DOCSLIB.ORG

NABS Biblio 2003

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NABS Biblio 2003 CURRENT AND SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHIES ON BENTHIC BIOLOGY 2003 Published September, 2004 2 FOREWORD “Current and Selected Bibliographies on Benthic Biology” is published annu- ally for the members of the North American Benthological Society, and summarizes titles of articles published during the previous year. Pertinent titles prior to that year are also included if they have not been cited in previous reviews. I wish to thank each of the members of the NABS Literature Review Committee for providing bibliographic information for the 2003 NABS BIBLIOGRAPHY. I would also like to thank Elizabeth Wohlgemuth, INHS Librarian, and library assis- tants Anna FitzSimmons, Jessica Beverly, and Elizabeth Day, for their assistance in putting the 2003 bibliography together. Membership in the North American Benthological Society may be obtained by contacting Ms. Lucinda B. Johnson, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota, 5013 Miller Trunk Highway, Duluth, MN 55811. Phone: 218/720-4251. email:[email protected]. Dr. Donald W. Webb, Editor NABS Bibliography Illinois Natural History Survey Center for Biodiversity 607 East Peabody Drive Champaign, IL 61820 217/333-6846 e-mail: [email protected] 3 CONTENTS PERIPHYTON: Christine L. Weilhoefer, Environmental Science and Resources, Portland State University, Portland, O97207 and Scott L. Rollins, Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.....................................................................................5 ANNELIDA (Oligochaeta, etc.): Mark J. Wetzel, Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820..................................................................................................................7 ANNELIDA (Hirudinea): Donald J. Klemm, Ecosystems Research Branch (MS-642), Ecological Exposure Research Division, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268-0001 and William E. Moser, Section of Invertebrate Zoology, Department of Systematic Biology, P.O. Box 37012, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, 10th & Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. 20013-7012.........................................................17 PLECOPTERA: Stanley W. Szczytko, College of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin Stevens Point, Stevens Point, WI 54481 and Bill P. Stark, Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi College, Clinton, MS 39058...........................................................................................18 EPHEMEROPTERA: Peter M. Grant, Department of Biological Sciences, Southwestern Oklahoma State University, Weatherford, OK 73096...............21 ODONATA: Kenneth J. Tennessen, 1949 Hickory Ave.Florence, AL 35630 ......26 TRICHOPTERA: Andrew P. Nimmo, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. T6G 2E3 ..........................................30 MEGALOPTERA: Parley V. Winger, USGS-Pautuxent Wildlife Research Center Athens, Warnell School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.............................................................................40 AQUATIC COLEOPTERA: Sharon Knight Jasper, School of Biological Sciences, Section of Integrative Biology, 141 Patterson Labs, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712-1064..................................41 DIPTERA: Ceratopogonidae: Donald W. Webb, Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, lL 61820................................................................................................................47 DIPTERA: Chironomidae: Donald W. Webb, Center for Biodiversity Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, lL 61820................................................................................................................50 DIPTERA: Other: Ben A. Foote, Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242...................................................................61 4 MOLLUSCA: Kevin S. Cummings, Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, 61820........................63 ACARINA: Thomas W. Simmons, and Preston R. Smith, Department of Biology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 114 Weyandt Hall, Indiana, PA 15705..........................................................................................................82 GENERAL AQUATIC ECOLOGY: Barry N. Brown, Science Librarian & Access Services Coordinator, Mansfield Library, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812........................................................................................85 MACROINVERTEBRATE TOXICOLOGY: Donald J. Klemm, Ecosystems Research Branch (MS-642), Ecological Exposure Research Division, National Exposure Res. Laboratory, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268-0001.................................................92 METHODS AND TECHNIQUES: Paul K. Sibley, Centre for Toxicology, Bovey Building, Gordon Street, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1...........................................................................................94 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS: Paul M. Kotila, Dean of Undergraduate Studies, Franklin Pierce College, 20 College Rd.,Rindge, NH 03461-0060.............................................................................................105 CONSERVATION BIOLOGY: Matthew E. Herbert, Department of Biology, Brooks 217, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48189..............................................................................................................112 Periphyton 5 Earl, S. R.; Blinn, D. W. 2003. Effects of wildfire ash on water Periphyton chemistry and biota in south-western U.S.A. streams. Freshwat. Christine L. Weilhoefer and Scott L. Rollins Biol. 48: 1015-1030. Edlund, M. B.; 2003. Freshwater Algae of North America: Ecology Alverson, A. J.; Manoylov, K. M.; Stevenson, R. J. 2003. Laboratory and Classification. J. Phycol. 39: 624-625. sources of error for algal community attributes during sample Elster, J.; Komarek, O. 2003. Ecology of periphyton in a meltwater preparation and counting. J. Appl. Phycol. 15: 357-369. stream in the maritime Antarctic. Antarct. Sci. 15: 189-201. Améziane, T.; Dauta, A.; Le Cohu, R. 2003. Origin and transport of Flegger, J. W.; Carmann, K. R.; Nisbet, R. M. 2003. Indirect effects phytoplankton in a large River: the Garonne, France. Arch. of contaminants in aquatic ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 317: Hydrobiol. 156: 385-404. 207-233. Artmann, U.; Waringer, J. A.; Schager, M. 2003. Seasonal dynamics Francoeur, S. H.; Espeland, E.M; Wetzel, R. G. 2003. Short-term of algal biomass and allochthonous input of coarse particulate effects of nitrogen and extracellular protease amendment on algal organic matter in a low-order sandstone stream (Weidlingbach, productivity in nitrogen-deprived periphyton. J. Freshw. Ecol. 18: lower Austria). Limnologica 33:77-91. 105-113. Azim, M. E.; Verdegem, M. C. J.; Mantingh, I.; van Dam, A. A.; Francoeur, S. H.; Wetzel, R. G. 2003. Regulation of periphytic leucine- Beveridge, M. C. M. 2003. Ingestion and utilization of periphyton aminopeptidase activity. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 31: 249-258. grown on artificial substrates by Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus Fuchs, S. A.; Hinch, S. G., Mellina, E. 2003. Effects of streamside L. Aquacult. Res. 34: 85-92. logging on stream macroinvertebrate communities and habitat in Azim, M. E.; Verdegem, M. C. J.; Singh, M.; van Dam, A. A.; the sub-boreal forests of British Columbia, Canada. Can. J. For. Beveridge, M. C. M. 2003. The effects of periphyton substrate Res. 33: 1408-1415. and fish stocking density on water quality, phytoplankton, Gausch, H.; Admiraal, W.; Sabater, S. 2003. Contrasting effects of periphyton and fish growth. Aquacult. Res. 34: 685-695. organic and inorganic toxicants on freshwater periphyton. Aquat. Barranguet, C.; van den Ende, F. P.; Rutgers, M.; Breure, A. M.; Toxicol. 64: 165-175. Greijdanus, M.; Sinke, J. J.; Admirall, W. 2003. Copper-induced Geddes, P.; Trexler, J. C. 2003. Uncoupling of omnivore-mediated modifications of the trophic relations in riverine algal-bacterial positive and negative effects on periphyton mats. Oecologia 136: biofilms. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 22: 1340-1349. 585-595. Blanck, H.; Admiraal, W.; Cleven, R. F. M. J.; Guasch, H.; van den Gold, C.; Feurtet-Mazel, A.; Coste, M.; Boudou, A. 2003. Effects of Hoop, M. A. G. T.; Ivorra, N.; Nystrom, B.; Paulsson, M.; Petterson, cadmium stress on periphytic diatom communities in indoor R. P.; Sabater, S.; Tubbing, G. M. J. 2003. Variability in zinc artificial streams. Freshwat. Biol. 48:316-328. tolerance, measured as incorporation of radio-labeled carbon Gol’d, Z. G.; Glushchenko, L. A.; Morozova, I. I.; Shulepina, S. P.; dioxide and thymidine, in periphyton communities sampled from Shadrin, I. A. 2003. Water quality assessment based on chemical 15 European river stretches. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 44: and biological characteristics: an example of classification of 17-29. characteristics for the Cheremushnyi creek-river water system. Borics, G.; Tothmeresz, B.; Grigorszky, I.; Padisak, J.; Varbiro, G.; Water Resour. 30: 304-314. Szabo, S. 2003. Algal assemblage types of bog-lakes in Hungary Gomez,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • British Museum (Natural History)
    Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Darwin's Insects Charles Darwin 's Entomological Notes Kenneth G. V. Smith (Editor) Historical series Vol 14 No 1 24 September 1987 The Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), instituted in 1949, is issued in four scientific series, Botany, Entomology, Geology (incorporating Mineralogy) and Zoology, and an Historical series. Papers in the Bulletin are primarily the results of research carried out on the unique and ever-growing collections of the Museum, both by the scientific staff of the Museum and by specialists from elsewhere who make use of the Museum's resources. Many of the papers are works of reference that will remain indispensable for years to come. Parts are published at irregular intervals as they become ready, each is complete in itself, available separately, and individually priced. Volumes contain about 300 pages and several volumes may appear within a calendar year. Subscriptions may be placed for one or more of the series on either an Annual or Per Volume basis. Prices vary according to the contents of the individual parts. Orders and enquiries should be sent to: Publications Sales, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, England. World List abbreviation: Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (hist. Ser.) © British Museum (Natural History), 1987 '""•-C-'- '.;.,, t •••v.'. ISSN 0068-2306 Historical series 0565 ISBN 09003 8 Vol 14 No. 1 pp 1-141 British Museum (Natural History) Cromwell Road London SW7 5BD Issued 24 September 1987 I Darwin's Insects Charles Darwin's Entomological Notes, with an introduction and comments by Kenneth G.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Species of Odonata in Europe
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228966602 Critical species of Odonata in Europe ARTICLE in INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ODONATOLOGY · JULY 2004 Impact Factor: 0.5 · DOI: 10.1080/13887890.2004.9748223 CITATIONS DOWNLOADS VIEWS 25 181 148 5 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Adolfo Cordero-Rivera University of Vigo 151 PUBLICATIONS 1,594 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Frank Suhling Technische Universität Braun… 79 PUBLICATIONS 793 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Available from: Frank Suhling Retrieved on: 13 September 2015 Guardians of the watershed. Global status of dragonflies: critical species, threat and conservation Critical species of Odonata in Europe Göran Sahlén 1, Rafal Bernard 2, Adolfo Cordero Rivera 3, Robert Ketelaar 4 & Frank Suhling 5 1 Ecology and Environmental Science, Halmstad University, P.O. Box 823, SE-30118 Halmstad, Sweden. <[email protected]> 2 Department of General Zoology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Fredry 10, PO-61-701 Poznan, Poland. <[email protected]> 3 Departamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía Animal, Universidade de Vigo, EUET Forestal, Campus Universitario, ES-36005 Pontevedra, Spain. <[email protected]> 4 Dutch Butterfly Conservation. Current address: Dutch Society for the Preservation of Nature, P.O. Box 494, NL-5613 CM, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. <[email protected]> 5 Institute of Geoecology, Dpt of Environmental System Analysis, Technical University of Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19c, D-38102 Braunschweig, Germany. <[email protected]> Key words: Odonata, dragonfly, IUCN, FFH directive, endemic species, threatened species, conservation, Europe. Abstract The status of the odonate fauna of Europe is fairly well known, but the current IUCN Red List presents only six species out of ca 130, two of which are actually out of danger today.
    [Show full text]
  • CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research
    CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research No. 25 ISSN 0172-1941 (printed) 1891-5426 (online) November 2012 CONTENTS Editorial: Inventories - What are they good for? 3 Dr. William P. Coffman: Celebrating 50 years of research on Chironomidae 4 Dear Sepp! 9 Dr. Marta Margreiter-Kownacka 14 Current Research Sharma, S. et al. Chironomidae (Diptera) in the Himalayan Lakes - A study of sub- fossil assemblages in the sediments of two high altitude lakes from Nepal 15 Krosch, M. et al. Non-destructive DNA extraction from Chironomidae, including fragile pupal exuviae, extends analysable collections and enhances vouchering 22 Martin, J. Kiefferulus barbitarsis (Kieffer, 1911) and Kiefferulus tainanus (Kieffer, 1912) are distinct species 28 Short Communications An easy to make and simple designed rearing apparatus for Chironomidae 33 Some proposed emendations to larval morphology terminology 35 Chironomids in Quaternary permafrost deposits in the Siberian Arctic 39 New books, resources and announcements 43 Finnish Chironomidae 47 Chironomini indet. (Paratendipes?) from La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. Photo by Carlos de la Rosa. CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research Editors Torbjørn EKREM, Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway Peter H. LANGTON, 16, Irish Society Court, Coleraine, Co. Londonderry, Northern Ireland BT52 1GX The CHIRONOMUS Newsletter on Chironomidae Research is devoted to all aspects of chironomid research and aims to be an updated news bulletin for the Chironomidae research community. The newsletter is published yearly in October/November, is open access, and can be downloaded free from this website: http:// www.ntnu.no/ojs/index.php/chironomus. Publisher is the Museum of Natural History and Archaeology at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim, Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • IDF-Report 86
    IDF International Dragonfly Fund - Report Journal of the International Dragonfly Fund 1-28 Oleg E. Kosterin On the Odonata of North Kazakhstan Province. I. First data on Petropavlovsk. Published: 10.10.2015 29-46 Oleg E. Kosterin Odonata registered on a short excursion to Kyshtovka District, Novosibirsk Province, Russia. Published: 21.10.2015 86 ISSN 1435-3393 The International Dragonfly Fund (IDF) is a scientific society founded in 1996 for the impro- vement of odonatological knowledge and the protection of species. Internet: http://www.dragonflyfund.org/ This series intends to publish studies promoted by IDF and to facilitate cost-efficient and ra- pid dissemination of odonatological data.. Editorial Work: Martin Schorr Layout: Martin Schorr IDF-home page: Holger Hunger Indexed: Zoological Record, Thomson Reuters, UK Printing: Colour Connection GmbH, Frankfurt Impressum: Publisher: International Dragonfly Fund e.V., Schulstr. 7B, 54314 Zerf, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Responsible editor: Martin Schorr Cover picture: Aristocypha fulgipennis, Cambodia, Ratanakiri Provi. 2/6/2013 Photographer: Oleg E. Kosterin Published 10.10.2015 On the Odonata of North Kazakhstan Province. I. First data on Petropavlovsk Oleg E. Kosterin Institute of Cytology & Genetics SB RAS, Acad. Lavrentyev ave. 10, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia; Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova str. 2, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The fauna of Odonata of the environs of Petropavlovsk, North Kazakhstan, was for the first time examined on two short trips in late June and mid August 2015. Thirty five species were revealed. Coenagrion ecornutum was recorded in Kazakhstan for the first time, Gomphus vulgatissimus the second time and Stylurus flavipes the third time.
    [Show full text]
  • HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN Green Bay and Gravel Island
    HABITAT MANAGEMENT PLAN Green Bay and Gravel Island National Wildlife Refuges October 2017 Habitat Management Plans provide long-term guidance for management decisions; set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes; and, identify the Fish and Wildlife Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes. The plans do not constitute a commitment for staffing increases, operational and maintenance increases, or funding for future land acquisition. The National Wildlife Refuge System, managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, is the world's premier system of public lands and waters set aside to conserve America's fish, wildlife, and plants. Since the designation of the first wildlife refuge in 1903, the System has grown to encompass more than 150 million acres, 556 national wildlife refuges and other units of the Refuge System, plus 38 wetland management districts. This page intentionally left blank. Habitat Management Plan for Green Bay and Gravel Island National Wildlife Refuges EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Habitat Management Plan (HMP) provides vision and specific guidance on enhancing and managing habitat for the resources of concern (ROC) at the refuge. The contributions of the refuge to ecosystem- and landscape-scale wildlife and biodiversity conservation, specifically migratory waterfowl, are incorporated into this HMP. The HMP is intended to provide habitat management direction for the next 15 years. The HMP is also needed to ensure that the refuge continues to conserve habitat for migratory birds in the context of climate change, which affects all units of the National Wildlife Refuge System.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedfordshire and Luton County Wildlife Sites
    Bedfordshire and Luton County Wildlife Sites Selection Guidelines VERSION 14 December 2020 BEDFORDSHIRE AND LUTON LOCAL SITES PARTNERSHIP 1 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 2. HISTORY OF THE CWS SYSTEM ......................................................................................................................... 7 3. CURRENT CWS SELECTION PROCESS ................................................................................................................ 8 4. Nature Conservation Review CRITERIA (modified version) ............................................................................. 10 5. GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY FACTORS ......................................................................................................... 14 6 SITE SELECTION THRESHOLDS........................................................................................................................ 15 BOUNDARIES (all CWS) ............................................................................................................................................ 15 WOODLAND, TREES and HEDGES ........................................................................................................................ 15 TRADITIONAL ORCHARDS AND FRUIT TREES ................................................................................................. 19 ARABLE FIELD MARGINS........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Seidenfaden Malaysia: 0.65 These Figures Are Surprisingly High, They Apply to Single Only. T
    BIOGEOGRAPHY OF MALESIAN ORCHIDACEAE 273 VIII. Biogeographyof Malesian Orchidaceae A. Schuiteman Rijksherbarium/Hortus Botanicus, P.O. Box 9514, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands INTRODUCTION The Orchidaceae outnumber far other in Malesia. At how- by any plant family present, accurate estimate of the of Malesian orchid is difficult to make. ever, an number species Subtracting the numberofestablishedsynonyms from the numberof names attributed to Malesian orchid species results in the staggering figure of 6414 species, with a retention of 0.74. This is ratio (ratio of ‘accepted’ species to heterotypic names) undoubtedly a overestimate, of the 209 Malesian orchid have been revised gross as most genera never their entire from availablerevisions estimate realis- over range. Extrapolating to a more tic retention ratio is problematic due to the small number of modern revisions and the different of treated. If look for Malesian of nature the groups we comparison at species wide ofretention ratios: some recently revised groups, we encounter a range Bulbophylluw sect. Uncifera (Vermeulen, 1993): 0.24 Dendrobium sect. Oxyglossum (Reeve & Woods, 1989): 0.24 Mediocalcar (Schuiteman, 1997): 0.29 Pholidota (De Vogel, 1988): 0.29 Bulbophyllum sect. Pelma (Vermeulen, 1993): 0.50 Paphiopedilum (Cribb, 1987, modified): 0.57 Dendrobium sect. Spatulata (Cribb, 1986, modified): 0.60. Correspondingly, we find a wide rangeof estimates for the ‘real’ numberof known Male- sian orchid species: from 2050 to 5125. Another approach would be to look at a single area, and to compute the retention ratio for the orchid flora of that area. If we do this for Java (mainly based on Comber, 1990), Peninsular Malaysia & Singapore (Seidenfaden & Wood, 1992) and Sumatra (J.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Global Terrorism 1999
    U.S. Department of State, April 2000 Introduction The US Government continues its commitment to use all tools necessary—including international diplomacy, law enforcement, intelligence collection and sharing, and military force—to counter current terrorist threats and hold terrorists accountable for past actions. Terrorists seek refuge in “swamps” where government control is weak or governments are sympathetic. We seek to drain these swamps. Through international and domestic legislation and strengthened law enforcement, the United States seeks to limit the room in which terrorists can move, plan, raise funds, and operate. Our goal is to eliminate terrorist safehavens, dry up their sources of revenue, break up their cells, disrupt their movements, and criminalize their behavior. We work closely with other countries to increase international political will to limit all aspects of terrorists’ efforts. US counterterrorist policies are tailored to combat what we believe to be the shifting trends in terrorism. One trend is the shift from well-organized, localized groups supported by state sponsors to loosely organized, international networks of terrorists. Such a network supported the failed attempt to smuggle explosives material and detonating devices into Seattle in December. With the decrease of state funding, these loosely networked individuals and groups have turned increasingly to other sources of funding, including private sponsorship, narcotrafficking, crime, and illegal trade. This shift parallels a change from primarily politically motivated terrorism to terrorism that is more religiously or ideologically motivated. Another trend is the shift eastward of the locus of terrorism from the Middle East to South Asia, specifically Afghanistan. As most Middle Eastern governments have strengthened their counterterrorist response, terrorists and their organizations have sought safehaven in areas where they can operate with impunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 1 Table 1. Current Taxonomic Keys and the Level of Taxonomy Routinely U
    Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Table 1. Current taxonomic keys and the level of taxonomy routinely used by the Ohio EPA in streams and rivers for various macroinvertebrate taxonomic classifications. Genera that are reasonably considered to be monotypic in Ohio are also listed. Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Species Pennak 1989, Thorp & Rogers 2016 Porifera If no gemmules are present identify to family (Spongillidae). Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Cnidaria monotypic genera: Cordylophora caspia and Craspedacusta sowerbii Platyhelminthes Class (Turbellaria) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nemertea Phylum (Nemertea) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Phylum (Nematomorpha) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nematomorpha Paragordius varius monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Ectoprocta monotypic genera: Cristatella mucedo, Hyalinella punctata, Lophopodella carteri, Paludicella articulata, Pectinatella magnifica, Pottsiella erecta Entoprocta Urnatella gracilis monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Polychaeta Class (Polychaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Annelida Oligochaeta Subclass (Oligochaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Hirudinida Species Klemm 1982, Klemm et al. 2015 Anostraca Species Thorp & Rogers 2016 Species (Lynceus Laevicaudata Thorp & Rogers 2016 brachyurus) Spinicaudata Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Williams 1972, Thorp & Rogers Isopoda Genus 2016 Holsinger 1972, Thorp & Rogers Amphipoda Genus 2016 Gammaridae: Gammarus Species Holsinger 1972 Crustacea monotypic genera: Apocorophium lacustre, Echinogammarus ischnus, Synurella dentata Species (Taphromysis Mysida Thorp & Rogers 2016 louisianae) Crocker & Barr 1968; Jezerinac 1993, 1995; Jezerinac & Thoma 1984; Taylor 2000; Thoma et al. Cambaridae Species 2005; Thoma & Stocker 2009; Crandall & De Grave 2017; Glon et al. 2018 Species (Palaemon Pennak 1989, Palaemonidae kadiakensis) Thorp & Rogers 2016 1 Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Informal grouping of the Arachnida Hydrachnidia Smith 2001 water mites Genus Morse et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 441: 63–90 (2014)Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland 63 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7461 CHECKLIST www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland Lauri Paasivirta1 1 Ruuhikoskenkatu 17 B 5, FI-24240 Salo, Finland Corresponding author: Lauri Paasivirta ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Kahanpää | Received 10 March 2014 | Accepted 26 August 2014 | Published 19 September 2014 http://zoobank.org/F3343ED1-AE2C-43B4-9BA1-029B5EC32763 Citation: Paasivirta L (2014) Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland. In: Kahanpää J, Salmela J (Eds) Checklist of the Diptera of Finland. ZooKeys 441: 63–90. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7461 Abstract A checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) recorded from Finland is presented. Keywords Finland, Chironomidae, species list, biodiversity, faunistics Introduction There are supposedly at least 15 000 species of chironomid midges in the world (Armitage et al. 1995, but see Pape et al. 2011) making it the largest family among the aquatic insects. The European chironomid fauna consists of 1262 species (Sæther and Spies 2013). In Finland, 780 species can be found, of which 37 are still undescribed (Paasivirta 2012). The species checklist written by B. Lindeberg on 23.10.1979 (Hackman 1980) included 409 chironomid species. Twenty of those species have been removed from the checklist due to various reasons. The total number of species increased in the 1980s to 570, mainly due to the identification work by me and J. Tuiskunen (Bergman and Jansson 1983, Tuiskunen and Lindeberg 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • A Genus-Level Supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 7 (2008) 255–269 www.elsevier.de/ode A genus-level supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G. Beutela,Ã, Ignacio Riberab, Olaf R.P. Bininda-Emondsa aInstitut fu¨r Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, FSU Jena, Germany bMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain Received 14 October 2005; accepted 17 May 2006 Abstract A supertree for Adephaga was reconstructed based on 43 independent source trees – including cladograms based on Hennigian and numerical cladistic analyses of morphological and molecular data – and on a backbone taxonomy. To overcome problems associated with both the size of the group and the comparative paucity of available information, our analysis was made at the genus level (requiring synonymizing taxa at different levels across the trees) and used Safe Taxonomic Reduction to remove especially poorly known species. The final supertree contained 401 genera, making it the most comprehensive phylogenetic estimate yet published for the group. Interrelationships among the families are well resolved. Gyrinidae constitute the basal sister group, Haliplidae appear as the sister taxon of Geadephaga+ Dytiscoidea, Noteridae are the sister group of the remaining Dytiscoidea, Amphizoidae and Aspidytidae are sister groups, and Hygrobiidae forms a clade with Dytiscidae. Resolution within the species-rich Dytiscidae is generally high, but some relations remain unclear. Trachypachidae are the sister group of Carabidae (including Rhysodidae), in contrast to a proposed sister-group relationship between Trachypachidae and Dytiscoidea. Carabidae are only monophyletic with the inclusion of a non-monophyletic Rhysodidae, but resolution within this megadiverse group is generally low. Non-monophyly of Rhysodidae is extremely unlikely from a morphological point of view, and this group remains the greatest enigma in adephagan systematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]