DOCSLIB.ORG

Managing Budget Cutbacks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Managing Budget Cutbacks MANAGING BUDGET CUTBACKS by Robert W. Tobin Kenneth G. Pankey, Jr. March 1994 National Center for State Courts State Justice Institute ©1994 National Center for State Courts ISBN 0-89656-139-9 National Center Publication Number R-160 This Report was developed under Grant SJI-93-05C-B-017 from the State Justice Institute. Points of view expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the State Justice Institute ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report is one of a series of reports that are designed to elaborate and expand upon sections of the NACM Trial Court Financial Management Guide. A special acknowledgment is due the National Association for Court Management which has promoted and supported the effort to provide useful management materials. This report was made possible by the cooperation and assistance of many persons who took the time to coordinate site visits, to provide information, and to review drafts. Editorial comment on the main body of the report was provided by Sally Hillsman, Vice President, Research, National Center for State Courts. Gene Flango and Bill Hewitt of the National Center provided information on research reports which relate to this project. Alex Aikman of the National Center provided comment on Appendix J, Total Quality Management/Reinventing Government: Relevance to Court Administration. Production assistance was provided by Bill Fishback, Stevalynn Adams, Mary McCall, and Joe Kueser of the National Center. The cooperation was excellent at each of the sites visited by the staff. These visits were coordinated through the chief executive officer of the court and normally involved interviews with the chief executive officer, various members of his or her staff, officials of the other branches, and judges exercising administrative functions. We extend our thanks to all persons who took time to provide us with information and to review our work. We particularly thank the managers who bore the brunt of our visit and the administrative judges under whose aegis we operated. North Dakota The Honorable Gerald W. VandeWalle, Chief Justice; the Honorable Ralph Erikstad, Chief Justice (retired); Keithe Nelson, State Court Administrator. Maine The Honorable Daniel E. Wathen, Chief Justice; James T. Glessner, State Court Administrator; Robert Freeman, Deputy State Court Administrator. 19th Judicial Circuit, Illinois (Lake County) The Honorable John A. Goshgarian, Chief Judge; Robert A. Zastany, Court Administrator. iii iv • Managing Budget Cutbacks First Judicial District, Pennsylvania, (Philadelphia) Dr. Geoff Gallas, Executive Administrator. Connecticut Judicial Department The Honorable Ellen Ash Peters, Chief Justice; The Honorable Aaron Ment, Chief Court Administrator; James O. Cavanaugh, Executive Director, Administrative Services; Joseph D. D'Alesio, Esq., Director of Operations, Superior Court. Sacramento County, California (Superior and Municipal Courts) The Honorable Roger K. Warren, Presiding Judge; Dennis B. Jones, Court Executive Officer; Charles H. Robuck, Administrative Services Officer. Ventura County, California The Honorable Steven Z. Perren, Presiding Judge, Ventura Superior Court; the Honorable Bruce A. Clark, Presiding Judge, Ventura Municipal Court; Sheila Gonzalez, Executive Officer/Jury Commissioner, Ventura Superior and Municipal Courts; Vince Ordoñez, Jr., Assistant Executive Officer; Florence Prushan, Assistant Executive Officer. Broward County, Florida (17th Judicial Circuit) The Honorable Dale Ross, Chief Judge; Carol Lee Ortman, Court Administrator; Thomas Furst, Deputy Court Administrator; Cheryl Anderson, Deputy Court Administrator. Special thanks go to Brian Lynch who, as a National Center employee, conceived the idea for the project and who returned as a consultant to assist the project in its early stages. Robert W. Tobin, Project Director Kenneth G. Pankey, Jr. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgments.............................................................................................................................. iii Summary of Findings and Conclusions .............................................................................................ix Introduction: Goals, Methodology, and Products.............................................................................. 1 A. Goals...................................................................................................................................... 1 B. Advisory Committee.............................................................................................................. 1 C. Project Methodology ............................................................................................................. 1 1. Site Visits.......................................................................................................................... 2 2. COSCA Survey ................................................................................................................. 3 3. Application of Financial Management Innovations to Courts .......................................... 4 4. Bibliography..................................................................................................................... 4 D. Report Description................................................................................................................. 4 E. Appendices............................................................................................................................. 4 Part I: Prospects for Funding State Courts in the 90s ........................................................................ 6 A. Overview ............................................................................................................................... 6 B. Indicators of State Financial Condition ................................................................................. 6 1. Year-End Balances............................................................................................................ 6 2. Expenditure Growth..........................................................................................................7 3. Expenditure Policies ......................................................................................................... 8 4. Revenue............................................................................................................................ 9 C. Summary................................................................................................................................ 10 Part II: Approaches to Cutback Management .................................................................................... 11 A. Overview ............................................................................................................................... 11 v vi • Managing Budget Cutbacks B. Fundamental Changes................................................................................................................ 11 1. Changes in the Organizational and Geographical Configuration of Courts.......................... 11 a. The New Push for Unification................................................................................... 11 b. Unification Experience at Project Sites..................................................................... 12 c. Organizational Unification and Efficiency................................................................ 13 d. Geographic Unification............................................................................................. 16 2. Changes in Interbranch Relations.......................................................................................... 17 3. Management Style, the Public Sector Entrepreneur.............................................................. 19 4. Changing Judicial Roles........................................................................................................ 20 5. Alternative Means of Financing Court Operations................................................................ 21 a. Funding of Educational and Rehabilitative Programs for Substance Abusers and Errant Drivers....................................................................... 23 b. Fees for Probation Services....................................................................................... 23 c. Jury Demand Fee....................................................................................................... 24 d. Family Services and Alternative Dispute Resolution................................................ 24 e. Automation Fees........................................................................................................ 24 f. Youth Homes ............................................................................................................. 25 g. Facilities.................................................................................................................... 25 h. Indigent Defense and Legal Aid................................................................................ 25 i. Court Education ......................................................................................................... 26 j. Law Libraries ............................................................................................................. 26 k. Court Improvement Trust Funds ............................................................................... 26 l. Security.....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Explorer's Gazette
    EEXXPPLLOORREERR’’SS GAZETTE GAZETTE Published Quarterly in Pensacola, Florida USA for the Old Antarctic Explorers Association Uniting All OAEs in Perpetuating the History of U.S. Navy Involvement in Antarctica Volume 8, Issue 1 Old Antarctic Explorers Association, Inc Jan-Mar 2008 MV American Term at McMurdo Ice Pier 2008 US Navy Cargo Handling Battalion One Deployment Compiled by Billy-Ace Baker ach year, a tanker and a container ship from the Cargo Handling Battalion, it wouldn’t get offloaded”. Navy’s Military Sealift Command (MSC) make the “Those Sailors are absolutely essential in the operation.” E difficult journey through icy waters to McMurdo. Offloading these life-sustaining supplies to McMurdo These ships carry 100 percent of the fuel and more than 70 Station is critical—and there is only a small window of time percent of the food, scientific equipment, and other supplies during Antarctica's round-the-clock sunlight to accomplish that the station needs to operate. MSC has participated in the mission. If it doesn't get done, the entire Antarctica Operation Deep Freeze every year since McMurdo was mission would be forced to shut down. established in 1955. The United States established its largest permanent According to Rick Appling, a spokesperson for the station at McMurdo, which is a cluster of metal huts that MSC: “We can get the cargo there, but without the Navy See: Cargo Handling Battalion on page 4. E X P L O R E R ‘ S G A Z E T T E V O L U M E 8, I S S U E 1 J A N − M A R 2 0 0 8 P R E S I D E N T ’ S C O R N E R John Lamont West—OAEA President TO ALL OAEs—As we move into 2008 the Fourth OAEA Symposium/Reunion to be held in Pensacola, FL is fast approaching.
    [Show full text]
  • U:\Judgehovland\Law Clerks\Civil\Motions to Dismiss\Wilkinson V. Sbtwpd.Wpd
    Case 4:08-cv-00087-DLH-CSM Document 118 Filed 05/25/10 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA NORTHWESTERN DIVISION Peak North Dakota, LLC, a Colorado ) limited liability company; Peak Energy ) Resources, LLC, a Delaware limited ) liability company, Jack Vaughn, Alex ) McLean, and Matt Gray, ) ORDER ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 4:08-cv-087 ) Wilbur Wilkinson, Standing Bear ) Traders, LLC, a North Dakota limited ) liability company, and the Three Affiliated ) Tribes, Fort Berthold District Court, ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________________________________________ ) Wilbur Wilkinson, ) ) Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Standing Bear Traders, LLC, ) a North Dakota limited liability company, ) and Margarita Burciaga-Taylor and ) Richard Howell, individually and ) d/b/a Standing Bear Traders, LLC, ) ) Third-Party Defendants. ) Before the Court is Standing Bear Traders, LLC (SBT) and Margarita Burciaga-Taylor’s (Taylor) “Motion to Dismiss Wilkinson’s Third Party Complaint or, Alternatively, to Abstain from Exercising Jurisdiction Over Wilkinson’s Third Party Complaint” filed on January 15, 2010. See Docket No. 83. Third-Party Plaintiff Wilbur Wilkinson (Wilkinson) filed a response in opposition 1 Case 4:08-cv-00087-DLH-CSM Document 118 Filed 05/25/10 Page 2 of 12 to the motion on March 10, 2010. See Docket No. 106. Taylor and SBT filed a reply brief on March 24, 2010. See Docket No. 108. Taylor and SBT filed a supplemental appendix on March 26, 2010. See Docket No. 111. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND Peak North Dakota, LLC (Peak North) is a limited liability company organized under Colorado law and authorized to do business as a foreign limited liability company in North Dakota.
    [Show full text]
  • Worry Over Mistreating Clots Drove Push to Pause J&J Shot
    P2JW109000-6-A00100-17FFFF5178F ****** MONDAY,APRIL 19,2021~VOL. CCLXXVII NO.90 WSJ.com HHHH $4.00 Last week: DJIA 34200.67 À 400.07 1.2% NASDAQ 14052.34 À 1.1% STOXX 600 442.49 À 1.2% 10-YR. TREASURY À 27/32 , yield 1.571% OIL $63.13 À $3.81 EURO $1.1982 YEN 108.81 Bull Run What’s News In Stocks Widens, Business&Finance Signaling More stocks have been propelling the U.S. market higher lately,asignal that fur- Strength ther gains could be ahead, but howsmooth the climb might be remains up fordebate. A1 Technical indicators WeWork’s plan to list suggestmoregains, stock by merging with a but some question how blank-check company has echoes of its approach in smooth theywill be 2019,when the shared-office provider’s IPO imploded. A1 BY CAITLIN MCCABE Citigroup plans to scale up its services to wealthy GES Agreater number of stocks entrepreneurs and their IMA have been propelling the U.S. businesses in Asia as the market higher lately,asignal bank refocuses its opera- GETTY that—if historyisany indica- tions in the region. B1 SE/ tor—moregains could be ahead. What remains up forde- A Maryland hotel mag- bate, however, is how smooth natebehind an 11th-hour bid ANCE-PRES FR the climb will be. to acquireTribune Publish- Indicatorsthat point to a ing is working to find new ENCE stronger and moreresilient financing and partnership AG stock market have been hitting options after his partner ON/ LL rare milestones recently as the withdrew from the deal.
    [Show full text]
  • Petitioner, V
    No. 19-____ IN THE Supreme Court of the United States _______________________ JEFFREY ALAN OLSON, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent. _______________________ On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania _______________________ PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI _______________________ DAVID T. LEAKE AMIR H. ALI Counsel of Record MEGHA RAM* LAW OFFICE OF DAVID T. RODERICK & SOLANGE LEAKE MACARTHUR JUSTICE CENTER 130 West Main Street 777 6th Street NW, 11th Fl. Somerset, Pennsylvania 15501 Washington, DC 20001 [email protected] (202) 869-3434 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner *Admitted only in California; not admitted in D.C. Practicing under the supervision of the Roderick & Solange MacArthur Justice Center. QUESTION PRESENTED Whether this Court’s holding that states may not “impose criminal penalties on the refusal to submit to” a warrantless blood draw, Birchfield v. North Dakota, 136 S. Ct. 2160, 2185 (2016), is substantive and there- fore applies retroactively. (i) ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page(s) Question Presented .............................................................. i Table of Authorities ............................................................ iii Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari ....................................... 1 Opinions Below .................................................................... 1 Jurisdiction .......................................................................... 1 Statutory And Constitutional Provisions Involved...........
    [Show full text]
  • (Un)Natural Pairings: Fantastic, Uncanny, Monstrous, and Cyborgian Encounters in Contemporary Central American and Hispanic Caribbean Literature” By
    “(Un)Natural Pairings: Fantastic, Uncanny, Monstrous, and Cyborgian Encounters in Contemporary Central American and Hispanic Caribbean Literature” By Jennifer M. Abercrombie Foster @ Copyright 2016 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Spanish and Portuguese and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Co-Chairperson, Yajaira Padilla ________________________________ Co-Chairperson, Verónica Garibotto ________________________________ Jorge Pérez ________________________________ Vicky Unruh ________________________________ Hannah Britton ________________________________ Magalí Rabasa Date Defended: May 3, 2016 ii The Dissertation Committee for Jennifer M. Abercrombie Foster certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: “(Un)Natural Pairings: Fantastic, Uncanny, Monstrous, and Cyborgian Encounters in Contemporary Central American and Hispanic Caribbean Literature” ________________________________ Co-Chairperson, Yajaira Padilla ________________________________ Co-Chairperson, Verónica Garibotto Date approved: May 9, 2016 iii Abstract Since the turn of the 20th century many writers, playwrights, and poets in Central America and the Hispanic Caribbean have published fantastic, gritty, and oftentimes unsettling stories of ghosts, anthropomorphic animals, zoomorphic humans, and uncanny spaces. These unexpected encounters and strange entities are an embodiment of muddled boundaries and
    [Show full text]
  • The Path to the Next Normal
    The path to the next normal Leading with resolve through the coronavirus pandemic May 2020 Cover image: © Cultura RF/Getty Images Copyright © 2020 McKinsey & Company. All rights reserved. This publication is not intended to be used as the basis for trading in the shares of any company or for undertaking any other complex or significant financial transaction without consulting appropriate professional advisers. No part of this publication may be copied or redistributed in any form without the prior written consent of McKinsey & Company. The path to the next normal Leading with resolve through the coronavirus pandemic May 2020 Introduction On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization formally declared COVID-19 a pandemic, underscoring the precipitous global uncertainty that had plunged lives and livelihoods into a still-unfolding crisis. Just two months later, daily reports of outbreaks—and of waxing and waning infection and mortality rates— continue to heighten anxiety, stir grief, and cast into question the contours of our collective social and economic future. Never in modern history have countries had to ask citizens around the world to stay home, curb travel, and maintain physical distance to preserve the health of families, colleagues, neighbors, and friends. And never have we seen job loss spike so fast, nor the threat of economic distress loom so large. In this unprecedented reality, we are also witnessing the beginnings of a dramatic restructuring of the social and economic order—the emergence of a new era that we view as the “next normal.” Dialogue and debate have only just begun on the shape this next normal will take.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty Cutbacks Could Lower Tenure Standards Students Seek Exams In
    Faculty cutbacks could lower tenure standards By TOM SHRODER strc~sed he ~.ouI~i maintain his gandards or granting tenure Alligator Staff Writer I ~.ill leave ii to he adm mist ration to give mc a lair number of positions, Brown Dr. Robert Bryan. (IF vice president for academic affairs. said expressed concern about the threat of continued faculty Graduate School Dean Harry Sisler warned pressures to reductions in state universities over the next few years which grant tenure indiscriminately could drag UF into a pit of may result in deterioration of the quality of tenured UF mediocrity.' faculty. SISLER SUGGESTED each college be given projections of Next year UFis planningon a five per cent faculty cutback. the number of positions they could expect regardless of whether they granted or denied tenure. Bryan said. Bryan said it would be a natural reaction for deans to try to If colleges knew a position would rot automatically protect their faculty positions by creating as many tenured disappear once left open, the integrity of the tenure process could be preserved, Sisler said. positions as possible. Bryan noted problems might occur because the very un- IF A FACULTY MEMBER is denied tenure he must leave certain nature of projections that must be made to predict his position after one year. When the total number of faculty positions must be faculty positions colleges will earn. "We have not always been able to keep commitments we've reduced, a position left open by a tenure denial would be made to colleges in the past,'' he said.
    [Show full text]
  • British Statutes in American Jurisdictions 197
    December, 1929 BRITISH STATUITES IN AMERICAN JURISDICTIONS FREDERICKI G. MCKEAN, JR. The abstraction called the Law is a magic mirror wherein we see reflected not only our own lives, but the lives of all men that have been.-Attributed to Mr. Jus- tice Holmes. It has been said that man differs from other animals chiefly in this: that he retains in each generation that which has been handed down by its predecessor,, and, after applying the touchstone of experience, passes it to his successors. This commonplace has been phrased in the folk saying, "Experience is the best teacher", and in the legal aphorism that "the life of the law has been-experi- ence". An outstanding characteristic of the founding of this re- public was the tenacity with which our forefathers clung to their inheritance of the laws which their immigrant ancestors brought into the New World and adapted to the requirements of changed environment. John Adams is credited with the statement that he would not have taken the stand that he did in the War for Inde- pendence, if such action had involved the loss of the common law. Chief Justice Taft says, "We embodied in the Bill of Rights in our Constitution the principles of the British Constitution as they had. been established at the Common Law."' At the threshold of the Revolution the American Continental Congress of 1774, under the presidency of George Washington, adopted this resolution: "Resolved, N. C. D. 5. That the respective colonies are entitled to the common law of England, and more espe- cially to the great and inestimable privilege of being tried by their peers of the vicinage, according to the course of that law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Proposed North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure
    North Dakota Law Review Volume 32 Number 2 Article 2 1956 The Proposed North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure Charles Liebert Crum Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Crum, Charles Liebert (1956) "The Proposed North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure," North Dakota Law Review: Vol. 32 : No. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr/vol32/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Dakota Law Review by an authorized editor of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PROPOSED NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CHARLES LIEBERT CRUM* N THE preceding article there appears a plea for the adoption of the proposed North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure' by one of the nation's most distinguished authorities on pleading and prac- tice. Judge Holtzoff's standing as an expert on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure- from which the North Dakota Rules have been largely derived- is attested by the fact he is co-author of a work on them which is considered definitive in its field. Undoubtedly it is a work of supererogation to publish two papers on this subject in the same issue of the North Dakota Law Review when one of them bears such distinguished authorship. Nevertheless the subject involved is one of such importance and has aroused so much professional interest that possibly two treat- ments of it are permissible, particularly when the method of analy- sis differs.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and Humour II: Reinventing The
    Issue 2011 35 Gender and Humour II: Reinventing the Genres of Laughter Edited by Prof. Dr. Beate Neumeier ISSN 1613-1878 Editor About Prof. Dr. Beate Neumeier Gender forum is an online, peer reviewed academic University of Cologne journal dedicated to the discussion of gender issues. As an English Department electronic journal, gender forum offers a free-of-charge Albertus-Magnus-Platz platform for the discussion of gender-related topics in the D-50923 Köln/Cologne fields of literary and cultural production, media and the Germany arts as well as politics, the natural sciences, medicine, the law, religion and philosophy. Inaugurated by Prof. Dr. Tel +49-(0)221-470 2284 Beate Neumeier in 2002, the quarterly issues of the journal Fax +49-(0)221-470 6725 have focused on a multitude of questions from different email: [email protected] theoretical perspectives of feminist criticism, queer theory, and masculinity studies. gender forum also includes reviews and occasionally interviews, fictional pieces and Editorial Office poetry with a gender studies angle. Laura-Marie Schnitzler, MA Sarah Youssef, MA Opinions expressed in articles published in gender forum Christian Zeitz (General Assistant, Reviews) are those of individual authors and not necessarily endorsed by the editors of gender forum. Tel.: +49-(0)221-470 3030/3035 email: [email protected] Submissions Editorial Board Target articles should conform to current MLA Style (8th edition) and should be between 5,000 and 8,000 words in Prof. Dr. Mita Banerjee, length. Please make sure to number your paragraphs Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (Germany) and include a bio-blurb and an abstract of roughly 300 Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa 1882-2020
    HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA 1882-2020 PREFACE The Northern District of Iowa Historical Society, a branch of the Eighth Circuit Historical Society, was formed in 1999 and remains an active branch today. The Historical Society is comprised of judges, court staff, and attorneys admitted to the bar and practicing in the Northern District of Iowa. The Historical Society’s mission is to collect and preserve historical information, data, documents, artwork, writings, artifacts, and exhibits pertaining to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. In 1987, the Northern District of Iowa Historical Society published the History of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, 1882-1987. The book was written to honor the Nation’s bicentennial anniversary and to provide the public with an overview of the development of the Northern District of Iowa. Using the first edition as a basis, and adding records and recollections from current and former judges, the History of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, 1882-2000 was published in April 2003. Working from the prior versions, and with assistance, records, and recollections from judges and court agencies, the history book has been updated through 2020. Notable changes include a chapter on the historic 2008 Cedar Rapids Flood, inclusion of agencies such as the United States Marshals Service and United States Attorney’s Office, a section on the Iowa Civil Bar, and more in-depth historical information on the structures that have housed the Court.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Mission Nutrition' Activators Kicks Off in Chehalis
    $1 Weekend Edition Saturday, April 21, 2012 Reaching 110,000 Readers in Print and Online — www.chronline.com Activators Kicks Off in Chehalis / Sports 1 Firefighters Honor Fallen Mossyrock ‘Mission Nutrition’ Chief / Main 3 ... at Centralia College Family Fun Fest / Main 16 Search for Missing Man Deputies Pull Daniel Kuhn’s Ends in Tragedy Body From Chehalis River By Kyle Spurr and Eric Schwartz ties who were planning a Sunday effort The Chronicle to find 24-year-old Daniel Kuhn discov- ered his body under about five feet of DOTY — The search for an Olympia water upstream from the Chandler Road man who went missing on the Chehalis Bridge early Thursday evening. River during the Pe Ell River Run came to an abrupt end Thursday. Lewis County Sheriff’s Office depu- please see TRAGEDY, page Main 12 Lewis County Sherif’s Oice and Coroner’s Oice person- nel work to remove the body of Daniel Kuhn from a steep bank along the Chehalis River upstream from the Chandler Road Bridge early Thursday evening. Chris Geier / [email protected] Sherif’s oice and coroner’s oice personnel work along the bank of the Chehalis River upstream from the Chandler Road Bridge Thursday evening. The body of 24-year-old Olympia man Daniel Kuhn was found about 450 yards upstream from the Willapa Hills Trail where a former railroad trestle was washed away during the 2007 Chehalis River lood. Kuhn went missing during the Pe Ell River Run last weekend. His body was found by two deputies Thursday. The Chronicle, Serving The Greater Weather Napavine Development Deaths Lewis County Area Since 1889 TONIGHT: Low 48 Flood Roberts, Henry R.
    [Show full text]