DOCSLIB.ORG

Subjects, Volumes 37– (1996– )

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Subjects, Volumes 37– (1996– ) SUBJECTS, VOLUMES 37– (1996– ) • Aaron 44.164ff • abandoned children 40.27 • abbreviations 42.97ff; 55.924ff • abduction of women 38.409ff; 41.377ff; 50.444ff; 59.437ff • abecedaria 55.52ff • abortion 40.26ff; 46.47ff; 53.742ff • abridgement 44.342ff; 45.311ff, 386ff; 56.336f • Abrocomas, Persian 60.167ff • St Acacius 40.357ff • Academy, Platonic 45.285ff; 52.477f; 57.454ff • Acastus 56.334ff • accents, Greek 52.240ff; 53.708ff; 57.482ff • accessus 44.418f • acclamations 59.295ff • Achaea, Augustan policy on 37.388f o Byzantine 57.191ff • Achaemenids 57.191ff; 58.177ff; 60.444ff • Achaeus, Seleucid 60.189f • Achilleid 40.269f, 282; 54.217f • Achilles 38.130ff, 226; 39.340; 54.61f o and Adam 61.160ff • Achilles Tatius 38.428; 41.379ff; 49.264ff; 57.1125ff • Achilles Tatius Astron. 53.18 • Acraephen 50.49ff; 58.198ff • Acraephia 41.208f; 50.49ff • Acragas 52.83ff • Acre (Ptolemais) 41.299f • Acropolis (Athens) 50.159ff; 51.363ff • Actian era 49.529f • acting 43.341ff; 46.13ff; 59.460ff • actors’ interpolations 42.314ff • actresses 41.184f; 59.460ff • Acts of Philip 95 40.280 • Adam 61.160ff • Adana 42.306 • adaptations, Roman 46.13ff, 175ff; 59.215ff • adultery 45.319; 59.446ff • adverbs 54.599ff • Aea 38.375ff • Aegeus 59.90ff • Aegimius 55.814ff • Aegina 50.490ff; 52.57ff • Aegosthena 41.57f • Aelian 56.334ff; 58.279ff o NA 61.130 o NA 16.20 40.341f, 350 o VH 14.13 47.62f o fr.10 37.340f • Aeneas 40.315; 53.1ff • Aeneas of Gaza 49.115f; 53.145ff • Aeneas Tacticus 42.247 o 4.8 37.338 o 10.23 58.284f • Aeolus, Aeolidae 41.204ff • aëres 55.489ff • Aeschines 40.180, 247 o 1 59.585f o 1.4f 48.25 o 2.70ff 47.284ff o 3 49.31ff; 59.109ff o 3.38ff 56.457f o 3.66ff 47.273ff • Aeschrion of Samos 39.147f • Aeschylus Ag. 43.348ff; 55.837ff o Ag. 1ff 50.461ff o Ag. 355ff 52.548 o Ag. 640ff 40.127 o Ag. 1417f 54.342ff o Ag. 1444ff 52.540ff o Ag. 1478ff 49.477ff o Ag. 1525 54.342ff o Cho. 46.249ff o Cho. 942ff 50.461ff o Eum. 1ff 39.126ff o Eum. 830ff 49.240 o Oresteia 51.202ff, 368f, 554ff o PV 47.121ff; 48.133ff o PV 460f 44.335 o Supp. 1018ff 51.552ff o influence of 43.391ff o mss. 41.123ff • Aesop 45.133, 235, 243; 52.540ff; 59.98f • aesthetics 47.257ff • Aethra 37.320ff • aetiology 48.405ff; 50.44ff; 53.443ff • Aetius medicus 53.742ff • Aetna 48.137; 59.199 • Aetolians, and Sparta 45.22ff • afterlife 47.389ff; 59.202ff • Agamemnon 49.159ff; 54.45ff; 61.85ff • Agapios of Manbij 60.436f • Agariste 54.313ff • Agathias Hist. 38.295ff; 44.283ff o Hist. 1.18.5 60.158ff o Hist. 2.1.2 41.258 o Hist. 2.30f 45.285ff • Agathocles, son of Lysimachus 47.135ff • Agathon, poet 37.209ff; 44.334ff; 47.63 • Agathos Daimon 55.396 • Agdistis 39.297ff • age categories 60.498ff • ager publicus 49.139ff • Ages of Man 47.26ff • Agesilaus of Sparta 58.525ff • Agesilaus II 54.45ff • Agia Marina, in Athens 45.91ff • Aglaonice of Thessaly 57.287f • Aglauros 37.109; 44.128ff • Agnonides of Athens 38.56 • Agora, Athenian 37.107ff; 54.527ff • agoranomoi 56.663ff • Agra(i) 43.219ff • agri deserti 44.69ff; 49.150f • agriculture 42.9ff, 127ff, 225ff; 44.69ff; 49.391ff, 535; 53.520ff; 56.18ff; 58.102ff o and myth 48.115ff o and politics 60.40ff • Agyrrhius of Athens 49.12ff • Ahhotep 42.26ff • Aion 53.353f • aischrologia 38.23ff • Akephaloi, Christians 39.169ff; 47.236 • Akephaloi, demons 40.99ff; 47.93f • Akhenaten 42.33f • Akkadian literature 45.131ff • Alabanda 58.47ff • Alalu 51.194f • Alans 44.296 • Albinus, Platonist 54.31f, 136ff; 59.680ff • Alcaeus fr.307 39.124ff o fr.335 52.45f o frr.346-347 52.46ff • Alcibiades 37.209, 230; 49.363ff; 57.21ff; 58.156ff, 287ff; 60.4 o and Persia 59.73ff o and Timon 42.151 • Alcibiades II 39.363ff • Alcidamas 56.12f • Alcides of Caunus 58.19ff • Alcinous, Platonist 59.680ff • Alcmaeonidae 41.211; 49.369f; 51.366ff; 54.313ff • Alcman 44.5ff; 53.420ff; 57.570f • Alcmene 41.199 • Aldine Press 43.175f, 405f; 46.395ff; 47.470ff; 60.718ff • Alesion 60.3ff • Aleuads 55.300ff • Alexander the Great 37.23ff; 39.243ff, 411ff; 40.303f; 42.255ff; 43.376f; 50.215ff, 565ff o army of 47.401ff; 48.39ff o Arrian on 51.613ff o in art 47.431ff o and Athens 55.176ff; 59.109ff o and Callisthenes 59.596ff o and Cratinus 58.542ff o Plutarch on 42.329ff; 54.45ff • Alexander IV 43.378ff • Alexander of Aphrodisias 44.416ff; 57.231ff • Ps.-Alexander of Aphrodisias 61.110ff • Alexander the Clerk 40.389 • Alexander Polyhistor 43.5ff, 391ff • Alexander Romance 40.263ff, 280; 50.175ff; 54.115ff; 56.679ff • Alexandria 43.149ff, 251; 46.231ff, 310ff; 47.180f, 431ff; 48.393ff; 49.113ff; 50.95ff; 53.145ff; 56.111ff • Alexandria by Granicus 39.262 • Alexandria by Issus 39.262 • Alexis comicus 38.49ff • Alexius I Comnenus 39.108ff; 40.387; 41.383; 55.440f • Alexius III Angelus 56.343ff • Alexius of Byzantium 59.714ff • Alexius Stoudites 54.293ff • Allat, goddess 40.235ff • allegory 44.163ff, 188ff; 45.223ff; 47.49, 54; 48.409; 49.435ff; 50.437ff; 54.212f; 56.80; 61.160ff • alliances 45.5ff; 54.352ff • allotment 43.249; 46.307 • Aloadae 44.165ff • allusion, literary 45.331ff; 46.175ff; 48.10ff; 49.257ff, 363ff; 50.63ff, 87ff; 53.420ff; 55.832ff; 59.215ff; 60.242; 61.287ff • Alphabetikon 37.286 • alphabetizing 42.323; 55.626ff • alphabets 55.52ff; 57.162ff • Alpheus, epigrammatist 50.69ff • Alpheus, river 59.179ff; 60.12ff • alytarchs 50.418 • Amastris 47.142ff • Amazons, and Alexander 42.339 • ambiguity, dramatic 48.237ff • Amiroutzes, Georgios 52.267ff • Ammianus Marcellinus 31.16.4ff; 37.259ff o 17.5.3 58.600 o on Arabs 37.270f • Ammonius, grammarian 61.27f • Ammonius Saccas 59.320, 324; 61.318ff • amnesty 51.254ff; 55.886ff • amoenitas 57.697 • Amorgos 41.58 • amphibious raids 42.236ff • Amphictyony, Delphian 42.44ff • Amphipolis 57.295ff • amphoras 53.525 • amulets 40.104; 46.47; 53.326ff; 57.136ff, 631ff; 61.62ff • Amyntas of Galatia 41.362ff • Ps.-Anacharsis 38.98f • anagnorisis 38.285ff • anagrapheis, Athenian 39.27ff • Ananias of Shirak 37.309f • anapaests 49.357ff • anaphora 46.127f • anaphora, liturgical 53.138ff • Anargyroi, church of 40.384ff • Anastasia, d. of Constantius I 38.200, 207 • Anastasian Wall 37.303f • Anastasius I 47.377ff, 455ff; 48.447ff • Anastasius Pers. Miracula 41.253 • Anastasius the Sinaite 42.290, 305 • Anatolia 41.225, 349ff; 53.645ff; 54.220ff; 55.353ff; 58.177ff • Anatolius of Beirut 58.104ff • Anatolius, mathematician 55.913ff • anatomy 54.698ff • Anaximenes Rh.Al. 1421ff 40.187f • Anazarbus 56.485ff • Ancyra 59.262ff • Andocides 1.77ff 55.884ff o 1.80 45.19 o 1.83f 56.34ff o 1.87f 46.372f; 57.268ff o 1.96ff 55.898ff o 3.12 45.19 o 3.24f 61.5 o Plutarch on 42.338 • St Andrew the Fool, Vita 40.360; 42.293, 302 • Andromache 41.155ff; 46.147ff • Andromachus of Neapolis 39.281 • Andronicus I 39.113 • Andronicus II 40.388; 61.412f • Andronicus III 40.266 • Androtion of Athens 47.31ff • anecdotes 42.330, 342f; 48.168ff; 50.543ff; 52.369ff, 473ff; 54.665ff, 748f • Anemoreia 38.270 • angels 46.79, 172; 51.157ff; 53.344ff • anger 44.175ff; 47.307ff • Ankhesenamun 42.35 • anklebones 40.338ff • Anna Comnena 53.192ff • Anna Perenna 47.87ff • antelope, Tibetan 40.331ff • Antenor 55.29ff • Anthemius of Antioch 42.302 • Anthemius of Nicomedia 42.307 • Anthesteria 49.232ff • Anth.Gr. 2 47.361ff; 48.452ff o 5.64 55.558ff o 5.94 39.139 o 5.132 40.317 o 6.149 59.211 o 6.324 54.270f o 6.351 50.379f o 7.146 54.208 o 7.256 42.196 o 7.272 50.384 o 7.345 39.147f o 7.517–525 59.202ff o 7.522 50.382ff o 7.557 50.384 o 7.659 48.29 o 9.100 50.69ff o 9.208 54.209 o 9.210 47.222 o 9.322-3 54.269f o 9.408 50.63ff o 9.421 50.71ff o 9.502 50.297ff o 9.528 50.298ff o 9.577 54.687ff o 9.656 48.448f o 10.71 47.20 o 11 52.632ff o 11.73 50.297 o 11.171 52.651 o 11.292 54.697 o 11.384 50.303ff o 12.6 53.687ff o 12.50 52.55f o 12.102 52.137ff o 15.12 57.713ff o 15.21ff 52.284ff o 16.32 44.97f o 16.48 55.226f o 16.282 50.306ff o and Meleager 50.193ff • anthologies 43.177ff, 243ff; 50.385ff; 51.167ff; 52.393ff; 53.852ff; 54.665ff, 748ff; 55.256ff; 56.10ff; 57.547ff; 61.85ff • Anthony of Novgorod 40.360ff • Antigonids, and Athens 49.53ff • Antigonus of Carystus 44.5ff • Antigonus Monophthalmus 39.6ff • Antioch, Byzantine 40.53ff; 41.183ff, 297; 46.240ff; 50.411ff; 52.435ff; 54.69ff • Antiochia Castellum 41.368 • Antiochia ad Cragum 41.368 • Antiochia Lamontis 41.368 • Antiochus, astronomer 41.79 • Antiochus of Commagene 41.366f • Antiope, heroine 41.198 • Antipater, brigand 38.117 • Antipater, general 56.689ff • Antipater of Thessalonica 50.63ff • Antiphon 41.317ff; 46.142 • antiquarian writings 47.31ff • antirrhesis 43.152ff; 55.444f • C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Die Quellen Für Die Nachrichten Der Alten Historiker Über Die Diadochenkämpfe Bis Zum Tode Des Eumenes Und Der Olympias
    XIX. Die quellen für die nachrichten der alten historiker über die Diadochenkämpfe bis zum tode des Eumenes und der Olympias. (S. oben μ. 305). II. 1. Die unruhen in Babylon. — Erste vertheilung der satrapien. Ueber die wirren in Babylon unmittelbar nacb Alexanders tode haben wir einen ausführlichen bericht nur von Curtius (X 6—10) und Justin (XIII 1—4). Vergleicht man zunächst die ansichten und vorschlage der feldherrn über die thronfolg·e, so stellt sich ein merkwürdiges verhältniss heraus. Uebergangen sind bei Justin Nearclius, Aristonus und Python. Was Justin ferner unter Melea- gers namen anführt, findet sich bei Curtius zum theil als Ptole- maeus ansiebt, zum theil als die Nearcbs. Es kommt hinzu, dass Meleagers worte bei Justin einen innereu Widerspruch tragen. Denn zuerst eifert Meleager ganz wie Nearclius bei Curtius dagegen, dass man auf einen könig warten solle, der erst noch geboren werden müsse, obgleich doch thronerben da wären *). Er stellt es dann frei, den söhn der Barsine, wie Nearclius bei Curtius, oder Arrhidaeus zu wählen. Weiterhin führt Meleager bei Justin als 1) JustÌD 2, 6 ñeque expectandum dum reges nascerentur, cum iam genitis uti licer et. Curt. 6, 11 expectari nondum ortum regem et qui iam sit, praeter iri, nec animis Macedonum convenire nec tempori rerum. Brought to you by | Brown University Rockefeller Library Authenticated | 128.148.252.35 Download Date | 6/12/14 11:56 PM Zur zeit der Diadoclieu. 489 jrruud zur Verwerfung des solines der Roxane seine persische ab- kunft an, oline dabei zu bedenken, dass dieser grund ebenso gegen den sobn der Barsine spricht.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Freed Athens? J
    Ancient Greek Democracy: Readings and Sources Edited by Eric W. Robinson Copyright © 2004 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd The Beginnings of the Athenian Democracv: Who Freed Athens? J Introduction Though the very earliest democracies lildy took shape elsewhere in Greece, Athens embraced it relatively early and would ultimately become the most famous and powerful democracy the ancient world ever hew. Democracy is usually thought to have taken hold among the Athenians with the constitutional reforms of Cleisthenes, ca. 508/7 BC. The tyrant Peisistratus and later his sons had ruled Athens for decades before they were overthrown; Cleisthenes, rallying the people to his cause, made sweeping changes. These included the creation of a representative council (bode)chosen from among the citizens, new public organizations that more closely tied citizens throughout Attica to the Athenian state, and the populist ostracism law that enabled citizens to exile danger- ous or undesirable politicians by vote. Beginning with these measures, and for the next two centuries or so with only the briefest of interruptions, democracy held sway at Athens. Such is the most common interpretation. But there is, in fact, much room for disagree- ment about when and how democracy came to Athens. Ancient authors sometimes refer to Solon, a lawgiver and mediator of the early sixth century, as the founder of the Athenian constitution. It was also a popular belief among the Athenians that two famous “tyrant-slayers,” Harmodius and Aristogeiton, inaugurated Athenian freedom by assas- sinating one of the sons of Peisistratus a few years before Cleisthenes’ reforms - though ancient writers take pains to point out that only the military intervention of Sparta truly ended the tyranny.
    [Show full text]
  • Seriously Playful: Philosophy in the Myths of Ovid's Metamorphoses
    Seriously Playful: Philosophy in the Myths of Ovid’s Metamorphoses Megan Beasley, B.A. (Hons) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Classics of The University of Western Australia School of Humanities Discipline of Classics and Ancient History 2012 1 2 For my parents 3 4 Abstract This thesis aims to lay to rest arguments about whether Ovid is or is not a philosophical poet in the Metamorphoses. It does so by differentiating between philosophical poets and poetic philosophers; the former write poetry freighted with philosophical discourse while the latter write philosophy in a poetic medium. Ovid, it is argued, should be categorised as a philosophical poet, who infuses philosophical ideas from various schools into the Metamorphoses, producing a poem that, all told, neither expounds nor attacks any given philosophical school, but rather uses philosophy to imbue its constituent myths with greater wit, poignancy and psychological realism. Myth and philosophy are interwoven so intricately that it is impossible to separate them without doing violence to Ovid’s poem. It is not argued here that the Metamorphoses is a fundamentally serious poem which is enhanced, or marred, by occasional playfulness. Nor is it argued that the poem is fundamentally playful with occasional moments of dignity and high seriousness. Rather, the approach taken here assumes that seriousness and playfulness are so closely connected in the Metamorphoses that they are in fact the same thing. Four major myths from the Metamorphoses are studied here, from structurally significant points in the poem. The “Cosmogony” and the “Speech of Pythagoras” at the beginning and end of the poem have long been recognised as drawing on philosophy, and discussion of these two myths forms the beginning and end of the thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Egypt Under the Ptolemies
    UC-NRLF $C lb EbE THE HISTORY OF EGYPT THE PTOLEMIES. BY SAMUEL SHARPE. LONDON: EDWARD MOXON, DOVER STREET. 1838. 65 Printed by Arthur Taylor, Coleman Street. TO THE READER. The Author has given neither the arguments nor the whole of the authorities on which the sketch of the earlier history in the Introduction rests, as it would have had too much of the dryness of an antiquarian enquiry, and as he has already published them in his Early History of Egypt. In the rest of the book he has in every case pointed out in the margin the sources from which he has drawn his information. » Canonbury, 12th November, 1838. Works published by the same Author. The EARLY HISTORY of EGYPT, from the Old Testament, Herodotus, Manetho, and the Hieroglyphieal Inscriptions. EGYPTIAN INSCRIPTIONS, from the British Museum and other sources. Sixty Plates in folio. Rudiments of a VOCABULARY of EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHICS. M451 42 ERRATA. Page 103, line 23, for Syria read Macedonia. Page 104, line 4, for Syrians read Macedonians. CONTENTS. Introduction. Abraham : shepherd kings : Joseph : kings of Thebes : era ofMenophres, exodus of the Jews, Rameses the Great, buildings, conquests, popu- lation, mines: Shishank, B.C. 970: Solomon: kings of Tanis : Bocchoris of Sais : kings of Ethiopia, B. c. 730 .- kings ofSais : Africa is sailed round, Greek mercenaries and settlers, Solon and Pythagoras : Persian conquest, B.C. 525 .- Inarus rebels : Herodotus and Hellanicus : Amyrtaus, Nectanebo : Eudoxus, Chrysippus, and Plato : Alexander the Great : oasis of Ammon, native judges,
    [Show full text]
  • İkinci Sofistik Dönem: Sofist, Retor Ve Filozofların Dini Görevleri 219
    cedrus.akdeniz.edu.tr CEDRUS Cedrus V (2017) 217-239 The Journal of MCRI DOI: 10.13113/CEDRUS/201711 İKİNCİ SOFİSTİK DÖNEM: SOFİST, RETOR VE FİLOZOFLARIN DİNİ GÖREVLERİ THE SECOND SOPHISTIC: RELIGIOUS OFFICIALS OF SOPHISTS, RHETORS, AND PHILOSOPHERS ∗ ELİF AKGÜN KAYA Öz: Edebi kaynaklar, epigrafik belgeler ve nümismatik Abstract: Literary sources, epigraphical documents, veriler İkinci Sofistik Dönem’de (MS I-III. yüzyıl) sofist, and numismatic evidence show that the sophists, rhe- retor ve filozofların mensubu oldukları aile ve aldıkları tors, and philosophers that belonged to the most pro- eğitim sonucunda, kamusal yükümlülükleri ait olduk- minent and the wealthiest families had an excellent ları toplumsal sınıf içinde dikkat çekici şekilde başarıyla education and so they officiated successfully many yerine getirdiklerini ve sahip oldukları parayı cömertçe public services and generously spent their money for kentleri için harcadıklarını göstermektedir. Bu kişiler the cities in the Second Sophistic Period (Ist to IIIrd cen- βούλαρχος, βουλευτής, γραμματεύς, στρατηγός, ἀρχιε- turies AD). They undertook important municipal ma- ρεύς, δᾳδοῦχος, ἱερεύς, ἱεροφάντης, νεωκόρος, νεοποι- gistracies such as βούλαρχος, βουλευτής, γραμματεύς, ός, περιθύτης, προφήτης, ἀγορανόμος, λογιστής ve τα- στρατηγός, ἀρχιερεύς, δᾳδοῦχος, ἱερεύς, ἱεροφάντης, μίας, γυμνασίαρχος, ἐφήβαρχος, ἀγωνοθέτης, εἰρήναρ- νεωκόρος, νεοποιός, περιθύτης, προφήτης, ἀγορανό- χος/εἰρηνάρχης, στεφανήφορος, πρύτανις/πρυτανάρχης μος, λογιστής ve ταμίας, γυμνασίαρχος, ἐφήβαρχος, gibi önemli kent görevlerini üstlenmişlerdir. Ayrıca ἀγωνοθέτης, εἰρήναρχος/εἰρηνάρχης, στεφανήφορος, eyalet düzeyinde ἀγωνοθέτης, ἀρχιερεύς/ἀσιάρχης ve πρύτανις/πρυτανάρχης. Also, it is documented that γαλατάρχης’lik gibi oldukça prestijli kamusal görevleri they took on quite prestigious provincial magistracies üstlendikleri de belgelenmektedir. Bu makalede ise İkin- such as ἀγωνοθέτης, ἀρχιερεύς/ἀσιάρχης, and γαλα- ci Sofistik Dönem’de sofist, retor ve filozofların kent- τάρχης.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleopatra II and III: the Queens of Ptolemy VI and VIII As Guarantors of Kingship and Rivals for Power
    Originalveröffentlichung in: Andrea Jördens, Joachim Friedrich Quack (Hg.), Ägypten zwischen innerem Zwist und äußerem Druck. Die Zeit Ptolemaios’ VI. bis VIII. Internationales Symposion Heidelberg 16.-19.9.2007 (Philippika 45), Wiesbaden 2011, S. 58–76 Cleopatra II and III: The queens of Ptolemy VI and VIII as guarantors of kingship and rivals for power Martina Minas-Nerpel Introduction The second half of the Ptolemaic period was marked by power struggles not only among the male rulers of the dynasty, but also among its female members. Starting with Arsinoe II, the Ptolemaic queens had always been powerful and strong-willed and had been a decisive factor in domestic policy. From the death of Ptolemy V Epiphanes onwards, the queens controlled the political developments in Egypt to a still greater extent. Cleopatra II and especially Cleopatra III became all-dominant, in politics and in the ruler-cult, and they were often depicted in Egyptian temple- reliefs—more often than any of her dynastic predecessors and successors. Mother and/or daughter reigned with Ptolemy VI Philometor to Ptolemy X Alexander I, from 175 to 101 BC, that is, for a quarter of the entire Ptolemaic period. Egyptian queenship was complementary to kingship, both in dynastic and Ptolemaic Egypt: No queen could exist without a king, but at the same time the queen was a necessary component of kingship. According to Lana Troy, the pattern of Egyptian queenship “reflects the interaction of male and female as dualistic elements of the creative dynamics ”.1 The king and the queen functioned as the basic duality through which regeneration of the creative power of the kingship was accomplished.
    [Show full text]
  • Resounding Mysteries: Sound and Silence in the Eleusinian Soundscape
    Body bar (print) issn 2057–5823 and bar (online) issn 2057–5831 Religion Article Resounding mysteries: sound and silence in the Eleusinian soundscape Georgia Petridou Abstract The term ‘soundscape’, as coined by the Canadian composer R. Murray Schafer at the end of the 1960s, refers to the part of the acoustic environment that is per- ceivable by humans. This study attempts to reconstruct roughly the Eleusinian ‘soundscape’ (the words and the sounds made and heard, and those others who remained unheard) as participants in the Great Mysteries of the two Goddesses may have perceived it in the Classical and post-Classical periods. Unlike other mystery cults (e.g. the Cult of Cybele and Attis) whose soundscapes have been meticulously investigated, the soundscape of Eleusis has received relatively little attention, since the visual aspect of the Megala Mysteria of Demeter and Kore has for decades monopolised the scholarly attention. This study aims at putting things right on this front, and simultaneously look closely at the relational dynamic of the acoustic segment of Eleusis as it can be surmised from the work of well-known orators and philosophers of the first and second centuries ce. Keywords: Demeter; Eleusis; Kore; mysteries; silence; sound; soundscape Affiliation University of Liverpool, UK. email: [email protected] bar vol 2.1 2018 68–87 doi: https://doi.org/10.1558/bar.36485 ©2018, equinox publishing RESOUNDING MYSTERIES: SOUND AND SILENCE IN THE ELEUSINIAN SOUNDSCAPE 69 Sound, like breath, is experienced as a movement of coming and going, inspiration and expiration. If that is so, then we should say of the body, as it sings, hums, whistles or speaks, that it is ensounded.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards
    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48303-2 — the Moon in the Greek and Roman Imagination Karen Ní Mheallaigh Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-48303-2 — The Moon in the Greek and Roman Imagination Karen ní Mheallaigh Index More Information Index Achilles’ shield. See Homer Callimachus, – Aëtius, – celestial bowls, – Aglaonice, – Cicero, Somnium Scipionis, –, , See Alcmaeon of Croton, , – selēnoskopia (or ‘view from Moon’) Alcman Cleomedes, , Partheneia (Maiden Songs), – cognitive estrangement. See selēnoskopia (view from Alexander of Abonouteichos, – Moon) amphiphōntes, Colin Webster, , – analogical drift, Corinna, – Anaxagoras of Clazomenae, , –, –, cup of Helios, – Cyrano de Bergerac, , n Anaximander of Miletus, – Anaximenes of Miletus, – Demetrius Triclinius, n, , – Ancient Greek calendar, See also parapēgmata Democritus of Abdera, –, Antiphanes of Berge, – Diogenes of Apollonia, antiphraxis, – dioptra. See Lucian, True Stories Antonius Diogenes, The incredible things beyond Thule earthshine, – and scholarly hoax, – Earthy Moon Theory (EMT), –, –, and the Arctic, – See Plutarch, De facie and the Moon, – problems/challenges, , – narrative complexity, – eclipse Apollo Noumēnios, lunar eclipse, – Apuleius mechanism of eclipse, – lunam despumari, – solar eclipse, , – Aristarchus of Samos, , Empedocles of Acragas, –, , – Aristotle Empedotimus, fire creatures on the Moon, – Endymiones, , – on nature of Moon, Ennius’ dream, – theory of elements, Epimenides of Crete, – Astraeus, Eratosthenes of Cyrene, astral travel. See soul projection Hermes. See selēnoskopia (or ‘view from astronomical observation, , See mountains Moon’) astronomy
    [Show full text]
  • Gregory Palamas at the Council of Blachernae, 1351 Papadakis, Aristeides Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1969; 10, 4; Proquest Pg
    Gregory Palamas at the Council of Blachernae, 1351 Papadakis, Aristeides Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Winter 1969; 10, 4; ProQuest pg. 333 Gregory Palamas at the Council of Blachernae, 1351 Aristeides Papadakis HE STORY of the last centuries of Byzantium is one of shrinking Tfrontiers and inevitable disintegration, graphically illustrated by the disasters of Manzikert (1071) and Myriocephalon (1176). The final disaster of 1453 only marks the end of a story the outcome of which had long been determined. Curiously enough, however, these years of increasing decay, when Byzantium proved Ha marvel of tenacity,"1 were also years of extraordinary vitality in such areas as Byzantine theology and art. The profound puzzle of cultural energy amidst political inertia and exhaustion is best illustrated by hesychasm -a movement long organic to Byzantine spirituality, but which first gained momentum with its first eminent exponent, Gregory Palamas, theologian and monk of Mount Athos, and subsequent archbishop of Thessalonica. Happily, confusion and obSCUrity no longer shroud the personality and achievement of Gregory Palamas. Recent research has shown that Pal amite theology-the cause celebre that shook the fabric of Byzantine society in the 1340s-constitutes an organic continuation of the strong biblical and patristic tradition of the Byzantine Church. The theology of Palamas is in no wayan innovative or heretical deviation from orthodoxy (and therefore of marginal importance as some have thought).2 No one has contributed more to making Palamas accessible 1 Cf. G. Ostrogorsky in CMedHI IV.l (Oxford 1968) 367; J. M, Hussey, "Gibbon Re­ written: Recent Trends in Byzantine Studies," in Rediscovering Eastern Christendom, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Starting with Anacreon While Preparing a Compendium of Essays on Sappho and Her Ancient Reception
    Starting with Anacreon while preparing a compendium of essays on Sappho and her ancient reception The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Nagy, Gregory. 2021.02.06. "Starting with Anacreon while preparing a compendium of essays on Sappho and her ancient reception." Classical Inquiries. http://nrs.harvard.edu/ urn-3:hul.eresource:Classical_Inquiries. Published Version https://classical-inquiries.chs.harvard.edu/starting-with-anacreon- while-preparing-a-compendium-of-essays-on-sappho-and-her- ancient-reception/ Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37367198 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Classical Inquiries Editors: Angelia Hanhardt and Keith Stone Consultant for Images: Jill Curry Robbins Online Consultant: Noel Spencer About Classical Inquiries (CI ) is an online, rapid-publication project of Harvard’s Center for Hellenic Studies, devoted to sharing some of the latest thinking on the ancient world with researchers and the general public. While articles archived in DASH represent the original Classical Inquiries posts, CI is intended to be an evolving project, providing a platform for public dialogue between authors and readers. Please visit http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.eresource:Classical_Inquiries for the latest version of this article, which may include corrections, updates, or comments and author responses. Additionally, many of the studies published in CI will be incorporated into future CHS pub- lications.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prosecutors of Socrates and the Political Motive Theory
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2-1981 The prosecutors of Socrates and the political motive theory Thomas Patrick Kelly Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Intellectual History Commons, and the Political History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Kelly, Thomas Patrick, "The prosecutors of Socrates and the political motive theory" (1981). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 2692. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.2689 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Thomas Patrick Kelly for the Master of Arts in History presented February 26, 1981. Title: The Prosecutors of Socrates and The Political Motive Theory. APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS CO~rnITTEE: ~~varnos, Cha1rman Charles A. Le Guin Roderlc D1man This thesis presents a critical analysis of the histor- ical roles assigned to the prosecutors of Socrates by modern historians. Ancient sources relating to the trial and the principles involved, and modern renditions, especially those of John Burnet and A. E. Taylor, originators of the theory that the trial of Socrates was politically motivated, are critically 2 analyzed and examined. The thesis concludes that the political motive theory is not supported by the evidence on which it relies. THE PROSECUTORS OF SOCRATES AND THE POLITICAL MOTIVE THEORY by THOMAS PATRICK KELLY A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in HISTORY Portland State University 1981 TO THE OFFICE OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH: The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Thomas Patrick Kelly presented February 26, 1981.
    [Show full text]