DOCSLIB.ORG

The British Bombing of Germany in WW2 Development of Tactics and Technologies from Both Sides

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The British Bombing of Germany in WW2 Development of Tactics and Technologies from Both Sides Manus från föredraget i historiegruppen av Keevin Siegel 20161122 The British bombing of Germany in WW2 development of tactics and technologies from both sides Background o Theory bomber predominance . Gurenica . Italy Ethopia . Bomber get trough theory . Cheap way winning war . Disrupt moral . Impact on Flygvapnet British early war experience o ½ shot down o Pushed off the continent o Circuses, limited to fighter range o Only way to fight back o Night bombing only possibility Freya Freya was first successfully used on December 18, 1939 when two stations detected an approaching daytime raid on Wilhelmshaven by 22 RAF Vickers Wellingtonbombers at a range of 113 km and guided fighter planes toward them via radio.[1]Only half of the Wellingtons returned to Britain undamaged, but the German fighters only reached the bomber after they had made their bombing run on ships in harbor. The performance of Freya left the Luftwaffe so impressed that by the Spring of 1940, eleven Freya stations were installed to guard Germany's western border After the Battle of Britain, RAF Bomber Command began night attacks against German cities. Although Bomber Command had reported good results from the raids, the Butt Report of 18 August 1941 showed only one bomb in ten hit the target, half the bombs fell on open country and in some cases the bombing was seen to fall as far as 50 kilometres (31 mi) from the target. which demonstrated only 5% of the bombs sent out on a mission landed within 5 mi (8.0 km) of their target. With these sorts of statistics, any sort of strategic campaign based on attacks against factories and similar targets was hopeless. This led to Frederick Lindemann's notorious "dehousing" paper, which called for the bomber efforts to be used against the houses of the German citizens in order to break their ability to work and will to resist. This became official policy of the RAF in 1942. Kammhuber Line The first version of the Line consisted of a series of radar stations with overlapping coverage, layered three deep from Denmark to the middle of France, each covering a zone about 32 km long (north-south) and 20 km wide (east-west). The Kammhuber Line consisted of three layers of zones of about 32 km long (north–south) and 20 km wide (east–west). In each zone there were two German night fighter aircraft receiving ground-directed guidance from their own Himmelbettcontroller within each zone. While the Himmelbett control center could only handle two fighters, this was adequate for dealing with the RAF Bomber Command tactic of sending its night time bombers individually, with each bomber plotting its own route to the target, to avoid flak concentrations. Each control centre was known as a Himmelbett (canopy bed) zone, consisting of a Freya radar with a range of about 100 km, a "master searchlight" directed by the radar, and a number of manually directed searchlights spread through the cell. Each cell was also assigned one primary and one backup night fighter. Later versions of the Himmelbett added two Würzburg radars, with a range of about 30 km. Unlike the early-warning Freya, Würzburgs were accurate (and complex) tracking radars. One was locked onto the night fighter as soon as it entered the cell and as soon as the Freya picked up a target the second Würzburg locked onto it. All position reports were sent to the Himmelbett control centre thereby allowing controllers in the Himmelbett centre to get continual readings of the positions of both planes. Freya devices turned out to be vulnerable to chaff, along with other countermeasures, which meant they could still be used for early warning but no longer for guiding fighter planes. British bombing raids could also be organized such that the Kammhuber Line could be overwhelmed in massed raids. 30/31 May 1942 when the first 1,000 bomber raidattacked Cologne, losing only four aircraft to German night fighters. To counter Freya, the British used equipment called 'Moonshine'. Carried by Boulton Paul Defiant aircraft of the Special Duties Flight (later No. 515 Squadron RAF), a single set retransmitted a portion of the Freya signal amplifying the apparent return. Eight planes with 'Moonshine' could mimic a force of 100 bombers.[3] A second countermeasures system, "Mandrel" was a noise jammer carried by aircraft of No. 100 Group RAF which overwhelmed the signals from Freya. Individual aircraft were sent to orbit fixed positions 50 miles (80 km) off the enemy coast. By using nine airplanes, a 200-mile (320 km) gap could be knocked into the German's radar coverage, while further jammers were carried in the bomber stream to counter the inlandFreya network.[4] Bomber Stream A typical bomber stream of 600 to 700 aircraft was on average 8 or 10 miles broad, and 4,000 to 6,000 feet deep. The earlier RAF tactic of sending bombers on individual routes meant that it could take four hours before all its planes would have passed over their target; the bomber stream reduced this window to 90 minutes first use of the bomber stream was the first 1,000 bomber raid against Cologne on the night of 30–31 May 1942. Luftwaffe Nightfighters Lichtenstein radar It was available in at least four major revisions, designated o FuG 202 Lichtenstein B/C, o FuG 212 Lichtenstein C-1, o FuG 220 Lichtenstein SN-2 o the very rarely used FuG 228 Lichtenstein SN-3. o (FuG is short for Funk-Gerät, German "radio set"). Matratze aerial Hirschgeweih (stag's antlers) antennas FuG 202 Lichtenstein B/C It was not until 1942 that the Germans first started deploying the initial B/C low UHF-band version of the Lichtenstein radar, and at that time in extremely limited numbers, using a Matratze (mattress) antenna array, consisting of thirty-two dipole elements, mounted in four groups of eight, each at the forward end of one of four forward-projecting masts.. A race developed with the Germans attempting to introduce new sets and the British attempting to jam them, with the British holding the upper hand throughout. FuG 212 Lichtenstein C-1 During 1943 the Lichtenstein B/C was improved as the FuG 212 Lichtenstein C-1, with longer range and wider angle of view, still operating at UHF Frequencies between 420 and 480 MHz and still using the complex Matratze aerial set. By this point in the war, the British had become experts on jamming German radars. The Luftwaffe flightcrew of a B/C-equippedJu 88 R-1 night fighter, Werknummer 360 043, defected in April 1943 and landed in Scotland, presenting a working example of the German radar for the first time, with the aircraft itself, still in existence as of the 21st century, currently a museum exhibit in the UK. The subsequent refinement of 'Window' (known as Düppel by the Luftwaffe, from the Berlin suburb it was first found near) rendered Lichtenstein B/C almost useless for several crucial weeks. FuG 220 Lichtenstein SN-2 o The low VHF-band SN-2 unit that replaced the C-1 remained relatively secure until July 1944, but only at the cost of using huge, eight-dipole element Hirschgeweih (stag's antlers) antennas that slowed their fighters as much as 25 mph, making them easy prey for British night fighters who had turned to the offensive role. The capture in July 1944 of a Ju 88G-1 night fighter of NJG 2 equipped with an SN-2 Lichtenstein set, flown by mistake into RAF Woodbridge, revealed the secrets of the later, longer-wavelength replacement for the earlier B/C and C-1 sets.[21] Serrate radar detector Serrate was an Allied radar detection and homing device, used in Allied nightfighters to track German night fightersequipped with the earlier UHF- band BC and C-1 versions of the Lichtenstein radar commenced operations over Germany in support of the Bomber Offensive from 14 June to 7 September 1943 The technique developed was for the RAF nightfighters to fly slowly off the bomber stream, mimicking the characteristics of a heavy bomber, until the rearward- facing Serrate(Monica) detector picked up the emissions from a Luftwaffe night fighter approaching. Schräge Musik Schräge Musik (or Schrägwaffen, as it was also called) was first used operationally during Operation Hydra (the first instance of the Allied bombing of Peenemünde) on the night of 17/18 August 1943. Adoption of Schräge Musik began in late 1943 and by 1944, a third of all German night fighters carried upward-firing guns. Wilde Sau Wilde Sau (German for wild boar) was the term given by the Luftwaffe to the tactic used from 1943 to 1944 during World War II by which British night bombers were engaged by single-seat day-fighter aircraft flying in the Defence of the Reich. It was adopted when the Allies had the advantage over German radar controlled interception. The fighters had to engage the British bombers freely as they were illuminated by searchlight batteries while also avoiding their own anti-aircraft fire. After some initial successes, rising losses and deteriorating weather conditions led to the abandonment of the tactic. o On the night of 3/4 July 1943, 653 Bomber Command aircraft attacked Cologne and the Wilde Sau squadrons took part in the defense of the city. The Luftwaffe shot down thirty British aircraft, of which twelve were shot down by Wilde Sau units British capture of a Junkers Ju 88 R-1 night fighter (Werknummer 360043) when its crew defected and flew to Scotland.[3] The aircraft carried the initial B/C form of the UHF- band Lichtenstein radar, so its existence was revealed to the Allies; subsequently, RAF Bomber Command began to use a new form of "Window" (or chaff): aluminium strips sized to jam the Lichtenstein B/C radar when dropped.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE RADAR WAR Forward
    THE RADAR WAR by Gerhard Hepcke Translated into English by Hannah Liebmann Forward The backbone of any military operation is the Army. However for an international war, a Navy is essential for the security of the sea and for the resupply of land operations. Both services can only be successful if the Air Force has control over the skies in the areas in which they operate. In the WWI the Air Force had a minor role. Telecommunications was developed during this time and in a few cases it played a decisive role. In WWII radar was able to find and locate the enemy and navigation systems existed that allowed aircraft to operate over friendly and enemy territory without visual aids over long range. This development took place at a breath taking speed from the Ultra High Frequency, UHF to the centimeter wave length. The decisive advantage and superiority for the Air Force or the Navy depended on who had the better radar and UHF technology. 0.0 Aviation Radio and Radar Technology Before World War II From the very beginning radar technology was of great importance for aviation. In spite of this fact, the radar equipment of airplanes before World War II was rather modest compared with the progress achieved during the war. 1.0 Long-Wave to Short-Wave Radiotelegraphy In the beginning, when communication took place only via telegraphy, long- and short-wave transmitting and receiving radios were used. 2.0 VHF Radiotelephony Later VHF radios were added, which made communication without trained radio operators possible. 3.0 On-Board Direction Finding A loop antenna served as a navigational aid for airplanes.
    [Show full text]
  • CHRIST CHURCH LIBRARY NEWSLETTER Volume 7, Issue 3 Trinity 2011
    CHRIST CHURCH LIBRARY NEWSLETTER Volume 7, Issue 3 Trinity 2011 ISSN 1756-6797 (Print), ISSN 1756-6800 (Online) The Aeschylus of Richard Porson CATALOGUING ‘Z’ - EARLY PRINTED PAMPHLETS Among the treasures of the library of Christ Church is It is often asserted that an individual is that which an edition of the seven preserved plays of they eat. Whether or not this is true in a literal sense, Aeschylus, the earliest of the great Athenian writers the diet to which one adheres has certain, of tragedy. This folio volume, published in Glasgow, predictable effects on one’s physiology. As a result, 1795, by the Foulis (‘fowls’) Press, a distinguished the food we consume can affect our day to day life in publisher of classical and other works, contains the respect to our energy levels, our size, our Greek text of the plays, presented in the most demeanour, and our overall health. And, also as a uncompromising manner. I propose first to describe result, this affects how we address the world, it this extraordinary volume and then to look at its affects our outlook on life and how we interact with place in the history of classical scholarship. The book others. This is all circling back around so that I can contains a title page in classical Greek, an ancient ask the question: are we also that which we read? To life of Aeschylus in Greek, and ‘hypotheses’ or an extent, a person in their early years likely does summaries of the plays, some in Greek and some in not have the monetary or intellectual freedom to Latin.
    [Show full text]
  • Nightfighter Scenario Book
    NIGHTFIGHTER 1 NIGHTFIGHTER Air Warfare in the Night Skies of World War Two SCENARIO BOOK Design by Lee Brimmicombe-Wood © 2011 GMT Games, LLC P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308, USA www.GMTGames.com © GMTGMT Games 1109 LLC, 2011 2 NIGHTFIGHTER CONTENTS SCENARIO 1: Cat’S EYE How to use this book 2 Background. September 1940. Early nightfighting relied on single-seat day fighters cruising the skies in the hope that they SCENARIO 1: Cat’S EYE 2 might find the enemy. Pilots needed “cat’s eyes” to pick out Scenario 1 Variant 2 bombers in the dark. In practice the technique resulted in SCENARIO 2: DUNAJA 3 few kills and more defending aircraft were lost due to night- flying accidents than enemy aircraft were shot down. Scenario 2 Variants 3 This scenario depicts a typical “cat’s eye” patrol during the SCENARIO 3: THE KAMMHUBER LINE 4 German Blitz on Britain. A lone Hurricane fighter is flying Scenario 3 Variants 4 over southern England on a moonlit night. SCENARIO 4: HIMMELBETT 5 Difficulty Level. Impossible. Game Length. The game ends when all bombers have exited Scenario 4 Variants 5 the map, or a bomber is shot down. SCENARIO 5: WILDE SAU 7 Sequence of Play. Ignore the Flak Phase, Radar Search Phase, Scenario 5 Variants 7 AI Search Phase and Searchlight Phase. SCENARIO 6: ZAHME SAU 8 Attacker Forces. (German) Scenario 6 Variants 8 Elements of KG 100, Luftwaffe. The attacker has three He111H bombers. SCENARIO 7: Serrate 11 Attacker Entry. One bomber enters on Turn 1, another on Scenario 7 Variants 11 Turn 5 and a final one on Turn 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Airmen Lost in Wwii by Date 1943
    CANADA'S AIR WAR 1945 updated 21/04/08 January 1945 424 Sqn. and 433 Sqn. begin to re-equip with Lancaster B.I & B.III aircraft (RCAF Sqns.). 443 Sqn. begins to re-equip with Spitfire XIV and XIVe aircraft (RCAF Sqns.). Helicopter Training School established in England on Sikorsky Hoverfly I helicopters. One of these aircraft is transferred to the RCAF. An additional 16 PLUTO fuel pipelines are laid under the English Channel to points in France (Oxford). Japanese airstrip at Sandakan, Borneo, is put out of action by Allied bombing. Built with forced labour by some 3,600 Indonesian civilians and 2,400 Australian and British PoWs captured at Singapore (of which only some 1,900 were still alive at this time). It is decided to abandon the airfield. Between January and March the prisoners are force marched in groups to a new location 160 miles away, but most cannot complete the journey due to disease and malnutrition, and are killed by their guards. Only 6 Australian servicemen are found alive from this group at the end of the war, having escaped from the column, and only 3 of these survived to testify against their guards. All the remaining enlisted RAF prisoners of 205 Sqn., captured at Singapore and Indonesia, died in these death marches (Jardine, wikipedia). On the Russian front Soviet and Allied air forces (French, Czechoslovakian, Polish, etc, units flying under Soviet command) on their front with Germany total over 16,000 fighters, bombers, dive bombers and ground attack aircraft (Passingham & Klepacki). During January #2 Flying Instructor School, Pearce, Alberta, closes (http://www.bombercrew.com/BCATP.htm).
    [Show full text]
  • Quantifying the Effects of Chaff Screening on Hardkill and Softkill Coordination
    UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED Quantifying the Effects of Chaff Screening on Hardkill and Softkill Coordination Nekmohamed Manji, Murat Kocakanat, and Agis Kitsikis Defence R&D Canada – Ottawa Department of National Defence 3701 Carling Ave Ottawa, ON, K1A 0Z4 CANADA Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT For the Navy, Anti-ship Missile Defence (ASMD) is a priority due to the obvious mismatch between a missile threat’s speed and maneuverability compared to a warship. Chaff is an off-board, passive technique that can be combined with a ship maneuver to create an effective tactic for ASMD. The effectiveness of chaff tactics is fundamentally dependent on the chaff radar cross section (RCS) as well as environmental factors including multi-path, sea state and wind conditions; engagement geometry such as threat bearing and ship maneuvers; target and threat properties like ship RCS and sophistication of electronic counter countermeasure (ECCM) features of the threat missile. In the future, hardkill and softkill coordination of maritime platforms is viewed as a force multiplier that will also improve the survivability of the task group. Therefore, the deployment of chaff must be made with consideration to many variables and the resulting optimization problem of developing robust tactics is complex. In this work, we present an application of a chaff modelling tool that can be used to aid in the design and analysis of optimal chaff countermeasures for ASMD. In particular, the effects of chaff screening and interference on the detection and engagement of missile threats for different task group geometries (scenarios) is studied. Our chaff design tool can be used to study the frequency and angular dependence of chaff RCS as a function of time and range for spherical and ellipsoidal chaff clouds.
    [Show full text]
  • The US Army Air Forces in WWII
    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE Air Force Historical Studies Office 28 June 2011 Errata Sheet for the Air Force History and Museum Program publication: With Courage: the United States Army Air Forces in WWII, 1994, by Bernard C. Nalty, John F. Shiner, and George M. Watson. Page 215 Correct: Second Lieutenant Lloyd D. Hughes To: Second Lieutenant Lloyd H. Hughes Page 218 Correct Lieutenant Hughes To: Second Lieutenant Lloyd H. Hughes Page 357 Correct Hughes, Lloyd D., 215, 218 To: Hughes, Lloyd H., 215, 218 Foreword In the last decade of the twentieth century, the United States Air Force commemorates two significant benchmarks in its heritage. The first is the occasion for the publication of this book, a tribute to the men and women who served in the U.S. Army Air Forces during World War 11. The four years between 1991 and 1995 mark the fiftieth anniversary cycle of events in which the nation raised and trained an air armada and com- mitted it to operations on a scale unknown to that time. With Courage: U.S.Army Air Forces in World War ZZ retells the story of sacrifice, valor, and achievements in air campaigns against tough, determined adversaries. It describes the development of a uniquely American doctrine for the application of air power against an opponent's key industries and centers of national life, a doctrine whose legacy today is the Global Reach - Global Power strategic planning framework of the modern U.S. Air Force. The narrative integrates aspects of strategic intelligence, logistics, technology, and leadership to offer a full yet concise account of the contributions of American air power to victory in that war.
    [Show full text]
  • THE DAMS RAID 75 YEARS on Sponsor REVIEWING OPERATION CHASTISE
    CONFERENCE PROGRAMME Air Power / Historical Conference THE DAMS RAID 75 YEARS ON Sponsor REVIEWING OPERATION CHASTISE LONDON / 17 MAY 2018 08:30 Registration & Refreshments 08:55 INTRODUCTION: THE SCOPE OF THE CONFERENCE THE ISSUES OF OPERATION CHASTISE There are many factors to consider when analysing the Dams Raid and some of the issues and assessments remain contentious to this day. This presentation will highlight the major differences between the general view of the mission (based on the 1955 film) and reality. It will question the assignment of priority and aircraft numbers to the dams. The widely varying assessments of the scale and importance of the results achieved will be outlined. A timeline of the mission will also be offered listing the fortunes (and misfortunes) of the three waves of aircraft, the losses and the attacks on the dams. Conference Chairman: Paul Stoddart FRAeS 09:45 THE HISTORIOGRAPHY OF THE DAMS RAID AND 617 SQUADRON Speaker: Dr Peter Gray FRAeS, Senior Research Fellow in Air Power Studies, University of Birmingham 10:30 Networking Break 10:50 STRATEGIC CONTEXT Speaker: Seb Cox, Head of the Air Historical Branch, Royal Air Force 11:35 CHASTISE IN CONTEXT – A SERIOUS DIVERSION OF STRATEGIC STRENGTH? PERSPECTIVES FROM A NAVAL HISTORIAN To understand the significance of the Dams raid one must understand the situation in the war against Germany as a whole including the maritime. Did Bomber Command’s demand for long range aircraft risk jeopardising the Atlantic communications upon which the entire war effort depended? Was the situation in the Atlantic really an overriding priority in British perceptions? How serious were the mercantile losses and what were the real challenges to Allied shipping? Elsewhere, the gamble of Operation Torch was vindicated in May with final victory in North Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • For 30 Minutes, James H. Howard Single-Handedly Fought Off Marauding German Fighters to Defend the B-17S of 401St Bomb Group. for That, He Received the Medal of Honor
    For 30 minutes, James H. Howard single-handedly fought off marauding German fighters to defend the B-17s of 401st Bomb Group. For that, he received the Medal of Honor. One-Man Air Force By Rebecca Grant Mustang pilot who took on the German Air Force single-handedly, and saved on Nazi aircraft and fuel production. our 401st Bomb Group from disaster?” uesday, Jan. 11, 1944, was Devastating missions to targets such wondered Col. Harold Bowman, the a rough day for the B-17Gs as Ploesti in Romania had already unit’s commander. of the 401st Bomb Group. produced Medal of Honor recipients. Soon the bomber pilots knew—and TIt was their 14th mission, but the Many were awarded posthumously, and so did those back home. first one on which they took heavy nearly all went to bomber crewmen. “Maj. James H. Howard was identi- losses—four aircraft missing in ac- Waist gunners, pilots, and naviga- fied today as the lone United States tion after bombing Me 110 fighter tors—all were carrying out heroic acts fighter pilot who for more than 30 production plants at Oschersleben and in the face of the enemy. minutes fought off about 30 Ger- Halberstadt, Germany. The lone P-51 pilot on this bomb- man fighters trying to attack Eighth Turning for home, they witnessed ing run would, in fact, become the Air Force B-17 formations returning an amazing sight: A single P-51 stayed only fighter pilot awarded the Medal from Oschersleben and Halberstadt with them for an incredible 30 minutes of Honor in World War II’s European in Germany,” reported the New York on egress, chasing off German fighters Theater.
    [Show full text]
  • A Tribute to Bomber Command Cranwellians
    RAF COLLEGE CRANWELL “The Cranwellian Many” A Tribute to Bomber Command Cranwellians Version 1.0 dated 9 November 2020 IBM Steward 6GE In its electronic form, this document contains underlined, hypertext links to additional material, including alternative source data and archived video/audio clips. [To open these links in a separate browser tab and thus not lose your place in this e-document, press control+click (Windows) or command+click (Apple Mac) on the underlined word or image] Bomber Command - the Cranwellian Contribution RAF Bomber Command was formed in 1936 when the RAF was restructured into four Commands, the other three being Fighter, Coastal and Training Commands. At that time, it was a commonly held view that the “bomber will always get through” and without the assistance of radar, yet to be developed, fighters would have insufficient time to assemble a counter attack against bomber raids. In certain quarters, it was postulated that strategic bombing could determine the outcome of a war. The reality was to prove different as reflected by Air Chief Marshal Sir Arthur Harris - interviewed here by Air Vice-Marshal Professor Tony Mason - at a tremendous cost to Bomber Command aircrew. Bomber Command suffered nearly 57,000 losses during World War II. Of those, our research suggests that 490 Cranwellians (75 flight cadets and 415 SFTS aircrew) were killed in action on Bomber Command ops; their squadron badges are depicted on the last page of this tribute. The totals are based on a thorough analysis of a Roll of Honour issued in the RAF College Journal of 2006, archived flight cadet and SFTS trainee records, the definitive International Bomber Command Centre (IBCC) database and inputs from IBCC historian Dr Robert Owen in “Our Story, Your History”, and the data contained in WR Chorley’s “Bomber Command Losses of the Second World War, Volume 9”.
    [Show full text]
  • Hidden in Plain Sight: the Secret History of Silicon Valley the Genesis of Silicon Valley Entrepreneurship
    Hidden in Plain Sight: The Secret History of Silicon Valley The Genesis of Silicon Valley Entrepreneurship Marc Andressen Internet Steve Jobs Personal Computers Gordon Moore Integrated Circuits Innovation Networks Hewlett & PackardDefense 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Hidden in Plain Sight: The Secret History of Silicon Valley A few caveats • Not a professional historian • Some of this is probably wrong • All “secrets” are from open-source literature Hidden in Plain Sight: The Secret History of Silicon Valley Six Short Stories Hidden in Plain Sight: The Secret History of Silicon Valley Story 1: WWII The First Electronic War Hidden in Plain Sight: The Secret History of Silicon Valley Strategic Bombing of Germany The Combined Bomber Offensive • British bombed at Night – Area Bombing • Lancaster's • Halifax • Flew at 7 - 17 thousand feet • The American’s by Day – Precision Bombing • B-17’s • B-24’s • Flew at 15 - 25 thousand feet Hidden in Plain Sight: The Secret History of Silicon Valley British and American Air War in Europe 28,000 Active Combat Planes 40,000 planes lost or damaged beyond repair: 18,000 American and 22,000 British 79,265 Americans and 79,281 British killed Hidden in Plain Sight: The Secret History of Silicon Valley Hidden in Plain Sight: The Secret History of Silicon Valley The German Air Defense System The Kammhuber Line • Integrated Electronic air defense network – Covered France, the Low Countries, and into northern Germany • Protection from British/US bomber raids – Warn and Detect – Target and Aim – Destroy Hidden
    [Show full text]
  • Decoying Self-Protection System for Aircraft
    Operational requirement elips Aircraft are called to operate in a wide range of operation theatres where they are required to counter a great variety of threats, more often using decoying self-protection infrared guidance. system for aircraft The proliferation of very short range missiles may also threaten aircraft at any time during peace keeping missions or as a result of terrorist activities. The solution Aircraft are no longer sent into battle without self-protection. Chaff & Flare dispensers are the first essential step offering active protection for the best cost-to-efficiency factor. • Suitable for all types of aircraft Adaptable to all types of aircraft in different configurations, ELIPS is • High decoy capacity already in service on Cougar, Panther, Sokol, Caracal, Embraer 145, • Fully programmable C160, C130, Mirage 5 • In service MBDA Contacts Sales and Business Development 1 avenue Réaumur 92358 Le Plessis-Robinson cedex - France Tel. + 33 (0) 1 71 54 10 00 Fax + 33 (0) 1 71 54 00 01 [email protected] AIR www.mbda-systems.com ELIPS is a decoy dispenser delivering countermeasures against radar and missile threats by optimized ejection Name of chaff and/or flares. It comprises the following units: • ELIPS Cartridge Dispenser Modules (CDMs) The CDMs house the ammunition magazines and perform the interface with the MDU and the magazines. ELIPS can operate up to 12 CDMs. Management and Distribution Unit (MDU) The MDU provides the management of the chaff and flare dispenser and the interface with the aircraft and alarm detectors of the EW system when available. It stores the mission parameters and elaborates the ejection programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Defense and Chemical Warfare in Great Britain, 1915-1945 Jordan I
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-7-2018 Britain Can Take It: Civil Defense and Chemical Warfare in Great Britain, 1915-1945 Jordan I. Malfoy [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FIDC006585 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, Military History Commons, Political History Commons, and the Social History Commons Recommended Citation Malfoy, Jordan I., "Britain Can Take It: Civil Defense and Chemical Warfare in Great Britain, 1915-1945" (2018). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3639. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/3639 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida BRITAIN CAN TAKE IT: CHEMICAL WARFARE AND THE ORIGINS OF CIVIL DEFENSE IN GREAT BRITAIN, 1915 - 1945 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in HISTORY by Jordan Malfoy 2018 To: Dean John F. Stack, Jr. choose the name of dean of your college/school Green School of International and Public Affairs choose the name of your college/school This disserta tion, writte n by Jordan Malfoy, and entitled Britain Can Take It: Chemical Warfare and the Ori gins of Civil D efense i n Great Britain, 1915-1945, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment.
    [Show full text]