The INTERCAFE Field Manual

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The INTERCAFE Field Manual Research methodsforCormorants,fishes, Research The INTERCAFEFieldManual and theinteractionsbetweenthem Photograph — Shutterstock The INTERCAFE Field Manual Research methods for Cormorants, fishes, and the interactions between them Shutterstock — Photograph Dave Carss, Rosemarie Parz-Gollner & Josef Trauttmansdorff THE INTERCAFE FIELD MANUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This publication has been produced Russell, Josef Trauttmansdorff, During the drafting process, the by INTERCAFE’s Work Group 1, Mennobart van Eerden, Stef van Field Manual was reviewed by the the ‘Ecological Databases and Rijn, Catarina Vinagre, and Stefano Work Group and was also made Analyses’ group, which comprised Volponi. Additional text was available to all INTERCAFE 24 researchers from 22 countries provided by Stuart Newson (British participants for comment and across Europe and beyond (for full Trust for Ornithology, UK). correction. Numerous participants details of WG1 participants, please from INTERCAFE’s other two see Appendix Three). Helpful comments and corrections Work Groups made contributions on various drafts were provided by to the WG1 meetings, and these This publication was drafted the above and also by: Ian Winfield meetings were also informed by Thomas Bregnballe, Dave (Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, on occasions by discussions Carss, Henri Engström, Manfred Lancaster, UK). with invited experts and local Enstipp, Susana Franca, Marijan stakeholders. Wherever appropriate, Govedic, Robert Gwiazda, A number of people also kindly information from these sources Reinhard Haunschmid, Sven- provided photographs for inclusion has also been incorporated into the Hakon Lorentsen, Petr Musil, and individual sources are INTERCAFE Field Manual. Ivailo Nikolov, Jean-Yves Paquet, acknowledged under each picture. Rosemaire Parz-Gollner, Ian [2] THE INTERCAFE FIELD MANUAL CONTENTS 1 PREFACE 5 7 INTRODUCTION Part Two — Working with Fishes 74 2 INTRODUCTION 7.1 European fish diversity 75 Part One — Working with Cormorants 9 7.2 Fish distribution and movements 76 2.1 The Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) 9 7.3 Fish communities and assemblages 76 2.2 Some important words of warning 12 7.4 Ecosystem-level factors affecting fishes 77 7.5 Defining fish populations 78 3 COUNTING CORMORANTS 14 7.6 Estimating fish abundance 79 3.1 Introduction 14 3.2 Breeding colony counts 15 8 ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE OF FISH SPECIES 80 3.4 How to use numbers? 26 8.1 Estimating abundance of marine and 3.5 Estimating breeding success 30 coastal fish species 80 8.2 Estimating abundance of freshwater fish 4 CORMORANT DIET, FOOD AND ENERGY species 84 INTAKE 35 8.3 Problems in estimating the abundance of 4.1 Introduction 35 fish 89 4.2 Feeding observations 37 4.3 Pellet collection and analysis 37 9 INDICATORS OF CORMORANT DAMAGE 92 4.4 Stomach contents analysis 42 9.1 Wounding of fish 92 4.5 A note on regurgitations 44 9.2 Damage at fish farms 93 4.6 Reference collection 45 9.3 Damage to wild stocks 94 4.7 Bioenergetics 46 10 ATTEMPTING TO INTEGRATE CORMORANT 5 SEXING, AGEING AND MEASURING AND FISH DATA 96 CORMORANTS 54 10.1 Introduction 96 5.1 Introduction 54 10.2 Interpreting understandings of 5.2 Plumage colouration — age determination 56 Cormorant ‘impact’ at fisheries 97 5.3 Body measurements — sex determination 58 10.3 Introduction to the ecological 5.4 Large Samples — sex and age discrimination 59 perspective 101 5.5 Racial identity (carbo, sinensis) 62 10.4 Review of some key considerations for 5.6 Measurements from nestlings 64 Cormorant-fisheries interactions 103 10.5 The effect of Cormorant predation on 6 MOVEMENTS 66 fish — some words on data requirements 104 6.1 Introduction 66 10.6 Predator-prey relationships — some 6.2 Metal-rings 67 concepts 106 6.3 Colour-rings 68 10.7 Using fish stock assessments as a basis 6.4 Reading colour-rings on Cormorants 69 for assessing Cormorant impact 107 6.5 Reporting sightings of ringed Cormorants 70 10.8 Natural regulation in fish populations 108 6.6 Some ideas for using colour-rings for new 10.9 The effect of natural variation on studies 72 production and catches 109 6.7 More general information, selection of 10.10 Why do biologists find it difficult to useful links 72 measure a Cormorant ‘impact’ at fisheries? 110 www.intercafeproject.net [3] THE INTERCAFE FIELD MANUAL 10.11 Manipulative field experiments and 12 APPENDIX TWO: NATIONAL AND understanding complex ecological INTERNATIONAL CORMORANT COUNTS, processes 113 EXAMPLES OF DATA FORMS 135 10.12 How best to make progress? Data requirements and methodology 115 13 APPENDIX THREE: WORK GROUP 1 10.13 Concluding remarks — integrating MEMBERSHIP 140 perspectives 119 REFERENCES 121 11 APPENDIX ONE: RELATED CORMORANT SPECIES IN EUR0PE 131 11.1 Pygmy Cormorant (Phalacrocorax pygmeus) 131 11.2 European Shag (Phalacrocorax aristotelis) 133 [4] THE INTERCAFE FIELD MANUAL 1 PREFACE This publication is supported by the context of the interdisciplinary Norway, Serbia) and the Middle COST. It is one of the outputs of the management of human-wildlife East (Israel). In addition to these INTERCAFE COST Action (635). conflicts at local to international 28 countries, Ukraine and Croatia COST (European Cooperation in levels across Europe. It also were also associated with the Science and Technology) is the aimed at delivering a coordinated Action. INTERCAFE held a series longest-running intergovernmental information exchange system of eight meetings, each themed network for cooperation in research and improved communication around a topic particularly relevant across Europe. between stakeholders. To this end, to the host country: INTERCAFE attempted INTERCAFE — Conserving to address:- 1. Gdansk, Poland, April biodiversity: interdisciplinary 2005 — ‘Cormorant ecology, initiative to reduce pan-European i. The fundamental distrust commercial fishing and Cormorant-fishery conflicts — was between the main stakeholder stakeholder interaction’ awarded funding for four years groups which was compounded 2. Saxony, Germany, September (2004–2008). COST Actions are by the disparate and 2005 — ‘Commercial carp charged with directing European uncoordinated nature of aquaculture’ science and do not pay for available sources of information, 3. Hula Valley, Israel, January researchers’ time. Instead, funding ii. the necessity of applying an 2006 — ‘Cormorant-fishery was available for INTERCAFE integrated interdisciplinary conflict management in the Hula to organise and run a series of research approach (biological, Valley, Israel’ international meetings, drawing social, legal) to Cormorant- 4. Bohinj, Slovenia, October together researchers from a fishery conflicts (as these are 2006 — ‘Angling and EU number of disciplines (bird- as much a matter of human legislation’ related and broader ecology, interests as they are of biology 5. Hanko, Finland, April fisheries science and management, or ecology), thus recognising 2007 — ‘What to do when the sociology, social anthropology the need for different Cormorant comes’ and international law) and other perspectives in the development 6. Po Delta, Italy, September experts (very often connected of collaborative strategies, and 2007 — ‘Extensive aquaculture with fisheries production, harvest iii the lack of an integrated systems and relationships and management, or to regional/ understanding of the between stakeholder national policy and decision- interdisciplinary factors at the perspectives and different making). Under INTERCAFE’s heart of Cormorant-fisheries spatial and institutional levels’ coordination, interested parties, conflicts that precludes the 7. South Bohemia, from local stakeholders to provision of useful and practical Czech Republic, April international policy-makers, were information and advice to all 2008 — ‘Management practices thus offered a unique opportunity interested/affected parties. in a complex habitat mosaic and to address European Cormorant- at local, regional and national fisheries issues. The INTERCAFE network levels’ comprised almost seventy 8. Paris, France, September The main objective of researchers from all 27 EU Member 2008 — ‘The management of INTERCAFEwas to improve States (except Luxemburg, Malta Cormorant-fisheries conflicts in European scientific knowledge of and Spain) and other countries France and the wider European Cormorant-fisheries interactions in in continental Europe (Georgia, context’ www.intercafeproject.net [5] THE INTERCAFE FIELD MANUAL At each meeting, INTERCAFE as possible given the budgetary an integrated synthesis (ISBN participants worked in one of three and time constraints on all of 978-1-906698-065) at http://www. Work Groups, covering the broad INTERCAFE’s participants. intercafeproject.net aims of the Action: The INTERCAFE publications are: Drawing on INTERCAFE’s ▪ Work Group One — Ecological ability to develop a network of Databases and Analyses ▪ Cormorants and the European researchers and the Action’s ▪ Work Group Two — Conflict Environment: exploring privileged opportunity to see and Resolution and Management Cormorant status and distribution hear about Cormorant-fishery ▪ Work Group Three — Linking on a continental scale. issues across Europe and beyond, Science with Policy and Best (ISBN 978-1-906698-07-2) ‘The INTERCAFE Field Manual’ Practice ▪ The INTERCAFE Field is a review of the methods used by Manual: research methods for researchers to study the ecology of Most meetings included a field Cormorants, fishes, and the both Cormorants and fishes, and visit to allow participants to see interactions between them. an
Recommended publications
  • Wetland Birds in the Recent Fossil Record of Britain and Northwest Europe John R
    Wetland birds in the recent fossil record of Britain and northwest Europe John R. Stewart 18. Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus, Deep Bay, Mai Po, Hong Kong, February 1995. Geological evidence suggests that Dalmatian Pelicans bred in Britain, and in other western European countries (including The Netherlands and Denmark), prior to and during the Iron Age. Ray Tipper. ABSTRACT Wetland habitats in Britain and other parts of western Europe have been severely depleted during the latter part of the Holocene owing principally to drainage and land reclamation. Changes in the distribution of a number of wetland bird species can be gauged from archaeological and geological site records of larger birds, whose remains are generally better preserved. Key species are discussed here, including a heron Nycticorax fenensis and a crane Grus primigenia, two extinct species named on possibly uncertain fossil evidence. We can let our minds wander back to the misty realms of fifteen hundred years ago, to a wonderful Britain which was alive with bird song from coast to coast, which sheltered wolves, bears and boars in its dark woodlands, cranes in its marshes, bustards on its heaths and beavers by its streams, and we can visualize the great pink pelican sweeping on its huge pinions over the reedy waterways which then penetrated by secret paths into the very heart of what is now Somerset. (Whitlock, 1953) © British Birds 97 • January 2004 • 33-43 33 Wetland birds in the recent fossil record f all the major habitats in northwest species, including Mute Swan Cygnus olor and Europe, wetlands may have been the Common Crane, may have become physically Omost severely depleted during the smaller owing to habitat impoverishment.
    [Show full text]
  • BOURGAS LAST.Pmd
    WATERBIRDS OF BOURGAS WETLANDS RESULTS AND EVALUATION OF THE MONTHLY WATERBIRD MONITORING 1996 - 2002 Milko Dimitrov, Tanyo Michev, Lyubomir Profirov, Konstantin Nyagolov 1 WATERBIRDS OF BOURGAS WETLANDS 2 Milko Dimitrov, Tanyo Michev, Lyubomir Profirov, Konstantin Nyagolov WATERBIRDS OF BOURGAS WETLANDS RESULTS AND EVALUATION OF THE MONTHLY WATERBIRD MONITORING 1996 - 2002 Drawings Assen Ignatov Cover design Ivan Yanchev Editor of English Translation Vladimir Pomakov PENSOFT PUBLISHERS BULGARIAN BIODIVERSITY FOUNDATION BOURGAS WETLANDS PUBLICATION SERIES No 6 2005 3 WATERBIRDS OF BOURGAS WETLANDS WATERBIRDS OF BOURGAS WETLANDS Results and Evaluation of the Monthly Waterbird Monitoring 1996 - 2002 Milko Dimitrov, Tanyo Michev, Lyubomir Profirov, Konstantin Nyagolov We dedicate this book to Alexandur Prostov (1926 – 2000), born in Bourgas, who was one of the first to draw the attention of the Bulgarian public to the exceptional richness and diversity of the wildlife and especially the birds of Bourgas Lakes First published 2005 Pensoft Publishers ISBN 954-642-236-3 Pensoft Series Faunistica No 44 ISSN 1312-0174 Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation ISBN 954-9959-33-3 This book was published with the financial support of the Swiss Agency for Development and Co-operation We recommend this book to be cited in the following way: Dimitrov, M., T. Michev, L. Profirov, K. Nyagolov. 2005. Waterbirds of Bourgas Wetlands. Results and Evaluation of the Monthly Waterbird Monitoring 1996-2002. Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation and Pensoft Publishers, Sofia–Moscow, 160 pp. On the back cover: Sattelite photo of the region of Bourgas Bay (Original Data © ESA; 1992; Distributed by Eurimage) © PENSOFT Publishers All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo copying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • D4.2.1 Review of the Knowledge of the Target Species at the Selected
    ECOlogical observing System in the Adriatic Sea: oceanographic observations for biodiversity Priority Axis 3: Environment and cultural heritage Specific Objective 3.2: Contribute to protect and restore biodiversity D4.2.1 Review of the knowledge of the target species at the selected Natura 2000 sites WP4 – Establishing the Ecological Observing System in the Adriatic Sea (ECOAdS) A4.2 – Integration of ecological observing system with Natura 2000 target species PP5 Blue World Institute / Jure Miočić-Stošić, Grgur Pleslić Other involved partners: PP1, PP4, PP6, PP8 Final Public 29th June 2020 European Regional Development Fund www.italy-croatia.eu/ecoss Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. ALGAE .................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Fucus (Fucus virsoides) ........................................................................................................................ 7 3. PLANTS .................................................................................................................................................. 9 3.1 Virginia saltmarsh mallow (Kosteletzkya pentacarpos) ...................................................................... 9 3.2 Venice salicorne (Salicornia veneta) ................................................................................................. 10
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinese Cormorant Phalacrocorax Carbo Sinensis Blumenbach 1798, an Alien Bird by Christer Olburs 2008-10-15
    The chinese cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis Blumenbach 1798, an alien bird by Christer Olburs 2008-10-15 The chinese cormorant, Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis Blumenbach 1798, an alien bird - An attempt to understand a complex biological question by Christer Olburs, 15/10/2008 This is an English translation of the essay “Den kinesiska skarven Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis Blumenbach 1798, en främmande fågel” by Christer Olburs 20081015. The translation by Snabboversattare.se was financed by Lennart Ericsson and approved by Christer Olburs on 16/12/2009 The chinese cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis Blumenbach 1798, an alien bird by Christer Olburs 2008-10-15 To Sven, Esbjörn and Curt The chinese cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis Blumenbach 1798, an alien bird by Christer Olburs 2008-10-15 Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................4 2. A few biological concepts and units ..................................................................................6 One method: What? Where? and When? ...............................................................................7 3. “The Great Cormorant’s” systematics, taxonomy and nomenclature.................................9 Modern Great Cormorant systematics ....................................................................................9 Comments ..............................................................................................................................11 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Arabian Peninsula
    THE CONSERVATION STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE BREEDING BIRDS OF THE ARABIAN PENINSULA Compiled by Andy Symes, Joe Taylor, David Mallon, Richard Porter, Chenay Simms and Kevin Budd ARABIAN PENINSULA The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM - Regional Assessment About IUCN IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges. IUCN’s work focuses on valuing and conserving nature, ensuring effective and equitable governance of its use, and deploying nature-based solutions to global challenges in climate, food and development. IUCN supports scientific research, manages field projects all over the world, and brings governments, NGOs, the UN and companies together to develop policy, laws and best practice. IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, with almost 1,300 government and NGO Members and more than 15,000 volunteer experts in 185 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by almost 1,000 staff in 45 offices and hundreds of partners in public, NGO and private sectors around the world. www.iucn.org About the Species Survival Commission The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions with a global membership of around 7,500 experts. SSC advises IUCN and its members on the wide range of technical and scientific aspects of species conservation, and is dedicated to securing a future for biodiversity. SSC has significant input into the international agreements dealing with biodiversity conservation. About BirdLife International BirdLife International is the world’s largest nature conservation Partnership. BirdLife is widely recognised as the world leader in bird conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • AMNH Digital Library
    About 1.6 million people die of tuberculosis (TB) each year' mostly in developing nations lacking access to fast, accurate testing technology. TB is the current focus of the Foundation for Fino Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), established with ^" loundation ^ funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. for innovative new diagnostics FIND is dedicated to the advancement of diagnostic testing for infectious diseases in developing countries. For more information, visit www.finddiagnostics.org. Partnering against TB Twenty-two developing countries carry the burden culture from 42 days to as little as 10-14 days. In of 80 percent of the world's cases of TB, the addition, by identifying resistance to specific drugs, second-leading killer among infectious diseases the BD MGIT™ system provides fast and reliable and primary cause of death among people with information that can help physicians prescribe HIV/AIDS. The problem is compounded by TB's more effective treatments. All this can contribute resistance to drug treatment, limiting the options to the reduction in spread and mortality of TB, for over 450,000 patients annually. particularly in the HIV/AIDS population, where it is especially difficult to diagnose. BD is pleased to work with FIND to provide equipment, reagents, training and support to the Named one of America's Most Admired public health sector in high-burdened countries Companies' as well as one of the World's IVIost on terms that will enable them to purchase and Ethical Companies/ BD provides advanced medical implement these on a sustainable basis. technology to serve the global community's greatest needs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of Birds Recorded in the Marshes of Southern Iraq, 2005–2008
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal BioRisk 3: 205–219A (2009) summary of birds recorded in the marshes of southern Iraq, 2005–2008 205 doi: 10.3897/biorisk.3.14 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.pensoftonline.net/biorisk Biodiversity & Ecosystem Risk Assessment A summary of birds recorded in the marshes of southern Iraq, 2005–2008 Mudhafar Salim1, Richard Porter2, Clayton Rubec3 1 Nature Iraq, Sulaimani, Kurdistan, Iraq 2 BirdLife International, Cambridge, United Kingdom 3 Centre for Environmental Stewardship and Conservation, Ottawa, Canada Corresponding author: Mudhafar Salim ([email protected]) Academic editors: F. Krupp, I. Weidig | Received 13 March 2009 | Accepted 2 October 2009 | Published 28 December 2009 Citation: Salim M, Porter R, Rubec C (2009) A summary of birds recorded in the marshes of southern Iraq, 2005–2008. In: Krupp F, Musselman LJ, Kotb MMA, Weidig I (Eds) Environment, Biodiversity and Conservation in the Middle East. Proceedings of the First Middle Eastern Biodiversity Congress, Aqaba, Jordan, 20–23 October 2008. BioRisk 3: 205–219. doi: 10.3897/biorisk.3.14 Abstract Th e marshlands of Lower Mesopotamia witnessed severe draining programs during late 1980s and early 2000s, which turned vast areas of the former water body into desert areas. New fi eld surveys of birds and their habitats in the marshes of southern Iraq were launched in 2005 through a national and international partnership of non-government organizations, ministries and donor agencies. Th is has resulted in the collection and collation of new data on the status, distribution and habitat requirements of birds and other biota in Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) in Iraq from 2005 to 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Warbler Library Special Collections
    Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Kentucky Warbler Library Special Collections 8-2007 Kentucky Warbler (Vol. 83, no. 3) Kentucky Library Research Collections Western Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ky_warbler Part of the Ornithology Commons Recommended Citation Kentucky Library Research Collections, "Kentucky Warbler (Vol. 83, no. 3)" (2007). Kentucky Warbler. Paper 333. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/ky_warbler/333 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Warbler by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Kentucky Warbler (Published by Kentucky Ornithological Society) VOL. 83 AUGUST 2007 NO. 3 IN THIS ISSUE POPULATION HEALTH AND DYNAMICS IN KENTUCKY’S LANDBIRDS: THE MONITORING AVIAN PRODUCTIVITY AND SURVIVORSHIP (MAPS) PROGRAM, Adam D. Smith and Shawchyi Vorisek.................................................. 63 PROJECT SOS (SAVE OUR SIALIA), Bob Peak and Judy Peak....................................... 67 SPRING SEASON 2007, Brainard Palmer-Ball, Jr., and Lee McNeely............................. 71 FIELD NOTE Neotropic Cormorant in Muhlenberg County.............................................................. 86 NEWS AND VIEWS........................................................................................................... 87 62 THE KENTUCKY WARBLER Vol. 83 THE KENTUCKY ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY President........................................................................................Mark
    [Show full text]
  • European Red List of Birds 2015
    Microcarbo pygmaeus (Pygmy Cormorant) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 4 Sources of reported national population data p. 7 Species factsheet bibliography p. 12 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Microcarbo pygmaeus (Pygmy Cormorant) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population
    [Show full text]
  • California Coastal National Monument, Literature Search And
    California Coastal National Monument Literature Search and Summarization of Key Biological Resources of the Monument Seabirds and Marine Mammals Prepared For: Bureau of Land Management California Coastal National Monument 299 Foam Street Monterey, CA 93940 Contact: Rick Hanks Prepared By: Mad River Biologists 1497 Central Avenue McKinleyville, CA 95519 David Fix, Biologist Heather Beeler, Biologist Ron LeValley, Senior Biologist Submitted: June 15, 2002 ____________________________________________ Table of Contents I. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 3 The Offshore Rocks .................................................................................................................... 3 Description of Habitat................................................................................................................. 3 General Management Considerations........................................................................................ 4 Fishing..................................................................................................................................... 4 Recreational Kayaking and Scuba Diving .............................................................................. 5 Seaweed collecting.................................................................................................................. 5 Management recommendations to reduce direct human disturbances ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Action Plan for the Conservation of the Pygmy Cormorant
    Work Package 3 - Transnational joint strategy and tools for the better management and implementation of Natura 2000 sites Activity 3.2 - Definition of Joint Transnational Action Plans for common habitats/group of habitats and species Joint Transnational Action Plan for the Pygmy Cormorant (Phalacrocorax pygmeus Pallas, 1773) Final version, 15 January 2013 Stefano Volponi Massimiliano Costa Partners Associated Partners Nimfea – Environment and Nature Development Agency Lake Balaton Development University of Klagenfurt Conservtion Association (LP) (HU) for South Epirus - Amvrakikos (GR) Coordination Agency (HU) – Department of Economics (AT) Province of Ravenna (IT) Strandja Nature Park Directorate (BG) Danube Delta National Institute Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve Consortium of Management Veneto Region - Commissions’ for Research and Development (RO) Authority (RO) of Torre Guaceto - Brindisi (IT) Coordination Project Unit (IT) Vienna University of Technology, Agricultural Research and Education Timis County Council (RO) Department of Public Finance Centre Raumberg-Gumpenstein (AT) and Infrastructure Policy (AT) Municipality of Cacak (RS) Introduction The Pygmy Cormorant Phalacrocorax pygmeus is a colonial waterbird that has a limited breeding range in the southeast of the Western-Palaearctic region. The species is poorly-known (Cramp & Simmons 1977, Jonhsgard 1993, Nelson 2006) and was considered for a long time vulnerable because suffered a large-scale decline since the second half of the 19th century due to drainage and degradation of wetlands, persecution by fishermen and destruction of breeding colonies (Cramp & Simmons 1977, Collar & Andrew 1988). The species was first classified by IUCN as globally threatened in the category Insufficiently Known (Groombridge 1993). Later, according to the new criteria developed by IUCN (Mace & Stuart 1994), it has been re-classified as near threatened (Collar et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Near Threatened Species NEAR THREATENED SPECIES
    Near Threatened species NEAR THREATENED SPECIES 2483 Threatened birds of Asia DWARF CASSOWARY Casuarius bennetti occurs in New Guinea (Papua, formerly Irian Jaya, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea) and, presumably as a long-established introduction, on New Britain, where it is a forest species occurring into the mountains and occasionally to the treeline at 3,600 m (Coates 1985, Beehler et al. 1986). Although probably tolerant of moderate habitat degradation, logging opens up previously inaccessible areas to hunters; despite heavy hunting pressure, it remains relatively common over a wide altitudinal range (Coates 1985, Beehler et al. 1986, B. M. Beehler in litt. 2000, A. Mack in litt. 1999). It is judged to have a substantial population and to be declining more slowly than the other larger and more lowland cassowaries Casuarius. Criteria nearly met: A1b,d; A2b,d. PYGMY CORMORANT Phalacrocorax pygmeus breeds in (all data for pairs, and unless otherwise indicated all information from Crivelli et al. 1996) Bulgaria (20–180), Greece (1,250– 1,310) (Kazantzidis and Nazirides 1999), Italy (30–50) (M. Passarella in litt. 1999), Moldova (30–500), Hungary, Romania (4,000–7,000), Turkey (1,000–1,500) (Eken and Magnin in press), Slovakia, Yugoslavia (1,000–1,200), F.Y.R.O. Macedonia, Croatia, Ukraine (20–320), Russia, Iran (20–30), Azerbaijan (14,749 estimated in 1986), Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzebekistan, plus, possibly, south-east Iraq, and it winters primarily in Albania, Greece, Yugoslavia, F.Y.R.O. Macedonia, Turkey, Cyprus, Iraq, Iran, Azerbaijan and also Israel, Bulgaria, Romania and Syria. There is one record from Pakistan (Grimmett et al.
    [Show full text]