DOCSLIB.ORG

Wroot Road Quarry, Finningley, Doncaster, South Yorkshire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wroot Road Quarry, Finningley, Doncaster, South Yorkshire Wroot Road Quarry, Finningley, Doncaster, South Yorkshire An Archaeological Fieldwalking Survey for Yorkshire Aggregates Ltd by Andrew Mundin Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd Site Code WQD 03/80 October 2003 Summary Site name: Wroot Road Quarry, Finningley, Doncaster, South Yorkshire Grid reference: SE 6911 0043 Site activity: Fieldwalking Date and duration of project: 17th October 2003 Project manager: Steve Ford Site supervisor: Steve Ford Site code: WQD 03/80 Area of site: 5.4 ha Summary of results: Eight fragments of pottery and three stuck flints were recovered from the site. All the pottery was late post-medieval. One of the stuck flints is a late Neolithic oblique arrowhead. Monuments identified: None Location and reference of archive: The archive is currently held by Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd, 47-49 De Beauvoir Road, Reading, Berkshire, RG1 5NR and will be deposited with Doncaster Museum in due course. This report may be copied for bona fide research or planning purposes without the explicit permission of the copyright holder Report edited/checked by: Steve Ford 20.10.03 Steve Preston 21.10.03 i Wroot Road Quarry, Finningley, Doncaster, South Yorkshire An Archaeological Fieldwalking Survey by Andrew Mundin Report 03/80 Introduction This report documents the results of an archaeological fieldwalking survey carried out at Wroot Road Quarry, Finningley, Doncaster (SE 6911 0043) (Fig. 1). The work has been commissioned by Mr Chris Ballam of The Land and Development Practice, 1 Horsefair, Wetherby, Leeds, LS22 6JG, on behalf on Yorkshire Aggregates Ltd. Planning permission has been sought from Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council for mineral extraction on the site. To inform the planning process, the results of an archaeological evaluation are required to accompany the planning application as set out in Archaeology and Planning (PPG16 1990). This report documents a non-invasive evaluation to determine the presence/absence, extent, character, quality and date of any archaeological remains that may be affected by the expansion of the quarry. This fieldwork was undertaken by Andrew Mundin Steve Ford and Jo Pine on the 17th October 2003. Location, topography and geology The quarry in situated on Wroot Road, which lies c.1km north-east of Finningley, to the east of Doncaster. The proposal site lies immediately to the east of the current quarry workings (Figs. 1 and 2). The site lies on a glacial outwash plain. The underlying geology is Older River Gravel (BGS 1969) and lies at c. 5m above Ordnance Datum. The site is mostly flat but there is a slight hollow to the ground in the south-eastern corner of the site. Archaeological background The archaeological potential of the site has been highlighted in a brief prepared by Mr Roy Sykes of South Yorkshire Archaeological Service following the results of an earlier desk-based assessment (Sidebottom 2003). In summary although there is no known archaeology on or immediately adjacent to the application area there are a variety of cropmarks and finds present in the general area. The topographic position of the site, which was formerly adjacent to an extensive wetland area, is one which was favoured for earlier prehistoric occupation. 1 Objectives and methodology The aim of the fieldwalking was to recover artefacts that pre-dated the 19th century, from the surface of ground. These finds can originate from either buried archaeological deposits, which have been disturbed by ploughing, or from material that was always within the topsoil. The fieldwalking took place along north–south lines spaced at 10m intervals and based on the National Grid. Material was collected from units of 10m intervals along these lines with an average search width of 1m. This approximated to a 10% sample of the site. The methodology is comparable with that practised in regions of central southern England (Richards 1990; Ford 1987a, appendix 1). A record was made of the conditions under which the fieldwalking took place, as results can be influenced by factors such as vegetation cover and weather. The topography was also recorded to assist in the interpretation of the finds. Results A total area of 5.4ha was fieldwalked by 3 individuals. Collection conditions All of the fieldwalked area had been ploughed recently but had weathered well; the sandy, stoney soil was easily washed by light rain. Very little vegetation was present and the ground was dry. For most of the fieldwork the weather was overcast, but on occasion was sunny. Areas to the south and west were very stoney with less stone towards the north. Finds Stuck Flint by Steve Ford Just three prehistoric struck flints were recovered. These had been introduced to the site, as flint was not obviously available within the local gravel. The pieces comprised two flakes and an oblique arrowhead. One flake was iron stained, the other flake was lightly patinated and the arrowhead was surprisingly fresh. It cannot be determined if these differences of condition reflect material from different periods or simply very localized variations in soil conditions. The two flakes are not closely datable other than to a broad span of time representing the Mesolithic to the late Bronze Age. 2 In contrast, the oblique arrowhead is typical of the later Neolithic (Green 1980). It was well made but both the tip and part of the barb are missing. Pottery In all 8 sherds where recovered in the fieldwalking. All the sherds date from late post-medieval to modern times. Their distribution is shown in Figure 3. Of minor note was a sherd from a stoneware ginger-beer bottle produced in Sheffield. Of the remaining sherds, two were post-medieval red ware, one with a manganese glaze and five were mass produced white, or blue and white, glazed china of 19th or 20th century date. Tile A single small fragment of tile (2g) was recovered. Clay pipe Two pieces of clay pipe stem were recovered from the fieldwalking. Conclusion The fieldwalking has produced a very modest quantity of finds from two distinct periods, prehistoric and late post-medieval times. The stuck flint is of a little archaeological interest, but is not necessarily of significance for the possible presence of subsoil archaeological deposits on the site. The arrowhead in particular is likely to have arrived on the site during a hunting expedition. As the local geology does not appear to be flint-rich, it is possible that even low densities of flintwork may represent the presence of occupation/activity sites, with flint usage being conservative. In such situations, it is often difficult to distinguish between stray finds such as casually lost or discarded items from activities taking place within the wider landscape, or small occupation sites. However in this instance the density of flint finds recovered is so low, despite 10% coverage of the surface area that they cannot be interpreted as representing prehistoric occupation. The pottery and clay pipe are distinct as being relatively recent additions to the fields and were presumably incorporated within manure spread onto arable fields. They are of no archaeological significance. On the basis of the results of this non-invasive evaluation, the site does not appear to have any archaeological potential. 3 References BGS, 1969, British Geological Survey, 1:63,360, Sheet 88, Drift Edition, Keyworth Ford, S, 1987, The East Berkshire Archaeological Survey, Berkshire County Council Dept Highways Planning Occas Pap 1, Reading Green, H S, 1980, The Flint Arrowheads of the British Isles, BAR 75, Oxford PPG 16, 1990, Archaeology and Planning, Dept of the Environment Planning Policy Guidance 16, HMSO Richards, J C, 1990, The Stonehenge environs project, English Heritage Archaeol Rep 16 London Sidebottom, P, 2003, ‘Archaeological desk-based assessment on land adjacent to Wroot Road Quarry, Finningley, South Yorkshire’, P C Sidebottom Archaeological Consultancy, Sheffield 4 05000 Doncaster Barnsley Sheffield Rotherham SITE 04000 03000 02000 01000 Quarry SITE SE67000 68000 69000 70000 WQD03/80 Wroot Road Quarry, Finningley, South Yorkshire, 2003 An Archaeological Fieldwalking Survey Figure 1. Location of site on Wroot Road and South Yorkshire. Reproduced from Ordnance Survey Pathfinder 717 SE60/70 1:25000 Ordnance Survey Licence AL52324A0001 02000 02000 05000 Quarry 04000 03000 SITE SE68900 69000 69100 69200 WQD03/80 Wroot Road Quarry, Finningley, South Yorkshire, 2003 An Archaeological Fieldwalking Survey Figure 2. Location of site in relation to Wroot Road Quarry. Reproduced from Ordnance Survey Map at 1:2500 Ordnance Survey Licence AL52324A0001 Wroot Road Quarry, Finningley, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, 2003 N Conveyors 00500 Quarry 2 00400 SITE 00300 SE69000 69100 69200 KEY: Flint Tile Flake Pottery Arrowhead Clay pipe 0 100m Figure 3. Distribution of fieldwalking finds. WQD 03/80.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planning Committee
    PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA Meeting to be held in The Ceres Suite, Worksop Town Hall, S80 2AH on Wednesday, 13th September 2017 at 6.30 p.m. (Please note time and venue) Please turn mobile telephones to silent during meetings. In case of emergency, Members/officers can be contacted on the Council's mobile telephone: 07940 001 705. In accordance with the Openness of Local Government Bodies Regulations 2014, audio/visual recording and photography at Council meetings is permitted in accordance with the Council’s protocol ‘Filming of Public Meetings’. 1 PLANNING COMMITTEE Membership 2017/18 Councillors D. K. Brett, H. Burton, G. Clarkson, S. Fielding, G. Freeman, K. H. Isard, G. A. N. Oxby, D. G. Pidwell, M. W. Quigley, S. Scotthorne, A. K. Smith and T. Taylor. Substitute Members: None Quorum: 3 Members Lead Officer for this Meeting Fiona Dunning Administrator for this Meeting Julie Hamilton NOTE FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC (a) Please do not take photographs or make any recordings during the meeting without the prior agreement of the Chair. (b) Letters attached to Committee reports reflect the views of the authors and not necessarily the views of the District Council. 2 PLANNING COMMITTEE Wednesday, 13th September 2017 AGENDA 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST BY MEMBERS AND OFFICERS * (pages 5 - 6) (Members’ and Officers’ attention is drawn to the attached notes and form) (a) Members (b) Officers 3. MINUTES OF MEETING HELD ON 16TH AUGUST 2017 * (pages 7 - 14) 4. MINUTES OF PLANNING CONSULTATION GROUP MEETINGS HELD BETWEEN 17th AND 31ST JULY 2017* (pages 15 - 26) 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Thorne Moors :A Palaeoecological Study of A
    T...o"..e MO<J "S " "",Ae Oe COlOOIC'" S T<.OY OF A e"ONZE AGE slTE - .. "c euc~ , A"O a • n ,• THORNE MOORS :A PALAEOECOLOGICAL STUDY OF A BRONZE AGE SITE A contribution to the history of the British Insect fauna P.c. Buckland, Department of Geography, University of Birmingham. © Authors Copyright ISBN ~o. 0 7044 0359 5 List of Contents Page Introduction 3 Previous research 6 The archaeological evidence 10 The geological sequence 19 The samples 22 Table 1 : Insect remains from Thorne Moors 25 Environmental interpretation 41 Table 2 : Thorne Moors : Trackway site - pollen and spores from sediments beneath peat and from basal peat sample 42 Table 3 Tho~ne Moors Plants indicated by the insect record 51 Table 4 Thorne Moors pollen from upper four samples in Sphagnum peat (to current cutting surface) 64 Discussion : the flooding mechanism 65 The insect fauna : notes on particular species 73 Discussion : man, climate and the British insect fauna 134 Acknowledgements 156 Bibliography 157 List of Figures Frontispiece Pelta grossum from pupal chamber in small birch, Thorne Moors (1972). Age of specimen c. 2,500 B.P. 1. The Humberhead Levels, showing Thorne and Hatfield Moors and the principal rivers. 2 2. Thorne Moors the surface before peat extraction (1975). 5 3. Thorne Moors the same locality after peat cutting (1975). 5 4. Thorne Moors location of sites examined. 9 5. Thorne Moors plan of trackway (1972). 12 6. Thorne Moors trackway timbers exposed in new dyke section (1972) • 15 7. Thorne Moors the trackway and peat succession (1977).
    [Show full text]
  • Thorne Inset Campsall and Norton Inset Mexborough Inset Doncaster's
    M L B D a S o Elmsa South Elmsall n s e s W ay ll L o T w 496 to Wakefield e T 408 405 For continuation of 301 to Askern 84b to Sykehouse u e n he d n a A Kirk 2 bb L Thorne Road e w a A1 L e n A L 51 B ’s W C a D Kirkton La E 409 407.X45 M 8877 d o A alk C 87a87a Field Lane e services in this area see n E For continuation of a r 6 t g h r Thorne Inset Northgate 3 a e Bramwith a o t h 303 51a n Burghwallis R u o r 8 g a 412 ckley 84 s R h i 301 s r Lan Campsall and Norton inset right r t e h c services in this area 303 a G 84b d 8 r h R 8 Ha L l D t H R 84b ig 303 e o o S 84a a h 8a o ll R a H n n 8787 see Thorne inset right fi c a d t 8a d M 84a e 8 8a 87 87a a St. a 496 d La . a gh s 303 Owston ne 84b z t e e id d 87a87a H 8877 r Thorpe 84 l e d 84 a R l o R n o 301 e R 87a87a d . 87a87a . L a a ne Skellow r d a a in Balne e L M n 301 t L A e s La e Hazel i a Stainforth l 6 t ll .
    [Show full text]
  • Publications List
    Doncaster & District Family History Society Publications List August 2020 Parishes & Townships in the Archdeaconry of Doncaster in 1914 Notes The Anglican Diocese of Sheffield was formed in 1914 and is divided into two Archdeaconries. The map shows the Parishes within the Archdeaconry of Doncaster at that time. This publication list shows Parishes and other Collections that Doncaster & District Family History Society has transcribed and published in the form of Portable Document Files (pdf). Downloads Each Parish file etc with a reference number can be downloaded from the Internet using: www.genfair.co.uk (look for the Society under suppliers) at a cost of £6 each. Postal Sales The files can also be supplied by post on a USB memory stick. The cost is £10 each. The price includes the memory stick, one file and postage & packing. (The memory stick can be reused once you have loaded the files onto your own computer). Orders and payment by cheque through: D&DFHS Postal Sales, 18 Newbury Way, Cusworth, Doncaster, DN5 8PY Additional files at £6 each can be included on a single USB memory stick (up to a total of 4 files depending on file sizes). Example: One USB memory stick with “Adlingfleet” Parish file Ref: 1091 = £10. 1st Additional file at £6: the above plus “Adwick le Street” Ref: 1112 = Total £16. 2nd Additional file at £6: “The Poor & the Law” Ref: 1125 = Total £22 Postage included. We can also arrange payment by BACs, but for card and non-sterling purchases use Genfair While our limited stocks last we will also supply files in the form of a CD at £6 each plus postage.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Baseline Survey of Land at Finningley Quarry, South Yorkshire / Nottinghamshire LAF.FQ Lafarge Aggregates
    Lafarge Aggregates Ltd ECOLOGICAL BASELINE SURVEY OF LAND AT FINNINGLEY QUARRY, SOUTH YORKSHIRE / NOTTINGHAMSHIRE FINAL- VERSION 2 FEBRUARY 2014 ESL (Ecological Services) Ltd, 1 Otago House, Allenby Business Village, Crofton Road, Lincoln, LN3 4NL Ecological Baseline Survey of Land at Finningley Quarry, South Yorkshire / Nottinghamshire LAF.FQ Lafarge Aggregates DOCUMENT CONTROL TITLE: Ecological Baseline Survey of Land at Finningley Quarry, South Yorkshire / Nottinghamshire VERSION: Final – Version 2 DATE: February 2014 ISSUED BY: Brian Hedley AUTHORS: Peter Morrell and Brian Hedley CHECKED BY: Andrew Malkinson APPROVED BY: Vanessa Tindale ISSUED TO: David Park Restoration Manager Lafarge Aggregates Ltd Thrislington Quarry West Cornforth County Durham DL17 9EY Paul Clarke David L Walker Limited Albion House 89 Station Road Eckington Sheffield S21 4FW This report has been prepared by ESL with all reasonable skill, care and diligence, within the terms of the contract with the Client. The report is confidential to the Client. ESL accepts no responsibility of whatever nature to third parties to whom this report may be made known. No part of this document may be reproduced without the prior written approval of ESL. ESL (Ecological Services) Ltd, 1 Otago House, Allenby Business Village, Crofton Road, Lincoln, LN3 4NL Ecological Baseline Survey of Land at Finningley Quarry, South Yorkshire / Nottinghamshire LAF.FQ Lafarge Aggregates CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 DESK STUDY 1 3 HABITATS, PLANT COMMUNITIES AND PLANT SPECIES 3 3.1 Survey Methods
    [Show full text]
  • FINNINGLEY QUARRY EXTENSION, (Phases 25, 26, 27, 29 & 30) FINNINGLEY, SOUTH YORKSHIRE and MISSON, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
    FINNINGLEY QUARRY EXTENSION, (Phases 25, 26, 27, 29 & 30) FINNINGLEY, SOUTH YORKSHIRE AND MISSON, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE An Archaeological Desktop Assessment for Lafarge Aggregates Ltd Authors: L.Elliott, L.Platt & Peter Webb 2012 (Revised 2013) © Trent and Peak Archaeology Code: FME North Nottinghamshire and Finningley 1610 Trent & Peak Archaeology © Unit 1, Holly Lane Chilwell Nottingham NG9 4AB 0115 8967400 (Tel.) 0115 925 9464 (Fax.) Trent & Peak Archaeology is a trading name of York Registered Office: A Company Limited by Guarantee Archaeological Trust Registered Charity in England and 47 Aldwark, York YO1 7BX Without Share Capital Registered Wales (No. 509060) and Scotland (No. SCO42846) in England No. 1430801 Finningley Quarry Extension 2012 SUMMARY This report comprises an assessment of the archaeological potential for the proposed areas of extraction at Finningley Quarry in line with best practice recommended within the National Planning Policy Framework Section 12 (March 2012). The five proposed extensions fall within the parishes of Finningley, South Yorkshire (phases 26, 27, 30 & part of 29) and Misson, Nottinghamshire (Phase 25 & most of 29). Phase 28 to be crossed by the haulage route to the plant site (and the subject of previous evaluation), also lies in Finningley parish, South Yorkshire. One designated heritage asset listed on the South Yorkshire SMR (SMR01832) comprising three flints and one heritage asset listed on the NMR (320789) comprising thirty flints lie within phase 26 of the proposed extension. No heritage assets listed on the Nottinghamshire HER are present within the proposed extension phases. Within the wider study area of the existing quarry and adjacent areas a number of heritage assets or themes were assessed as holding significant archaeological potential, necessitating further consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 March 2005 3. Title: Response To
    ROTHERHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL – REPORT TO MEMBERS 1. Meeting: Economic and Development Cabinet Member Delegated Powers Meeting 2. Date: 7 March 2005 3. Title: Response to the Coalfields Communities Campaign regarding the Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme 4. Programme Area: Economic and Development Services/Chief Executive’s Office 5. Summary A request has been received from the Coalfield Communities Campaign asking for Rotherham’s views on the Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme (FARRRS) in Doncaster. The report sets out the background and concludes that only qualified support can be given at this time. 6. Recommendations That: (a) the Council offer its qualified support to FARRRS for the reasons given in the report, and (b) a copy of this report is forwarded to Councillor S. Wright as Rotherham’s representative on the CCC. 7. Proposals and Details At the Coalfields Communities Campaign (CCC) meeting on the 21 January 2005, Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council (DMBC) asked for the support of CCC for DMBC’s efforts to secure funding and planning approval for the Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Routes Schemes (FARRRS). Members asked for more information before taking a view and a briefing note was subsequently issued by DMBC (attached at Appendix A). The FARRRS project will provide a link road from junction 3 of the M18 motorway into Rossington and on to the Robin Hood Doncaster Sheffield Airport. It aims to facilitate the regeneration of the south east area of Doncaster and in due course enable the airport to expand. The briefing note supplied by Doncaster lists the benefits of the road scheme to the coalfield communities as follows: • Improves and enhances the growth of the airport and its role as a transformation project which assists the economic restructuring of the sub- region including numerous coalfield communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Doncaster Local Plan: Archaeological Scoping Assessment
    Doncaster Local Plan: Archaeological Scoping Assessment Allocation Reference: 501 Area (Ha): 0.53 Allocation Type: Housing NGR (centre): SE 6936 1566 Site Name: Adjacent 46 Marshlands Rd, Thorne Moorends Settlement: Thorne Moorends Allocation Recommendations Archaeological significance of site Unknown Historic landscape significance Negligible Suitability of site for allocation Uncertain archaeological constraint Summary Within site Within buffer zone Scheduled Monument - - Listed Building - - SMR record/event - 1 record Cropmark/Lidar evidence No Yes Cartographic features of interest No No Estimated sub-surface disturbance Low n/a www.archeritage.co.uk Page 1 of 3 Doncaster Local Plan: Archaeological Scoping Assessment Allocation Reference: 501 Area (Ha): 0.53 Allocation Type: Housing NGR (centre): SE 6936 1566 Site Name: Adjacent 46 Marshlands Rd, Thorne Moorends Settlement: Thorne Moorends Site assessment Known assets/character: The SMR does not record any features within the site. One findspot is recorded within the buffer zone, a Bronze Age flint arrowhead. No listed buildings or Scheduled Monuments are recorded within the site or buffer zone. The Magnesian Limestone in South and West Yorkshire Aerial Photographic Mapping Project records levelled ridge and furrow remains within the buffer zone. The Historic Environment Characterisation records the present character of the site as modern commercial core- suburban, probably associated with the construction of Moorends mining village in the first half of the 20th century. There is no legibility of the former parliamentary enclosure in this area. In the western part of the buffer, the landscape character comprises land enclosed from commons and drained in 1825, with changes to the layout between 1851 and 1891 in association with the construction of a new warping system.
    [Show full text]
  • Blaxton-Pc 10 10 2019 Redacted
    The following message has been applied automatically, to promote news and information from Nottinghamshire County Council about events and services: Got a question about recycling in Nottinghamshire? Check out our Check out our frequently asked questions. #RecycleForNotts Emails and any attachments from Nottinghamshire County Council are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the email, and then delete it without making copies or using it in any other way. Senders and recipients of email should be aware that, under the Data Protection Act 2018 and the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the contents may have to be disclosed in response to a request. Although any attachments to the message will have been checked for viruses before transmission, you are urged to carry out your own virus check before opening attachments, since the County Council accepts no responsibility for loss or damage caused by software viruses. You can view our privacy notice at: https://www.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/global-content/privacy Nottinghamshire County Council Legal Disclaimer. 2 PARISH COUNCILS OF AUCKLEY, BLAXTON, BRANTON-WITH-CANTLEY AND FINNINGLEY (ALL PART OF DMBC FINNINGLEY WARD). JOINT COMMENTS IN RESPONSE TO CONSULATION ON THE NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL DRAFT MINERALS PLAN. Summary In isolation the proposals to develop sites at Austerfield, Misson, Barnby Moor and Scrooby seem innocuous, however when considered alongside existing and proposed developments in both Nottinghamshire and the DMBC area, we have serious concerns about the impact on our communities, particularly the potential increase in Heavy Goods and other vehicles on an already busy road network in and around our villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme (FARRRS) Phase Two
    Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme (FARRRS) Phase Two Environmental Statement Volume II: Historic Environment Technical Appendix F Document Reference: MM - 337339 - ENV - 023 May 2016 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme (FARRRS) Phase Two 337339 EMP 1 A http://pims01/pims/llisapi.dll?func=ll&objId=1564796763&objAction=brow se&viewType=1 February 2016 Environmental Statement Volume II: Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route (FARRRS) Phase EnvironmentalHistoric Environment Statement Volume Technical II - Historic Appendix Environment F Technical Ap Document Reference: MM - 337339 - ENV - 023 May 2016 Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Civic Office Waterdale, Doncaster, South Yorkshire DN1 3BU Mott MacDonald, Mott MacDonald House, 111 St Mary's Road, Sheffield S2 4AP, United Kingdom T +44 (0)114 2761242 W www.mottmac.com Finningley and Rossington Regeneration Route Scheme (FARRRS) Phase Two Volume II - Historic Environment Technical Appendix F Issue and Revision Record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description J. Williams A April 2016 P. Adams M. Staniland First draft for Client comment G. Middleton J. Williams B May 2016 P. Adams M. Staniland Final for issue G. Middleton Information class: StandardStandard This document is issued for the party which commissioned it We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned document being relied upon by any other party, or being used project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission used for any other purpose. which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Peafowl Survey Report
    Indian Peafowl Survey Report For: Finningley Parish Council Site Finningley Village, Doncaster, South Yorkshire Report Date: September 2019 Report PEA.11.7.2019 Reference: Surveying Ecologist: Natasha Estrada, BSc (Hons), MRes, MCIEEM Peafowl Survey Report September 2019 Finningley Village Finningley Doncaster South Yorkshire Client: Finningley Parish Council Site Name: Finningley Village Grid Reference: SK 67187 99200 Report: Peafowl Survey Report Date of survey: August/September 2019 Surveyed by: Natasha Estrada, BSc (Hons), MRes, MCIEEM Issue: Revision: Stage: Date: Prepared by: Approved by: Jane Gruber, Natasha Estrada Draft for 15 September 1 - Estrada Ecology MCIEEM, Estrada review 2019 Ltd Ecology Ltd Jane Gruber, Natasha Estrada 16 September 2 n/a FINAL Estrada Ecology MCIEEM, Estrada 2019 Ltd Ecology Ltd Page 2 of 26 Peafowl Survey Report September 2019 Finningley Village Finningley Doncaster South Yorkshire This report has been prepared for exclusive use of the client, Finningley Parish Council. No part of this report may be reproduced or relied upon without written agreement from Estrada Ecology Ltd. The contents of this report have been produced with due consideration of current best practice guidance, and in accordance with the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management’s (CIEEM) Code of Professional Conduct. Data within this report is valid for a maximum of eighteen months from the date of the survey. After this period an updated site visit will be required to determine a new ecological baseline. Acknowledgments and thanks are given to the residents of Finningley for providing information and access to their gardens to aid the survey. Summary The survey site, comprising the residential areas of Finningley, Doncaster is dominated by buildings used as domestic dwellings and their gardens for personal enjoyment.
    [Show full text]
  • Redh DONCASTER INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY
    Redh DONCASTER INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY MEETING OUR LONG TERM INVESTMENT NEEDS ANNEX MARCH 2019 1 INTRODUCTION This report is the annex to the Doncaster Infrastructure Strategy main report. It amends the 2015 report with updated baseline data and scheme information. All data is a correct as at spring 2019. The Doncaster Infrastructure Strategy consists of the following sections. A main report setting out the key infrastructure needs facing the borough and how they will be addressed. An annex containing a more detailed description of the key infrastructure proposals and projects. A short summary of main findings and recommendations of the report. The main report includes a schedule of the key infrastructure projects that are required or are desirable to support Doncaster’s growth. This annex covers the following themes. 1. Transportation (strategic highways, rail transport, cycling and bus transport). 2. Education and learning (primary, secondary and further education). 3. Green infrastructure (greenspaces, green routes and biodiversity). 4. Health and social care. 5. Flooding and drainage infrastructure. 6. Community, sport and cultural facilities. 7. Energy and telecommunications. 8. Utilities (gas, electricity and waste water). This annex also highlights gaps in provision (in the absence of funding or committed projects) and looks at how these can be addressed. Copies of these documents are available from our website at www.doncaster.gov.uk/localplan. The information is accurate as of Spring 2019. The Doncaster Infrastructure Strategy will be updated as new information becomes available and infrastructure proposals are confirmed in more detail. 2 CHAPTER 1: TRANSPORTATION 1.1. Strategic transport infrastructure plays a key role in supporting the economic growth of the Borough and the wider Sheffield City Region.
    [Show full text]