy Comprehensive: Reading List The main part of this list comprises readings that correspond to each of the five sections of the comprehensive exam. The Reference Books at the end of the list provide more background, but they are entirely optional. 1. Core Concepts a. Feminism Mill, J. S. “The Subjection of Women.” In Feminist Theory: A Philosophical Anthology. A. Cudd and R. Andreasen, eds. Malden, MA: Blackwell 2005: 17-26. de Beauvoir, S. “Introduction from The Second Sex.” In Cudd and Andreasen: 27-36. Truth, S. “Ar’n’t I a Woman?” In Theorizing Feminisms: A Reader. Ed. E. Hackett and S. Haslanger. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2006. 113. Tuana, N. ‘What is Feminist Philosophy?’ Philosophy in Multiple Voices. Ed. G. Yancy. Lanham MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007. Sherwin, S. “Understanding Feminism.” In her No Longer Patient: Feminist Ethics & Health Care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple, 1992. 13-34. b. Sex and Gender Butler, J. “Introduction: Acting in Concert.” In Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge, 2004. pp. 1-16. Fausto-Sterling, A. “The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female Are Not Enough,” The Sciences 33(2), 1993: 20-24. Garry, A. “Intersectionality, Metaphors, and the Multiplicity of Gender,” Hypatia, 26(4), 2011: 826–850. Haslanger, S. “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be?” Noûs 34(1), 2000: 31-55. Heyes, C. J. “Changing Race, Changing Sex: The Ethics of Self-Transformation,” Journal of Social Philosophy 37(2), 2006: 266-282. Jenkins, K. “Amelioration and Inclusion: Gender Identity and the Concept of Woman,” Ethics 126 (2016): 394–421. -
The Multidimensionality of Hermeneutic Phenomenology the Multidimensionality of Hermeneutic Phenomenology CONTRIBUTIONS to PHENOMENOLOGY
Contributions To Phenomenology 70 Babette Babich Dimitri Ginev Editors The Multidimensionality of Hermeneutic Phenomenology The Multidimensionality of Hermeneutic Phenomenology CONTRIBUTIONS TO PHENOMENOLOGY IN COOPERATION WITH THE CENTER FOR ADVANCED RESEARCH IN PHENOMENOLOGY Volume 70 Series Editors: Nicolas de Warren, Katholike Universiteit Leuven, Belgium Dermot Moran, University College Dublin Editorial Board: Lilian Alweiss, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland Elizabeth Behnke, Ferndale, WA, USA Michael Barber, St. Louis University, MO, USA Rudolf Bernet, Husserl-Archief, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium David Carr, Emory University, GA, USA Chan-Fai Cheung, Chinese University Hong Kong, China James Dodd, New School University, NY, USA Lester Embree, Florida Atlantic University, FL, USA Alfredo Ferrarin, Università di Pisa, Italy Burt Hopkins, Seattle University, WA, USA José Huertas-Jourda, Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada Kwok-Ying Lau, Chinese University Hong Kong, China Nam-In Lee, Seoul National University, Korea Dieter Lohmar, Universität zu Köln, Germany William R. McKenna, Miami University, OH, USA Algis Mickunas, Ohio University, OH, USA J.N. Mohanty, Temple University, PA, USA Junichi Murata, University of Tokyo, Japan Thomas Nenon, The University of Memphis, TN, USA Thomas M. Seebohm, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Germany Gail Soffer, Rome, Italy Anthony Steinbock, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, IL, USA Shigeru Taguchi, Yamagata University, Japan Dan Zahavi, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Richard M. Zaner, Vanderbilt University, TN, USA Scope The purpose of the series is to serve as a vehicle for the pursuit of phenomenological research across a broad spectrum, including cross-over developments with other fi elds of inquiry such as the social sciences and cognitive science. Since its establishment in 1987, Contributions to Phenomenology has published nearly 60 titles on diverse themes of phenomenological philosophy. -
The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy
The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy In cooperation with M. BRAINARD, Frankfurt • R. BRUZINA, Kentucky A. MICKUNAS, Ohio • T. SEEBOHM, Bonn T. SHEEHAN, Stanford edited by BURT HOPKINS STEVEN CROWELL 00 m - 2003 The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy General Editors Burt Hopkins, Seattle University Steven Crowell,Rice University Contributing Editors Marcus Brainard, Frankfurt/Main, Germany Ronald Bruzina, University o f Kentucky Algis Mickunas, Ohio University Thomas Seebohm, Bonn, Germany Thomas Sheehan, Stanford University Consulting Editors Pierre Adler, New York, New York Patrick Burke,Seattle University Damian Byers, Sydney, Australia Richard Cobb-Stevens,Boston College Natalie Depraz, University o f Paris IV (Sorbonne) John Drabinski, Grand Valley State University John J. Drummond, Fordham University R. O. Elveton, Carleton College Parvis Emad,La Crosse, Wisconsin Lester Embree, Florida Atlantic University Kathleen Haney, University o f Houston, D owntown James G. Hart, Indiana University Patrick Heelan, S.J., Georgetown University Nam-In Lee, Seoul National University, Korea Christian Lotz, University o f Kansas James Mensch, St. Francis Xavier University, Canada Dermot Moran, University College, Dublin, Ireland Harry Reeder, University o f Texas, Arlington James Risser, Seattle University Hans Ruin, Sodertom University College, Sweden Karl Schuhmannt, University o f Utrecht, Netherlands Marylou Sena, Seattle University Olav K.Wiegand, University o f Mainz, Germany Edith Wyschogrod, Rice University Dan Zahavi, Copenhagen, Denmark Copyright ®2003 by Taylor & Francis ISSN 1533-7472 ISBN 13: 978-0-9701679-3-4 (pbk) All rights reserved. No part of the material protected by this copyright may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, or by any infor mation storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the Publisher. -
The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy
The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy In cooperation with M. BRAINARD, Frankfurt • R. BRUZINA, Kentucky J. DRUMMOND, New York • A. MICKUNAS, Ohio T. SEEBOHM, Bonn • T. SHEEHAN, Stanford edited by BURT HOPKINS STEVEN CROWELL QQ IV - 2004 The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy General Editors Burt Hopkins, Seattle University Steven Crowell, Rice University Contributing Editors Marcus Brainard, Frankfurt/Main, Germany Ronald Bruzina, University o f Kentucky John J. Drummond, Fordham University Algis Mickunas, Ohio University Thomas Seebohm, Bonn, G erm any Thomas Sheehan, Stanford University Consulting Editors Pierre Adler, New York, New York Patrick Burke,Seattle University Damian Byers, Sydney, Australia Richard Cobb-Stevens, Boston College Natalie Depraz, University o f Paris IV (Sorbonne) John Drabinski, Grand Valley State U niversity R. O. Elveton, Carleton College Parvis Emad, La Crosse, Wisconsin Lester Embree, Florida Atlantic University Kathleen Haney, University o f Houston, Downtown James G. Hart, Indiana University Patrick Heelan, S.J., Georgetown University Friedrich Wilhelm von Herrmann, University o f Freiburg, Germany Nam-In Lee, Seoul National University, Korea Christian Lotz, U niversity o f Kansas James Mensch, St. Francis Xavier University, Canada Dermot Moran, University College, Dublin, Ireland Harry Reeder, U niversity o f Texas, A rlington James Risser, Seattle University Hans Ruin, Sodertorn University College, Sweden Karl Schuhmannt, University o f Utrecht, Netherlands Marylou Sena, Seattle University Nicolas de Warren, Wellesley College Olav K.Wiegand, University o f Mainz, Germany Edith Wyschogrod, Rice University Dan Zahavi, Copenhagen, Denmark Articles appearing in this journal are indexed in the Philosopher's Index. Copyright ®2004 by Taylor & Francis ISSN 1533-7472 ISBN 13: 978-0-9701679-4-1 (pbk) All rights reserved. -
The Golden Age of Phenomenology at the New School for Social Research, 1954–1973 CONTENTS
The Golden Age of Phenomenology at the New School for Social Research, 1954–1973 CONTENTS ................................... Preface xi Introduction Lester Embree 1 Part I: Teachers 1 Alfred Schutz Michael D. Barber: Schutz and the New School 41 Michael D. Barber: Unintended Consequences in Schutz 45 Alfred Schutz: Positivistic Philosophy and the Actual Approach of Interpretative Social Science 53 2 Dorion Cairns Lester Embree: Twenty Years at the New School and Before 80 Dorion Cairns: A One-Sided Interpretation of the Present Situation 91 3 Werner Marx Thomas M. Nenon: The Centrality of the New School for Werner Marx 99 Werner Marx: The “Need of Philosophy”—An Historical Reflexion 116 4 Aron Gurwitsch Richard M. Zaner: Gurwitsch at the New School 123 Aron Gurwitsch: On the Object of Thought: Methodological and Phenomenological Reflections 134 5 J. N. Mohanty J. N. Mohanty: How I Came to the New School 149 viii contents 6 Thomas M. Seebohm Thomas M. Seebohm: Memories 157 Thomas M. Seebohm: The Social Life-World and the Problem of History as a Human Science 159 Part II: Students 7 Maurice Natanson Michael D. Barber: Maurice Natanson and the New School 175 Michael D. Barber: The Blind Spots of Existentialism and The Erotic Bird 179 8 Thomas Luckmann Thomas Luckmann: A Circuitous Route to the New School 194 Thomas Luckmann: The Constitution of Language in the World of Everyday Life 200 9 Helmut Wagner George Psathas: Wagner and the New School 218 George Psathas: Helmut Wagner’s Contributions to the Social Sciences 221 10 Fred Kersten Fred Kersten: The New School 230 Fred Kersten: The Imaginational and the Actual 232 11 Richard M. -
Some Problems and Challenges in Gadamer's Hermeneutics
Between Enlightenment and Romanticism: Some Problems and Challenges in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics KRISTIN GJESDAL* for post-analytical philosophers such as Richard Rorty and John McDowell, Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Truth and Method (1960) has played an important role in their battles against Cartesian epistemology.1 In this context, it is little known that when Gadamer started working on Truth and Method in the early 1930s, he did not want only to criticize the framework of modern epistemology. Rather, the initial intention of his work was to “demonstrate that art can convey truth.”2 In Gadamer’s view, such a demonstration could not be of a merely systematic na- ture, but also had to engage with the historical development of aesthetics; it had to overcome the way in which Kant and the romantics had come to deny art any significance as knowledge. Since the publication of Truth and Method, Gadamer’s discussion of art and aesthetics—his critique of Kant, the romantics, and the general philosophical paradigm that he terms ‘aesthetic consciousness’—has received only scant atten- tion.3 By contrast, the second and third parts of the work—addressing, respectively, 1For Rorty’s reading of Gadamer, see Richard Rorty, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979), 357–95; and “Der Vorlesungsgast,” in Begegnungen mit Hans-Georg Gadamer, ed. Günter Figal, trans. Joachim Schulte (Stuttgart: Reclam, 2000), 87–92. For McDowell’s application of Gadamerian insights and concepts, see John McDowell, Mind and Nature (Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1996), xi–xxiv and 108–26; and “Gadamer, Davidson, and the Ground of Understanding,” in Gadamer’s Century: Essays in Honor of Hans-Georg Gadamer [Gadamer’s Century], ed. -
A Study of Hermeneutics in the Approach to Indian Philosophy in the West
A Study of Hermeneutics in the Approach to Indian Philosophy in the West Karin Elisabeth Mæland Thesis presented for the degree of Master in Philosophy Supervised by Ingvild Torsen and Kristin Gjesdal Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas University of Oslo June 2019 2 3 4 Acknowledgements I would like to offer thanks to my supervisors Ingvild Torsen and Kristin Gjesdal for generous support during the development of my thesis and constructive conversations on content and structure. I am thankful to Dr Vidwan Vijaya Kumar Manja, who introduced me to Indian philosophy and Sanskrit and guided me through in-depth studies; my friend and student fellow Aimée Povel for proof-reading my final thesis and for personal encouragement and support; and the various members of the faculty at IFIKK for contributing to my development as a scholar. 5 6 Abstract My thesis stems from the observation that there exists a problem of recognizing Indian thought as philosophy, and, by extension, including it in the field of academic philosophy in the West. The question I examine is regarding the role of hermeneutics in shaping the West’s image of Indian philosophy. As my point of departure, I use Friedrich Schlegel’s On the Language and Philosophy of the Indians as a case because it exemplifies an influential early Orientalist encounter with India. I examine the interpretive methodology in this text both in light of its historical-philosophical context and in light of the postcolonial debate, and identify limitations of the hermeneutical approach, both in terms of a misconstruction of Indian thought, and of maintaining an Orientalist misrepresentation.