DOCSLIB.ORG

California Urban Crime Declined in 2020 Amid Social and Economic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California Urban Crime Declined in 2020 Amid Social and Economic CALIFORNIA URBAN CRIME DECLINED IN 2020 AMID SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC UPHEAVAL Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice Mike Males, Ph.D., Senior Research Fellow Maureen Washburn, Policy Analyst June 2021 Research Report Introduction In 2020, a year defined by the COVID-19 pandemic, the crime rate in California’s 72 largest cities declined by an average of 7 percent, falling to a historic low level (FBI, 2021). From 2019 to 2020, 48 cities showed declines in Part I violent and property felonies, while 24 showed increases. The 2020 urban crime decline follows a decade of generally falling property and violent crime rates. These declines coincided with monumental criminal justice reforms that have lessened penalties for low-level offenses and reduced prison and jail populations (see Figure 1). Though urban crime declined overall in 2020, some specific crime types increased while others fell. As in much of the country, California’s urban areas experienced a significant increase in homicide (+34 percent). They also saw a rise in aggravated assault (+10 percent) and motor vehicle theft (+10 percent) along with declines in robbery (-15 percent) and theft (-16 percent). Preliminary 2021 data point to a continued decline in overall crime, with increases continuing in homicide, assault, and motor vehicle theft. An examination of national crime data, local economic indicators, local COVID-19 infection rates, and select murder and domestic violence statistics suggests that the pandemic likely influenced crime. Figure 1. California urban crime rates*, 2010 through 2020 3,500 3,000 -14% 2,500 -16% 2,000 Public Safety Proposition 47 Proposition 57 1,500 Realignment 1,000 500 -3% 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Part I Violent Property Sources: FBI (2021); DOF (2021). *Total and violent offense rates exclude rape because the definition was broadened in 2014, hindering comparisons across this period. The unusually wide variation across crime types seen in 2020 suggests that the pandemic may have exerted both upward and downward pressures on the crime landscape. For example, COVID-19 lockdowns, which kept millions home, may have reduced the opportunity for robberies and thefts. Conversely, people experienced substantial psychological and economic strain during the pandemic, which may have contributed to increased homicides and assaults, as well as business failures and related cases of arson. If COVID-19 has indeed played a role in driving some crimes higher and others lower, recent crime rate changes may be short lived. Importantly, the pandemic also forced community-based service providers and social service agencies to dramatically shift the way they deliver treatment, aid, and supportive services. Many providers that previously focused on violence prevention, trauma recovery, or drug treatment were unable to offer in-person services. The Page 1 of 12 sudden and devastating economic crisis demanded that some turn their attention to meeting basic needs, such as food distribution. This profound disruption of services undoubtedly affected communities’ wellness and, by extension, their level of safety. 2020 Crime Trends • Crime rates fell by 14 percent from 2010 to 2020, including a 7 percent drop in 2020. Even before the pandemic, California was enjoying a period of record-low crime. From 20101 to 2020, crime rates in California’s largest cities fell by 14 percent overall, including a 3 percent decrease in violent crime and a 16 percent decline in property crime (Table 1). From 2019 to 2020, homicide, assault, and motor vehicle theft rose substantially, while robbery and larceny/theft fell substantially. During the same period, burglary rates remained stable, overall property crime fell 9 percent, and violent crime rates rose 1 percent. However, crime rates and trends varied widely from city to city in 2020 (see Appendix). Table 1. California urban crime rates* per 100,000 population, 2010-2020 Larceny Vehicle Year Total* Violent* Homicide Robbery Assault Property Burglary /theft theft 2010 3,286.9 482.6 5.7 209.9 267 2,804.3 605.6 1,719.2 479.5 2011 3,196.1 454.1 5.7 196.8 251.6 2,742.0 598.6 1,684.8 458.6 2012 3,448.2 462.6 6.3 201.9 254.5 2,985.6 640.9 1,818.2 526.6 2013 3,306.8 430.0 5.5 191.8 232.8 2,876.7 598.6 1,773.9 504.3 2014 3,094.6 423.2 5.0 169.8 248.4 2,671.4 528.9 1,684.6 457.9 2015 3,302.9 458.6 5.5 180.7 272.4 2,844.3 508.3 1,841.2 494.8 2016 3,225.8 479.2 5.8 184.3 289.1 2,746.6 471.6 1,760.9 514.1 2017 3,225.0 484.5 5.4 189.4 289.6 2,740.5 447.4 1,805.7 487.4 2018 3,102.5 473.7 5.0 181.4 287.4 2,628.8 423.6 1,754.1 451.2 2019 3,049.8 465.2 4.9 172.5 287.9 2,584.5 387.4 1,743.2 454.0 2020 2,827.8 469.2 6.5 146.3 316.3 2,358.7 387.1 1,472.7 498.9 2020 vs. 2010 -14% -3% +15% -30% +18% -16% -36% -14% +4% 2020 vs. 2019 -7% +1% +34% -15% +10% -9% +0% -16% +10% Sources: FBI (2021); DOF (2021). *Total and violent offense rates exclude rape because the definition was broadened in 2014, hindering comparisons across this period. Notably, from 2019 to 2020, rape rates declined by 10 percent. • 80 percent of California’s cities showed declines in crime from 2010 through 2020. Most communities were safer in 2020 than at the start of the decade, despite claims that reform would erode public safety. Of the 71 cities reporting consistent crime figures to the FBI, 58 showed decreases in Part I offenses2 from 2010 through 2020, and 13 showed increases. The variation that exists across California’s cities indicates that recent crime trends reflect local practices and conditions far more than state policies (CJCJ, 2016; 2017; 2018; 2019; 2020). • Large-scale criminal justice reforms are not driving increased crime. California’s “justice reform era” began in 2011 with legislative passage of Public Safety Realignment, which transferred responsibility for individuals with nonviolent, non-sexual, and non-serious convictions from state prisons to local custody and supervision (AB 109, 2011). In 2014, California voters passed Proposition 47, which reclassified several drug and property offenses from felonies to misdemeanors, resulting in the release and resentencing of thousands of individuals (Prop 47, 2014). In 2016, Proposition 57 offered early parole opportunities for people in state prison who participated in rehabilitative and education programs (Prop 57, 1 2010 was the last full year before Public Safety Realignment (AB 109) took effect, marking the start of California’s decade- long criminal justice reform era. 2 Part I offenses include the following violent and property crimes: homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny/theft, motor vehicle theft, and arson. Page 2 of 12 2016). The state decriminalized marijuana in 2011 and legalized it with regulations in 2016, reducing marijuana arrests by 93 percent between 2010 and 2019 (DOJ, 2020; Prop 64, 2016; SB 1449, 2010). The uneven crime changes seen in 2020 suggest abnormal conditions that year. Moreover, the types of crimes that increased in 2020 are not the ones directly affected by California’s recent criminal justice reforms and are unlikely to reflect the lagging effects of law changes implemented four to 10 years earlier. Modest increases in violent crime reflect trends in felony assault, whose fluctuations tend to be driven by domestic violence incidents and policing (Holder et al., 2009). Local surges in motor vehicle thefts may be associated with more sophisticated theft operations given the changing age profile of those arrested (NCSL, 2008).3 Meanwhile, the offenses whose rates fell in 2020 (larceny/theft) or remained the same (burglary) are those directly targeted by reform efforts. Another indicator of the unique nature of 2020’s crime trends is shown by a relatively rare offense, arson. While arson had remained stable from 2010 through 2016, it has risen since, registering a 46 percent increase in 2020 (7,179 arsons, compared to 5,023 in 2019). Arson is not a crime associated with the reform of drug or property offense laws. • Early 2021 crime data show inconsistent trends across seven major cities. Seven major cities provide figures for varying periods of 2021 compared to the same periods of 2020 (Table 2). The comparison periods in early 2020 partly preceded the pandemic lockdowns. As is always the case with California jurisdictions, trends are erratic and inconsistent. Five of the seven cities show increased homicide, six show increased violent crimes (four of the seven show increases in rape, one shows increased robbery, and all seven show increases in felony assault), and four of the seven show increased property crimes (three show increased burglaries, all seven show increased motor vehicle thefts, and one shows an increase in other thefts). Table 2. Changes in reported crimes, seven major cities, 2021 vs. 2020 City Total Part I Homicide All violent All property Time period Long Beach +10% -9% +15% +9% Jan 1 - April 30 Los Angeles -6% +24% +5% -9% Jan 1 - May 29 Oakland -17% +135% +13% -23% Jan 1 - May 31 Sacramento +2% +50% +20% -1% Jan 1 - March 31 San Diego +14% -10% +19% +13% Jan 1 - May 31 San Francisco -9% 0% -88% -9% Jan 1 - May 31 San Jose +5% +75% +17% +2% Jan 1 - April 30 All seven cities -3% +33% +9% -9% 932 city-days Sources: LAPD (2021); LBPD (2021); OPD (2021); SPD (2021); SDPD (2021); SFPD (2021); SJPD (2021).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1996 Annual Report
    Los Angeles Police Department Annual Report 1996 Mission Statement 1996 Mission Statement of the Los Angeles Police Department Our mission is to work in partnership with all of the diverse residential and business communities of the City, wherever people live, work, or visit, to enhance public safety and to reduce the fear and incidence of crime. By working jointly with the people of Los Angeles, the members of the Los Angeles Police Department and other public agencies, we act as leaders to protect and serve our community. To accomplish these goals our commitment is to serve everyone in Los Angeles with respect and dignity. Our mandate is to do so with honor and integrity. Los Angeles Mayor and City Council 1996 Richard J. Riordan, Mayor Los Angeles City Council Back Row (left to right): Nate Holden, 10th District; Rudy Svorinich, 15th District; Rita Walters, 9th District; Richard Alarcón, 7th District; Laura Chick, 3rd District; Hal Bernson, 12th District; Michael Feuer, 5th District; Mark Ridley-Thomas, 8th District; Jackie Goldberg, 13th District; Richard Alatorre, 14th District Front Row (left to right): Ruth Galanter, 6th District; Joel Wachs, 2nd District; John Ferraro, President, 4th District; Mike Hernandez, 1st District; Marvin Braude, President Pro-Tempore, 11th District Board of Police Commissioners 1996 Raymond C. Fisher, President Art Mattox, Vice-President Herbert F. Boeckmann II, Commissioner T. Warren Jackson, Commissioner Edith R. Perez, Commissioner Chief's Message 1996 As I review the past year, the most significant finding is that for the fourth straight year crime in the City of Los Angeles is down.
    [Show full text]
  • Gangs Beyond Borders
    Gangs Beyond Borders California and the Fight Against Transnational Organized Crime March 2014 Kamala D. Harris California Attorney General Gangs Beyond Borders California and the Fight Against Transnational Organized Crime March 2014 Kamala D. Harris California Attorney General Message from the Attorney General California is a leader for international commerce. In close proximity to Latin America and Canada, we are a state laced with large ports and a vast interstate system. California is also leading the way in economic development and job creation. And the Golden State is home to the digital and innovation economies reshaping how the world does business. But these same features that benefit California also make the state a coveted place of operation for transnational criminal organizations. As an international hub, more narcotics, weapons and humans are trafficked in and out of California than any other state. The size and strength of California’s economy make our businesses, financial institutions and communities lucrative targets for transnational criminal activity. Finally, transnational criminal organizations are relying increasingly on cybercrime as a source of funds – which means they are frequently targeting, and illicitly using, the digital tools and content developed in our state. The term “transnational organized crime” refers to a range of criminal activity perpetrated by groups whose origins often lie outside of the United States but whose operations cross international borders. Whether it is a drug cartel originating from Mexico or a cybercrime group out of Eastern Europe, the operations of transnational criminal organizations threaten the safety, health and economic wellbeing of all Americans, and particularly Californians.
    [Show full text]
  • Crimes and Initiatives 2015
    ‘15 vs ‘05 Total Part I Crime ‘15 vs ‘14 ‘15 vs ‘05 Rape ‘15 vs ‘14 Homicide 120,000 Rape 116,532 1,800 103,492 1,649 489 480 100,000 1,600 500 2000 1,512 1,400 395 80,000 384 1649 1,200 1,105 400 1512 1,059 60,000 1,004 1,000 312 1500 949 293 297 299 903 923 936 828 283 40,000 260 764 800 251 300 11051059 1004 600 949 903 923 936 20,000 1000 828 764 400 200 - 200 - 100 500 2014 2015 92,096 92,096 0 0 2005 2006 2007 2008CITYWIDE2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 TOTAL2015 PART2005 2006 2007 2008 I2009 CRIMES2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 *Rape Stats prior to 2014 were updated to include additional Crime Class Codes YEAR to DATE THROUGH 12/31/2015 that have been added to the UCR Guidelines for the crime of Rape. ‘15 vs ‘05 ‘15 vs ‘14 ‘15 vs ‘05 ‘15 vs ‘14 Homicide Robbery ‘15 vs ‘05AggravatedRape AssaultsRobbery ‘15 vs ‘14 Homicide ‘15 vs ‘05 ‘15 vs ‘14 489 16,000 Rape 489 480 500 480 2000 500 Aggravated Assaults 2000 14,353 14,353 15000 13,797 20000 18,000 13,797 1649 14,000 13,481395 13,422 13,481 13,422 384 395 1512 16,376 1649 384 12,217 16,000 12,217 16,376 12,000 400 400 14,634 1512 10,924 12000 14,634 14,000 312 10,924 10,077 1500 13,569 1500 293 297 299 312 13,569 10,000 15000 12,926 10,077 8,983 8,935 11,798 283 1105 12,926 293 297 299 12,000 260 1059 7,885 7,940 283 11,798 8,000 1105 10,638 89,83 251 8,935 300 1004 949 260 300 1059 10,615 903 923 936 251 1004 10,000 7,885 7,940 9000 10,638 828 10,615 949 9,344 903 8,843 923 936 764 6,000 1000 8,329 1000 9,344 8,843 10000 828 8,000 8,329 7,624 764 200 7,624 4,000 200 6000 6,000 2,000 500 4,000 500 100 5000 100 3000 - 2,000 - 0 0 0 0 92,096 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 201392,0962014 2015 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 20140 2015 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2005200520062006200720072008200820092009201020102011201120122012201320132014201420152015 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 *Rape Stats prior to 2014 were updated to include additional Crime Class Codes that have been added to the UCR Guidelines for the crime of Rape.
    [Show full text]
  • One Beverly Hills Approved by Council
    BEVERLYPRESS.COM INSIDE • Beverly Hills approves budget Sunny, with pg. 3 highs in the • Fire on Melrose 70s pg. 4 Volume 31 No. 23 Serving the Beverly Hills, West Hollywood, Hanock Park and Wilshire Communities June 10, 2021 WeHo calls for LASD audit One Beverly Hills approved by council n If county fails to act, city may step in n Bosse clashes with BY CAMERON KISZLA Association to audit the contracts of Mirisch on affordable all cities partnered with the LASD, housing issue The West Hollywood City which include West Hollywood. Council took action in regards to The council’s vote, which was BY CAMERON KISZLA the allegations of fraud made part of the consent calendar, comes against the Los Angeles County after the LASD was accused in a The Beverly Hills City Council Sheriff’s Department. legal filing last month of fraudu- on June 8 gave the One Beverly The council on June 7 unani- lently billing Compton, another city Hills project the necessary mously called for the Los Angeles that is contracted with the depart- approvals, but not without some County Board of Supervisors and ment, for patrolling the city less conflict between council members. the inspector general to work with See page The 4-1 vote was opposed by the California Contract Cities LASD 31 Councilman John Mirisch, who raised several issues with the pro- ject, including that more should be done to create affordable housing. rendering © DBOX for Alagem Capital Group The One Beverly Hills project includes 4.5 acres of publicly accessible Mirisch cited several pieces of evidence, including the recently botanical gardens and a 3.5-acre private garden for residents and completed nexus study from hotel guests.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Audit of San Diego Police Department's Data Analysis
    PERFORMANCE AUDIT OF THE SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT’S DATA ANALYSIS SDPD Can Improve Operational Data Analysis and Procedures for Accepting Citizen Complaints Office of the City Auditor City of San Diego September 2020 Report Highlights Performance Audit of SDPD’s Data Analysis SDPD Can Improve Operational Data Analysis and Procedures for Accepting Citizen Complaints Why OCA Did This Study The San Diego Police Department’s (SDPD) mission is to maintain public safety by providing the highest quality police services to all of the City’s communities. SDPD is the largest General Fund department, accounting for a third of both funds and employees. However, SDPD also has a low officer-to-resident ratio compared to other major city police departments. Therefore, complete and accurate data collection, analysis, and reporting are essential to monitoring SDPD’s activities and ensuring SDPD delivers the most efficient, effective, and equitable services possible to promote the well-being of the community. What OCA Found Finding 1: We found that SDPD has policies and procedures, What OCA Recommends system controls, supervisory review, and outside agency review to SDPD largely follows best practices regarding crime help ensure reported crime and Racial and Identity Profiling Act reporting, crime data analysis, and procedures for filing (RIPA) data is complete, reliable, and secure. However, we found complaints against officers. We identified a few ways that there may be some minor variations in the completeness of the SDPD could further improve its policies and procedures to data reported by officers. ensure that it is maximizing the quality of its data, use of that data for evidence-based decision making, and ensuring Finding 2: We found that SDPD can better use its existing data to all potential complaints against officers are accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Ada Update on Service Animal Rules
    2017 ADA UPDATE ON SERVICE ANIMAL RULES The California Hotel & Lodging Association receives many questions regarding the rights and obligations of lodging establishments with respect to service animals. This document contains CHLA’s updated discussion of this topic. First, there has been a significant change regarding California law related to service animals. This change, which is discussed below, will make it easier for lodging operators to deal with guests who claim that their pets are service animals. Here are the basics of California law as it relates to service animals: • There was a time when the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, which administers California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (Act), took the position that the Act applied to the lodging industry. At that time, there was concern that lodging operators would have to comply with the more stringent requirements of the Act: (1) it is not limited to dogs— depending on the circumstances, the FEHA protects other types of animals and treats them as service animals; and (2) it provides protections for people who use “comfort” and “companion” animals. Contrary to the Department’s earlier position, however, CHLA was recently advised that the Act only applies to homes, condos, and apartments, and that it does not apply to hotels! • It is important for lodging operators to bear in mind that although the 2011 revisions to the ADA rules regarding service animals expressly state that (1) only dogs qualify as service animals,1 and that (2) “comfort” and “companion” dogs are not service animals,2 if a local jurisdiction in California has broader, more stringent rules than the ADA, the local rules must be complied with.
    [Show full text]
  • California Crime Rise, the W
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 47 | Issue 6 Article 13 1957 California Crime Rise, The W. H. Parker Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation W. H. Parker, California Crime Rise, The, 47 J. Crim. L. Criminology & Police Sci. 721 (1956-1957) This Criminology is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. THE CALIFORNIA CRIME RISE W. H. PARKER The author was appointed Chief of Police for the City of Los Angeles in August, 1950, and during his term in office has continued to rise in prominence both for his outstanding administration and progressive police policies and for his active partici- pation in various organizations interested in law enforcement throughout the country. Chief Parker has risen through the ranks in the Los Angeles Police Department and is a member of the California State Bar. During World War II he served in the Military Government Branch of the armed forces. His present paper is based upon an address given at the 36th Annual Conference of the Peace Officers Association of the State of California in May, 1956.-EDITOR. During the first nine months of 1956 major crime increased in the City of Los Angeles more than 35 % over the same period last year.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Effects of Video Surveillance on Crime in Los Angeles
    Measuring the Effects of Video Surveillance on Crime in Los Angeles Prepared for the California Research Bureau CRB-08-007 May 5, 2008 Aundreia Cameron Elke Kolodinski Heather May Nicholas Williams CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................4 THE RISE OF CCTV SURVEILLANCE IN CALIFORNIA...................................................6 The Prevalence of Video Surveillance in California ...........................................................7 California Crime Rates, Video Surveillance and Spending.................................................8 Privacy, Efficacy and Public Opinion................................................................................10 Arguments against CCTV on Privacy Grounds…………………………………. 10 Arguments for CCTV on Efficacy Grounds…………………………………….. 11 Privacy versus Efficacy in California…………………………………………... 13 META-ANALYSIS OF EXISTING EMPIRICAL WORK ....................................................14 Crime Deterrence...............................................................................................................14 Crime Detection, Mitigation and Prosecution ...................................................................17 Local Characteristics of CCTV Implementation ...............................................................18 CCTV, CRIME AND POLICING IN LOS ANGELES...........................................................18 Crime and Policing in Los Angeles ...................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • California's 2019 Urban Crime Rate Falls to Record Low Amid Large-Scale
    CALIFORNIA’S 2019 URBAN CRIME RATE FALLS TO RECORD LOW AMID LARGE-SCALE JUSTICE REFORM Mike Males, Ph.D., Senior Research Fellow Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice May 2020 Fact Sheet In the first six months of 2019, violent and property crime rates reached record low levels in 69 California cities1 with populations of 100,000 or more (a combined population of over 15 million), falling 10.4 percent compared to the first half of 2010 (FBI, 2020; DOF, 2020; DOJ, 2020).2 During this ten-year period, the state implemented several large-scale criminal justice reforms, including reduced penalties for certain low-level offenses and expanded parole opportunities for those in state prison (AB 109, 2011; Prop 47, 2014; Prop 57, 2016). • California’s urban crime rate reached a record low in early 2019, falling slightly from early 2018 levels. Compared to the first six months of 2018, January through June 2019 saw modest declines in California’s urban violent crime rate (down 2.6 percent) and property crime rate (down 0.8 percent). During this period, California cities reported decreases in all forms of crime except homicide and larceny-theft, with the largest declines in the motor vehicle theft rate (down 9.1 percent) and burglary rate (down 5.5 percent). • The crime rate declined by 10.4 percent from the first half of 2010 to the first half of 2019. California’s urban crime rate declined rapidly through the 1990s and much of the 2000s (see Appendix A). In recent years, these declines have slowed and rates now hover at historically low levels.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Report on the Status of Women and Girls in Kern County
    1 2015 Report on the Status of Women and Girls in Kern County Commissioned by: Kern Community Foundation, Women’s and Girls’ Fund United Way of Kern County, Women’s Leadership Council Prepared by: Mount Saint Mary’s University, Los Angeles Table of Contents Report Highlights 4 Demographics 5 Employment and Earnings 18 Education 31 Poverty 45 Health 61 Veterans 78 Safety 97 Leadership 114 About the Authors 124 Acknowledgments 125 2 Report on the Status of Women and Girls in Kern County: An Introduction The 2015 Report on the Status of Women and Girls in Kern County offers a look at how Kern’s females are faring in key areas vital to their well being. This report is a compilation of current research on issues and trends that impact the lives of the nearly 425,000 women and girls who live within the County. Our intent is to provide a snapshot of where women are succeeding, where opportunities are most evident, and where obstacles are preventing women from fully contributing to Kern County’s economic, social and cultural growth. This report offers benchmarks that can be used by local leaders to measure future progress in quality-of-life issues throughout the County. The findings from this report are certainly most relevant to Kern County’s female population. Yet it’s important to keep in mind that this research also illustrates how a better quality of life for Kern’s women and girls means a better quality of life for everyone. When all contribute to the success of a community — and when opportunities are available to all — communities prosper.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.14 Public Services Fire Protection and Emergency
    West Adams New Community Plan 4.14 Public Services Draft EIR 4.14 PUBLIC SERVICES This section provides an overview of public services and evaluates the impacts associated with the proposed project. Topics addressed include fire protection and emergency services, police protection services, public schools, and parks and other public services. The proposed project is evaluated in terms of the adequacy of existing and planned facilities and personnel to meet any additional demand generated by the implementation of the West Adams New Community Plan. FIRE PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY SERVICES REGULATORY FRAMEWORK Federal There are no federal fire protection and emergency services regulations applicable to the proposed project. State There are no State fire protection and emergency services regulations applicable to the proposed project. Local City of Los Angeles General Plan, Framework and Safety Elements. The City of Los Angeles General Plan provides policies related to growth and development by providing a comprehensive long-range view of the City as a whole. The General Plan provides a comprehensive strategy for accommodating long-term growth. Goals and policies that apply to all development within the City of Los Angeles include a balanced distribution of land uses, adequate housing for all income levels, and economic stability. The Citywide General Plan Framework (Framework), an element of the City of Los Angeles General Plan adopted in December 1996 and amended in August 2001, is intended to guide the City’s long-range growth and development through the year 2010. The Framework includes goals, objectives, and policies that are applicable to fire protection and emergency services (Table 4.14-1).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6: Other Safety Issues
    TECHNICAL BACKGROUND REPORT to the 2003 SAFETY ELEMENT CITY of GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA CHAPTER 6: OTHER SAFETY ISSUES 6.1 Introduction This chapter covers safety issues that did not fit the theme of the previous chapters, but that nevertheless require discussion. These are also safety issues that the State does not require to be covered in Safety Elements, but that the City of Glendale considers of sufficient importance as to be included in its Safety Element. Specifically, issues covered herein include terrorism and civil unrest, crime, major accident response, dangerous plants and animals, and disease and vector control. The data used in this study are based entirely on openly published information. No confidential information was sought or obtained, nor was any used. 6.2 Terrorism and Civil Unrest 6.2.1 Definitions Webster’s dictionary defines terrorism as the “use of force or threats to demoralize, intimidate, and subjugate, especially as a political weapon or policy.” Terrorists rely on stealth and surprise to accomplish their means and to cause a feeling of uncertainty and hopelessness. The targets chosen are typically high-profile places that are likely to attract the most public attention, usually as a result of media coverage. This assures that the terrorist group’s cause or objective becomes known. This is also why terrorist groups often issue public announcements taking responsibility for their actions. In an effort to cause as much damage as possible, terrorists may use or threaten to use nuclear, biological or chemical substances. These are referred to as Weapons of Mass Destruction, or WMDs. While a terrorist attack is typically meant to generate as much publicity as possible, the planning and delivery phases of the attack need to be conducted in secrecy.
    [Show full text]