RESTRICTED Report No

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RESTRICTED Report No RESTRICTED Report No. PA-52a Public Disclosure Authorized This report was prepared for use within the Bank and its affiliated organizations. They do not accept responsibility for its accuracy or completeness. The report may not be published nor may it be quoted as representing their views. INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION Public Disclosure Authorized AGRICULTURAL SECTOR SURVEY BRAZIL (in four volumes) VOLUME III Public Disclosure Authorized ANNEXES 11 THROUGH 18, AND STATISTICAL ANNEX August 19, 1970 Public Disclosure Authorized Agriculture Projects Department TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. VOLUNT I (MAIN REPORT) PREFACE .................. ............................ SIt-!ARY ............................................... iv I. THE RECENT PERFORMANCE AND OUTLOOK ............... 1 Output and Exports ................................... 1 Sources of Growth ................. 5 The Resource Base ................................ 7 Forestry and Fisheries ..... ...................... 9 The Northeast ....... ............................. 10 II. PRICE AND COST FACTORS ............. .. ............ 12 Land ............ 12 The Price of Farm Finance .................... .... 14 Taxes ............................................ 15 Product Pricing and Marketing .................. .. 17 Input Prices and Distribution ................ ... 19 III. PUBLIC EXPENDITURES .............................. 21 Grain Storage .... 21 Land and Water Development ..... .................. 21 Research ......................................... 23 Extension ........................................ 25 Seed Production and Multiplication ............... 27 Transportation ................................... 28 IV. CRISIS IN COFFEE? ....... .*... # .............. 30 The Outlook for Supply ..... ...................... 30 Irrigation ................................................. 31 V. THE RURAL UNDERPRIVILEGED ..... ................... 33 The Demand for Labor ...... ....................... 33 Land Tenure and Tenancy ...... .................... 35 VI. GOVERNNENT ORGANIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING . 38 The Public Servicesrto Agriculture ...... .......... 38 Planning ..... ....................................... 39 Preinvestment Studies .............. .. ............ 40 ANNEX 11 CROPS OTHER THAN COFFEE This Annex discusses some of the more important technical and economic phenomena which affect the outlook for higher yields and expanded output of the main crops. Maize Maize accounts for about 9 percent of the gross value of agricul- tural production, occupies some 9.5 million hectares or 25 percent of the total cultivated land, and is grown in all states. Minas Gerais, Sao Paulo, Parana, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul provide 65 percent of the total maize area and more than 70 percent of the production. The crop is normally grown rainfed in upland areas as a single crop, with yields rang- ing from about 850 kilograms per hectare in the northeast to over 1,500 kilo- grams per hectare in the center south. Production has increased from an annual level of slightly above nine million tons in 1961-1964 to over 12 million tons in 1967-1968 (drought in 1969 caused reductions in yields). Growth in output has been achieved largely through expansion of area cropped. This will continue in some states, but high yielding varieties and improved agronomic practices, notably sole cropping with closer spacing and fertili- zer, are becoming more important. The demand for corn for feed for the expanding poultry and pig industries has been strong, and will continue to grow rapidly. The pig industry, presently extensive and lard-oriented, will shift to more effi- cient meat-type hogs and intensive production methods. This could lead to a reduction in the price of pork relative to beef and a stronger demand for pork. This means an increased domestic demand for maize. Maize exports averaged US$27 million (540,000 tons) per year in the 1965-1967 period. A major constraint on exports has been inadequate storage and handling facilities in main producing areas and at the ports. These inadequacies have led to sharp seasonal and inter-year variations in the price of maize, and have greatly retarded maize expansion. Given im- provements in these bottlenecks, it is feasible to increase maize area from the 1968 level of 9.5 million hectares to 10.2 million hectares in 1975 to 11.2 million hectares in 1979 or 1980. This is a 17.5 percent expansion in the decade. The average yield can be raised from 1.5 tons per hectare to 2.2 tons hectare by 1980 if efforts are intensified on research, seed production and extension, particularly in the south of the woodland savan- nah region. 1/ _/ See Richard Wheeler, Production and Export of Corn and Rice in Brazil - Prospects for the 1970's, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Economic Report No. 54, September 1969. ANNEX 11 Page 2 Rice About 7,0 percent of the output of 6.7 million tons in 1968 was produced in Minas Gerais, Sao Paulo, Goias, Parana and Rio Grande do Sul. These states accounted for 70 percent of the 4.5 million hectares planted to rice in that:year. The state of Maranhao in northeast Brazil produced over 700,000 tonsion some 550,000 hectares (13 percent of the total national area under rice')., Rice area increased from two million hectares iii 1950 to 4.5 million h,ectares in 1968. This is almost wholly responsible for the increased.output. Rio Grande do Sul uses irrigated lowland gsolls for rice; elsewhere,,~Production is mainly rainfed. In Rio Grande do :;ul, aver- age vields i-ncredsed from two tons to about 2.8 tons between 1950 anld 3968, but in other areas they have remained at between 1.2 and 1.5 tons per hec- tare. Upl-and varieties responsive to fertilizers are lacking, and rice is often planted as the first crop on newly cleared land, witlhout fertilizer and with. poor husbandry practices. Brazililan plant breeders have not yet developed high yielding rice varieties, despite the importation and testing of a wide range of genetic material. i4lore intensiv:e agronomic renearch efforts are required, along with agro-economic studies to determine optimal cultivation te,zh- niques. The problems are severe. For example, in Rio Grande do Sul, poor water control, drainage and the grass weed hold yields down. The soils are heavy cracking clays and after one or two years of rice the only economic means of controlling grass weeds is by extensive cattle grazing. After several years the grass weeds are then sufficiently reduced by in- terspecies competition to permit another crop or two of rice. This system could be much improved by replacing the present tumble-down weed grass fallows with short term, planted grass/legume pastures fertilized with superphosphate. Research along these lines is essential. Another aspect of the outlook for rice involves the Pantanal area of Mato Grosso. Promising results are being obtained by farmers using low cost pump irrigation in the Pantanal where there are large areas of river flood plains and climatic conditions apparently suitable for double cropping with rice. The area may have interesting possibili- ties for large-scale rice production projects. On balance, there are prospects for considerable increases in rice production and exports in the next ten years. Area can increase from about 4.5 million hectares in 1968 to 4.95 million hectares in 1975 to about 5.2 million hectares in 1980. Yields can be increased by greater intensity of cropping in established areas, by heavier use of fertilizer and other inputs, and perhaps by opening up highly productive areas under low cost irrigation, as mentioned above. These developments could result in an increase in average yields from the present 1.5 tons of paddy per hectare to 1.8 tons per hectare in 1975 to 2.3 tons per hectare in 1980. The supply available for export would then be 600,000 tons in 1975, and 1.9 million.tons:in 1980 (probably worth about US$190 million). ANNEX 11 Page 3 Beans In 1968, with over 3.5 million hectares in beans (mainly Phaseolus Spp.) and a crop of 2.4 million tons, all for the domestic market, Brazil was the world's largest producer and consumer of beans. Production increased about 4 percent annually over the period 1950-68, mainly owing to expanded plantings. Beans are cultivated in association with other crops, especially maize, and generally are poorly tended. Yields are around 700 kilograms per hectare. Studies of crop associations and the establishment of economically optimal levels of manuring for the associated crops are needed. New varie- ties are likely to be resisted by consumers, but nonetheless merit emphasis. Groundnuts over 90 percent of area and production, estimated at 653,000 hec- tares and 770,000 tons of nuts in shell respectively in 1968, is in the centre south states. Area sown has increased at less than 3 percent annually since 1950, all in the north and northeastern regions, where average yields are about one-third of the 1,000 kilograms level reached in Minas Gerais, Sao Paulo and Parana. Almost all the crop is crushed to produce oil for domestic consumption, but a substantial proportion (estimates vary from 45 to 90 percent) of the meal and cake byproducts is exported. The Secretariat of Agriculture of Sao Paulo reports that profit from groundnuts has remained at a high level relative to other crops, in- cluding coffee, for the past 10 years. In 1968-69, for example, at over US$115 per hectare, groundnuts were six times more profitable
Recommended publications
  • Monetary and Fiscal Policies of Brazil, 1953-1963
    MONETARY AND FISCAL POLICIES OF BRAZIL 1953-1963 By JAMES HENDERSON DUKES A DISSEHTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE COUNCIL OF THE UNH'ERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1968 Copyright by James Oaxidarson Dukes 1966 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Aa most of the nacessax*y Information for this dissertation perfoz*oe comes from a foreign country, 1 find that there are several persons or organizations that should be thanked for their assistance. Without the aid x»ecelved, much of the resesu*ch material used would have been neither primary nor current. First, I would like to thank the Library of Congress for the extensive use of their facilities. Also very im- portant were the assistance of the staffs of the Brazilian Qnbassies in v/ashlngton, D. C., and in Tegucigalpa, Honduras, and the use of the library of the International Monetary Fund in Washington, D. C. I am indeed thankful for the assistance given me by Gertrude Heare of the TJhited States Department of Commerce in allowing me to borrow ’’the only available copy" of the 1964*’1966 development plan, which was replete with pertinent statistics and projections. And finally, I must show more than appreciation for the tremendous amount of assistance from my wife in the fora of preliminary and final typing, editing, and en- couragement throughout the whole period, from research to completion of the work. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 PART I. INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE Chapter 1. THE BANKING SYSTEM I 5 2. THE TAX SYSTEM 3 .
    [Show full text]
  • Estado, Planejamento, Gestão E Desenvolvimento
    Documento de projeto Estado, planejamento, gestão e desenvolvimento Balanço da experiência brasileira e desafios no século XXI José Celso Cardoso Jr. Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe (CEPAL) Este documento foi preparado por José Celso Cardoso Jr., Economista pela Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo (FEA/USP), com mestrado em Teoria Econômica e doutorado em Economia Social e do Trabalho, ambos pelo Instituto de Economia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas (IE/UNICAMP). Desde 1996 é Técnico de Planejamento e Pesquisa do Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA), tendo sido Diretor de Estudos e Políticas do Estado, das Instituições e da Democracia (DIEST/IPEA) e Diretor de Planejamento, Monitoramento e Avaliação do PPA 2012-2015, na Secretaria de Planejamento e Investimentos Estratégicos (SPI) do Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão (MPOG), Governo Federal, Brasil. O documento foi elaborado no marco das Primeiras Jornadas de Planejamento Econômico e Social 2013, organizadas pelo Instituto Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Planejamento Econômico e Social (ILPES). A revisão e preparação de todos os trabalhos foi levada a cabo por Paulina Pizarro, sob a coordenação geral de René A. Hernández. Agradecem-se os comentários e o apoio do comitê liderado por Jorge Máttar, Diretor do ILPES, e integrado por Rudolf Buitelaar, René A. Hernández, Luis Miguel Galindo, Eduardo Aldunate, Luis Mauricio Cuervo, Sergio González, Juan Francisco Pacheco, Daniel Perrotti, Luis Riffo, Carlos Sandoval, Alicia Williner e Lucy Winchester. As opiniões aqui expressas são de inteira responsabilidade do autor, não refletindo, necessariamente, a posição da CEPAL. Este documento não foi submetido à revisão editorial.
    [Show full text]
  • Usam Ni Anaai~
    -cI )V Z'j Jt A-,IonIN i 7/- I / LIMIT DISTRIBUTION The distribution of this document is controlled and its contents may not be L 4'~~ ( discussed with unauthorized persons. I, 9 ;, '~'~' P C o0 east eS~tudy ri,4~kvpfFM' iZT EIT usam nianaai~ I, j :1 ~ K;~ NOVEMBER 25, 1963 I XzcQL-v 14 ~ RIO DE JANEIRO - RECIFE Ask C' '-V 'i. t j _ ­ q n p ' F - 3 p CI A L gORTREAST STUDy a 5)3. - - I'- November 25, 1963 -4 Rio de Janeiro Re oife Reoaie Group' 3 &,/6/­ Downgrade 1 2 4 at -Year intervals; not automatically declassiiea LIMITED OFFICIAL USE November 25, .1963 INTRODUCTORY MEMORANDUM Subject: Special Northeast Study. This is ai2 advance "dqvaft" copy of the Special Northeast Study just completed by USAID/Brazil. It does not represent an officially cleared document and final approved copies will be distributed later. In the meantime, however, it has been decided to make a limited distribution of the study in its present form in order to facilitate comments and suggestions and to serve as valuable background information for current .discussions of important USAID/Brazil program matters. The decision to undertake this study was made some months ago. It was clear that an over-all review was desirable and would assist the Mission greatly in the preparation of its FY 1965 Country Assistance Program proposals for Brazil. Such a-study would also serve as important background in helping to prepare various elements of the U.S. Government for the joint review early in 1964 called for by the Northeast Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • CHANGES in AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION in Brazil, 1947-65
    ,CHANGES IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION IN' BRAZIL, 1947-65. (Foreign 'Al!.ricultural Economic R~gort.Y. / J,.o.uis F. Herrm.;;mn. Was,hington, DC: Economic Research Service. Jun~ :~972,~" (NAL Call No. A281 .•'9/Ag8Fl 1 .0 :; \\\\\2.8 \\\\\2.5 D~ III~ 3.~.. 111112.2 11111 :~ ~II~ 1II11~-·= \I\\I~ t I!& •.: \\\\\~ IIIII 1.4 11111 \.6 FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC REPORT NO.79 <:hanges In Agricultural Production In Brazi'l, 1947-65 c· ! , i ECON 0 MIe RES EAR CH SE R V ICE • u. S. DE PAR TM E t.~T 0FAG RIC Ul TU R E <p ABSTRACT Brazil increased agricultural output about 4.5 pel'cent a year from 1947 to 1965, mainly by expanding the cultivated area, but it has the potential to double the area cultivated: Agricultural production greW lllorC rapidly thali popu larion in the 1950's and 1960's, but crop yields remained low and traditional practiccs were followed with low levels of fertilization. Human labor is the ()l1h source of power on three-fourths of the farms. Agricultural output increased rapidly enough to mcet rising dcmands for farm products resulting from population and income growth and to permit some exports. Agriculture klS remained the principal economic activity and source of foreign exchat;lge earnings jn Brazil with coffce being the major expOtt. The agricultural labor force r{)se about 2 pcrcent a year, and output per fannworker rose almost as fast. Keywords: Brazil, Economic growth al1d agriculture, '\gricultul'ul productivity, Techno­ logical progress. \1 CHANGES IN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION IN BRAZil, 1947-65 'I by Louis F.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideas, Policy Entrepreneurs, And
    ENERGY REVOLUTION: IDEAS, POLICY ENTREPRENEURS, AND INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE IN BRAZIL FOLLOWING THE 1973 OIL CRISIS by Liliana Paola Diaz Barrrera A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland May, 2018 © Liliana Diaz 2018 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT This research focuses on the role of ideas in policymaking. It examines the Brazilian energy policy response to the 1973 oil crisis. Today, Brazil is the 10th largest energy producer in the world with a diversified and clean energy matrix. In the early 1970s, it was an energy poorcountry highly dependent on imported oil supplies to fuel an aggressive industrialization process. How did Brazil manage to transform its energy profile? To answer this question, I argue that it is necessary to study the policymaking process that led to the adoption of energy diversification policies in 1974-75. Structural, exogenous, institutional, and ideational factors affected the policymaking process and thus the resulting policies. Although structural and exogenous factors played important catalyst and enabling roles, I argued that four old Developmentalist ideas, namely, 1) national development through industrialization; 2) energy as a growing point for the economy; 3) self-sufficiency; and 4) technological autonomy recombined by able policy entrepreneurs who acted through centralized institutions and through the creation of new institutions explain the policy course adopted by Brazil in the energy sector. The result was revolutionary or transformational change in the Brazilian energy sector. The research contributes to explaining the role and impact of ideas in effecting institutional change in a less developed and authoritarian setting and in doing so, fills a knowledge gap in the academic literature on Brazil with respect to its energy sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics de Paiva Abreu, Marcelo Working Paper The Brazilian economy, 1928-1980 Texto para discussão, No. 433 Provided in Cooperation with: Departamento de Economia, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro Suggested Citation: de Paiva Abreu, Marcelo (2000) : The Brazilian economy, 1928-1980, Texto para discussão, No. 433, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), Departamento de Economia, Rio de Janeiro This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/175937 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu 1 DEPARTAMENTO DE ECONOMIA PUC-RIO TEXTO PARA DISCUSSÃO No. 433 The Brazilian Economy, 1928-19801 Marcelo de Paiva Abreu2 NOVEMBRO 2000 1 This is first draft of the chapter on the Brazilian economy 1928-1980 to be included in volume IX of the Cambridge History of Latin America edited by Leslie Bethell.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Economy for a New Era: Elements for Building a More Efficient and Resilient Economy in Brazil Coordination
    A NEW ECONOMY FOR A NEW ERA: ELEMENTS FOR BUILDING A MORE EFFICIENT AND RESILIENT ECONOMY IN BRAZIL COORDINATION PARTNERS FINANCIAL SUPPORT NEW ECONOMY FOR BRAZIL This study pinpoints policies that can help reduce poverty and inequality, contribute to the achievement of economic and sectoral goals, stimulate sustainable economic growth and make Brazil more resilient to future pandemics and other risks, such as climate change and ecosystem destruction. This document is, first of all, a summary of the latest economic data on measures to meet these goals, as Brazil, like many countries, seeks opportunities to boost Authors economic growth, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. In alphabetical order: Ana Cristina Barros, Andrea Bassi, The study was developed in two complementary André F. P. Lucena, André Luiz Andrade, Alexandre Szklo, parts. Initially, a thorough literature review was Berta Pinheiro, Bruno Cunha, Carolina Genin, Fábio da conducted, analyzing the benefits and opportunities of Silva, Gerd Angelkorte, José Feres, Leonardo Garrido, policies in three main sectors: infrastructure, industry Rafael Feltran-Barbieri, Rafael Garaffa, Rogério Studart, and agriculture. Then, based on economic modeling, Roberto Schaeffer, Sebastian Keneally, Viviane Romeiro. new results are identified should measures to support the transition to a low-carbon economy be adopted. In addition, the study presents evidence showing that by Research coordinator mainstreaming sustainability as a cross-cutting policy in Viviane Romeiro the planning and implementation of related investment decisions, Brazil could benefit from trends in the financial markets and widen access to private finance. Reviewers How and when Brazil builds a more efficient, resilient, The authors would like to thank the experts who reviewed fair, and sustainable economy will be a decision taken this study at different stages throughout its development by each facet of the Brazilian society.
    [Show full text]