Crab Pagurus Longicarpus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Crab Pagurus Longicarpus Marine Biology (2002) 140: 1059–1066 DOI 10.1007/s00227-002-0780-2 A.M. Young Æ C. Torres Æ J.E. Mack C.W. Cunningham Morphological and genetic evidence for vicariance and refugium in Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico populations of the hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus Received: 23 February 2001 / Accepted: 14 December 2001 / Published online: 2 March 2002 Ó Springer-Verlag 2002 Abstract The number and wide variety of southeastern may represent survivors from a northern refugium dur- United States marine taxa with significant differentiation ing the last glacial maximum. between Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean populations suggests that these taxa may have experienced major vicariance events, whereby populations were subdivided by geological or ecological barriers. The present study Introduction compared variation in morphology, allozymes, and mtDNA in Gulf of Mexico and western Atlantic popu- A wide variety of marine fauna found in the southeast- lations of the longwrist hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus ern United States, from hydroids to sturgeon, have been Say collected during 1997 and 1998. Combined Atlantic the subject of population genetics studies in the past two populations had significantly fewer denticles on the decades (see reviews by Avise 1992; Cunningham and second segment of the third maxilliped than did Gulf of Collins 1994, 1998; Felder and Staton 1994; and addi- Mexico populations, and the mean ratio of dactyl length tional papers by McCommas 1982; Hoagland 1984; to propodus length was significantly greater in the Cunningham et al. 1991; Staton and Felder 1995; Atlantic crabs than in the Gulf of Mexico crabs. Allo- Foighil et al. 1996; Mangum and McKenney 1996; Tam zyme allele frequencies at three loci showed genetic dif- et al. 1996). Many studies have found significant geo- ferentiation between a Gulf of Mexico population and graphic differentiation between populations in the Gulf two Atlantic populations. Analysis of mtDNA sequence of Mexico and along the Atlantic coast, with a hybrid data revealed a clear reciprocal monophyly between zone in the Cape Canaveral area. Most surprising was Gulf and Atlantic populations, with an estimated the discovery of significant genetic differentiation in taxa divergence age of 0.6 million years ago. This estimated that are continuously distributed around the Florida age of divergence is significantly more recent than an age peninsula, and which showed little or no morphological previously estimated for its congener Pagurus pollicaris variation (e.g. the American oyster, Crassostrea virgini- ( 4 million years ago), suggesting that species with a ca). Perhaps less surprising has been the discovery of similar genetic break between Gulf and Atlantic popu- significant genetic differentiation in taxa that are found lations may not necessarily share an identical history. in the Gulf and the Atlantic, but are disjunct in the Surprisingly, there is evidence of geographic subdivision tropical waters off southern Florida. These disjunct taxa within Atlantic populations of P. longicarpus along the are so numerous that they have been designated the east coast of North America. This differentiation is Carolinian biogeographic fauna (Briggs 1974; Cunn- especially strong between Nova Scotia and southern ingham and Collins 1998). populations, suggesting that the Nova Scotia population The discovery of so many taxa with significant geo- graphic differentiation between the Gulf and the Atlantic suggests that these taxa may have experienced Communicated by J.P. Grassle, New Brunswick major vicariance events, whereby populations were A.M. Young (&) Æ J.E. Mack subdivided by geological or ecological barriers. For Biology Department, Salem State College, example, Reeb and Avise (1990) suggested that lowering Salem, MA 01970, USA of the sea level and concurrent changes in climate during E-mail: [email protected] glacial maxima resulted in a lack of estuarine habitat C. Torres Æ C.W. Cunningham along the southern portion of the Florida peninsula. Department of Biology, Duke University, The longwrist hermit crab, Pagurus longicarpus, has Durham, NC 27708, USA been collected in the western Atlantic from Mahone Bay 1060 on the east coast of Nova Scotia (Young, personal ob- parisons – nuclear (allozyme) and mitochondrial servation) to Hutchinson Island on the east coast of (cytochrome oxidase I mtDNA sequence, COI) data Florida (Camp et al. 1977) and in the Gulf of Mexico were collected from several Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic from the Shark River in southwestern Florida (Rouse populations of P. longicarpus. 1970) to Galveston Bay, Texas (Fotheringham 1976). That is, P. longicarpus has a disjunct distribution in the western Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico (see Fig. 1). Materials and methods Unlike many other taxa with a similar disjunct distri- bution, Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic populations Sample collection and storage of P. longicarpus exhibit morphological differences Fifty live Pagurus longicarpus Say were obtained between April and (Provenzano 1959). Together with its disjunct distribu- September during 1997 and 1998 from each of ten locations tion around southern Florida, these morphological dif- (identifying letter in parentheses): near Meisner’s Island in Mahone ferences are consistent with distinct evolutionary Bay, Nova Scotia (NS); Damariscotta River, Maine (M); Salem histories for Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic populations. Harbor, Salem, Massachusetts (S); Vineyard Sound, Woods Hole, The only previous study comparing Gulf of Mexico Massachusetts (W) (Marine Biological Laboratory Supply Center); off Beaufort, North Carolina (NC); North Inlet, South Carolina and Atlantic P. longicarpus found very little genetic (SC); New College Bayfront in Sarasota Bay, Florida (F); the east variation. In a study using 16 S mtDNA, Cunningham end of Shell Point, Apalachee Bay, Panacea, Florida (P) (Gulf et al. (1992) found only a single base pair (bp) substi- Specimen Marine Supply); and East Beach, Red Fish Cove in West tution distinguishing Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic indi- Galveston Bay, Texas (T) (see Fig. 1). All specimens other than those from Woods Hole and Apalachee Bay (purchased from viduals (0.2% divergence). This contrasts with eight commercial suppliers) were collected by the authors or colleagues substitutions (2% divergence) in the same gene distin- as listed in the ‘‘Acknowledgements’’. The Mahone Bay population guishing Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic individuals of the represents an extension of the northern limit to the species’ Atlantic hermit crab Pagurus pollicaris, which is also disjunct range, previously reported as Chignecto Bay between New Bruns- wick and Nova Scotia (Williams 1984). around southern Florida (Cunningham et al. 1992). This To place this study in a larger context, four other species were large difference in genetic divergence is consistent with a collected for the purposes of mtDNA analysis. These included hypothesis that these two hermit crab species have samples from Woods Hole, Massachusetts, and Apalachee Bay, experienced vicariance events at different times. Cases in Florida, of Pagurus pollicaris, whose distribution is similar to that which taxa have identical disjunctions, but have expe- of P. longicarpus, as well as three northern species belonging to the bernhardus group of hermit crabs (McLaughlin 1974), which par- rienced vicariance at different times have been called ticipated in the trans-Arctic interchange ca. 3.5 million years ago examples of ‘‘pseudocongruence’’ (Page 1990; Cunn- (Vermeij 1991): Pagurus armatus (Bering Sea), Pagurus acadianus ingham and Collins 1994). (Damariscotta River, Maine), and Pagurus bernhardus (Roscoff, One possibility is that 16 S mtDNA is simply evolv- France). Live crabs were removed from their shells, and approximately ing too slowly to detect the divergence between Gulf of 100–200 ll of crab abdomen tissue was preserved in 1 ml 95% Mexico and Atlantic populations of P. longicarpus, but ethanol for examination of DNA signatures. Right chelipeds and one cannot rule out the possibility that, despite the third maxillipeds were removed and preserved in a mixture of 70% disjunction across southern Florida, there has been ethanol plus glycerol for 2 weeks, transferred to 90% ethanol for 1 week, and then maintained in 100% ethanol for examination by recent gene flow between the Gulf of Mexico and the scanning electron microscopy; two walking legs from each crab Atlantic. In order to distinguish between these possibil- were preserved in 70% ethanol for length and width measurements. ities – and in addition to detailed morphological com- The remainder of each crab was homogenized in 1 ml grinding Fig. 1. Pagurus longicarpus. Distribution (shaded regions) and locations of populations used in the study (NS Mahone Bay, Nova Scotia; M Damaris- cotta River, Maine; S Salem Harbor, Massachusetts; W Woods Hole, Massachusetts; NC Beaufort, North Carolina; SC North Inlet, South Caroli- na; F Sarasota Bay, Florida; P Apalachee Bay, Florida; T Galveston Bay, Texas) 1061 buffer (1.21 g Tris, 0.030 g EDTA, 0.040 g NADP, 0.033 g NAD Perkin-Elmer 9600 thermocycler, in 10 l reactions containing 5 ll per 100 ml distilled water) and centrifuged for 1–2 min. Individual DNA, 1 mM primer, 3 ll Big Dye buffer and 1 ll Big Dye ter- 50 ll aliquots of supernatant were frozen in 1.5 ml Eppendorf minator (Perkin-Elmer), with a profile of 25 cycles of 96°C (10 s)/ tubes at –80°C for allozyme electrophoresis. 50°C (5 s)/60°C (240 s). Unincorporated di-deoxynucleotides were removed
Recommended publications
  • Draft Dike Rock Managment Plan May 2015-JES-MS 06.06.15
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
    [Show full text]
  • On the Larval Development of Some Hermit Crabs from Hokkaido, Japan, Reared Under Laboratory Conditions Title (Decapoda : Anomura) (With 33 Text-Figures and 7 Tables)
    On the Larval Development of Some Hermit Crabs from Hokkaido, Japan, Reared Under Laboratory Conditions Title (Decapoda : Anomura) (With 33 Text-figures and 7 Tables) Author(s) QUINTANA, Rodolfo; IWATA, Fumio Citation 北海道大學理學部紀要, 25(1), 25-85 Issue Date 1987-10 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/27702 Type bulletin (article) File Information 25(1)_P25-85.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP On the Larval Development of Some Hermit Crabs from Hokkaido, Japan, Reared Under Laboratory Conditions (Decapoda: Anomura) By Rodolfo Quintana and Fumio Iwata Zoological Institute, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060, Japan. (With 33 Text-figures and 7 Tables) Introduction Descriptive accounts of larvae of a number of Diogenidae and Paguridae species from different geographic regions have been given -among others-, by MacDonald, Pike and Williamson, (1957); Pike and Williamson (1960); Proven­ zano (1963; 1968a ); Makarov (1967); Roberts (1970; 1973); Biffar and Proven­ zano (1972); Nyblade and McLaughlin (1975); Hong (1981), but our knowledge of larvae of species of both families from Japan is still deficient. The list of anomuran crabs inhabiting the coasts of Hokkaido, northern Japan includes approximately 15 species of hermit crabs (Igarashi, 1970; Miyake, 1982), for which only some reports have been published on their larval stages, so that the larvae of several of these species (especially those of the genus Paguristes and approximately the 50% of the Pagurus species) remain so far unknown. Kurata (1964) described the larvae of several Pagurus species from the coasts of Hokkaido. In his carefully constructed plankton study, using mainly character- 1) Contribution No.1 from the Oshoro Marine Biological Station, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University.
    [Show full text]
  • SCAMIT Newsletter Vol. 8 No. 10 1990 February
    Southern California Association of Marine Invertebrate Taxonomists 3720 Stephen White Drive San Pedro, California 90731 f frEBRMt February 1990 Vol. 8, No. 10 NEXT MEETING: Photis Workshop GUEST SPEAKERS SCAMIT Members DATE: Monday, 12 March 1990, 9:30 AM LOCATION; Cabrillo Marine Museum 3720 Stephen White Drive San Pedro, CA 90731 MINUTES FROM MEETING ON FEBRUARY 12, 1990 Pa 9H.r i d Meeting: Ms. Janet Haig, Allan Han cock Fou ndat ion, University of Southern California, hosted the pagu rid meet ing. Several problems concerning pagurid identi fication wer e di scussed. Ms. Haig agreed with us that several corre ctions a nd a ddit ions, listed in the previous newsletter, need to be made to the key (Haig, J. 1977. A preliminary key to the hermit c rabs of Cali- fornia. Proc. Taxonomic Standardization P rogram, So. Cali f. Coastal Water Research Project, Vol. 5, No . 2, pp. 13-22) . Don Cadien, Los Angeles County Sanitation Dist ricts, a gree d to rewri te this key, and Dean Pasko, Pt. Loma/City of San Die go, and Mas Dojiri, Hyperion Treatment Plant, plan to illustra te t he c haracters included in the key. Many of these illust rations will be gleaned from the literature, but a few, by necessi ty, will be or ig inal . When completed, the illustrated key to the species of Cali fornia hermit crabs will be distributed to SCAMIT members S CAM IT grate- fully acknowledges Janet Haig for hosting the meet ing and f o r her helpful suggestions on the key.
    [Show full text]
  • To Down Load Appendix 1
    APPENDIX 1 Chapter 1 Pictures of dominant species ................................................................................................................................. 2 Species inventory of micro-invertebrate species found ....................................................................................... 16 Bathymetry Map of Pleasant Bay ........................................................................................................................ 18 Eelgrass Locations in Pleasant Bay ..................................................................................................................... 19 Sidescan Map of Pleasant Bay ............................................................................................................................. 20 Chapter 2 Species inventory of macro-invertebrate and fish species by gear type .............................................................. 21 Chapter 3 Prey otoliths and hard parts recovered during seal scat processing ..................................................................... 24 1 Pictures of dominant species Disclaimer: biological samples were treated with ethanol and Rose Bengal in the laboratory to preserve the samples. Rose Bengal is a stain commonly used in microscopy and stains cell tissue a bright pink. This is useful in the visual detection of microscopic animals in sediment samples. An overwhelming majority of micro invertebrate species do not have common names. The common names used here are listed in Pollock’s “A Practical Guide
    [Show full text]
  • Hepatopancreatic Endosymbionts in Coastal Isopods (Crustacea: Isopoda)
    Marine Biology 2001) 138: 955±963 Ó Springer-Verlag 2001 M. Zimmer á J. P. Danko á S. C. Pennings A. R. Danford á A. Ziegler á R. F. Uglow á T. H. Carefoot Hepatopancreatic endosymbionts in coastal isopods Crustacea: Isopoda), and their contribution to digestion Received: 28 August 2000 / Accepted: 8 December 2000 Abstract Three isopod species Crustacea: Isopoda), phenolic compounds was most developed in one of the commonly found in the intertidal and supratidal zones more marine species, suggesting that this trait may have of the North American Paci®c coast, were studied with evolved independently in isopod species that consume a respect to symbiotic microbiota in their midgut glands phenolic-rich diet, whether in marine habitats or on hepatopancreas). Ligia pallasii Oniscidea: Ligiidae) land. contained high numbers of microbialsymbionts in its hepatopancreatic caeca. Numbers of endosymbionts were strongly reduced by ingestion of antibiotics. By contrast, Introduction the hepatopancreas of Idotea wosnesenskii Valvifera: Idoteidae) and Gnorimosphaeroma oregonense Sphae- Endosymbionts are well known to play a key role in the romatidea: Sphaeromatidae) did not contain any mic- digestive processes of many terrestrialspecies summa- robiota. Results of feeding experiments suggest that rized in Martin 1983; Slaytor 1992; Breznak and Brune microbialendosymbionts contribute to digestive pro- 1994); however, their role in marine invertebrate species cesses in L. pallasii, the most terrestrialof the three is poorly understood. While studies have shown that gut isopods that we studied. The acquisition of digestion- microbiota exist in some marine invertebrates, know- enhancing endosymbionts may have been an important ledge of their nutritional role is scanty cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Synidotea Laevidorsalis Potential in RI COASTAL WATERS Asian Isopod Invader
    GUIDE TO MARINE INVADERS Synidotea laevidorsalis Potential IN RI COASTAL WATERS Asian isopod Invader PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION • Small, flattened (from top to bottom), crustacean (Isopoda) • Body color mottled tan to brown • Body elongated, widest in middle (thorax), with females slightly wider than males • Blunt, concave tail (telson) • Can grow to 1.2 in (3 cm) in length eyes located on Synidotea laevidorsalis lateral surface (dorsal view, female) of head shown at 200% actual size SERTC / SCDNR SERTC Left: Dorsal view of female Above: Dorsal view of male body widest at central thorax HABITAT PREFERENCE 7 pairs of • Found in shallow, subtidal waters attached to docks, appendages pilings, ropes, and other submerged structures • Prefers calm, protected waters; brackish water to full seawater 1 cm concave telson • Often clings to algae and hydroids with 2 blunt points © Rob Gough, DFBW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 GUIDE TO MARINE INVADERS Synidotea laevidorsalis Potential IN RI COASTAL WATERS Asian isopod Invader INVASION STATUS & ECOLOGICAL CONCERNS Synidotea laevidorsalis is native to the Western Pacific Ocean and has been introduced to Europe, South America, Australia, and the United States, including San Francisco Bay, South Carolina, and the Delaware Bayshore of New Jersey. A marine isopod, S. laevidorsalis must be submerged in water to breathe. S. laevidorsalis grows to about 3 cm in length and can be found on docks and pilings among seaweed and hydroids. This isopod is classified as an omnivorous scavenger, eating both dead and living material, particularly hydroids. The camouflage pattern on its body allows it to blend in with its environment, and the tiny claws on each leg help it cling to surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Role of Marine Intertidal Hermit Crabs in California
    Swarms of swift scavengers: ecological role of marine intertidal hermit crabs in California Mark E. Laidre1* and Alison L. Greggor1 1Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley Running title: Swarms of swift scavengers Word count Abstract: 241 Main text (including references): 5,475 With 2 Tables and 4 Figures Electronic Supplementary Material (4 Supplementary Figures) *Corresponding author address: Department of Biological Sciences Dartmouth College The Class of 1978 Life Sciences Center 78 College Street Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (609) 751-8041, Fax: +1 (603) 646-1347 Email: [email protected] 1 Abstract 2 While marine hermit crabs are well known for being omnivorous filter feeders, less is 3 known about the role they may play as active carrion scavengers in intertidal ecosystems. 4 Prior studies have revealed that intertidal hermit crabs can be attracted to chemical cues 5 from predated gastropods. Yet their attraction is usually assumed to be driven primarily 6 by the availability of new shells rather than by food. We conducted field experiments to 7 assess hermit crabs’ potential role as generalist carrion scavengers on the California 8 coast, examining their speed of attraction and the size of the aggregations they formed in 9 response to chemical cues from freshly smashed gastropods and mussels, both of which 10 indicated available carrion. Compared to all other marine species, hermit crabs (including 11 Pagurus samuelis, Pagurus hirsutiusculus, and Pagurus granosimanus) were the fastest 12 to arrive at the provisioning sites, and they also dominated the provisioning sites, forming 13 aggregations of up to 20 individuals, which outcompeted all other scavengers for carrion.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Benthic Assessment of Marine Areas of Particular
    Chapter 8 Benthic assessment of marine areas of particular ecological importance within the German Baltic Sea EEZ Michael L. Zettlera and Fritz Gosselckb a Baltic Sea Research Institute, Rostock b Institute for Applied Ecology, Broderstorf Abstract The Habitats Directive is one of the main legal tools of the European Union to preserve biodiversity by maintaining and restoring natural habitats, and establishing a network of protected sites (NATURA 2000). One point of interest is the characterisation of marine habitats to localise the areas that fulfil the protection targets. Of the habitats listed in Annex I of the Habitats Directive, mainly reefs and sandbanks are relevant in the case of German Baltic offshore waters. Along a strong salinity gradient (5 to 25 psu), four planned offshore Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) within the German Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of the Baltic Sea were thoroughly investigated in this study. More than 250 locations were analysed using a combination of standard sampling methods, underwater video technique, and measurement of abiotic factors (salinity, oxygen, sediment parameters). The areas of interest were the Odra Bank (Oderbank), Adler Ground (Adlergrund), Kadet Trench (Kadetrinne), and Fehmarn Belt (Fehmarnbelt). The characteristic living communities (macrophytes, such as algae and sea grass, and macrozoobenthos such as worms, bivalves and crustaceans) for the different habitat types in these areas were characterised. Due to different salinity regimes, the benthic colonisation is different as well. In the Baltic Sea, with its decreasing salinity from west to east, the number of marine species declines, too. In the present study, altogether approximately 350 macrozoobenthic species and approximately 20 macrophytes were identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrimps, Lobsters, and Crabs of the Atlantic Coast of the Eastern United States, Maine to Florida
    SHRIMPS, LOBSTERS, AND CRABS OF THE ATLANTIC COAST OF THE EASTERN UNITED STATES, MAINE TO FLORIDA AUSTIN B.WILLIAMS SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS Washington, D.C. 1984 © 1984 Smithsonian Institution. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Williams, Austin B. Shrimps, lobsters, and crabs of the Atlantic coast of the Eastern United States, Maine to Florida. Rev. ed. of: Marine decapod crustaceans of the Carolinas. 1965. Bibliography: p. Includes index. Supt. of Docs, no.: SI 18:2:SL8 1. Decapoda (Crustacea)—Atlantic Coast (U.S.) 2. Crustacea—Atlantic Coast (U.S.) I. Title. QL444.M33W54 1984 595.3'840974 83-600095 ISBN 0-87474-960-3 Editor: Donald C. Fisher Contents Introduction 1 History 1 Classification 2 Zoogeographic Considerations 3 Species Accounts 5 Materials Studied 8 Measurements 8 Glossary 8 Systematic and Ecological Discussion 12 Order Decapoda , 12 Key to Suborders, Infraorders, Sections, Superfamilies and Families 13 Suborder Dendrobranchiata 17 Infraorder Penaeidea 17 Superfamily Penaeoidea 17 Family Solenoceridae 17 Genus Mesopenaeiis 18 Solenocera 19 Family Penaeidae 22 Genus Penaeus 22 Metapenaeopsis 36 Parapenaeus 37 Trachypenaeus 38 Xiphopenaeus 41 Family Sicyoniidae 42 Genus Sicyonia 43 Superfamily Sergestoidea 50 Family Sergestidae 50 Genus Acetes 50 Family Luciferidae 52 Genus Lucifer 52 Suborder Pleocyemata 54 Infraorder Stenopodidea 54 Family Stenopodidae 54 Genus Stenopus 54 Infraorder Caridea 57 Superfamily Pasiphaeoidea 57 Family Pasiphaeidae 57 Genus
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate ID Guide
    11/13/13 1 This book is a compilation of identification resources for invertebrates found in stomach samples. By no means is it a complete list of all possible prey types. It is simply what has been found in past ChesMMAP and NEAMAP diet studies. A copy of this document is stored in both the ChesMMAP and NEAMAP lab network drives in a folder called ID Guides, along with other useful identification keys, articles, documents, and photos. If you want to see a larger version of any of the images in this document you can simply open the file and zoom in on the picture, or you can open the original file for the photo by navigating to the appropriate subfolder within the Fisheries Gut Lab folder. Other useful links for identification: Isopods http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-33/htm/doc.html http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-48/htm/doc.html Polychaetes http://web.vims.edu/bio/benthic/polychaete.html http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-34/htm/doc.html Cephalopods http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-44/htm/doc.html Amphipods http://www.19thcenturyscience.org/HMSC/HMSC-Reports/Zool-67/htm/doc.html Molluscs http://www.oceanica.cofc.edu/shellguide/ http://www.jaxshells.org/slife4.htm Bivalves http://www.jaxshells.org/atlanticb.htm Gastropods http://www.jaxshells.org/atlantic.htm Crustaceans http://www.jaxshells.org/slifex26.htm Echinoderms http://www.jaxshells.org/eich26.htm 2 PROTOZOA (FORAMINIFERA) ................................................................................................................................ 4 PORIFERA (SPONGES) ............................................................................................................................................... 4 CNIDARIA (JELLYFISHES, HYDROIDS, SEA ANEMONES) ............................................................................... 4 CTENOPHORA (COMB JELLIES)............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Interim Receiving Waters Monitoring Report
    POINT LOMA OCEAN OUTFALL MONTHLY RECEIVING WATERS INTERIM RECEIVING WATERS MONITORING REPORT FOR THE POINTM ONITORINGLOMA AND SOUTH R EPORTBAY OCEAN OUTFALLS POINT LOMA 2020 WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT NPDES Permit No. CA0107409 SDRWQCB Order No. R9-2017-0007 APRIL 2021 Environmental Monitoring and Technical Services 2392 Kincaid Road x Mail Station 45A x San Diego, CA 92101 Tel (619) 758-2300 Fax (619) 758-2309 INTERIM RECEIVING WATERS MONITORING REPORT FOR THE POINT LOMA AND SOUTH BAY OCEAN OUTFALLS 2020 POINT LOMA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT (ORDER NO. R9-2017-0007; NPDES NO. CA0107409) SOUTH BAY WATER RECLAMATION PLANT (ORDER NO. R9-2013-0006 AS AMENDED; NPDES NO. CA0109045) SOUTH BAY INTERNATIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT (ORDER NO. R9-2014-0009 AS AMENDED; NPDES NO. CA0108928) Prepared by: City of San Diego Ocean Monitoring Program Environmental Monitoring & Technical Services Division Ryan Kempster, Editor Ami Latker, Editor June 2021 Table of Contents Production Credits and Acknowledgements ...........................................................................ii Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................1 A. Latker, R. Kempster Chapter 1. General Introduction ............................................................................................3 A. Latker, R. Kempster Chapter 2. Water Quality .......................................................................................................15 S. Jaeger, A. Webb, R. Kempster,
    [Show full text]
  • Ix. References
    IX. REFERENCES BAXTER, K. N., C. H. FURR, JR., and E. SCOTT. 1988. The commercial bait shrimp fishery in Galveston Bay, Texas, 1959-87. Mar. Fish. Rev., 50(2):20- 28. BESSETTE, C. 1985. Growth, distribution and abundance of juvenile penaeid shrimp in Galveston Bay. M.S. Thesis submitted to University of Houston, Department of Biology. Houston, TX. 132 p. BLACKBURN, C. J., and S. K. DAVIS. 1992. Bycatch in the Alaska region: Problems and management measures ~ historic and current. In, R. W. Schoning, R.W. Jacobson, D. L. Alverson, T. H. Gentle, and J. Auyong (editors), Proceedings Of The National Industry Bycatch Workshop, February 4-6, 1992, Newport, OR. Natural Resources Consultants. Seattle, WA. pp. 88-105. CAMPBELL, R. P., C. HONS, and L. M. GREEN. 1991. Trends in fmfish landings of sport-boat anglers in Texas marine waters, May 1974 - May 1990. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Management Data Ser. No. 75. 209 p. DAILEY, J. A., J. C. KANA, AND L. W. MCEACHRON. 1991. Trends in relative abundance of selected finfishes and shellfishes along the Texas Coast: November 1975 - December 1990. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Management Data Ser. No. 74, 128 p. DE DIEGO, M.E. 1984. Description of three ecology studies on brown shrimp Penaeus aztecus and white shrimp P. setiferus conducted by the National Marine Fisheries Service, Galveston, Texas. Paper submitted in partial fulfillment of M. Ag. Thesis. Texas A&M University, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Science (Aquaculture). December 1984. 30 pp. DIVITA, R., M. CREEL, and P. F. SHERIDAN. 1983. Foods of coastal fishes during brown shrimp Penaeus aztecus, migration frm Texas estuaries (June - July 1981).
    [Show full text]