PERSPECTIVES the MAGAZINE of the ASSOCIATION for JEWISH STUDIES in Memory of Jonathan M
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Christian Understandings of Proselytism David A
Christian Understandings of Proselytism David A. Kerr ike the chameleon, proselytism displays itself in many who had themselves been strangers (gerim) in Egypt (Deut. L shades of color. The word has different nuances in 10:19). The bulk of Talmudic literature welcomes the proselyte individual languages and among languages. Importantly from into the full fellowship of Israel, subject to the requirements of the point of view of this article, it is used variously among circumcision, baptism, and the offering of sacrifice. Jesus criti different sectors of the Christian church. It refers both to the cized what he deemed the Pharisaic tendency of making the transfer of allegiance from one religion to another and to the proselyte a slave to the law (Matt. 23:15). From this it may be transfer of allegiancebetweenchurches. Attitudes to proselytism inferred that the matter of how a proselyte should be incorpo are conditioned by political, social, and cultural considerations, rated into Israel was a matter of controversy in Jesus' time. New and responses vary from one church to another, from one culture Testament references to Jewish proselytes among the first Chris to another. I attempt here to clarify some of the issues, particu tians indicate that they were welcome members of the early larly as they have emerged in Christian thinking through the church (Acts 2:10; 6:5; 13:43).6 The postbiblical histories of both second half of the twentieth century. I argue tha t the hard-sought Judaism and Christianity continued to honor the proselyte until consensus that has emerged within the ecumenical movement more recent times, when, roughly speaking from the eighteenth needs to extend itself further to include new global realities of century, the term came to have the negative connotations we Christianity.1 have noted in English literary usage. -
Cosmology Timeline
Timeline Cosmology • 2nd Millennium BCEBC Mesopotamian cosmology has a flat,circular Earth enclosed in a cosmic Ocean • 12th century BCEC Rigveda has some cosmological hymns, most notably the Nasadiya Sukta • 6th century BCE Anaximander, the first (true) cosmologist - pre-Socratic philosopher from Miletus, Ionia - Nature ruled by natural laws - Apeiron (boundless, infinite, indefinite), that out of which the universe originates • 5th century BCE Plato - Timaeus - dialogue describing the creation of the Universe, - demiurg created the world on the basis of geometric forms (Platonic solids) • 4th century BCE Aristotle - proposes an Earth-centered universe in which the Earth is stationary and the cosmos, is finite in extent but infinite in time • 3rd century BCE Aristarchus of Samos - proposes a heliocentric (sun-centered) Universe, based on his conclusion/determination that the Sun is much larger than Earth - further support in 2nd century BCE by Seleucus of Seleucia • 3rd century BCE Archimedes - book The Sand Reckoner: diameter of cosmos � 2 lightyears - heliocentric Universe not possible • 3rd century BCE Apollonius of Perga - epicycle theory for lunar and planetary motions • 2nd century CE Ptolemaeus - Almagest/Syntaxis: culmination of ancient Graeco-Roman astronomy - Earth-centered Universe, with Sun, Moon and planets revolving on epicyclic orbits around Earth • 5th-13th century CE Aryabhata (India) and Al-Sijzi (Iran) propose that the Earth rotates around its axis. First empirical evidence for Earth’s rotation by Nasir al-Din al-Tusi. • 8th century CE Puranic Hindu cosmology, in which the Universe goes through repeated cycles of creation, destruction and rebirth, with each cycle lasting 4.32 billion years. • • 1543 Nicolaus Copernicus - publishes heliocentric universe in De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium - implicit introduction Copernican principle: Earth/Sun is not special • 1609-1632 Galileo Galilei - by means of (telescopic) observations, proves the validity of the heliocentric Universe. -
Annual Report Thursday, May 16, 2019
Annual Report Thursday, May 16, 2019 Table of Contents Opening Prayer ....................................................................................................................4 Agenda .................................................................................................................................4 Senior Rabbi’s Report .........................................................................................................5 President’s Report ............................................................................................................ 11 Treasurer’s Report and Budget ....................................................................................... 14 BHS New Heights Capital Campaign............................................................................... 17 Nominating Committee .................................................................................................... 18 General Donations ........................................................................................................... 19 Tribute Gifts ...................................................................................................................... 24 High Holy Days Schedule ................................................................................................. 28 Executive Director’s Report ............................................................................................. 29 Membership Commitments 2019-20 ............................................................................ -
Download the Full Edition
Meorot A Forum of Modern Orthodox Discourse (formerly Edah Journal) Marheshvan 5768 CONTENTS Editor’s Introduction to the Marheshvan 5768 Edition Eugene Korn ARTICLES Farteitcht un Farbessert (On “Correcting” Maimonides) Menachem Kellner Ethics and Warfare Revisited Gerald J. Blidstein Michael J. Broyde Women's Eligibility to Write Sifrei Torah Jen Taylor Friedman Dov Linzer Authority and Validity: Why Tanakh Requires Interpretation, and What Makes an Interpretation Legitimate? Moshe Sokolow REVIEW ESSAY Maimonides Contra Kabbalah: A Review of Maimonides’ Confrontation with Mysticism by Menachem Kellner James A. Diamond Meorot 6:2 Marheshvan 5768 A Publication of Yeshivat Chovevei Torah Rabbini cal School © 2007 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE t Meorot: A Forum of Modern Orthodox Discourse (formerly The Edah Journal) Statement of Purpose Meorot is a forum for discussion of Orthodox Judaism’s engagement with modernity, o published by Yeshivat Chovevei Torah Rabbinical School. It is the conviction of Meorot that this discourse is vital to nurturing the spiritual and religious experiences of Modern Orthodox Jews. Committed to the norms of halakhah and Torah, Meorot is dedicated to free inquiry and will be ever mindful that “Truth is the seal of the Holy One, Blessed be He.” r Editors Eugene Korn, Editor Nathaniel Helfgot, Associate Editor Joel Linsider, Text Editor o Editorial Board Dov Linzer (YCT Rabbinical School), Chair Michael Berger Moshe Halbertal (Israel) e Naftali Harcsztark Norma Baumel Joseph Simcha Krauss Barry Levy Adam Mintz Tamar Ross (Israel) A Forum of Modern Orthodox Discourse M Meorot will publish two online editions per year, and will be available periodically in hard- copy editions. -
Pandemic Passover 2.0 Answer to This Question
Food for homeless – page 2 Challah for survivors – page 3 Mikvah Shoshana never closed – page 8 Moving Rabbis – page 10 March 17, 2021 / Nisan 4, 5781 Volume 56, Issue 7 See Marking one year Passover of pandemic life Events March 16, 2020, marks the day that our schools and buildings closed last year, and our lives were and drastically changed by the reality of COVID-19 reaching Oregon. As Resources the soundtrack of the musical “Rent” put it: ~ pages Congregation Beth Israel clergy meet via Zoom using “525,600 minutes, how 6-7 CBI Passover Zoom backgrounds, a collection of which do you measure a year?” can be downloaded at bethisrael-pdx.org/passover. Living according to the Jewish calendar provides us with one Pandemic Passover 2.0 answer to this question. BY DEBORAH MOON who live far away. We measure our year by Passover will be the first major Congregation Shaarie Torah Exec- completing the full cycle Jewish holiday that will be celebrated utive Director Jemi Kostiner Mansfield of holidays and Jewish for the second time under pandemic noticed the same advantage: “Families rituals. Time and our restrictions. and friends from out of town can come need for our community Since Pesach is traditionally home- together on a virtual platform, people and these rituals haven’t stopped in this year, even based, it is perhaps the easiest Jewish who normally wouldn’t be around the though so many of our usual ways of marking these holiday to adapt to our new landscape. seder table.” holy moments have been interrupted. -
Acts 15 and the Jerusalem Council
Acts 15 and the Jerusalem Council Did they conclude the Torah was not for Gentiles? ------------------------------------------------- Tim Hegg • TorahResource © 2008 TorahResource • All rights reserved • (revised from 2001 edition) “Even the Apostles admitted the Torah was a burden no one could bear!” Such a statement characterizes a common sentiment about the Torah—one based upon an equally common inter- pretation of Acts 15 and the Jerusalem Council. But let us look again at Acts 15 and the decision of the Apostolic Council convened in Jerusalem. What was the issue at hand? What had brought about the need for the Council in the first place? And how should the decision of the Apostles be interpreted? What does all of this tell us about the place of the Torah among the early followers of Yeshua? The Core Issue at the Jerusalem Council The opening verses of Acts 15 give us a clear picture of the core issue around which the Jerusalem Council convened: And some men came down from Judea and began teaching the brethren, “Unless you are circum- cised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved.” And when Paul and Barnabas had great dissension and debate with them, the brethren determined that Paul and Barnabas and certain others of them should go up to Jerusalem to the apostles and elders concerning this issue.1 The “issue” at hand was whether or not someone who was not a Jew could be saved. To put it another way, how could a Gentile become a covenant member with Israel and share in the bless- ings of the covenant? The prevailing belief of the Judaisms in Paul’s day was that only Jews had a place in the world to come since God had made the covenant of blessing with Israel and no oth- er nation. -
Rereading Paul on Circumcision, Torah, and the Gentiles Asha K
A Seal of Faith: Rereading Paul on Circumcision, Torah, and the Gentiles Asha K. Moorthy Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 © 2014 Asha K. Moorthy All rights reserved ABSTRACT A Seal of Faith: Rereading Paul on Circumcision, Torah, and the Gentiles Asha K. Moorthy It is generally held that the Apostle Paul dismissed the rite of circumcision for Gentiles. This dissertation, however, offers a different perspective. Through examination of relevant sources regarding the role of circumcision in conversion along with consideration of Philo of Alexandria’s depiction of Abraham as an exemplar of and for the proselyte, this project will suggest that Paul, in Rom 4:11‐ 12, uses the example of Abraham in order to explain the value of circumcision for Jews as well as for Gentiles. It will be argued, moreover, that Paul’s objections to circumcision, as found in Romans as well as in Galatians, Philippians, and 1 Corinthians, were not to the rite per se but rather to the notion that circumcision was necessary for entering the Abrahamic covenant, “becoming a Jew,” justification, salvation, spiritual transformation, protection or identity in Christ. A case will be made, moreover, that in Paul’s day there were two competing forms of circumcision and that Paul was opposed to the more radical procedure. Finally, divergences in Paul’s handling of the topic of circumcision in different letters will be explained through attention to particular audience concerns. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1. -
The Transgender-Industrial Complex
The Transgender-Industrial Complex THE TRANSGENDER– INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX Scott Howard Antelope Hill Publishing Copyright © 2020 Scott Howard First printing 2020. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be copied, besides select portions for quotation, without the consent of its author. Cover art by sswifty Edited by Margaret Bauer The author can be contacted at [email protected] Twitter: @HottScottHoward The publisher can be contacted at Antelopehillpublishing.com Paperback ISBN: 978-1-953730-41-1 ebook ISBN: 978-1-953730-42-8 “It’s the rush that the cockroaches get at the end of the world.” -Every Time I Die, “Ebolarama” Contents Introduction 1. All My Friends Are Going Trans 2. The Gaslight Anthem 3. Sex (Education) as a Weapon 4. Drag Me to Hell 5. The She-Male Gaze 6. What’s Love Got to Do With It? 7. Climate of Queer 8. Transforming Our World 9. Case Studies: Ireland and South Africa 10. Networks and Frameworks 11. Boas Constrictor 12. The Emperor’s New Penis 13. TERF Wars 14. Case Study: Cruel Britannia 15. Men Are From Mars, Women Have a Penis 16. Transgender, Inc. 17. Gross Domestic Products 18. Trans America: World Police 19. 50 Shades of Gay, Starring the United Nations Conclusion Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Introduction “Men who get their periods are men. Men who get pregnant and give birth are men.” The official American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Twitter account November 19th, 2019 At this point, it is safe to say that we are through the looking glass. The volume at which all things “trans” -
CAMPUS UPDATE Tt fi Matt Dana Priest, Receives Counterterrorism Campaign.” the Prize Includes a $10,000 Pulitzer Prize Award
prisons and other controversial Another UCSC grad, features of the government’s CAMPUS UPDATE tt fi matt Dana Priest, receives counterterrorism campaign.” The prize includes a $10,000 Pulitzer Prize award. ana priest, who visited Priest is the fifth UCSC George Blumenthal named acting chancellor of UC Santa Cruz UC Santa Cruz in graduate to receive a Pulitzer, over that period of D March to accept the following Hector Tobar (1992), time. Acting Chancellor outlines his priorities Division of Social paul schraub paul “George is Sciences’ first respected through- On his fi rst day working in the Offi ce of the Chancellor in Distinguished jon kersey out the university, mid-July, George Blumenthal issued the following statement: Alumni Award, has and he has more even faculty members and 10 graduate teaching assistants received a 2006 than 30 years of who have demonstrated “exemplary and inspiring teaching” Pulitzer Prize. deep working Our primary mission as an institution is to serve the state Shave received top honors from UCSC’s Academic Senate. The Priest, who grad- knowledge of the of California through teaching, research, and public service. 2005–06 Excellence in Teaching Awards were presented by the late uated from UCSC Santa Cruz cam- Therefore, the priorities on which I will focus include: chancellor Denice D. Denton (fourth from right) and Committee on (Merrill College) in pus,” Dynes said. Teaching chair Charles McDowell (far left) at University Center at 1981 with a bache- Blumenthal, 60, R Recruiting and retaining the outstanding faculty, staff, and the end of the academic year. Also pictured are the faculty winners lor’s in politics, has been a mem- students that characterize our campus; (l–r): Ruth Hoffman, Kenneth Pedrotti, Hilde Schwartz, Ana Maria received journalism’s ber of the UCSC Seara, John Isbister, Dean Mathiowetz, and Martin Berger. -
Exclusion from the Sanctuary and the City of the Sanctuary in the Temple Scroll
EXCLUSION FROM THE SANCTUARY AND THE CITY OF THE SANCTUARY IN THE TEMPLE SCROLL by LA WREN CE H. SCHIFFMAN New York University, New York, N. Y. 10012 Introduction The discovery and publication of the Temple Scroll (Yadin, 1977, 1983; abbreviated below as 11 QT) opened new vistas for the study of the history of Jewish law in the Second Commonwealth period. Immedi ately after the Hebrew edition of the scroll appeared, debate ensued about whether this scroll was to be seen as an integral part of the corpus authored by the Qumran sect, or simply as a part of its library (cf. Schiffman, 1983a, 1985c). This question was, in turn, related to the problem of whether this text reflects generally held beliefs of most Second Temple Jews, or whether its laws and sacrificial procedures represented only the views of its author(s), who were demanding a thor oughgoing revision of the sacrificial worship of the Jerusalem Temple, or, finally, whether it reflected the author's eschatological hopes. This question is crucial in regard to the laws pertaining to various classes of individuals who were to be excluded from the Temple, its city (known in the Temple Scroll as cir hammiqdiis, "the city of the sanc tuary" or "Temple city") and the other cities of Israel because of various forms of ritual impurity or other disqualifications. The editor of the scroll, Yigael Yadin, maintained that it represented a point of view substantially stricter than that of the somewhat later tannaitic sources, and that the scroll extended all prohibitions of such impurity to the entire city of Jerusalem at least. -
College Council & Attachments
COLLEGE COUNCIL AGENDA & ATTACHMENTS MARCH 11, 2015 1 JOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE The City University of New York The College Council March 11, 2015 1:40 p.m. – 2:40 p.m. 9.64NB I. Adoption of the Agenda II. Minutes of the February 11, 2015 College Council (attachment A), Pg. 2 III. Proposals from the Undergraduate Curriculum and Academic Standards Committee (attachments B1-B2) – Associate Provost and Dean of Undergraduate Studies, Scott Stoddart New Courses B1. AFR 2XX (204) Religion, Terrorism and Violence in the Africana World (LP), Pg. 5 B2. SOC 2XX (243) Sociology of Sexualities, Pg. 18 IV. Proposal from the Interdisciplinary Studies Program (attachment C) – Professor Richard Haw C. Proposal to Form a Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, Pg. 33 V. New Business VI. Administrative Announcements – President Jeremy Travis VII. Announcements from the Faculty Senate – President Karen Kaplowitz VIII. Announcements from the Student Council – President Shereef Hassan 2 A JOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE The City University of New York MINUTES OF THE COLLEGE COUNCIL Wednesday, February 11, 2015 The College Council held its fifth meeting of the 2014-2015 academic year on Wednesday, February 11, 2015. The meeting was called to order at 1:50 p.m. and the following members were present: Barna Akkas, Schevaletta Alford, Warren Benton, Adam Berlin, Jane P. Bowers, Claudia Calirman, Anthony Carpi, James Cauthen, Katarzyna Celinska, Marsha Clowers, Angelique Corthals, Sylvia Dapia, Sandrine Dikambi, Artem Domashevskiy, Janice Dunham, -
Agenda Order Before Returning to Announcements; No Objection Was Voiced
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY • DAVIS • IRVINE • LOS ANGELES • MERCED • RIVERSIDE SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCISCO • SANTA BARBARA • SANTA CRUZ NOTICE OF MEETING REGULAR MEETING OF THE ASSEMBLY OF THE ACADEMIC SENATE Wednesday, May 28, 2003, 10 a.m.-4 p.m. Sunset Village, Covel Commons Grand Horizon Room (Salon A) 300 Deneve Drive University of California, Los Angeles (310) 825-7021 I. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS 1 II. MINUTES 2 Minutes of the Meeting of March 12, 2003 Appendix A: Assembly Attendance, March 12, 2003 14 III. ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE PRESIDENT 15 Richard C. Atkinson (Unable to attend. In his stead, Provost and Senior Vice President C. Judson King will participate.) IV. ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE CHAIR Gayle Binion 15 V. SPECIAL ORDERS (none) VI. REPORTS OF SPECIAL COMMITTEES 15 Report of the Senate’s Task Force on UC Merced Peter Berck, Chair Special meeting of the Assembly: Wednesday, July 20, 2003, UC Berkeley. Next regular meeting of the Assembly: Wednesday, October 29, 2003, UC Berkeley i VII. REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES A. Academic Council Gayle Binion, Chair 1. Nomination and Election of two at-large members to Universitywide Committee on Committees, 2003-2004 (action) 15 2. Assembly Meeting Schedule, 2003-2004 (information) 15 3. Apportionment of Representatives to the Assembly, 2003-2004 (information) 16 4. Proposed Amendments to Senate Bylaws (action) George Blumenthal, Chair, Ad Hoc Committee on Bylaw Revisions 17 5. Proposed Amendments to APM 015 – Faculty Student Relations (action) George Blumenthal, Member, Academic Council 49 6. Proposed Amendments to Academic Personnel Manual (APM) 010 – Academic Freedom (action) Robert Post, Professor of Law 54 7.