Folia Botanica Extremadurensis, 11 (2017)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Fuchsia Boliviana Global Invasive Species
FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Fuchsia boliviana Fuchsia boliviana System: Terrestrial Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Plantae Magnoliophyta Magnoliopsida Myrtales Onagraceae Common name Synonym Fuchsia boliviana , Carri?re var. luxurians Johnst.? Similar species Fuchsia magellanica, Fuchsia x exoniensis Summary Fuchsia boliviana is a small tree that develops rapidly. In tropical regions where it has been introduced (such as La Réunion or Hawaii), this plant tends to dominate native plant species. The dense foliage of large stands of Fuchsia boliviana intercept the light limiting the development of native understory species. view this species on IUCN Red List Principal source: Compiler: Comité français de l'UICN (IUCN French Committee) & IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) Review: Pubblication date: 2008-03-14 ALIEN RANGE [1] REUNION [1] SAINT HELENA BIBLIOGRAPHY 7 references found for Fuchsia boliviana Managment information Varnham, K. 2006. Non-native species in UK Overseas Territories: a review. JNCC Report 372. Peterborough: United Kingdom. Summary: This database compiles information on alien species from British Overseas Territories. Available from: http://www.jncc.gov.uk/page-3660 [Accessed 10 November 2009] General information Baret, S., Rouget, M., Richardson, D. M., Lavergne, C., Egoh, B., Dupont, J., & Strasberg, D. 2006. Current distribution and potential extent of the most invasive alien plant species on La R?union (Indian Ocean, Mascarene islands). Austral Ecology, 31, 747-758. Summary: L objectif de ce papier est d identifier les zones prioritaires en mati?re de gestion des invasions biologiques ? La R?union en mod?lisant la distribution actuelle et potentiellle d une s?lection de plantes parmi les plus envahissantes. -
Vestured Pits in Wood of Onagraceae: Correlations with Ecology, Habit, and Phylogeny1
VESTURED PITS IN WOOD OF Sherwin Carlquist2 and Peter H. Raven3 ONAGRACEAE: CORRELATIONS WITH ECOLOGY, HABIT, AND PHYLOGENY1 ABSTRACT All Onagraceae for which data are available have vestured pits on vessel-to-vessel pit pairs. Vestures may also be present in some species on the vessel side of vessel-to-ray pit pairs. Herbaceous Onagraceae do not have fewer vestures, although woods with lower density (Circaea L. and Oenothera L.) have fewer vestures. Some Onagraceae from drier areas tend to have smaller vessel pits, and on that account may have fewer vestures (Epilobium L. and Megacorax S. Gonz´alez & W. L. Wagner). Pit apertures as seen on the lumen side of vessel walls are elliptical, occasionally oval, throughout the family. Vestures are predominantly attached to pit aperture margins. As seen from the outer surfaces of vessels, vestures may extend across the pit cavities. Vestures are usually absent or smaller on the distal portions of pit borders (except for Ludwigia L., which grows consistently in wet areas). Distinctive vesture patterns were observed in the several species of Lopezia Cav. and in Xylonagra Donn. Sm. & Rose. Vestures spread onto the lumen-facing vessel walls of Ludwigia octovalvis (Jacq.) P. H. Raven. Although the genera are presented here in the sequence of a recent molecular phylogeny of Onagraceae, ecology and growth forms are more important than evolutionary relationships with respect to abundance, degree of grouping, and morphology of vestured pits. Designation of vesture types is not warranted based on the distribution of named types in Onagraceae and descriptive adjectives seem more useful, although more data on vesturing in the family are needed before patterns of diversity and their extent can be fully ascertained. -
PLANT LIST for POLLINATORS Part 1 – a Concise List of Suggested Garden Plants That Are Attractive to Pollinating Insects
THE ACTION PLAN FOR POLLINATORS SUGGESTED PLANT LIST FOR POLLINATORS Part 1 – A concise list of suggested garden plants that are attractive to pollinating insects This is a list of suggested garden plants. We have only selected flowers which are garden- worthy, easily obtainable, well-known, and widely acknowledged as being attractive to pollinating insects. In some case we have given extra comments about garden- worthiness. This is intended as a clear and concise short list to help gardeners; it is not intended to be comprehensive and we have avoided suggesting plants which are difficult to grow or obtain, or whose benefit to pollinators is still a matter for debate. We have omitted several plants that are considered to have invasive potential, and have qualified some others on the list with comments advising readers how to avoid invasive forms. PLANT ANGELICA (Angelica species). Attractive to a range of insects, especially hoverflies and solitary bees. AUBRETIA (Aubrieta deltoides hybrids). An important early nectar for insects coming out of hibernation. BELLFLOWER (Campanula species and cultivars). Forage for bumblebees and some solitary bees. BETONY (Stachys officinalis). Attractive to bumblebees. Butterfly Conversation’s Awarded the Royal Horticultural Top Butterflys Society’s ‘Award of Garden Nectar Plants. Merit’. PLANT BIRD’S FOOT TREFOIL (Lotus corniculatus). Larval food plant for Common Blue, Dingy Skipper and several moths. Also an important pollen source for bumblebees. Can be grown in gravel or planted in a lawn that is mowed with blades set high during the flowering period. BOWLES’ WALLFLOWER (Erysimum Bowles Mauve). Mauve perennial wallflower, long season nectar for butterflies, moths and many bee species. -
TAXON:Fuchsia Magellanica Lam. SCORE:18.0 RATING:High Risk
TAXON: Fuchsia magellanica Lam. SCORE: 18.0 RATING: High Risk Taxon: Fuchsia magellanica Lam. Family: Onagraceae Common Name(s): earring flower Synonym(s): Fuchsia gracilis Lindl. hardy fuchsia Fuchsia macrostemma Ruiz & Pav. kulapepeiao lady's eardrops Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 9 Jul 2021 WRA Score: 18.0 Designation: H(HPWRA) Rating: High Risk Keywords: Smothering Shrub, Environmental Weed, Self-Compatible, Spreads Vegetatively, Bird- Dispersed Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 y Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 y outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 y 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals y=1, n=-1 n 405 Toxic to animals y=1, n=0 n 406 Host for recognized pests and pathogens 407 Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans y=1, n=0 n Creation Date: 9 Jul 2021 (Fuchsia magellanica Lam. -
La Familia Asteraceae En El Parque Nacional Los Mármoles, Hidalgo, México
Acta Botanica Mexicana 106: 97-116 (2014) LA FAMILIA ASTERACEAE EN EL PARQUE NACIONAL LOS MÁRMOLES, HIDALGO, MÉXICO CARLOS ALBERTO GARCÍA-SÁNCHEZ1, ARTURO SÁNCHEZ-GONZÁLEZ1,3 Y JOSÉ LUIS VILLASEÑOR2 1Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, (UAEH), Ciudad Universitaria; Carretera Pachuca-Tulancingo km. 4.5, 42184 Mineral de la Reforma, Hidalgo, México. 2Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Biología, Departamento de Botánica, Apdo. postal 70-233, 04510 México, D.F., México. 3Autor para la correspondencia: [email protected] RESUMEN Se realizó un inventario de las especies de la familia Asteraceae presentes en el Parque Nacional Los Mármoles (PNM), localizado en la porción noroeste del estado de Hidalgo. En el PNM se reconocen seis tipos de vegetación, predominando los bosques de Pinus-Quercus y de Quercus. Se encontraron 101 especies, distribuidas en 13 tribus y 51 géneros; dos de ellas naturalizadas (exóticas). Los miembros más numerosos son de las tribus Eupatorieae (26), Heliantheae (17), Astereae (11) y Coreopsideae (10). Los géneros mejor representados son Ageratina (11), Stevia (11), Pseudognaphalium (6) y Dahlia (5). Las especies endémicas al territorio de la República constituyen el componente más importante (54), siguiendo en relevancia las distribuidas de México a Centroamérica (16); solamente cinco (incluyendo las dos introducidas) también existen en el Viejo Mundo. El uso de estimadores no paramétricos indicó que el grado de completitud del inventario de la flora sinanterológica conocida hasta la fecha para el Parque es de entre 70 y 84%. Palabras clave: área natural protegida, Asteraceae, completitud, Hidalgo, inventario florístico, México. ABSTRACT An inventory of the species of Asteraceae occurring in the Los Mármoles National Park (PNM) was carried out; this park is located in the northwestern part of the state of 97 Acta Botanica Mexicana 106: 97-116 (2014) Hidalgo. -
Gardens and Stewardship
GARDENS AND STEWARDSHIP Thaddeus Zagorski (Bachelor of Theology; Diploma of Education; Certificate 111 in Amenity Horticulture; Graduate Diploma in Environmental Studies with Honours) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy October 2007 School of Geography and Environmental Studies University of Tasmania STATEMENT OF AUTHENTICITY This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for any other degree or graduate diploma by the University of Tasmania or in any other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this thesis contains no copy or paraphrase of material previously published or written by other persons, except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis or in footnotes. Thaddeus Zagorski University of Tasmania Date: This thesis may be made available for loan or limited copying in accordance with the Australian Copyright Act of 1968. Thaddeus Zagorski University of Tasmania Date: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis is not merely the achievement of a personal goal, but a culmination of a journey that started many, many years ago. As culmination it is also an impetus to continue to that journey. In achieving this personal goal many people, supervisors, friends, family and University colleagues have been instrumental in contributing to the final product. The initial motivation and inspiration for me to start this study was given by Professor Jamie Kirkpatrick, Dr. Elaine Stratford, and my friend Alison Howman. For that challenge I thank you. I am deeply indebted to my three supervisors Professor Jamie Kirkpatrick, Dr. Elaine Stratford and Dr. Aidan Davison. Each in their individual, concerted and special way guided me to this omega point. -
Threats to Australia's Grazing Industries by Garden
final report Project Code: NBP.357 Prepared by: Jenny Barker, Rod Randall,Tony Grice Co-operative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management Date published: May 2006 ISBN: 1 74036 781 2 PUBLISHED BY Meat and Livestock Australia Limited Locked Bag 991 NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2059 Weeds of the future? Threats to Australia’s grazing industries by garden plants Meat & Livestock Australia acknowledges the matching funds provided by the Australian Government to support the research and development detailed in this publication. This publication is published by Meat & Livestock Australia Limited ABN 39 081 678 364 (MLA). Care is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication. However MLA cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained in the publication. You should make your own enquiries before making decisions concerning your interests. Reproduction in whole or in part of this publication is prohibited without prior written consent of MLA. Weeds of the future? Threats to Australia’s grazing industries by garden plants Abstract This report identifies 281 introduced garden plants and 800 lower priority species that present a significant risk to Australia’s grazing industries should they naturalise. Of the 281 species: • Nearly all have been recorded overseas as agricultural or environmental weeds (or both); • More than one tenth (11%) have been recorded as noxious weeds overseas; • At least one third (33%) are toxic and may harm or even kill livestock; • Almost all have been commercially available in Australia in the last 20 years; • Over two thirds (70%) were still available from Australian nurseries in 2004; • Over two thirds (72%) are not currently recognised as weeds under either State or Commonwealth legislation. -
In Vitro Clonal Propagation of Fuchsia Magellanica Lam
African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 12(7), pp. 670-678, 13 February, 2013 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB DOI: 10.5897/AJB11.3021 ISSN 1684–5315 ©2013 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper In vitro clonal propagation of Fuchsia magellanica Lam. Anjum Parveen* and Sadia Rasheed Department of Botany, University of Karachi, 75270, Pakistan. Accepted 1 August, 2012 Fuchsia magellanica Lam. is a famous ornamental plant which is rarely found in Pakistan. Its beauty and uniqueness made it an important candidate for tissue culture studies especially for regeneration and multiplication purposes. Here, for the very first time we report a rapid and reliable method for the regeneration of F. magellanica in vitro. Axillary buds explants from one year old F. magellanica plant were cultured on Murashige and Skoog's (MS) (1962) medium without any hormone supplementation. Multiplication was carried out by using 1 and 0.1 mg/lit., 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and α-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA), respectively. For elongation purpose, 0.5 µM gibberellic acid (GA3) was used. 0.1 mg/lit. NAA was used to stimulate extensive root development within one month. After successful regeneration, the plantlets were acclimatized into the soil. This study is undertaken to perform in vitro clonal propagation and acclimatization of F. magellanica in order to get hundreds of F. magellanica plants in the laboratory in comparatively less time. Hence, it would be possible to regenerate F. magellanica plants in the laboratory and after successful acclimatization. Key words: Axillary buds, clonal propagation, Murashige and Skoog, 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), α- naphthalene acetic acid (NAA), gibberellic acid (GA3), acclimatization. -
Evaluación Morfológica Y Genética De La Posible Hibridación Entre Fuchsia Microphylla Y F
UNIVERSIDAD MICHOACANA DE SAN NICOLÁS DE HIDALGO Evaluación morfológica y genética de la posible hibridación entre Fuchsia microphylla y F. thymifolia (Onagraceae) TESIS QUE PRESENTA Biol. Cinthya Indira Cervantes Díaz Para obtener el título de Maestra en ciencias biológicas Área temática ecología y conservación Asesor de tesis Doctor en ciencias Eduardo Cuevas García Coasesor de tesis Doctor en ciencias Mauricio Quesada Avendaño Febrero de 2016, Morelia, Michoacán A mi padre Luis A. Cervantes B. A mi madre María Díaz G. A mis hermanos Jonathan y Miguel A mi novio Jorge A. Ramírez S. A mis familiares y amigos Les dedico todo el esfuerzo invertido, porque siempre han creído en mí y han estado a mi lado, incluso para escucharme hablar y hablar sin comprenderme. ¡GRACIAS! AGRADECIMIENTOS A cada uno de los integrantes de mi comité tutoral durante este proceso: Dr. Mauricio, Dr. Fernando, Dr. Antonio, Dr. Omar y sobre todo a mi asesor el Dr. Eduardo Cuevas quien siempre me ha brindado su confianza y apoyo en todo momento. A Gumersindo Sánchez y Hernán quienes me apoyaron desde el primer día de trabajo en el laboratorio. A los Doctores Lucho y Clement muchas gracias por ayudarme y aclararme tantas dudas aunque fuera de rato en rato. A todos mi compañeros del laboratorio del Dr. Mauricio: Francisco, Martín, Marichuy, Jacob, Estrella y demás compañeros de los cuales se me escapa su nombre por el momento, gracias por siempre estar ahí cuando necesite de su auxilio. De igual manera a cada una de las personas que se tomaron un poco de su tiempo para conocer mí proyecto y hacerme sugerencias y/o comentarios al respecto. -
WLGF Pollinator Planting List
Suggested Plant List for Pollinators, September 2014 This list has been produced by Jan Miller on behalf of the North Wales Wildlife Trust and Marc Carlton on behalf of the Wildlife Gardening Forum, at the request of the Welsh Government’s Pollinator Task Force. The authors recognise that producing planting lists for pollinators is not a straightforward exercise. There are still many areas where further research is required in order to improve our understanding of the needs of pollinating insects and the best planting schemes to cater for them. One of the Wildlife Gardening Forum’s aims is to promote more evidence-based research to increase our knowledge and understanding of this subject. This list is based on the compilers’ personal experience over many years as gardeners and naturalists, and incorporates Jan’s work investigating plants for butterflies on behalf of Butterfly Conservation and uses their data sent in by members over twenty years. The list includes a selection of forage plants useful for adult butterflies, moths, hoverflies, bumblebees and solitary bees, which together make up the vast majority of pollinators in Wales. Plants recommended as larval food plants for butterflies and some moths have also been included. Specialised lists of flowers that are recommended as forage for honeybees have been published for many years within the beekeeping community and so we have not specifically covered honeybees in our list, although many of the flowers on our list will be used by honeybees. The list is in two parts. The first part is a list of suggested garden plants. We have only selected flowers which are garden-worthy, easily obtainable, well-known, and widely acknowledged as being attractive to pollinating insects. -
January 1934
The NATION AL HORTICULTURAL MAGAZINE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY JANUARY, 1934 The American Horticultural Society PRESENT ROLL OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS March 1, 1933 OFFICERS President, Mr. Robert Pyle, West Grove, Penna. First Vice-President, Mr. Knowles A. Ryerson, 1601 Argonne Place, N. W., Washington, D. C. Second Vice-President, Mrs. Fairfax Harrison, Belvoir, Fauquier Co., Va. Secretary, C. C. Thomas, 211 Spruce Street, Takoma Park, D. C. Treasurer, Roy G. Pierce, S04 Aspen Street, N. W ., Washington, D. C. DIRECTORS Terms Expiring in 1934 Mrs. Clement S. Houghton, Chestnut F . J. Crider, Superior, Ariz. Hill, Mass. Mrs. Mortimer Fox, Peekskill, N. Y. Mrs. Horatio Gates Lloyd, Haver~ Mr. F. L. Mulford, Washington, D. C. ford, Pa. Mrs. Silas B. Waters, Cincinnati, O. Mr. D. Victor Lumsden, Washington, Dr. Earl B. White, Kensington, Md. D. C. Terms Expiring in 1935 Mr. J. Marion Shull, Chevy Chase, Mr. Fairman R. Furness, Media, Pa. Md. THE NATIONAL HORTICULTURAL MAGAZINE Pubtished by and for the Society B. Y. MORRISON, Editor CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Mr. Alfred Bates Mrs. J. Norman Henry Dr. Clement G. Bowers Mrs. Francis King Mrs. C. I. DeBevoise Miss Frances Edge McIlvaine Dr. W . C. Deming Mr. Carl Purdy Mr. Sherman R. Duffy Mr. C. A. Reed Mrs. Mortimer J. Fox Mr. J. Marion Shull Mr. Arthur D. Slavin SOCIETIES AFFILIATED WITH THE AMERICAN HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY 1933 Alexandria, Virginia, Garden Club, Bethesda Commutrity Garden Club, Mrs. Francis Carter, President, Mrs. Smith, Episcopal High School, Bethesda, Md. Blackstone Garden ClUJb, Alexandria, Va. Mrs. A. G. Ingham, Pres., Wellsville, Virginia. American Amaryllis Society, California Garden Club Federation, Wyndham Hayward, Secretary, Mrs. -
Achillea Milefolium (Yarrow, Wild )(Local Provenance)
Suggested Plant List for Pollinators, September 2014 This list has been produced by Jan Miller on behalf of the North Wales Wildlife Trust and Marc Carlton on behalf of the Wildlife Gardening Forum, at the request of the Welsh Government’s Pollinator Task Force. The authors recognise that producing planting lists for pollinators is not a straightforward exercise. There are still many areas where further research is required in order to improve our understanding of the needs of pollinating insects and the best planting schemes to cater for them. One of the Wildlife Gardening Forum’s aims is to promote more evidence-based research to increase our knowledge and understanding of this subject. This list is based on the compilers’ personal experience over many years as gardeners and naturalists, and incorporates Jan’s work investigating plants for butterflies on behalf of Butterfly Conservation and uses their data sent in by members over twenty years. The list includes a selection of forage plants useful for adult butterflies, moths, hoverflies, bumblebees and solitary bees, which together make up the vast majority of pollinators in Wales. Plants recommended as larval food plants for butterflies and some moths have also been included. Specialised lists of flowers that are recommended as forage for honeybees have been published for many years within the beekeeping community and so we have not specifically covered honeybees in our list, although many of the flowers on our list will be used by honeybees. The list is in two parts. The first part is a list of suggested garden plants. We have only selected flowers which are garden-worthy, easily obtainable, well-known, and widely acknowledged as being attractive to pollinating insects.