Geological Survey of Canada, Completed a Survey of Copper-Nickel Occurrences in the Pigeon River Area in 1935

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geological Survey of Canada, Completed a Survey of Copper-Nickel Occurrences in the Pigeon River Area in 1935 2.276 PARDEE 010 INTRODUCTION Standard Nickel Mines Limited own 14 contiguous non-patented mining claims comprising of approximately 560 acres located in the south- west quarter of Pardee Township, Thunder Bay Mining Division , Ontario. The claims can be seen on the Ontario Department of Mines Plan No. M 1856 and are registered as follows: TB 250808 TB 250815 TB 250809 TB 250816 TB 250810 TB 250817 TB 250811 TB 250818 TB 250812 TB 250819 TB 250813 TB 250820 TB 250814 TB 250821 The property is assessible from Thunder Bay by Highway No. 61 and Highway No. 597. This distance is approximately 45 miles. HISTORY The Standard Nickel Mines property is tied on to the west of the Great Lakes Nickel Limited property where a copper-nickel-precious metal ore body of in excess of 100 million tons is at present being financed for production. T. L. Tanton of the Geological Survey of Canada, completed a survey of copper-nickel occurrences in the Pigeon River area in 1935. His paper G. S. C. 35-1, 1935 refers to the presence of copper-nickel sulphide mineralization on the Standard Nickel property: -2- "In the northeast quarter of Lot 11, Con. VII, Pardee Township, a sill of diabase is exposed on a cliff. In the course of a traverse along this cliff an assistant collected a specimen of diabase containing sparsely disseminated grains of pyrrhotite and chalcopyrite. While returning to camp on this traverse he met Mr. Aho, a settler whose residence is about l 3/4 miles southwest of the above mentioned occurrence, and from him obtained a specimen of sulphide-bearing diabase, said to have been collected from the same cliff (precise locality not known). The latter specimen consisted of fresh-looking massive diabase, and contained pyrrhotite in about equal amount making up about 5^o of the volume of the rock. When tested chemically the specimen yielded a positive reaction for nickel. No mineral development work has been done at the local ity. Sofar as known the property is not privately owned. " In 1966, a certain amount of diamond drilling was done by Grasset Lake Mines Limited and the one deep hole encountered sulphide mineralization. Open File No. 5028 in the Library of the Ontario Department of Mines entitled "Geology of Devon and Pardee Townships and Stuart Locations© 1 by J. J. C. Geul was prepared in 1968. The following excerpt was taken from this report: At the Grasset Lake property (now Standard Nickel Mines) 4 short holes with a total foot age of 904 feet and l long hole 1446 feet deep are mentioned. The deep hole was logged and basic intrusives found as follows:- -3- O - 113 Diabase 700 - 706 Diabase 800 - 926 Coarse porphyritic gabbro with a 6 inch calcite vein carrying chalcopyrite 1161 - 1166 Diabase 1360 - 1365 Diabase 1378 - 1422 Porphyritic diabase On investigating the work carried out by Grasset Lake Mines which is on file with the Ontario Department of Mines, it was found that there were 3 not 4 holes put down totalling 900 feet and one deep hole which reached a depth of 1446 feet. In the records the core is logged as gabbro with fine grained and coarse sections containing sparse pyrite and pyrrhotite in places. Some of the intrusive sections are no doubt diabase but some of the coarser porphyritic sections are debatable and may be gabbro. Originally the Great Lakes intrusive was mappe d as diabase by Government Geologists but in later mapping it was reclassified as anorthositic gabbro. During the summer of 1970, J. Sugden, a geologist was retained by the company to carry out a geological mapping program on the Standard Nickel property claims. In the spring of 1972, a vertical diamond drill hole was put down on the eastern part of the property to a depth of 672 feet. Nothing of economic interest was encountered at this depth. -4- REGIONAL GEOLOGY The geology of the area surrounding the Standard Nickel property consists of sediments of the Rove formation which have been intruded by i dykes and sills of Keewanaween diabase. This complex has subsequently been intruded by a basic intrusive of anorthositic gabbro which is younger in age and related to the Duluth gabbro. The basement rock consists of the iron bearing Gunflint formation. ECONOMIC GEOLOGY The younger anorthositic gabbro intrusive mentioned above has been located on the adjacent Great Lakes Nickel property and acts as the host rock for the copper-nickel mineralizatiai that extends for several miles. On the Great Lakes Nickel property this younger mineralized gabbro has been found intruding the older series and near the eastern end is located near the Gunflint formation at depths of over 3, 000 feet. Since intrusives of this favourable anorthositic gabbro occur adjacent to the claims of StandardNickel Mines it is conceivable that such an intrusive exists on the property. It can be either underlain or overlain by the Rove sediments or diabase. Preliminary work completed on the Standard Nickel claims indicate that the area is underlain by the Rove formation which has been intruded by the Keewanaween diabase. The deepest hole drilled on these -5- claims to date is 1422 feet. Near the base of this hole porphyritic diabase was reported which may be related to the Duluth gabbro and part of this younger intrusive. Since the property has not been tested to the depth of the Gunflint formation it is not known whether or not a favourable layer of mineralized younger intrusive exists on the property. Because this younger gabbro has been found immediately adjacent to the property it is conceivable that such an intrusive also underlays the claims of Standard Nickel Mines. RECOMMENDATIONS 1) One or two holes should be deepened to over 2, 500 feet in order to determine the geology down to this depth. (Gunflint). 2) After completion of the above program, an assessment of the geological information should be made by an expert on the region, such as Dr. J. A. McCuaig. Following on Dr. McCuaig©s recommendations, consideration should be given to deepening a hole to a depth that will intersect the basement rock on Gunflint formation. 3) Theestimated cost of these holes to a depth of 2, 500 feet and making this geological assessment will amount to $15, 000. Respectfully submitted, 52A*4SWei07 2 .276 PARDEE 020 STANDARD NICKEL MINES LIMITED Pardee Township-Ontario A geological examination and a prospecting program was carried out by the writer^ a s si ste d by Mr. Allan Speed on a 14 claim property in Pardee Township, Ontario. The field work was carried out during September 1970. The results of the geological survey are plotted on the accompanying map at a scale of l inch to 500 feet. There were no recent picket lines available. However, the mapping was controlled adequately by means of the east-west surveyed line between Concession VJ and VII across lin- entire proper t y. Jn addition the topographic relief of the area is very prominent and air photos at a scale of l inch to 1/4 mile were used with a pocket stereo scope for control purposes. PROPERTY The property comprises 14 contiguous claims in Concessions VI and VII, Pardee Township, Thunder Bay District, Ontario. These are numbered as follows:- 250B9B to 25032.1 inclusive - 14 claims These claims are located only 41/2 miles north of the Internat ional Boundary along the Pigeon River. The eastern boundary of this group is adjacent to the Larsen gravel road, about 9 miles westerly along this road from its junction with Highway 61. The Larsen road intersects Highway 6l about 30 miles southerly from the city of Thunder Bay. The property of ©Great Lakes Nickel Limited lies just east of the claim group described in this report. IONOGRAPHY The topographic relief is more than 500 feet across the properly i^™.——^—- which consists mainly of a flat-topped mesa bordered oy precipitous cliffs with basal talus slopes rising above a flat plain at an elevation of less than l, 100 feet above sea level. The mesa is .slice-l S/ ;i number o 1 steep .linear valleys trending mainly easterly to .E. N. E. IDI\^YIOF S. WORK Grasset Lake Mines Limited held this property during 1965-66. They drilled 4 vertical holes as located on the accompanying geological map. The cores are stored at the sites and the logs of these holes are indicated on the geological map. There is some remaining evidence of a series of picket lines dating from this work-period. s u CT. I GE OJu O 3ICA L COL UMN^ P ROT EJU)Zpj (^ Keweenawan - Late Diabase Dykes Logan Diabase Sheets and Sills Animikie - Rove formation - Argillite and ureyxvacke GEOLOGY AND STRUCTURE - cont©d The Rove sediments underlie the entire area, dipping at angles of less than 10 except where there is local disturbance near the borders of intrusives. These are mainly rather thinly-bedded argillites of fine grain varying from dark grey to black in colour. They are interbedded with paler grey to dark grey greywacke, generally thicker-bedded. Near the; eastern limit of the claims, a rusty zone within the sediments is exposed along the cliff below the diabase cap of the mesa. This rust is Hue to oxidation of very fine: grained disseminated pyrite, apparent l y o! syngenetic origin in the sediments. The top of the hill is covered by a diabase sheet or sill which is about 100 feet thick. This intrusion is essentially conformable with the underlying sediments. It is a typical medium grained diabase which shows a well chilled margin where exposed.
Recommended publications
  • Report of Resident Geologists, 1970
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMARY TECHNICAL REPORT Elkin Des Richesses Naturelles, Québec
    GM 07690 SUMMARY TECHNICAL REPORT Elkin des Richesses Naturelles, Québec ..... w__...::.._ ..... .:_......_ SERVICE DES Gl~`ES aI1NERAUX r/ ~ 6, ît) No G~1- _._._ TECHNICAL REPORT -on- MINING CLAIMS Nos.A-270396 to 398 incl. 09 99 I3o5.A-270101 and 270402 99 99 Nos,A-270111 to 430 incl. ST.HELEN YOWNSFIIP, ABITIBI EAST COUNTY'Que. -for- ST, HELEN "MINING EXPLORATION * LTD. (No Personal Liability) -by- L.Germain,P.Eng, REPORT No. M - 109 DATE: October 20th, 1958 7062 PIE IX BOULEVARD TF.L. RAYMOND 2-3771 Kroztarb OrrYltatYt B A.. A.R C.S. (ENGLAND) CONSULTING ENGINEER MINING & CHEMICAL MEMBER OF THE CORPORATION OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS OF QUEBEC MEMBER OF THE C.I.M.M. AND A.A.A. S. innntrral. October 20th, 1958 CANADA INTRODUCTION The present report is being produced specifically to conform with the requirements of the Quebec Securities Act. It is supplemen- ted by two maps, one shoving the location of the Company's hold- ings in St.Helen Township, in the electoral district of Abitibi East, Quebec, and the other, shoving the locations of the various mining properties mentioned in the present report, as well as the regional geology. • For reasons given in detail in the present report, the author considers this mining property worth prospecting for a combination of precious and base metals, more particularly, for gold, silver, copper and zinc. It should, however, be clearly understood that this opinion is based on the author's knowledge of the regional geology, structure and diamond trilling results on some of the properties lying within the area, and, is not directly derived from the results..' of actual exploration of the property itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporting Issuer List
    Ontario Securities Commission Please note The default status of a reporting issuer shown on the list is as of the date of the last update indicated. More current information may be obtained by calling the Contact Centre at 416-593-8314 or 1-877-785-1555 (Toll Free). Last Updated on May 25, 2021 at 08:04:20 am Legend 1a. Failure to file annual financial statements. 1b. Failure to file interim financial statements. 1c. Failure to file an annual or interim management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) or annual or interim management report of fu nd performance (MRFP). 1d. Failure to file an Annual Information Form (AIF). 1e. Failure to file a certification of annual or interim filings required by Multilateral Instrument 52 -109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings (MI 52-109). 1f. Failure to file required proxy materials or a required information circular. 1g. Failure to file an issuer profile supplement on the System for Electronic Disclosure by Insiders (SEDI) . 1h. Failure to file a material change report. 1i. Failure to provide a written update after filing a confidential report of a material change. 1j. Failure to file a business acquisition report. 1k. Failure to file annual oil and gas disclosure prescribed by National Instrument 51 -101 Standards of Disclosure of Oil and Gas Activities (NI 51-101) or technical reports for a mineral project required under NI 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI 43-101). 1l. Failure to file a mandatory news release. 1m. Failure to file corporate governance disclosure as required by National Instrument 58 -101 Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMARY of FIELD WORK, 1967 by the GEOLOGICAL BRANCH
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Exploration
    GM 07819 REPORT ON EXPLORATION ORCHAN MINES L,.JD. PROPERTIES IN F NELON, SUBERCASE, ISLE DIEU AND GALINEE TOWNSHIPS NORTHWESTERN QUEBEC ~ ~ ~ D~ Q T~s0`"~1~~~~ * ~ ~7 j.~1 j~~~ estesl C~~~la~~~~1 D~S zue Doleh est, „5 OuOu t 1 P.0; 6G tY~a ~ ~~ _l Riéjwss6 Naturélïts, Québec det ~~.ilv CE DE LA ► .:AN1Q:U.E DOCUM~ZdTAT4ON TF.:r Daté: y/ (do Gi.i: .......~ ~ December 1,. 195e Mr. J. P. Dolan, President Orchan Mines, Ltd. 100 Adelaide Street West Toronto, Ontario Dear Sir: In accordance with your instructions I submit, herewith, my report on previous development work and on exploration possibilities of your properties in Isle-Dieu, Galinee, Subercase and Fenelon Townships, Counties of Abitibi-East and Abitibi-hest, Quebec. In addition, this report includes recommer- dations for future exploration programs on all proper- ties plus an estimate of costs of such programs and time required to complete same. Yours very truly, GPJ/ja I, Charles Philip Jenney, of the Town of Oakville, in the Province of Ontario, do hereby certify as follows: 1. That I am a ponsulting Geologist registered as a member in good standing of the Association of Professional Engineers of the Province of Ontario. 2. That the following is a true statement of my education, experience, and affiliations: Columbia University, New York 1926-30, B.A. 1930 1930-33, M.A. 1933,Ph.D. 1936 (Geology) Princeton University, 1933-34 1934-36, Geologist, Consolidated Oil Corp., New York. 1936-43, Mine & Exploration Geologist, McIntyre Porcupine Mines, Schumacher, Ontario. 1943-49, Mgr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mining Industry of the Province of Quebec in 1959 Emoy, ,'''
    GM 67014 THE MINING INDUSTRY OF THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC IN 1959 EMOY, ,''' MINING INDUSTRY of the province of QUEBEC PROVINCE OF QUEBEC. CANADA DEPARTMENT OF MINES Honourable PAUL W. EARL, Minister P.-E. AUGER, Deputy Minister 4, THE MINING INDUSTRY OF THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC IN 1959 QUEBEC 1961 GM 67014 To the Honourable Paul W. Earl, Minister of Mines, Quebec, Que. Sir: I beg to submit herewith the report entitled "The Mining Industry of the Province of Quebec in 1959". This report contains a detailed account of mining operations and statistical data for the year 1959. This report has been prepared by the technical staff of the Department. The term "production", as used throughout this report, is synonymous with "quantity sold", "shipped" or "used", and does not necessarily represent "annual output". Unless otherwise noted, the ton specified in the text and tables of this report is that of 2,000 pounds. Values are given in Canadian funds. As it would be impractical to mention in this report all those who have contributed to the mineral production of the Province, a list of the "Principal Operators and Owners of Mines and Quarries in the Province of Quebec" is published separately and brought up to date when warranted by changes of names and addresses. In addition to this annual report on the mining industry, the Department issues a "General Report of the Minister of Mines" which deals mostly with administrative matters and covers the fiscal year ending on March 31st. In order to acquaint the public, as soon as pos- sible, with the state of the mining industry, the Department publishes at the beginning of each year an interim report summarizing the progress made by the industry during the year just ended.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Exploration 4.1 Introduction Targeted Commodities
    Photo: MERN CHAPTER 4 Mineral Exploration 4.1 Introduction Targeted commodities In 201512, roughly 200 mining companies reported exploration or deposit appraisal work in Québec as project operator. Exploration expenditures and investments amounted to nearly $221M (Figures 4.1 and 4.2). Junior companies continued to have difficulty financing their projects on the stock markets. Although spending by juniors had dropped by 30% in 2013, they have increased by 8% from 2014 to 2015. As in the past, exploration and deposit appraisal expenditures are largely focused on precious metals ($108M, 49%), ferrous metals ($58M, 26%) and base metals ($13M, 6%) (Table 4.1). The last few years have also seen a growing inte- rest for several commodities that Québec does not yet produce or only in small quantities. This is true for lithium, rare earth elements, diamonds, phosphate and graphite, which collectively reached a high of $150M in work expenditures in 2012, compared to a total of only $10M in the early 2000s. Nevertheless, the global stock market pullback had a negative effect on the level of investment for these new commodities. In Québec, expenditures fell from $150M in 2012 to $33M in 2015, a drop of 78%. The applications for these strategic commodities are diverse and growing, particularly in the high-tech and green technology sectors for products such as hybrid and electric cars, wind turbines and high-performance rechargeable batteries. According to preliminary data, exploration and deposit appraisal expenditures were down for a fourth consecutive year with a total of $221M. The year-to-year reductions observed in 2012 (26%), 2013 (38%), 2014 (17%) and 2015 (30%) are explained by lower stock market prices for certain commodities that led to worldwide financing difficulties in the industry.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOPHYSICAL REPORT PART I, GRASSET LAKE AREA Zs Pota.4)
    GM 29947 GEOPHYSICAL REPORT PART I, GRASSET LAKE AREA zs pota.4) SELCO MINING CORPORATION LIMITED • GEOPHYSICAL REPORT GRASSET LAKE AREA PART I Ministère des Pichesses Naturelles, Québec W. J. Anderson SERVICE DE LA Toronto, Ontario DOCUMENTAT NTECHNIQUE • 13 - A0 U 1974 . May, 1974. Date: No GM: SELCO MINING CORPORATION LIMITED GEOPHYSICAL REPORT GRASSET LAKE AREA INTRODUCTION During the period January to April, 1974, magnetic and electromagn._`_ic surveys were completed on 37 grids in Grasset Lake area. This report describes the results on 30 of those grids LOCATION &ACCESS The claim groups are located in the townships of Bapst, Ste. Helene, Subercase, Grasset, La Gauchetiere, and Daniel. Access to the souther part of the area is by winter roads sponsored by the Quebec Department of Natural Resources, which extend west from New Hosco, and northwest from mile 80 on Highway 61. Northern claim groups are best reached by float or ski-equipped aircraft from Matagami. GEOLOGY The geology of the area west of longitude 78°00' has been mapped at one inch to one mile and described by Remick (1969), and the reader is referred to this report for details. At the extreme eastern edge of the area, in Daniel Township, felsic ana intermediate volcanics which 2 • host the massive sulphide deposits of the Matagami camp either terminate or form the western closure of an anticline about the Bell River Complex (Sharpe, 1968). With the exception of the Allard River area towards Matagami, most of the geology of the area is only known in a general fashion, due to very limited outcrop exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunday Lake Property
    1997 SUMMARY EXPLORATION REPORT FOR THE CYPRUS CANADA INC SUNDAY LAKE PROPERTY Sunday Lake District, NE Ontario Manthet Township, NW Quebec NTS: 32L/3, 32L/4 B. Needham, Mark Ben March 1997 32L04SE0009 2 17530 SUNDAY LAKE 010 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY........................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................^ LOCATION AND ACCESS................................................................................................................2 CLAIMS AND OWNERSHIP..............................................................................................................2 PREVIOUS WORK............................................................................................................................3 REGIONAL GEOLOGY.....................................................................................................................4 PROPERTY GEOLOGY....................................................................................................................5 GEOPHYSICS...................................................................................................................................6 1997 EXPLORATION PROGRAM.....................................................................................................6 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................^
    [Show full text]
  • Fenelon Mining Project Preliminary Information
    REPORT NO. 161-08442-00 FENELON MINING PROJECT PRELIMINARY INFORMATION NOVEMBER 2016 FENELON MINING PROJECT PRELIMINARY INFORMATION Wallbridge Mining Company Limited Report Project no: 161-08442-00 Date: November 2016 – WSP Canada Inc. 152 Murdoch Avenue Rouyn-Noranda, QC J9X 1E2 CANADA Phone: +1 819 797-3222 Fax: +1 819 762-6640 www.wspgroup.com i SIGNATURES PREPARED BY Geneviève Godbout, M. Env. 2016-11-10 Project Manager REVIEWED BY Sylvie Baillargeon, M.E.I 2016-11-10 Biologist APPROVED BY Éric Gingras, Toxicology Diploma, M.Sc. 2016-11-10 Team Leader Earth Sciences The original of the technology-based document sent herewith has been authenticated and will be retained by WSP for a minimum of ten years. Since the file transmitted is now out of WSP’s control and its integrity can no longer be ensured, no guarantee may be given to by any modifications to be made to this document. Fenelon Mining Project WSP Wallbridge Mining Company Limited No 161-08442-00 November 2016 iii PRODUCTION TEAM WALLBRIDGE MINING COMPANY LIMITED President & CEO Marz Kord WSP CANADA INC. (WSP) Project Manager Éric Gingras Collaborators Geneviève Godbout Sylvie Baillargeon Cartographer Yvon Perrier Official Reference: WSP 2014. Fenelon Mining Project. Report produced for Wallbridge Mining Company Limited. 17 p. and appendices. Fenelon Mining Project WSP Wallbridge Mining Company Limited No 161-08442-00 November 2016 v TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 GENERAL INFORMATION .............................................................1 1.1 PROJECT PROPONENT ......................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Fénelon Gold Mining Project Project Notice Regulation
    Lively (Ontario) FÉNELON GOLD MINING PROJECT PROJECT NOTICE REGULATION RESPECTING THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW PROCEDURE ENV0975-1501-00_EN GCM Reference No.: 18-1235-0975 Prepared by: Valérie Fortin, Eng. OIQ No.: 5016764 GCM Consultants Émilie Bélanger, Project manager Verified by: GCM Consultants Revision Issue Date 00 FINAL 2019.06.21 FÉNELON GOLD MINING PROJECT PROJECT NOTICE WALLBRIDGE PROJECT TEAM – GCM CONSULTANTS Émilie Bélanger Project manager, revision Valérie Fortin, eng. Coordination, analysis and drafting Karine Gauthier-Hétu, M.Env. & M.I.E. Drafting and revision Réal Baribeau, eng. Drafting Philippe Charest-Gélinas, biologist Drafting Vanessa Millette, biologist Drafting Amélie Mondor Secretariat Moana Ladouceur Translation PROJECT TEAM – WALLBRIDGE MINING COMPANY LIMITED François Demers Vice President – Mining and Projects Lyne Thompson Environmental Coordinator Document: ENV0975-1501-00_EN | Project: 18-1235-0975 | GCM Consultants | 2 of 40 FÉNELON GOLD MINING PROJECT PROJECT NOTICE WALLBRIDGE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS ............................................................................................................................ 5 3.0 GENERAL PRESENTATION OF THE PROJECT .................................................................................................... 7 4.0 INFORMATION ACTIVITIES
    [Show full text]
  • Éditeur Officiel Du Québec
    0 0 3 1 © Québec Official Publisher Updated to March 1 2021 This document has official status. chapter C-61.1, r. 28 Regulation respecting beaver reserves W I Act respecting the conservation and development of wildlife L D(chapter C-61.1, s. 186.1). LC I1- F2D6 Ee1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cc. Oe1 m DIVISION I N ESTABLISHMENT OF RESERVES................................................................. 1 Sb Ee DIVISION II Rr REGULATION................................................................................................... 2 V3 A0 T, I O1 N8 —9 B9 E A V E R R E S E R V E S Updated to 0March 01 2021 © Québec Official3 1Publisher C-61.1, r. 28 / 1 of 6 WILDLIFE CONSERVATION — BEAVER RESERVES DIVISION I ESTABLISHMENT OF RESERVES 1. The following territories are recognized as beaver reserves: (a) Fort Georges Reserve: A territory of 34,150 mi2, bounded on the north by the parallel of latitude 55º30′, on the east by meridian 72º, on the south by the right shore of Fort-Georges River equally called Grande-Rivière and on the west by James Bay. (b) Vieux Comptoir Reserve: A territory of an area of 19,525 mi2, bounded on the north by Fort Georges Reserve; bounded on the east, by a line described as follows: starting from the intersection of the right shore of Fort-Georges River or Grande-Rivière with meridian 73º17′; thence, south 50º15′, west, 7.4 mi; thence, south 53º55′, east 10 mi; thence, south 27º55′, west, 4.4 mi; thence, south 88º20′ west, 11.6 mi; thence, south 18º45′ east, 5.7 mi; thence, south 67º30′ west, 15.2 mi; thence, south 87º40′
    [Show full text]