DOCSLIB.ORG

Not for Release, Publication Or Distribution in the United States of America, Australia, Canada Or Japan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Not for Release, Publication Or Distribution in the United States of America, Australia, Canada Or Japan Not for release, publication or distribution in the United States of America, Australia, Canada or Japan Press release Hilversum, 22 November 2005 Endemol N.V. announces Offer Price and Number of Shares Offered in its Initial Offering of Ordinary Shares • Endemol N.V. (the “Company”) announced today that the subscription period for institutional investors for the initial offering (the “Offering”) of ordinary shares of the Company (the “Shares”) ended on 21 November 2005 at 5.00 p.m. (CET). • Based on interest from investors, the Company, Endemol Investment B.V. (the “Selling Shareholder”), Merrill Lynch International (the “Global Coordinator and Lead Bookrunner”) and ABN AMRO Rothschild and Credit Suisse First Boston (Europe) Limited (collectively, the ‘‘Joint Bookrunners’’ and, together with the Global Coordinator and Lead Bookrunner and the other managers in the Offering, the “Banks”) have agreed on the final terms of the Offering, including the initial offering price per Share (the “Offer Price”) and the number of Shares offered: — Offer Price: EUR 9.00 per Share. — Number of Shares Offered: 27,901,786 existing Shares (constituting 22.3% of the issued share capital of the Company (currently consisting of 125,000,000 Shares)). • In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Offering, the Selling Shareholder has granted to the Banks an option exercisable, in whole or in part, by Merrill Lynch International on behalf of the Banks, within 30 days of the commencement of trading of the Shares on Euronext Amsterdam N.V.’s Eurolist by Euronext, to purchase an additional 3,348,214 Shares representing 12.0% of the number of Shares offered in the Offering to cover over-allotments, if any, and short positions resulting from stabilisation transactions. • Trading of the Shares on Eurolist by Euronext is expected to commence on an as-if-when- issued basis on or about 12:30 p.m. on 22 November 2005. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE OR FORM ANY PART OF ANY OFFER OR INVITATION TO SUBSCRIBE FOR, UNDERWRITE OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRE, OR ANY SOLICITATION OF ANY OFFER TO PURCHASE OR SUBSCRIBE FOR, SECURITIES INCLUDING IN THE UNITED STATES, AUSTRALIA, CANADA, OR JAPAN. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS NOT FOR PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION INTO THE UNITED STATES, AUSTRALIA, CANADA, OR JAPAN. NEITHER THIS ANNOUNCEMENT NOR ANY COPY OF IT MAY BE TAKEN OR DISTRIBUTED OR PUBLISHED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN THE UNITED STATES, AUSTRALIA, CANADA, OR JAPAN OR DISTRIBUTED TO U.S. PERSONS. THE MATERIAL SET FORTH HEREIN IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT INTENDED, AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED, AS AN OFFER OF SECURITIES FOR SALE INTO THE UNITED STATES OR ANY OTHER JURISDICTION. SECURITIES MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD IN THE UNITED STATES ABSENT REGISTRATION UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION. THE SECURITIES OF THE COMPANY DESCRIBED HEREIN HAVE NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE SO REGISTERED. THERE WILL BE NO PUBLIC OFFER OF SECURITIES IN THE UNITED STATES, AUSTRALIA, CANADA, OR JAPAN. THIS PRESS RELEASE IS ONLY DIRECTED, AND ANY OFFERING WILL ONLY BE DIRECTED, TO INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS. THIS PRESS RELEASE DOES NOT FORM PART OF ANY PROSPECTUS AND HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED BY THE NETHERLANDS AUTHORITY FOR THE FINANCIAL MARKETS, WHICH IS THE DUTCH COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF RELEVANT IMPLEMENTING MEASURES UNDER DIRECTIVE 2003/71/EC (THE “PROSPECTUS DIRECTIVE”) IN THE NETHERLANDS. PROSPECTUS DATED 10 NOVEMBER 2005 (Incorporated in the Netherlands) Offer of ordinary shares with a nominal value of EUR 0.10 per Share This prospectus relates to the initial offering of ordinary shares (the “Shares”) of Endemol N.V. (the “Company”), a naamloze vennootschap organised under the laws of the Netherlands. On behalf of Endemol Investment B.V., our sole shareholder (the “Selling Shareholder”), we are offering a certain number of Shares, constituting a minority interest in the Company, to be determined as set out below, held by the Selling Shareholder, in a global offering (the “Offering”) consisting of (i) an offering to institutional investors outside the United States, Canada, Japan and Australia in reliance on Regulation S (“Regulation S”) under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and (ii) an offering to qualified institutional buyers (“QIBs”) within the United States in reliance on Rule 144A (“Rule 144A”) under the Securities Act. The Shares are being offered, as specified in this prospectus, subject to prior sale and withdrawal, cancellation or modification of such offer without notice and subject to certain other conditions. This document comprises a prospectus relating to the Company in the form of a single document within the meaning of Article 3 of the Directive 2003/71/EC (the “Prospectus Directive”). This prospectus has been approved by the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (the “AFM”), which is the Dutch competent authority for the purpose of relevant implementing measures in the Netherlands. Prior to the Offering there was no public market for the Shares. Application has been made by us to list all of our Shares on Euronext Amsterdam N.V.’s Eurolist by Euronext (“Eurolist by Euronext”) (the “Admission”). Prospective investors may subscribe for the Shares for a period which is expected to commence on or about 10 November 2005 at 8.00 a.m. (CET) and is expected to end on or about 21 November 2005 at 5.00 p.m. (CET) (the “Subscription Period”). It is currently estimated that the initial offering price per Share (the “Offer Price”) will be between EUR 8.80 and EUR 12.80. The Offer Price and the number of Shares offered will be determined by us, the Selling Shareholder, the Lead Bookrunner and the Joint Bookrunners after termination of the Subscription Period on or about 22 November 2005 based on interest from investors and will be announced in a press release. The date on which trading of the Shares on Eurolist by Euronext will commence (the “Listing Date”) is expected to be on or about 22 November 2005. Payment for and delivery of the Shares is expected to be made on or about 25 November 2005 (the “Closing Date”). INVESTING IN THE SHARES INVOLVES RISKS. SEE “RISK FACTORS” BEGINNING ON PAGE 9 OF THIS PROSPECTUS FOR A DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC AND MATERIAL RISKS TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN CONSIDERING WHETHER TO INVEST IN THE SHARES. As the Shares will be listed and traded on Eurolist by Euronext on an “as-if-and-when-issued” basis, as of the Listing Date until the envisaged Closing Date, Euronext Amsterdam N.V. (“Euronext”) may annul all transactions effected in the Shares if the Shares are not delivered on the envisaged Closing Date. The Selling Shareholder will grant to the Managers (as defined below) an option exercisable, in whole or in part, by Merrill Lynch International on behalf of itself and each of the other managers in the Offering (the “Managers”) within 30 days of the commencement of trading of the Shares on Eurolist by Euronext, to procure purchasers for, or failing which, to purchase additional Shares representing 12% of the number of Shares to be offered in the Offering to cover over-allotments, if any, and short positions resulting from stabilisation transactions. The Shares have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act and may not be offered or sold within the United States except to QIBs in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by Rule 144A, or outside the United States in compliance with Regulation S. For a description of certain restrictions on transfer see “Transfer and Selling Restrictions”. Global Coordinator and Lead Bookrunner Merrill Lynch International Joint Bookrunners ABN AMRO Rothschild Credit Suisse First Boston 5IF1PXFSPG &NPUJPO IMPORTANT INFORMATION PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD READ THE ENTIRE PROSPECTUS AND, IN PARTICULAR, “RISK FACTORS” BEGINNING ON PAGE 9 OF THIS PROSPECTUS WHEN CONSIDERING AN INVESTMENT IN THE COMPANY. No person has been authorised to give any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this prospectus and, if given or made, such information or representations must not be relied on as having been authorised by us or the Managers. The contents of this prospectus are not to be construed as legal, financial or tax advice. Each prospective investor should consult his, her or its own legal adviser, independent financial adviser or tax adviser for legal, financial or tax advice. Apart from the responsibility and liabilities, if any, which may be mandatorily imposed on them by the AFM or the regulatory regime in the Netherlands, neither the Managers nor the Selling Shareholder accept responsibility whatsoever for the contents of this prospectus nor for any other statement made or purported to be made by any of them or on their behalf in connection with us, the Selling Shareholder or the Shares. The Managers and the Selling Shareholder accordingly disclaim all and any liability whether arising in tort or contract (save as referred to above) which they might otherwise have in respect of this prospectus or any such statement. The distribution of this prospectus and the offer of the Shares in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law and therefore persons into whose possession this prospectus comes should inform themselves about and observe any such restrictions, including those set out in the section “Transfer and Selling Restrictions”. Any failure to comply with these restrictions may constitute a violation of the securities laws of any such jurisdiction. In connection with the Offering, Merrill Lynch International, as stabilising manager, or any of its agents, may (but will be under no obligation to), to the extent permitted by law, over-allot or effect other transactions which stabilise or maintain the market price of the Shares or any options, warrants or rights with respect to, or interests in, the Shares, in each case at a higher level than might otherwise prevail in the open market.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fiona Donovan APDG Production Design Art Direction
    Fiona Donovan APDG production design art direction m 0419 200 710 e [email protected] www.fionadonovan.com EDUCATION National Institute of Dramatic Arts 1990-92 Diploma Dramatic Art - Design University of Canberra 1987-89 Bachelor of Applied Science Environmental Design: Architecture AWARDS AND NOMINATIONS 2016 AACTA AWARD FOR DESIGN ON A TELEVISION SERIES AWARD A Place to Call Home Series 5 Episode 2 Fallout AUSTRALIAN PRODUCITON DESIGN GUILD - DESIGN ON TV SHOW NOMINATION A Place to Call Home Series 4 Episode 2 Fallout 2015 AACTA AWARD FOR DESIGN ON A TELEVISION SERIES NOMINATION A Place to Call Home Series 4 Episode 2 A Nagging Doubt TELEVISION 2017 A PLACE TO CALL HOME SERIES 6 Seven Network for Foxtel Production Designer E.P. Chris Martin Jones 2017 A PLACE TO CALL HOME SERIES 5 Seven Network for Foxtel Production Designer E.P. Chris Martin Jones 2016 A PLACE TO CALL HOME SERIES 4 Seven Network for Foxtel Production Designer E.P. Chris Martin Jones 2015 A PLACE TO CALL HOME SERIES 3 Seven Network for Foxtel Production Designer E.P. Chris Martin Jones 2014 HIDING Prod. Designer Elizabeth Moore Art Director Line Producer Dianna Haddon Playmaker/ ABC 2013 A PLACE TO CALL HOME SERIES 2 Production Designer Tim Ferrier Art Director E.P. Chris Martin Jones LOVE CHILD SERIES 1 Production Designer Tim Ferrier Art Director E.P. Tom Hoffie & Sue Seeary 2012 HOOPLA DOOPLA Director Mark Banard Production Designer Producer Melinda Wearne & Ron Saunders A PLACE TO CALL HOME SERIES 1 Production Designer Tim Ferrier Art Director E.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Een Consumentenonderzoek Naar Tv-Inbelspelletjes
    “Ook Belazerd?” Een consumentenonderzoek naar tv-inbelspelletjes Tweede-Kamerfractie SP Rotterdam, april 2001 Inhoud Voorwoord 3 Samenvatting en aanbevelingen 4 1 Consumentenonderzoek ‘Actie Belspel’ 6 1.1 Doorgestoken kaart: het inbelcircus 6 1.2 Inbellen: de aantallen, de techniek, de inkomsten 7 2 Actie Belspel: reacties 10 2.1 Prijs nooit gehad: 5% 10 2.2 Informatie over de bedrijfsvoering: 7% 11 2.3 Klacht over deelname, de gang van zaken: 56% 13 2.4 Klacht over kinderen die willen bellen: 3% 17 2.5 Verslaving aan belspelletjes: 8% 18 2.6 Steunbetuiging voor actie: 8% 19 2.7. Is dit een zaak voor de politiek?: 8% 19 2.8 Kenbaar maken van totale afkeer van belspelletjes: 5% 20 3 Wetgeving en Kamervragen 22 3.1 Wetgeving: de Wet op de Kansspelen 22 3.2 De inbelspelletjes op tv: bemoeienis van Kamerleden 24 3.3 Politiek bemoeienis: samenvatting 27 Noten en bronnenverwijzingen 28 Bijlage: Persbericht SP, 23 februari 2001 29 Voorwoord Geachte lezer, Dit onderzoek gaat over de geschiedenis en de consumentenwaar- dering van de TV-inbelspelletjes. ‘Is dit iets voor een politieke partij?’ kan men zich afvragen. Het antwoord is: het zou nee moe- ten zijn, en het had ook nee kunnen zijn. Het is een petite histoire van de laat-maar-lopen mentaliteit die al jaren in de mode is. Dit- maal betreft het een mediaonderwerp. In dit rapport kunt u lezen hoe Kamerleden attentie vroegen voor het onderwerp, hoe de paarse regering gedoogde en hoe omroepen in dit vacuüm vol- ledig hun gang gingen-en gaan. En de reactie van de burger op het verschijnsel ‘inbelspel’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Personal Characteristics and Reference Dependence in Risky Decision-Making for a High-Stakes Game Show
    Name: Robin Rietveldt Student Number: 329975 Date: 27/06/2012 The influence of personal characteristics and reference dependence in risky decision-making for a high-stakes game show By Robin Rietveldt Erasmus University, Erasmus School of Economics _____________________________________________________________________ Abstract This paper takes a look at the decision-making of contestants in the game show “De Postcode Loterij Miljoenenjacht”, the format that is also known as “Deal or No Deal” in countries outside The Netherlands. I have sampled 41 episodes looking for differences in decision-making caused by gender and age. No significant effects were found but this might be related to the fact that the semi final has characteristics of a “selection round”. In addition I looked for signs of reference dependence in the data. The data showed “Winners” and “Losers” were less likely to deal compared to their “Neutral” counterparts. This proves that the course of the game is relevant to what decision a contestant will make at the end of the round. My theory for “Winners” not only includes effects of reference dependence but also the overvaluation of small probabilities. Keywords Decision making under risk; game show; risk preferences; risk aversion; prospect theory; deal or no deal _____________________________________________________________________ Introduction If I look back on the three years of economics education and have to name one core concept of the program that was of most importance it would be decision-making. Whether it was deciding what investment to pursue, what product to buy in the market or how to decide in games according to game theory. But knowing how to optimally decide, or decide rationally, isn’t everything.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Ridge St, North Sydney, NSW 2060 P. +61 2 8458 1300 | E
    6 Ridge St, North Sydney, NSW 2060 p. +61 2 8458 1300 | e. [email protected] rmkcrew.com.au GARY HAMDEN Location Sound Recordist & Boom Operator PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION Australian Film and Television School: Location Sound Recording July 1997, Epping NSW Australian School of Photogenic Arts: 16MM Cam Assistant 1998, St Leonard’s NSW Helicopter Safety and Escape Training: (HUET) - PMAOHS214B valid until 17/3/2013 MAJOR JOBS SUMMARY Documentaries Kolas Secret Society Exposed Mindful Media Sound Recordist 2011- 2012 Aussie Truckers Prospero / CH 7 Sound Recordist 2011 Outback Fight Club Mindful Media Sound Recordist 2010 Rodney’s Robot Revolution Essential Viewing Sound Recordist 2007 - 2008 Once Bitten SBS doco Circe Films Sound Recordist 2008 Mater Hospital Leukemia Raw Cut TV Sound Recordist 2008 Surfing the GAP Glamorous Glue Sound Recordist 2008 Awesome Paw Some Tiger Natural History NZ Sound Recordist 2008 Environmental Documentary Bushfire Heritage Australia Sound Recordist 2007 Going Vertical Big Seas Film Sound Recordist 2007 Reality, Drama & Lifestyle Television Series Recipe to Riches Fremantle Media Sound Recordist 2013 Devils Playground Matchbox Productions Boom Operator 2013 GordyShore Season 6 Lime Pictures Sound Recordist 2013 Australia’s Go Talent Fremantle Media Sound Recordist 2012 & 2011 Ich Bin Ein Star German Granada Productions Sound Recordist 2007 to 2013 Big Brother Global/Endemol southern Audio Director/op 2001 – 2013 Aussie Truckers Prospero / CH 7 Sound Recordist 2011 I’m A Celebrity Get Me Out of Here UK Granada
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009
    Annual Report 2009 Annual Report 2009 This is the printable English version of Oxfam Novib’s online annual report 2009. The online report can be found at www.oxfamnovib.nl/jaarverslag. It is where the reader can search quickly by subject, region, etc. The site also contains videos and many illustrations to accompany the articles, as well as links to further information. The explanation to the Annual Account and the Annual Account itself are included in this PDF document. The reader can also find a separate PDF document of the Annual Account at www.oxfamnovib.nl/jaarverslag. Contents . 1 Report Oxfam Novib’s Board of Directors ........5 4.3 Global Co-operation .......................................... 48 4.3.1 Co-operation with partners ..................................48 2. About us ..............................................................9 4.3.2 International co-operation and lobby....................48 2.1 Our vision ............................................................ 9 2.2 Out method ......................................................... 9 5. Our work in the Netherlands ............................49 2.3 Five basic rights .................................................. 9 5.1 Private donors ................................................... 49 2.4 Vision of the Future ........................................... 10 5.2 Volunteers ......................................................... 53 5.3 Alliances ........................................................... 54 2.5 Our environment ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Miljoenenjacht: Voer Voor Economen Van Den Assem, M.J.; Post, G.T
    VU Research Portal Miljoenenjacht: voer voor economen van den Assem, M.J.; Post, G.T. published in Economisch Statistische Berichten 2005 document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in VU Research Portal citation for published version (APA) van den Assem, M. J., & Post, G. T. (2005). Miljoenenjacht: voer voor economen. Economisch Statistische Berichten, 90(4476), 538-539. http://repub.eur.nl/pub/14122/ General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. E-mail address: [email protected] Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 consumentengedrag Miljoenenjacht: voer voor economen M.J. van den Assem en G.T. Post Onderzoek naar de risicohouding van deelnemers aan Miljoe- Van den Assem en Post zijn respectievelijk als nenjacht laat zien dat ‘pech in het spel’ deelnemers minder universitair docent en hoogleraar werkzaam bij de sectie Finance van de Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen van de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision-Making Under Risk in a Large Payoff Game Show
    TI 2006-009/2 Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper Deal or No Deal? Decision-making under Risk in a Large Payoff Game Show Thierry Post* Guido Baltussen* Martijn Van den Assem Facuulty of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam. * Tinbergen Institute. Tinbergen Institute The Tinbergen Institute is the institute for economic research of the Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Universiteit van Amsterdam, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam Roetersstraat 31 1018 WB Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel.: +31(0)20 551 3500 Fax: +31(0)20 551 3555 Tinbergen Institute Rotterdam Burg. Oudlaan 50 3062 PA Rotterdam The Netherlands Tel.: +31(0)10 408 8900 Fax: +31(0)10 408 9031 Please send questions and/or remarks of non- scientific nature to [email protected]. Most TI discussion papers can be downloaded at http://www.tinbergen.nl. Deal or No Deal? Decision making under risk in a large-payoff game show Thierry Post* Guido Baltussen Martijn Van den Assem Abstract The popular television game show —Deal or No Deal“ offers a unique opportunity for analyzing decision making under risk: it involves very large and wide-ranging stakes, simple stop-go decisions that require minimal skill, knowledge or strategy and near- certainty about the probability distribution. Based on a panel data set of the choices of contestants in all game rounds of 53 episodes from Australia and the Netherlands, we find an average Arrow-Pratt coefficient of relative risk aversion (RRA) between roughly 1 and 2 for initial wealth levels between ⁄0 and ⁄50,000 and assuming full rationality. Risk aversion is lower if we allow for myopic or hyperopic framing.
    [Show full text]
  • Deal Or No Deal? Decision-Making Under Risk in a Large Payoff Game
    TI 2006-009/2 Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper Deal or No Deal? Decision-making under Risk in a Large Payoff Game Show Thierry Post* Guido Baltussen* Martijn Van den Assem Facuulty of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam. * Tinbergen Institute. Tinbergen Institute The Tinbergen Institute is the institute for economic research of the Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Universiteit van Amsterdam, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam Roetersstraat 31 1018 WB Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel.: +31(0)20 551 3500 Fax: +31(0)20 551 3555 Tinbergen Institute Rotterdam Burg. Oudlaan 50 3062 PA Rotterdam The Netherlands Tel.: +31(0)10 408 8900 Fax: +31(0)10 408 9031 Please send questions and/or remarks of non- scientific nature to [email protected]. Most TI discussion papers can be downloaded at http://www.tinbergen.nl. Deal or No Deal? Decision making under risk in a large-payoff game show Thierry Post* Guido Baltussen Martijn Van den Assem Abstract The popular television game show —Deal or No Deal“ offers a unique opportunity for analyzing decision making under risk: it involves very large stakes, simple take-or-leave decisions that require minimal skill or strategy and near-certainty about the probability distribution. Based on a panel data set of the choices of contestants in all game rounds of 53 episodes from Australia and the Netherlands, we find an average Pratt-Arrow relative risk aversion (RRA) between roughly 1 and 2 for initial wealth levels between ⁄0 and ⁄50,000. The RRA differs substantially across the contestants and some even exhibit risk seeking behavior. The cross-sectional differences in RRA can be explained in large part by the previous outcomes experienced by the contestants during the game.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Model for an Audit Certificate
    Banijay Group Year ended December 31, 2020 Statutory auditor’s report on consolidated financial statements ERNST & YOUNG et Autres ERNST & YOUNG et Autres Tél. : +33 (0) 1 46 93 60 00 Tour First www.ey.com/fr TSA 14444 92037 Paris-La Défense cedex Banijay Group Year ended December 31, 2020 Statutory auditor’s report on consolidated financial statements To the President, Opinion In our capacity as statutory auditor of Banijay Group and in accordance with your request in connection with the shareholders’ agreement, we have audited the consolidated financial statements of Banijay Group and its subsidiaries (the Group), which comprise the consolidated statement of financial position and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies. These financial statements were approved by the President, on March 5, 2021, on the basis of the elements available at that date, in the evolving context of the health crisis related to Covid-19. In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the consolidated financial position of the Group as at December 31, 2020, and of its consolidated financial performance and consolidated cash flows for the year then ended, in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the EU. Basis for Opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Group in accordance with the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) (IESBA Code) together with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the consolidated financial statements in France, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the IESBA Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 2/2014 – JLCL
    Volume 29 — Number 2 — 2014 — ISSN 2190-6858 Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics Building and Annotating Corpora of Computer-Mediated Communication: Issues and Challenges at the Interface of Corpus and Computational Linguistics Herausgegeben von/Edited by Michael Beißwenger, Nelleke Oostdijk, Angelika Storrer, Henk van den Heuvel Gesellschaft für Sprachtechnologie & Computerlinguistik Contents Editorial Michael Beißwenger, Nelleke Oostdijk, Angelika Storrer, Henk van den Heuvel ........... iii The CoMeRe corpus for French: structuring and an- notating heterogeneous CMC genres Thierry Chanier, Celine Poudat, Benoit Sagot, Georges Antoniadis, Ciara Wigham, Linda Hriba, Julien Longhi, Djam´eSeddah ...........1 Challenges of building a CMC corpus for analyzing writer's style by age: The DiDi project Aivars Glaznieks, Egon W. Stemle ........ 31 Building Linguistic Corpora from Wikipedia Articles and Discussions Eliza Margaretha, Harald L¨ungen ......... 59 Challenges and experiences in collecting a chat corpus Wilbert Spooren, Tessa van Charldorp ...... 83 Variability in Dutch Tweets. An estimate of the pro- portion of deviant word tokens Hans van Halteren, Nelleke Oostdijk ....... 97 Author Index . 125 Impressum Herausgeber Gesellschaft f¨urSprachtechnologie und Computerlinguistik (GSCL) Aktuelle Ausgabe Band 29 { 2014 { Heft 2 Gastherausgeber Michael Beißwenger, Nelleke Oostdijk, Angelika Storrer, Henk van den Heuvel Anschrift der Redaktion Lothar Lemnitzer Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften J¨agerstr.22/23
    [Show full text]
  • Deal Or No Deal? Decision-Making Under Risk in A
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Erasmus University Digital Repository TI 2006-009/2 Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper Deal or No Deal? Decision-making under Risk in a Large Payoff Game Show Thierry Post* Guido Baltussen* Martijn Van den Assem Facuulty of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam. * Tinbergen Institute. Tinbergen Institute The Tinbergen Institute is the institute for economic research of the Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Universiteit van Amsterdam, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam Roetersstraat 31 1018 WB Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel.: +31(0)20 551 3500 Fax: +31(0)20 551 3555 Tinbergen Institute Rotterdam Burg. Oudlaan 50 3062 PA Rotterdam The Netherlands Tel.: +31(0)10 408 8900 Fax: +31(0)10 408 9031 Please send questions and/or remarks of non- scientific nature to [email protected]. Most TI discussion papers can be downloaded at http://www.tinbergen.nl. Deal or No Deal? Decision making under risk in a large-payoff game show Thierry Post* Guido Baltussen Martijn Van den Assem Abstract The popular television game show —Deal or No Deal“ offers a unique opportunity for analyzing decision making under risk: it involves very large stakes, simple take-or-leave decisions that require minimal skill or strategy and near-certainty about the probability distribution. Based on a panel data set of the choices of contestants in all game rounds of 53 episodes from Australia and the Netherlands, we find an average Pratt-Arrow relative risk aversion (RRA) between roughly 1 and 2 for initial wealth levels between ⁄0 and ⁄50,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Image Transfer Between Brands in the Broadcasting System
    Image transfer between brands in the broadcasting system An explorative research on image transfer and spillover effects between brands in the broadcasting system Student name: Sander Borghouts Student number: 10659099 Supervisor: Roger Pruppers Second corrector: Jorge Labadie Amsterdam Business School, Faculty of Economics and Business University of Amsterdam Master Thesis Date: August 8 2014 1 Table of Contents 1. SO MANY BRANDS, SUCH AN OBTUSE PASTIME ......................................................................................... 4 1.1 BRANDS IN THE BROADCASTING SYSTEM ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.2 BROADCASTING BRANDS IN THE CURRENT EVENTS .......................................................................................................... 5 1.3 PROBLEM DEFINITION ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.4 CONTRIBUTIONS ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.5 GENERAL OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 2. BROADCASTING COMPONENTS AS FULL-FLEDGED CONSUMER BRANDS ....................................... 10 2.1 CLASSIC BRAND DEFINITION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]