DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparative Electoral Management Toby James Provides an In-Depth Comparative Analysis of One of the Core Administrative Functions of Democracy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparative Electoral Management Toby James Provides an In-Depth Comparative Analysis of One of the Core Administrative Functions of Democracy “Elections matter for so many reasons – not least for an orderly transfer of power, and for citizens to reflect on, interact with, and directly affect their state institutions. The performance of electoral management bodies can make the difference between an election that is accepted with an orderly transition of power, or an election result that is challenged with ensuing problems of violence or societal instability. This ground-breaking study is the first to give election management the serious scholarly attention it rightly deserves. Toby James’ insights on organising elections will provide valuable evidence-based advice for policy makers and election practitioners alike.” – Therese Pearce Laanela, Head of Electoral Processes, International IDEA “In Comparative Electoral Management Toby James provides an in-depth comparative analysis of one of the core administrative functions of democracy. Rich in data and innovative conceptualisation, the book draws on insights from a variety of disciplines to address a topic, the urgency of which is rapidly becoming apparent to citizens the world over. The result is a highly informed and perceptive analysis of how elections are run and how they might be improved.” – Sarah Birch, King’s College London, UK “Toby James demonstrates very convincingly in this major book that electoral management matters a lot for the quality of elections and for how reliable election results are as a reflection of the electorate’s intentions. Comparative Electoral Management is, therefore, a book that will be of great value for at least three audiences: students of elections, electoral practitioners, and – hopefully – politicians interested in the improvement of the quality of elections and electoral administration in their country.” – Jørgen Elklit, Aarhus University, Denmark Comparative Electoral Management This book offers the first comparative monograph on the management of elections. The book defines electoral management as a new, inter-disciplinary area and advances a realist sociological approach to study it. A series of new, original frameworks are introduced, including the PROSeS framework, which can be used by academics and practitioners around the world to evaluate electoral management quality. A networked governance approach is also introduced to understand the full range of collaborative actors involved in delivering elections, including civil society and the international community. Finally, the book evaluates some of the policy instruments used to improve the integrity of elections, including voter registration reform, training and the funding of elections. Extensive mixed methods are used throughout including thematic analysis of interviews, (auto-) ethnography, comparative historical analysis and cross-national and national surveys of electoral officials. This text will be of key interest to scholars, students and practitioners interested and involved in electoral integrity and elections, and more broadly to comparative politics, public administration, international relations and democracy studies. Toby S. James is a Professor of Politics and Public Policy at the University of East Anglia, UK. Routledge Studies in Elections, Democracy and Autocracy Series editors: Pippa Norris Harvard University, USA, and the University of Sydney, Australia Carolien van Ham The University of New South Wales, Australia. This series addresses the quality of elections, how and why electoral contests fall short of international standards, and the implications of flawed elections for democracy and autocracy. The series is published in association with the Electoral Integrity Project. Election Administration and the Politics of Voter Access Kevin Pallister Electoral Rights in Europe Advances and Challenges Edited by Helen Hardman and Brice Dickson Electoral Integrity and Political Regimes Actors, Strategies and Consequences Edited by Holly Ann Garnett and Margarita Zavadskaya State Capacity, Economic Control, and Authoritarian Elections Merete Seeberg Comparative Electoral Management Performance, Networks and Instruments Toby S. James Comparative Electoral Management Performance, Networks and Instruments Toby S. James First published 2020 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2020 Toby S. James The right of Toby S. James to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. With the exception of Chapter 1 and Chapter 4, no part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Chapter 1 and Chapter 4 of this book are available for free in PDF format as Open Access from the individual product page at www.routledge.com. They have been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution- Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license. Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: James, Toby S., 1979– author. Title: Comparative electoral management : performance, networks, and instruments / Toby S. James. Description: Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020. | Series: Routledge studies in elections, democracy, and autocracy | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2019027849 (print) | LCCN 2019027850 (ebook) | ISBN 9781138682412 (hardback) | ISBN 9781315545172 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Elections—Management. | Elections—Corrupt practices. | Election monitoring. Classification: LCC JF1001 .J289 2020 (print) | LCC JF1001 (ebook) | DDC 324.6—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019027849 LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2019027850 ISBN: 978-1-138-68241-2 (hbk) ISBN: 978-1-315-54517-2 (ebk) Typeset in Times New Roman by Apex CoVantage, LLC Contents List of illustrations ix Preface and acknowledgements xii PART I Foundations 1 1 Introduction 3 2 A realist sociological approach 18 PART II Performance 31 3 Existing concepts and evidence 33 4 Evaluating electoral management performance: the PROSeS framework 59 PART III Networks 87 5 Electoral management governance networks 89 6 UK electoral management governance networks 104 7 Comparative electoral management governance networks 125 8 International electoral management governance networks 160 viii Contents PART IV Instruments 197 9 Voter registration reform 199 10 Centralisation 221 11 Training and human resource practices 241 12 Austerity and financial investment in electoral management 252 PART V Looking forward 267 13 Conclusions 269 Bibliography 275 Appendix: EMB budget sizes 307 Index 311 Illustrations Figures 1.1 The performance of electoral authorities in national elections held worldwide in between 2013–2017 and level of democracy 9 1.2 The performance of electoral authorities in national elections held worldwide in between 2013–2017 and GDP per capita 11 1.3 The performance of electoral authorities in national elections held worldwide in between 2013–2017 and region 12 1.4 An inter-disciplinary approach to electoral management 14 3.1 Structure and agency in assessing electoral management performance 35 3.2 The ‘fairness’ of electoral officials in 41 countries, 2010–2014 50 3.3 Global EMB capacity, as measured by V-DEM 8.0 51 4.1 The PROSeS framework 61 4.2 Completeness of the electoral register estimates around the world in 2017 68 4.3 Voter turnout at parliamentary general elections in the UK and Canada 77 4.4 Estimates of the completeness of the electoral register in the UK and Canada, 1945–2015 78 4.5 Percentage of votes cast that are invalid at general elections, 1945–2015 79 5.1 Percentage of the electoral cycle delivered by EMBs in the ELECT and EMS surveys 91 6.1 Three constellations of actors in the UK electoral management governance network 111 7.1 GDP per capita (current US$) 1960–2016 in the four case studies 126 7.2 Comparing the four case studies by the V-DEM Electoral Democracy Index 1900–2017 126 7.3 The frequency of interactions between EMBs and other actors (1–5, 5 is high) 157 7.4 The percentage of idea source for changing electoral law in the last five years 158 8.1 Frequency of appearances for each speaker 181 x Illustrations 9.1 The effects of IER on the completeness of the electoral register 211 9.2 The effects of IER on the costs of running electoral registration 214 9.3 The effect of IER on employee outcomes 216 11.1 The relationship between human resource management and EMB performance 245 12.1 Percentage increases in EMB budget from a non-election year to an election year 256 12.2 Changes in EMB budget size 2011–2016 258 13.1 The direct and indirect effects of electoral administration (and other) reforms 271 Tables 1.1 Foci of study within electoral studies 5 2.1 Three domains of reality in the realist sociological approach 26 3.1 Existing approaches to measuring electoral integrity and management quality 38 4.1 Type of electoral investments needed to ensure high-quality electoral management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Webroots-Democracy-Cost-Of-Voting
    1 forewords 3 - 8 executive summary 9 - 11 cost of existing elections 12 - 14 cost of online voting 15 - 19 impact of online voting on existing costs 20 - 23 policy roundtable 24 - 26 survey data 27 - 28 recommendations 29 - 31 appendix 32 - 35 2 3 Areeq Chowdhury If democracy was reborn tomorrow and we came vote following the introduction of online voting together to decide how our electoral system would fall by more than a quarter. should operate, would it look remotely the same as it does today? In an age where coins have been The cost of the current analogue system is more replaced by cash, cash has been replaced by than just money, however. The cost is thousands cards, and cards have been replaced by of voters overseas having their ballots contactless smartphone payments; would we undelivered, hundreds of thousands of voters replicate a voting system concocted in the 19th with disabilities being unable to cast an century? independent ballot, and millions of young people alienated from the political process. The added The idea that we would decide to create a system value of modernising elections is to have a based on spending millions and millions of pounds democratic system fit for the 21st century, true of taxpayers’ money on posting poll cards, hand- access for all voters with the capacity to further opening thousands of envelopes, and purchasing educate existing voters, and the potential to 300,000 pencils seems far-fetched to me. In a engage some of the 10m to 15m eligible voters digital era, in an innovative country like the UK, that do not currently vote.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy Unlock
    Unlock Democracy incorporating Charter 88 How healthy is our local democracy? Ros Scott years of Unlocking Democracy This pamphlet is based on a speech given by Ros Scott at Liberal Democrat Party Conference in 2008, at an Unlock Democracy lecture. Our lecture and pamphlet series are intended to provoke debate on and interest in issues relating to democracy and human rights. As an organisation promoting democratic reform and human rights, we may disagree with what our contributors say - but we are always stimulated by and grateful to them. The views of the authors of this work should not be presumed to be the opinion of Unlock Democracy or its staff. First published by Unlock Democracy in 2009. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial 2.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visit www. creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc/2.0/uk/ How healthy is our local democracy? Ros Scott1 Much of what really matters to us is on our doorstep. The condition of roads, the quality of local schools, the availability of leisure facilities like swimming pools and libraries, and whether or not our bins are emptied efficiently should be daily reminders about the state of our local democracy. And yet, it is all too rare to hear debate about the performance of the council, at least in anything other than a general sense, the choices which are available, or about the potential power of the ballot box to change things. Democracy, like charity, begins at home. If citizens feel disconnected from the democratic processes closest to home, then what hope is there for wider engagement? If government in all its forms can’t do anything about the dog dirt and paving slabs, how can anyone have confidence in its ability to deal with a global economic crisis, environmental degradation and threats to our security? After being closely involved with local government for almost 20 years, it is my belief that genuine local democracy in this country is in terminal decline.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of Unlock Democracy
    Unlock Democracy Constitution As amended at the Annual General Meetings held on 21 November 2009, 26 November 2011, 10 November 2012, 9 November 2013, 8 November 2014, 7 November 2015, 12 November 2016, 18 November 2017, 24 November 2018, and 23 November 2019. 1. Purpose Unlock Democracy argues and campaigns for a vibrant, inclusive democracy that puts power in the hands of the people. We seek a democratic participative process resulting in a written constitution that serves and protects the people. That constitution would define the roles of, and relationships between, the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary. It would determine how, and to what extent, power is shared between representatives at local, national and United Kingdom levels, and with international organisations. It would enshrine basic liberties and human rights for all. We campaign: • for fair and open elections; • for transparency in public decision making • to ensure that power is exercised as close to people as is practicable • to empower individuals and their communities to have a greater say over the decisions that affect them • for democratic accountability of all elected representatives, government and public bodies • for universal human rights for all. We promote: • a new culture of informed political interest and responsibility, paving the way for increased enthusiastic public participation • a pluralist democracy that is responsive to the problems and aspirations of all people, valuing and accommodating difference, diversity and universal human rights. Everyone has the right to live their life in dignity under the law, and free from fear. Unlock Democracy is a non-aligned organisation, committed to working inclusively across the political spectrum.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report October 2011–September 2013
    HOUSE OF LORDS APPOINTMENTS COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT October 2011 to September 2013 House of Lords Appointments Commission Page 3 Contents Section 1: The Appointments Commission 5 Section 2: Appointments of non-party-political peers 8 Section 3: Vetting party-political nominees 11 Annex A: Biographies of the Commission 14 Annex B: Individuals vetted by the Commission 16 and appointed to the House of Lords [Group photo] Page 4 Section 1 The Appointments Commission 1. In May 2000 the Prime Minister established the House of Lords Appointments Commission as an independent, advisory, non-departmental public body. Commission Membership 2. The Commission has seven members, including the Chairman. Three members represent the main political parties and ensure that the Commission has expert knowledge of the House of Lords. The other members, including the Chairman, are independent of government and political parties. The independent members were appointed in October 2008 by open competition, in accordance with the code of the Commissioner for Public Appointments. The party-political members are all members of the House of Lords and were nominated by the respective party leader in November 2010 for three year terms. 3. The terms of all members therefore come to an end in the autumn of 2013. 4. Biographies of the Commission members can be seen at Annex A. 5. The Commission is supported by a small secretariat at 1 Horse Guards Road, London SW1A 2HQ. Role of the House of Lords Appointments Commission 6. The role of the Commission is to: make recommendations for the appointment of non-party-political members of the House of Lords; and vet for propriety recommendations to the House of Lords, including those put forward by the political parties and Prime Minister.
    [Show full text]
  • Do We Need a Constitutional Convention for the UK?
    House of Commons Political and Constitutional Reform Committee Do we need a constitutional convention for the UK? Written Evidence Only those submissions written specifically for the Committee and accepted by the Committee as evidence for the inquiry are included. Ordered to be published 14, 21 and 28 June, 10 and 12 July, 6 September, 15, 18 and 30 October and 8 and 29 November 2012 1 List of written evidence Page 1 Canon Kenyon Wright CBE (CC 01, 01A) 3, 6 2 Professor Matthew Flinders (CC 02) 11 3 Constitution Society (CC 03) 14 4 Dr Claire Sutherland (CC 04) 20 5 Dr Alan Renwick (CC 05) 21 6 Graham Pearce and Sarah Ayres (CC 06) 23 7 Michael Gordon and Brian Thompson (CC 07) 29 8 Unlock Democracy (CC 08) 35 9 Democratic Audit (CC 09) 44 10 Professor Iain McLean (CC 10) 53 11 Rt Hon Carwyn Jones AM, First Minister of Wales (CC 11) 57 12 Andrew RT Davies, Leader of the Opposition & Welsh Conservative Assembly Group, Assembly Member for South Wales Central (CC 12) 62 13 Leanne Wood AM, Leader of Plaid Cymru and South Wales Central Assembly Member (CC 13) 65 14 Kirsty Williams AM, Leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats and Assembly Member for Brecon and Radnorshire (CC 14) 66 15 James Ware (CC 15) 70 16 Ruth Davidson MSP, Leader of the Scottish Conservatives (CC 16) 72 17 Professor James Mitchell (CC 21) 74 18 Law Society of Scotland (CC 17) 80 19 Sir Merrick Cockell, Chairman, Local Government Association (CC 18) 81 20 Esther A Roberton (CC 19) 83 21 SOLACE (CC 20) 86 22 Simon Cramp (CC 22) 89 23 Nicola Sturgeon MSP, Deputy First Minister, Scottish Parliament (CC 23) 90 24 Karen Ghose, Chief Executive, The Electoral Reform Society (CC 24) 92 25 Dr Robin Wilson (CC 25) 103 26 Nigel Smith, Director, Voxscot (CC 26) 105 27 Cabinet Office (CC 27) 106 28 Sir Edward Lister, Chief of Staff and Deputy Mayor for Policy and Planning (CC 28) 114 2 Written evidence submitted by Canon Kenyon Wright CBE (CC 01) SCOTLAND AND UK CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE “Our constitution is wearing out” Lord Hailsham 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy Matters: Lessons from the Citizens' Assembly on English
    Democracy Matters Lessons from the 2015 Citizens’ Assemblies on English Devolution Matthew Flinders | Katie Ghose | Will Jennings | Edward Molloy | Brenton Prosser | Alan Renwick | Graham Smith | Paolo Spada John Penrose MP Minister for Constitutional Reform Cabinet Office Whitehall London SW1 100 Dear John Over the past twelve months the Democracy Matters research team has been conducting a pilot project on the use of citizens’ assemblies to explore complex elements of constitutional policy- making in the United Kingdom. The focus has been on English regional decentralisation, as covered in the Cities and Local Government Devolution Act, and two citizens’ assemblies were convened in the North and South of England. It is with great pleasure that I now submit the final report on this valuable research and engagement project. I hope you and your officials will find its content and recommendations valuable in a number of different ways. Two main conclusions come from the research. First and foremost, there is an appetite amongst the public to engage in informed and constructive discussions about the future of British democracy and about specific policy proposals. The citizens’ assemblies in Southampton and Sheffield have demonstrated that individuals from a range of backgrounds can and are willing to work together to plan a common future and to understand future challenges. Second, the research suggests that the public are generally supportive of the principle of devolution within England. The pinch-point is the nature of the model of devolution on offer from the Government and the lack of public engagement in the decision-making process as it has so far been conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Think Tanks, Television News and Impartiality
    Journalism Studies ISSN: 1461-670X (Print) 1469-9699 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjos20 Think Tanks, Television News and Impartiality Justin Lewis & Stephen Cushion To cite this article: Justin Lewis & Stephen Cushion (2017): Think Tanks, Television News and Impartiality, Journalism Studies, DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2017.1389295 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1389295 © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 26 Oct 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 605 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rjos20 THINK TANKS, TELEVISION NEWS AND IMPARTIALITY The ideological balance of sources in BBC programming Justin Lewis and Stephen Cushion Is the use of think tanks ideologically balanced in BBC news and current affairs programming? This study answers this question empirically by establishing which think tanks are referenced in different BBC programming in 2009 and 2015, and then classifying them according to their ideological aims (either left, right, centrist or non-partisan). We draw on a sample size of over 30,000 BBC news and current affairs programmes in 2009 and 2015 to measure how often these think tanks were men- tioned or quoted. Overall, BBC news reveals a clear preference for non-partisan or centrist think tanks. However, when the Labour Party was in power in 2009, left and right-leaning think tanks received similar levels of coverage, but in 2015, when the Conservative Party was in government, right-leaning think tanks outnumbered left-leaning think tanks by around two to one.
    [Show full text]
  • Sony Music UK Acquires Ministry of Sound Recordings - New Deal with UK’S Leading Dance Label Expands Sony Music’S World-Class Portfolio
    August 10, 2016 Sony Corporation Sony Music UK Acquires Ministry of Sound Recordings - New deal with UK’s leading dance label expands Sony Music’s world-class portfolio - New York, August 10th, 2016 – Sony Music Entertainment UK Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Sony Corporation (“Sony”), made the announcement noted above. For further details, please refer to the attached press release. This transaction is not anticipated to have a material impact on Sony's consolidated financial results for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2017. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE London, 2016.08.10 SONY MUSIC UK ACQUIRES MINISTRY OF SOUND RECORDINGS New deal with UK’s leading dance label expands Sony Music’s world‐class portfolio Sony Music Entertainment UK Ltd. (“Sony Music UK”) today (08.10) announced that it has completed the acquisition of Ministry of Sound Recordings Ltd. (“Ministry of Sound Recordings”) As a result, Sony Music UK has acquired the label outright, including its artists, back catalogue and compilations business. The new relationship brings together one of the most successful UK independent labels with Sony Music, which has successfully introduced domestic acts including Mark Ronson, Paloma Faith, George Ezra and Calvin Harris across the world. Ministry of Sound Recordings was launched in 1993 as an extension of the pioneering South London nightclub founded by James Palumbo, now Lord Palumbo of Southwark. It is among the world’s largest dance music recording businesses, with cumulative album sales in excess of 70 million, including 40 UK No. 1 albums and 21 UK No. 1 singles. This acquisition will bring the Ministry of Sound brand fresh opportunities for growth, with the label’s core strength of dance music being enhanced by Sony Music’s outstanding international network.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report: the Africa Programme in 2020
    Annual The Africa Report Programme Africa Programme in 2020 December 2020 Chatham House, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, is a world-leading policy institute based in London. Our mission is to help governments and societies build a sustainably secure, prosperous and just world. For more information please contact Tighisti Amare, Assistant Director, Africa Programme, Chatham House T +44 (0)20 7957 5718 [email protected] | @AfricaProg www.chathamhouse.org/about/structure/africa-programme Contents Foreword 4 A century of supporting African engagement in international affairs 8 Africa’s foreign relations and agency in international affairs 10 Africa and the COVID-19 pandemic 15 Inclusive economic growth, governance and technology 18 Elections and political systems 24 Peace and security 29 Africa Programme reports 2020 34 Africa Programme speakers 2020 35 Africa Programme staff 44 Associate fellows 45 Africa Programme funders 46 Africa Programme partners 47 The Africa Programme in 2020 Foreword 2020 will be remembered for the COVID-19 pandemic. The risks of a devastating health crisis triggered an early response and coordination among African leaders, who also called for global cooperation to overcome the pandemic. Some countries, like South Africa and Rwanda, implemented tight lockdowns early on, while others like Tanzania downplayed the health risks and argued the economic impacts would be worse, allowing the virus to spread through the population. The Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) has confirmed over 2 million COVID-19 cases across the continent. Despite available data showing relatively higher numbers in South Africa, Ethiopia, and Kenya, Africa has so far been impacted less directly by COVID-19 than other regions, but the economic consequences are devastating.
    [Show full text]
  • Webroots-Democracy-Viral-Voting-2Nd
    1 forewords 3 - 8 executive summary 9 - 12 internet activity in the uk 13 - 20 culture change 21 - 23 twitter and clicktivism 24 - 28 previous uk pilots 29 - 31 global examples 32 - 34 benefits 35 - 43 recent developments 44 - 49 challenges 50 - 52 survey results 53 – 57 references 58 – 61 2 3 Areeq Chowdhury It is time for politics to fast-forward to the present The UK is a politically active nation online, and we and have online voting introduced. need to translate this passion to voting: the bedrock of our democracy. Analogue methods of This report is the work of over a year’s worth of politics will increasingly become incompatible research into the potential of online voting in the with the digital world of today. UK and I am delighted to share the results. Combined with effective marketing and WebRoots Democracy started as a result of integration with social media platforms, I am perceived youth apathy and low voter turnouts, confident that the introduction of an online however over the course of this research it is voting option will significantly increase voter evident that the appeal of online voting is much turnout in the UK. The estimate within this report wider. Online voting has the potential to is that online voting could boost youth voter enfranchise voters currently locked out of the turnout to 70%, up from 44% in the 2010 General current voting methods and will help future-proof Election. elections for an increasingly digital population in the UK. I urge all political parties to commit to introduce an online voting option in elections, as will-power One of the respondents to our survey summed up is the main stumbling block to progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2011 Democracy Involves the Right of the People Freely to Determine Their Own Destiny
    ANNUAL REPORT 2011 Democracy involves the right of the people freely to determine their own destiny. The exercise of this right requires a system that guarantees freedom of expression, belief and association, free and competitive elections, respect for the inalienable rights of individuals and minorities, free communications media, and the rule of law. — “Statement of Principles and Objectives,” 1984 ANNUAL REPORT 2011 Chairman’s Message | 2 President’s Message | 4 The Year at NED | 7 Fiscal 2011 Programs Africa | 10 Asia | 22 Central and Eastern Europe | 32 Eurasia | 42 Latin America and the Caribbean | 52 Middle East and North Africa | 60 Global | 70 World Movement for Democracy | 72 Center for International Media Assistance | 74 International Forum for Democratic Studies Democracy Rersource Center | 76 Overview | 77 Journal of Democracy | 78 Fellowship Programs | 80 International Forum for Democratic | 83 Studies Research Council 2011 Independent Auditors’ Report | 84 Board of Directors | 93 Officers and Directors | 93 From the Chairman t is difficult to look back on 2011 without concluding that it Ioffered more reasons to be optimistic than fearful. With the exception of 1989, no single year has presented as much vindication of NED’s mission or as much promise for our vision. The pro-democracy revolts of the Arab Spring not only broke the region’s au- thoritarian stronghold, but also generated fresh momentum for democratic change that could be felt as far away as China and Cuba. As the year ended, long repressed but newly engaged forces in Russia and Burma were pressing for democratic reform. Just two weeks into 2011, protests sparked by the self-im- veys show, the ferment was primarily caused by socioeco- molation of Tunisian street vendor Muhammad Bouazazi nomic grievances, by the popular demand for opportunity ousted the authoritarian regime of Zine El-Abidine Ben Ali — the chance to get a job, an education, to walk the streets after 23 years of repressive rule.
    [Show full text]
  • Secure Voting. a Guide to Secure Online Voting in Elections
    A guide to secure #onlinevoting in elections. Contents Forewords 3-9 Executive summary 10-14 Related areas of interest 15-26 Electoral Reform Services 27-32 Everyone Counts 33-36 Follow My Vote 37-41 Dr Kevin Curran 42-48 Mi-Voice 49-52 Professor Robert Krimmer 53-56 Scytl 57-71 Smartmatic 72-81 Verizon 82-89 Conclusion 90-93 Glossary 94-99 References 100-101 Secure Voting: A guide to secure #onlinevoting in elections. 2 Forewords Areeq Chowdhury Rt Hon John Bercow MP Chloe Smith MP Graham Allen MP Hannah Bardell MP Rt Hon Tom Brake MP “ The Government said they wanted assurances of online voting being ‘robust and really hard to hack’ – I believe this “ report provides those assurances. Secure Voting: A guide to secure #onlinevoting in elections. 3 Forewords Areeq Chowdhury One of the major challenges I’ve come across since starting this campaign has been to provide reassurances that modernising our voting system would not make it less secure. In October last year, the Government said they wanted assurances of online voting being “robust and really hard to hack” – I believe this report provides those assurances. Secure Voting draws upon decades of experience in secure online voting from leading academics and global providers of online and electronic voting. If you were to seek advice on how to make a car or a boat, you would seek it from those who have years of experience in successfully making cars and boats. This is the approach I have sought when putting together this report. This report does not shy away from the security challenges of online voting, but addresses them head on.
    [Show full text]