Mercy Corps: Baseline Evaluation - PROSPER

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mercy Corps: Baseline Evaluation - PROSPER Photo: Melyn McKay Mercy Corps: Baseline Evaluation - PROSPER Submitted to: Programme Director Ms. Jenny Vaughn 1 March 2016 Executive Overview Introduction This report communicates findings and recommendations derived from the baseline data collection and analysis conducted by Europe Conflict and Security Consulting (ECAS) on behalf of the European Union (EU) funded programme ‘Promoting Sustainable Peace & Resiliency’ in Kayah State (PROSPER, or Paung Si Lett in Myanmar language). It briefly discusses the project work completed in advance of, and in preparation for, the Baseline, including the findings of an Evaluability Assessment (EA) and Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (ME&L) plan redesign, as well as the baseline methodologies. It outlines the most salient findings, particularly those that speak to the overall context, stakeholder relations and perceptions, as well as external factors that are likely to affect the implementation of PROSPER and/or confound or complicate the measurement of desired or expected results. Finally, the report analyses this data against the ME&L framework in order to produce both: 1) recommendations for programmatic changes that are likely to produce greater, more positive impacts and, 2) recommendations for slight changes to both the ME&L framework and methods that are expected to improve the measurement of these impacts, if and when they are achieved. Programme Description Launched in March 2015, PROSPER is a three-year intervention implemented by a consortium comprised of International Rescue Committee (IRC), The Border Consortium (TBC), the Association of Volunteers in International Service (AVSI), Nyein Foundation, and Karuna Mission Social Solidarity (KMSS), and led by Mercy Corps. The programme will be implemented in all seven townships of Kayah State with the aim to deliver results across three interrelated areas known as ‘Expected Results’ (ERs): 1. Governance; 2. Community Driven Development and CSO Capacity Development; 3. Peace building. PROSPER targets four primary stakeholders: government, ethnic armed organisations (EAOs), Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), and ‘communities’, with the latter being broadly defined by the programme but largely conceptualised by consortium partners in terms of villages and village tracts. PROSPER is further divided into ten ‘Activity Areas’ (AAs), delivered by an individual consortium member or, in one instance, by two members in tandem. Otherwise, the programme elements are complementary but not necessarily overlapping, giving the intervention a broad, if not at times diffuse, remit. The Baseline Assessment ECAS believes that external assessment and evaluation should be a consultative, collaborative, and iterative process. As such, ECAS first undertook exploratory research (EA) in order to establish shared understandings of programme and learning objectives, as both implementing 2 partners and beneficiaries articulate them. The EA sought to assess the evaluability of the programme in order to understand the extent to which the programme activities and objectives, as they were initially stated, could be evaluated in a reliable and credible manner. Furthermore the EA looked at the “in principle and in practice” aspects of the programme and sought to present an overview of applicable design approaches and their relative advantages and disadvantages given the programming environment, operational requirements, and available resources. Following on from the EA findings, ECAS worked with PROSPER’s M&E and programme teams, as well as with consortium partners, to redesign the Programme Monitoring Plan (PMP) in order to improve evaluability. This helped to ensure that the ME&L approach would be sufficiently rigorous to monitor and evaluate impact, as well as appropriately aspirational and adaptive, so as to encourage continuous learning and testing of accepted Theories of Change (ToCs). Importantly, the ME&L redesign made the key differences clearer between what Mercy Corps and PROSPER are accountable for, and what they want to learn. Following on from the EA and ME&L redesign, primary data collection for the baseline assessment took place in January 2016 in three townships: Demoso, Hpruso, and Loikaw. An additional wave of data collection occurred in February 2016 in Hpawasng Township. The baseline is qualitative in nature; focus group discussions (FGDs) and Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) were held with numerous stakeholders, existing and target beneficiaries including: • Government representatives (ER1); • EAO representatives (ER1); • CSO members (ER2.1); • Communities benefiting from land rights and sustainable agricultural training (2.2); • Youth enrolled in vocational trainings (ER2.3); • Ceasefire Monitors (ER3.2 and 3.3); • Community Leaders (ER3.4); • Youth engaged as Peace Fellows (ER3.5); • Community members from 16 Village Tracts. Given the scope and scale of the programme activities, the evaluation is rooted in a theory- based contribution analysis. Theory-based approaches attempt to understand an intervention’s contribution to observed results through a mechanistic or process interpretation of causation, rather than determining causation through comparison to a counterfactual. Simultaneously, theory-based approaches seek to identify and assess any significant influencing factors (i.e. contextual factors) that may also play a role in the causal chain and thus affect the contribution claim. ECAS consultants Melyn McKay, Sharon Low, and Khin Chit Win, carried out the baseline research with the support of Karen Sherlock and Simon Richards. ECAS would also like to thank the PROSPER M&E and programme staff, in particular, Yamin Kyaw, Thuta Maung Maung, and Julian Pinzón Godoy, who were highly involved in the evaluation design and data collection. Further, the baseline would not have been possible without the dedicated work of the entire Mercy Corps team in Loikaw, committed consortium partners, and the incredible support of Mercy Corps leadership in both Yangon and Loikaw, notably, U Myat Thu and Ms. Jenny Vaughan. 3 Key Recommendations The following Programmatic Recommendations highlight minor shifts or reconfigurations of the programme approach to improve or maximize impacts. ER1 1) PROSPER is likely to see the greatest impacts under ER1 if the programme focuses on working with government representatives in positions at, and above, the township level. 2) Similarly, under ER1, ECAS recommends that PROSPER identify ways to engage with government representatives who are not working directly in development, specifically those concerned with security, governance, and politics, as these are the representatives least familiar with community-led processes. This may not align with the results of the governance mapping, but reflects the representatives with whom Mercy Corps are likely to achieve the most significant impact in improving knowledge and shifting attitudes. Practice will continue to be constrained by funding and access. 3) PROSPER should aim to encourage government representatives to communicate in more detail about development initiatives. Specifically: A) development initiatives should be communicated both to planned intervention villages and village tracts, but also to all of the villages and village tracts in the immediate surrounding areas; B) community consultations should include a clear and consistent presentation of the overall, long term strategic development vision for the entirety of Kayah state, as well as a discussion of decision making and prioritization criteria, so that communities can situate their own experience of development within the larger framework of change and progress. 4) ECAS recommends that PROSPER focus on creating and supporting opportunities for government representatives to engage with communities around issues of peace and security, specifically targeting rural areas as government representatives at or below the township level already interact with communities regularly. 5) PROSPER should consider combining IBN training elements into EAO representative training as a means of helping EAOs to better support community conversations around immediate development concerns (little d) and larger development goals (big D) as a means of more effectively representing community needs in negotiation with government. IBN training may be similarly beneficial for CSOs implementing under ER2.1, and for local implementing partners, particularly KMSS, if they have not already received commensurate training. ER2 6) CSOs are already engaging in community-led development. However, the evidence to support community-engagement and two-way dialogue around peace and security is less robust, suggesting that CSOs may benefit from support in this area specifically. 4 7) CSOs are at times perceived as offering short term, material solutions. However, there is an issue of scale that likely cannot be addressed by PROSPER given the size of the grant making available in ER2.1. As such, PROSPER should instead focus on addressing sustainability of these small projects, namely, the issue of continued technical assistance and knowledge- transfer related to maintenance of things such as water pipes and rainwater collection systems. 8) There may be an opportunity to engage EAO company members, as they are indirect EAO representatives, and they are likely to overlap with both political structures, and appear somewhat more politically neutral. 9) The ability to articulate long term vision and understanding of community impacts (including plans
Recommended publications
  • Weekly Briefing Note Southeastern Myanmar 5-11 June 2021 (Limited Distribution)
    Weekly Briefing Note Southeastern Myanmar 5-11 June 2021 (Limited Distribution) This weekly briefing note, covering humanitarian developments in Southeastern Myanmar from 5 June to 11 June, is produced by the Kayin Inter-Agency Coordination of the Southeastern Myanmar Working Group. Highlights • The import of soap, detergent and toothpaste from Thailand through the Myawaddy border was suspended on 4 June, according to a letter of notification from the Trades Department.1 • In Kayin State, clashes between the Tatmadaw and Karen National Union (KNU) was observed in Kyainseikgyi, Hpapun and Myawaddy townships and Thandaung town during the week. • A letter ordering the suspension of activities and temporary closure of offices of INGOs in Tanintharyi Region was issued by the Department of Social Welfare on 2 June. The closure of INGOs offices is likely to impact access to services and assistance by vulnerable people in the region. • The Karen National Liberation Army's (KNLA) Chief, General Saw Johny released a statement on 9 June, indicating that the KNLA and its members will follow political leadership of the Karen National Union (KNU). According to the statement signed by Gen. Saw Johny, the KNLA will follow the announcement that was released by the KNU's chairman Saw Mutu Say Poe on 10 May and will follow the framework of the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA) signed by the KNU. The statement also stated that KNLA members must comply with the military rules of the KNLA.2 • The security situation continues to deteriorate in Kayah State. Over 100,000 remain displaced as clashes and military reinforcements brought in by the Tatmadaw continued throughout the week.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of the Union of Myanmar Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation Forest Department
    Leaflet No. 24 The Republic of the Union of Myanmar Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation Forest Department Assessing different livelihood of the local people and causes of forest degradation and deforestation in the Kayah State Dr. Chaw Chaw Sein, Staff Officer Dr. Thaung Naing Oo, Director Kyi Phyu Aung, Range Officer Forest Research Institute December, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS i Abstract ii 1 Introduction 1 2 Objectives 2 3 Literature Review 2 3.1 What do we mean by sustainable livelihoods? 2 3.2 Why are sustainable livelihoods important for conservation? 3 3.3 How do we identify locally appropriate livelihoods strategies? 3 4 Material and Method 5 4.1 Study Area 5 4.2 Data collection and analysis 6 5 Results and Discussion 6 5.1 Livelihood surveys in the Kayah Region 6 5.2 Causes of forest degradation and deforestation in the study area 12 6 Conclusions and Recommendation 15 7 Acknowledgements 17 8 References 18 ၊ ၊ ၊ ၊ ၁.၄% Assessing different livelihood of the local people and causes of forest degradation and deforestation in the Kayah State Dr. Chaw ChawSein, Staff Officer Dr. Thaung Naing Oo, Director Thein Saung, Staff Officer Kyi Phyu Aung , Range Officer Abstract About annual rate of 1.4% of the forest degradation and deforestation was occurred in Myanmar. There are many causes of deforestation and forest degradation. Especially in the hilly region like Kayah state, the main causes of forest degradation and deforestation are due to shifting cultivation. The present study reports different livelihood activities to settle their daily needs in the Kayah areas and the causes of forest degradation and deforestation.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Report
    Livelihood, Land Use and Customary Tenure in YUSOMOSO Report of a Participatory Action Research Karuna Mission Social Solidarity 2017 Livelihood, Land Use and Customary Tenure in Yusomoso Report of a participatory action research Karuna Mission Social Solidarity (KMSS)-Loikaw Copyright © KMSS-Loikaw 2017 The contents of this book may be reproduced and distributed for non-commercial purposes if prior notice is given to the copyright holders and the source and authors are duly acknowledged. Published by Karuna Mission Social Solidarity (KMSS)-Loikaw KMSS: www.kmss-caritasmyanmar.org Written by: KMSS-Loikaw Livelihood Programme team Editing: Christian Erni Layout and Cover Design: Nabwong Chuaychuwong Photos: Alesio Ngairi (Fig. 12, 13, 16, 20, 21, 24, 25) Anne Mary Ne Nel (Fig. 01, 08, 14, 22, 23, 26); Christian Erni (Fig. 04, 09, 19) Gam Angkang Shimray (Fig. 10) Maps: Nabwong Chuaychuwong (Fig. 02); all other maps and satellite images were created by Elena Cover photos: Christian Erni, Alesio Ngairi Printed in Yangon by Myint color offset This publication has been produced with financial support from MISEREOR, the International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA) and the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. CONTENTS Introduction 2 I The Community And Its History 4 1. Yusomoso community 4 Demography of Yusomoso 6 2. History of Yusomoso 8 II Livelihood And Land Use 20 1. Livelihood 20 Rice cultivation 20 Other crops 22 Other sources of income 22 2. Land use 25 Village settlement area 27 Church land 27 Common land for Church use 27 Cemetery 27 Farm land 28 Forest land 33 Grazing land 34 Bamboo land 35 III Customary Tenure And Management Of Land And Resources 36 1.
    [Show full text]
  • State Counsellor Attends Dinner Hosted by Boris Johnson, Visits St. Mary's Hospital
    KS 230 MILLION FOR TOWN DEVELOPMENT IN NORTHERN RAKHINE P-3 Vol. IV, No. 20, 12th Waxing of Kason 1379 ME www.globalnewlightofmyanmar.com Sunday, 7 May 2017 NATIONAL Gov’t to amend 1998 cultural heritage law as it steps up for enlisting Bagan in World Heritage list PAGE-2 NATIONAL Meeting on socio- economic development and resettlement in Rakhine State PAGES-3 Daw Aung San Suu Kyi views the medical treatment demonstration with the use of modern teaching aid at St. Mary’s Hospital. PHOTO: MNA State Counsellor attends dinner hosted by Boris Johnson, visits NATIONAL Kayah State Chief Minister assists in St. Mary’s Hospital repairing gale-hit houses STATE Counsellor Daw Aung exchanged and discussions help by Britain in the Myanmar equipment. PAGES-3 San Suu Kyi, who is currently in held on promotion of Myan- Peace and national unity pro- Serving as an academ- London, UK on an official visit, mar-Britain bilateral relations cess. ic health science centre, St. attended a dinner hosted by and cooperation, improving At 3 p.m local time, the Mary’s Hospital is cooper- Today issue con- British Foreign Secretary Rt. the professional qualifications State Counsellor and party ating with and assisting the tains an eight-page Hon. Boris Johnson at Carl- of the Myanmar Police force, visited St. Mary’s Hospital in Myanmar Ministry of Health ton Gardens, London Friday cementing cooperation in ed- London and viewed the medical and Sports in teaching medi- special pull-out evening. ucation and health sectors, treatment demonstration us- cal subjects.—Myanmar News supplement.
    [Show full text]
  • Rundbrief 03/2018
    Rundbrief März 2018 Liebe Projekt-Burma Freunde, Heute wollen wir Sie wieder einmal über unsere Arbeit in Myanmar informieren und Ihnen unser neues Projektgebiet Kayah State vorstellen. Unser neues Mitglied, Herr Dr. Georg Noack vom Linden-Museum Stuttgart, verbrachte dieses Jahr schon einige Wochen in diesem Gebiet und nach seiner Rückkehr erzählte er uns von den Menschen dort. Er erzählte, wie arm sie sind, welche Probleme sie haben und dass sie dringend unsere Hilfe benötigen. Zuerst für 6 Kindergärten in 6 verschiedenen kleinen Bergdörfern, damit die Kleinen dort gut versorgt sind, während ihre Eltern auf den Feldern für ihr täglich Brot arbeiten. Und auf den nächsten Seiten möchte ich Ihnen gerne ein wenig mehr über dieses Gebiet und die Kinder im Kayah State erzählen. – 2 – Myanmar Information Management Unit Die grüne Fläche ist der Kayah StateDi sundtric unseret Map Projekt- Kaya-Gebieteh State befinden sich in Hoya Parish im Westen. 97°0'E 97°30'E N N ' ' 0 0 ° ° 0 0 2 2 INDIA CHINA SHAN STATE Ü Pekon THAILAND Homein !( Loikaw Loikaw .! Shadaw Demoso Demoso N N ' ' 0 0 3 Shadaw 3 ° ° 9 9 1 1 Hpruso Loikaw District Hpruso KAYAH STATE Bawlakhe Ywarthit !( Bawlake Bawlake District N N ' ' 0 0 ° ° 9 9 1 1 Baw Ga Li !( Hpasawng Hpasawng THAILAND KAYIN STATE Mese Mese Legend .! State/Region Capital Map ID: MIMU764v04 Main Town Creation Date: 23 October 2017.A4 Projection/Datum: Geographic/WGS84 !( Other Town Data Sources: MIMU Township Boundary Base Map: MIMU State/Region Boundary Boundaries: MIMU/WFP N N ' Place Name: Ministry of Home Affairs (GAD) ' 0 0 3 3 ° International Boundary translated by MIMU ° 8 8 1 1 Road Email: [email protected] Website: www.themimu.info Bawlake Copyright © Myanmar Information Management Unit Kilometers Loikaw 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenging Myanmar's Centralized Energy Model
    ETHNIC NATIONALITIES AFFAIRS CENTER CHALLENGING MYANMAR’S CENTRALIZED ENERGY MODEL ETHNIC NATIONALITIES AFFAIRS CENTER (UNION OF BURMA) P.O. Box 5, Chang Puak, A. Mueang Chiang Mai 50302, Thailand www.burmaenac.org Challenging Myanmar’s Centralized Energy Model 1 Printing Information First Edition: July 2020 Copies: 1,000 Distributor: Ethnic Nationalities Affairs Center (Union of Burma) Photo: ENAC Design: Ying Tzarm Address: P.O Box 5, Chang Peauk, A.Mueang Chiang Mai 50302, Thailand ETHNIC NATIONALITIES AFFAIRS CENTER CHALLENGING MYANMAR’S CENTRALIZED ENERGY MODEL JULY 2020 CONTENTS Page Foreword 1 Acronyms 3 Executive Summary 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 1.1 Structure of the Paper 10 1.2 Research Methodology 10 1.3 Myanmar Energy and Power Overview 11 1.3.1 Crude Oil 12 1.3.2 Natural Gas and Power Plant Development 14 1.3.3 Coal Deposits and Power Plant Development 20 1.3.4 Solar and Wind Power Plant Development 21 1.3.5 Existing Hydropower Plants in the States/Regions 23 1.3.6 Overview of National Electrification 28 1.3.7 Energy/Power Development Projects and Conflict 37 Chapter 2: The Role of the State/Regional Governments in Power/Energy Sector 41 2.1 Energy Executive Body of the State/Regional Governments 41 2.2 Energy Related Taxation Authority of the State/Regional and Union Governments 49 2.3 Energy-related Legislative Authority of the State/Regional Governments 52 2.4 The Role of State/Regional Governments in Energy Investment Sector 52 2.5 Procedure for Environmental Impact Assessment or an Initial Environmental Examination
    [Show full text]
  • Yangon University of Economics Master of Development Studies Programme
    YANGON UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS MASTER OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES PROGRAMME A STUDY ON THE COMMUNITY-BASED TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN KAYAH STATE THET MON SOE EMDevS – 43 (15TH BATCH) DECEMBER, 2019 YANGON UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS MASTER OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES PROGRAMME A STUDY ON THE COMMUNITY-BASED TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN KAYAH STATE A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Development Studies (MDevS) Supervised by: Submitted by: Daw Yin Myo Oo Thet Mon Soe Associate Professor Roll No. 43 Department of Economics EMDevS (15th Batch) Yangon University of Economics 2017-2019 December, 2019 YANGON UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS MASTER OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES PROGRAMME This is to certify that the thesis entitled “A Study on the Community-Based Tourism Development in Kayah State”, submitted as a partial fulfillment towards the requirements for the degree of Master of Development Studies had been accepted by the Board of Examiners. BOARD OF EXAMINERS 1. Dr. Tin Win Rector Yangon University of Economics (Chief Examiner) 2. Dr. Ni Lar Myint Htoo Pro-Rector Yangon University of Economics (Examiner) 3. Dr. Cho Cho Thein Professor and Head Department of Economics Yangon University of Economics (Examiner) 4. Daw Nyunt Nyunt Shwe Professor and Head (Retired) Department of Applied Economics Yangon University of Economics (Examiner) 5. Dr. Tha Pye Nyo Professor Department of Economics Yangon University of Economics (Examiner) December, 2019 ABSTRACT Community-Based Tourism (CBT) is gaining prestige in developing countries as an alternative to mass tourism. The main approach of CBT is to ensure environmental, social and cultural sustainability while empowering the local community.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace Is Living with Dignity
    PEACE IS LIVING WITH DIGNITY VOICES OF COMMUNITIES FROM MYanmar’s ceasefIRE AREAS IN 2016 PEACE IS LIVING WITH DIGNITY Voices of Communities from Myanmar’s ceasefire areas in 2016 i PEACE IS LIVING WITH DIGNITY Voices of Communities from Myanmar’s ceasefire areas in 2016 Listening methodology development: Soth Plai Ngarm Listening Project Implementation (Training, Processing, Writing) Coordinator and Editor: Karen Simbulan Team members: Laurens Visser, Tengku Shahpur, Harshadeva Amarathunga Myanmar Partner Organisations Karuna Myanmar Social Services (Kachin) Ta’ang Student and Youth Union (Northern Shan) Pyi Nyein Thu Kha (Southern Shan) Karen Development Network (Kayin) Kayah State Peace Monitoring Network (Kayah) Mon Women Network (Mon) Cover photo: Karlos Manlupig Inside photographs: Zabra Yu Siwa, Shutterstock, Listener from Northern Shan Copy-editing: Husnur Esthiwahyu Lay-out: Boonruang Song-ngam Publisher: Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies Funding: Peace Support Fund ISBN- 13: 978 99963 856 4 3 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies (CPCS) is grateful to our Myanmar partner organisations that provided invaluable assistance throughout the project. We could not have done this without you. We are especially grateful to all the individuals who volunteered to be listeners. We appreciate the time, energy and enthusiasm that you demonstrated throughout the process, and your willingness to travel to remote areas. We would also like to express our heartfelt gratitude to the community members from Kachin, Northern Shan, Southern Shan, Kayah, Kayin, and Mon states who were willing to take the time out of their busy lives to share their opinions, experiences, knowledge, concerns and hopes for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Raising the Curtain
    Raising the Curtain Cultural Norms, Social Practices and Gender Equality in Myanmar 1 We, both women and men, hold equal opportunities and chances since we were born, as we all are, human beings. Most women think that these opportunities and favours are given by men. No, these are our own opportunities and chances to live equally and there is no need to thank men for what they are not doing. Focus Group Discussion with Muslim women, aged 18-25, Mingalartaung Nyunt Township The Gender Equality Network Yangon, Myanmar © All rights reserved Published in Yangon, Myanmar, Gender Equality November 2015 Network 2 Cultural Norms, Social Practices and Gender Equality in Myanmar 3 Contents Acronyms 6 Acknowledgements 7 Executive Summary 8 1. Introduction 10 1.1 Background and Rationale 12 1.2 Objectives and Study Questions 12 1.3 Methodology - In Brief 13 2. Setting the Scene 16 2.1 ‘The Problem is that the Problem is not Seen as a Problem’ 17 2.2 Historical Narratives: Women’s High Status and Comparisons with Other Countries 18 2.3 Gender Inequality and Gender Discrimination: Where is the Problem? 21 2.4 Gender Equality as a ‘Western’ Concept 25 3. Cultural and Religious Norms and Practices 26 3.1 Culture in Myanmar, and Myanmar Culture 27 3.2 The Inseparability of Culture and Religion 29 3.3 Women as Bearers of Culture 30 3.4 The Role of Nuns in Buddhism 32 3.5 Hpon, Respect and Male Superiority 34 3.6 Purity, Female Inferiority and Exclusion 37 3.7 Modesty, Male Sexuality and the Importance of Women’s Dress 38 3.8 The Construction of Ideal Masculinity 41 3.9 Letting the Birds Rest on the Pagoda: Controlling the Self, Enduring Hardship and Sacrificing 42 4.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chance to Fix in Time” Analysis of Freedom of Expression in Four Years Under the Current Government
    Athan – Freedom of Expression Activist Organization “A Chance to Fix in Time” Analysis of Freedom of Expression in Four Years Under the Current Government 4 Research Report “A Chance to Fix in Time” Analysis of Freedom of Expression in Four Years Under the Current Government Research Report Athan – Freedom of Expression Activist Organization A Chance to Fix in Time: Analysis of Freedom of Expression in Four Years Under the Current Government Table of Contents Chapters Contents Pages Organisational Background d - Research Methodology 2 - Photo Copyright Chapter (1): Introduction 2 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Overall Analysis of Prosecutions within Four Years 4 Chapter (2): Freedom of Expression 8 2.1 Lawsuits under Telecommunications Law 9 2.2 Lawsuits under the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security 14 of Citizens 2.3 National Record and Archive Law 17 2.4 Lawsuits under Section 505(a), (b) and (c) of the Penal Code 18 2.5 Lawsuits under Section 500 of the Penal Code 23 2.6 Electronic Transactions Law Must Be Repealed 24 2.7 Lawsuits with Sedition Charge under Section 124(a) of the 25 Penal Code 2.8 Lawsuits under Section 295 of the Penal Code 26 2.9 Three Stats Where Free Expression Violated Most 27 Chapter (3): Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Procession 30 3.1 More Restrictions Included in Drafted Amendment Bill 31 Chapter (4): Media Freedom 34 4.1 News Media Law Lacks of Protection for Media Freedom and 34 Journalistic Rights 4.2 The Tatmadaw’s Filing Lawsuits Against Irrawaddy and 36 Reuters News Agencies a Table of Contents A Chance to
    [Show full text]
  • Earth Rights Abuses in Burma Exposed
    Gaining Ground: Earth Rights Abuses in Burma Exposed Earth Rights School of Burma Class of 2008 Preface People can create a better world if they have the desire, enthusiasm and knowledge to do so. Furthermore, unity of thought and unity of action are needed in the international community to bring about positive changes and sustainable development around the globe. In a long list of important goals, eradication of poverty and protection and promotion of human rights and environmental rights are top priorities. People power is pivotal and improving the connections among individuals, organizations and governments is essential. Greater knowledge is important at every level and every actor in the international community must strive to create a better world in the future. Of course, this improvement would come from both local and global actions. In fact, to my knowledge, the students and EarthRights School (ERS) itself are trying their best to cooperate and to coordinate with the international community for the above-mentioned noble tasks. By starting from localized actions, many ethnic youths from various areas of Burma come, study and have been working together at ERS. They exchange their experiences and promote knowledge and expertise not only during their school term but also after they graduate and through practical work that improves society. In Burma, according to the international communitys highly-regarded research and field documents, human rights violations are rampant, poverty is too high, environmental issues are neglected and good governance is non-existent. This may be a normal situation under military dictatorships around the world but it is not a permanent situation and history has proved that if democratic people have enough power, things will change sooner or later.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of the Union of Myanmar Preparatory Survey on Distribution
    Electricity Supply Enterprise Ministry of Electric Power Republic of the Union of Myanmar Republic of the Union of Myanmar Preparatory Survey on Distribution System Improvement Project in Main Cities Final Report July 2015 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc. 1R Nippon Koei Co., Ltd. JR 15-033 Table of contents Chapter 1 Background ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Survey schedule .......................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.3 JICA survey team and counterpart .............................................................................................. 1-5 Chapter 2 Present Status ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1 Present status of the power distribution sector ........................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Movement of Corporatization and franchising ........................................................................... 2-6 2.3 Electricity Tariff .......................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.3.1 Number of Consumers .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]