[Pennsylvania County Histories]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

[Pennsylvania County Histories] '■ -- J-/1 ?7*f. 3 // V. 73 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from This project is made possible by a grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services as administered by the Pennsylvania Department of Education through the Office of Commonwealth Libraries https://archive.org/details/pennsylvaniacoun73unse i > 3. ) •> MARK TWAIN’S s&ftai? moK. E A TENTS: UNITED STATES. GREAT BRITAIN. FRANCE. June 24TH, 1873. May i6th, 1877. May i 8th, 1877. TRADE MARKS: UNITED STATES. GREAT BRITAIN. Registered No. 5,896. Registered No. 15,979. DIRECTIONS. Use but little moisture, and only on the gummed lines. Press the scrap on without wetting it. DANIEL SLOPE & COMPANY, NEW YORK. U V \ / .the vault owners were paid by the cliurch for [the ground and also for the expense of the transfer of the bodies, the majority of which went to Mount Vernon Cemetery. The Tenth Presbyterian Chhreh was pro¬ jected by Furman Learning, at that time in the hardware business on Market street. The corner stone was laid on July 13, 1828. It was a plain unpretentious structure more like a Quaker meeting house than a church of this day and was never modernized or en¬ larged. The church was opened for service in December, 1829. THE ORIGINAL TRUSTEES. The first Board of Trustees, which served i until May, 1831, were Solomon Allen, William Brown, James Kerr, Furman Learning, George Ralston, Thomas Fleming, Samuel Hilde- burn, James Hunter, Isaac Macaulay, Joshua Tovis, Moses Johnson, Dr. Henry Bond, Charles Watres. Robert Burgess, James Leslie, William W. McMain, John Stille, Jr., and William Watt. DR. BOAR DM AN :S PARISHIONERS Of these many have descendants living in the city, among whom are Miss Margery Ten tli Presbyterian Congregation Di- Dickson, a granddaughter of Solomon Allen; i vibes Its Valuable Property Between Misses Elizabeth, Mary and Fanny Brown and Mrs. G. Dawson Coleman, daughters of Two Other Churches and Will Per¬ William Brown; M. T. Johnson, a son of petuate Its Same Moses Johnson ; two sons of Samuel Hilue- burn and a daughter of Furman Learning. W. G. Stille and Annie Stille, now of Brook¬ The old church edifice at the corner of lyn, but formerly well-known residents of Twelfth and Walnut streets, which was this city, are the children of John Stille, Jr. Among the surviving members of the icrected by and was for sixty-five years the church who joined it within a few years of devotional home of the congregation of the its founding are Robert Cresswell and Will¬ Tenth Presbyterian Church of this city, will iam L. Dubois. soon be a thing of the past. Among the prominent old-time members of ! The building and lot upon which it stands the church were General and Colonel Patter¬ has been sold, and the Episcopal Diocesan son, Judge Greer. Judge William A. Por¬ ter, William E. Dubois and Judge James House will be erected there. The thirty-five Thompson. jhoclies which were interred in the twenty A LONG PASTORATE. vaults in the small yard at the rear of the The first pastor was the Rev. Dr. Thomas church have, during the past week, been McAuley, of New York. He was superseded transferred to other cemeteries, and the in 1833 by the Rev. Henry A. Boardman, a demolition of the old church itself will soon young man just admitted to the ministry at [begin. Princeton, who remained with the church | Tho old church is an object of interest and until May, 1876, when he resigned owing to ' affection to many old Philadelphians owing fill health. He was made pastor emeritus and -to the fact that for forty-two years it was the died four years later. During his pastorate chargo of the Rev.- Henry A. Boardman, a the church became very prosperous, many of, Philadelphia clergyman, whose fame spread Philadelphia’s wealthiest men belonging to it over the whole laDd and whose strong indi¬ [and the congregation became so large that viduality bound to him up to the ciay of his either a larger building or a division of the death a congregation larger than the old- church became necessary. fashioned church structure would accommo¬ Dr. Boardman advised the forming of a date. So strong was this tie between pastor colony to found another church, and his ad¬ and congregation that the members of this vice being followed the West Spruce Street [church were distinguished from other Pres¬ Presbyterian Church, at Seventeenth and byterians of tho city by the name, “Board- Spruce streets, was the result. A peculiar feature, of the sale of the old church is that ’ ;manites,’’ and this title still clings to them the congregation of the original church now 1 fourteen years after Dr. Boaraman’s death. go to their offspring, the West Spruce Street PROMINENT PHILADELPHIANS’ TOMBS. Church, and donate to that church one-half The transfer of the bodies in the cemetery the proceeds of the sale on the condition that the name of the old church be adopted. The | will also awaken memories of men prominent other half is to be given to the Hollond Me-aS | in social, professional and husiness circles morial Church. nearly a century ago, quite a little coterie of Dr. Boardman was followed by the Rev. i whom owned vaults and were interred there. John Dewitt, who was nastor until 1882, and - I There were twenty vaults in the cemetery then by the Rev. William B. Greene, the last land thirty-five bodies rested there. Among pastor, who retired in 1892. The? church property is 88 feet wide on the vault owners were Dr. A. W. Mitchell, a Walnut street by 125 feet ou l'wekth and prominent physician in the early half of the cost wheu purchased $11,700. The church century ; John Knox, John S. Riddle, Thomas structure cost $21,000. It was sold for $150,000. Armstrong and many others. The heirs of /? phia and on summer days to one oF the most From,. L picturesque and interesting of the many small parks which have recently been ac¬ quired by the city. John Bartram’s famous botanical gardens. These people, it must be remembered, live a long distance away from Fairmount and thus seldom find time, even in summer, to avail themselves of its pleas¬ ures. Gray’s Ferry has many historic associa¬ tions, At one time, long before Fairmount GRAY’S FERRY Park was thought of, Gray’s Gardens, which, have long since disappeared, were a popular ! BRIDGES resort on summer days for all classes and con¬ ditions of Philadelphians. The gardens stood; nn the eastern bank of the river, at the foot; THERE HAVE BEEN TWO AND MAY BE if Gray’s Ferry Road, close by the ferry, just A THIRD. far enough from the city proper to be a de¬ lightful walk or drive on a summer after-' noon through country roads and shady THE SPOT FULL OF MEMORIES lanes. The river banks were laid out! with pleasant walks and ornamented; with shrubbery. There were artificial Gray’s Gardens Were Once a Popular Re¬ islands and waterfalls, bowers and grot¬ toes, and every means had been taken to sort, and the Old Floating Bridge Carried make the place attractive. It would be inter-! - esting to have a list of the names of notable, Both the British and the Continental strangers who visited these gardens. Many Armies Across the Schuylkill. fetes of great importance were held there,' among the most notable of them a reception to General Washington and hi* family on the Mayor Stuart, in his last annual message to 2d of September, 1790. The gardens were elaborately decorated, a prominent feature! Councils, directed the attention of that body being a Federal temple, which had for one of! to the great need of a new bridge across the its ornaments a vault of twelve stones, repre- ' Schuylkill river at Gray’s Ferry, and on the senting the Federal Union. From a grove in j , 21st of March Councils' survey committee, on the garden there came at an appointed time > motion of Common Councilman Lewis W.l thirteen young ladiesdressed as shepherdesses j •! Moore, of the Twenty-seventh ward, agreed and thirteen young men attired asshepherds. Li They proceeded to the Federal temple, where ^ to report favorably on an ordinance appropri¬ they sang an ode to liberty, which was di-1 ating $133,000 for the city’s share of cost in! _ _ versified_by solos, chorus and responses. OLD FLOATING erecting a new bridge at Gray’s Ferry. Andl After this entertainment was over an elab¬ it now seems certain that, as soon as Coun-I orate collation was served, which was fol¬ cils’ finance committee can find the money to lowed at night by an illumination of the begin its construction, this new bridge will grounds. be built and thus facilitate, it is thought by many residents of West Philadelphia, the George Gray, who established the gardens, opening up of a vast section of now practi¬ was the second ferry master at what in early cally unused property in the southwestern days was known as the lower ferry. This section of the city. It is also asserted that lower ferry was probably established shortly . the new bridge will be of great benefit to res¬ after complaint was made in 1673 by the idents on the eastern side of the river by af¬ Swedes that Philip England was obstructing fording them ready access to West Philadel-I their passage at the middle ferry. Benjamin Chambers was the first ferry master.
Recommended publications
  • Historic-District-Satterlee-Heights.Pdf
    NOMINATION OF HISTORIC DISTRICT PHILADELPHIA REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES PHILADELPHIA HISTORICAL COMMISSION SUBMIT ALL ATTACHED MATERIALS ON PAPER AND IN ELECTRONIC FORM ON CD (MS WORD FORMAT) 1. NAME OF HISTORIC DISTRICT The Satterlee Heights Historic District 2. LOCATION Please attach a map of Philadelphia locating the historic district. Councilmanic District(s): 3 3. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION Please attach a map of the district and a written description of the boundary. 4. DESCRIPTION Please attach a description of built and natural environments in the district. 5. INVENTORY Please attach an inventory of the district with an entry for every property. All street addresses must coincide with official Office of Property Assessment addresses. Total number of properties in district: 8 Count buildings with multiple units as one. Number of properties already on Register/percentage of total: 2/25% Number of significant properties/percentage of total: 8/100% Number of contributing properties/percentage of total: 0/8 Number of non-contributing properties/percentage of total: NA 6. SIGNIFICANCE Please attach the Statement of Significance. Period of Significance (from year to year): from 1871 to 1897. CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION: The historic district satisfies the following criteria for designation (check all that apply): (a) Has significant character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the City, Commonwealth or Nation or is associated with the life of a person significant in the past; or, (b) Is associated
    [Show full text]
  • Philadelphia Merchants, Trans-Atlantic Smuggling, and The
    Friends in Low Places: Philadelphia Merchants, Trans-Atlantic Smuggling, and the Secret Deals that Saved the American Revolution By Tynan McMullen University of Colorado Boulder History Honors Thesis Defended 3 April 2020 Thesis Advisor Dr. Virginia Anderson, Department of History Defense Committee Dr. Miriam Kadia, Department of History Capt. Justin Colgrove, Department of Naval Science, USMC 1 Introduction Soldiers love to talk. From privates to generals, each soldier has an opinion, a fact, a story they cannot help themselves from telling. In the modern day, we see this in the form of leaked reports to newspapers and controversial interviews on major networks. On 25 May 1775, as the British American colonies braced themselves for war, an “Officer of distinguished Rank” was running his mouth in the Boston Weekly News-Letter. Boasting about the colonial army’s success ​ ​ during the capture of Fort Ticonderoga two weeks prior, this anonymous officer let details slip about a far more concerning issue. The officer remarked that British troops in Boston were preparing to march out to “give us battle” at Cambridge, but despite their need for ammunition “no Powder is to be found there at present” to supply the Massachusetts militia.1 This statement was not hyperbole. When George Washington took over the Continental Army on 15 June, three weeks later, he was shocked at the complete lack of munitions available to his troops. Two days after that, New England militiamen lost the battle of Bunker Hill in agonizing fashion, repelling a superior British force twice only to be forced back on the third assault.
    [Show full text]
  • Morris-Shinn-Maier Collection
    Morris-Shinn-Maier collection MC.1191 Janela Harris and Jon Sweitzer-Lamme Other authors include: Daniel Lenahan, Kate Janoski, Jonathan Berke, Henry Wiencek and John Powers. Last updated on May 14, 2021. Haverford College Quaker & Special Collections Morris-Shinn-Maier collection Table of Contents Summary Information....................................................................................................................................3 Biography/History..........................................................................................................................................6 Biography/History..........................................................................................................................................7 Scope and Contents..................................................................................................................................... 14 Administrative Information......................................................................................................................... 15 Controlled Access Headings........................................................................................................................16 Collection Inventory.................................................................................................................................... 18 Historical Papers.................................................................................................................................... 18 Individuals..............................................................................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Morris-Shinn-Maier Collection HC.Coll.1191
    Morris-Shinn-Maier collection HC.Coll.1191 Finding aid prepared by Janela Harris and Jon Sweitzer-Lamme Other authors include: Daniel Lenahan, Kate Janoski, Jonathan Berke, Henry Wiencek and John Powers This finding aid was produced using the Archivists' Toolkit September 28, 2012 Describing Archives: A Content Standard Haverford College Quaker & Special Collections July 18, 2011 370 Lancaster Ave Haverford, PA, 19041 610-896-1161 [email protected] Morris-Shinn-Maier collection HC.Coll.1191 Table of Contents Summary Information ................................................................................................................................. 3 Biographical/Historical note.......................................................................................................................... 7 Biographical/Historical note.......................................................................................................................... 8 Scope and Contents note............................................................................................................................. 15 Administrative Information .......................................................................................................................16 Controlled Access Headings........................................................................................................................16 Collection Inventory...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Teiiii^ !!Ti;;:!L||^^ -STATUS ACCESSIBLE Categbry OWNERSHIP (Check One) to the PUBLIC
    THEME: Socia Movements , NATIONAL HIST01 'LANDMARK Pri Re form. Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STATE: (Rev. 6-72) • f NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Pennsylvania COUNTY; NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Philadelphia INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY {NATTOIT/J, FT5703IC' ENTRY DATE ^mWiij.nitf.'TjypQ all entries - complete applicable sections) '^^^^^^^K^y^^iy^' SitlllP W!i*:': %$$$SX ^ v;!f ';^^:-M^ '^'''^S^iii^^X^i^i^S^^^ :- • y;;£ ' ' ' . :':^:- -• * : :V COMMON: Eastern State Penitentiary AND/OR HISTORIJC: [ Eastern State Penitentiary i'**i* ^Sririiii1 :*. -: . ' ',&$;':•&. \-Stf: -: #gy&. Vii'Sviv:; .<:. :':.x:x.?:.S :•:;:..:-.:;:;.:: : . :: r :' ..:•: :1.';V.':::::::1 -?:--:i^ . ....:. :•;. ¥.:? :?:>.::;:•:•:.:¥:" .v:::::^1:;:gS::::::S*;v*ri-:':i ftyWf*,^ ;:-.;. ; .;.^:|:.:. ....;- , ••;.,.; ,: ; : '.,:• f-^..^ ;. .S:.';: >• tell^•fcf S*fV;| :*;Wfl :-K;:; • ; -f,/ •.. ••, •••<>•' • •• .;.;.•• • ;.:;••••: •••/:' ..... :.:• :'. :•:.:: ;'V •': v,-"::;.:-;.:;.: :•;•: ^V - -•;.•: ;:>:••:;. .:.'-;.,.::---7:-::i.;v ' '''-:' jji.:'./s iSgfci'S ,':':Sv:;,: ' K JftiSiSWix?-: S.^:!:?--;:. ; S*;.?. S '«:;.;Si-.--:':.-'.;"-- :':: -::x: '; ^.^-Sy .:;•?.,!.;:.•::;•" • . STREET AND NUMBER: 21st Street and Fairmount Avenue CITY OR TOWN: CONGRE SSIONAU DISTRICT: Philadelphia 3 STATE { CODE COUNTY CODE f Pennsylvania 42 Philadelpftia lol teiiii^ !!ti;;:!l||^^ -STATUS ACCESSIBLE CATEGbRY OWNERSHIP (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC C3 District (Jg Building S3 P"b''c Public Acquisition: S3 Occupied Yes: r-i n • j Q Restricted Q Site Q Structure D Private O ln Process LJ Unoccupied ' — ' D Object D Both Q Being Considere<i LJr—i Preservationo worki D*— ' Unrestricted in progress IS No 'PRESENT USE (Check One or More ea Appropriate) D Agricultural \ Q§ Government Q Park O Transportation CD Comments Q Commercial f CD Industrial Q Private Residence JS< Other (Sped*,) D Educotionalj D Military Q Religious Used bv Philadelphia C}tv D Entertainment Q Museum Q Scientific Police.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventeenth Through Nineteenth Century Philadelphia Quakers As the First Advocates for Insane, Imprisoned, and Impoverishe
    Seventeenth through Nineteenth scholars Hugh Barbour and J. William Frost Century Philadelphia Quakers as the note how “In the English Northwest, Fox and Nayler were at first violently beaten or stoned First Advocates for Insane, and called Puritans.”[1] Friends seeking to Imprisoned, and Impoverished escape religious intolerance in England clashed Populations with Puritan ideology in the early American colonies. The average Quaker was ostracized and persecuted in England, and more so in New Joanna Riley England. Puritans carried out harsh, cruel Senior, Secondary Education/Social Studies punishments freely in the new world, effectively stunting the spread of Quakerism in The Society of Friends, especially in the New England. As a result, Philadelphia city of Philadelphia, was the only group in the provided ample audiences who would attend seventeenth century through mid-nineteenth weekly, monthly, and annual major meetings, century to align themselves with the plight of but also to further advancement in policy and those deemed insane, imprisoned, or reform efforts. impoverished. While the connection to the Concerned with the lack of Quaker insane was seemingly decided on by those institutions for those within the Society of outside of the Society of Friends, their Friends, and excluded from English first-hand experience of being thrown into institutions, they began founding their own. prison simply for being Quaker brought to light Originally, these places were to be created by the awful conditions within. Women served not and for the Quakers themselves, in order to only as ministers and proponents within the better facilitate rehabilitation to fellow Friends. Quaker movement, but also as caregivers and Gradually, they expanded their mission to nurses within the institutions created by the include those outside the faith; Quaker or not, Friends in order to improve society as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutionalizing the Pennsylvania System: Organizational Exceptionalism, Administrative Support, and Eastern State Penitentiary, 1829–1875
    Institutionalizing the Pennsylvania System: Organizational Exceptionalism, Administrative Support, and Eastern State Penitentiary, 1829–1875 By Ashley Theresa Rubin A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Malcolm Feeley, Chair Professor Cybelle Fox Professor Calvin Morrill Professor Jonathan Simon Spring 2013 Copyright c 2013 Ashley Theresa Rubin All rights reserved Abstract Institutionalizing the Pennsylvania System: Organizational Exceptionalism, Administrative Support, and Eastern State Penitentiary, 1829–1875 by Ashley Theresa Rubin Doctor of Philosophy in Jurisprudence and Social Policy University of California, Berkeley Professor Malcolm Feeley, Chair I examine the puzzling case of Eastern State Penitentiary and its long-term retention of a unique mode of confinement between 1829 and 1875. Most prisons built in the nineteenth cen- tury followed the “Auburn System” of congregate confinement in which inmates worked daily in factory-like settings and retreated at night to solitary confinement. By contrast, Eastern State Penitentiary (f. 1829, Philadelphia) followed the “Pennsylvania System” of separate confinement in which each inmate was confined to his own cell for the duration of his sentence, engaging in workshop-style labor and receiving religious ministries, education, and visits from selected person- nel. Between 1829 and the 1860s, Eastern faced strong pressures to conform to field-wide norms and adopt the Auburn System. As the progenitor of the Pennsylvania System, Eastern became the target of a debate raging over the appropriate model of “prison discipline.” Supporters of the Auburn System (penal reformers and other prisons’ administrators) propagated calumnious myths, arguing that the Pennsylvania System was cruel and inhumane, dangerous to inmates’ physical and mental health, too expensive, and simply impractical and ineffective.
    [Show full text]
  • The Walnut Street Prison: Pennsylvania's First Penitentiary*
    THE WALNUT STREET PRISON: PENNSYLVANIA'S FIRST PENITENTIARY* By LEROY B. DEPUY THE MEDIEVAL fortress on Cherry Hill which is Phila- delphia's Eastern State Penitentiary and the Bastille-like West- ern State Penitentiary at Pittsburgh, each weathered by over a century, appear to moderns as primordial types of prison establish- ments. When first erected, however, these were advanced, even radical, institutions which had developed only after extensive ex- perimentation at Pennsylvania's first State penitentiary, the Walnut Street Prison, for a half century a landmark alongside Independ- ence Square. The parent institution, now forgotten except by a few specialists, played a most significant role, influencing both prison architecture and prison administration in Pennsylvania, in Amer- ica, and in the world. It is perhaps significant that this first of all penitentiaries, an institution which in its own somewhat grisly fashion also brought relief to the oppressed, rubbed shoulders so intimately with the Hall made memorable by the conventions of the founding fathers. It is worth noting, too, that the life span of the Walnut Street Prison matches almost exactly that of Pennsyl- vania's first State constitution, in effect from 1790 to 1838. During a period marked by reforms, enlightened humanitarians in Phila- delphia, chiefly Quakers, came to realize that cruelty of punishment was failing to deter from crime, and at very considerable sacrifice of their own convenience and comfort, initiated at the Walnut Street Prison a new and improved method for dealing with con- *Mr. DePuy, a member of the staff of the Division of Public Records of the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, originally prepared this historical sketch of the old Walnut Street Prison for publication in the Annual Report of the Philadelphia County Prison.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death Penalty in Decline: from Colonial America to the Present John D
    University of Baltimore Law ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law All Faculty Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 2014 Foreword: The eD ath Penalty in Decline: From Colonial America to the Present John Bessler University of Baltimore School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/all_fac Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, and the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation Foreword: The eD ath Penalty in Decline: From Colonial America to the Present, 50 Crim. L. Bull. 245 (2014) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RIMI AL LAW BULLETIN Volume 50, Number 2 FOREWORD THE DEATH PE~ALTY IN DECLINE: FROM COLONIAL AMERICA TO THE PRESENT John D. Bessler Foreword The Death Penalty in Decline: From Colonial America to the Present John D. Bessler" In colonial America, corporal punishments-both lethal and non­ lethal-were a gritty reality of life. The Massachusetts "Body of Uber­ ties," adopted in 1641, contained twelve capital offenses and authorized the imposition of up to forty lashes. Everything from murder and rebellion, to adultery and bestiality, to blasphemy and witchcraft were punishable by death, with eleven of the twelve offenses-as
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Square: a Site Plan Chronology 1683-1984 Washington Square: a Site Plan Chronology 1683 - 1984
    Im o (cvOfo^L. ¿n-e>ie^c>,sosL 'òli/fr-io 7 Washington Square: A Site Plan Chronology 1683-1984 Washington Square: A Site Plan Chronology 1683 - 1984 by Denise R. Rabzak May 1987 National Park Service n d /~'.rì 3Ti 'i c ■ H isto rica l Park Chronological Outline 1683 William Penn's Surveyor-General, Thomas Holme, laid out Philadelphia in the earliest known plan of the city, "a portraiture of the City of Phila. in the Province of Penna. By Thomas Holme, surveyor General. Sold by Andrew Sowle in Shore ditch, London." In this plan, Holme dedicated five squares - Northeast, Northwest, Southeast, Southwest, and Center Squares - "for the like uses as the moorfields in London." 4>i The squares became known by these geographical names in accordance with Quaker tradition which avoided naming for persons. 1,2,3 (notes 4-18) 1700's (The following observations'? many from Watson's Annals, are presumably 18th century descriptions of the square, though exact dates have not a been established). The square was called "Beek's (sic, Beakes’) Hollow after an early settler. 4 At that time, the ground was not as high and level as it is today. It sloped from its western boundary "to a deep gully, through which a creek flowed near Walnut Street." 5 "...a descending ground, from the western side to a deep gully which traversed it in a line from Doctor Wilson's large church to the mouth of the present tunnel on Sixth Street below Walnut Street. Another course of water came from the northwest, from beyond Arch Street, fall­ ing into the same place." 6 A floodgate in the deep gully at the end of the tunnel retained water in the hollow basin of the square.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION to USERS the Quality of This Reproduction Is
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI fihns the text directly fiom the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in ^pewriter fiue, while others may be firom anytype o f computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy suhmitted. Broken or indistinct prmt, colored or poor quality illustrations and photogrtyhs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing fi-om left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back o f the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerogr^hically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9” black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy ftrr an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI A Bdl & Howell iDfinination Qmipai^ 300 North Zed) Road, Aim Arbor MI 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/5214)600 PROKT AMD FENITMMCM AM AEMZMZ8TMASXVB EISTORY Of THE 08X0 FBUnHTZARr FROM 1815 TO 1885 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the History Department at The Ohio State University By Dona M.
    [Show full text]
  • In Philadelphia from the Proceeds of the Sale of the Walnut Street Plant
    9 THE PLACE OF "THE PHILADELPHIA SOCIETY * FOR ALLEVIATING THE MISERIES OF PUBLIC PRISONS" IN AMERICAN PRISON REFORM By HARRY ELMER BARNES, PH.D., PROFESSOR OF HISTORY, CLARK UNIVERSITY (Continued from the April number) . THE NEW PENITENTIARY , It was due in large part to this memorial of 1818 that an act was passed March 3, 1818, appropriating sixty thousand dollars for building a peniten- tiary at Allegheny on the principle of solitary confinement. This same act au- thorized, but did not command, the sale of the Walnut Street jail, the removal ?f the prisoners to the Arch Street prison, and the erection of a new penitentiary In Philadelphia from the proceeds of the sale of the Walnut Street plant. As no definite action was taken on this authorization of 1818 with respect to build- 1119 a new penitentiary in Philadelphia, the society came forward with the fol- lowing final memorial of 1821, which succeeded in securing the passage of the tlct of March 20, 1821, appropriating one hundred thousand dollars for the Section of a state penitentiary in the county of Philadelphia capable of receiv- Ing two hundred and fifty convicts. To the Senate and House of of the Commonwealth of in g Representatives Pennsylvania, General Assembly met. The Memorial of the Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons, Respectfully Represents, That it is now nearly forty years since some of your Memorialists associated for the Pirpose of alleviating the miseries of public prisons, as well as for procuring the melioration of the code of as far as these effects be their penal .
    [Show full text]