DOCSLIB.ORG

Ariel Pakes' Doctoral and Post-Doctoral Students. (Initial Placement Is an Economics Department Unless Otherwise Specified.) S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ariel Pakes' Doctoral and Post-Doctoral Students. (Initial Placement Is an Economics Department Unless Otherwise Specified.) S Ariel Pakes' Doctoral and Post-Doctoral Students. (Initial placement is an economics department unless otherwise specified.) Students Who Graduated From Wisconsin. 1. Steven Berry, 1989. Initial Placement: Yale University. 2. Steven Olley, 1992. Initial Placement: New York University. 3. Margaret Simpson, 1992. Initial Placement: Williams and Mary. Students Who Graduated From Yale. 1. Samuel Kortum, 1992. Initial Placement: Boston University. 2. Plutarchos Sakellaris, 1992. Initial Placement: University of Maryland. 3. Brian Fikkert, 1993. Initial Placement: University of Maryland. 4. Gautam Gowrisankaran, 1995. Initial Placement: University of Min- nesota. 5. Sangin Park, 1996. Initial Placement: State University of New York, Stony Brook. 6. Gylfi Magnusson, 1997. Initial Placement: University of Iceland. 7. Johnathan Putnam, 1996. Initial Placement: Charles River Associates. 8. Javier Alvarado-Chapa, 1997. Initial Placement: Mexican Govern- ment. 9. Daniel Ackerberg, 1997. Initial Placement: Boston University. 10. Jorge Portillo, 1997. Initial Placement: Resources for the Future. 11. David Prentice, 1997. Inital Placement: University of Melbourne. 12. Lanier Benkard, 1998. Initial Placement: Stanford University (GSB). 13. Sofronis Clerides, 1998. Initial Placement: University of Cyprus. 1 14. Gillian Currie, 1998. Initial Placement: The University of Calgary (Pharmacology). 15. Nadia Soboleva, 1998. Initial Placement: University of Toronto. 16. Peter Davis, 1999. Initial Placement: M.I.T. (SloanSchool). 17. Phil Leslie, 1999. Initial Placement: UCLA. 18. Oleg Melnikov, 1999. Initial Placement: Cornell University. 19. Ron Goettler, 1999. Inital Placement: Tepper - Carnegie Mellon. 20. Nicholas de Roos, 2001. Initial Placement: Bates and White. 21. Eugene Choo, 2001. Initial Placement: University of Toronto 22. Hui Man Chan, 2002. Initial Placement: CRA. 23. Yi Deng, 2003. Initial Placement: Southern Methodist University. Students Who Graduated From Harvard. 1. Igal Hendel, 1994. Initial Placement: Princeton University. 2. Liran Einav, 2002. Initial Placement: Stanford University. 3. Minjae Song, 2003. Initial Placement: Georgia Tech. 4. John Asker, 2004. Initial Placement: NYU Stern School. 5. Matthew Gentzkow, 2004. Initial Placement: University of Chicago (GSB). 6. Kate Ho, 2005. Initial Placement: Columbia University. 7. Michael Ostrovsky, 2005. Initial Placement: Stanford University (GSB). 8. Joy Ishii, 2005. Initial Placement: Stanford University (GSB). 9. David Blackburn, 2005. Initial Placement: NERA. 10. Catherine Thomas, 2006. Initial Placement: Columbia University (GSB). 2 11. Ben Edelman, 2007. Initial Placement: Harvard Business School. 12. Emi Nakamura, 2007. Initial Placement: Columbia University (GSB). 13. Parag Pathak, 2007. Initial Placement: MIT Economics. 14. Michael Katz, 2007. Initial Placement: AQR Funds. 15. Robin Lee, 2008. Initial Placement: NYU Stern School. 16. Dmitri Byzalov, 2009. Initial Placement: Temple University (account- ing). 17. Eric Budish, 2009. Initial Placement: University of Chicago (GSB). 18. Gloria Sheu, 2010. Initial Placement: Department of Justice. 19. Michael Dickstein, 2011. Initial Placement: Stanford University. 20. Eduardo Morales, 2011. Initial Placement: Columbia University. 21. Christopher Nosko, 2011. Initial Placement: University of Chicago, (GSB). 22. Amanda Starc, 2011. Initial Placement: University of Pennsylvania, Wharton. 23. Michael Sinkinson, 2012. Initial Placement: University of Pennsylva- nia, Wharton. 24. Jacob Leshno, 2012. Initial Placement: Columbia University, GSB. 25. Nikhil Agarwal, 2013. Initial Placement: MIT Economics. 26. Rebecca Diamond, 2013. Initial placement: Stanford GSB. 27. Thomas Covert, 2014. Initial Placement: Chicago GSB. 28. Dan Bjorkegren, 2014. Initial Placement: Brown Economics. 29. Fanyin Zheng, 2015. Initial Placement: Columbia GSB. 30. Richard Sweeney, 2015. Initial Placement: Boston College, Economics. 3 31. Thomas Wollmann, 2015. Initial Placement: Chicago GSB. 32. Mark Shepard, 2015. Initial Placement: Harvard Kennedy School. 33. Zhenyu Lai, 2015. Initial Placement: Wayfair. 34. Pavel Kireyev, 2016. Initial Placement INSEAD. 35. Jing Li, 2017. Initial Placement, Sloan School, MIT. 36. Daniel Pollmann, 2017. Initial Placement, QuantCo. 37. Cuicui Chen, 2018. Initial Placement, University at Albany - State University of New York 38. Todd Gerarden, 2018. Initial Placement, Cornell University's Dyson School 39. Luca Maini, 2018. Initial Placement, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 40. Josh Feng, 2018. Initial Placement, University of Utah { Eccles School of Business 41. Shoshana Vasserman, 2019. Initial Placement, Stanford GSB 42. Ashvin Gandhi, 2019. Initial Placement, UCLA Anderson School of Management 43. Yizhou Jin, 2019. Initial Placement, U of Toronto, Rotman School of Business (after a 2 year post doc at Berkeley). 44. Sophie Calder-Wang, 2020. Initial Placement, Wharton. 45. Nir Hak, 2020. Initial Placement, Uber. 46. Nicola Rosaia, 2021. Initial Placement, Columbia Unversity, Graduate School of Business 47. Allen Zhang, 2021. Initial Placement, Uber. Students Who Graduated From Leuven 1. Jan De Loecker, 2006. Initial Placement: NYU (Stern School). 4 Students Who Graduated From NYU. 1. Ali Yurukoglu, 2009. Initial Placement: Stanford GSB. 2. Niyati Ahuja, 2009. Initial Placement: University of Scranton, Eco- nomics. 3. Jihye Jeon, 2017. Initial Placement: Boston University, Economics. Post Doctoral Students. 1. Joseph Cullen, 2009, (placement is Washington University). 2. Eduardo Souza-Rodrigues, 2012, (placement University of Toronto). 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Functional Forms for Tractable Economic Models and the Cost Structure of International Trade∗
    Functional Forms for Tractable Economic Models and the Cost Structure of International Trade∗ Michal Fabingery E. Glen Weylz August 2018 Abstract We present functional forms allowing a broader range of analytic solutions to common economic equilibrium problems. These can increase the realism of pen-and-paper solutions or speed large-scale numerical solutions as computational subroutines. We use the latter approach to build a tractable heterogeneous firm model of international trade accommodating economies of scale in export and diseconomies of scale in production, providing a natural, unified solution to several puzzles concerning trade costs. We briefly highlight applications in a range of other fields. Our method of generating analytic solutions is a discrete approximation to a logarithmically modified Laplace transform of equilibrium conditions. arXiv:1611.02270v2 [q-fin.EC] 18 Aug 2018 ∗This paper replaces its previous working versions \Pass-Through and Demand Forms"/\A Tractable Approach to Pass-Through Patterns"/\The Average-Marginal Relationship and Tractable Equilibrium Forms". We are grateful to many colleagues and seminar participants for helpful comments. We appreciate the research assistance of Konstantin Egorov, Eric Guan, Franklin Liu, Eva Lyubich, Yali Miao, Daichi Ueda, Ryo Takahashi, Huan Wang, and Xichao Wang. This research was funded by the Kauffman Foundation, the Becker Friedman Institute for Research in Economics, the Japan Science and Technology Agency and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science to which we are grateful. We are particularly indebted to Jeremy Bulow for detailed discussion and for inspiring this work and to James Heckman for advice on relevant theorems in duration analysis and nonparametric estimation.
    [Show full text]
  • TECHNOLOGY and GROWTH: an OVERVIEW Jeffrey C
    Y Proceedings GY Conference Series No. 40 Jeffrey C. Fuhrer Jane Sneddon Little Editors CONTENTS TECHNOLOGY AND GROWTH: AN OVERVIEW Jeffrey C. Fuhrer and Jane Sneddon Little KEYNOTE ADDRESS: THE NETWORKED BANK 33 Robert M. Howe TECHNOLOGY IN GROWTH THEORY Dale W. Jorgenson Discussion 78 Susanto Basu Gene M. Grossman UNCERTAINTY AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE 91 Nathan Rosenberg Discussion 111 Joel Mokyr Luc L.G. Soete CROSS-COUNTRY VARIATIONS IN NATIONAL ECONOMIC GROWTH RATES," THE ROLE OF aTECHNOLOGYtr 127 J. Bradford De Long~ Discussion 151 Jeffrey A. Frankel Adam B. Jaffe ADDRESS: JOB ~NSECURITY AND TECHNOLOGY173 Alan Greenspan MICROECONOMIC POLICY AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE 183 Edwin Mansfield Discnssion 201 Samuel S. Kortum Joshua Lerner TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION IN U.S. MANUFACTURING: THE GEOGRAPHIC DIMENSION 215 Jane Sneddon Little and Robert K. Triest Discussion 260 John C. Haltiwanger George N. Hatsopoulos PANEL DISCUSSION 269 Trends in Productivity Growth 269 Martin Neil Baily Inherent Conflict in International Trade 279 Ralph E. Gomory Implications of Growth Theory for Macro-Policy: What Have We Learned? 286 Abel M. Mateus The Role of Macroeconomic Policy 298 Robert M. Solow About the Authors Conference Participants 309 TECHNOLOGY AND GROWTH: AN OVERVIEW Jeffrey C. Fuhrer and Jane Sneddon Little* During the 1990s, the Federal Reserve has pursued its twin goals of price stability and steady employment growth with considerable success. But despite--or perhaps because of--this success, concerns about the pace of economic and productivity growth have attracted renewed attention. Many observers ruefully note that the average pace of GDP growth has remained below rates achieved in the 1960s and that a period of rapid investment in computers and other capital equipment has had disappointingly little impact on the productivity numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • National Letter in Support of Federal All-Payer Claims Database
    National Letter in Support of Federal All-Payer Claims Database As health scholars, leaders of health organizations, and funders of health research, we are writing in support of establishing a federal all-payer claims database (APCD). APCDs regularly collect data on health insurance claims from all of the payers in a given area (typically a state). Because they include demographic and diagnostic data on patients as well as any treatment or drug paid for by insurance (private or public), APCDs can be immensely valuable for research. APCDs have been used by health scholars to study numerous issues about quality and cost, including the extent of long-term opioid use after surgery, the ability of Medicaid patients to access physicians, the amount of wasted medical spending ending on low-value care, the performance of new models to reduce health spending (such as patient-centered medical home programs), the rate of complications after routine surgeries, and the characteristics of the highest-cost Medicaid patients. In 2016, however, the Supreme Court rendered it all but impossible for states to establish comprehensive APCDs, on the grounds that the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) preempted states from requiring reporting by self-insured health plans. As noted in the Journal of the American Medical Association, this Supreme Court decision has “far-reaching implications for the ability of states to access comprehensive health information to inform policy making.” In May 2019, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee released a draft of the Lower Health Care Costs Act. Among other things, that Act would amend ERISA to create a federal APCD whose data would be available to “researchers and policymakers.” While we are not all able to take a position on specific federal legislation, we can all agree that a national APCD would be an enormous leap forward for the ability of health researchers to study the cost and quality of medical care across the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporter NATIONAL BUREAU of ECONOMIC RESEARCH
    NBER Reporter NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH A quarterly summary of NBER research No. 4, December 2017 Program Report ALSO IN THIS ISSUE Employment Changes for Cognitive Occupations, 2000–2012 Industrial Organization Percentage change in STEM and other managerial or professional occupations -20 0 20 40 60 * Teachers (K-12) Liran Einav and Jonathan Levin Managers (All) Nurses Health Technicians Health Therapists Comp. Sci./Programming/Tech. Support Accounting And Finance Economists & Survey Researchers Social Workers, Counselors & Clergy Physicians College Instructors Researchers in the Program on Industrial Organization (IO) study Lawyers and Judges Other Business Support consumer and firm behavior, competition, innovation, and govern- Operations Researchers Physicians' Assistants Medical Scientists ment regulation. This report begins with a brief summary of general Legal Assistants and Paralegals Pharmacists developments in the last three decades in the range and focus of pro- Dental Hygienists Mathematicians/Statisticians/Actuaries gram members’ research, then discusses specific examples of recent Dentists Social Scientists And Urban Planners Artists, Entertainers, and Athletes work. Marketing, Advertising and PR Pilots/Air Traic Control When the program was launched in the early 1990s, two devel- Biological Scientists Physical Scientists Architects opments had profoundly shaped IO research. One was development Writers, Editors, and Reporters Engineering And Science Technicians of game-theoretic models of strategic behavior by firms with market Draers And Surveyors 1 Engineers (All) power, summarized in Jean Tirole’s classic textbook. The initial wave -20 0 20 40 60 of research in this vein was focused on applying new insights from eco- Source: D. Deming, NBER Working Paper No. 21473 nomic theory; empirical applications came later.
    [Show full text]
  • We, the Undersigned Economists, Represent a Broad Variety of Areas of Expertise and Are United in Our Opposition to Donald Trump
    We, the undersigned economists, represent a broad variety of areas of expertise and are united in our opposition to Donald Trump. We recommend that voters choose a different candidate on the following grounds: . He degrades trust in vital public institutions that collect and disseminate information about the economy, such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics, by spreading disinformation about the integrity of their work. He has misled voters in states like Ohio and Michigan by asserting that the renegotiation of NAFTA or the imposition of tariffs on China would substantially increase employment in manufacturing. In fact, manufacturing’s share of employment has been declining since the 1970s and is mostly related to automation, not trade. He claims to champion former manufacturing workers, but has no plan to assist their transition to well-compensated service sector positions. Instead, he has diverted the policy discussion to options that ignore both the reality of technological progress and the benefits of international trade. He has misled the public by asserting that U.S. manufacturing has declined. The location and product composition of manufacturing has changed, but the level of output has more than doubled in the U.S. since the 1980s. He has falsely suggested that trade is zero-sum and that the “toughness” of negotiators primarily drives trade deficits. He has misled the public with false statements about trade agreements eroding national income and wealth. Although the gains have not been equally distributed—and this is an important discussion in itself—both mean income and mean wealth have risen substantially in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • INAUGURAL CARIBBEAN HEALTH ECONOMICS SYMPOSIUM Bitter
    INAUGURAL CARIBBEAN HEALTH ECONOMICS SYMPOSIUM Bitter End Yacht Club Virgin Gorda, British Virgin Islands Agenda – As of December 8, 2015 Sunday, December 13, 2015 Pre-Symposium Necker Island Tour Tour of Richard Branson’s personal island and nature park: 1:00pm to 3:30pm Personal invite from the Richard with opportunity to meet him personally at end of tour. Space is limited. Will leave from BEYC dock on symposia boats or motor launch to Necker Island. Welcome reception, 6:00pm, BEYC Town & Gown Exchange, 7:00pm, BEYC “Publications, Patents and Privacy: Holy Trinity or Bermuda Triangle of Health Economics Research”: Informal forum between policy makers, academics and industry Monday, December 14, 2014 Breakfast at BEYC 7:00 to 8:30 Paper - 8:30 to 9:30: Switching Costs and Plan Loyalty in Medicare Part C. Adam Atherly, University of Colorado, Denver Roger Feldman, University of Minnesota Bryan Dowd, University of Minnesota E. Van den Broek, University of Colorado, Denver Paper - 9:30 to 10:30: Insurer Competition in Health Care Markets Kate Ho, Columbia University Robin S. Lee, Harvard University Coffee and electronic catch-up 10:30 to 11:00 Paper - 11:00 to Noon: Marginal Treatment Effects and the External Validity of the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment Amanda Kowalski, Yale University Afternoon choices and preferences o Afternoon Activities arranged independently by BEYC staff - OR - o Sail excursion to The Baths on Virgin Gorda (with a possible race back) Happy Hour Town & Gown Exchange, 7:00pm, BEYC Has pharmacoeconomics lost its way? Panel discussion featuring work from Andrew Briggs (Glasgow, UK), Adrian Levy (Dalhousie, Canada) and David Henry (Toronto, Canada) paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This
    25th Annual Health Economics Conference (A H E C) Thursday ± F riday, October 16-17, 2014 Dore Commons, Baker Institute for Public Policy Agenda General Presentation Timeline: Sessions will last approximately 50 minutes. Speakers will present for 35 minutes, followed by 10 minutes of questions from the discussant and 5 minutes for general questions. Thursday, October 16, 2014 Session 1: Medicare Reform Moderator: Vivian Ho 5LFH8QLYHUVLW\¶V%DNHU,QVWLWXWH 8:15 a.m. BREAKFAST 9:15 a.m. Welcome & Introduction 9LYLDQ+R 5LFH8QLYHUVLW\¶V%DNHUInstitute) 9:30 a.m. ³Does Privatized Health Insurance Benefit Patients or Producers? Evidence from Medicare Advantage´ Authors: Marika Cabral (University of Texas at Austin, presenting), Michael Geruso (University of Texas at Austin), and Neale Mahoney (University of Chicago) Discussant: Jason Abaluck (Yale University) 10:20 a.m. ´7KH,PSDFWRI&RQVXPHU,QDWWHQWLRQRQ,QVXUHU3ULFLng in the Medicare Part D 3URJUDP´ Authors: Kate Ho (Columbia University, presenting), Joseph Hogan (Columbia University), and Fiona Scott Morton (Yale University) Discussant: John Romley (University of Southern California) Paper not available online. 11:10 a.m. BREAK 11:30 a.m. ³Upcoding or Selection? Evidence from Medicare on Squishy Risk Adjustment´ Authors: Michael Geruso (Harvard University, University of Texas at Austin) and Timothy Layton (Harvard Medical School, presenting) Discussant: Colleen Carey (University of Michigan) 12:20 p.m. LUNCH Session 2: Improving Health Outcomes Moderator: Aimee Chin (University of Houston) 1:30
    [Show full text]
  • NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES DO INCREASING MARKUPS MATTER? LESSONS from EMPIRICAL INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION Steven T. Berry Martin Ga
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES DO INCREASING MARKUPS MATTER? LESSONS FROM EMPIRICAL INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION Steven T. Berry Martin Gaynor Fiona Scott Morton Working Paper 26007 http://www.nber.org/papers/w26007 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 June 2019 We wish to thank Al Klevorick and editors at the Journal of Economics Perspectives—Enrico Moretti, Gordon Hanson, and managing editor Tim Taylor—for helpful comments and suggestions that substantially improved the paper. The usual caveat applies. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. At least one co-author has disclosed a financial relationship of potential relevance for this research. Further information is available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w26007.ack NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2019 by Steven T. Berry, Martin Gaynor, and Fiona Scott Morton. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Do Increasing Markups Matter? Lessons from Empirical Industrial Organization Steven T. Berry, Martin Gaynor, and Fiona Scott Morton NBER Working Paper No. 26007 June 2019 JEL No. L0,L1,L4 ABSTRACT This paper considers the recent literature on firm markups in light of both new and classic work in the field of Industrial Organization. We detail the shortcomings of papers that rely on discredited approaches from the “structure-conduct-performance” literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloth for Wine? Strong Justification for Freer Trade
    November 2017 Two hundred years ago, with a simple yet profound example about England trading cloth for Portuguese wine, David Ricardo introduced the Principle of Comparative Advantage. This seemingly counter- intuitive logic not only explained why nations trade, it also provided a Cloth for Wine? strong justification for freer trade. But what is the relevance today of this parable of cloth-for-wine? In this eBook, leading trade policy analysts examine whether Ricardo’s The Relevance of Ricardo’s insights remain valid in a world where services as well as good cross borders as does data and technology, where there is a rising China whose growth is heavily dependent on exports, and in the face of a Comparative Advantage in backlash against globalisation. The contributions to this eBook are non-technical and have implications the 21st Century for policymaking, and can inform debates about how open economies should be to the rest of the world and shape decisions by businesses, civil society, and trade unions. Edited by Simon J. Evenett ISBN 978-1-912179-07-7 Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street London EC1V 0DX Tel: +44 (0)20 7183 8801 Email: [email protected] www.cepr.org 9 781912 179077 CEPR Press CEPR Press Cloth for Wine? The Relevance of Ricardo’s Comparative Advantage in the 21st Century CEPR Press Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street London, EC1V 0DX UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7183 8801 Email: [email protected] Web: www.cepr.org ISBN: 978-1-912179-07-7 Copyright © CEPR Press, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Intelligence and Its Implications for Income Distribution
    Artificial Intelligence and Its Implications ... The Economics of Artifi cial Intelligence National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report The Economics of Artifi cial Intelligence: An Agenda Edited by Ajay Agrawal, Joshua Gans, and Avi Goldfarb The University of Chicago Press Chicago and London The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 2019 by the National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission, except in the case of brief quotations in critical articles and reviews. For more information, contact the University of Chicago Press, 1427 E. 60th St., Chicago, IL 60637. Published 2019 Printed in the United States of America 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 1 2 3 4 5 ISBN-13: 978-0-226-61333-8 (cloth) ISBN-13: 978-0-226-61347-5 (e-book) DOI: https:// doi .org / 10 .7208 / chicago / 9780226613475 .001 .0001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Agrawal, Ajay, editor. | Gans, Joshua, 1968– editor. | Goldfarb, Avi, editor. Title: The economics of artifi cial intelligence : an agenda / Ajay Agrawal, Joshua Gans, and Avi Goldfarb, editors. Other titles: National Bureau of Economic Research conference report. Description: Chicago ; London : The University of Chicago Press, 2019. | Series: National Bureau of Economic Research conference report | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifi ers: LCCN 2018037552 | ISBN 9780226613338 (cloth : alk. paper) | ISBN 9780226613475 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Artifi cial intelligence—Economic aspects. Classifi cation: LCC TA347.A78 E365 2019 | DDC 338.4/ 70063—dc23 LC record available at https:// lccn .loc .gov / 2018037552 ♾ This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/ NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper).
    [Show full text]
  • Leemore S. Dafny
    LEEMORE S. DAFNY www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/dafny/personal Department of Management and Strategy [email protected] Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University (847) 467-7511 (phone) 2001 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois 60208-2001 (847) 467-1777 (fax) EMPLOYMENT AND APPOINTMENTS NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY, KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT Evanston, IL 2012- present Herman Smith Research Professor in Hospital and Health Services, Department of Management and Strategy 2010- present Associate Professor with tenure, Department of Management and Strategy 2002 - 2009 Assistant Professor, Department of Management and Strategy 2003- present Faculty Research Fellow/Associate, Institute for Policy Research NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH Cambridge, MA 2010-present Faculty Research Associate, NBER Programs on Aging and Health Care 2002 - 2009 Faculty Research Fellow, NBER Programs on Aging and Health Care 2001 - 2002 Post-Doctoral Fellow in Health and Aging Economics 1999 - 2000 Pre-Doctoral Fellow in Health and Aging Economics MCKINSEY AND COMPANY Washington, DC 1995 - 1997 Business Analyst. EDUCATION 1997 - 2001 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Cambridge, MA Ph.D. in Economics. Dissertation entitled “The Impact of Market Forces and Public Health Insurance on Inpatient Care.” 1991 - 1995 HARVARD UNIVERSITY Cambridge, MA A.B. in Economics, summa cum laude. HONORS, FELLOWSHIPS, GRANTS 2011 Sidney J. Levy Teaching Award 2010, 2011 Faculty Impact Award for excellence in teaching 2007 - 2008 Searle Center on Law,
    [Show full text]
  • Trapped Factors and China's Impact on Global Growth
    Trapped Factors and China’s Impact on Global Growth Nicholas Bloom, Paul Romer, Stephen J. Terry, John Van Reenen⇤ April 2019 Abstract In response to a recent increase in Chinese import competition, European firms increased their innovation. We present and then rationalize these cross-sectional patterns using “trapped factors” at the micro level within a stylized equilibrium model of product-cycle trade and growth. Trade integration of the magnitude observed between the OECD and low-wage nations as a whole can considerably increase the long-run growth rate and welfare. In the short-run exposed firms devote trapped factors to increased innovation, leading both to in- creased innovation at these firms in the cross section as well as to a small amount of extra transitional growth overall. China alone accounts for half of the dynamic trade gains. Keywords: innovation, trade, China, endogenous growth JEL Classification: D92, E22, D8, C23. ⇤Bloom at Stanford, NBER, and SIEPR, Romer at NYU Stern, Terry at Boston University, and Van Reenen at MIT, the Centre for Economic Performance, and NBER. Correspondence to [email protected]. A code packet to produce the results in this paper can be found at Nicholas Bloom’s website: http://www.stanford.edu/~nbloom/. A summarized version of this paper is available as Bloom et al. (2013a). We thank the ESRC for financial support through the Centre for Economic Performance and the National Science Foundation. We would like to thank our formal discussants, Chad Jones and Michael Sposi as well as Steve Redding and participants in seminars at Harvard, LSE, Philadelphia, San Diego, WEAI Seattle, Stony Brook, the West Coast Trade Workshop, and Stanford.
    [Show full text]