DOCSLIB.ORG

This Is the Style for the Title

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
This Is the Style for the Title Behavior and Philosophy, 30, 1-13 (2002). © 2002 Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies RADICAL BEHAVIORISM AND EXCEPTIONAL MEMORY PHENOMENA Rajan Mahadevan John C. Malone University of Tennessee, Knoxville Jon Bailey Florida State University, Tallahassee ABSTRACT: The central claim of this paper is that radical behaviorism and cognitive psychology can both make important contributions to an experimental analysis of a cognitive skill such as memory performance. Though they currently differ in what constitutes an explanation of many phenomena, behaviorists and cognitive psychologists share interests in such human activities as problem solving and memory. We show how the behavioral approach may apply to one case that seems to epitomize cognition—the dramatic improvement in the memory span performance of one individual on a task often used by cognitive psychologists to assess short-term memory. After 230 hours of practice, ability to recall random digits improved from a span of 7 digits to a span of 80. Although a detailed account of the mechanisms that mediated such improvement has been given, we show that the acquisition of such exceptional memory skill can also be explained within the framework of behavior analysis. Key words: exceptional memory, Radical Behaviorism, cognitive explanations, digit span. A Behavioral Analysis of Exceptional Memory Memory has generally been studied by cognitive psychologists and by scientists from some other disciplines, such as the neurosciences. The cognitive movement came about (or at least gained momentum) in the 1950s and 1960s because developments in the field of artificial intelligence, human factors, and psycholinguistics led to the widespread belief that radical behaviorism could not provide a satisfactory account of human behavior. Thus, the spatial metaphors were invented to account for human problem solving, and the structure models were invented to account for human memory phenomena. In contrast to radical behaviorists, cognitive psychologists are more concerned with ordinary-language categories, such as “memory,” “reading comprehension,” “problem solving,” and with determining the limits of human capabilities (e.g., what is the span of immediate memory?). Behavior analysts, on the other hand, are less interested in determining “limits” and more concerned with demonstrating functional relationships. Behaviorists also argue against the use of mediators, such as storage metaphors AUTHORS’ NOTE: Reprints may be obtained from any of the authors. Email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. 1 MAHADEVAN, MALONE, & BAILEY and retrieval mechanisms, mediators that are the essence of cognitive psychology. The widespread view among cognitive psychologists is that behavior analysis does not have any role, or not a significant one, to play in research on human memory. The belief that behavior analysis is excluded (or has excluded itself) from such areas was a major factor in precipitating the so-called cognitive revolution. Those seriously interested in human cognition believed that mediational constructs were indispensable to an understanding of “higher mental functions,” such as human problem solving and memory. However, some, such as Watkins (1990), argue that mediational constructs have impeded progress in memory research. He went so far as to write: Memory theorizing is going nowhere. The reason is that it is rooted in mediationism, the doctrine that memory is mediated by some sort of memory trace. (p. 328) Watkins specifically disputed the usefulness of inferred stages of “encoding,” “storage,” and “retrieval,” arguing that such a model far surpasses the conclusions that may be drawn from the data of experimental psychology. Excessive modeling has led to an overabundance of memory theories that employ terminology that is imprecise and assumptions that are difficult to disprove. Roediger (1985) agreed, claiming that there has been such a proliferation of analogical memory models that a huge array of hypothetical mental representations are tied loosely, if at all, to behavior. The proliferation of hypothetical mechanisms and mediators of memory had been noted earlier by many others, including Underwood (1972) and Tulving (1979). We argue that not only can such “mental” phenomena as memory be the subject of behavior analysis, but also that the behavioral viewpoint may be profitably adopted by cognitive psychologists. We first briefly describe the cognitive and the behavioral approaches to memory. Then we describe a case study of an individual designated as “SF,” who acquired exceptional memory through laboratory practice (Ericsson & Chase, 1982). Third, we provide a cognitive interpretation as well as a behavioral analysis of SF’s performance, and we discuss ways in which behavior analysis can improve our understanding of memory. Finally, we compare and contrast the relative fruitfulness of the radical behaviorist and the cognitive positions, in explaining memory behavior. The Cognitive Approach to Memory Although there are many models of memory, most researchers argue in favor of two distinct memory systems, a short-term memory (STM) and a long-term memory system (LTM). The capacity of STM has been considered to be limited to about seven unrelated items (Miller, 1956) or “chunks,” and to persist over about 30 seconds. After 30 seconds or so information in STM is either “lost” or forgotten unless it has been transferred to more durable storage in LTM. A person can use a number of devices to achieve storage in LTM, such as rehearsal or encoding the material in some meaningful manner, such as chunking. The capacity of LTM is 2 EXCEPTIONAL MEMORY AND RADICAL BEHAVIORISM assumed to be very large and information in LTM can last a lifetime. STM corresponds roughly with the current state of consciousness. Information that is stored in LTM cannot be retrieved directly from it—it must first be brought into STM before the “output” can be produced. There are, of course, many, many models for memory1 and this sketch is an approximation only. Consider it a generic version. Anyone attempting even a brief summary of cognitive approaches to memory must pause and consider the opinion of Endel Tulving (1979, p. 27): After a hundred years of laboratory-based study of memory, we still do not seem to possess any concepts that the majority of workers would consider important or necessary. If one asked a dozen or so randomly selected active memory researchers to compile a list of concepts without which they could not function, one would find little agreement among them . if one compares different textbooks of memory, one discovers that there is little overlap among their subject indexes. It seems that important concepts of one author can apparently be dispensed with by another. Radical behaviorists might argue that matters have not improved since 1979 and many cognitivists might agree! The Behavioral Position on Memory For behaviorists, or radical behaviorists at least, the construct of memory is not required in order to understanding remembering. This position was long expressed by Skinner, for example in Contingencies of Reinforcement (1969), About Behaviorism (1974), and elsewhere. Specifically, Skinner (1969, p. 274) argued that the storage metaphor that cognitive psychology borrowed from computer science is inappropriate, since: . the organism does not need to make a copy of the environment in order to perceive it. When an organism that has been exposed to a set of contingencies of reinforcement is modified by them and so behaves differently, what is stored is a modified organism, not a record of the modifying variables . the conditions that determine the accessibility of stored memories really determine the accessibility of responses. Cognitive psychologists disagree, but the fact is that the metaphor of stored memories is unnecessary to explain behavior. This is not a new nor even a recent view. James Angell (1907) promoted it a century ago, as did many others during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Baum (1994) follows Skinner as a modern opponent of memory-as-storage and notes that we never say that we “remember” that we stubbed our toe 30 seconds ago. If we don’t need to store-and-retrieve over a 30-second span, we need not do so over a 30-hour or 30-year span. Skinner 1 The controversy about whether one needs to conceptualize memory in terms of one memory system or two (STM and LTM) is irrelevant to the present paper. 3 MAHADEVAN, MALONE, & BAILEY (1974, 1985) proposed that a storage battery was a better model of a behaving organism than is storage in a computer (or other) memory. We store electricity in a battery by changing its chemical composition and we remove electricity when we need it. But there is no electricity in the battery. By the same token, organisms do not acquire various kinds of behavior as possessions; they simply come to act differently in different situations because of past experience. Many current cognitive psychologists would agree with Skinner— the storage metaphor has not proven useful in understanding memory and information is not passively stored (e.g., Ericsson, 1985; Ericsson, Weaver, Delaney, & Mahadevan, 1996). But many believe that the construct of memory is necessary, despite behaviorist objections. One reason that cognitive psychologists see memory as necessary is to preserve the notion of a problem space to deal with cognitive activity such as problem solving, and the spatial metaphor has occupied a pivotal role in many cognitive theories. However, as Rubin (1988) has pointed out, the spatial metaphor predates the cognitive revolution because “Our spatial abilities are so strong and so pervasive that they do not allow for the development of complex process models” (p. 380). This “problem space” provides the static snapshot that seems so necessary to lay readers and to many psychologists. But it lacks a satisfactory description of what actually goes on when the movie begins. A Case Study of Exceptional Memory We turn now to the case study of subject SF. We describe his memory skill acquisition from the cognitive as well as from the behavioral perspectives.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Memory and Narrative: Reading the Things They Carried for Psyche and Persona Frank Hassebrock and Brenda Boyle, Denison University
    Memory and Narrative: Reading The Things They Carried for Psyche and Persona Frank Hassebrock and Brenda Boyle, Denison University Abstract: This essay looks closely at how two disciplines, Psychology and English, can use the same text for similar purposes. A Psychology professor discusses how Tim O'Brien's The Things They Carried can exemplify for his students how memory is used to construct a self, a psyche. A teacher of literature then examines how the same text demonstrates for students the rhetorical construction of a fictional self, a persona, and also how that construction is influenced by the various historical periods represented in the novel's stories. Through the investigation of these two disciplinary approaches, students in our classes gain an appreciation for the psychological functions of remembering and the rhetorical functions of reading. People select and interpret certain memories as self-defining, providing them with privileged status in the life story… . To a certain degree, then, identity is a product of choice. We choose the events we consider most important for defining who we are and providing our lives with some semblance of unity and purpose. And we endow them with symbolism, lessons learned, integrative themes, and other personal meaning that make sense to us in the present as we survey the past and anticipate the future. (McAdams, 2004, p. 104) A rhetoric incorporates more than practical strategies for speaking and writing. Rhetoric reflects the values and perspectives of a culture. It is a distillation of what a given society counts as knowledge and evidence, how it defines social connections and responsibilities, the context in which communicative acts will be interpreted.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 16 Improving Your Memory + 2 Tips for Selecting Passwords
    + Chapter 16 Improving Your Memory + 2 Tips for Selecting Passwords Use a transformation of some memorable cue involving a mix of letters and symbols Keep a record of all passwords in a place to which only you have access (e.g. a safe deposit box) It is easier to recall the location of a hidden object when the location is likely than when it is unexpected + 3 Popular Mnemonic Aids Harris (1980) surveyed housewives and students on their mnemonic use: Both groups used largely similar techniques; however, Students were more likely to write on their hands Housewives were more likely to write on calendars External aids (e.g. diaries, calendars, lists, and timers) were especially popular …Today we have laptops, PDAs, and mobile telephones Very few internal mnemonics were reported These are especially useful in situations that ban external aids + 4 Memory Experts Shereshevskii The Mind of a Mnemonist by Luria A Russian with an amazing memory A former journalist who never took notes but could repeat back quotes verbatim Had seemingly limitless memory for: Digits (100+) Nonsense syllables Foreign-language poetry Complex figures Complex scientific formulae His memory relied heavily on imagery and synesthesia: The tendency for one sense modality to evoke another His apparent inability to forget, and his synesthesia, caused great complications and struggle for him + Wilding and Valentine (1994) 5 Naturals vs. Strategists Naturals Strategists Innately gifted Highly practiced in certain mnemonic techniques Possess a close relative who exhibits a comparable level of memory ability Tested both kinds of mnemonists at the World Memory Championships on two types of tasks: Strategic Tasks e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • ELA/Literacy Released Item 2018 Grade 11 Research Simulation
    ELA/Literacy Released Item 2018 Grade 11 Research Simulation Task Factors Interfering With Memory Accuracy II428729783 © 2019 CCSSO, LLC English Language Arts/Literacy Today you will research scientific discoveries about how memory works. You will read the article “New Discoveries on Optimizing Memory Formation.” Then you will read the passage from “Tricks of Memory” and the article “Exceptional Memory Explained: How Some People Remember What They Had for Lunch 20 Years Ago.” As you review these sources, you will gather and synthesize information and answer questions about scientific concepts so you can write an analytical essay. Read the article “New Discoveries on Optimizing Memory Formation.” Then answer the questions. New Discoveries on Optimizing Memory Formation by William R. Klemm 1 As each of us goes through life, we remember a little and forget a lot. The stockpile of what we remember contributes greatly to define us and our place in the world. Thus, it is important to remember and optimize the processes that make that possible. 2 People who compete in memory contests (“memory athletes”) have long known the value of associational cues (see my Memory Power 101 book). Neuroscientists have known for a long time about memory consolidation (converting short-term memory to long-term form) and the value of associational cues. But now, important new understanding is arising from a research lab at Northwestern that links cueing to “re-consolidation” and reveals new possibilities for optimizing long-term memory formation. 3 The underlying research approach is based on such well-established memory principles as: 1. When information is first acquired, it is tagged for its potential importance or value.
    [Show full text]
  • Short-Term Memory
    Factsheet 2. Making Working Memory Work for Educational Psychologists. Short-Term Memory Written by Debbora Hall and Chris Jarrold, March 2015 Theoretical background In Factsheet 1, we discussed Baddeley’s (1986) model of working memory, and how it has served as a useful framework for thinking about domain specific stores for verbal and visuo-spatial material, with general ‘executive’ resources. We added speed of processing to this model, and the ability to resist distraction. Here we will focus on the short-term memory aspect of working memory. Short-term memory is a core component of working memory (Colom et al., 2014). Short-term memory for verbal information is often measured using digit span, in which individuals are presented with increasing lists of digits, until they can no longer recall the list in correct serial order. The last point at which recall was perfect is called their span level. To measure a child’s visuo-spatial short-term memory, tasks like the Corsi span task can be used (Milner, 1971). In this procedure, children are presented with an array of randomly arranged blocks, and the psychologist points to a sequence of blocks. The child must recall the blocks in the order presented. Again, their span is the maximum number of blocks that they correctly tap in the correct sequence. Our game ‘Capacity Limits’ provides a computer analogue of the digit span task and the Corsi span task. In the verbal memory game, children can be presented with increasing lists of digits. In the visual memory game, they need to remember the sequence of lily pads a frog hopped to and from.
    [Show full text]
  • Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory: Quality and Quantity of Retention Over Time
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works Title Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory: Quality and Quantity of Retention Over Time. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8bw1f25b Authors LePort, Aurora KR Stark, Shauna M McGaugh, James L et al. Publication Date 2015 DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02017 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 21 January 2016 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02017 Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory: Quality and Quantity of Retention Over Time Aurora K. R. LePort1,2, Shauna M. Stark1,2, James L. McGaugh1,2 and Craig E. L. Stark1,2* 1 Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA, 2 Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Department of Education, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA Individuals who have Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory (HSAM) are able to recall, with considerable accuracy, details of daily experiences that occurred over many previous decades. The present study parametrically investigates the quantity and quality of details of autobiographical memories acquired 1-week, 1-month, 1-year, and 10-years prior in HSAMs and controls. In addition, we tested the consistency of details provided at the 1-week delay by testing the subjects 1 month later with a surprise assessment. At the 1-week delay, HSAMs and controls recalled an equivalent number of events. In contrast, HSAM recall performance was superior at more remote delays, with remarkable consistency following a 1-month delay. Further, we revealed a relationship between the consistency of recall and HSAMs’ obsessive– Edited by: compulsive tendencies.
    [Show full text]
  • ICOM-6 Program
    Altered video task in 15-month-olds how to bridge the gap between Tulving’s definition and current methods? Bobrowicz, Katarzyna; Haman, Maciej; Bobrowicz, Ryszard 2016 Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Bobrowicz, K., Haman, M., & Bobrowicz, R. (2016). Altered video task in 15-month-olds: how to bridge the gap between Tulving’s definition and current methods?. 158-158. Abstract from 6th International Conference on Memory (ICOM6), Budapest, Hungary. Total number of authors: 3 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 ICOM-6 Program Keynote session I K1 session Sunday, 17 July 2016 | 17:15 - 18:15 | Room 1 Chair/Organizer: Martin A.
    [Show full text]
  • Chunking As a Rational Strategy for Lossy Data Compression in Visual Working Memory
    Psychological Review © 2018 American Psychological Association 2018, Vol. 125, No. 4, 486–511 0033-295X/18/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rev0000101 Chunking as a Rational Strategy for Lossy Data Compression in Visual Working Memory Matthew R. Nassar, Julie C. Helmers, and Michael J. Frank Brown University The nature of capacity limits for visual working memory has been the subject of an intense debate that has relied on models that assume items are encoded independently. Here we propose that instead, similar features are jointly encoded through a “chunking” process to optimize performance on visual working memory tasks. We show that such chunking can: (a) facilitate performance improvements for abstract capacity-limited systems, (b) be optimized through reinforcement, (c) be implemented by center-surround dynamics, and (d) increase effective storage capacity at the expense of recall precision. Human performance on a variant of a canonical working memory task demonstrated performance advantages, precision detriments, interitem dependencies, and trial-to-trial behavioral adjustments diagnostic of performance optimization through center- surround chunking. Models incorporating center-surround chunking provided a better quantitative description of human performance in our study as well as in a meta-analytic dataset, and apparent differences in working memory capacity across individuals were attributable to individual differences in the implementation of chunking. Our results reveal a normative rationale for center-surround connectivity in working memory circuitry, call for reevaluation of memory performance differences that have previously been attributed to differences in capacity, and support a more nuanced view of visual working memory capacity limitations: strategic tradeoff between storage capacity and memory precision through chunking contribute to flexible capacity limitations that include both discrete and continuous aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Functions of the Brain: Perception, Attention and Memory
    IFM LAB TUTORIAL SERIES # 6, COPYRIGHT c IFM LAB Cognitive Functions of the Brain: Perception, Attention and Memory Jiawei Zhang [email protected] Founder and Director Information Fusion and Mining Laboratory (First Version: May 2019; Revision: May 2019.) Abstract This is a follow-up tutorial article of [17] and [16], in this paper, we will introduce several important cognitive functions of the brain. Brain cognitive functions are the mental processes that allow us to receive, select, store, transform, develop, and recover information that we've received from external stimuli. This process allows us to understand and to relate to the world more effectively. Cognitive functions are brain-based skills we need to carry out any task from the simplest to the most complex. They are related with the mechanisms of how we learn, remember, problem-solve, and pay attention, etc. To be more specific, in this paper, we will talk about the perception, attention and memory functions of the human brain. Several other brain cognitive functions, e.g., arousal, decision making, natural language, motor coordination, planning, problem solving and thinking, will be added to this paper in the later versions, respectively. Many of the materials used in this paper are from wikipedia and several other neuroscience introductory articles, which will be properly cited in this paper. This is the last of the three tutorial articles about the brain. The readers are suggested to read this paper after the previous two tutorial articles on brain structure and functions [17] as well as the brain basic neural units [16]. Keywords: The Brain; Cognitive Function; Consciousness; Attention; Learning; Memory Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Perception 3 2.1 Detailed Process of Perception .
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    --> Europe's Journal of Psychology ejop.psychopen.eu | 1841-0413 Book Reviews Schmidt, Stephen R. (2012). Extraordinary Memories for Exceptional Events: Essays in Cognitive Psychology. Psychology Press Extraordinary Memories for Exceptional Events: Essays in Cognitive Psychology Victoria Wright*a [a] Aberystwyth University, Ceredigion, UK. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 2012, Vol. 8(3), 507–510, doi:10.5964/ejop.v8i3.501 Received: 2012-07-31. Accepted: 2012-08-01. Published: 2012-08-29. *Corresponding author at: Department of Psychology, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, Wales, UK SY23 3UX, email: [email protected]. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Apollo 11 moon landings. The Challenger space shuttle disaster. The 9/11 World Trade Centre attacks. Depending on your age, there’s a good chance you have a particularly vivid and highly detailed memory of at least one of these events. At the same time, your memory for the days immediately preceding, and following, these events is probably poor. Why is it that we are able to remember momentous events better than mundane events? And just how accurate are these exceptional memories that we create? These are the central questions addressed in ‘Extraordinary Memories for Exceptional Events’, by Stephen R. Schmidt, a timely consideration of the vast body of theoretical and empirical evidence that underpins our understanding of memory for exceptional events. The purpose of Schmidt’s book is to draw together key theories and empirical evidence in order to persent a comprehensive overview of memory for extraordinary events.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Processing Models of Learning Applied to Gifted Learning John Munro
    Psychology of gifted learning Session 5 Information processing models of learning applied to gifted learning John Munro Objectives of the session. At the end of this session you should be able to • describe the information processing approach to learning , • discuss its implications for teaching and education of gifted children, • discuss the concepts of attention and memory processes in learning. • discuss the concepts of short term and long term memory and their implications for teaching. Content Models of information processing to explain learning Learners learn by processing information. Key questions include: • what types of information can individuals process ? What determines this ? • where does the processing (that is, the ideas-re organizing) take place ? • how much information can a learner process at once ? • what initiates the processing at any time ? Learners as information processors Learners' existing knowledge ('long term memory') provides the 'information processing units' and the ways of linking ideas. Learners can handle several types of information at once. Different types of existing knowledge involves units of meaning organised or linked in different ways: • conceptual • episodic • motoric • knowledge of one's self as a learner The information is processed in site for learning or thinking space; short term working memory . At any time this is limited; learners process a restricted amount of information at once. Two metaphors are used to explain thinking and learning in terms of information processing: • a structures
    [Show full text]
  • Hyper Memory, Synaesthesia, Savants Luria and Borges Revisited
    Dement Neuropsychol 2018 June;12(2):101-104 Views & Reviews http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642018dn12-020001 Hyper memory, synaesthesia, savants Luria and Borges revisited Luis Fornazzari1, Melissa Leggieri2, Tom A. Schweizer3, Raul L. Arizaga4, Ricardo F. Allegri5, Corinne E. Fischer6 ABSTRACT. In this paper, we investigated two subjects with superior memory, or hyper memory: Solomon Shereshevsky, who was followed clinically for years by A. R. Luria, and Funes the Memorious, a fictional character created by J. L. Borges. The subjects possessed hyper memory, synaesthesia and symptoms of what we now call autistic spectrum disorder (ASD). We will discuss interactions of these characteristics and their possible role in hyper memory. Our study suggests that the hyper memory in our synaesthetes may have been due to their ASD-savant syndrome characteristics. However, this talent was markedly diminished by their severe deficit in categorization, abstraction and metaphorical functions. As investigated by previous studies, we suggest that there is altered connectivity between the medial temporal lobe and its connections to the prefrontal cingulate and amygdala, either due to lack of specific neurons or to a more general neuronal dysfunction. Key words: memory, hyper memory, savantism, synaesthesia, autistic spectrum disorder, Solomon Shereshevsky, Funes the memorious. HIPERMEMÓRIA, SINESTESIA, SAVANTS: LURIA E BORGES REVISITADOS RESUMO. Neste artigo, investigamos dois sujeitos com memória superior ou hipermemória: Solomon Shereshevsky, que foi seguido clinicamente por anos por A. R. Luria, e Funes o memorioso, um personagem fictício criado por J. L. Borges. Os sujeitos possuem hipermemória, sinestesia e sintomas do que hoje chamamos de transtorno do espectro autista (TEA).
    [Show full text]
  • N-Back Versus Complex Span Working Memory Training
    JCognEnhanc https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-017-0044-1 ORIGINAL ARTICLE N-back Versus Complex Span Working Memory Training Kara J. Blacker1 & Serban Negoita1 & Joshua B. Ewen1,2,3 & Susan M. Courtney 1,4,5 Received: 19 April 2017 /Accepted: 5 October 2017 # Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Abstract Working memory (WM) is the ability to maintain but not complex span task training. Participants completed and manipulate task-relevant information in the absence of adaptive training on either a dual n-back task, a symmetry sensory input. While its improvement through training is of span task, or on a non-WM active control task. We found great interest, the degree to which WM training transfers to evidence of near transfer for the dual n-back group; however, untrained WM tasks (near transfer) and other untrained cog- far transfer to a measure of fluid intelligence did not emerge. nitive skills (far transfer) remains debated and the mecha- Recording EEG during a separate WM transfer task, we ex- nism(s) underlying transfer are unclear. Here we hypothesized amined group-specific, training-related changes in alpha pow- that a critical feature of dual n-back training is its reliance on er, which are proposed to be sensitive to WM demands and maintaining relational information in WM. In experiment 1, top-down modulation of WM. Results indicated that the dual using an individual differences approach, we found evidence n-back group showed significantly greater frontal alpha power that performance on an n-back task was predicted by perfor- after training compared to before training, more so than both mance on a measure of relational WM (i.e., WM for vertical other groups.
    [Show full text]