DOCSLIB.ORG

Chunking by Social Relationship in Working Memory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chunking by Social Relationship in Working Memory SOCIAL CHUNKING IN WORKING MEMORY 1 1 2 3 4 5 Chunking by Social Relationship in Working Memory 6 7 Ilenia Paparella and Liuba Papeo 8 Institut des Sciences Cognitives— Marc Jeannerod, UMR5229, Centre National de la 9 Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) & Université Claude Bernard Lyon1, France 10 11 12 13 14 Author Note 15 Ilenia Paparella https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7683-2503 16 Liuba Papeo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3056-8679 17 The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. 18 19 Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Ilenia Paparella, now at 20 GIGA-Research, Cyclotron Research Center-In Vivo Imaging Unit, 8 allée du Six Août, 21 Batiment B30, University of Liège, 4000 Liège (Belgium). 22 Email: [email protected] 23 SOCIAL CHUNKING IN WORKING MEMORY 2 24 Abstract 25 Working memory (WM) uses knowledge and relations to organize and store multiple 26 individual items in a smaller set of structured units, or chunks. We investigated whether a 27 crowd of individuals that exceeds the WM is retained and, therefore, recognized more 28 accurately, if individuals are represented as interacting with one another –i.e., they form 29 social chunks. Further, we asked what counts as a social chunk in WM: two individuals 30 involved in a meaningful interaction or just spatially close and face-to-face. In three 31 experiments with a delayed change-detection task, participants had to report whether a 32 probe-array was the same of, or different from a sample-array featuring two or three dyads 33 of bodies either face-to-face (facing array) or back-to-back (non-facing array). In Experiment 34 1, where facing dyads depicted coherent, meaningful interactions, participants were more 35 accurate to detect changes in facing (vs. non-facing) arrays. A similar advantage was found 36 in Experiment 2, even though facing dyads depicted no meaningful interaction. In 37 Experiment 3, we introduced a secondary task (verbal shadowing) to increase WM load. 38 This manipulation abolished the advantage of facing (vs. non-facing) arrays, only when 39 facing dyads depicted no meaningful interactions. These results show that WM uses 40 representation of interaction to chunk crowds in social groups. The mere facingness of 41 bodies is sufficient on its own to evoke representation of interaction, thus defining a social 42 chunk in WM; although the lack of semantic anchor makes chunking fainter and more 43 susceptible to interference of a secondary task. 44 45 Keywords: working memory, chunking, perceptual grouping, social cognition, scene 46 perception. SOCIAL CHUNKING IN WORKING MEMORY 3 47 Living in a social world requires humans to process information about conspecifics and the 48 relationships between them. In scenarios that feature multiple faces or bodies, such as any 49 urban scene, vision exploits markers of interpersonal involvement to detect and recognize 50 social groups –i.e., people who engage in social relationship. One of such markers is the 51 relative positioning of bodies in space: nearby bodies in a face-to-face configuration are 52 more likely to be interpreted as interacting than bodies in other spatial configurations (Zhou, 53 Han, Liang, Hu, & Kuai, 2019); they are more likely to be attended to in a crowd (Papeo, 54 2020; Papeo, Goupil, & Soto-Faraco, 2019; Vestner, Gray, & Cook, 2020; Vestner, Tipper, 55 Hartley, Over, & Rueschemeyer, 2019) and to break into visual awareness under low- 56 visibility conditions (Papeo, Stein, & Soto-Faraco, 2017). Visual efficiency has been 57 accounted for by grouping, that is, the processing of multiple bodies as a single 58 perceptual/attentional unit, promoted by visuo-spatial cues of interaction such as spatial 59 proximity and facingness. 60 Here, we asked whether the advantage of grouping people by virtue of socially 61 relevant relations drags up to systems outside and beyond visual perception. A system that 62 might benefit from the representation of relationship between social agents is working 63 memory (WM). WM is the system that supports the temporary storage of a limited amount of 64 information for further cognitive operations (Ardila, 2003; Baddeley, 2000, 2003; Baddeley & 65 Logie, 1999). The limits of WM capacity can be exceeded through chunking, the process of 66 binding and storing multiple items into a single unit (Cowan, 2000; Mathy & Feldman, 2012; 67 Miller, 1956). Chunking in WM exploits a variety of cues, from perceptual similarity and low- 68 level perceptual features to semantic relatedness, and statistical regularities (Brady, Konkle, 69 & Alvarez, 2009; Brady & Tenenbaum, 2013; Hollingworth, 2007; Kaiser, Stein, & Peelen, 70 2014; Luck & Vogel, 1997; O’Donnell, Clement, & Brockmole, 2018). 71 Recent findings suggest that social relationship may be an effective principle of 72 chunking in WM. For example, it has been reported that body movements performed as part 73 of a meaningful interaction were more likely to be recognized in a short-delayed recognition 74 task, relative to movements performed by isolated agents (Ding, Gao, & Shen, 2017). In the SOCIAL CHUNKING IN WORKING MEMORY 4 75 authors’ interpretation, movements that gave rise to interaction were chunked and stored as 76 a single unit, thus increasing WM efficiency. In another study, infants as young as 16 months 77 showed to rely on knowledge about social relations to chunk sets of dolls in social units 78 (Stahl & Feigenson, 2014). In particular, after seeing dolls interacting in pairs, infants were 79 capable to remember two pairs, i.e. four dolls, which exceeded the three-item limit of their 80 WM. 81 The above effects have been interpreted as the result of embedding individuals into 82 the representation of a meaningful social interaction. But, can facingness alone, in the 83 absence of a semantically specified interaction, trigger chunking of bodies in WM? In visual 84 perception and attention, effects of grouping have been found for bodies postures oriented 85 toward one another without giving rise to any meaningful, coherent interaction (Papeo et al., 86 2017; 2019; Vestner et al., 2019). This circumstance raises the possibility that facingness – 87 i.e., the mutual perceptual accessibility of two bodies– is sufficient on its own to trigger the 88 representation of interaction that binds two bodies together. In other words, it is possible that 89 individuals represent face-to-face bodies as intrinsically meaningful, which would yield a WM 90 advantage, irrespective of whether the two facing bodies actually realize a semantically 91 specified interaction. 92 We addressed this in three experiments on female and male human adults, using a 93 delayed change-detection task. Participants saw static arrays of four or six bodies, which 94 approached or exceeded the WM capacity, arranged in two or three face-to-face (facing 95 arrays) or back-to-back dyads (non-facing array). Facing pairs could give rise to a coherent, 96 semantically explicit, interaction (meaningful set –MF), or not (meaningless set –ML). We 97 measured whether facing arrays were remembered better than non-facing arrays and, if so, 98 whether such advantage applied to MF as well as ML facing arrays (Experiments 1-2). 99 Finally, in Experiment 3, we asked participants to perform the same task with a concurrent 100 shadowing task (i.e., continuous word repetition). With this manipulation, we investigated the 101 effect of WM load on the performance with MF vs. ML arrays. Precisely, we tested whether 102 semantic specification provided an anchor point that made the representation of MF (vs. ML) SOCIAL CHUNKING IN WORKING MEMORY 5 103 interactions stronger and less subjected to interference in WM. Moreover, visual items can 104 be stored in WM in the form of corresponding verbal labels, when available, a strategy that is 105 especially common when items are assigned to a meaning (Donkin, Nosofsky, Gold, & 106 Shiffrin, 2015). Since verbal shadowing especially interferes with verbal retrieval and 107 rehearsal, Experiment 3 could offer insight on the format of representation of dyads in WM 108 (e.g., verbal or visuo-spatial). 109 In summary, with this study, we sought to isolate the effect of body positioning (facing 110 vs. non-facing) from the effect of representing a familiar, semantically specified interaction, in 111 promoting chunking by social relationship in WM. Given that, here, performance depended 112 on the possibility to structure a crowd in social (multiple-person) units, the results of this 113 study shed light on what counts as a social unit in WM. 114 115 Experiment 1 116 Experiment 1 tested the participants’ performance in detecting a change in a crowded array, 117 with bodies forming facing or non-facing dyads. All facing dyads depicted coherent, 118 meaningful interactions. 119 Participants 120 Twenty healthy adults (18 females; mean age 22.8 ± 3.9 standard deviation, SD) 121 participated in Experiment 1 as paid volunteers. All had normal or corrected-to-normal vision, 122 reported no history of neurological or psychiatric conditions and no assumption of 123 psychoactive substances or medications. Participants gave informed consent prior to 124 participation in the study. Experiments 1 was exploratory with respect to the sample size. 125 Sensitivity analysis (GPower 3.1) estimated a minimum detectable effect (i.e., the smallest 2 126 true effect, which would be statistically significant with alpha = 0.05, and power = 0.80) of ηp 127 0.10 for the effect of positioning (facing vs. non-facing arrays) with a sample size of 20. 128 Results of Experiment 1 were used to calculate the sample size for the following 129 experiments. The local ethics committee approved this and the following experiments. 130 SOCIAL CHUNKING IN WORKING MEMORY 6 131 Stimuli 132 Meaningful-interaction (MF) dyads. We created gray-scale images of a human body in 48 133 different poses in lateral view, using Daz3D (Daz Productions, Salt Lake City, UT) and the 134 Image Processing Toolbox in MATLAB (The MathWorks, Natick, MA).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 16 Improving Your Memory + 2 Tips for Selecting Passwords
    + Chapter 16 Improving Your Memory + 2 Tips for Selecting Passwords Use a transformation of some memorable cue involving a mix of letters and symbols Keep a record of all passwords in a place to which only you have access (e.g. a safe deposit box) It is easier to recall the location of a hidden object when the location is likely than when it is unexpected + 3 Popular Mnemonic Aids Harris (1980) surveyed housewives and students on their mnemonic use: Both groups used largely similar techniques; however, Students were more likely to write on their hands Housewives were more likely to write on calendars External aids (e.g. diaries, calendars, lists, and timers) were especially popular …Today we have laptops, PDAs, and mobile telephones Very few internal mnemonics were reported These are especially useful in situations that ban external aids + 4 Memory Experts Shereshevskii The Mind of a Mnemonist by Luria A Russian with an amazing memory A former journalist who never took notes but could repeat back quotes verbatim Had seemingly limitless memory for: Digits (100+) Nonsense syllables Foreign-language poetry Complex figures Complex scientific formulae His memory relied heavily on imagery and synesthesia: The tendency for one sense modality to evoke another His apparent inability to forget, and his synesthesia, caused great complications and struggle for him + Wilding and Valentine (1994) 5 Naturals vs. Strategists Naturals Strategists Innately gifted Highly practiced in certain mnemonic techniques Possess a close relative who exhibits a comparable level of memory ability Tested both kinds of mnemonists at the World Memory Championships on two types of tasks: Strategic Tasks e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Chunking As a Rational Strategy for Lossy Data Compression in Visual Working Memory
    Psychological Review © 2018 American Psychological Association 2018, Vol. 125, No. 4, 486–511 0033-295X/18/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rev0000101 Chunking as a Rational Strategy for Lossy Data Compression in Visual Working Memory Matthew R. Nassar, Julie C. Helmers, and Michael J. Frank Brown University The nature of capacity limits for visual working memory has been the subject of an intense debate that has relied on models that assume items are encoded independently. Here we propose that instead, similar features are jointly encoded through a “chunking” process to optimize performance on visual working memory tasks. We show that such chunking can: (a) facilitate performance improvements for abstract capacity-limited systems, (b) be optimized through reinforcement, (c) be implemented by center-surround dynamics, and (d) increase effective storage capacity at the expense of recall precision. Human performance on a variant of a canonical working memory task demonstrated performance advantages, precision detriments, interitem dependencies, and trial-to-trial behavioral adjustments diagnostic of performance optimization through center- surround chunking. Models incorporating center-surround chunking provided a better quantitative description of human performance in our study as well as in a meta-analytic dataset, and apparent differences in working memory capacity across individuals were attributable to individual differences in the implementation of chunking. Our results reveal a normative rationale for center-surround connectivity in working memory circuitry, call for reevaluation of memory performance differences that have previously been attributed to differences in capacity, and support a more nuanced view of visual working memory capacity limitations: strategic tradeoff between storage capacity and memory precision through chunking contribute to flexible capacity limitations that include both discrete and continuous aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Memory Training: Assessing the Efficiency of Mnemonic Strategies
    entropy Article Working Memory Training: Assessing the Efficiency of Mnemonic Strategies 1, 2 1 1, Serena Di Santo y, Vanni De Luca , Alessio Isaja and Sara Andreetta * 1 Cognitive Neuroscience, Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati, I-34136 Trieste, Italy; [email protected] (S.D.S.); [email protected] (A.I.) 2 Scuola Peripatetica d’Arte Mnemonica (S.P.A.M.), 10125 Turin, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Current address: Center for Theoretical Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA. y Received: 6 April 2020; Accepted: 18 May 2020; Published: 20 May 2020 Abstract: Recently, there has been increasing interest in techniques for enhancing working memory (WM), casting a new light on the classical picture of a rigid system. One reason is that WM performance has been associated with intelligence and reasoning, while its impairment showed correlations with cognitive deficits, hence the possibility of training it is highly appealing. However, results on WM changes following training are controversial, leaving it unclear whether it can really be potentiated. This study aims at assessing changes in WM performance by comparing it with and without training by a professional mnemonist. Two groups, experimental and control, participated in the study, organized in two phases. In the morning, both groups were familiarized with stimuli through an N-back task, and then attended a 2-hour lecture. For the experimental group, the lecture, given by the mnemonist, introduced memory encoding techniques; for the control group, it was a standard academic lecture about memory systems. In the afternoon, both groups were administered five tests, in which they had to remember the position of 16 items, when asked in random order.
    [Show full text]
  • Chunking in Working Memory and Its Relationship to Intelligence
    Chunking in Working Memory and its Relationship to Intelligence Mustapha Chekaf ([email protected]) Département de Psychologie EA 3188, Université de Franche-Comté, 30, rue Mégevand 25030 Besançon Cedex, France Nicolas Gauvrit ([email protected]) CHArt Lab (PARIS-reasoning), École Pratique des hautes Études, 4-14 rue Ferrus 75014 Paris, France Alessandro Guida ([email protected]) CRPCC, EA 1285, Université Rennes 2, Place du Recteur Henri Le Moal 35043 Rennes Cedex, France Fabien Mathy ([email protected]) BCL, CNRS, UMR 7320, Université Nice Sophia Antipolis, 24, avenue des diables bleus 06357 Nice Cedex 4, France Abstract of complexity that allows one to capture the sum of information that can be grouped to form chunks. In this Short-term memory and working memory are two distinct concepts that have been measured in simple and complex paper, we examine how this new span measure relates to span tasks respectively. A new span task was designed to intelligence and other span tasks measures. manipulate a chunking factor while using a procedure similar to simple span tasks. This span task allowed studying the Span Tasks Taxonomy interaction between storage and processing in working memory, when processing is fully dedicated to optimizing Simple span tasks traditionally require retaining a series storage. The main hypothesis was that the storage × of items (digits, words, pictures), whereas in complex span processing interaction that can be induced by the chunking tasks, participants have to maintain the to-be-recalled factor is an excellent indicator of intelligence because both material while continuously performing concurrent tasks. working memory and intelligence depend on optimizing Therefore, it has been assumed that short-term memory and storage.
    [Show full text]
  • Chunking and Questioning Aloud Strategy Summary Sheet
    Chunking and Questioning Aloud Strategy Summary Sheet Chunking is the grouping of words in a sentence into short meaningful phrases (usually three to five words). This process prevents word-by-word reading, which can cause lack of comprehension, since students forget the beginning of a sentence before they get to the end (Casteel, 1988). Smith (1982) assessed chunking as the largest meaningful combination of units that can be placed in short-term memory. Studies indicate that the presentation of “chunked” material separated into meaningful related groups of words improves the comprehension of some readers, most noticeably those readers who are classified as poor or low-ability readers (Casteel, 1989). - Chunking is a procedure of breaking up reading material into manageable sections. Before reading a “chunk” students are given a statement of purpose, which guides them to look for something specific in the text. This process is repeated until students complete the passage. - For checking comprehension: once students have read a passage they are asked to close their books and pretend they are teachers. They are to ask questions relating to what they have read. After a while, the teacher reverses the roles having students answer comprehension questions (Bondaza, 1998). - Excessive chunking (chunk’s chunks) may hinder text comprehension. A misapplied segmentation strategy causes slower reading (Keenan, 1984). - Extreme variability in line length may slow reading by disrupting the rhythm of eye movements (Keenan, 1984). - A related technique – Read Cover Recite Check (RCRC). The advantages of reading aloud to students: reluctant readers might be “turned on” to reading, students may be exposed to literature beyond their reading ability, aural exposure to more complex patterns prepares listeners to predict these structures in future experiences, listening comprehension is developed, and vocabulary is increased (Shoop, 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Learning and Memory Strategy Demonstrations for the Psychology
    LEARNING & MEMORY 1 Learning and Memory Strategy Demonstrations for the Psychology Classroom Jennifer A. McCabe Goucher College 2013 Instructional Resource Award recipient Author contact information: Jennifer A. McCabe Department of Psychology Goucher College 1021 Dulaney Valley Road Baltimore, MD 21204 E-mail: [email protected] Phone: 410-337-6558 Copyright 2014 by Jennifer A. McCabe. All rights reserved. You may reproduce multiple copies of this material for your own personal use, including use in your classes and/or sharing with individual colleagues as long as the author’s name and institution and the Office of Teaching Resources in Psychology heading or other identifying information appear on the copied document. No other permission is implied or granted to print, copy, reproduce, or distribute additional copies of this material. Anyone who wishes to produce copies for purposes other than those specified above must obtain the permission of the author. LEARNING & MEMORY 2 Overview This 38-page document contains an introduction to the resource, background information on learning and memory strategies, a summary of research on undergraduate student metacognition with regard to these strategies, and a collection of classroom demonstrations that allows students to experience real-time the effectiveness of specific learning and memory strategies. References are included at the end of the document. Table of Contents Page I. Introduction 3 II. Background Information on Strategies and Metacognition 4 III. Classroom Demonstrations of Learning and Memory Strategies 5 A. Deep Processing 6 B. Self-Reference Effect 10 C. Spacing Effect 12 D. Testing Effect 16 E. Imagery 17 F. Chunking 22 G.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Sight-Reading Pedagogy for the Brass Studio: the Use of Supplemental Material to Improve Sight-Reading Ability
    Developing a Sight-Reading Pedagogy for the Brass Studio: The Use of Supplemental Material to Improve Sight-Reading Ability by Guytano Martorano III, MM BME A Dissertation In Music Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF MUSICAL ARTS Approved Kevin Wass Chair of Committee Carla Davis Cash James T. Decker Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School May 2019 Copyright 2019, Guytano Martorano III Texas Tech University, Guytano Martorano III, May 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………...….. iv I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE OF RESEARCH ................................................................................................................................4 II. LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................... 5 RESEARCH ON SIGHT-READING ....................................................................................................................6 Factors Correlating to Sight-Reading Ability .........................................................................................8 Characteristics of Sight-Reading Education .........................................................................................15 Developing Technologies in Sight-Reading .........................................................................................21 Perceptual, Psychological,
    [Show full text]
  • Chunking As a Rational Strategy for Lossy Data Compression in Visual Working Memory Tasks
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/098939; this version posted January 6, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Chunking as a rational strategy for lossy data compression in visual working memory tasks. Matthew R. Nassar1, Julie Helmers1, and Michael J. Frank1 1Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences; Brown Institute for Brain Science, Brown University 02912-1821 Corresponding Author: Matthew R. Nassar Department of Cognitive, Linguistic and Psychological Sciences Brown University Providence, RI 02912-1821 Phone: 607-316-4932 E-mail: [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/098939; this version posted January 6, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract: The amount of visual information that can be stored in working memory is inherently limited, and the nature of this limitation has been a subject of intense debate. The debate has relied on tasks and models that assume visual items are independently encoded in working memory. Here we propose an alternative to this assumption: similar features are jointly encoded through a “chunking” process to optimize performance on visual working memory tasks. We show that such chunking can: 1) facilitate performance improvements for abstract capacity- limited systems, 2) be optimized through reinforcement, 3) be implemented by neural network center-surround dynamics, and 4) increase effective storage capacity at the expense of recall precision.
    [Show full text]
  • Infants Hierarchically Organize Memory Representations Rebecca D
    Developmental Science 16:4 (2013), pp 610–621 DOI: 10.1111/desc.12055 PAPER Infants hierarchically organize memory representations Rebecca D. Rosenberg1,2 and Lisa Feigenson1 1. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, USA 2. Department of Psychology, Denison University, USA Abstract Throughout development, working memory is subject to capacity limits that severely constrain short-term storage. However, adults can massively expand the total amount of remembered information by grouping items into chunks. Although infants also have been shown to chunk objects in memory, little is known regarding the limits of this ability. In particular, it remains unknown whether infants can create more complex memory hierarchies, binding representations of chunks into still larger chunks in recursive fashion. Here we tested the limits of early chunking, first measuring the number of items infants can bind into a single chunk and the number of chunks infants can maintain concurrently, and then, critically, whether infants can embed chunked representations into larger units. We tested 14-month-old infants’ memory for hidden objects using a manual search task in which we manipulated memory load (the number of objects infants saw hidden) and the chunking cues provided. We found that infants are limited in the number of items they can chunk and in the number of chunks they can remember. However, we also found that infants can bind representations of chunks into ‘superchunks’. These results suggest that hierarchically organizing information strongly affects working memory, starting in infancy. Introduction hierarchically structured representations. Adults do this widely when grouping items in memory (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Chunking Help Working Memory?
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2019 How does chunking help working memory? Thalmann, Mirko ; Souza, Alessandra S ; Oberauer, Klaus Abstract: Chunking is the recoding of smaller units of information into larger, familiar units. Chunking is often assumed to help bypassing the limited capacity of working memory (WM). We investigate how chunks are used in WM tasks, addressing three questions: (a) Does chunking reduce the load on WM? Across four experiments chunking benefits were found not only for recall of the chunked but also ofother not-chunked information concurrently held in WM, supporting the assumption that chunking reduces load. (b) Is the chunking benefit independent of chunk size? The chunking benefit was independent of chunk size only if the chunks were composed of unique elements, so that each chunk could be replaced by its first element (Experiment 1), but not when several chunks consisted of overlapping sets of elements, disabling this replacement strategy (Experiments 2 and 3). The chunk-size effect is not due to differences in rehearsal duration as it persisted when participants were required to perform articulatory suppression (Experiment 3). Hence, WM capacity is not limited to a fixed number of chunks regardless of their size. (c) Does the chunking benefit depend on the serial position of the chunk? Chunks in early list positions improved recall of other, not-chunked material, but chunks at the end of the list did not. We conclude that a chunk reduces the load on WM via retrieval of a compact chunk representation from long-term memory that replaces the representations of individual elements of the chunk.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is the Style for the Title
    Behavior and Philosophy, 30, 1-13 (2002). © 2002 Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies RADICAL BEHAVIORISM AND EXCEPTIONAL MEMORY PHENOMENA Rajan Mahadevan John C. Malone University of Tennessee, Knoxville Jon Bailey Florida State University, Tallahassee ABSTRACT: The central claim of this paper is that radical behaviorism and cognitive psychology can both make important contributions to an experimental analysis of a cognitive skill such as memory performance. Though they currently differ in what constitutes an explanation of many phenomena, behaviorists and cognitive psychologists share interests in such human activities as problem solving and memory. We show how the behavioral approach may apply to one case that seems to epitomize cognition—the dramatic improvement in the memory span performance of one individual on a task often used by cognitive psychologists to assess short-term memory. After 230 hours of practice, ability to recall random digits improved from a span of 7 digits to a span of 80. Although a detailed account of the mechanisms that mediated such improvement has been given, we show that the acquisition of such exceptional memory skill can also be explained within the framework of behavior analysis. Key words: exceptional memory, Radical Behaviorism, cognitive explanations, digit span. A Behavioral Analysis of Exceptional Memory Memory has generally been studied by cognitive psychologists and by scientists from some other disciplines, such as the neurosciences. The cognitive movement came about (or at least gained momentum) in the 1950s and 1960s because developments in the field of artificial intelligence, human factors, and psycholinguistics led to the widespread belief that radical behaviorism could not provide a satisfactory account of human behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Teachers' Role in the Development of Children's Metamemory and Strategy Knowledge: a Cross-Cultural Comparison of American and Singaporean Elementary School Teachers
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1995 Teachers' Role in the Development of Children's Metamemory and Strategy Knowledge: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of American and Singaporean Elementary School Teachers Sony Hoe Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Hoe, Sony, "Teachers' Role in the Development of Children's Metamemory and Strategy Knowledge: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of American and Singaporean Elementary School Teachers" (1995). Master's Theses. 4093. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/4093 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1995 Sony Hoe LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO TEACHERS' ROLE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDREN'S METAMEMORY AND STRATEGY KNOWLEDGE: A CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON OF AMERICAN AND SINGAPOREAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHERS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY BY SONY HOE CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JANUARY 1995 Copyright by Sony Hoe, 1994 All rights reserved. 11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, I would like to thank Dr. Denise Davidson, my adviser, for her patience and encouragement during the most trying moments of data collection, as well as her valuable feedback during the other phases of this project's evolution.
    [Show full text]