The Emission Probabilities of Long Range Alpha Particles from Even-Even 244-252 Cm Isotopes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Basics of Radiation Radiation Safety Orientation Open Source Booklet 1 (June 1, 2018)
Basics of Radiation Radiation Safety Orientation Open Source Booklet 1 (June 1, 2018) Before working with radioactive material, it is helpful to recall… Radiation is energy released from a source. • Light is a familiar example of energy traveling some distance from its source. We understand that a light bulb can remain in one place and the light can move toward us to be detected by our eyes. • The Electromagnetic Spectrum is the entire range of wavelengths or frequencies of electromagnetic radiation extending from gamma rays to the longest radio waves and includes visible light. Radioactive materials release energy with enough power to cause ionizations and are on the high end of the electromagnetic spectrum. • Although our bodies cannot sense ionizing radiation, it is helpful to think ionizing radiation behaves similarly to light. o Travels in straight lines with decreasing intensity farther away from the source o May be reflected off certain surfaces (but not all) o Absorbed when interacting with materials You will be using radioactive material that releases energy in the form of ionizing radiation. Knowing about the basics of radiation will help you understand how to work safely with radioactive material. What is “ionizing radiation”? • Ionizing radiation is energy with enough power to remove tightly bound electrons from the orbit of an atom, causing the atom to become charged or ionized. • The charged atoms can damage the internal structures of living cells. The material near the charged atom absorbs the energy causing chemical bonds to break. Are all radioactive materials the same? No, not all radioactive materials are the same. -
NATO and NATO-Russia Nuclear Terms and Definitions
NATO/RUSSIA UNCLASSIFIED PART 1 PART 1 Nuclear Terms and Definitions in English APPENDIX 1 NATO and NATO-Russia Nuclear Terms and Definitions APPENDIX 2 Non-NATO Nuclear Terms and Definitions APPENDIX 3 Definitions of Nuclear Forces NATO/RUSSIA UNCLASSIFIED 1-1 2007 NATO/RUSSIA UNCLASSIFIED PART 1 NATO and NATO-Russia Nuclear Terms and Definitions APPENDIX 1 Source References: AAP-6 : NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions AAP-21 : NATO Glossary of NBC Terms and Definitions CP&MT : NATO-Russia Glossary of Contemporary Political and Military Terms A active decontamination alpha particle A nuclear particle emitted by heavy radionuclides in the process of The employment of chemical, biological or mechanical processes decay. Alpha particles have a range of a few centimetres in air and to remove or neutralise chemical, biological or radioactive will not penetrate clothing or the unbroken skin but inhalation or materials. (AAP-21). ingestion will result in an enduring hazard to health (AAP-21). décontamination active активное обеззараживание particule alpha альфа-частицы active material antimissile system Material, such as plutonium and certain isotopes of uranium, The basic armament of missile defence systems, designed to which is capable of supporting a fission chain reaction (AAP-6). destroy ballistic and cruise missiles and their warheads. It includes See also fissile material. antimissile missiles, launchers, automated detection and matière fissile радиоактивное вещество identification, antimissile missile tracking and guidance, and main command posts with a range of computer and communications acute radiation dose equipment. They can be subdivided into short, medium and long- The total ionising radiation dose received at one time and over a range missile defence systems (CP&MT). -
Radiation Basics
Environmental Impact Statement for Remediation of Area IV \'- f Susana Field Laboratory .A . &at is radiation? Ra - -.. - -. - - . known as ionizing radiatios bScause it can produce charged.. particles (ions)..- in matter. .-- . 'I" . .. .. .. .- . - .- . -- . .-- - .. What is radioactivity? Radioactivity is produced by the process of radioactive atmi trying to become stable. Radiation is emitted in the process. In the United State! Radioactive radioactivity is measured in units of curies. Smaller fractions of the curie are the millicurie (111,000 curie), the microcurie (111,000,000 curie), and the picocurie (1/1,000,000 microcurie). Particle What is radioactive material? Radioactive material is any material containing unstable atoms that emit radiation. What are the four basic types of ionizing radiation? Aluminum Leadl Paper foil Concrete Adphaparticles-Alpha particles consist of two protons and two neutrons. They can travel only a few centimeters in air and can be stopped easily by a sheet of paper or by the skin's surface. Betaparticles-Beta articles are smaller and lighter than alpha particles and have the mass of a single electron. A high-energy beta particle can travel a few meters in the air. Beta particles can pass through a sheet of paper, but may be stopped by a thin sheet of aluminum foil or glass. Gamma rays-Gamma rays (and x-rays), unlike alpha or beta particles, are waves of pure energy. Gamma radiation is very penetrating and can travel several hundred feet in air. Gamma radiation requires a thick wall of concrete, lead, or steel to stop it. Neutrons-A neutron is an atomic particle that has about one-quarter the weight of an alpha particle. -
MIRD Pamphlet No. 22 - Radiobiology and Dosimetry of Alpha- Particle Emitters for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy
Alpha-Particle Emitter Dosimetry MIRD Pamphlet No. 22 - Radiobiology and Dosimetry of Alpha- Particle Emitters for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy George Sgouros1, John C. Roeske2, Michael R. McDevitt3, Stig Palm4, Barry J. Allen5, Darrell R. Fisher6, A. Bertrand Brill7, Hong Song1, Roger W. Howell8, Gamal Akabani9 1Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore MD 2Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood IL 3Medicine and Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York NY 4International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria 5Centre for Experimental Radiation Oncology, St. George Cancer Centre, Kagarah, Australia 6Radioisotopes Program, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland WA 7Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN 8Division of Radiation Research, Department of Radiology, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark NJ 9Food and Drug Administration, Rockville MD In collaboration with the SNM MIRD Committee: Wesley E. Bolch, A Bertrand Brill, Darrell R. Fisher, Roger W. Howell, Ruby F. Meredith, George Sgouros (Chairman), Barry W. Wessels, Pat B. Zanzonico Correspondence and reprint requests to: George Sgouros, Ph.D. Department of Radiology and Radiological Science CRB II 4M61 / 1550 Orleans St Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine Baltimore MD 21231 410 614 0116 (voice); 413 487-3753 (FAX) [email protected] (e-mail) - 1 - Alpha-Particle Emitter Dosimetry INDEX A B S T R A C T......................................................................................................................... -
Interim Guidelines for Hospital Response to Mass Casualties from a Radiological Incident December 2003
Interim Guidelines for Hospital Response to Mass Casualties from a Radiological Incident December 2003 Prepared by James M. Smith, Ph.D. Marie A. Spano, M.S. Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health Summary On September 11, 2001, U.S. symbols of economic growth and military prowess were attacked and thousands of innocent lives were lost. These tragic events exposed our nation’s vulnerability to attack and heightened our awareness of potential threats. Further examination of the capabilities of foreign nations indicate that terrorist groups worldwide have access to information on the development of radiological weapons and the potential to acquire the raw materials necessary to build such weapons. The looming threat of attack has highlighted the vital role that public health agencies play in our nation’s response to terrorist incidents. Such agencies are responsible for detecting what agent was used (chemical, biological, radiological), event surveillance, distribution of necessary medical supplies, assistance with emergency medical response, and treatment guidance. In the event of a terrorist attack involving nuclear or radiological agents, it is one of CDC’s missions to insure that our nation is well prepared to respond. In an effort to fulfill this goal, CDC, in collaboration with representatives of local and state health and radiation protection departments and many medical and radiological professional organizations, has identified practical strategies that hospitals can refer -
Low-Energy Nuclear Physics Part 2: Low-Energy Nuclear Physics
BNL-113453-2017-JA White paper on nuclear astrophysics and low-energy nuclear physics Part 2: Low-energy nuclear physics Mark A. Riley, Charlotte Elster, Joe Carlson, Michael P. Carpenter, Richard Casten, Paul Fallon, Alexandra Gade, Carl Gross, Gaute Hagen, Anna C. Hayes, Douglas W. Higinbotham, Calvin R. Howell, Charles J. Horowitz, Kate L. Jones, Filip G. Kondev, Suzanne Lapi, Augusto Macchiavelli, Elizabeth A. McCutchen, Joe Natowitz, Witold Nazarewicz, Thomas Papenbrock, Sanjay Reddy, Martin J. Savage, Guy Savard, Bradley M. Sherrill, Lee G. Sobotka, Mark A. Stoyer, M. Betty Tsang, Kai Vetter, Ingo Wiedenhoever, Alan H. Wuosmaa, Sherry Yennello Submitted to Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics January 13, 2017 National Nuclear Data Center Brookhaven National Laboratory U.S. Department of Energy USDOE Office of Science (SC), Nuclear Physics (NP) (SC-26) Notice: This manuscript has been authored by employees of Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC under Contract No.DE-SC0012704 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The publisher by accepting the manuscript for publication acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. -
The Saclay Nuclear Physics Division by Nicolas Alamanos
GNPN Ediboard.fm Page 1 Thursday, August 11, 2005 11:59 AM Nuclear Physics Nuclear Physics News is published on behalf of the Nuclear Physics European Collaboration Committee (NuPECC), an Expert Committee of the European Science Foundation, with colleagues from Europe, News America, and Asia. Volume 15/No. 3 Editor: Gabriele-Elisabeth Kömer Editorial Board J. D’Auria, Vancouver W. Kutschera, Vienna R. F. Casten, Yale M. Leino, Jyväskylä T. W. Donnelly, MIT Cambridge R. Lovas, Debrecen A. Eiró, Lisbon S. Nagamiya, Tsukuba M. Huyse, Leuven (Chairman) C. Trautmann, Darmstadt Editorial Office: Physikdepartment, E12, Technische Universitat München, 85748 Garching, Germany, Tel: +49 89 2891 2293, +49 172 89 15011, Fax: +49 89 2891 2298, E-mail: [email protected] Correspondents Argentina: O. Civitaresse, La Plata; Australia: A. W. Thomas, Adelaide; Austria: H. Oberhummer, Vienna; Belgium: C. Angulo, Lauvain-la-Neuve; Brasil: M. Hussein, São Paulo; Bulgaria: D. Balabanski, Sofia; Canada: J.-M. Poutissou, TRIUMF; K, Sharma, Manitobu; C. Svensson, Guelph: China: W. Zhan, Lanzhou; Croatia: R. Calpar, Zagreb; Czech Republic: J. Kvasil, Prague; Slovak Republic: P. Povinec, Bratislava; Denmark: K. Riisager, Årnus; Finland: M. Leino, Jyväskylä; France: G. De France, GANIL Caen; B. Blank, Bordeaux; M Guidal, IPN Orsay; Germany: K. D. Gross, GSI Darmstadi; K. Kilian Jülich; K. Lieb, Göttingen; Greece: E. Mavromatis, Athens; Hungary: B. M. Nyakó, Debrecen; India: D. K. Avasthi, New Delhi; Israel: N. Auerbach, Tel Aviv; Italy: E. Vercellin, Torino; M. Ripani, Genova; L. Corradi, Legnaro; D. Vinciguerra, Catania; Japan: T. Motobayashi, RIKEN; H. Toki, Osaka; Malta: G. Buttigieg, Kalkara; Mexico: J. Hirsch, Mexico DF; Netherlands: G. -
Spectroscopy of Neutron-Rich Nuclei Produced in the Spontaneous
Sp ectroscopy of NeutronRich Nuclei Pro duced in the Sp ontaneous Fission of Cf by Michael Wilhelm Simon Submitted in Partial Fulllment of the Requirements for the Degree Do ctor of Philosophy Sup ervised by Professor Douglas Cline Department of Physics and Astronomy The College Arts and Sciences University of Ro chester Ro chester New York ii To myParents iii Curriculum Vitae The author was b orn in San Diego California on Octob er He attended the University of California Berkeley from to and worked at the UCB Earthquake Engineering Research Center and Fire Research Lab oratory from to He attended San Francisco State University from to and graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in Physics in During his enrollmenthe per formed research on sup erconducting tunnel junctions under the direction of Professor Roger Bland He entered the graduate physics program at the UniversityofRochester in the fall of He was awarded the Graduate Student Teaching Award in and received the Master of Arts degree in Physics in His dissertation research was carried out at the Nuclear Structure Research Lab oratory under the direction of Professor Douglas Cline iv Acknowledgments The research presented in this thesis represents not only my eort but also the contributions of many p eople I would liketoextend thanks to all those involved Iwould like to thank rst my advisor Dr Douglas Cline for his continued supp ort and encouragement Iwould also like to thank Dr ChingYen Wu for his a continued interest in this work and for innumerable useful discussions -
A Critical Review of Alpha Radionuclide Therapy—How to Deal with Recoiling Daughters?
Pharmaceuticals 2015, 8, 321-336; doi:10.3390/ph8020321 OPEN ACCESS pharmaceuticals ISSN 1424-8247 www.mdpi.com/journal/pharmaceuticals Review A Critical Review of Alpha Radionuclide Therapy—How to Deal with Recoiling Daughters? Robin M. de Kruijff, Hubert T. Wolterbeek and Antonia G. Denkova * Radiation Science and Technology, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 15, 2629 JB Delft, The Netherlands; E-Mails: [email protected] (R.M.K.); [email protected] (H.T.W.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +31-15-27-84471. Academic Editor: Svend Borup Jensen Received: 15 April 2015 / Accepted: 1 June 2015 / Published: 10 June 2015 Abstract: This review presents an overview of the successes and challenges currently faced in alpha radionuclide therapy. Alpha particles have an advantage in killing tumour cells as compared to beta or gamma radiation due to their short penetration depth and high linear energy transfer (LET). Touching briefly on the clinical successes of radionuclides emitting only one alpha particle, the main focus of this article lies on those alpha-emitting radionuclides with multiple alpha-emitting daughters in their decay chain. While having the advantage of longer half-lives, the recoiled daughters of radionuclides like 224Ra (radium), 223Ra, and 225Ac (actinium) can do significant damage to healthy tissue when not retained at the tumour site. Three different approaches to deal with this problem are discussed: encapsulation in a nano-carrier, fast uptake of the alpha emitting radionuclides in tumour cells, and local administration. Each approach has been shown to have its advantages and disadvantages, but when larger activities need to be used clinically, nano-carriers appear to be the most promising solution for reducing toxic effects, provided there is no accumulation in healthy tissue. -
Radiological Information
RADIOLOGICAL INFORMATION Frequently Asked Questions Radiation Information A. Radiation Basics 1. What is radiation? Radiation is a form of energy. It is all around us. It is a type of energy in the form of particles or electromagnetic rays that are given off by atoms. The type of radiation we are concerned with, during radiation incidents, is “ionizing radiation”. Radiation is colorless, odorless, tasteless, and invisible. 2. What is radioactivity? It is the process of emission of radiation from a material. 3. What is ionizing radiation? It is a type of radiation that has enough energy to break chemical bonds (knocking out electrons). 4. What is non-ionizing radiation? Non-ionizing radiation is a type of radiation that has a long wavelength. Long wavelength radiations do not have enough energy to "ionize" materials (knock out electrons). Some types of non-ionizing radiation sources include radio waves, microwaves produced by cellular phones, microwaves from microwave ovens and radiation given off by television sets. 5. What types of ionizing radiation are there? Three different kinds of ionizing radiation are emitted from radioactive materials: alpha (helium nuclei); beta (usually electrons); x-rays; and gamma (high energy, short wave length light). • Alpha particles stop in a few inches of air, or a thin sheet of cloth or even paper. Alpha emitting materials pose serious health dangers primarily if they are inhaled. • Beta particles are easily stopped by aluminum foil or human skin. Unless Beta particles are ingested or inhaled they usually pose little danger to people. • Gamma photons/rays and x-rays are very penetrating. -
3. Particles Or Waves? Strange Laws at the Heart of Matter
3. Particles or waves? Strange laws at the heart of matter Television news items or films sometimes show someone using a Geiger counter… maybe a prospector is searching for uranium, or perhaps a hospital worker is accounting for vital radioactive materials used to treat cancer. Geiger counters are particle detectors that make a characteristic clicking sound every time a high energy particle enters. Click – one particle; click – another particle. It is known that X-rays are emitted by electrons in the atom, whereas gamma rays, electromagnetic radiation of an even higher energy, are emitted from within the atomic nucleus. The clicking of a Geiger counter is a sign of quantum weirdness – the gamma ray waves are behaving as particles. In the same way that particles like electrons can sometimes behave as waves (we have mentioned how the wave properties of electrons allow us to study the structure of matter), all electromagnetic waves can occasionally act as particles. Every type of particle has a name, and particles of light are called photons. All electromagnetic waves, whether they are gamma rays, X-rays, visible, ultraviolet light, or radio waves, consist of photons. Another important property of electromagnetic waves is that, unlike other forms of waves such as sound, they do not need a medium to carry them. Sound waves require air to travel through, but all forms of light can propagate through empty space. It is because photons happily travel in the near vacuum of space that the radiation emitted by the Sun can heat the Earth. J. L. Cassingham with one of his company's Geiger counters, featured in an advertisement from 1955. -
Fission Involves a New State of Nuclear Matter
1, Fissioninvolves a new state of nuclearmatter C.YTHIER, S. HACHEMand G. MOUZE Faculté des Sciences, 06108 Nice cedex 2, France PACS25.85.-w - Fissionreactions PACS25.70 Jj - Fusionand fusion-fission reactions PACS 21.60 Gx - Clustermodel Abstract-The rearrangementstep of nuclearfission occurs within 0.17 yoctosecond, in a new state of nuclearmatter characterized by the formationof closed shellsof nucleons.The determinationof its lifetimeis now based on the prompt neutron emissionlaw. The width of isotopicdistributions measures the uncertaintyin the neutronnumber of the fragments.Magic mass numbers,82 and 126,play a major role in the mass distributions.Arguments are presentedin favourof an all-neutron state. The boson field responsiblefor the new collectiveinteraction has to be searchedfor. Introduction. - An overallpicture of our modelof binarynuclear fission was recently givenby R.A.Ricci in EurophysicsNews [1]. But seeing that F. Gônnenweindoes not believe[2] that fission occurs within 1.7 10-2ss,we willfirst try to justifythat this holds for all the fissioningsystems considered by J. Terrellin his work on promptneutron "nucleon emission[3], and thenwe willtry to showthat the ideaof closed shells"was alreadycontained in anotherpaper by J. Terrell t4l and can explainthe mass distributionsof binaryfission. Fission occurs within 0.17 yoctosecond-In 1957,J. Terrellshowed that the probabilityP(u) of emittingv neutronsper fission,represented as functionof the - difference(v v), where7 is the averagenumber of neutronsemitted per fission, is a Gaussiancurve having a o - parameterof 1.08, or a full-width-at-half-maximumof 2'538 neutrons.Indeed, the data obtainedf rom the followingspontaneously 238'240'242Pu,2a2'2aaç^ 252Cf 233,235U zssp, fissioning nuclei, and and from and irradiatedwith B0 keV neutrons, were perfectly fitted by such a curve, as demonstratedby his figure4 [3],reproduced in manytextbooks, e.g.