Biological Control of Weeds: Theory and Practical Application

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biological Control of Weeds: Theory and Practical Application Biological Control of Weeds: theory and practical application Mic Julien and Graham White Biological Control of Weeds: theory and practical application Mic Julien and Graham White The Australian Centre for lnrernational Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an ACT of the Australian Parliament. Irs mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing counrry researchers in fields where Australia has a special research competence. Where rrade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against and product by the Centre. ACIAR Monograph Series This peer reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR's research objecrives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on developing countries. O Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 260 1, Australia. Julien, Mic and White, Graham. 1997. Biological Control of Weeds: theory and practical application. ACIAR Monograph No. 49 192pp. lSBN 1 86320 216 1 Typeset and layout: Design One Solutions, Canberra, Australia Production managemenr: I'eter Lynch Biological Control of Weeds: an illustrated seminar ................ 1 Mic julien Success, and Failure, in Biological Control of Weeds. .............9 Mic julien A History of Biological Control of weeds ..................... 17 Rachel McFadyen and Brian Wilhon Introduction to Weed Science. ............................ .23 Steve Adkins Population Ecology and Biological Control of Weeds ............39 Graham White Procedures in Biological Control of Weeds ....................47 Wendy Forno Exploration of Agents ................................... .51 Wendy Forno and Matthew Purcell Prioritising Weed Biological Control Agents ................... 57 jenn;fer Marohq Protocols and Quarantine Procedures for Importation and Release of Biological Control Agents ...........63 Rachel McFadyen Compiling a Plant List for Testing the Host Range ofAgents ......71 Wendy Forno and Tim Heard Host Range Testing of Insects ..............................77 Tim Heard Decision Making Based on Host Range Tests ................. .83 Rachel McFadyen and Tim Heard Mass Rearing of Insects for Biological Control of Weeds. ......... 89 Graham Donnelly Distribution of Agents. ...................................97 Tony Wright Contents ii Establishment of Agents .................................101 Tony Wright Measuring the Impact of Biological Control Agents on Weeds .... 105 Grant FarreII and Mark Lonsdale Plant Pathogens as Classical Control Agents .................. 119 Allan Tornley Bioherbicides. ......................................... 129 Bruce A. Auld Mass Production of Fungi for Biopesticides. ..................135 Bruce A. Auld Plant Propagation and Culture ............................ 141 Gio. W Fichera Aquatic Plant Cultivation ................................ 151 Shaun Winterton The Importance ofTaxonomy in Biological Control Studies. ..... 157 Don Sand Climate Matching Using the CLIMEX Program. .............. 165 Gunter Maywald and Robert Sutherst A Participatory Approach to Biological Control of Weeds. .......177 Larissa Bilston and GeoffNorton Benefit Cost Analysis for Biological Control Projects. ...........185 David Adamson Preface Weed problems in the Asia-Pacific region are becoming areas, a joint venture - the Coooperative Research increasingly difficult to manage. Most countries in the Centre for Tropical Pest Management (CTPM) - region are not only faced with a higher risk of exotic was established in 1991, involving GIRO Entomology, weed introduction, the result of a major increase in Queensland Department of Natural Resources and travel and trade, but are also attempting to reduce Primary Industries and the University of Queensland. their reliance on herbicides for environmental, health and sustainability reasons. Against this background, It was decided very early in the life of CTPM that an biological control clearly has a major role to play in international course in Biological Control of Tropical the region, either on its own or, increasingly, as part of Weeds would enhance the international research effort an integrated weed management strategy. in this field. The aim was to provide participants with the key knowledge, information and skills they require In Australia, many of the major tropical weed to implement a biological control project in their problems are associated with extensive agricultural countries. To date, 52 participants from 21 countries activities and biological control is ofien the only have attended the four courses organised, with major feasible means of control. As a result, considerable funding coming from ACIAR, the Crawford Fund effort has been devoted to weed biological control, and GTZ. with considerable success. Indeed, it is generally recognised that Australia is a world leader in the Since the course was first established, we have received development and implementation of practical weed many requests for additional copies of the excellent biological control. During the past decade, CSIRO lecture notes that were provided for course participants. Entomology and Queensland Department of Natural This book is the result. We are extremely grateful to Resources have been involved in a number of ACIAR for funding the production of this book and, collaborative projects on weed biological control with in particular, to Paul Ferrar - Research Program neighbouring countries in the Asia-Pacific region, Coordinator in ACIAR - for his initial and on-going largely funded through the Australian Centre for encouragement and enthusiasm for the course and the International Agricultural Research (ACIAR). book. I am sure this book will make an important contribution to an increase in the biological control of However, having the will to collaborate and increase weeds in the Asia-Pacific region and worldwide. effort in biological control of weeds is one thing, to achieve practical implementation is another matter. It involves the cooperation of a number of key players Director, Centrefor Tropical Pest Management, and spans a range of disciplines, from taxonomy and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. ecology to political and socioeconomic science. To achieve increased cooperation in Australia in weed September 199Z biological control and in other pest management Introduction iv The Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Pest developing a list of plants for host testing, or climate Management (CTPM) has presented four courses in matching using a computer model. Others are case Biological Control of Weeds since 1993. Each course studies illustrating the decision making processes included sessions at Centre for Tropical Pest Manage- required, e.g. interpreting results from host range ment headquarters on The University of Queensland tests. Relevant theory is introduced, but approaches campus, and at CSIRO Entomology at Long Pocket that have proven not to be useful in practice, such as Laboratories and Queensland Department of Natural ecologically and biologically based ranking systems for Resources at the Alan Fletcher Research Station which potential agents, and speculative issues for which little specialise in the biological control of weeds. data are available, such as negative environmental impacts of weed biological control agents, are not The course was designed for scientists and managers discussed in detail. who are to be involved in the regulation, management or implementation of biological control of weeds but Some aspects of the course could not be captured in a have limited experience in the area. The main aims of book. For instance, the courses provided a forum to the course are to give participants a balanced under- develop contacts to keep up to date with activities and standing of the theory of weed biological control and to source control agents. It also provided an opportunity a practical exposure to the procedures followed in a for additional formal and informal discussions with weed biological control program. experienced scientists about specific weed problems and their management. For some chapters of the Participants to the courses received a set of notes. This book, practical demonstrations during the courses book is a compilation of those notes, but with consider- assisted in clarification of techniques. able expansion and modification and the addition of references, to make them suitable for publication. Altogether the papers in this book provide an overview of biological control of weeds with an emphasis on how The book covers in broad terms the theory under- to go about it. However, it is only a starting point and pinning some aspects of biological control of weeds, key material from the large literature on biological discusses the various stages of a project in some detail control of weeds is referenced throughout the book. from its beginnings to evaluating the impact of agents after they have been released. It introduces techniques Graham White' and that may be usefully applied in a project. It also touches Mic Julien' on some contemporary issues and methods such as host range testing, use of fungi as control agents and selection of the most appropriate agents. Some sections ' CTPM, Gehrmann Laboratories, University of Queenskznd! 4072, Australia are purely methodology, e.g. propagating plants for CSIRO Entornol~~Pyiuate
Recommended publications
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment
    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Reproductive Biology of Cerambycids
    4 Reproductive Biology of Cerambycids Lawrence M. Hanks University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, Illinois Qiao Wang Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand CONTENTS 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 133 4.2 Phenology of Adults ..................................................................................................................... 134 4.3 Diet of Adults ............................................................................................................................... 138 4.4 Location of Host Plants and Mates .............................................................................................. 138 4.5 Recognition of Mates ................................................................................................................... 140 4.6 Copulation .................................................................................................................................... 141 4.7 Larval Host Plants, Oviposition Behavior, and Larval Development .......................................... 142 4.8 Mating Strategy ............................................................................................................................ 144 4.9 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 148 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of Casmara Subagronoma (Lepidoptera
    insects Article The Biology of Casmara subagronoma (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae), a Stem-Boring Moth of Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Myrtaceae): Descriptions of the Previously Unknown Adult Female and Immature Stages, and Its Potential as a Biological Control Candidate Susan A. Wineriter-Wright 1, Melissa C. Smith 1,* , Mark A. Metz 2 , Jeffrey R. Makinson 3 , Bradley T. Brown 3, Matthew F. Purcell 3, Kane L. Barr 4 and Paul D. Pratt 5 1 USDA-ARS Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314, USA; [email protected] 2 USDA-ARS Systematic Entomology Lab, Beltsville, MD 20013-7012, USA; [email protected] 3 USDA-ARS Australian Biological Control Laboratory, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Dutton Park QLD 4102, Australia; jeff[email protected] (J.R.M.); [email protected] (B.T.B.); [email protected] (M.F.P.) 4 USDA-ARS Center for Medical, Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA; [email protected] 5 USDA-ARS, Western Regional Research Center, Invasive Species and Pollinator Health Research Unit, 800 Buchanan Street, Albany, CA 94710, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-954-475-6549 Received: 27 August 2020; Accepted: 16 September 2020; Published: 23 September 2020 Simple Summary: Rhodomyrtus tomentosa is a perennial woody shrub throughout Southeast Asia. Due to its prolific flower and fruit production, it was introduced into subtropical areas such as Florida and Hawai’i, where it is now naturalized and invasive. In an effort to find sustainable means to control R. tomentosa, a large-scale survey was mounted for biological control organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlling Invasion of the Exotic Shrub (Mimosa Pigra) in Tropical Australian Wetlands
    Controlling invasion of the exotic shrub (Mimosa pigra) in tropical Australian wetlands Michelle Marko Introduction to exotics in Australia Exotics have been introduced to Australia since the time of European settlement, beginning in the 1800s. Whether deliberately or accidentally introduced, some species such as feral cats (Felis catus), the cane toad (Bufo marinus), athel trees (Tamarix aphyllabitou) and the bitou bush (Chrysanthemoides monilifera), have wrought devastation. The majority of exotics have little impact on the natural ecosystem, but those that do (between 2-40 %) are aggressive invaders that can successfully compete for niches previously occupied by native species. Many exotics not currently problematic have the potential to cause serious damage in the future (Hobbs and Humphries 1995). These exotics negatively modify the richness and abundance of other species and therefore alter the function of the natural ecosystems (Storrs and Lonsdale 1995). In Australia, about 15% of the overall vascular flora are naturalized alien species, which is estimated to be 15,000-20,000 species (Environment Australia 1998). The Northern Territory, with around 4-5 % weeds, has the lowest percentage of any state or territory in Australia. However, in the Northern Territory, Sida sp., salvinia (Salvinia molesta), Hyptis suaveolens, water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), and giant sensitive plant (Mimosa pigra) are considered major threats (CSIRO 1997). Mimosa pigra, in particular, is considered one of Australia's worst weeds of conservation. In this paper, I will discuss methods to control Mimosa pigra and some areas of future research. Invasiveness of Mimosa pigra Mimosa pigra L. (Mimosaceae) poses a tremendous threat to agriculture, the conservation of wetlands and land use practices of the Aboriginal people of Australia (Braithwaite et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasitoids of Queensland Fruit Fly Bactrocera Tryoni in Australia and Prospects for Improved Biological Control
    Insects 2012, 3, 1056-1083; doi:10.3390/insects3041056 OPEN ACCESS insects ISSN 2075-4450 www.mdpi.com/journal/insects/ Review Parasitoids of Queensland Fruit Fly Bactrocera tryoni in Australia and Prospects for Improved Biological Control Ashley L. Zamek 1,, Jennifer E. Spinner 2 Jessica L. Micallef 1, Geoff M. Gurr 3 and Olivia L. Reynolds 4,* 1 Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Woodbridge Road, Menangle, NSW 2568, Australia; E-Mails: [email protected] (A.L.Z.); [email protected] (J.L.M) 2 EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University, Locked Bag 588, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University, Charles Sturt University, P.O. Box 883, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Charles Sturt University, Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute, Woodbridge Road, Menangle, NSW 2568, Australia Present address: Level 1, 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Australia. * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-0-2-4640-6426; Fax: +61-0-2-4640-6300. Received: 3 September 2012; in revised form: 4 October 2012 / Accepted: 10 October 2012 / Published: 22 October 2012 Abstract: This review draws together available information on the biology, methods for study, and culturing of hymenopteran parasitoids of the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni, and assesses prospects for improving biological control of this serious pest.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Flat Faced Longhorn Beetles (Cerambycidae: Lamiinae) from the Reserve Forests of Dooars, West Bengal, India
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation ISRN Entomology Volume 2013, Article ID 737193, 8 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/737193 Research Article Exploring Flat Faced Longhorn Beetles (Cerambycidae: Lamiinae) from the Reserve Forests of Dooars, West Bengal, India Sumana Saha,1 Hüseyin Özdikmen,2 Manish Kanti Biswas,3 and Dinendra Raychaudhuri4 1 Department of Zoology, Darjeeling Government College, Government of West Bengal, Darjeeling, West Bengal 734101, India 2 Gazi Universitesi,¨ Fen-Edebiyat Fakultesi,¨ Biyoloji Bol¨ um¨ u,¨ 06500 Ankara, Turkey 3 Department of Zoology, Sreegopal Banerjee College, Mogra, Hooghly, West Bengal 712148, India 4 Entomology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Calcutta, 35 Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata, West Bengal 700019, India Correspondence should be addressed to Dinendra Raychaudhuri; [email protected] Received 25 June 2013; Accepted 7 August 2013 Academic Editors: Y. Fan and P. Simoes˜ Copyright © 2013 Sumana Saha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The present study deals with 29 lamiid species under 21 genera of Dooars, West Bengal, India. These include 4 newly recorded species, namely, Macrochenus isabellinus Aurivillius, Aesopida malasiaca Thomson, Pterolophia (Hylobrotus) lateralis Gahan and Nupserha quadrioculata (Thunberg) from India while 16 others (marked by ∙)fromthestate. 1. Introduction We (saving the second author) for nearly two decades are involved in the exploration of the long horn beetles of Subfamily Lamiinae (Cerambycidae) include members of flat the area. Present communication is one such outcome on the faced longhorn beetles that are both xylophagous and phy- lamiids dealing with 29 species under 21 genera.
    [Show full text]
  • 22 329-331.Pdf
    Vol. XXII, No. 2, Sept. 1976 329 Introductions for Biological Control in Hawaii, 1974 H.K. NakaoandG.Y. Funasaki STATE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE HONOLULU, HAWAII The Entomology Branch of the Hawaii Department of Agriculture has maintained a beneficial organism introduction program for many years. This paper includes a list of insects introduced for biological control during 1974, and gives notes on the status of some pests and their purposely introduced natural enemies. Weed Pest Control Ageratina riparia (Regel) K. & R. (Hamakua pamakani). The stem galling tephritid, Procecidochares alani Steyskal (previously reported as P. near pleuralis Aldrich) was initially released on Hawaii on April 9, 1974 to aid in the control of Hamakua pamakani, a noxious range- land weed. By July, developing galls on stems were observed at various release sites on Hawaii and at Nuuanu, Oahu. The leaf defoliating pterophorid, Oidaematophorus sp., which was initially released in October 1973, has not been recovered to date. Clidemia hirta (L.) (Roster's curse). Light infestations and feeding damage on Clidemia by the leaf rolling pyralid, Blepharomastix ebulealis Guenee were noted in October 1974 along a two-mile stretch on the Kawaiiki Trail, Oahu at an elevation of 1,300 to 1,400 feet. This is the first recovery of this moth since its release in 1971. Insect Pest Control Aleurocanthus spiniferus Quaintance (orange spiny whitefly) Infestations of this aleyrodid were discovered for the first time in the State on foliage of roses in the Kapiolani Rose Garden, Waikiki, Oahu on July 12, 1974. Subsequent surveys revealed scattered light to heavy infestations on roses, citrus, persimmons, grapes and pears in the Waikiki, Kapahulu and Kaimuki areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade Comunitária Regional De Chapecó
    1 UNIVERSIDADE COMUNITÁRIA REGIONAL DE CHAPECÓ Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais Daniela Roberta Holdefer Woldan ANÁLISE FAUNÍSTICA DE CERAMBYCIDAE (COLEOPTERA) EM DUAS SITUAÇÕES FLORÍSTICAS NO MUNICÍPIO DE UNIÃO DA VITÓRIA – PARANÁ Chapecó – SC, 2007 Livros Grátis http://www.livrosgratis.com.br Milhares de livros grátis para download. 2 UNIVERSIDADE COMUNITÁRIA REGIONAL DE CHAPECÓ Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais ANÁLISE FAUNÍSTICA DE CERAMBYCIDAE (COLEOPTERA) EM DUAS SITUAÇÕES FLORÍSTICAS NO MUNICÍPIO DE UNIÃO DA VITÓRIA – PARANÁ Daniela Roberta Holdefer Woldan Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós- graduação da Universidade Comunitária Regional de Chapecó, como parte dos pré-requisitos para obtenção do título de Mestre em Ciências Ambientais. Orientador: Dr. Flávio Roberto Mello Garcia Chapecó – SC, agosto, 2007 3 ii UNIVERSIDADE COMUNITÁRIA REGIONAL DE CHAPECÓ Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais ANÁLISE FAUNÍSTICA DE CERAMBYCIDAE (COLEOPTERA) EM DUAS SITUAÇÕES FLORÍSTICAS NO MUNICÍPIO DE UNIÃO DA VITÓRIA – PARANÁ Daniela Roberta Holdefer Woldan Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós- graduação da Universidade Comunitária Regional de Chapecó, como parte dos pré-requisitos para obtenção do título de Mestre em Ciências Ambientais. Orientador: Dr. Flávio Roberto Mello Garcia Chapecó – SC, agosto, 2007 4iii FICHA CATALOGRÁFICA 595.7648 Woldan, Daniela Roberta Holdefer W852a Análise faunística de Cerambycidae (Coleoptera), em duas situações florísticas no município de União da Vitória
    [Show full text]
  • The Reproductive Biology, Natural Enemies and Biological Control of Delairea Odorata Lem
    The Reproductive Biology, Natural Enemies and Biological Control of Delairea odorata Lem. by Carol Ann Rolando Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the School of Botany and Zoology, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, March 2000 ABSTRACT Delairea odorata Lem., an asteraceous perennial vine indigenous to southern Africa, has become naturalised and invasive in many subtropical regions including California, South Australia and Hawaii. Biological control offers a potential long term solution to the management of this species in exotic locations. This study analysed aspects ofthe biology ofD. odorata in its native environment to determine its suitability to classical biological control. To this end an examination of the reproductive biology and natural enemies of D. odorata was made. A study of the pyrrolizidine alkaloid profile was also conducted. Reproductive biology: Delairea odorata reproduces both sexually by seeds and asexually by stolons. The flowering season occurs over the autumn months from April to June. Results ofthe pollination trials indicate thatD. odorata is a cross compatible species and an obligate outbreeder. There is no specialised pollination system and the predorninant pollinators belong to the families Apidae, Syrphidae and Calliphoridae. Following pollination, numerous small achenes are produced. Laboratory trials indicate that these achenes germinate readily between 10 and 25 QC and, although germination occurs in both the light and dark, light clearly stimulates seed germination. Greenhouse trials conducted to determine the effect of light on growth and reproduction indicate that D. odorata is a shade tolerant species which shows plasticity in terms ofgrowth form and deployment ofbiomass in response to changes in light intensity.
    [Show full text]
  • Crop and Stored Grain Pest and Their Management. (ENTO-4311)
    Lec. 1(p.1 – 2): Introduction of Economic Entomology and Economic Classification of Insect Pests Lec. 2-5 (p.3- 15) Rice: Yellow stem borer, gallmidge, brown planthopper, green leafhopper, hispa, leaf folder, ear head bug, grasshoppers, root weevil, swarming caterpillar, climbing cutworm, case worm, whorl maggot, leaf mite, panicle mite, IPM practices in rice. Lec. 6-8 (p.16- 25) Sorghum and other millets: Sorghum shoot fly, stem borer, pink borer, sorghum midge, ear head bug, red hairy caterpillar, deccan wingless grasshopper, aphids, maize shoot bug, flea beetle, blister beetles, ragi cutworm, ragi root aphid, army worm. Wheat: Ghujia weevil, ragi pink borer, termites. Lec. 9-11 (p. 26- 33) Sugarcane: Early shoot borer, internodal borer, top shoot borer, scales, leafhoppers, white grub, mealy bugs, termites, whiteflies, woolly aphid, yellow mite. Lec 12- 14 (p.34- 47) Cotton: Spotted bollworm, american bollworm, pink bollworm, tobacco caterpillar, leafhopper, whiteflies, aphid, mites , thrips, red cotton bug, dusky cotton bug, leaf roller, stem weevil, grasshoppers, mealybug, IPM in cotton. Lec. 15 (p.48 - 51) Jute: jute semilooper, jute stem weevil, jute stem girdler, Bihar hairy caterpillar Mesta: Hairy caterpillars, stem weevil, mealy bugs, leafhopper, aphid. Sunhemp: Hairy caterpillars, stem borer, flea beetle. Lec. 16-17 (p.52- 59) Pulses: Gram caterpillar, plume moth, pod fly, stem fly, spotted pod borer, cowpea aphid, cow bug, pod bug, leafhopper, stink bug, green pod boring caterpillar, blue butterflies, redgram mite. Pea: pea leaf miner and pea stem fly Soyabean: Stem fly, ragi cutworm, leaf miner, whitefly. Lec. 18 (p.60- 63) Castor: Semilooper, shoot and capsule borer, tobacco caterpillar, leafhopper, butterfly, whitefly, thrips, castor slug, mite.
    [Show full text]
  • Α-Terpineol and (E)-2-Hexenol Are Important Pheromone Components Of
    Environmental Entomology, 47(6), 2018, 1547–1552 doi: 10.1093/ee/nvy126 Advance Access Publication Date: 21 August 2018 Chemical Ecology Research The Common Natural Products (S)-α-Terpineol and (E)-2-Hexenol are Important Pheromone Components of Megacyllene antennata (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ee/article-abstract/47/6/1547/5077147 by ESA Member Access user on 08 December 2018 Robert F. Mitchell,1,2,6,7 Ann M. Ray,3 Lawrence M. Hanks,4 and Jocelyn G. Millar5 1Department of Neuroscience, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, 2Center for Insect Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, 3Department of Biology, Xavier University, Cincinnati, OH 45207, 4Department of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, 5Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, 6Present address: Department of Biology, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh WI 54901, and 7Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Subject Editor: Dong H. Cha Received 12 April 2018; Editorial decision 1 August 2018 Abstract We report here the pheromone of Megacyllene antennata (White) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), a species native to southwestern North America whose larvae feed in woody tissues of mesquite (Prosopis species; Fabaceae). Adult males sex-specifically produced a blend of eight common natural products, including the monoterpene alcohol (S)-α-terpineol; the monoterpenes (S)-limonene and terpinolene; the aromatic alcohols (R)-1-phenylethanol and 2-phenylethanol; and (E)-2-hexenol, (E)-2-hexenal, and 1-hexanol. Individual males produced the components in varying amounts, but (S)-α-terpineol and (E)-2-hexenal were always present and together constituted the majority of the blend.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note
    Lepidoptera Recorded for Imperial County California Compiled by Jeffrey Caldwell [email protected] 1-925-949-8696 Note: BMNA = Butterflies and Moths of North America web site MPG = Moth Photographers Group web site Most are from the Essig Museum’s California Moth Specimens Database web site Arctiidae. Tiger and Lichen Moths. Apantesis proxima (Notarctia proxima). Mexican Tiger Moth. 8181 [BMNA] Ectypia clio (clio). Clio Tiger Moth. 8249 Estigmene acrea (acrea). Salt Marsh Moth. 8131 Euchaetes zella. 8232 Autostichidae (Deoclonidae). Oegoconia novimundi. Four-spotted Yellowneck Moth. 1134 (Oegoconia quadripuncta mis-applied) Bucculatricidae. Ribbed Cocoon-maker Moths. Bucculatrix enceliae. Brittlebrush Moth. 0546 Cossidae. Goat Moths, Carpenterworm Moths, and Leopard Moths. Comadia henrici. 2679 Givira mucida. 2660 Hypopta palmata. 2656 Prionoxystus robiniae (mixtus). Carpenterworm or Locust Borer. 2693 Depressariidae. Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 [MPG] Ethmiidae. Now assigned to Depressariidae. Ethmiinae. Ethmia timberlakei. 0984 Pseudethmia protuberans. 1008 Gelechiidae. Twirler Moths. Aristotelia adceanotha. 1726 [Sighting 1019513 BMNA] Chionodes abdominella. 2054 Chionodes dentella. 2071 Chionodes fructuaria. 2078 Chionodes kincaidella. 2086 (reared from Atriplex acanthocarpa in Texas) Chionodes oecus. 2086.2 Chionodes sistrella. 2116 Chionodes xanthophilella. 2125 Faculta inaequalis. Palo Verde Webworm. 2206 Friseria cockerelli. Mesquite Webworm. 1916 Gelechia desiliens. 1938 Isophrictis sabulella. 1701 Keiferia lycopersicella. Tomato Pinworm. 2047 Pectinophora gossypiella. Pink Bollworm. 2261 Prolita puertella. 1895 Prolita veledae. 1903 Geometridae. Inchworm Moths, Loopers, Geometers, or Measuring Worms. Archirhoe neomexicana. 7295 Chesiadodes coniferaria. 6535 Chlorochlamys appellaria. 7073 Cyclophora nanaria. Dwarf Tawny Wave. W 7140 Dichorda illustraria. 7055 Dichordophora phoenix. Phoenix Emerald. 7057 Digrammia colorata. Creosote Moth. 6381 Digrammia irrorata (rubricata). 6395 Digrammia pictipennata. 6372 Digrammia puertata.
    [Show full text]