DOCSLIB.ORG

Maritsa Highway Cost Benefit Analysis Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maritsa Highway Cost Benefit Analysis Report Transportation May 2012 Gabrovo – Shipka Highway Project Cost Benefit Analysis Main Report Prepared by: .................... Checked by: Edmund Salt Graham Powell Consultant, Transportation Regional Director, Transportation Approved by: Martin Bright Director, Transportation Gabrovo – Shipka Highway Project, EU Cohesion Fund Application, Supporting Document Rev No Comments Checked by Approved Date by 1 Draft Report GCP MJB 13/10/2011 2 Revised Draft Report following comments from JASPERS GCP MJB 10/05/2012 Beaufort House, 94/96 Newhall Street, Birmingham, B3 1PB Telephone: 0121 262 1900 Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No: 60214559 Reference Date Created: May 2012 This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited for the sole use of our client (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM Limited and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM Limited, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM Limited. f:\tp\proposal\bulgaria cba (birmingham)\12 - gabrovo - shipka\reports\cba report\version 2\gabrovo - shipka cba report_120510.doc Table of Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Policy Context of the Scheme .......................................................................................................................................... 2 3 Summary of Feasibility Study and Preferred Option Identification ............................................................................ 15 4 The Transport Models ..................................................................................................................................................... 42 5 Traffic Forecasts ............................................................................................................................................................. 75 6 Project Costs ................................................................................................................................................................. 110 7 Economic Cost Benefit Analysis ................................................................................................................................. 117 8 Financial Cost Benefit Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 133 9 Economic and Financial Cost Benefit Analysis Results ............................................................................................ 135 10 Risk Analysis on the Preferred Options ...................................................................................................................... 140 11 Summary and Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................... 157 Appendices The Appendices to this report are contained in a separate document entitled ‘Gabrovo-Shipka Highway Project, Cost Benefit Analysis, Appendices to Main Report’. AECOM Gabrovo – Shipka Highway Project Cost Benefit Analysis 1 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction This report presents the Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) for the Gabrovo-Shipka Highway Project, which involves the construction of a road bypass west of the town of Gabrovo and a tunnel under Shipka Peak. The report explains the background to the project, and its context within the Gabrovo-Shipka corridor, before describing the relevant scheme details and options, as drawn from the previous Feasibility Study. The report then provides information on the transport model and forecasting, before reporting the results from the Cost Benefit Analysis and identifying the Preferred Options. This report is structured as follows: Chapter 2 describes the objectives of the project and how it meets national and international transport policy objectives, in particular how the project contributes to the pan-European and TEN-T policy framework; Chapter 3 presents the details of the project, describing the scheme variants contained within the existing Feasibility Study and the process by which the Project Options have been assessed; Chapter 4 sets out the traffic forecasting methodology and key assumptions; Chapter 5 includes the traffic forecasts and traffic composition for the project; Chapter 6 provides the background information on the estimation of project costs; Chapters 7 and 8 describe the key inputs and methodology for the Economic and Financial CBA; Chapter 9 presents the results of the Financial and Economic CBA for the preferred option; Chapter 10 discusses the outcomes of sensitivity tests and the methodology and results of the risk analysis for the preferred option; and Chapter 11 contains the summary and conclusions. This report is principally concerned with the CBA for the Gabrovo-Shipka Highway Project, as this is the means through which the Preferred Options are indentified. The report does not include a Multi-Criteria Assessment or a review of environmental issues as these are outside the scope of this task. AECOM Gabrovo – Shipka Highway Project Cost Benefit Analysis 2 2 Policy Context of the Scheme 2.1 Project Objectives The proposed Gabrovo – Shipka Highway Project needs to be viewed within the context of the objectives of the Bulgarian Government and the regulatory framework of the EU. It is important that the scheme sits comfortably with, and satisfies, the appropriate policy drivers at a regional, national and international level to ensure the necessary approvals can be obtained to take the scheme through to implementation. An appreciation of the policy context is necessary to understand the justification for the scheme, in a strategic sense, complimenting the technical and financial assessments undertaken. 2.2 Scheme Location National Context As illustrated in Figure 2.1, Gabrovo is located in central Bulgaria to the northwest of the Central Balkan National Park. The national park itself is situated on the Balkan Mountain Range which spans the entire width of the country. The topography of central Bulgaria causes severance between northern conurbations, such as Gabrovo, and those in the south which results in poor transport connectivity for vehicular travel. Figure 2.1 Location of Gabrovo, Bulgarian National Context AECOM Gabrovo – Shipka Highway Project Cost Benefit Analysis 3 Figure 2.2 Gabrovo to Shipka Corridor As illustrated in Figure 2.2, the town of Shipka lies immediately to the south of the Balkan Mountain Range. For the purposes of this report, the Gabrovo-Shipka corridor is defined as the length of the route between the two conurbations. The First Class Road I-5 is the primary route through the corridor, and an important link between the north and south of the country, however the poor quality and challenging alignment of the road currently results in slow journey times and delays through the corridor. Poor weather conditions also result in the section of the road along the Shipka Pass being closed during the winter months due to heavy goods vehicles becoming stuck (in 2008, a ban on 10 tonne vehicles was introduced on the pass which has had the effect of reducing the frequency of enforced closures). AECOM Gabrovo – Shipka Highway Project Cost Benefit Analysis 4 Major Road Network in Bulgaria The existing major road network in Bulgaria is displayed in Figure 2.3. Figure 2.3 Motorway Network in Bulgaria In 2011, the total length of completed motorway in Bulgaria was 437 km, including the Lyulin Highway (20km) which was completed in 2011. By 2013, it is envisaged that the total motorway network of Bulgaria will be 619 km with the completion of the Maritsa Motorway, Trakia Motorway and Vidin Bridge crossing. The Gabrovo-Shipka corridor is not part of the motorway network; however, it has been identified as a link of interest in terms of expressway projects. Expressway projects contribute to providing major road connections across Bulgaria through improved 1st class roads. In 2011, the total length of 1st class roads in Bulgaria was 2,961 km, of which the 86 km within the Gabrovo municipality made up 3%. Upon completion of the Gabrovo-Shipka bypass and tunnel, the amount of 1st class road network in the region would increase to 117 km. AECOM Gabrovo – Shipka Highway Project Cost Benefit Analysis 5 Figure 2.4 Road Network within the Gabrovo-Shipka Corridor AECOM Gabrovo – Shipka Highway Project Cost Benefit Analysis 6 Figure 2.4 displays the road network within the Gabrovo-Shipka corridor, including the existing route of the I-5 between the two settlements. This illustrates the current role of the I-5 as the only direct connection between Gabrovo and Shipka which, as a result of its challenging alignment and periods of closure of the Shipka Pass, can cause severance along the north-south axis for transit traffic (as well as isolating residents of Shipka from Gabrovo and other conurbations to the north). International Context Bulgaria has a strategic geographical position within Europe, emphasised by the fact that five Pan European Corridors pass through the country: IV, VII, VIII, IX, and X. These Corridors are further described below and are shown on Figure 2.5. Corridor IV: Germany - Turkey:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Neolithic and chalcolithic cultures in Turkish Thrace Erdogu, Burcin How to cite: Erdogu, Burcin (2001) Neolithic and chalcolithic cultures in Turkish Thrace, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3994/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk NEOLITHIC AND CHALCOLITHIC CULTURES IN TURKISH THRACE Burcin Erdogu Thesis Submitted for Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be published without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. University of Durham Department of Archaeology 2001 Burcin Erdogu PhD Thesis NeoHthic and ChalcoHthic Cultures in Turkish Thrace ABSTRACT The subject of this thesis are the NeoHthic and ChalcoHthic cultures in Turkish Thrace. Turkish Thrace acts as a land bridge between the Balkans and Anatolia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria Revealed.Pages
    Licensed under Velvet Tours 1 Spiridon Matei St. 032087 Bucharest, Romania Tour operator license #6617 Bulgaria revealed (10 nights) Tour Description: "Bulgaria Revealed" allows you to experience an extensive array of carefully-chosen Bulgarian cultural landmarks via a comprehensive, yet relaxed itinerary. Begin in Sofia, where you’ll stroll along the famed yellow brick road to view the capital’s major sights. Continue on to Boyana Church and the spectacular Rila Monastery before traveling to Melnik, surrounded by unusual sand formations and situated right in the heart of Bulgarian wine country. Next, tour Rozhen Monastery before stopping off in the exquisite town of Kovacevica. Take in the breathtaking natural scenery at Dospat Lake and Trigrad Gorge, then explore the mysterious Yagodinska Cave. In Batak, visit a key site in the 1876 April Uprising; in the village of Kostandovo, tour the workshop of a master traditional carpet-maker. Experience an evening walking tour in Plovdiv, then admire the abundance of traditional architecture in Koprivshtitsa. At Starosel, investigate the largest Thracian burial complex in Bulgaria. Visit the Thracian Tomb at Kazanlak, drive through the stunning Shipka Pass, and tour the incredible outdoor cultural museum at Etara. Witness the woodcarving tradition at Tryavna, shop for crafts in Veliko Tarnovo, and stroll through the architectural gem of Arbanassi. View the Madara Horseman as well as the exquisite sites at Ivanovo and Sveshtari. See the world’s oldest gold treasure at Varna, with the option to tour Balchik Palace and the Aladzha Cave Monastery—or simply spend the afternoon on the beach. Finally, enjoy a splendid day on the magnificent peninsula of Nessebar before returning to Sofia and your flight home.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Light of the Above, the Commission Does Not Conclude That
    14.11.2002 EN Official Journal of the European Communities C 277 E/183 In the light of the above, the Commission does not conclude that Directive 97/11/EC has not been properly transposed into Spanish law as regards giving the public concerned an opportunity to take part in the procedure. (1) OJ L 175, 5.7.1985. (2) OJ L 73, 14.3.1997. (3) Case C-342/00. (2002/C 277 E/205) WRITTEN QUESTION E-1299/02 by Christopher Heaton-Harris (PPE-DE) to the Commission (7 May 2002) Subject: French farm fraud Further to Commissioner Fischler’s response to written question P-0440/02 (1) by Neil Parish, will the Commission please confirm that it will inform the European Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control as soon as the Commission has read and examined the report in detail? Will the Commission forward its opinion as soon as possible? How does the Commission plan on recovering the missing funds? (1) OJ C 229 E, 26.9.2002. Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission (10 June 2002) The Commission is in the process of examining the report of the French Court of Auditors in detail. It will inform the Parliament’s Committee, on Budgetary Control (Cocobu) about its opinion on the report if invited to do so by the Committee. The results of the examination will be in principle available before the summer break. If there is any evidence of administrative weaknesses leading to a risk to the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) then this will be dealt with by proposing financial corrections through the clearance of accounts process.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Sumary of the Full Environmental Assessment Of
    DANGO PROJECT CONSULT LTD 1618 Sofia, 46, Ljubljana str., phone/fax 02/81-80-602, cell phone 088 8934 772 Е-mail: [email protected]; www.dangoltd.com Full Environmental Assessment of TTFSE II Project, Component II: “Construction of a 3.4 km access road to Kapitan Andreevo Border Crossing Point (BCP), part of Maritsa Motorway” FINAL REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sofia May 2009 Full Environmental Assessment of TTFSE II Project, Component 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY “Construction of 3.4 km access road to Kapitan Andreevo Border Crossing Point), part of Maritsa Motorway” TABLE OF CONTENT Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 1 1. General information............................................................................................................. 2 1.1. Subject and scope of the Project .................................................................................. 2 1.2. Legal and regulatory framework................................................................................. 4 1.3. Institutional arrangements........................................................................................... 4 1.4. Institutions, legal entities and natural persons concerned by the project................ 5 2. Road route alternatives of 3.4 km access road to the Kapitan Andreevo BCP.............. 7 3. Analysis and assessment of the environmental conditions in scenarios ........................ 10 3.1. Existing road І – 8 (Baseline conditions)..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kresna Gorge and Struma Motorway Lot 3.2 (Bulgaria)
    Kresna Gorge and Struma Motorway Lot 3.2 (Bulgaria) Malina Kroumova Representative of the Bulgarian Government 38th Meeting of the Standing Committee of the Bern Convention November 2018 Struma Motorway . The busiest international road going through Bulgaria in the North-South direction . Part of the core TEN-T network, Orient-East/Med corridor . Located in Southwestern Bulgaria (150 km long) . Top priority infrastructure project for the EU . Site of national importance 2 Kresna Gorge - Issues . Serious and frequent accidents along the existing road . Mortality of wild animals on the road, fragmentation of habitats . Travel time, comfort and reliability of road users . Safety of the population and environmental issues in Kresna Town 3 EIA/AA Decision . Five alternatives were equally and thoroughly assessed . Only Long Tunnel Alternative and Eastern Alternative G10.50 were found to be compatible with the conservation objectives of both protected areas . Eastern Alternative G10.50 has clear advantage over 8 environmental components and factors of human health . The Minister of Environment and Water issued EIA Decision No 3-3/2017 approving Eastern Alternative G10.50 . Mandatory conditions and measures for implementation at all stages of the realization of G10.50 4 EIA/AA Decision - Mitigation Measures . Assessed in the EIA/AA . Fencing and passage facilities – technically feasible . Elimination of the risk of mortality and reduction of the barrier effect . Monitoring of the population (4 of the potentially most affected species) 5 Alternatives addressed in the NGOs’ report . Eastern Alternative G20 . Full Tunnel Alternative . Eastern Bypass (the so called “Votan Project”) . Eastern Tunnel Alternative (combination of Lot 3.2 with the existing railway line) 6 Eastern Alternative G20 .
    [Show full text]
  • The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800S-1900S
    The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800s-1900s February 2003 Katrin Bozeva-Abazi Department of History McGill University, Montreal A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Contents 1. Abstract/Resume 3 2. Note on Transliteration and Spelling of Names 6 3. Acknowledgments 7 4. Introduction 8 How "popular" nationalism was created 5. Chapter One 33 Peasants and intellectuals, 1830-1914 6. Chapter Two 78 The invention of the modern Balkan state: Serbia and Bulgaria, 1830-1914 7. Chapter Three 126 The Church and national indoctrination 8. Chapter Four 171 The national army 8. Chapter Five 219 Education and national indoctrination 9. Conclusions 264 10. Bibliography 273 Abstract The nation-state is now the dominant form of sovereign statehood, however, a century and a half ago the political map of Europe comprised only a handful of sovereign states, very few of them nations in the modern sense. Balkan historiography often tends to minimize the complexity of nation-building, either by referring to the national community as to a monolithic and homogenous unit, or simply by neglecting different social groups whose consciousness varied depending on region, gender and generation. Further, Bulgarian and Serbian historiography pay far more attention to the problem of "how" and "why" certain events have happened than to the emergence of national consciousness of the Balkan peoples as a complex and durable process of mental evolution. This dissertation on the concept of nationality in which most Bulgarians and Serbs were educated and socialized examines how the modern idea of nationhood was disseminated among the ordinary people and it presents the complicated process of national indoctrination carried out by various state institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Largest 50 Beneficiaries in Each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds” Prepared at the Request of the CONT Committee
    STUDY Requested by CONT Committee The Largest 50 Beneficiaries in each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds PRE-RELEASE Policy Department for Budgetary Affairs Authors: Willem Pieter DE GROEN, Jorge NUNEZ, Daina BELICKA, Roberto EN MUSMECI, Damir GOJSIC and Silvia TADI Directorate-General for Internal Policies PE 679.107– January 2021 The Largest 50 Beneficiaries in each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds PRE-RELEASE Abstract This report provides the preliminary findings of the study on “The Largest 50 beneficiaries in each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds” prepared at the request of the CONT committee. It provides the results of an assessment of almost 300 systems for the public disclosure of the beneficiaries of the common agricultural policy (CAP) and cohesion policy. Moreover, it provides the preliminary results for the analysis of about 10 million beneficiaries of the CAP in 2018 and 2019 and more than 500 000 projects receiving cohesion funds between 2014 and 2020. Finally, it assesses the barriers to more data transparency and the possibilities to enhance the transparency. NOTE: This is a pre-release version of the study. Changes may occur based on the final results of the research. For internal use only. This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control. It designated Ms Monika Hohlmeier to follow the study. AUTHORS Willem Pieter DE GROEN, CEPS Jorge NUNEZ, CEPS Daina BELICKA, CSE COE Roberto MUSMECI, CEPS Damir GOJSIC, CEPS Silvia TADI, CEPS The authors would like to thank Daniele Genta, Babak Hakimi and Xinyi Li for their valuable contributions to this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Data Sheet
    Luxembourg, 05 February 2013 Environmental and Social Data Sheet Overview Project Name: MARITSA MOTORWAY (FL20060411) Project Number: 20110478 Country: BULGARIA Project Description: Construction of 65.62km new dual carriageway motorway between Plodovitova and Hermanli thus completing the motorway connection between Sofia and the Turkish border on TEN corridors IV and X. EIA required: yes 1 Project included in Carbon Footprint Exercise : no (Details for projects included are provided in section: “EIB Carbon Footprint Exercise”) Summary of Environmental and Social Assessment, including key issues and overall conclusion and recommendation The project is part of the SOP-T which was subject to a strategic environmental assessment following Bulgarian legislation in accordance with SEA Directive 2001/42/EC. The Environmental report was approved in February 21st, 2007. The project falls under the incidence of Annex I of the EIA Directive 2011/92/EC as amended, and therefore subject to an EIA. The assessment process began prior to accession of Bulgaria to EU in the ‘90s with a first positive decision issued on 1994. The assessment was subsequently revised and new positive decisions issued in 2000 and 2007. In 2010 a further assessment was done and a new decision was issued in conformity with local legislation that enacts the relevant European Directives, including in relation with the Natura 2000 network. The project passes in close vicinity of four and crosses three Natura 2000 sites. Following the adoption of specific mitigation measures, the residual impact is expected to be not significant, as confirmed also by the competent authority. Following the application of the mitigation measures, the project will have major residual negative impacts specific to this type of infrastructure project, namely land take, severance and noise.
    [Show full text]
  • BULGARIA DISCOVERED GUIDE on the Cover: Lazarka, 46/55 Oils Cardboard, Nencho D
    Education and Culture DG Lifelong Learning Programme BULGARIA DISCOVERED GUIDE On the cover: Lazarka, 46/55 Oils Cardboard, Nencho D. Bakalski Lazarka, this name is given to little girls, participating in the rituals on “Lazarovden” – a celebration dedicated to nature and life’ s rebirth. The name Lazarisa symbol of health and long life. On the last Saturday before Easter all Lazarki go around the village, enter in every house and sing songs to each family member. There is a different song for the lass, the lad, the girl, the child, the host, the shepherd, the ploughman This tradition can be seen only in Bulgaria. Nencho D. BAKALSKI is a Bulgarian artist, born in September 1963 in Stara Zagora. He works in the field of painting, portraits, iconography, designing and vanguard. He is a member of the Bulgarian Union of Artists, the branch of Stara Zagora. Education and Culture DG Lifelong Learning Programme BULGARIA DISCOVERED GUIDE 2010 Human Resource Development Centre 2 Rachenitsa! The sound of bagpipe filled the air. The crowd stood still in expectation. Posing for a while against each other, the dancers jumped simultaneously. Dabaka moved with dexterity to Christina. She gently ran on her toes passing by him. Both looked at each other from head to toe as if wanting to show their superiority and continued their dance. Christina waved her white hand- kerchief, swayed her white neck like a swan and gently floated in the vortex of sound, created by the merry bagpipe. Her face turned hot… Dabaka was in complete trance. With hands freely crossed on his back he moved like a deer performing wondrous jumps in front of her … Then, shaking his head to let the heavy sweat drops fall from his face, he made a movement as if retreating.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizontal Issues and Legislative Procedures on 3Rd August, a Meeting of the Development Council Was Carried Out
    Implementation of the Structural funds in Bulgaria Monthly brief, August-September 2011 Horizontal issues and legislative procedures On 3rd August, a meeting of the Development Council was carried out. There was a discussion on the priorities of the National Development Programme: Bulgaria 2020 (NDP), which were finally approved. On 20th September a meeting-discussion of the Inter-institutional Working group for the elaboration of the National Development Programme: Bulgaria 2020 was hold. The meeting included a presentation by an expert from the OECD, Mr. Jose Enrique Garcilazo, who presented some analytical findings of the publication Regional Outlook 2011, which provided important information that would be helpful in the process of preparation of the National Development Programme: Bulgaria 2020. On 27th September, a Round Table „From National Goals and Priorities of the National Development Programme: Bulgaria 2020 to Partnership Contract for Development and Investments 2014-2020” was hold in Sofia. A public discussion concerning the elaboration of the National Development Programme: Bulgaria 2020, its strategic goals and priorities, and the main areas of interventions, where the policy’ effects will be most important for the development of the country took place. The main participants of the academic society of the country were invited in the event and expressed their opinion on the process of preparation of the document. Regarding the financial corrections mechanism, a permanent interministerial work group for supporting the managing authorities will be established. The main tasks of the work group will be to discuss different cases where financial corrections will be imposed and to support methodologically the Managing Authorities regarding the process of imposing financial corrections under the OPs.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment in Bulgaria 2018 | 121
    Investment in Bulgaria 2018 | 121 Investment in Bulgaria 2018 KPMG in Bulgaria kpmg.com/bg © 2018 KPMG Bulgaria EOOD, a Bulgarian limited liability company and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved. Investment in Bulgaria Edition 2018 Investment in Bulgaria 2018 | 3 Preface Investment in Bulgaria is one of a series of booklets published by firms within the KPMG network to provide information to those considering investing or doing business internationally. Every care has been taken to ensure that the information presented in this publication is correct and reflects the situation as of April 2018 unless otherwise stated. Its purpose is to provide general guidelines on investment and business in Bulgaria. As the economic situation is undergoing rapid change, further advice should be sought before making any specific decisions. For further information on matters discussed in this publication, please contact Gergana Mantarkova, Managing Partner. KPMG in Bulgaria Sofia Varna 45/A Bulgaria Boulevard 3 Sofia Street, floor 2 1404 Sofia 9000 Varna Bulgaria Bulgaria Tel: +359 2 96 97 300 Tel: +359 52 699 650 Fax: +359 2 96 97 878 Fax: +359 52 611 502 [email protected] kpmg.com/bg © 2018 KPMG Bulgaria EOOD, a Bulgarian limited liability company and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Balkan Fold-Thrust Belt: an Overview of the Main Features
    GEOLOGICA BALCANICA, 42. 1 – 3, Sofia, Dec. 2013, p. 29-47. The Balkan Fold-Thrust Belt: an overview of the main features Dian Vangelov1, Yanko Gerdjikov1, Alexandre Kounov2, Anna Lazarova3 1Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, 15 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria; e-mail: [email protected] 2Geological-Paleontological Institute, Geoscience Department, Basel University; e-mail: [email protected] 3Geological Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev Str., Bl. 24, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria; e-mail: [email protected] (Accepted in revised form: November 2013) Abstract. The Balkan Fold-Thrust Belt is a part of the northern branch of the Alpine-Himalayan orogen in the Balkan Peninsula and represents a Tertiary structure developed along the southern margin of the Moesian Platform. The thrust belt displays of two clearly distinct parts: an eastern one dominated exclusively by thin-skinned thrusting and a western part showing ubiquitous basement involvement. A wide transitional zone is locked between both parts where the structural style is dominantly thin-skinned, but with significant pre-Mesozoic basement involvement in the more internal parts. For the western thick-skinned part the poorly developed syn-orogenic flysch is a characteristic feature that along with the very restricted development of foreland basin suggests a rather limited orogenic shortening compared to the eastern part of the belt. The Tertiary Balkan Fold-Thrust Belt originated mainly through a basement- driven shortening and this is explained by the occurrence of compatibly oriented reactivated basement weak zones of pre-Carboniferous, Jurassic and Early Cretaceous ages. The proposed re-definition of the Balkan thrusts system and internal structure of the allochthons also call for significant re-assessment of the existing schemes of tectonic subdivision.
    [Show full text]