Harney-Maiheur Lakes Sub-Basin Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Harney-Maiheur Lakes Sub-Basin Assessment Harney-Maiheur Lakes Sub-Basin Assessment Harney County Watershed Council 450 N. Buena Vista Burns, OR 97720 (541) 573-8199 June 2001 This project was funded in part by the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board Produced by bavid Vickstrom and Lynn A. Sirrine A S I Section One Introduction 1 Sub-basin Description 1 Map #1 - Harney-Malheur Lakes Sub-basin Vicinity Map 2 Map #2 - Harney-Malheur Lakes Sub-basin Hydrologic Units Level Five 3 Map #3 Ownership Key 4 Map #3 - Harney-Malheur Lakes Sub-basin Base Map 5 Section Two History of the Harney-Maiheur Lakes Sub-basin 6 Climate 8 Table #1 - Burns, OR Monthly Climate and Precipitation Averages 10 Table #2- Voltage, OR Monthly Climate and Precipitation Averages 11 Geology 12 Hydrology 13 Graph #1- Maiheur Lake Peak Annual Elevation, 1938-2000 15 Table #3- Malheur Lake Peak Annual Elevations 16 Table #4- Elevatjon/\/olume Surface Area Table for Malheur Lake and Harney-Mud Lakes 17 Map #4- Harney-Malheur Lakes Sub-basin Lake Levels 18 Ground Water 21 Surface Water 21 Water Supply 22 Graph #2- Historical Streamfiow Daily Values Graph for Rock Creek 23 Graph #3 - Historical Streamfiow Daily Values Graph for Donner und Blitzen River 24 Graph #4- Historical Streamflow Daily Values Graph for Maiheur Lake Outlet at Narrows 25 Section Three Human Uses 26 Wildlife 28 Map #5 Principal Spring Duck and Goose Use Areas, 1975-1 978 30 Map #6 Principal Spring/Fall Swan Use Areas, 1975-1978 31 Map #7 Principal Duck and Goose Nesting Areas, 1975-1978 32 Map #8 Principal Fall Duck and Goose Use Areas, 1975-1 978 33 Map #9 Principal Shorebird Use Areas, 1975-1978 34 Map #10- Principal Long-Billed Curlew Use Areas, 1975-1978 35 Map #11- Principal Long-Legged Wader Use Areas, 1975-1 978 36 Map #12- Principal Spring/Fall Marshbird Use Areas, 1975-1978 37 Map #13 - Principal Raptor Use Areas, 1975-1978 38 Table #5- Threatened, Endangered or Sensitive Mammals 40 Fish 40 Harney-Maiheur Lakes Sub-Basin Assessment A a a Map #14 - Harney-Malheur Lakes Sub-basin Redband Trout 42 Table #6- Threatened, Endangered or Sensitive Fish 43 Vegetation 43 Table #7 - Low Elevation Lake Basins and Valleys 43 Map #15 - Harney-Malheur Lakes Sub-basin Historic Plant Associations 51 Map #16 - Current Vegetation- General Plant Communities 52 Table #8- Threatened, Endangered or Sensititve Plant Species 53 Soils 53 Table #9-- Warm Soils on Terraces, Low Hills and Basin Floors 53 Map #17- Harney-Maiheur Lakes Sub-basin General Soils 60 Proper Functioning Condition 61 Water Quality Limited Streams 61 Map #18- Harney-Malheur Lakes Sub-basin Riparian Condition 63 Map #19- Harney-Malheur Lakes Sub-basin 303D Listed Streams 64 Section Four Issues and Recommendations 65 Appendices Appendix A 67 Mammals 67 Birds 68 Reptiles and Amphibians 77 Appendix B 78 Appendix C 79 Native Fish 79 Non-Native Fish 79 Appendix D 80 Harney County Noxious Weeds 80 Appendix E 82 Appendix F 83 Glossary Glossary 85 References References 87 Harney-Maiheur Lakes Sub-Basin Assessment II SECTION ONE INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to provide a basis for future watershed management plans. The Harney-Maiheur Lakes Sub-basin Assessment will serve as a planning tool for the Harney Watershed Council (HCWC) and others. This assessment was developed as an agreed upon action with the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB) as outlined in a grant to the HCWC. The Council enjoys the active involvement of the following entities: private landowners, Oregon Water Resources Department, Harney County Court, USD1 Bureau of Land Management, Burns Paiute Tribe, OWEB, USDA Forest Service, lzaak Walton League, Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, USDA Farm Service Agency, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Harney Soil and Water Conservation District, Oregon State University, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA Agriculture Research Service and the Malheur Lake Basin Working Group. The purpose of the Harney County Watershed Council is to address issues and concerns about watershed health in Harney County and to promote existing good and beneficial conditions. The Council will provide a framework for education, coordination, and cooperation among all interested parties for the development and implementation of watershed action plans beneficial to the people and the environment. The Council recognizes that local economic and ecological prosperity is dependant upon the current and future availability and quality of water; therefore, the Harney County Watershed Council is committed to this three-part goal: Determine the health of individual watersheds or watershed segments. Retain the health of high quality watersheds. Restore and enhance those watersheds, or portions thereof, that can be improved. SUB-BASIN DESCRIPTION The Harney-Malheur Lakes Sub-basin is located in north central Harney County, Oregon (Map 1). The sub-basin is 894,061acres in size and stretches to approximately 65 miles long and 40 miles across at the widest portion in the Harney-Maiheur Lakes area. Harney-Maiheur Lakes Sub-basin(4t1field USGS Hydrologic Unit Code) is contained in the Malheur Lake Basin (31d field HUC) and is designated by (HUC). #17120001. This sub-basin is comprised of 12 watersheds (5th field HUC)as #1712000101 --#1712000112. (Bureau of Land Management Ecological Site Index), Map2. Harney-Maiheur Lakes Sub-Basin Assessment I III RiI,cBurns_. Wagontirek Diam nd Frenchgle1n 1 Fields' 1 MAP #1 HARNEY-MALHEURLAKES SUBBASIN VICINITY MAP HARNEY COUNTY GIS In cooperation with The BuTeau of Land Management Sca'e: 1 inch = 56.8 miles Burns District Office; Burns. Oregon Date: 2OMAR-2OO1, Pam Kelfer,vicinityllx8.a,nl/harmaMc.ps I S S i'20S R2 .MS F R3 Q16 R.".:Th a '-S 4fiItrRt. S1S1t*K INL('REEKt It I $ _. T2ISR2 J7 IS R31 i'2 I S 'C, %1 S I I S '5 t qREat 'cnNKm&WAmR "S R28E T.. 22S4!E T22S I R34E R35F S I I LU 4. L T23S R2cEI I23S I R30E O12.,R35 ii? S IS -i--. 'SLIltI TS R2SI) 124 3OE T24S I I ÀY '5 LVIESR.WEK CR T25S R 4E itReweo,r ' ide. CreekRes .5 \IJ k CA 34E RAVFJsOtEEK a_a_ I T27S R2cE 33E T27SL5\ S - S R3OF. r2 l<,s4E Weed Ldlv T2QS R35E. R2).5E T2 S S S S ANAL SW4 a 00 i3O '5 1jiv 4S R2E ji i .us R29E OS R29.5E T3OS R3.. 3QR35E 1. J'.CLS.SSOr --S SM1t{(REE S .5 S S C 4 EYCR .5 RUNDLXVLENR SI I T3 I. US R32.5E T3I',IO9I1b4% T3IS9IT i-Ii4Lk tNtLk oo03 :S I S S AL I '5 r'4 00 S yu. S ('B * S R.l)E I SR3!E i2.5E T32S R32.75F 32. k!3 I MAP #2- HARNEY-MALHEUR LAKES SUBBASIN - HYDROLOGIC UNITS LEVEL FIVE Harney-Maiheur Lakes 0 1 2 3 45 6 MILES Subbasin (HUG 4): Scale: 1 inch = 5.6 miles 17120001 Watersheds (HUC 5): '5' 01,02,03,04,05,06 07,08,09,10,11,12 Note: No warranty is made by Harney County or the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use with other data. Original data was compiled from various HARNEY COUNTY 018 sources. This information may not meet National Map Accuracy In cooperation with Standards. This product was devaloped through digital means The Bureau of Land Management and may be uptated witt,out notification. Burne Diatrict Office; Burna, Oregon Date: 21-MAR-2001.Pam Keller. subbaainllxll.aml/harmalhuc5.ps S OWNERSHIP % OF TOTAL ACRES (Map #3) ACREAGE Private Lands 364,496 40.8% Public Lands Managed by: U.S. Bureau of Land Management 357,987 40.0% U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 101,555 11.4% USDA Forest Service 47,429 5.3% State of Oregon 11,961 1.3% Indian Lands 10,633 1.2% Harney-Maiheur Lakes Sub-Basin Assessment 4 c 2tT2 )S R33E R34.5E' r SR28 T2OS R2 T2OS R3OE J)S R3 I E '1205 R32E oIiEIWS R34 I'2OS R$5E Rn LOCK WEST RINK VINE CREEK irrILE DOYCR B n, T2IS R2 JS R' .5E T2ISR33E Ci-. V,ILS4) ('K 'I'22S R 12S322SE T22S RI R34E OtXIrC.NYON ucitianan T23SR28E T23S R29 R3UE 33' C LTrl,E S Lrnl.E( CR (B T24S R28E I24 3UE T24S T24SR35; t T- Pomo,o LA Frgnk Schr.tidt a II.VER.WFK Vs(.,,EChginLk AIhe,Lk (R T25S R 31E 35E N kepervou' (BA T2ÔS T2ÔS R2)E T2SA R3OE VERCRELK New Princeto T27S F35E S R28E 'I'2IS T28S RVE A*29E T29S R3 T29S R35E Twu, Lakn iamon Mnd,W+--rsdim Lk US R2SE T3OS R32 3QR35E I31)S R29EM'Y N K ,igmboRne,'vor SMVflI (BEE VMBOCR EYKR c Pk tNDJrIEN R Hid.kn 8E T3IS R29E T3ISR3OE T31S 31S R32.5 1'3 IS R32.75E T3 IS 'ShI4o!LA L4.tLk .EK8 SINOCR Mt. CR WSLIaLL N T32S R29E l'32S R3OE S R3 I E T3 ' ,, T32S R32.75E 32. R33 MAP #3- HARNEY-MALHEUR LAKES SUBBASIN - BASE MAP .1.1-I-.--- 0 1 2 345 6 Private Lands - 364,496 acres Subbasin Boundary Total Stream Miles in Subbasin: 1162.8 MILES Total Perennial Miles: 177.5 Scale: 1 inch = 5.6 miles BLM Lands - 357,987 acres Major Roads State Lands - 11,961 acres Perennial Streams Indian Lands - 10,633 acres Intermittent Streams Note: No warranty is made tw Harney County or the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use USFS Lands 47,429 acres with other data.
Recommended publications
  • Forests of Eastern Oregon: an Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann
    Forests of Eastern Oregon: An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann United States Forest Pacific Northwest General Tecnical Report Department of Service Research Station PNW-GTR-578 Agriculture April 2003 Revised 2004 Joseph area, eastern Oregon. Photo by Tom Iraci Authors Sally Campbell is a biological scientist, Dave Azuma is a research forester, and Dale Weyermann is geographic information system manager, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 620 SW Main, Portland, OR 97205. Cover: Aspen, Umatilla National Forest. Photo by Tom Iraci Forests of Eastern Oregon: An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, OR April 2003 State Forester’s Welcome Dear Reader: The Oregon Department of Forestry and the USDA Forest Service invite you to read this overview of eastern Oregon forests, which provides highlights from recent forest inventories.This publication has been made possible by the USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) Program, with support from the Oregon Department of Forestry. This report was developed from data gathered by the FIA in eastern Oregon’s forests in 1998 and 1999, and has been supplemented by inventories from Oregon’s national forests between 1993 and 1996.This report and other analyses of FIA inventory data will be extremely useful as we evaluate fire management strategies, opportunities for improving rural economies, and other elements of forest management in eastern Oregon.We greatly appreciate FIA’s willingness to work with the researchers, analysts, policymakers, and the general public to collect, analyze, and distrib- ute information about Oregon’s forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)
    i ,' o () (\ ô OnBcox HrsroRrc Tnans Rpponr ô o o o. o o o o (--) -,J arJ-- ö o {" , ã. |¡ t I o t o I I r- L L L L L (- Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council L , May,I998 U (- Compiled by Karen Bassett, Jim Renner, and Joyce White. Copyright @ 1998 Oregon Trails Coordinating Council Salem, Oregon All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon's Historic Trails 7 Oregon's National Historic Trails 11 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail I3 Oregon National Historic Trail. 27 Applegate National Historic Trail .41 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .63 Oregon's Historic Trails 75 Klamath Trail, 19th Century 17 Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 81 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, t83211834 99 Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1 833/1 834 .. 115 Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 .. t29 V/hitman Mission Route, 184l-1847 . .. t4t Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 .. 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 .. 183 Meek Cutoff, 1845 .. 199 Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 General recommendations . 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 241 Lewis & Clark OREGON National Historic Trail, 1804-1806 I I t . .....¡.. ,r la RivaÌ ï L (t ¡ ...--."f Pðiräldton r,i " 'f Route description I (_-- tt |".
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Harney Basin Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan
    Greater Harney Basin Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan January 2020 Developed by the Oregon Department of Agriculture and the Greater Harney Basin Local Advisory Committee with support from the Harney Soil and Water Conservation District Oregon Department of Agriculture Harney SWCD Water Quality Program 530 Highway 20 South 635 Capitol St. NE Hines, OR 97738 Salem, OR 97301 Phone: (541) 573-5010 Phone: (503) 986-4700 Website: oda.direct/AgWQPlans (This page is blank) Table of Contents Acronyms and Terms .................................................................................................................................... i Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................ iii Required Elements of Area Plans ......................................................................................................... iii Plan Content.................................................................................................................................................. iii Chapter 1: Agricultural Water Quality Program ........................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of Agricultural Water Quality Program and Applicability of Area Plans...... 1 1.2 History of the Ag Water Quality Program .............................................................................. 1 1.3 Roles and Responsibilities ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Timing of In-Water Work to Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources
    OREGON GUIDELINES FOR TIMING OF IN-WATER WORK TO PROTECT FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES June, 2008 Purpose of Guidelines - The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, (ODFW), “The guidelines are to assist under its authority to manage Oregon’s fish and wildlife resources has updated the following guidelines for timing of in-water work. The guidelines are to assist the the public in minimizing public in minimizing potential impacts to important fish, wildlife and habitat potential impacts...”. resources. Developing the Guidelines - The guidelines are based on ODFW district fish “The guidelines are based biologists’ recommendations. Primary considerations were given to important fish species including anadromous and other game fish and threatened, endangered, or on ODFW district fish sensitive species (coded list of species included in the guidelines). Time periods were biologists’ established to avoid the vulnerable life stages of these fish including migration, recommendations”. spawning and rearing. The preferred work period applies to the listed streams, unlisted upstream tributaries, and associated reservoirs and lakes. Using the Guidelines - These guidelines provide the public a way of planning in-water “These guidelines provide work during periods of time that would have the least impact on important fish, wildlife, and habitat resources. ODFW will use the guidelines as a basis for the public a way of planning commenting on planning and regulatory processes. There are some circumstances where in-water work during it may be appropriate to perform in-water work outside of the preferred work period periods of time that would indicated in the guidelines. ODFW, on a project by project basis, may consider variations in climate, location, and category of work that would allow more specific have the least impact on in-water work timing recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Harney County Way Collaborative Summit May 2 – 3, 2018 | Lincoln Building Auditorium, Burns, OR
    The Harney County Way Collaborative Summit May 2 – 3, 2018 | Lincoln Building Auditorium, Burns, OR The Harney County Way Collaborative Summit 2018 Linking Collaboration Efforts to Build a Best Harney County High Desert Partnership’s Mission Summit Vision The High Desert Partnership exists to cultivate collaboration and We believe this summit will provide a productive time for those support and strengthen diverse partners engaged in solving participating in collaborative work in Harney County to network, complex issues to advance healthy ecosystems, economic well- learn and look for opportunities to work together. Bringing together being and social vitality to ensure a thriving and resilient the collaborative initiatives will create synergy and the story of community. collaboration will reverberate in our community. The outcomes from this summit will lead to more resilient communities. Our Core Values o We believe in our collaborative process to address societal Goals of the Summit issues. o Increase the understanding of collaborative efforts in Harney o We believe in doing things right rather than right now. County. o We believe in recognizing the values of others. o Understand the links where initiatives can work together on o We believe in advocating for the process, not for outcomes. projects or programs. o We believe in taking a holistic approach: social, ecological and o Find the places for sharing resources. economic. o Grow the community's collaborative participation. o We believe that optimism is necessary to successfully address o Provide a venue for those in attendance to gain a better the challenges we face. understanding of the work of High Desert Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Ecoregions of Idaho
    1 0 . C o l u m b i a P l a t e a u 1 3 . C e n t r a l B a s i n a n d R a n g e Ecoregion 10 is an arid grassland and sagebrush steppe that is surrounded by moister, predominantly forested, mountainous ecoregions. It is Ecoregion 13 is internally-drained and composed of north-trending, fault-block ranges and intervening, drier basins. It is vast and includes parts underlain by thick basalt. In the east, where precipitation is greater, deep loess soils have been extensively cultivated for wheat. of Nevada, Utah, California, and Idaho. In Idaho, sagebrush grassland, saltbush–greasewood, mountain brush, and woodland occur; forests are absent unlike in the cooler, wetter, more rugged Ecoregion 19. Grazing is widespread. Cropland is less common than in Ecoregions 12 and 80. Ecoregions of Idaho The unforested hills and plateaus of the Dissected Loess Uplands ecoregion are cut by the canyons of Ecoregion 10l and are disjunct. 10f Pure grasslands dominate lower elevations. Mountain brush grows on higher, moister sites. Grazing and farming have eliminated The arid Shadscale-Dominated Saline Basins ecoregion is nearly flat, internally-drained, and has light-colored alkaline soils that are Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and America into 15 ecological regions. Level II divides the continent into 52 regions Literature Cited: much of the original plant cover. Nevertheless, Ecoregion 10f is not as suited to farming as Ecoregions 10h and 10j because it has thinner soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology of Malheur Lake, Harney County, Southeastern Oregon J, ./J V
    (200) WRi 7.3>-- ;:). , 3 1818 00029855 Hydrology of Malheur Lake, Harney County, southeastern Oregon J, ./J v- . S. GEOLOGI AL SURV EY / Water esOi:ifceTn vest iga tlo ns 2 1-75 • EP 2 3 1975 Prepared in cooperation with U. S. ARMY CORPS OF E GT EERS, Wall a Wall a Distri ct BI6LIOGR.I.PHIC DATA 11. Report No. 3. Re cipient' Accession No. SHEET 4. Title a nd Subtitle 5. Report Date HYDROLOG Y OF MALHEUR LAKE, HARNEY COUNTY, SOUTHEASTERN August 1975 OREGON 6. 7. Au thor(s ) 8. Performing Organization Rept. Larr y L. Hubbard o. USGS/WRI -21-7 5 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/ Task/ Work Unit No. U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division 830 NE. Holladay Street 11. Contra ct/ Grant No . Portland, Oregon 97232 12. Sponsoring Organization Name a nd Address 13. Type of Report & Period U.S . Geological Survey, Water Resources Division Covered 830 NE . Holladay Street Final Portland, Oregon 97232 14. 15. Supplementary orcs Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla Distr ict 16. Ab rracrs The various components of inflow and outf low to and from the lake and their relative magnitudes were identified. In 1972 water year the total inf low to the lake was 200,000 acre - feet, but it was only 75 ,000 acre-feet in 1973 water year. In 1972 wa ter year the Donner und Blitzen River contr ibuted 55 percent of the inflow, with Silvies River , direct prec i pitation, and Sodhous e Spring contributing 28, 13, and 4 percent respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Diamond Craters Oregon's Geologic
    Text by Ellen M. Benedict, 1985 Features at stops correspond to points on a clock ago, a huge mass of hot gases, volcanic ashes, bits face. Imagine that you are standing in the middle of a of pumice and other pyroclastics (fire-broken rock) Travel And Hiking Hints clock face. Twelve o’clock is the road in front of you violently erupted. The blast – greater than the May and 6 o’clock the road behind. If you always align the 18, 1980, eruption of Mt. St. Helens – deposited a Diamond Craters is located in the high desert country clock face with the road, you should be able to locate layer of pyroclastics 30 to 130 feet thick over an area about 55 miles southeast of Burns, Oregon. It’s an the features. almost 7,000 square miles! isolated place and some precautions should be taken . when traveling in the area. Start Tour. Mileage begins halfway Pyroclastics are between milepost 40 and 41 on State normal behavior Diamond Craters has no tourist facilities. The nearest Highway 205 at the junction to Diamond. for magmas place where gasoline is sold is at Frenchglen. Turn left. (subsurface That’s the opinion held by scores of molten rocks) Keep your scientists and educators who have visited Diamond, Oregon, a small ranching community, was of rhyolitic (a vehicle on named in 1874 for Mace McCoy’s Diamond brand. volcanic material and studied the area. It has the “best and hard-packed The nearby craters soon became known as Diamond related to granite) most diverse basaltic volcanic features in the road surfaces Craters.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent and Contemporary Foraging Practices of the Harney Valley Paiute
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1-1-1978 Recent and contemporary foraging practices of the Harney Valley Paiute Marilyn Dunlap Couture Portland State University Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Native American Studies Commons, and the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Couture, Marilyn Dunlap, "Recent and contemporary foraging practices of the Harney Valley Paiute" (1978). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 480. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RECENT AND CONTEMPORARY FORAGING PRACTICES OF THE HARNEY VALLEY PAIUTE by MARILYN DUNLAP COUTURE A thesis suoolitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in ANTHROPOLOGY Portland State University @ r1arilyn Dunl ap Couture 1978 TO THE OFFICE OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH: The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Marilyn Dunlap Couture presented 27 January 1978. Wayne Sut~les, Chairman Thomas M. Newman Byron ~ppert Daniel J. Scheans, He Sta udies and Research AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Marilyn Dunlap Couture for the Master of Arts in Anthropology presented 27 January 1978, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon. Title: Recent and Contemporary Foraging Practices of the Harney Valley Paiute. Native plants still play an important part in the lives of some American Indians. This thesis describes recent foraging practices which persist among the Harney Valley Paiute, a group of Northern Paiute Indians which formerly occupied all of Harney Valley in southeastern Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • South End Complex Basque Wells & Craters Fires C
    SSSOOOUUUTTTHHH EEENNNDDD CCCOOOMMMPPPLLLEEEXXX & BASQUE WELLS & CRATERS FIRES BURNED AREA EMERGENCY STABILIZATION PLAN Bureau of Land Management Burns District Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Malheur National Wildlife Refuge August – September 2006 Prepared1 by U.S. Department of the Interior Burned Area Emergency Response Team BURNED AREA EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN South End Complex & Basque Wells & Craters Fires EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This plan addresses emergency stabilization of fire effects resulting from the South End Complex and Basque Wells and Craters Fires that occurred on the Bureau of Land Management, Burns District and Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. The South End Complex includes the Krumbo Butte, Grandad, Pueblo, Trout Creek, and Black Point Fires. The plan has been prepared in accordance with the U.S. Department of the Interior, Department Manual, Part 620: Wildland Fire Management, Chapter 3: Burned Area Emergency Stabilization and Rehabilitation (September, 2003) the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Emergency Stabilization and Rehabilitation, H-1742-1, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Fire Management Handbook, Chapter 11. The plan also includes recommendations for inter mixed private lands within the burned area. The primary objectives of this Burned Area Emergency Response Plan are: Human Life and Safety • To prescribe post-fire mitigation measures necessary to protect human life and property Soil/Water Stabilization • To promptly stabilize and prevent further degradation to affected watersheds and soils Threatened
    [Show full text]
  • Constituent Power from Cultural Practice: Implications from the Malheur Wildlife Refuge Occupation
    Constituent Power from Cultural Practice: Implications from the Malheur Wildlife Refuge Occupation Juho Turpeinen Introduction I present here a defence of the people as the subject of constituent power, a case against ardently utopian thinking.1 The conjunctures in which bounded political entities are constituted are messy and problematic, but not hopeless or dystopian. This is to say, oppressive power relations are not always only oppressive, but should be viewed in context. The armed occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, which took place in Oregon in 2016, makes for an illustrative case study of political identity formation, the foundation of a political regime rooted in popular rule.2 How are such identities, the discursively constructed subject positions of democracy, possible in the first place? What allows for them to be called democratic? What role does land play in this process? Adopting the cultural studies ethos of studying not only meaning, but how meaning is produced, I approach the question of the people as the subject of constituent power by arguing for an interpretation of sovereignty as cultural practices of meaning- making, as discursive struggles over cultural meaning that challenge and are challenged by relations of power. Sovereignty as cultural practice gives us a framework for understanding these processes of identity formation on three related and synchronous levels of politics. This approach should not be confused with ‘cultural sovereignty’, whether defined as a kind of bundle of intellectual property rights protective of indigenous cultures,3 or as a normative political project that posits the right to define ‘sovereignty’ from within indigenous cultures, and in which tradition is to form the foundation of group identity and political action.4 I do, however, share with this latter conceptualisation an effort to reconsider the relationships between law, politics, and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Malheur National Wildlife Refuge
    Implementation Progress Update 2021 This document is an implementation summary of the Collaborative Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) between January 2013 and September of 2018. During this period significant effort was directed towards improving ecological function of aquatic systems, the highest CCP priority. Efforts were focused on Malheur Lake based on collaborative conversations and intercontinental importance to migratory birds. Resulting from extensive interactions it became clear Malheur Lake is both unique and a poorly understood ecosystem. With this as the bases to start from and through testing possible monitoring/ management techniques, it became clear a strategic ecological system approach was required. This resulted in beginning the development of a Malheur Lake systems model that would enable transfer of knowledge through time and test/inform future management decisions. Resources were also directed towards social and economic analysis to strengthen future management decisions and develop implementation resources. The other major component of improving Refuge aquatic health was development of an integrated wetland/river plan. Advancing efforts on Malheur Lake required significant commitments of resources from the Refuge and partners. This necessary commitment of resources prevented work on integrated wetland/river planning and testing. The Ecology Work Group (established in the CCP) focused on obtaining data in wet meadow habitats related to the grazing and haying program through independent third party monitoring. This collaborative effort recognized the need for developing a state and transition model. Due to habitat configurations it was found not possible to fully develop needed science on Refuge lands alone. The scientific effort was then expanded to other parts of the Basin with support from Refuge permittee resources.
    [Show full text]