Jesus, the Destruction of Jerusalem, and the Coming of the Son of Man in Luke 21:5-38 Robert H

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jesus, the Destruction of Jerusalem, and the Coming of the Son of Man in Luke 21:5-38 Robert H Jesus, the Destruction of Jerusalem, and the Coming of the Son of Man in Luke 21:5-38 Robert H. Stein n Luke 21:5-38 we encounter Jesus’ third and Jesus boldly warned of God’s forthcoming destruc- Ilargest pronouncement in this Gospel concern- tion of Israel’s glorious temple. ing the destruction of the Jewish temple and the city of Jerusalem. The two earlier pronouncements LUKE 21:5-7: THE INTRODUCtiON in 13:34-35 and 19:41-44 are much shorter and AND KEY TO UNDERSTANDING less detailed. Along with the parallel accounts in LUKE 21:5-38 Matthew 23:37-39, 24:1-44, and Mark 13:1-37, we The discourse opens with an anonymous find numerous other examples of Jesus’ foretelling “some” commenting to Jesus over the beauty and the destruction of Jerusalem in magnificence of the temple. In Mark 13:1 the Robert H. Stein is Senior Professor Mark 14:58; 15:29; John 2:19-20; “some” is referred to as “one of the disciples” and of New Testament Interpretation at The Acts 6:14. In addition we find an in Matthew 24:1 as “his disciples.” Luke may have Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. acted out parable of this in Jesus’ used “some” to direct Jesus’ reply to his gentile Dr. Stein earned the Ph.D. from cleansing of the temple (Mark audience and Theophilus (Luke 1:3; Acts 1:1). Princeton Theological Seminary, and 11:12-25), and there are sugges- The beautiful stones and the “offerings” are specifi- also taught at Bethel College and Bethel tions of this in the parable of the cally mentioned. The beauty and size of the temple Theological Seminary from 1969-1997. pounds (19:11-27) and parable made it the equal, if not the superior, of many of He is a renowned scholar and has of the vineyard (Mark 12:1-11/ written numerous books, articles, and the famous “seven wonders of the world.” The reviews, including Studying the Synoptic Luke 20:19-18). Consequently, temple built by Zerubbabel and Haggai around Gospels: Origin and Interpretation Jesus’ prophetic proclamation of 515 B.C., after Israel’s return from exile in Baby- (Baker, 2001), Jesus the Messiah: A the temple’s destruction is one lon, underwent a massive rebuilding program Survey of the Life of Christ (InterVarsity, of the most certain aspects of his involving the entire temple mount, as well as the 1996), and Luke in the New American teaching and was a major cause of temple, by Herod the Great. Begun in 20 B.C. (cf. Commentary series (B&H, 1992). his death. Like the OT prophets John 2:20), it continued unabated until A.D. 63. 18 SBJT 16.3 (2012): 18-27. Josephus describes its beauty in his Wars (5.5.1-6 Jesus (5:35), the destruction of Jerusalem (23:29; §§184-227) and Antiquities 15.11.1-7§§380-425. cf. 19:43), or the coming of the Son of Man (17:22). He mentions one of the stones in the foundation Here it refers to a future event—the destruction as being sixty-seven by seven by nine feet and of the temple and Jerusalem. These two events that the stones of the temple were thirty-seven are not identical but are intimately associated by twelve by eighteen feet in size!1 The offerings together. In Jeremiah 7:13-20; Lamentations 2:7- would have included such things as the golden and 9; and Micah 3:12 they are tied together. Further- bronze doors, golden grape clusters, tapestries, etc. more, since the temple lay within the walled city of Although the temple, itself, was not the largest of Jerusalem, there was no way to destroy the temple its day, the entire temple complex measuring about without destroying the city. The fierce defense by 1.5 million square feet was.2 the Jewish people of their temple and city would Jesus’ prophecy of the temple’s coming destruc- assure that the future destruction would involve tion, and by implication the city of Jerusalem as both. The reference to there not being left “one well, must have been surprising (and sacrilegious) stone upon another that will not be thrown down” to many. The huge size of the stones involved (21:6) is hyperbolic in nature, since only exagger- in the temple complex and the massive walls of ated language can do justice to the horrific nature the city gave a sense of security. Jerusalem was a of the events of A.D. 70.3 mighty fortress. The steep Kidron Valley to the The key verse for understanding our passage east and the Hinnom Valley to the south and west involves the two questions addressed to Jesus in made only the northern side of the city vulner- 21:7: “Teacher, when will these things be, and able to attack, and the mighty towers located in the what will be the sign when these things are about walls made an attack extremely difficult. Added to take place?” The whole understanding of Luke to this was the false sense that God would not let 21:5-38 ultimately depends on the interpretation his holy place be destroyed by the pagan Romans. of these two questions. Several issues come into Of course, this is exactly what God permitted the play here. One involves the relationship of these pagan Babylonians to do in 587 B.C.! Jesus was questions with the statement of Jesus concerning not awed by the “stones and offerings” of the tem- the destruction of the temple in 21:6. It is impor- ple. He saw beneath the surface and realized that tant to note that the two questions seek clarifi- underneath the cosmetic beauty of the temple lay cation of Jesus’ statement in the previous verse. all kinds of uncleanness (Matt 23:27-28). The pre- The two questions about “these things” concern vious account of the widow’s mites (21:1-4) reveals Jesus’ statement about the destruction of “these that Jesus judged the inner, spiritual reality of an things,” i.e., the destruction of the temple in 21:6. act, not its external appearance. Thus the widow’s Another issue involves whether the two questions two copper coins were a greater gift than the large concern two different events or two aspects of the gifts given by others. We find a similar situation in same event. The fact that both questions involve the life of Paul when he saw the beauty of the Athe- “these things” (tauta) reveals that the issue being nian acropolis and the magnificence of the Parthe- dealt with concerns the destruction of the temple non. Instead of delighting in their architectural referred to by Jesus in the previous verse. The two glory, he was appalled at the idolatry (Acts 17:16, questions are essentially a form of synonymous 23) and ignorance (17:23, 29-31) they represented. parallelism in which two aspects of the temple’s Jesus responds, “The days will come” (21:6). destruction are referred to. One involves the time This is not a technical term for the coming of (“when”[pote]) of the destruction, and the other the Son of Man and the end of the world, but to involves the appearance of a sign (to sēmeion) indi- a future time. This time can refer to the arrest of cating that the destruction was imminent, but 19 that there was still time for escape (21:20-21). In 21:8-19 is directed to the two questions asked in the parallel account in Mark 13:4 the two ques- the previous verse. Thus, unless indicated other- tions read, “Tell us, when will these things (tauta) wise, the following warnings and statement con- be, and what will be the sign (to sēmeion) when cern the coming destruction of the temple that all these things (tauta … panta) are about to be Jesus has foretold in 21:6. Jesus warns that mes- accomplished.” Although some scholars argue that sianic pretenders would come claiming to be “he,” in Mark these are two different questions (one i.e., the Messiah. They would not be claiming to be dealing with the destruction of the temple and the Jesus of Nazareth, but rather claiming to be who other with the coming of the Son of Man), they Jesus of Nazareth is—the Christ or Messiah (cf. are best understood as an example of synonymous 1:32-33; 2:11, 25-32; 9:18-20; 22:67-71; 23:2, 35, parallelism dealing with two different aspects of 39; 24:26, 46). Along with messianic pretenders the destruction of the temple.4 This is clearly how claiming that “The time is at hand!” there would Luke interprets the two questions for he uses the occur various rumors of wars and insurrections. exact same referent, “these things” (tauta), in both They should not be led astray by this, however, questions! The two questions in 21:7 are the key into thinking that the destruction of Jerusalem to interpreting what follows because they indicate was immediately at hand, for “it will not be at that what follows in 21:8-23 concerns the destruc- once” (21:9). 6 In addition, wars between nations tion of Jerusalem and its temple.5 and kingdoms along with natural disasters such The request for a sign is not viewed negatively as earthquakes, famines, plagues, and even cos- by Jesus, for there is no rebuke addressed to the mic signs will occur. These are not, however, signs questioners.
Recommended publications
  • The Naked Runaway and the Enrobed Reporter of Mark 14 and 16: What Is the Author Doing with What He Is Saying?
    JETS 54.3 (September 2011) 527–45 THE NAKED RUNAWAY AND THE ENROBED REPORTER OF MARK 14 AND 16: WHAT IS THE AUTHOR DOING WITH WHAT HE IS SAYING? !"#!$!% &'#'()**!* There is no question that Mark 14:51–52 is a major crux of Mark’s Gos- pel—the account of a “young man” +eeing naked from the scene as Jesus was arrested. 1 These verses are “a total enigma,” concluded Morna Hooker. A “bizarre episode,” said Eugene Boring. Francis Moloney called it a “strange passage.” “Confusing” and “unclear,” labeled Robert Stein. “[M]akes no sense as an actual incident,” claimed Robin Scroggs and Kent Gro,. “Whimsical,” declared John Knox. 2 This degree of interpretive chaos has resulted in an inordinate amount of speculation, inversely proportional to the evangelist’s reticence, as many a scholar and preacher has exercised upon this crux his or her own expository creativity. The reason for these hermeneutical acrobat- ics is obvious: if 14:51–52 is erased from the account—which apparently is what Matthew and Luke did in their respective Gospels (Matt 26:56–57; Luke 22:54)—what is left actually makes for a seamless reading of a coherent story. 3 But, as far as scholarship can tell us, those two verses remain in the canonical version and -nal form of the Gospel of Mark; and so, preachers have to make some sense of this perplexing text situated in this locus in Mark’s passion. Hence, the proliferation of explanations, particularly dealing with the identity of the “young man” (νεανίσκος) in 14:51–52, who “appears out of nowhere at the wrong place in the story, at the wrong place in the text, like a clown at a funeral, this τις [a certain] young man, this unnamed literary follower following the departure of all followers.” 4 Howard Jackson concludes that, “freed of the shackles of narrative coherence and contextual integrity, many * Abraham Kuruvilla is associate professor of pastoral ministries at Dallas Theological Seminary, 3909 Swiss Ave., Dallas, TX 75204.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans 7 and Sanctification by Andy Woods
    Romans 7 and Sanctification by Andy Woods Introduction This article will argue that one’s understanding of practical sanctification is profoundly impacted by how one views the “I” in Romans 7:7-25. Specifically, the article will argue that the “I” in Romans 7 is Paul, and in verses 14-25 Paul is reflecting upon his post conversion experience. In addition, the article will maintain that a post conversion view of Romans 7:14-25 leads to a dual nature view of the believer. This view teaches that although the believer has a new nature that he received at conversion, his Adamic nature still exists within him and continues to tempt him to return to his former sinful lifestyle throughout the course of this life. Finally, the article will contend that viewing believers through the lenses of the dual nature view shapes one’s understanding of practical sanctification in several important ways. Who is the Speaker in Romans 7:7-25? Three options for the speaker in Romans 7:7-25 have been proposed.1 First, some have proposed the theory of the Rhetorical “I”. According to this view, the pronoun “I” in Romans 7:7-25 serves as a literary device that depicts all of humanity. Thus, the “I” is not autobiographical but rather represents the experience of everyone. Second, others have proposed the theory of the Representative “I”. According to this view, the pronoun “I” in Romans 7:7-25 depicts the life experience of a representative figure that is typical of every person including the speaker. For example, the “I” of Romans 7:7-25 could represent the experience of Adam at the time of the fall.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiencing the Glory of God Genesis 28:10–19A Romans 8:12
    Andrew Kinoti Vermilion July 23, 2017 Experiencing the Glory of God Genesis 28:10–19a Romans 8:12–25 The Hebrew word for glory is Kabod, usually used in connection with God. Its basic meaning is “weight” or “importance.” It is the term that has been used to describe the importance or the significance of God when encountered by the humans. Mainly the term is used when God reveals God-self to humans eliciting a complete sense of awe and excitement. When God reveals the divine-self, there is a sense of glow that that accompanies it, bringing with it a spontaneous realization of the divine presence. It is this sense of glow that may have led English to translate this term as glory. That means an extra-ordinary shining that can only be majestically divine. In Old Testament we see several examples where the glory of God shines upon specific people. Patriarchs of Israel (Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob) all had those instances where they experienced the presence of God in their own specific ways. We also see God revealing the Divine-self to Moses in the burning bush experience, as he is sent to redeem the Israelites from Egypt. It is the same glory of God that follows the Israelites in their exodus journey in a form of “cloud of fire.” In these examples, among many others, we see God’s glory shining upon a particular person with immediate realization of the divine experience. When these individuals experience the glory of God they react in a way of worship.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruciformed ! Mark's Story of Jesus and His Disciples
    CRUCIFORMED ! MARK’S STORY OF JESUS AND HIS DISCIPLES A literary study of the narrative of Mark’s Gospel with insights and conversation starters in twenty sessions A resource for the Book of Faith initiative within the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America THE REV. DR. MARK I. WEGENER RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA [email protected] Copyright © 2015 This page is intentionally left blank so you can photocopy the pages back-to- back without losing the sequence. CRUCIFORMED ! MARK’S STORY OF JESUS AND HIS DISCIPLES From all inductions, the gospel according to Mark is the first to call the story of Jesus a St. Mark is the earliest of the four gospels in “gospel.” At that time “gospel” or “evangel” the New Testament. Most likely it was written was almost a technical term for an official around 70 CE, shortly before or after the announcement that a new emperor was arriv- Roman armies captured Jerusalem and de- ing, or that a city or territory was to receive stroyed the temple. special treatment, such as a reduction in taxes. Of course, no one knows exactly who wrote Perhaps the political connotation of “gospel” this document. Traditionally the name of is why the accounts of Matthew, Luke and John Mark, a companion of both the apostles John do not explicitly refer to themselves as Paul and Peter, has been associated with it. “gospels.” But the evidence that this person is the actual author is slim at a best. Third, Mark provided the pattern which was later used by the authors of Matthew and And exactly where it was written and for Luke.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feast of the Annunciation
    1 Pope Shenouda III series 5 THE FEAST OF THE ANNUNCIATION BY HIS HOLINESS AMBA SHENOUDA III, POPE AND PATRIARCH OF ALEXANDRIA AND OF THE APOSTOLIC SEE OF ALL THE PREDICATION OF SAINT MARK Translated from the Arabic first edition of April 1997 Available from: http://www.copticchurch.net 2 All rights are reserved to the author His Holiness Pope Shenouda III Pope and Patriarch of the See of Alexandria and of all the Predication of the Evangelist St. Mark Name of the book: The Feast of the Annunciation Author: His Holiness Pope Shenouda III Editor: Orthodox Coptic Clerical College, Cairo First Edition: April 1997 Press: Amba Rueiss, (Offset) - The Cathedral - Abbassia Deposition number at "The Library": 97 / 475 977 - 5345 - 38 In the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, the One God, Amen. You will read in this pamphlet about the Annunciation of the Nativity of Christ, glory be to Him, and the annunciations which preceded and succeeded it. It is the annunciation of salvation for the world. It is the first feast of the Lord. It is an annunciation of love, because the reason of the Incarnation and Redemption is the love of God for the world. The Lord Christ has offered to us rejoicing annunciations and has presented God to us as a loving Father. What shall we then announce to people? Let there be in your mouths, all of you, a rejoicing annunciation for everybody. Pope Shenouda III 3 The feast of the Annunciation comes every year on the 29th of Baramhat.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Should Christians Obey the Government? Mark 12:13-17
    1 Should Christians Obey The Government? Mark 12:13-17 Introduction: 1) It is one of those questions that Christians have discussed and debated for 2000 years. Regardless of one’s political loyalties and commitments, the questions come up again and again and must be faced by every believer: should I as a Christian, a devoted follower of Jesus Christ my King, obey the government? In this context Mark Dever raises an even bigger question, “Does Christianity have a vision for the state and society as a whole?” Is a biblical vision one like “the Moral Majority,” the social gospel”, or the Amish? 2) This question, of course, is much easier to answer when you live in a democracy and/or the winds of governmental laws and policies are blowing in your direction. But…what if you live in a totalitarian context? What if you are subjected to a cruel and tyrannical dictatorship? Or, even within a free democracy, what do you do when asked to violate scripture or conscience? What then? 3) We are in the midst of a series of controversies between Jesus and the religious leaders in Jerusalem. Mark 11:20-13:37 is one long and crucial day in the life of Jesus and His disciples. There are 5 confrontations all-together: 1) The question of His authority by the Sanhedrin 11:27-33. 2) The question of paying taxes by the Pharisees and Herodians 12:13-17. 3) The question of the resurrection by the Sadducees 12:18-27. 4) The question of the greatest commandment by the scribes 12:28-34.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROAD of the RIGHTEOUS Expositional Study of Romans Romans 16:21-27 Written by ©Pastor Marty Baker March 29, 2020
    The Book of Romans Romans 16 THE ROAD OF THE RIGHTEOUS Expositional Study Of Romans Romans 16:21-27 Written By ©Pastor Marty Baker March 29, 2020 hen Liz an I married in May of 1980, I took a job for one year working for Ireland Landscape in Stockton, CA. One day as I headed to my truck after taking care of the W turf at an apartment complex, I watched as a blond, long-haired, muscle-bound, tattooed mean-looking dude walked away from a car near me. As he walked away from the vehicle, I noticed he had left a book on the roof of the car. So, I yelled, “Hey, man, I think you left something on the top of your car.” When the blue book turned out to be a Bible, I started talking more in depth with him. That book, which I still have today, turned out to be the Bible he received while a prisoner in San Quentin Penitentiary. His name was Alan Reasoner and he loved that Bible because he came to know Christ as his Savior in that pen. Eventually, I got him a job working with me, so for the next year I discipled him, and he taught me much about life and dealing with really rough, wicked people. In the summer of 1981, Liz and I moved to Dallas so I could attend Dallas Theological Seminary. I hated leaving Alan, who was now my best friend, but I had to move on. I counseled him how to live for Christ, how to avoid temptation, and how to stay strong in his faith and he said he would give it his best effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark 12:1-12 ‘Murder in the Vineyard’
    Mark 12:1-12 ‘murder in the vineyard’ We’re turning this morning to Mark 12. It’s one of be sent by God (you can read all about it in those chapters that we dip into from time to time – Deuteronomy 18). there are bits of it that are very well known. We’re all That said, their motives were not pure – and their familiar with the saying in verse 17: ‘Give to Caesar minds were closed to the real facts. Basically, they what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s.” were out to get him. They wanted to nail something The other obvious one is in verses 29-31 where Jesus on to him! focuses on the two great commandments – these So that’s the situation as we find it right here … and were culled from the heart of the Old Testament … in it’s in that context that Jesus told them this parable, a fact, Jewish people recite the first part every day, it’s story with a very clear punchline. Jesus showed them called the Shema. It’s all about loving the Lord and where their sins were leading them … and it certainly giving him first place in our affections. wasn’t heavenward. The bottom line is, if you receive Jesus deals with 4 big questions in the chapter – the God’s blessing but reject his Son, you must face God’s first is the Question of authority, and that goes down judgment. to verse 12; the second is the Question of The story here is meant to impact upon their hearts responsibility, and that’s in verses 13-17; the third is a and lives – in it, Jesus described something of the question about eternity, and that’s in verses 18-27; hope of God for his people – the divine aspiration, as the fourth is the Question of priority, and that’s in it were; he also showed the kindness of God for his verses 18-34.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading the Gospels for Lent
    Reading the Gospels for Lent 2/26 John 1:1-14; Luke 1 Birth of John the Baptist 2/27 Matthew 1; Luke 2:1-38 Jesus’ birth 2/28 Matthew 2; Luke 2:39-52 Epiphany 2/29 Matthew 3:1-12; Mark 1:1-12; Luke 3:1-20; John 1:15-28 John the Baptist 3/2 Matthew 3:13-4:11; Mark 1:9-13; Luke 3:20-4:13; John 1:29-34 Baptism & Temptation 3/3 Matthew 4:12-25; Mark 1:14-45; Luke 4:14-5:16; John 1:35-51 Calling Disciples 3/4 John chapters 2-4 First miracles 3/5 Matthew 9:1-17; Mark 2:1-22; Luke 5:17-39; John 5 Dining with tax collectors 3/6 Matthew 12:1-21; Mark 2:23-3:19; Luke 6:1-19 Healing on the Sabbath 3/7 Matthew chapters 5-7; Luke 6:20-49 7 11:1-13 Sermon on the Mount 3/9 Matthew 8:1-13; & chapter 11; Luke chapter 7 Healing centurion’s servant 3/10 Matthew 13; Luke 8:1-12; Mark 4:1-34 Kingdom parables 3/11 Matthew 8:15-34 & 9:18-26; Mark 4:35-5:43; Luke 8:22-56 Calming sea; Legion; Jairus 3/12 Matthew 9:27-10:42; Mark 6:1-13; Luke 9:1-6 Sending out the Twelve 3/13 Matthew 14; Mark 6:14-56; Luke 9:7-17; John 6:1-24 Feeding 5000 3/14 John 6:25-71 3/16 Matthew 15 & Mark 7 Canaanite woman 3/17 Matthew 16; Mark 8; Luke 9:18-27 “Who do people say I am?” 3/18 Matthew 17; Mark 9:1-23; Luke 9:28-45 Transfiguration 3/19 Matthew 18; Mark 9:33-50 Luke 9:46-10:54 Who is the greatest? 3/20 John chapters 7 & 8 Jesus teaches in Jerusalem 3/21 John chapters 9 & 10 Good Shepherd 3/23 Luke chapters 12 & 13 3/24 Luke chapters 14 & 15 3/25 Luke 16:1-17:10 3/26 John 11 & Luke 17:11-18:14 3/27 Matthew 19:1-20:16; Mark 10:1-31; Luke 18:15-30 Divorce & other teachings 3/28
    [Show full text]
  • Romans 7: an Old Covenant Struggle Seen Through New Covenant Eyes
    MSJ 30/2 (Fall 2019) 277–302 ROMANS 7: AN OLD COVENANT STRUGGLE SEEN THROUGH NEW COVENANT EYES Jay Street, ThM The Master’s Seminary Romans 7 is possibly one of the most cherished texts in church history. But it is also one of the most controversial passages in Scripture. Many resonate with Paul’s ambivalence and insist that Paul is speaking about the Christian’s daily struggle with sin. Others strongly disagree and purport that Paul’s struggle is too defeating for the Christian life, and he must be speaking for unbelievers. However, it will be argued in this article that both sides of the debate have been speaking past each other for centuries because both sides are asking the wrong question. This is not a passage about whether Paul is speaking as a Christian or not, but whether Paul is speaking as someone under the Old Covenant or the New Covenant. Thus, when the reader’s perspective is properly adjusted, he can rightly ascertain Paul’s spiritual status in the passage—Paul is speaking as a believer under the Old Covenant before the inauguration of the New Covenant. * * * * * Introduction Most people do not realize it, but their vision is clouded. This is not referring to physical blindness or short-sightedness, but to the popular evangelical perception of one biblical passage—Romans 7:14–25. Today, this text is as popular as it is contro- versial.1 Not only is the passage well-known, it has actually been one of the most cherished biblical texts in history. This is especially the case for those who have ad- vocated that Romans 7 conveys the Christian’s battle with sin, because many have discovered an inviting home in this emotional, heart-wrenching text.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesus As the Son of Man in Mark Andres A
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 3-24-2014 Jesus as the Son of Man in Mark Andres A. Tejada-Lalinde [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI14040867 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, History of Christianity Commons, and the Jewish Studies Commons Recommended Citation Tejada-Lalinde, Andres A., "Jesus as the Son of Man in Mark" (2014). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1175. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1175 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida JESUS AS THE SON OF MAN IN MARK A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in RELIGIOUS STUDIES by Andrés Tejada-Lalinde 2014 To: Dean Kenneth G. Furton College of Arts and Sciences This thesis, written by Andrés Tejada-Lalinde, and entitled Jesus as the Son of Man in Mark, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this thesis and recommend that it be approved. Ana María Bidegain Christine Gudorf Erik Larson, Major Professor Date of Defense: March 24, 2014. The thesis of Andrés Tejada-Lalinde is approved. Dean Kenneth G. Furton College of Arts and Sciences Dean Lakshmi N.
    [Show full text]
  • Kidron Mennonite Church Lent 2021 Gospel Reading Plan X Day
    Kidron Mennonite Church Lent 2021 Gospel Reading Plan March 11 Luke 4-Luke 6 This Lent reading plan walks through each of the four Gospels during the Lent season. What better way to prepare for Easter than to read the March 12 Luke 7-Luke 9 complete story of Jesus' birth, life, death and resurrection? Sunday March 13 Luke 10-Luke 12 sermons will come from the previous week’s readings. X March 14 Take a Break X Day Today's Scripture Reading March 15 Luke 13-Luke 14 February 17 Matthew 1-3 March 16 Luke 15-Luke 16 February 18 Matthew 4-6 March 17 Luke 17-Luke 18 February 19 Matthew 7-9 March 18 Luke 19-Luke 20 February 20 Matthew 10-Matthew 12 March 19 Luke 21-Luke 22 X February 21 Take a Break March 20 Luke 23-Luke 24 February 22 Matthew 13-Matthew 14 X March 21 Take a Break February 23 Matthew 15-Matthew 16 March 22 John 1-John 2 February 24 Matthew 17-Matthew 18 March 23 John 3-John 4 February 25 Matthew 19-Matthew 20 March 24 John 5-John 6 February 26 Matthew 21-Matthew 22 March 25 John 7-John 8 February 27 Matthew 23-Matthew 24 March 26 John 9-John 10 X February 28 Take a Break March 27 John 11-John 12 March 1 Matthew 25-Matthew 26 X March 28 Take a Break March 2 Matthew 27-Matthew 28 March 29 John 13-John 14 March 3 Mark 1-Mark 3 March 30 John 15-John 16 March 4 Mark 4-Mark 6 March 31 John 17-John 18 March 5 Mark 7-Mark 9 April 1 John 19-John 20 March 6 Mark 10-Mark 12 April 2 John 21 X March 7 Take a Break April 3 1 Corinthians 15 March 8 Mark 13-Mark 14 X April 4 It's Easter! March 9 Mark 15-Mark 16 The reading plan is graciously made available by the Central Presbyterian Church of Baltimore.
    [Show full text]