Parliamentary Library Briefing Book Key Issues for the 43Rd Parliament Foreword

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parliamentary Library Briefing Book Key Issues for the 43Rd Parliament Foreword Pa rliament of Australia Department of Pa rliamentary Services INFORMATION ANALYSIS ADVICE PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY BRIEFING BOOK KEY ISSUES FOR THE 43RD PARLIAMENT Foreword This Briefing Book has been written to assist senators and members to prepare for significant issues that are expected to arise in the early months of the 43rd Parliament. It presents a brief introduction to areas of key public policy concern, outlines the context for those concerns and discusses possible new policy and legislative directions. The issues are presented in summary form. Senators and members are encouraged to contact the Parliamentary Library researchers identified against each contribution for further assistance © Copyright 2010 Commonwealth of Australia with confidential oral or written briefing, analysis The federal election of 2010 produced the first or information. In addition, individual senators This work is copyright. Except to the extent of uses permitted by the Copyright hung parliament since 1940. The Gillard Labor and members can request research on any Act 1968, no person may reproduce or transmit any part of this work by any Government retained power by the smallest parliamentary and policy issue by contacting the process without the prior written consent of the Parliamentary Librarian. This possible majority with the support of three Parliamentary Library. Requests can be made requirement does not apply to members of the Parliament of Australia acting in independents and the Australian Greens. To through: the course of their official duties. secure a governing coalition, the Australian Labor Party committed to a series of wide-ranging • the Library’s Central Enquiry Point (extension This work has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament parliamentary reforms with the Australian Greens 2500), or using information available at the time of production. The views expressed do and the Coalition including new procedures for • the contacts in the Parliamentary Library’s not reflect an official position of the Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute Question Time in the House of Representatives, online Guide to Services at http://library. professional legal opinion. enhancing the authority of the Speaker, strengthening the role of committees, increasing The Briefing Book is available in hard copy to Feedback is welcome and may be provided to: [email protected]. Any the prominence of private members’ business and senators and members. It is also available online concerns or complaints should be directed to the Parliamentary Librarian. establishing a Parliamentary Budget Office and through the Senators’ and Members’ Services Parliamentary Integrity Commissioner. Portal, the Parliamentary Library’s intranet and the Parliamentary Library staff are available to discuss the contents of publications Parliament’s web site. For copyright reasons, some with senators and members and their staff. To access this service, clients may Key challenges before this unique parliament will of the linked sources in the electronic version of contact the author or the Library’s Central Entry Point (02) 6277 2500 for referral. include implementing those reforms, making them the document may not be accessible through the work and dealing with their likely consequences, Internet. Published by the Parliamentary Library, Department of Parliamentary Services, while continuing to address important national Parliament House, Canberra. legislative and policy issues. Such issues include I am confident that the Briefing Book will be a climate change, population pressures, regional valuable resource for all senators and members. Production: Publishing Section, Parliamentary Library. development, economic prosperity, reforming I and all my staff look forward to supporting the social services and meeting environmental and work of the 43rd Parliament throughout its term. Printed by Canprint Communications Pty Ltd, energy needs. At this stage it appears that the 16 Nyrang Street, Fyshwick ACT 2609 proposed procedures will enable backbenchers Roxanne Missingham and committees to play a greater role in shaping Parliamentary Librarian Coordinators and editors: Richard Webb and Mark Rodrigues. the agenda of the parliament. This might mean that an even greater variety of issues will be brought 16 September 2010 Cover image: Ben Warren. before the new parliament. Page | i Contents Parliament and public administration reform 2010 Federal election 2 Composition of the 43rd Parliament 4 Hung parliament 6 Parliamentary reform 8 Enabling the franchise 10 Australian Public Service reform 12 Reforming social services and institutions School reform 14 Meeting the need for higher level skills through tertiary education reform 16 A health care system for the 21st century 18 Improving the health of all Australians: the role of preventative health 20 Funding support for people with disability 22 The challenge of housing the nation 24 Addressing social disadvantage Tackling ‘corrosive’ welfare 26 Welfare to work: a reform agenda in progress 28 Indigenous affairs: shared goals, elusive outcomes 30 Population and infrastructure Australia’s future population 32 Population growth: what role does immigration play? 34 Challenges of an ageing population 36 Building sustainable cities 38 Regional population trends in Australia 40 Population and the natural environment 42 Broadband telecommunications 44 Parliamentary Library Briefing Book: Key Issues for the 43rd Parliament Page | iii Environment and energy Parliamentary Library Briefing Book: The politics and science of climate change 46 rd Emissions control policies 48 Key issues for the 43 Parliament Renewable energy targets 50 Powering Australia from renewable sources 52 Climate change action: a multi-faceted approach 54 Strengthening the Environment Protection Biodiversity and Conservation Act 56 Murray-Darling Basin water issues 58 Marine oil pollution 60 Tasmanian forests: future agreement? 62 International whaling 64 The minerals sector 66 Law, justice and human rights Public sector accountability and transparency 68 Indigenous people, local government and other constitutional issues 70 Same-sex marriage 72 Parliament and the protection of human rights 74 ‘Property’ and acquisition on just terms 76 Plain packaging of tobacco products 78 The nation’s economy Domestic economy overview 80 Australia, China and the Global Financial Crisis 82 Australia’s future tax system 84 International comparisons of national debt 86 Emissions taxes 88 Australia in the world Australia’s regional engagements in East Asia and the Asia Pacific 90 Australian Defence Force in Afghanistan 92 The Defence Strategic Reform Program (SRP) 94 Refugees: Australia’s humanitarian response 96 The Iranian nuclear program 98 Australia’s engagement with the United Nations 100 Free Trade Agreement negotiations with North Asia 102 Copenhagen: a stepping stone 104 Parliamentary Library Briefing Book: Key Issues for the 43rd Parliament Page | 1 The result The three ‘country independents’ (and former 2010 Federal Election Nationals) worked together in their dealings Opinion polls throughout the campaign revealed with the parties but came to their own separate Rob Lundie, Politics and Public Administration Section that a hung parliament was a real possibility, and decisions as to who they would support. Bob so it turned out to be. Labor won 72 seats, the Katter (independent, Kennedy, Qld) chose Coalition 73, the Greens one and there were four to support the Coalition while Tony Windsor independents. (independent, New England, NSW) and Rob Oakeshott (independent, Lyne, NSW) went with The 2010 Federal Election was held on Saturday important state where Labor’s proposed mining There was a swing against Labor of 2.6 per cent the ALP. So, the Gillard Government was granted 21 August and resulted in a hung parliament – tax was a significant issue. but it won the two party preferred vote 50.1 a second term, securing the smallest possible the first federally since 1940. The election was per cent to the Coalition’s 49.9 per cent. The majority of 76 to 74 to pass the Budget and survive called by Prime Minister Julia Gillard on 17 July. Gillard began her campaign revealing that she was seats won by the parties and the change from no confidence motions. The independents and She had successfully challenged Kevin Rudd ‘moving forward’ although she was often forced the 2007 election are shown in the table below. the Greens member reserved the right to vote for the leadership of the Australian Labor Party to look back when answering questions about her These figures are based on votes counted to 15 differently on other matters. (ALP) on 24 June following a marked decline in ‘removal’ of Kevin Rudd. Disquiet over the way he September and could change. support for the ALP in the polls. Her opponent was removed, even amongst those who supported Voter turnout nationally was 93.2 per cent down was Liberal Party leader Tony Abbott who had Gillard, and particularly amongst Queensland Both major parties began negotiations with the 1.5 per cent from the last election. The informal defeated Malcolm Turnbull for the leadership on voters in Rudd’s home state, threatened to Greens and independent members in an attempt vote nationally was 5.55 per cent in the House of 1 December 2009. The House was dissolved and interfere with her desire to portray a new beginning to gain their support in the House to form stable Representatives, an increase of 1.6 per cent. In the Senate prorogued on 19 July when the writs for Labor. government: in effect ensuring they would have the Senate, the informal vote was 3.75 per cent, an were also issued. the numbers to pass supply and to defeat any no increase of 1.2 per cent. Her campaign also received a setback when it was confidence motions. In return for their support, The 14 088 260 people enrolled to vote included leaked that she had questioned pension increases the major parties responded to lists of demands Senate 57 732 who were added to the roll following the and aspects of a parental leave scheme when they which, among other things, sought a greater High Court’s decision on 6 August to extend were discussed in Cabinet.
Recommended publications
  • Journal Is: (2009) 7 NZJPIL (Page)
    © New Zealand Centre for Public Law and contributors Faculty of Law Victoria University of Wellington PO Box 600 Wellington New Zealand June 2009 The mode of citation of this journal is: (2009) 7 NZJPIL (page) The previous issue of this journal is volume 6 number 2, December 2008 ISSN 1176­3930 Printed by Geon, Brebner Print, Palmerston North Cover photo: Robert Cross, VUW ITS Image Services CONTENTS SPECIAL CONFERENCE ISSUE: MMP AND THE CONSTITUTION Foreword Dean R Knight...........................................................................................................................vii "Who's the Boss?": Executive–Legislature Relations in New Zealand under MMP Ryan Malone............................................................................................................................... 1 The Legal Status of Political Parties under MMP Andrew Geddis.......................................................................................................................... 21 Experiments in Executive Government under MMP in New Zealand: Contrasting Approaches to Multi­Party Governance Jonathan Boston and David Bullock........................................................................................... 39 MMP, Minority Governments and Parliamentary Opposition André Kaiser............................................................................................................................. 77 Public Attitudes towards MMP and Coalition Government Raymond Miller and Jack Vowles..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion, Homosexuality and the Slippery Slope: Legislating ‘Moral’ Behaviour in South Australia
    Abortion, Homosexuality and the Slippery Slope: Legislating ‘Moral’ Behaviour in South Australia Clare Parker BMusSt, BA(Hons) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Discipline of History, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Adelaide. August 2013 ii Contents Contents ii Abstract iv Declaration vi Acknowledgements vii List of Abbreviations ix List of Figures x A Note on Terms xi Introduction 1 Chapter 1: ‘The Practice of Sound Morality’ 21 Policing Abortion and Homosexuality 24 Public Conversation 36 The Wowser State 44 Chapter 2: A Path to Abortion Law Reform 56 The 1930s: Doctors, Court Cases and Activism 57 World War II 65 The Effects of Thalidomide 70 Reform in Britain: A Seven Month Catalyst for South Australia 79 Chapter 3: The Abortion Debates 87 The Medical Profession 90 The Churches 94 Activism 102 Public Opinion and the Media 112 The Parliamentary Debates 118 Voting Patterns 129 iii Chapter 4: A Path to Homosexual Law Reform 139 Professional Publications and Prohibited Literature 140 Homosexual Visibility in Australia 150 The Death of Dr Duncan 160 Chapter 5: The Homosexuality Debates 166 Activism 167 The Churches and the Medical Profession 179 The Media and Public Opinion 185 The Parliamentary Debates 190 1973 to 1975 206 Conclusion 211 Moral Law Reform and the Public Interest 211 Progressive Reform in South Australia 220 The Slippery Slope 230 Bibliography 232 iv Abstract This thesis examines the circumstances that permitted South Australia’s pioneering legalisation of abortion and male homosexual acts in 1969 and 1972. It asks how and why, at that time in South Australian history, the state’s parliament was willing and able to relax controls over behaviours that were traditionally considered immoral.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Overview
    ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL OVERVIEW PHOTO: PAUL LOVELACE PHOTOGRAPHY Professor Ken Wiltshire AO Professor Ken Wiltshire is the JD Story Professor of Public Administration at the University of Queensland Business School. He is a Political long-time contributor to CEDA’s research and an honorary trustee. overview As Australia enters an election year in 2007, Ken Wiltshire examines the prospects for a long-established Coalition and an Opposition that has again rolled the leadership dice. 18 australian chief executive RETROSPECT 2006 Prime Minister and Costello as Treasurer. Opinion Politically, 2006 was a very curious and topsy-turvy polls and backbencher sentiment at the time vindi- … [Howard] became year. There was a phase where the driving forces cated his judgement. more pragmatic appeared to be the price of bananas and the depre- From this moment the Australian political than usual … dations of the orange-bellied parrot, and for a dynamic changed perceptibly. Howard had effec- nation that has never experienced a civil war there tively started the election campaign, and in the “ were plenty of domestic skirmishes, including same breath had put himself on notice that he culture, literacy, and history wars. By the end of the would have to win the election. Almost immedi- year both the government and the Opposition had ately he became even more pragmatic than usual, ” changed their policy stances on a wide range of and more flexible in policy considerations, espe- issues. cially in relation to issues that could divide his own Coalition. The defining moment For Kim Beazley and the ALP, Howard’s decision The defining moment in Australian politics was clearly not what they had wanted, despite their occurred on 31 July 2006 when Prime Minister claims to the contrary, but at least they now knew John Howard, in response to yet another effort to the lay of the battleground and could design appro- revive a transition of leadership to his Deputy Peter priate tactics.
    [Show full text]
  • 04 Chapters 8-Bibliography Burns
    159 CHAPTER 8 THE BRISBANE LINE CONTROVERSY Near the end of March 1943 nineteen members of the UAP demanded Billy Hughes call a party meeting. Hughes had maintained his hold over the party membership by the expedient of refusing to call members 1a together. For months he had then been able to avoid any leadership challenge. Hughes at last conceded to party pressure, and on 25 March, faced a leadership spill, which he believed was inspired by Menzies. 16 He retained the leadership by twenty-four votes to fifteen. The failure to elect a younger and more aggressive leader - Menzies - resulted in early April in the formation by the dissenters of the National Service Group, which was a splinter organisation, not a separate party. Menzies, and Senators Leckie and Spicer from Victoria, Cameron, Duncan, Price, Shcey and Senators McLeary, McBride, the McLachlans, Uphill and Wilson from South Australia, Beck and Senator Sampson from Tasmania, Harrison from New South Wales and Senator Collett from Western Australia comprised the group. Spender stood aloof. 1 This disturbed Ward. As a potential leader of the UAP Menzies was likely to be more of an electoral threat to the ALP, than Hughes, well past his prime, and in the eyes of the public a spent political force. Still, he was content to wait for the appropriate moment to discredit his old foe, confident he had the ammunition in his Brisbane Line claims. The Brisbane Line Controversy Ward managed to verify that a plan existed which had intended to abandon all of Australia north of a line north of Brisbane and following a diagonal course to a point north of Adelaide to be abandoned to the enemy, - the Maryborough Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriage Equality and the Civil Union
    Maddalena Arnfield http://www.flickr.com/photos/lasandri/5932352747 http://www.flickr.com/photos/doxiehaus/3568405719/ Marriage Equality and the Civil Union ‘solution’ ‘ Any ‘alternative’ to marriage, in my opinion, simply offers the insult of formal equivalency without the promise of substantive equality.’ Harry Laforme, Former Justice of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice1 Court of Conscience | 35 ocial media is humming with campaigns for marriage equality. Social Justice SCampaigners such as Get Up, and minority parties including the Socialist Alliance have leant their support, while lobby groups such as Australian Marriage Equality have been established to fight for change. Parliament is debating the pros and cons of various Marriage Amendment bills and the Federal Labor government have recently changed their party policy to endorse gay marriage. Support for removal of discrimination against same-sex couples is gaining momentum. Some are even predicting that the privileged space which homophobia currently occupies will soon be nothing more than a shameful part of our history, akin to life before the women’s liberation or civil rights movements of the sec- http://www.flickr.com/photos/monopache/7439352654/ ond half of the twentieth century. –––––––– A global movement … New Zealand This is not a local initiative; the marriage equality movement is global. In 2001, the Netherlands is set to have a made history as the first nation in the world to recognise gay marriage. Belgium followed in conscience vote 2003. Against all odds, in 2005, the pre- dominantly Catholic Spain legalised same-sex before the year marriage and a few short weeks later Canada is through with enacted the Civil Marriage Act2 providing a gender neutral definition of marriage.
    [Show full text]
  • ACA Qld 2019 National Conference
    ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ • • • • • • • • • • • • • Equal Remuneration Order (and Work Value Case) • 4 yearly review of Modern Awards • Family friendly working conditions (ACA Qld significant involvement) • Casual clauses added to Modern Awards • Minimum wage increase – 3.5% • Employment walk offs, strikes • ACA is pursuing two substantive claims, • To provide employers with greater flexibility to change rosters other than with 7 days notice. • To allow ordinary hours to be worked before 6.00am or after 6.30pm. • • • • • Electorate Sitting Member Opposition Capricornia Michelle Landry [email protected] Russell Robertson Russell.Robertson@quee nslandlabor.org Forde Bert Van Manen [email protected] Des Hardman Des.Hardman@queenslan dlabor.org Petrie Luke Howarth [email protected] Corinne Mulholland Corinne.Mulholland@que enslandlabor.org Dickson Peter Dutton [email protected] Ali France Ali.France@queenslandla bor.org Dawson George Christensen [email protected] Belinda Hassan Belinda.Hassan@queensl .au andlabor.org Bonner Ross Vasta [email protected] Jo Briskey Jo.Briskey@queenslandla bor.org Leichhardt Warren Entsch [email protected] Elida Faith Elida.Faith@queenslandla bor.org Brisbane Trevor Evans [email protected] Paul Newbury paul.newbury@queenslan dlabor.org Bowman Andrew Laming [email protected] Tom Baster tom.Baster@queenslandla bor.org Wide Bay Llew O’Brien [email protected] Ryan Jane Prentice [email protected] Peter Cossar peter.cossar@queensland
    [Show full text]
  • Faith, Conscience and Legislation
    FAITH, CONSCIENCE AND LEGISLATION DR DARRYN JENSEN* I INTRODUCTION Conscience votes are, depending upon whom one talks to, either an example of our democratic processes at their best or a blight on our liberal democratic polity. Former Prime Minister of New Zealand, David Lange, held the latter point of view. Lange described the outcome of conscience votes as ‘a shambles, a kind of legislative lottery in which consistency is the first casualty’.1 One can understand why politicians in Westminster democracies, being concerned first and foremost with their ability to implement their party platforms when in office, would take this attitude. One can also understand why some in the wider community, believing that they voted for a candidate on the basis of that candidate’s identification with a particular party platform, object to conscience votes on the basis that a legislator is free to bring religious and other personal convictions to bear upon the matter before Parliament. While these objections are understandable, they reveal a number of potentially controversial assumptions about the nature of Anglo-Australian parliamentary democracy. The objections assume that members of Parliament are elected to represent the concrete will of those who voted for them, so as to implement a particular basket of measures. Furthermore, the understanding of a conscience vote as a rare exception to the general principle that legislators should follow the ‘party line’ assumes that the program of government is largely fixed by the results of elections and that parliamentary procedures are merely a formality in the implementation of the government’s election promises.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of the Australian Greens
    Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library Information, analysis and advice for the Parliament RESEARCH PAPER www.aph.gov.au/library 22 September 2008, no. 8, 2008–09, ISSN 1834-9854 The rise of the Australian Greens Scott Bennett Politics and Public Administration Section Executive summary The first Australian candidates to contest an election on a clearly-espoused environmental policy were members of the United Tasmania Group in the 1972 Tasmanian election. Concerns for the environment saw the emergence in the 1980s of a number of environmental groups, some contested elections, with successes in Western Australia and Tasmania. An important development was the emergence in the next decade of the Australian Greens as a unified political force, with Franklin Dam activist and Tasmanian MP, Bob Brown, as its nationally-recognised leader. The 2004 and 2007 Commonwealth elections have resulted in five Australian Green Senators in the 42nd Parliament, the best return to date. This paper discusses the electoral support that Australian Greens candidates have developed, including: • the emergence of environmental politics is placed in its historical context • the rise of voter support for environmental candidates • an analysis of Australian Greens voters—who they are, where they live and the motivations they have for casting their votes for this party • an analysis of the difficulties such a party has in winning lower house seats in Australia, which is especially related to the use of Preferential Voting for most elections • the strategic problems that the Australian Greens—and any ‘third force’—have in the Australian political setting • the decline of the Australian Democrats that has aided the Australian Greens upsurge and • the question whether the Australian Greens will ever be more than an important ‘third force’ in Australian politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Independents in Australian Parliaments
    The Age of Independence? Independents in Australian Parliaments Mark Rodrigues and Scott Brenton* Abstract Over the past 30 years, independent candidates have improved their share of the vote in Australian elections. The number of independents elected to sit in Australian parliaments is still small, but it is growing. In 2004 Brian Costar and Jennifer Curtin examined the rise of independents and noted that independents ‘hold an allure for an increasing number of electors disenchanted with the ageing party system’ (p. 8). This paper provides an overview of the current representation of independents in Australia’s parliaments taking into account the most recent election results. The second part of the paper examines trends and makes observations concerning the influence of former party affiliations to the success of independents, the representa- tion of independents in rural and regional areas, and the extent to which independ- ents, rather than minor parties, are threats to the major parities. There have been 14 Australian elections at the federal, state and territory level since Costar and Curtain observed the allure of independents. But do independents still hold such an allure? Introduction The year 2009 marks the centenary of the two-party system of parliamentary democracy in Australia. It was in May 1909 that the Protectionist and Anti-Socialist parties joined forces to create the Commonwealth Liberal Party and form a united opposition against the Australian Labor Party (ALP) Government at the federal level.1 Most states had seen the creation of Liberal and Labor parties by 1910. Following the 1910 federal election the number of parties represented in the House * Dr Mark Rodrigues (Senior Researcher) and Dr Scott Brenton (2009 Australian Parliamentary Fellow), Politics and Public Administration Section, Australian Parliamentary Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Here Our Heart Jiggled with Joy: Celebrating One Year Since Historic Nuclear Dump Decision 38 Material Has Been Reprinted from Another Source
    Issue #124 | September 2015 RRP $5.50 The National Magazine of Friends of the Earth Australia www.foe.org.au ABBOTT GOVERNMENT ATTACKING THE ENVIRONMENT MOVEMENT #friendoffoe • Australia needs politically active environmental groups • The Trans Pacific Partnership • Australian pesticides map takes shape • Occupied Palestine: The soldiers in the night • Semantically engineered crops • Growing renewable energy in Victoria Edition #124 − September 2015 REGULAR ITEMS Publisher - Friends of the Earth, Australia Chain Reaction ABN 81600610421 Join Friends of the Earth 4 FoE Australia ABN 18110769501 FoE Australia News 5 www.foe.org.au FoE Australia Contacts inside back cover youtube.com/user/FriendsOfTheEarthAUS CONTENTS twitter.com/FoEAustralia facebook.com/pages/Friends-of-the-Earth- Australia/16744315982 flickr.com/photos/foeaustralia GOVERNMENT ATTACKS ON ENVIRONMENTAL GROUPS Threats against environment groups, threats against democracy 10 Chain Reaction website – Ben Courtice www.foe.org.au/chain-reaction Australia needs politically active environmental groups – Susan Laurance and Bill Laurance 11 Silence on the agenda for enviro-charity inquiry – Andrew Leigh 13 Chain Reaction contact details PO Box 222,Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065. email: [email protected] phone: (03) 9419 8700 ARTICLES Chain Reaction team Australian pesticides map takes shape – Anthony Amis 15 Jim Green, Tessa Sellar, Franklin Bruinstroop, Some reflections on Friends of the Earth: 1974−76– Neil Barrett 16 Michaela Stubbs, Claire Nettle River Country Campaign – Morgana
    [Show full text]
  • List of Senators
    The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia House of Representatives List of Members 46th Parliament Volume 19.1 – 20 September 2021 No. Name Electorate & Party Electorate office details & email address Parliament House State/Territory telephone & fax 1. Albanese, The Hon Anthony Norman Grayndler, ALP Email: [email protected] Tel: (02) 6277 4022 Leader of the Opposition NSW 334A Marrickville Road, Fax: (02) 6277 8562 Marrickville NSW 2204 (PO Box 5100, Marrickville NSW 2204) Tel: (02) 9564 3588, Fax: (02) 9564 1734 2. Alexander, Mr John Gilbert OAM Bennelong, LP Email: [email protected] Tel: (02) 6277 4804 NSW 32 Beecroft Road, Epping NSW 2121 Fax: (02) 6277 8581 (PO Box 872, Epping NSW 2121) Tel: (02) 9869 4288, Fax: (02) 9869 4833 3. Allen, Dr Katrina Jane (Katie) Higgins, LP Email: [email protected] Tel: (02) 6277 4100 VIC 1/1343 Malvern Road, Malvern VIC 3144 Fax: (02) 6277 8408 Tel: (03) 9822 4422 4. Aly, Dr Anne Cowan, ALP Email: [email protected] Tel: (02) 6277 4876 WA Shop 3, Kingsway Shopping Centre, Fax: (02) 6277 8526 168 Wanneroo Road, Madeley WA 6065 (PO Box 219, Kingsway WA 6065) Tel: (08) 9409 4517 5. Andrews, The Hon Karen Lesley McPherson, LNP Email: [email protected] Tel: (02) 6277 7860 Minister for Home Affairs QLD Ground Floor The Point 47 Watts Drive, Varsity Lakes QLD 4227 (PO Box 409, Varsity Lakes QLD 4227) Tel: (07) 5580 9111, Fax: (07) 5580 9700 6. Andrews, The Hon Kevin James Menzies, LP Email: [email protected] Tel: (02) 6277 4023 VIC 1st Floor 651-653 Doncaster Road, Fax: (02) 6277 4074 Doncaster VIC 3108 (PO Box 124, Doncaster VIC 3108) Tel: (03) 9848 9900, Fax: (03) 9848 2741 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Marginal Seat Analysis – 2019 Federal Election
    Australian Landscape Architects Vote 2019 Marginal Seat Analysis – 2019 Federal Election Prepared by Daniel Bennett, Fellow, AILA The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) classifies seats based on the percentage margin won on a ‘two candidate preferred’ basis, which creates a calculation for the swing to change hands. Further, the AEC classify seats based on the following terms: • Marginal (less than 6% swing or 56% of the vote) • Fairly safe (between 6-10% swing or 56-60% of the vote) • Safe (more than 10% swing required and more than 60% of the vote) As an ardent follower of all elections, I offer the following analysis to assist AILA in preparing pre- election materials and perhaps where to focus efforts. As the current Government is a Coalition of the Liberal and National Party, my focus is on the fairly reliable (yet not completely correct) assumption that they have the most to lose and will find it hard to retain the treasury benches. Polls consistently show the Coalition on track to lose from 8 up to 24 seats, which is in plain terms a landslide to the ALP. However polls are just that and have been wrong so many times. So lets focus on what we know. The Marginals. According to the latest analysis by the AEC and the ABC’s Antony Green, the Coalition has 22 marginal seats, there are now 8 cross bench seats, of which 3 are marginal and the ALP have 24 marginal seats. This is a total of 49 marginal seats – a third of all seats! With a new parliament of 151 seats, a new government requires 76 seats to win a majority.
    [Show full text]