DOCSLIB.ORG

Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme (FARRRS) Phase Two

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme (FARRRS) Phase Two Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme (FARRRS) Phase Two Environmental Statement Volume II: Historic Environment Technical Appendix F Document Reference: MM - 337339 - ENV - 023 May 2016 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme (FARRRS) Phase Two 337339 EMP 1 A http://pims01/pims/llisapi.dll?func=ll&objId=1564796763&objAction=brow se&viewType=1 February 2016 Environmental Statement Volume II: Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route (FARRRS) Phase EnvironmentalHistoric Environment Statement Volume Technical II - Historic Appendix Environment F Technical Ap Document Reference: MM - 337339 - ENV - 023 May 2016 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Civic Office Waterdale, Doncaster, South Yorkshire DN1 3BU Mott MacDonald, Mott MacDonald House, 111 St Mary's Road, Sheffield S2 4AP, United Kingdom T +44 (0)114 2761242 W www.mottmac.com Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme (FARRRS) Phase Two Volume II - Historic Environment Technical Appendix F Issue and Revision Record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description J. Williams A April 2016 P. Adams M. Staniland First draft for Client comment G. Middleton J. Williams B May 2016 P. Adams M. Staniland Final for issue G. Middleton Information class: StandardStandard This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned document being relied upon by any other party, or being used project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission used for any other purpose. which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it. 337339/ENV/023/B May 2016 Volume II – Historic Environment Technical Appendix F – Rev B Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme (FARRRS) Phase Two Volume II - Historic Environment Technical Appendix F Contents Chapter Title Page Abbreviations Glossary 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme (FARRRS) Phase Two __________________ 1 1.2 Introduction to Historic Environment _____________________________________________________ 2 1.3 Legislation, Policy and Guidance _______________________________________________________ 2 2 Approach and Methodology 5 2.1 Introduction ________________________________________________________________________ 5 2.2 Scope of the Assessment _____________________________________________________________ 5 2.3 Methodology _______________________________________________________________________ 6 2.4 Assessment Criteria _________________________________________________________________ 8 2.5 Assumptions and Limitations __________________________________________________________ 10 3 Baseline 12 3.1 Introduction _______________________________________________________________________ 12 3.2 Existing Baseline Conditions __________________________________________________________ 12 3.3 Site Conditions ____________________________________________________________________ 13 3.4 Archaeological Investigations _________________________________________________________ 13 3.5 Cartographic Sources _______________________________________________________________ 15 3.6 Archaeological and Historical Background _______________________________________________ 18 3.7 Built Heritage ______________________________________________________________________ 24 3.8 Historic Landscape Character _________________________________________________________ 24 4 Prediction of Effects 26 4.1 Introduction _______________________________________________________________________ 26 4.2 Works with Potential to Affect the Historic Environment _____________________________________ 26 4.3 Predicted Residual Effects ___________________________________________________________ 26 4.4 Cumulative Effects __________________________________________________________________ 29 5 Conclusions 31 5.1 Summary of Assessment_____________________________________________________________ 31 5.2 Significant Residual Effects ___________________________________________________________ 31 5.3 Compliance with Planning Policy ______________________________________________________ 32 5.4 Climate Change Adaptation __________________________________________________________ 32 6 References 33 337339/ENV/023/B May 2016 Volume II – Historic Environment Technical Appendix F – Rev B Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme (FARRRS) Phase Two Volume II - Historic Environment Technical Appendix F Annex 36 A. Designated Assets within the Study Area ________________________________________________ 37 Tables Table 2.1: Details of consultation ________________________________________________________________ 6 Table 2.2: Assessment of heritage sensitivity ______________________________________________________ 8 Table 2.3: Magnitude of impact _________________________________________________________________ 9 Table 2.4: Significance of effects ________________________________________________________________ 9 Table 3.1: Cartographic data __________________________________________________________________ 15 Table 3.2: South Yorkshire HEC _______________________________________________________________ 25 Table A.1: Scheduled Monuments within 1km of the Scheme _________________________________________ 37 Table A.2: Listed Buildings within 1km of the Scheme _______________________________________________ 38 Table A.3: Non-designated assets within 1km of the Scheme _________________________________________ 40 Table A.4: Archaeological investigations within 1km of the Scheme ____________________________________ 42 337339/ENV/023/B May 2016 Volume II – Historic Environment Technical Appendix F – Rev B Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme (FARRRS) Phase Two Volume II - Historic Environment Technical Appendix F Abbreviations AD Anno Domini (After Christ) BC Before Christ BP Before Present (1950) Cal BC Calibrated Before Christ (Radiocarbon date) CIfA Chartered Institute for Archaeologists DBA Desk-Based Assessment DMBC Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council DMRB Design Manual for Roads and Bridges DRPPA Doncaster Roman Pottery Production Area EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ES Environmental Statement ha hectare HE Historic England HEC Historic Environment Characterisation ibid Ibidem (see glossary) LB Listed Building LDF CS Local Development Framework Core Strategy m metre NGR National Grid Reference NHLE (HE) National Heritage List for England NMP National Mapping Programme NPPF National Planning Policy Framework OS Ordnance Survey RBF Rossington Bridge Farm RBPS Rossington Bridge Pumping Station RHADS Robin Hood Airport Doncaster Sheffield SM Scheduled Monument SMR Sites and Monuments Record i 337339/ENV/023/B May 2016 Volume II – Historic Environment Technical Appendix F – Rev B Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme (FARRRS) Phase Two Volume II - Historic Environment Technical Appendix F SYAS South Yorkshire Archaeological Advisory Service UDP Unitary Development Plan ii 337339/ENV/023/B May 2016 Volume II – Historic Environment Technical Appendix F – Rev B Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme (FARRRS) Phase Two Volume II - Historic Environment Technical Appendix F Glossary A road/track that serves a piece of land or residential property Access road or track which is not considered a public highway. Alluvial deposits Soils formed by deposition within rivers. Land that has been continually wooded since at least the year Ancient woodland 1600. A programme of archaeological supervision during work Archaeological conducted by a non-archaeologist, whereby an archaeologist monitoring watches machine excavation in order to identify archaeological remains. A process by which information about effects of a proposed plan, Assessment project or intervention is collected, assessed and used to inform decision-making. The environment as it appears (or would appear) immediately prior to the implementation of the Scheme together with any Baseline conditions known or foreseeable future changes that will take place before completion of the Scheme. Bedrock Soils or rocks older than Quaternary deposits. A structure or building of historic value. These structures are Built heritage visible above ground level. Buried archaeological Heritage asset beneath ground level, which may include remains earthworks. Cartographic data Map sources consulted to inform the baseline Measurement (in metres) along the Scheme. Starting at 0m at the Chainage western end and increasing towards the east. Measures taken to make up for the loss of, or permanent damage to, biological resources through the provision of replacement areas. Any replacement area should be similar to or, with Compensation appropriate management, have the ability to reproduce the ecological functions and conditions of those biological resources that have been lost or damaged. An area designated under section 69 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 as being of special Conservation area architectural or historic interest and with a character or appearance which is desirable to preserve or enhance. iii 337339/ENV/023/B May 2016 Volume II – Historic Environment Technical Appendix F – Rev
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planning Committee
    PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA Meeting to be held in The Ceres Suite, Worksop Town Hall, S80 2AH on Wednesday, 13th September 2017 at 6.30 p.m. (Please note time and venue) Please turn mobile telephones to silent during meetings. In case of emergency, Members/officers can be contacted on the Council's mobile telephone: 07940 001 705. In accordance with the Openness of Local Government Bodies Regulations 2014, audio/visual recording and photography at Council meetings is permitted in accordance with the Council’s protocol ‘Filming of Public Meetings’. 1 PLANNING COMMITTEE Membership 2017/18 Councillors D. K. Brett, H. Burton, G. Clarkson, S. Fielding, G. Freeman, K. H. Isard, G. A. N. Oxby, D. G. Pidwell, M. W. Quigley, S. Scotthorne, A. K. Smith and T. Taylor. Substitute Members: None Quorum: 3 Members Lead Officer for this Meeting Fiona Dunning Administrator for this Meeting Julie Hamilton NOTE FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC (a) Please do not take photographs or make any recordings during the meeting without the prior agreement of the Chair. (b) Letters attached to Committee reports reflect the views of the authors and not necessarily the views of the District Council. 2 PLANNING COMMITTEE Wednesday, 13th September 2017 AGENDA 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST BY MEMBERS AND OFFICERS * (pages 5 - 6) (Members’ and Officers’ attention is drawn to the attached notes and form) (a) Members (b) Officers 3. MINUTES OF MEETING HELD ON 16TH AUGUST 2017 * (pages 7 - 14) 4. MINUTES OF PLANNING CONSULTATION GROUP MEETINGS HELD BETWEEN 17th AND 31ST JULY 2017* (pages 15 - 26) 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Thorne Moors :A Palaeoecological Study of A
    T...o"..e MO<J "S " "",Ae Oe COlOOIC'" S T<.OY OF A e"ONZE AGE slTE - .. "c euc~ , A"O a • n ,• THORNE MOORS :A PALAEOECOLOGICAL STUDY OF A BRONZE AGE SITE A contribution to the history of the British Insect fauna P.c. Buckland, Department of Geography, University of Birmingham. © Authors Copyright ISBN ~o. 0 7044 0359 5 List of Contents Page Introduction 3 Previous research 6 The archaeological evidence 10 The geological sequence 19 The samples 22 Table 1 : Insect remains from Thorne Moors 25 Environmental interpretation 41 Table 2 : Thorne Moors : Trackway site - pollen and spores from sediments beneath peat and from basal peat sample 42 Table 3 Tho~ne Moors Plants indicated by the insect record 51 Table 4 Thorne Moors pollen from upper four samples in Sphagnum peat (to current cutting surface) 64 Discussion : the flooding mechanism 65 The insect fauna : notes on particular species 73 Discussion : man, climate and the British insect fauna 134 Acknowledgements 156 Bibliography 157 List of Figures Frontispiece Pelta grossum from pupal chamber in small birch, Thorne Moors (1972). Age of specimen c. 2,500 B.P. 1. The Humberhead Levels, showing Thorne and Hatfield Moors and the principal rivers. 2 2. Thorne Moors the surface before peat extraction (1975). 5 3. Thorne Moors the same locality after peat cutting (1975). 5 4. Thorne Moors location of sites examined. 9 5. Thorne Moors plan of trackway (1972). 12 6. Thorne Moors trackway timbers exposed in new dyke section (1972) • 15 7. Thorne Moors the trackway and peat succession (1977).
    [Show full text]
  • 39. Humberhead Levels Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 39. Humberhead Levels Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 39. Humberhead Levels Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • Thorne Inset Campsall and Norton Inset Mexborough Inset Doncaster's
    M L B D a S o Elmsa South Elmsall n s e s W ay ll L o T w 496 to Wakefield e T 408 405 For continuation of 301 to Askern 84b to Sykehouse u e n he d n a A Kirk 2 bb L Thorne Road e w a A1 L e n A L 51 B ’s W C a D Kirkton La E 409 407.X45 M 8877 d o A alk C 87a87a Field Lane e services in this area see n E For continuation of a r 6 t g h r Thorne Inset Northgate 3 a e Bramwith a o t h 303 51a n Burghwallis R u o r 8 g a 412 ckley 84 s R h i 301 s r Lan Campsall and Norton inset right r t e h c services in this area 303 a G 84b d 8 r h R 8 Ha L l D t H R 84b ig 303 e o o S 84a a h 8a o ll R a H n n 8787 see Thorne inset right fi c a d t 8a d M 84a e 8 8a 87 87a a St. a 496 d La . a gh s 303 Owston ne 84b z t e e id d 87a87a H 8877 r Thorpe 84 l e d 84 a R l o R n o 301 e R 87a87a d . 87a87a . L a a ne Skellow r d a a in Balne e L M n 301 t L A e s La e Hazel i a Stainforth l 6 t ll .
    [Show full text]
  • River Torne Catchment 2019/20
    River Torne Catchment 2019/20 Jamie McEwan 2 | P a g e Executive summary A series of 'Aspirational projects' have been developed by the Torne Catchment partnership over a number of meetings. This document addresses the need to be able to summarise potential projects by their multiple benefits, costs and relevance to available funding. True to the Catchment based approach it allows us to work effectively together combining resources to progress projects from an idea and enable the effective delivery of WFD and multiple benefits for the catchment. Developed by the partnership this document provides a list of projects summarising the relative contributions each project makes towards WFD funding themes and the partnership aims. It also provides a more detailed overview for each project outlining the status, lead partner, management and location of each project alongside its relevance to the funding themes and estimated cost. Within project descriptions further detail can be found for project justification, next steps for progress, and context. Appended is a blank project template detailing how partners can go about putting forward a new idea to be considered as a project for the catchment. Through partnership review and reporting this becomes a live document and process to help support a shared vision, clarity of purpose and the ability of the partnership to act fast on relevant opportunities. Ultimately this document will be an effective way of allowing all members of the partnership to contribute toward the development of the catchment. A project idea from its beginning can be brought forward to the partnership and its progress tracked to completion eventually forming a portfolio for the Torne Catchment partnership as well as an active and aspirational document.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications List
    Doncaster & District Family History Society Publications List August 2020 Parishes & Townships in the Archdeaconry of Doncaster in 1914 Notes The Anglican Diocese of Sheffield was formed in 1914 and is divided into two Archdeaconries. The map shows the Parishes within the Archdeaconry of Doncaster at that time. This publication list shows Parishes and other Collections that Doncaster & District Family History Society has transcribed and published in the form of Portable Document Files (pdf). Downloads Each Parish file etc with a reference number can be downloaded from the Internet using: www.genfair.co.uk (look for the Society under suppliers) at a cost of £6 each. Postal Sales The files can also be supplied by post on a USB memory stick. The cost is £10 each. The price includes the memory stick, one file and postage & packing. (The memory stick can be reused once you have loaded the files onto your own computer). Orders and payment by cheque through: D&DFHS Postal Sales, 18 Newbury Way, Cusworth, Doncaster, DN5 8PY Additional files at £6 each can be included on a single USB memory stick (up to a total of 4 files depending on file sizes). Example: One USB memory stick with “Adlingfleet” Parish file Ref: 1091 = £10. 1st Additional file at £6: the above plus “Adwick le Street” Ref: 1112 = Total £16. 2nd Additional file at £6: “The Poor & the Law” Ref: 1125 = Total £22 Postage included. We can also arrange payment by BACs, but for card and non-sterling purchases use Genfair While our limited stocks last we will also supply files in the form of a CD at £6 each plus postage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy 2014- 2028
    The Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy 2014- 2028 Creating a Greener, Healthier & more Attractive Borough Adoption Version April 2014 Doncaster Council Service Improvement & Policy (Regeneration & Environment) 0 1 the potential of the Limestone Valley, which runs through the west of the borough. Did you know that Doncaster has 65 different woodlands which cover an area in excess of 521 hectares? That’s about the equivalent to over 1,000 football pitches. There are 88 different formal open spaces across the borough, which include football, rugby and cricket pitches, greens, courts and athletics tracks. Doncaster is also home to 12 golf courses. The Trans-Pennine Trail passes through Doncaster and is integral to the extensive footpath and cycle network that link the borough’s communities with the countryside, jobs and recreation opportunities. There are so Foreword from the many more features across Doncaster and these are covered within this Strategy document. Portfolio Holder… Despite this enviable position that communities in Doncaster enjoy, there is always so much more that can be done to make the borough’s GI even greater. The Strategy sets out a framework As Portfolio Holder for Environment & Waste at for ensuring maximum investment and funding Doncaster Council, I am delighted to introduce is being channelled, both by the Council and the the Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy vast array of important partners who invest so 2014-2028: Creating a Greener, Healthier & much time and resources, often voluntarily, into more Attractive Borough. making our GI as good as it can be. As the largest metropolitan Borough in the This Strategy will help deliver a better country, covering over 220 square miles, connected network of multi-purpose spaces and Doncaster has an extensive green infrastructure provide the opportunity for the coordination (GI) network which includes numerous assets and delivery of environmental improvements and large areas that are rural in character.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Baseline Survey of Land at Finningley Quarry, South Yorkshire / Nottinghamshire LAF.FQ Lafarge Aggregates
    Lafarge Aggregates Ltd ECOLOGICAL BASELINE SURVEY OF LAND AT FINNINGLEY QUARRY, SOUTH YORKSHIRE / NOTTINGHAMSHIRE FINAL- VERSION 2 FEBRUARY 2014 ESL (Ecological Services) Ltd, 1 Otago House, Allenby Business Village, Crofton Road, Lincoln, LN3 4NL Ecological Baseline Survey of Land at Finningley Quarry, South Yorkshire / Nottinghamshire LAF.FQ Lafarge Aggregates DOCUMENT CONTROL TITLE: Ecological Baseline Survey of Land at Finningley Quarry, South Yorkshire / Nottinghamshire VERSION: Final – Version 2 DATE: February 2014 ISSUED BY: Brian Hedley AUTHORS: Peter Morrell and Brian Hedley CHECKED BY: Andrew Malkinson APPROVED BY: Vanessa Tindale ISSUED TO: David Park Restoration Manager Lafarge Aggregates Ltd Thrislington Quarry West Cornforth County Durham DL17 9EY Paul Clarke David L Walker Limited Albion House 89 Station Road Eckington Sheffield S21 4FW This report has been prepared by ESL with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, within the terms of the contract with the Client. The report is confidential to the Client. ESL accepts no responsibility of whatever nature to third parties to whom this report may be made known. No part of this document may be reproduced without the prior written approval of ESL. ESL (Ecological Services) Ltd, 1 Otago House, Allenby Business Village, Crofton Road, Lincoln, LN3 4NL Ecological Baseline Survey of Land at Finningley Quarry, South Yorkshire / Nottinghamshire LAF.FQ Lafarge Aggregates CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 DESK STUDY 1 3 HABITATS, PLANT COMMUNITIES AND PLANT SPECIES 3 3.1 Survey Methods
    [Show full text]
  • FINNINGLEY QUARRY EXTENSION, (Phases 25, 26, 27, 29 & 30) FINNINGLEY, SOUTH YORKSHIRE and MISSON, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
    FINNINGLEY QUARRY EXTENSION, (Phases 25, 26, 27, 29 & 30) FINNINGLEY, SOUTH YORKSHIRE AND MISSON, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE An Archaeological Desktop Assessment for Lafarge Aggregates Ltd Authors: L.Elliott, L.Platt & Peter Webb 2012 (Revised 2013) © Trent and Peak Archaeology Code: FME North Nottinghamshire and Finningley 1610 Trent & Peak Archaeology © Unit 1, Holly Lane Chilwell Nottingham NG9 4AB 0115 8967400 (Tel.) 0115 925 9464 (Fax.) Trent & Peak Archaeology is a trading name of York Registered Office: A Company Limited by Guarantee Archaeological Trust Registered Charity in England and 47 Aldwark, York YO1 7BX Without Share Capital Registered Wales (No. 509060) and Scotland (No. SCO42846) in England No. 1430801 Finningley Quarry Extension 2012 SUMMARY This report comprises an assessment of the archaeological potential for the proposed areas of extraction at Finningley Quarry in line with best practice recommended within the National Planning Policy Framework Section 12 (March 2012). The five proposed extensions fall within the parishes of Finningley, South Yorkshire (phases 26, 27, 30 & part of 29) and Misson, Nottinghamshire (Phase 25 & most of 29). Phase 28 to be crossed by the haulage route to the plant site (and the subject of previous evaluation), also lies in Finningley parish, South Yorkshire. One designated heritage asset listed on the South Yorkshire SMR (SMR01832) comprising three flints and one heritage asset listed on the NMR (320789) comprising thirty flints lie within phase 26 of the proposed extension. No heritage assets listed on the Nottinghamshire HER are present within the proposed extension phases. Within the wider study area of the existing quarry and adjacent areas a number of heritage assets or themes were assessed as holding significant archaeological potential, necessitating further consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 March 2005 3. Title: Response To
    ROTHERHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL – REPORT TO MEMBERS 1. Meeting: Economic and Development Cabinet Member Delegated Powers Meeting 2. Date: 7 March 2005 3. Title: Response to the Coalfields Communities Campaign regarding the Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme 4. Programme Area: Economic and Development Services/Chief Executive’s Office 5. Summary A request has been received from the Coalfield Communities Campaign asking for Rotherham’s views on the Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme (FARRRS) in Doncaster. The report sets out the background and concludes that only qualified support can be given at this time. 6. Recommendations That: (a) the Council offer its qualified support to FARRRS for the reasons given in the report, and (b) a copy of this report is forwarded to Councillor S. Wright as Rotherham’s representative on the CCC. 7. Proposals and Details At the Coalfields Communities Campaign (CCC) meeting on the 21 January 2005, Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council (DMBC) asked for the support of CCC for DMBC’s efforts to secure funding and planning approval for the Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Routes Schemes (FARRRS). Members asked for more information before taking a view and a briefing note was subsequently issued by DMBC (attached at Appendix A). The FARRRS project will provide a link road from junction 3 of the M18 motorway into Rossington and on to the Robin Hood Doncaster Sheffield Airport. It aims to facilitate the regeneration of the south east area of Doncaster and in due course enable the airport to expand. The briefing note supplied by Doncaster lists the benefits of the road scheme to the coalfield communities as follows: • Improves and enhances the growth of the airport and its role as a transformation project which assists the economic restructuring of the sub- region including numerous coalfield communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Doncaster Local Plan: Archaeological Scoping Assessment
    Doncaster Local Plan: Archaeological Scoping Assessment Allocation Reference: 501 Area (Ha): 0.53 Allocation Type: Housing NGR (centre): SE 6936 1566 Site Name: Adjacent 46 Marshlands Rd, Thorne Moorends Settlement: Thorne Moorends Allocation Recommendations Archaeological significance of site Unknown Historic landscape significance Negligible Suitability of site for allocation Uncertain archaeological constraint Summary Within site Within buffer zone Scheduled Monument - - Listed Building - - SMR record/event - 1 record Cropmark/Lidar evidence No Yes Cartographic features of interest No No Estimated sub-surface disturbance Low n/a www.archeritage.co.uk Page 1 of 3 Doncaster Local Plan: Archaeological Scoping Assessment Allocation Reference: 501 Area (Ha): 0.53 Allocation Type: Housing NGR (centre): SE 6936 1566 Site Name: Adjacent 46 Marshlands Rd, Thorne Moorends Settlement: Thorne Moorends Site assessment Known assets/character: The SMR does not record any features within the site. One findspot is recorded within the buffer zone, a Bronze Age flint arrowhead. No listed buildings or Scheduled Monuments are recorded within the site or buffer zone. The Magnesian Limestone in South and West Yorkshire Aerial Photographic Mapping Project records levelled ridge and furrow remains within the buffer zone. The Historic Environment Characterisation records the present character of the site as modern commercial core- suburban, probably associated with the construction of Moorends mining village in the first half of the 20th century. There is no legibility of the former parliamentary enclosure in this area. In the western part of the buffer, the landscape character comprises land enclosed from commons and drained in 1825, with changes to the layout between 1851 and 1891 in association with the construction of a new warping system.
    [Show full text]
  • Blaxton-Pc 10 10 2019 Redacted
    The following message has been applied automatically, to promote news and information from Nottinghamshire County Council about events and services: Got a question about recycling in Nottinghamshire? Check out our Check out our frequently asked questions. #RecycleForNotts Emails and any attachments from Nottinghamshire County Council are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the email, and then delete it without making copies or using it in any other way. Senders and recipients of email should be aware that, under the Data Protection Act 2018 and the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the contents may have to be disclosed in response to a request. Although any attachments to the message will have been checked for viruses before transmission, you are urged to carry out your own virus check before opening attachments, since the County Council accepts no responsibility for loss or damage caused by software viruses. You can view our privacy notice at: https://www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/global-content/privacy Nottinghamshire County Council Legal Disclaimer. 2 PARISH COUNCILS OF AUCKLEY, BLAXTON, BRANTON-WITH-CANTLEY AND FINNINGLEY (ALL PART OF DMBC FINNINGLEY WARD). JOINT COMMENTS IN RESPONSE TO CONSULATION ON THE NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL DRAFT MINERALS PLAN. Summary In isolation the proposals to develop sites at Austerfield, Misson, Barnby Moor and Scrooby seem innocuous, however when considered alongside existing and proposed developments in both Nottinghamshire and the DMBC area, we have serious concerns about the impact on our communities, particularly the potential increase in Heavy Goods and other vehicles on an already busy road network in and around our villages.
    [Show full text]