Proceedings-Ecology and Management of Annual Rangelands; 1992 May 18-21; Boise, ID

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proceedings-Ecology and Management of Annual Rangelands; 1992 May 18-21; Boise, ID This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. SEED USE BY DESERT GRANIVORES William S. Longland ABSTRACT and high-elevation deserts, because most bird species are resident only from spring through fall, and they eat in­ Three western Great Basin study areas that have under­ sects during much of this time, while ants are relatively gone extensive disturbance were monitored for species com­ inactive above ground when temperatures are cold. By position ofgranivorous rodents. Disturbed habitats at two contrast, nonhibernating rodent species are active forag­ of these sites (Red Rock and Flanigan) recovered with na­ ers for seeds all year. Furthermore, birds and ants glean tive or introduced perennial plants and were dominated seeds largely from the soil surface; rodents dig for buried by heteromyid rodent species, which are important seed­ seeds as well (Johnson and Jorgensen 1981). Thus, rodents dispersal agents for many desert plants. At one of these are often the main consumers of desert plant seeds. In sites, Indian ricegrass-a native perennial grass-rapidly addition to consuming seeds, though, large numbers of dominated the disturbed area, perhaps because of strong seeds are cached by desert rodent species in three families interactions between this grass and local heteromyid rodents. (Heteromyidae-the kangaroo rats, kangaroo mice, and The third site (Noble), which lacks heteromyids, has become pocket mice; Muridae-the New World mice, voles, and infested with an introduced annual weed (medusahead). The woodrats; and Sciuridae-the ground squirrels and chip­ seed dispersal activities ofheteromyids may be important munks). The heteromyids are a diverse group that is well in obtaining desirable responses to disturbance on desert represented in most desert localities. rangelands. Heteromyids and other arid-land rodents can harvest substantial fractions of a given plant species' seed produc­ INTRODUCTION tion. The degree of granivory probably depends both on seed density and on desirability of particular seed types. Granivorous, or seed-eating, animals are the most abun­ Thus, seeds of some plant species are greatly reduced dant and diverse herbivores in North American deserts. by rodents, while others may be barely touched (table 1). This high abundance and diversity is probably due to the From a plant's perspective, it is what the rodent does with generally greater availability and suitability of seeds as the harvested seed that is important. food compared to other types of plant materials in deserts. After seeds are harvested, rodents may consume them Desert plants produce large seasonal flushes of seeds, or cache them in one of two ways (Price and Jenkins 1986). which remain dormant and retain their nutritional quality "Larderhoarding" -practiced by most desert rodents­ for substantially longer periods than other aboveground refers to placing large caches in a centrally located burrow plant parts (Janzen 1971). Even with the seasonal nature or nest. "Scatterhoarding"-practiced mainly by hetero­ of desert seed production, seeds are available to desert myids and to a lesser degree by sciurids-refers instead granivores in the soil seed pool year-round; this is well to placing numerous smaller caches in shallow depres­ illustrated by occasional spring flushes of annual plants sions on the ground surface and covering them with soil. from seeds lying dormant in the soil over one or more win­ ters. These properties of desert plant seeds (seasonal pro­ duction in massive quantities and nutritional retention over time) also make them an ideal food for storing for fu­ Table 1-Previous studies documenting percentages of plant seed ture use. As a consequence, granivorous diets have been production harvested by rodents adopted by various groups of desert animals, and desert plants, having coevolved with these granivores, often ex­ Plant type Seeds hibit adaptations that either reduce levels of seed preda­ (site) harvested Source tion or allow them to capitalize on granivore activities for Percent dispersing their seeds. Here, I concentrate on the latter Annual grasses 93 Pearson 1964 coevolutionary relationship-seed dispersal. (California Central Valley) Various groups of rodents, birds, and seed-harvester Annual grasses 30-65 Borchert and Jain 1978 ants comprise the granivore guild in North American (Southern California) deserts (Brown and others 1979). Birds and ants are to Erodium cicutarium 95 Soholt 1973 a large extent seasonal granivores, especially in northern (Mojave Desert) Larrea tridentata 87 Chew and Chew 1970 (Chihuahuan Desert) Oryzopsis hymenoides 46 McAdoo and others 1983 (Great Basin Desert) Desert plants 30-80 Nelson and Chew 19n Paper presented at the Symposium on Ecology, Management, and Res­ toration of Intermountain Annual Rangelands, Boise, ID, May 18-22, 1992. (Mojave Desert, NV) William S. Longland is Research Ecologist, U.S. Department of Agricul­ Forbs <1 Pulliam and Brand 1975 ture, Agricultural Research Service, Conservation Biology of Rangelands, (Arizona grassland) Reno, NV 89512. 233 It is through scatterhoarding activities that desert rodents heteromyid species, while at the third site, which is domi­ are most likely to have a positive effect on seedling recruit­ nated by an introduced annual weed species, heteromyids ment; larderhoards are generally placed too deep under­ and other scatterhoarders are rare. I also discuss data ground for seedlings to successfully emerge if they germi­ from two experiments: (1) a field study illustrating strong nate. Thus, the net effect of rodents on seedling recruitment interactions between heteromyids and a native animal­ of a particular plant species is largely determined by num­ dispersed grass species, and (2) laboratory seed preference bers of seeds that are removed from the germinable seed tests with captive heteromyids showing that these rodents pool by consumption and larderhoarding versus numbers prefer seeds of this native grass to those of two introduced that persist in scatterhoards for later germination (Price annual grasses. My aim is to illustrate the potential im­ and Jenkins 1986). Scatterhoards that are not recovered portance of scatterhoarding granivores for desert range­ for future consumption may benefit seeds in three different lands by showing examples of desirable successional re­ ways: (1) buried seeds may have a higher probability of sponses to disturbance where these animals are common germination and establishment than unburied seeds and undesirable responses where they are lacking. Cer­ (Vander Wall1990), (2) buried seeds are not vulnerable to tainly, numerous ecological and historical factors combine consumption by nonscatterhoarding granivores (birds and to determine such responses, but plant/animal interactions ants) that harvest seeds only from the soil surface (Price involving native granivores are one such factor that has and JenkinS 1986), and (3) seeds of certain desert plant spe­ received little attention. cies may have enhanced germinability when they have been handled by scatterhoarding rodents (La Tourette and others METHODS 1971; McAdoo and others 1983; Reynolds and Glendening 1949). In this regard, heteromyid rodents, being very com­ Field studies were conducted at two northwestern mon and avid scatterhoarders in North American deserts, Nevada sites (Red Rock, Washoe Co., Reno NW Quad.: are very important components of arid rangeland commu­ T21N.R18E.S14; and Flanigan, Washoe Co., Flanigan nities. Although heteromyids have been known to have Quad. T27N.R18E.S2) and a northeastern California site important effects on range vegetation for some time (for (Noble, Lassen Co., Shaffer Mtn. Quad. T30N.R15E.S27). example, Reynolds 1950), results oflong-term experiments The Red Rock and Flanigan sites were burned in 1985 in the Chihuahuan Desert have recently highlighted the and 1988, respectively, while the Noble site was disturbed ecological significance of these "keystone" granivores; ro­ by extensive grazing of sheep over several decades preced­ dent exclusion experiments have shown that heteromyids ing this study. Prefire vegetation at Red Rock consisted of directly affect the species composition and physiognomy big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata), Mormon tea (Ephe­ of the local plant community (Brown and Heske 1990). dra viridis ), desert peach (Prunus andersonii), and various Table 2 lists a sample of plant species that have been herbaceous species seeded after a previous fire, especially found germinating from rodent scatterhoards; this list in­ crested wheatgrass (Agropyron desertorum), which domi­ cludes grasses, shrubs, and trees and both native and intro­ nates the postfire vegetation. Prefire vegetation at Flanigan duced species. The native species listed appear to be depen­ consisted largely of big sagebrush, scattered shrubs of other dent on harvesting by animals for dispersal since their seeds native species, and infrequent bunches of Indian ricegrass lack external appendages that could facilitate dispersal by (Oryzopsis hymenoides); Indian ricegrass dominates the other means (for example, wind or adhesion to fur), while postfire community at Flanigan. The Noble site was domi­ the introduced species (cheatgrass) has such appendages nated by low sagebrush <Artemisia arbuscula) before dis­ to facilitate dispersal. This is to be expected, since native turbance and remains so in adjacent undisturbed areas; plant species
Recommended publications
  • Genetic Analysis of Native and Introduced Populations of Taeniatherum Caput-Medusae (Poaceae): Implications for Biological Control
    Genetic analysis of native and introduced populations of Taeniatherum caput-medusae (Poaceae): implications for biological control S.J. Novak1,2 and R. Sforza3 Summary Genetic analysis of both native and introduced populations of invasive species can be used to exam­ ine population origins and spread. Accurate delineation of an invasive species’ source populations can contribute to the search for specific and effective biological control agents. Medusahead, Tae- niatherum caput-medusae (L.) Nevski, a primarily self-pollinating Eurasian annual grass that was introduced in the western USA in the late 1800s, is now widely distributed in California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah and Washington. The goal of our current research is to assess introduction dynamics and range expansion of this grass in the western USA, and to identify source populations in the native range to facilitate the search for potential biocontrol agents. Across introduced populations, nine multilocus genotypes were detected, and we suggest a minimum of seven separate introduction events of T. caput-medusae in the western USA. Although range expansion appears to have occurred primarily on a local level, several introduced populations appear to be composed of admixtures of introduced genotypes. None of the native populations analysed to date possess the exact multilocus genotypes detected in introduced populations. We have recently begun screening Eurasian popula­ tions using intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) genetic markers to determine whether this polymerase chain reaction–based technique can provide a higher degree of resolution for the identification of source populations. Keywords: invasive grass, multilocus genotypes, multiple introductions. Introduction (Novak and Mack, 2001, 2005; Lavergne and Molof­ sky, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Grazing Potential and Management: Knapweeds Are Generally Unpalatable to Livestock, Especially When Mature. Nutritive Value of R
    Grazing potential and management: Knapweeds are generally unpalatable to livestock, especially when mature. Nutritive value of rosette and bud stages is high (protein levels similar to alfalfa). Methods of grazing of knapweeds and starthistle without damaging associated more desirable forage species have not been developed except in isolated cases. Knapweeds are aggressive invaders and quickly dominate disturbed areas in rangeland or pasture. Management that maintains the vigor of perennial vegetation can slow, but not prevent, the invasion of knapweeds. Poisonous or mechanical injury properties: The spines of yellow starthistle may cause mechanical injury to livestock. Yellow starthistle and Russian knapweed cause "chewing disease" (nigropallidal encephalomalacia) in horses. Rehabilitation potential: The best strategies for knapweeds combine prevention, containment and controL Herbicides can be used effectively to prevent spread, eliminate new infestations, and as part of rehabilitation programs for more productive land. The knapweeds, except Russian, are easily killed with herbicides, but produce large numbers of seeds and will reoccupy the site unless desired competitive vegetation is established. In northeastern Washington, pastures were rehabilitated by selective herbicide followed by nitrogen fertilizer to revitalize the remnant perennial grasses. Biological control insects include 3 gall-forming flies (Urophora spp.), a seed-feeding fly (Chaetorellia), 3 seed-feeding weevils (Bangasternus, Larinus and Eustenopus), a root-feeding beetle (Sphenoptera), a seed-feeding moth (Metzneria), and a root-feeding moth (Agapeta). The goal is to establish enough host-specific insects to overgraze the weed and limit its competitiveness. For further information, refer to Knapweeds of Washington (EB1393), Meadow Knapweed (EB1524) and the Pacific Northwest Weed Control Handbook.
    [Show full text]
  • Taeniatherum Caput-Medusae (L.) Nevski (= Elymus Caput-Medusae L
    A WEED REPORT from the book Weed Control in Natural Areas in the Western United States This WEED REPORT does not constitute a formal recommendation. When using herbicides always read the label, and when in doubt consult your farm advisor or county agent. This WEED REPORT is an excerpt from the book Weed Control in Natural Areas in the Western United States and is available wholesale through the UC Weed Research & Information Center (wric.ucdavis.edu) or retail through the Western Society of Weed Science (wsweedscience.org) or the California Invasive Species Council (cal-ipc.org). Taeniatherum caput-medusae (L.) Nevski (= Elymus caput-medusae L. [Jepson Manual 2012]) Medusahead Family: Poaceae Range: Arizona, California, Idaho, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington; a few locations in the northeastern states. Habitat: Disturbed sites, grassland, rangeland, openings in chaparral, oak woodlands, and rarely in agronomic fields. Generally in areas that receive at least 9 inches of rain per year, so not common in the low desert. Grows best on clay soils or where deep soil moisture is available late in the growing season. Origin: Native to the Mediterranean region. Impact: Dense stands displace desirable vegetation and reduce livestock and wildlife carrying capacity. Unpalatable to livestock except during the early growth stages. The stiff awns and hard florets can injure eyes, nostrils, and mouths of grazing animals. Birds and rodents usually avoid feeding on the seeds. Senesced plants form a dense layer of thatch that takes a couple of years to decompose. The thatch layer changes the temperature and moisture dynamics of the soil, reduces seed germination of other species, and creates fuel for wildfires.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals of the California Desert
    MAMMALS OF THE CALIFORNIA DESERT William F. Laudenslayer, Jr. Karen Boyer Buckingham Theodore A. Rado INTRODUCTION I ,+! The desert lands of southern California (Figure 1) support a rich variety of wildlife, of which mammals comprise an important element. Of the 19 living orders of mammals known in the world i- *- loday, nine are represented in the California desert15. Ninety-seven mammal species are known to t ':i he in this area. The southwestern United States has a larger number of mammal subspecies than my other continental area of comparable size (Hall 1981). This high degree of subspeciation, which f I;, ; leads to the development of new species, seems to be due to the great variation in topography, , , elevation, temperature, soils, and isolation caused by natural barriers. The order Rodentia may be k., 2:' , considered the most successful of the mammalian taxa in the desert; it is represented by 48 species Lc - occupying a wide variety of habitats. Bats comprise the second largest contingent of species. Of the 97 mammal species, 48 are found throughout the desert; the remaining 49 occur peripherally, with many restricted to the bordering mountain ranges or the Colorado River Valley. Four of the 97 I ?$ are non-native, having been introduced into the California desert. These are the Virginia opossum, ' >% Rocky Mountain mule deer, horse, and burro. Table 1 lists the desert mammals and their range 1 ;>?-axurrence as well as their current status of endangerment as determined by the U.S. fish and $' Wildlife Service (USWS 1989, 1990) and the California Department of Fish and Game (Calif.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroleum Coke and Plants: Impact on Growth and Physiology
    Petroleum coke and plants: Impact on growth and physiology By: Colin Keiji Nakata A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of; MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Botany University of Manitoba Winnipeg, MB., Canada March 14th,2007 Copyright A 2007 by Colin Keiji Nakata THE TJNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STT]DIES ****:* COPYRIGHT PERMISSION Petroleum coke and Plants: Impact on growth and PhYsiolog¡r BY Colin Keiji Nakata A Thesis/Practicum submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirement of the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Colin Keiji Nakata @2007 permission has been granted to the Library of the University of Manitoba to lend or sell copies of this thesigpracticum,io the National Library of Canada to microfîlm this thesis and to lend or sell copies of túe film, aná to University Microfilms rnc. to publish an abstract of this thesis/practicum. This reproduction or copy of this thesis has been made available by authority of the copyright owner solóty for the purpose of private study and research, and may only be reproduced and copied owner. as permitied by copyright laws or with express written authorization from the copyright l1 Ansrnacr: Greenhouse studies were conducted to determine the effects of coke, a by-product of the oil sand industry, on the emergence, growth and physiology of Triticum aestivum, Deschampsia caespitosa, Calamagr-ostis canadensis, Agropyron trachycaulum, Oryzopsis hymenoides, Fragaria virginiana and Cornus set"icea. Accumulation of potentially toxic elements in plant tissues was also determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1 CREATING A WILDLIFE FRIENDLY YARD ......................................................................2 With Plant Variety Comes Wildlife Diversity...............................................................2 Existing Yards....................................................................................................2 Native Plants ......................................................................................................3 Why Choose Organic Fertilizers?......................................................................3 Butterfly Gardens...............................................................................................3 Fall Flower Garden Maintenance.......................................................................3 Water Availability..............................................................................................4 Bird Feeders...................................................................................................................4 Provide Grit to Assist with Digestion ................................................................5 Unwelcome Visitors at Your Feeders? ..............................................................5 Attracting Hummingbirds ..................................................................................5 Cleaning Bird Feeders........................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Taeniatherum Caput-Medusae) Using Timely Sheep Grazing
    Invasive Plant Science and Management 2008 1:241–247 Research Control of Medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae) Using Timely Sheep Grazing Joseph M. DiTomaso, Guy B. Kyser, Melvin R. George, Morgan P. Doran, and Emilio A. Laca* Medusahead is among the most invasive grasses in the western United States. Selective control of this noxious winter annual grass is difficult in California grasslands, as many other desirable annual grasses and both native and nonnative broadleaf forbs are also important components of the rangeland system. Intensive grazing management using sheep is one control option. This study was designed to determine the optimal timing for sheep grazing on heavily infested medusahead sites, and to evaluate the changes in species composition with different grazing regimes. Midspring (April/May) grazing reduced medusahead cover by 86 to 100% relative to ungrazed plots, regardless of whether it was used in combination with early spring or fall grazing. Early spring (March) or fall (October to November) grazing, alone or in combination, was ineffective for control of medusahead. In addition, midspring grazing increased forb cover, native forb species richness, and overall plant diversity. At the midspring grazing timing, medusahead was in the ‘‘boot’’ stage, just prior to exposure of the inflorescences. The success of this timely grazing system required high animal densities for short periods. Although this approach may be effective in some areas, the timing window is fairly narrow and the animal stocking rates are high. Thus, sheep grazing is unlikely to be a practical solution for management of large medusahead infestations. Nomenclature: Medusahead, Taeniatherum caput-medusae (L.) Nevski ELYCA.
    [Show full text]
  • Linking Physiological Traits and Species Abundance to Invasion Resistance
    Linking physiological traits and species abundance to invasion resistance Jeremy James Framework • Plant community composition influences ecosystem properties • Much emphasis on effects of functional group diversity on ecosystem properties • Invasive plant management can be improved by managing plant communities based on functional traits as opposed to functional groups Outline • An example of how functional traits influence ecosystem properties (N capture and invasion) – Traits related to N capture – Trait effects on ecosystems are moderated by species abundance • What traits might be important to consider when revegetating areas prone to weed invasion? – At the seedling stage traits affecting initial growth rate important • Conclusions and future directions Functional group diversity, nitrogen capture and invasion resistance Study site Group Code Common Name Scientific Name Annual BRTE cheatgrass Bromus tectorum L. Annual TACA medusahead Taeniatherum caput-medusae (L.) Nevski Bunchgrass PSSP bluebunch wheatgrass Pseudoroegneria spicata (Pursh) A. Löve Bunchgrass ELEL bottlebrush squirreltail Elymus elymoides (Raf.) Swezey Bunchgrass POSE Sandberg’s bluegrass Poa secunda J. Presl Forb LOTR nineleaf biscuitroot Lomatium triternatum (Pursh) Coult. & Rose Forb CRIN grey hawksbeard Crepis intermedia Gray Experimental design • 15N was injected into soils around 7 study species • Injections were made: – 3 times during the growing season (April, May June) – At 2 soil depth (2-7 cm, 17-22 cm) + - – Using 2 forms of N (NH4 , NO3 ) • Removal plots
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Foundation Bunchgrass Species Abundances: Model-Assisted Decision-Making in Protected-Area Sagebrush Steppe 1, 2 3 3 4 THOMAS J
    #825 Predicting foundation bunchgrass species abundances: model-assisted decision-making in protected-area sagebrush steppe 1, 2 3 3 4 THOMAS J. RODHOUSE, KATHRYN M. IRVINE, ROGER L. SHELEY, BRENDA S. SMITH, SHIRLEY HOH, 5 5 DANIEL M. ESPOSITO, AND RICARDO MATA-GONZALEZ 1Upper Columbia Basin Network, National Park Service, 63095 Deschutes Market Road, Bend, Oregon 97701 USA 2Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, United States Geological Survey, 2327 University Way, Suite 2, Bozeman, Montana 59715 USA 3Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 67826-A, Highway 205, Burns, Oregon 97720 USA 4John Day Fossil Beds National Monument, National Park Service, 32651 Highway 19, Kimberly, Oregon 97848 USA 5Department of Animal and Rangeland Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 USA Citation: Rodhouse, T. J., K. M. Irvine, R. L. Sheley, B. S. Smith, S. Hoh, D. M. Esposito, and R. Mata-Gonzalez. 2014. Predicting foundation bunchgrass species abundances: model-assisted decision-making in protected-area sagebrush steppe. Ecosphere 5(9):108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00169.1 Abstract. Foundation species are structurally dominant members of ecological communities that can stabilize ecological processes and influence resilience to disturbance and resistance to invasion. Being common, they are often overlooked for conservation but are increasingly threatened from land use change, biological invasions, and over-exploitation. The pattern of foundation species abundances over space and time may be used to guide decision-making, particularly in protected areas for which they are iconic. We used ordinal logistic regression to identify the important environmental influences on the abundance patterns of bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), Thurber’s needlegrass (Achnatherum thurber- ianum), and Sandberg bluegrass (Poa secunda) in protected-area sagebrush steppe.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Temporal Continuity of Kangaroo Rat Populations Shown by Sequencing Mitochondrial DNA from Museum Specimens
    Spatial and Temporal Continuity of Kangaroo Rat Populations Shown by Sequencing Mitochondrial DNA from Museum Specimens W. Kelley Thomas, Svante Paabo, Francis X. Villablanca, and Allan C. Wilson Surnmary. The advent ofdirect sequencing via the region - tRNA genes - Population dynamics ­ POlymerase chain reaction (PCR) has opened up the Population tree- Molecular trees Possibility of molecular studies on museum speci­ ~~ns. Here we analyze genetic variation in popu­ attons over time by applying PCR to DNA extract­ Introduction ed from museum specimens sampled from iPulations of one species over the last 78 years. Over the past 10 years, mitochondrial DNA ncluded in this study were 43 museum specimens (mtDNA) has been a productive source of infor­ o_fthe Panamint kangaroo rat Dipodomys panamin­ mation about genetic variation at and below the lLnu.s from localities representing each ofthree geo­ species level (for reviews, see Wilson et al. 1985; graphically distinct subspecies. These specimens Hamson 1988). However, because these studies have :were originally collected and prepared as dried skins been restricted to the analysis of present-day pop­ 10 19 11 , 1917, or 1937. For each specimen, a 225­ ulations, they represent a static view ofthe historic bp segment of the mitochondrial genome was se­ processes that shape the genetic variation detected quenced. These mitochondrial DNA sequences were in contemporary populations. Due to recent tech­ compared to those of 63 specimens collected at the nical advances brought about by the polymerase same localities in 1988. The three subspecies were chain reaction (PCR) (Kocher et al. 1989; Paabo et n~a rl y completely distinct.
    [Show full text]
  • Medusahead (Taeniatherum Caput-Medusae) Plant Guide
    Plant Guide Well-established medusahead communities have low plant species diversity and have low value for wildlife MEDUSAHEAD habitat (Miller et al. 1999). Rabbits will graze medusahead (Sharp et al. 1957). Bodurtha et al. (1989) Taeniatherum caput-medusae reported that mule deer will frequent medusahead mixed (L.) Nevski communities but they will not eat medusahead. Savage et Plant symbol = TACA8 al. (1969) reported that chucker partridge consumed medusahead seeds in a controlled feeding study but further reported that the birds lost weight. Contributed By: USDA, NRCS, Washington & Idaho Plant Materials Program Status Consult the PLANTS Web site and your State Department of Natural Resources for this plant’s current status (e.g., threatened or endangered species, state noxious status, and wetland indicator values). Weediness Medusahead originates from Eurasia and was first reported in North America in the 1880s (Furbush 1953). By 2003, it occupied approximately 2.3 million acres in 17 western states (Rice, 2005). Pellant and Hall (1994) suggest that 76 million acres of public land is susceptible to invasion by winter annuals including cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum ) and medusahead. Medusahead’s success is largely a result of it being native Caution: This plant is highly invasive. to a Eurasian region with similar temperature-moisture patterns as found in the Intermountain West and inland Alternate Names valleys of California. Summers are warm and dry; fall, Medusahead wildrye, medusahead rye, rough winter, and spring seasons are cool to cold and moist. medusahead. Diverse native plant communities inhibit colonization of Uses weedy species because these communities more fully Erosion Control: Medusahead is a winter annual grass exploit soil and moisture resources.
    [Show full text]
  • INDIAN RICEGRASS Erosion Control/Reclamation: One of Indian Ricegrass' Greatest Values Is for Stabilizing Sites Susceptible to Achnatherum Hymenoides Wind Erosion
    Plant Guide INDIAN RICEGRASS Erosion control/reclamation: One of Indian ricegrass' greatest values is for stabilizing sites susceptible to Achnatherum hymenoides wind erosion. It is well adapted to stabilization of (Roemer & J.A. Schultes) disturbed sandy soils in mixes with other species. It is naturally an early invader onto disturbed sandy Barkworth sites (after and in concert with needle and thread Plant Symbol = ACHY grass). It is also one of the first to establish on cut and fill slopes. It does not compete well with Contributed By: USDA NRCS Idaho State Office aggressive introduced grasses during the establishment period, but is very compatible with slower developing natives, such as Snake River wheatgrass (Elymus wawawaiensis), bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata), thickspike wheatgrass (Elymus lanceolata ssp. lanceolata), streambank wheatgrass (Elymus lanceolata ssp. psammophila), western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii), and needlegrass species (Stipa spp. and Ptilagrostis spp.). Drought tolerance combined with fibrous root system and fair to good seedling vigor, make Indian ricegrass desirable for reclamation in areas receiving 8 to 14 inches annual precipitation. Wildlife: Forage value is mentioned in the grazing/rangeland/hayland section above. Due to the abundance of plump, nutritious seed produced by Indian ricegrass, it is considered an excellent food source for birds, such as morning doves, pheasants, and songbirds. Rodents collect the seed for winter food supplies. It is considered good cover habitat for small
    [Show full text]