DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment of the Biological Monitoring Plan for San Diego's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessment of the Biological Monitoring Plan for San Diego's Assessment of the Biological Monitoring Plan for San Diego’s Multiple Species Conservation Program Report for Task A of Local Assistance Grant #P0450009 August 2005 Prepared for California Department of Fish and Game Grant Coordinator: Dr. Brenda S. Johnson Prepared by Department of Biology, San Diego State University Lauren A. Hierl, Dr. Helen M. Regan, Dr. Janet Franklin, and Dr. Douglas H. Deutschman Draft – Assessment of the MSCP Biological Monitoring Plan August 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................2 LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................................................5 LIST OF FIGURES.....................................................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................................6 CHAPTER 1: BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................9 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................................9 MULTIPLE SPECIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM .........................................................................................................9 BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN .............................................................................................................................10 PROBLEM STATEMENT .............................................................................................................................................12 CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................................................................13 CHAPTER 2: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES...........................................................................................................15 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................15 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES IDENTIFIED IN MSCP PLANNING DOCUMENTS ................................................................16 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES IDENTIFIED IN BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PLAN ..............................................................17 CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................................................................18 CHAPTER 3: REVIEW OF MONITORING TO DATE ......................................................................................19 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................19 MONITORING HISTORY OF JURISDICTIONS ...............................................................................................................19 City of San Diego ...............................................................................................................................................19 County of San Diego ..........................................................................................................................................22 Other Jurisdictions.............................................................................................................................................23 MONITORING HISTORY OF PARTICIPATING AGENCIES .............................................................................................24 U.S. Geological Survey ......................................................................................................................................24 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ...........................................................................................................................25 California Department of Fish and Game .........................................................................................................25 Other Agencies...................................................................................................................................................26 Non-Profit Organizations...................................................................................................................................26 ASSESSMENT OF THE MONITORING PLAN ’S IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................................26 2 Draft – Assessment of the MSCP Biological Monitoring Plan August 2005 Step 1: Identify the goals and objectives of the regional conservation plan......................................................26 Step 2: Identify scope of monitoring program....................................................................................................27 Step 3: Compile information relevant to monitoring program design ...............................................................27 Step 4: Strategically divide the system and prioritize for monitoring program development............................27 Step 5: Develop simple management-oriented conceptual models ....................................................................27 Step 6: Identify monitoring recommendations and critical uncertainties ..........................................................27 Step 7: Determine strategy for implementing monitoring..................................................................................28 Step 8: Develop data quality assurance, data management, analysis, and reporting strategies .......................28 Step 9: Complete the adaptive management loop by ensuring effective feedback to decision-making..............28 CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................................................................28 CHAPTER 4: REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE RELEVANT TO BIOLOGICAL MONITORING PLANS........................................................................................................................................................................29 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................29 PRIORITIZATION SCHEMES .......................................................................................................................................30 Review of protocols for prioritizing species at risk of extinction.......................................................................30 Discussion ..........................................................................................................................................................33 Discussion ..........................................................................................................................................................34 INDICATORS , SURROGATES AND FOCAL SPECIES .....................................................................................................34 Indicators and Surrogates..................................................................................................................................35 Focal Species .....................................................................................................................................................36 Discussion ..........................................................................................................................................................38 CONCEPTUAL MODELS ............................................................................................................................................38 Discussion ..........................................................................................................................................................39 STATISTICAL ASPECTS OF MONITORING ..................................................................................................................40 Key Statistical Challenges in the Development of a Biological Monitoring Plan..............................................40 Statistical Sampling Theory ...............................................................................................................................40 Monitoring Through Time..................................................................................................................................44 Discussion ..........................................................................................................................................................45 3 Draft – Assessment of the MSCP Biological Monitoring Plan August 2005 CONCLUSIONS .........................................................................................................................................................46 CHAPTER 5: INITIAL RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................47 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................47 INITIAL RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................................................47
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City of Los Angeles
    County of San Diego General Plan CREST / DEHESA / HARBISON CANYON / GRANITE HILLS COMMUNITY PLAN A d o p t e d A u g u s t 3, 2011 CREST/DEHESA/HARBISON CANYON/GRANITE HILLS COMMUNITY PLAN Table of Contents Introduction to the Community Plan ................................................................................ 1 Purpose of the Community Plan............................................................................... 1 Scope of the Community Plan .................................................................................. 1 Content and Organization of the Community Plan ................................................... 2 How to Use the Community Plan ............................................................................. 3 Implementing, Monitoring, and Amending the Community Plan ............................... 3 Community Background .................................................................................................. 4 a. History ............................................................................................................ 4 b. Relationship to Adjoining Communities ......................................................... 4 c. Environmental Setting .................................................................................... 7 d. Existing Land Uses and Community Character ............................................. 8 e. Existing Community Facilities and Infrastructure ......................................... 11 f. Public Safety ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • P\ Aqo WATER RESOURCES of the BARONA, CAPITAN GRANDE
    p\ aqO LIBRARY COPY r1U .77-2g/ WATER RESOURCES OF THE wripm. BARONA, CAPITAN GRANDE, AND SYCUAN INDIAN RESERVATIONS iillt°ail011111 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Iea;astlk,1/4 staiik I00, N"O U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 11-289 \ PREPARED IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS WATER RESOURCES DIVISION REPORTS SECTION lo - 77 ts) 7. yrVit 7 At; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER RESOURCES OF THE BARONA, CAPITAN GRANDE, AND SYCUAN INDIAN RESERVATIONS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By W. R. Moyle, Jr., and R. L. Blazs Open-File Report 77-289 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESTON, VA. MAR 1 9 1991 SR LIBRARY N") Menlo Park, California r--4 O In October 1977 CONTENTS Page Conversion factors IV Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Purpose and scope 3 Acknowledgments 3 Well- and spring-numbering system 4 Barona Indian Reservation 5 Location and general features 5 Hydrology 5 Conclusions 7 Capitan Grande Indian Reservation 7 Location and general features 7 Hydrology 8 Conclusions 9 Sycuan Indian Reservation 10 Location and general features 10 Hydrology 10 Conclusions 12 Selected references 13 Explanation of well-record tables 14 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Plate 1. Map of the Barona Indian Reservation, San Diego County, California, showing location of wells, springs, and surface-water measurement site In pocket 2. Map of the Capitan Grande Indian Reservation, San Diego County, California, showing location of surface-water gaging stations and measurement sites In pocket 3. Map of the Sycuan Indian Reservation, San Diego County, California, showing location of wells and surface-water gaging station In pocket Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sweetwater Dam: Then and Now
    Sweetwater Dam: Then and Now By Richard A. Reynolds August 2, 2008 Sweetwater Dam: Then and Now Sweetwater Dam is a very important element of the water supply to the South Bay communities. It is the key to treatment and distribution of local runoff and imported supplies. This year is the 120lh in its long history in this important role. The dam, as you will see in this paper, has withstood many challenges and trials from storms that brought runoff flows from the watershed to the 100-year storm levels. A major storm in 1895, only seven years after completion of the dam, overtopped the dam by nearly two feet. This was proof of the core strength of the gravity arch configuration to withstand hydraulic forces. Sweetwater Dam, when completed in its initial configuration on April 7, 1888 (Figure 1), represented the latest design concept for masonry dams and, at its original completed height of 90 feet, was the tallest masonry, gravity arch dam in the United States. It was completed just in time to quench the thirst of South Bay residents and to ensure their hopes for land speculation, municipal growth and agricultural success. In his Nobel Prize winning novel, "East of Eden", John Steinbeck was describing people in California (albeit, in the Salinas Valley) and their awareness of water conditions in general when he wrote, "And it never failed that during the dry years the people forgot about the rich years, and during the wet years they lost all memory of the dry years. It was always that way." And so it was here in the South Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Summary for the 2007 and 2008 Pacific Pond Turtle (Actinemys
    Data Summary for the 2007 and 2008 Pacific Pond Turtle (Actinemys marmorata) Surveys Conducted in the County of San Diego; Boulder Oaks, Lusardi Creek and Los Penasquitos Canyon Data Summary Prepared for: County of San Diego U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WESTERN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH CENTER Data Summary for the 2007 and 2008 Pacific Pond Turtle (Actinemys marmorata) Surveys Conducted in the County of San Diego; Boulder Oaks, Lusardi Creek and Los Penasquitos Canyon By: Chris Brown and Robert N. Fisher U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WESTERN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH CENTER Data Summary Prepared for: County of San Diego Jennifer Haines San Diego Field Station USGS Western Ecological Research Center 4165 Spruance Road, Suite 200 San Diego CA, 92101 Sacramento, California 2008 ii U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DIRK KEMPTHORNE, SECRETARY U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Myers, Director The use of firm, trade, or brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U. S. Geological Survey. For additional information, contact: Dr. Steven Schwarzbach, Center Director Western Ecological Research Center 3020 State University Dr. East Modoc Hall, Room 3006 Sacramento, CA 95819 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Data Summary Introduction and Goals....................................................................................................................... 1 Methods...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Action Calendar Agenda
    SWEETWATER AUTHORITY GOVERNING BOARD MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING September 26, 2018 The Governing Board of Sweetwater Authority held a Regular meeting on Wednesday, September 26, 2018, at the Sweetwater Authority Administrative Office, 505 Garrett Avenue, Chula Vista, California. Chair Thomas called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. • Roll Call Directors Present: Josie Calderon-Scott, Steve Castaneda, Ron Morrison, Terry Thomas, and Jess Van Deventer Directors Absent: Jose F. Cerda and Jose Preciado Management, Staff General Manager Tish Berge, Assistant General Manager Jennifer and Others Present: Sabine, Legal Counsel Paula de Sousa Mills, and Board Secretary Janet Gonzalez. Staff members: Water Treatment Superintendent Justin Brazil, Engineering Manager Erick Del Bosque, Program Manager Sue Mosburg, Director of Engineering Ron Mosher, Administrative Assistant Ligia Perez, Director of Distribution Greg Snyder, and Director of Finance Rich Stevenson. Others present: Barbara Anderson, John Coffey of Coffey Engineering, Bruce Coons and Amie Hayes of Save Our Heritage Organisation, Matt Peterson of Peterson & Price. • Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag • Opportunity for Public Comment (Government Code Section 54954.3) There were no comments from the public. • Chair's Presentation Comments from the Public Regarding Agency Staff and Agency Recognition in the Press ACTION CALENDAR AGENDA 1. Items to be Added, Withdrawn, or Reordered on the Agenda There were none. 2. Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of September 12, 2018 Chair Thomas
    [Show full text]
  • Arroyo Toad (Bufo Californicus (=Microscaphus))
    Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus (=microscaphus)) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus) Photo by permission of Will Flaxington U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office Ventura, California August 2009 5-YEAR REVIEW Arroyo Toad (Bufo californicus (=microscaphus)) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed. If we recommend a change in listing status based on the results of the 5-year review, we must propose to do so through a separate rule-making process defined in the Act that includes public review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • January 11, 2021 Subject: Request for Qualifications For
    January 11, 2021 Subject: Request for Qualifications for Engineering Design Services Regarding Improvements to Loveland Reservoir’s Boat Ramp and Anchors for Boat Dock and Log Boom SWA File: (Gen) Loveland and Sweetwater Reservoirs – Boat Ramp Improvements To Whom It May Concern: Sweetwater Authority (Authority) is seeking an engineering consultant to provide engineering design services for improvements to Loveland Reservoir’s existing boat ramp and anchors for boat dock and log boom. The Authority encourages participation by local, small and/or disadvantaged businesses. Persons or entities submitting a proposal in response to this Request for Qualifications (RFQ) are referred to herein as “Consultant”, “Proposer”, “Firm”, or “Responder”. A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Water Transfers from Loveland Reservoir The Authority owns, operates, and manages two surface water reservoirs along the Sweetwater River as key components of its water supply portfolio. Approximately two- thirds of the runoff from the Sweetwater River watershed flows into Loveland Reservoir, located near Alpine, CA, and the remaining one-third flows into Sweetwater Reservoir, located near Spring Valley, CA. Sweetwater Reservoir supplies local surface water to the Authority’s Robert A. Perdue Water Treatment Plant for treatment and distribution to the Authority’s customers. Loveland Reservoir is not connected to the Authority’s distribution system and the only mechanism to transfer water from Loveland Reservoir to Sweetwater Reservoir, so the water is available for treatment, is to open the Bunger valve at the base of Loveland Dam which impounds Loveland Reservoir, to release water into the Sweetwater River channel through the Middle Basin to Sweetwater Reservoir. The reservoirs are separated by approximately 17 miles of Sweetwater River.
    [Show full text]
  • 20160330 2357 216.Pdf
    ii iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... ix Introduction to Studies ...................................................................................................1 Study 1: Release and Radio Telemetry of Head-started Western Pond Turtles at Sycuan Peak Ecological Reserve........................................................................4 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 4 Methods........................................................................................................................ 4 Study Site ................................................................................................................. 4 Head-starting ............................................................................................................ 8 Telemetry ............................................................................................................... 10 Motion and Time Lapse Cameras .......................................................................... 11 Visual Surveys ....................................................................................................... 12 Results ........................................................................................................................ 12 Telemetry ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • November 2013 Newsletter
    SAN BERNARDINO & RIVERSIDE COUNTIES BRANCH LOS ANGELES SECTION, REGION 9 ‐ SINCE 195S 3 This is my last newsletter and it has been a great pleasure to PRESIDENT’S serve as your Branch President. Overall, it was an excellent e year, and I would like to thank the entire Board for their p MESSAGE continuous dedication, and for their help in coordinating the t wide range of events, from technical tours, general meetings, e high school outreach, and happy hours, to our end of the year m golf tournament, at which I hope to see many of you! b Starting next month I will be passing the baton to the Incoming President, Brandon Reyes, who has many exciting e ideas in store for you. Brandon lead the board in a r brainstorming session to plan the upcoming year. I encourage 2 you to let Brandon or any other Board member know how we can better serve you. Your Branch Board is always open to 0 feedback. One improvement the Board is continuing to work 1 on is the Branch website. Our webmaster updated the site 4 layout last month and it can be accessed for activity and event updates: http://www.asce­ sbriv.org/asce_new/index.html. However, the new Board and Committee Chairs will continue to work with the webmaster on finding ways to improve its functionality and effectiveness. N I would also like to quickly point out a change in next year’s Branch Board. Our current Vice E President, John Rogers, was approached by the LA Section and has been nominated to serve on their Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Supply of the United States, 1966-70
    Surface Water Supply of the United States, 1966-70 Part 11. Pacific Slope Basins in California Volume 1. Basins From Tijuana River to Santa Maria River GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2128 Prepared in cooperation with the State of California and with other agencies UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1976 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR THOMAS S. KLEPPE, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. GS 76-608285 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-02773-9 PREFACE This report was prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the State of California and other agencies, by personnel of the Water Resources Division, J. S. Cragwall, Jr., chief hydrologist, G. W. Whetstone, assistant chief for Scientific Publications and Data Management, under the general direction of G. A. Billingsley, chief, Reports Section, and B. A. Anderson, chief, Data Reports Unit. The data were collected and computed under supervision of L. R. Peterson, district chief, Water Resources Division, Menlo Park, Calif. Ill Page Preface. ....................................................................................... Ill List of gaging stations, in downstream order, for which records are published. ................. VI Scope of work. ................................................................................. 1 Cooperation. ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SWEETWATER AUTHORITY Strategic Plan 2012
    Sweetwater Authority STRATEGIC PLAN Reverse osmosis trains at the Richard A. Reynolds Groundwater Desalination Facility SWEETWATER AUTHORITY strategic plan 2012 Governing Board Ron Morrison, Chair Margaret Cook Welsh, Vice Chair W.D. “Bud” Pocklington Jose Preciado Maria Rubalcaba Teresa “Terry” Thomas Jess Van Deventer Management James L. Smyth, General Manager Jennifer H. Sabine, Assistant General Manager Department Heads Scott McClelland, Director of Water Quality Ron Mosher, Director of Engineering Bill Olson, Director of Distribution George Silva, Director of Information Systems Rich Stevenson, Director of Finance Dina Yorba, Director of Administrative Services PREPARED BY Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Inc. “Among the Stones” Photo by Frances Aquino Hilltop High School Second Place Winner 2012 High School Photo Contest SWEETWATER AUTHORITY STRATEGIC PLAN 2012 table of contents I INTRODUCTION 1 II STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS 9 III STRATEGIC ISSUES 11 IV STRATEGIC PLAN FRAMEWORK 15 V GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 21 GOAL #1 Water Quality 22 GOAL #2 System Reliability 25 GOAL #3 Financial Viability 28 GOAL #4 Customer Service 30 GOAL #5 Staff Development 31 GOAL #6 Administrative Effectiveness 33 VI PLAN IMPLEMENTATION, MONITORING AND REPORTING 37 APPENDICES AVAILABLE UNDER SEPARATE COVER THE SWEETWATER RIVER DELIVERS WATER VIA THE 230-SQUARE MILE WATERSHED STRETCHING FROM THE CLEVELAND NATIONAL FOREST IN THE EAST TO THE SAN DIEGO BAY. Release of water from Loveland into Sweetwater Reservoir I. introduction OVERVIEW OF SWEETWATER history. In May 1869, the Kimball Brothers AUTHORITY Water Company began service to 35 local Sweetwater Authority (Authority) provides residents with water drawn from wells and the safe, reliable water service to approximately Sweetwater River, followed by construction 184,000 people across a 32-square mile area of the Sweetwater Dam and Reservoir in in the South Bay region of San Diego County, 1888.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultant Selection Committee Agenda
    CONSULTANT SELECTION COMMITTEE AGENDA DATE: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 TIME: 4:00 p.m. 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL. 2. ITEMS TO BE ADDED, WITHDRAWN, OR REORDERED IN THE AGENDA. 3. PUBLIC COMMENT. Opportunity for members of the public to address the Committee. (Government Code Section 54954.3). 4. ACTION AGENDA. The following items on the Action Agenda call for discussion and action by the Committee. All items are placed on the Agenda so that the Committee may discuss and take action on the item if the Committee is so inclined, including items listed for information. Consultant Selection for the Programmatic Permitting of the Property Operations and Maintenance Plan 5. CLOSED SESSION At any time during the regular session, the Committee may adjourn to closed session to consider litigation, personnel matters, or to discuss with legal counsel matters within the attorney-client privilege. (Government Code Section 54954.5.) 6. NEXT MEETING DATE: To be determined. 7. ADJOURNMENT. This agenda was posted at least seventy-two (72) hours before the meeting in a location freely accessible to the Public on the exterior bulletin board at the main entrance to the Authority’s office and it is also posted on the Authority’s website at www.sweetwater.org. No action may be taken on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, except as provided by California Government Code Section 54954.2. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the members of the Sweetwater Authority Governing Board regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Authority Administration Office, located at 505 Garrett Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910, during normal business hours.
    [Show full text]