DOCSLIB.ORG

1. REPRESENTATIVE PROBLEMS ‣ Stable Matching ‣ Five

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1. REPRESENTATIVE PROBLEMS 1. REPRESENTATIVE PROBLEMS ‣ stable matching ‣ stable matching ‣ five representative problems ‣ five representative problems SECTION 1.1 Lecture slides by Kevin Wayne Copyright © 2005 Pearson-Addison Wesley http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~wayne/kleinberg-tardos Matching med-school students to hospitals Stable matching problem Goal. Given a set of preferences among hospitals and med-school students, Goal. Given a set of n men and a set of n women, find a "suitable" matching. design a self-reinforcing admissions process. ・Participants rank members of opposite sex. ・Each man lists women in order of preference from best to worst. Unstable pair: student x and hospital y are unstable if: ・Each woman lists men in order of preference from best to worst. ・x prefers y to its assigned hospital. ・y prefers x to one of its admitted students. Stable assignment. Assignment with no unstable pairs. ・Natural and desirable condition. favorite least favorite favorite least favorite ・Individual self-interest prevents any hospital–student side deal. 1st 2nd 3rd 1st 2nd 3rd Xavier Amy Bertha Clare Amy Yancey Xavier Zeus Yancey Bertha Amy Clare Bertha Xavier Yancey Zeus Zeus Amy Bertha Clare Clare Xavier Yancey Zeus men's preference list women's preference list 3 4 Perfect matching Unstable pair Def. A matching S is a set of ordered pairs m–w with m ∈ M and w ∈ W s.t. Def. Given a perfect matching S, man m and woman w are unstable if: ・Each man m ∈ M appears in at most one pair of S. ・m prefers w to his current partner. ・Each woman w ∈ W appears in at most one pair of S. ・w prefers m to her current partner. Def. A matching S is perfect if | S | = | M | = | W | = n. Key point. An unstable pair m–w could each improve partner by joint action. 1st 2nd 3rd 1st 2nd 3rd 1st 2nd 3rd 1st 2nd 3rd Xavier Amy Bertha Clare Amy Yancey Xavier Zeus Xavier Amy Bertha Clare Amy Yancey Xavier Zeus Yancey Bertha Amy Clare Bertha Xavier Yancey Zeus Yancey Bertha Amy Clare Bertha Xavier Yancey Zeus Zeus Amy Bertha Clare Clare Xavier Yancey Zeus Zeus Amy Bertha Clare Clare Xavier Yancey Zeus a perfect matching S = { X–C, Y–B, Z–A } Bertha and Xavier are an unstable pair 5 6 Stable matching problem Stable roommate problem Def. A stable matching is a perfect matching with no unstable pairs. Q. Do stable matchings always exist? A. Not obvious a priori. Stable matching problem. Given the preference lists of n men and n women, find a stable matching (if one exists). Stable roommate problem. ・Natural, desirable, and self-reinforcing condition. ・2 n people; each person ranks others from 1 to 2 n – 1. ・Individual self-interest prevents any man–woman pair from eloping. ・Assign roommate pairs so that no unstable pairs. 1st 2nd 3rd no perfect matching is stable Adam B C D A–B, C–D ⇒ B–C unstable Bob C A D A–C, B–D ⇒ A–B unstable 1st 2nd 3rd 1st 2nd 3rd Chris A B D A–D, B–C ⇒ A–C unstable Xavier Amy Bertha Clare Amy Yancey Xavier Zeus Doofus A B C Yancey Bertha Amy Clare Bertha Xavier Yancey Zeus Zeus Amy Bertha Clare Clare Xavier Yancey Zeus Observation. Stable matchings need not exist for stable roommate problem. a perfect matching S = { X–A, Y–B, Z–C } 7 8 Gale-Shapley deferred acceptance algorithm Proof of correctness: termination An intuitive method that guarantees to find a stable matching. Observation 1. Men propose to women in decreasing order of preference. GALE–SHAPLEY (preference lists for men and women) Observation 2. Once a woman is matched, she never becomes unmatched; ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ she only "trades up." INITIALIZE S to empty matching. WHILE (some man m is unmatched and hasn't proposed to every woman) Claim. Algorithm terminates after at most n 2 iterations of while loop. w ← first woman on m's list to whom m has not yet proposed. Pf. Each time through the while loop a man proposes to a new woman. IF (w is unmatched) There are only n 2 possible proposals. ▪ Add pair m–w to matching S. ELSE IF (w prefers m to her current partner m') Remove pair m'–w from matching S. 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Victor A B C D E Amy W X Y Z V Add pair m–w to matching S. Wyatt B C D A E Bertha X Y Z V W ELSE Xavier C D A B E Clare Y Z V W X w rejects m. Yancey D A B C E Diane Z V W X Y Zeus A B C D E Erika V W X Y Z RETURN stable matching S. n(n-1) + 1 proposals required ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 9 10 Proof of correctness: perfection Proof of correctness: stability Claim. In Gale-Shapley matching, all men and women get matched. Claim. In Gale-Shapley matching, there are no unstable pairs. Pf. [by contradiction] Pf. Suppose the GS matching S* does not contain the pair A–Z. ・Suppose, for sake of contradiction, that Zeus is not matched upon ・Case 1: Z never proposed to A. men propose in termination of GS algorithm. ⇒ Z prefers his GS partner B to A. decreasing order of preference ・Then some woman, say Amy, is not matched upon termination. ⇒ A–Z is stable. ・By Observation 2, Amy was never proposed to. ・Case 2: Z proposed to A. A – Y ・But, Zeus proposes to everyone, since he ends up unmatched. ▪ ⇒ A rejected Z (right away or later) B – Z ⇒ A prefers her GS partner Y to Z. women only trade up ⋮ ⇒ A–Z is stable. ・In either case, the pair A–Z is stable. ▪ Gale-Shapley matching S* 11 12 Summary Efficient implementation Stable matching problem. Given n men and n women, and their preferences, Efficient implementation. We describe an O(n 2) time implementation. find a stable matching if one exists. Representing men and women. Theorem. [Gale-Shapley 1962] The Gale-Shapley algorithm guarantees ・Assume men are named 1, …, n. to find a stable matching for any problem instance. ・Assume women are named 1', …, n'. Q. How to implement GS algorithm efficiently? Representing the matching. Q. If there are multiple stable matchings, which one does GS find? ・Maintain a list of free men (in a stack or queue). ・Maintain two arrays wife[m] and husband[w]. - if m matched to w, then wife[m] = w and husband[w] = m set entry to 0 if unmatched Men proposing. ・For each man, maintain a list of women, ordered by preference. ・For each man, maintain a pointer to woman in list for next proposal. 13 14 Efficient implementation (continued) Understanding the solution Women rejecting/accepting. For a given problem instance, there may be several stable matchings. ・Does woman w prefer man m to man m' ? ・Do all executions of GS algorithm yield the same stable matching? ・For each woman, create inverse of preference list of men. ・If so, which one? ・Constant time access for each query after O(n) preprocessing. 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th pref[] 8 3 7 1 4 5 6 2 woman prefers man 3 to 6 since inverse[3] < inverse[6] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 inverse[] 4th 8th 2nd 5th 6th 7th 3rd 1st 1st 2nd 3rd 1st 2nd 3rd for i = 1 to n Xavier Amy Bertha
Recommended publications
  • Stable Matching: Theory, Evidence, and Practical Design

    Stable Matching: Theory, Evidence, and Practical Design

    THE PRIZE IN ECONOMIC SCIENCES 2012 INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC Stable matching: Theory, evidence, and practical design This year’s Prize to Lloyd Shapley and Alvin Roth extends from abstract theory developed in the 1960s, over empirical work in the 1980s, to ongoing efforts to fnd practical solutions to real-world prob- lems. Examples include the assignment of new doctors to hospitals, students to schools, and human organs for transplant to recipients. Lloyd Shapley made the early theoretical contributions, which were unexpectedly adopted two decades later when Alvin Roth investigated the market for U.S. doctors. His fndings generated further analytical developments, as well as practical design of market institutions. Traditional economic analysis studies markets where prices adjust so that supply equals demand. Both theory and practice show that markets function well in many cases. But in some situations, the standard market mechanism encounters problems, and there are cases where prices cannot be used at all to allocate resources. For example, many schools and universities are prevented from charging tuition fees and, in the case of human organs for transplants, monetary payments are ruled out on ethical grounds. Yet, in these – and many other – cases, an allocation has to be made. How do such processes actually work, and when is the outcome efcient? Matching theory The Gale-Shapley algorithm Analysis of allocation mechanisms relies on a rather abstract idea. If rational people – who know their best interests and behave accordingly – simply engage in unrestricted mutual trade, then the outcome should be efcient. If it is not, some individuals would devise new trades that made them better of.
  • Matching with Externalities

    Matching with Externalities

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Pycia, Marek; Yenmez, M. Bumin Working Paper Matching with externalities Working Paper, No. 392 Provided in Cooperation with: Department of Economics, University of Zurich Suggested Citation: Pycia, Marek; Yenmez, M. Bumin (2021) : Matching with externalities, Working Paper, No. 392, University of Zurich, Department of Economics, Zurich, http://dx.doi.org/10.5167/uzh-204367 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/235605 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu University of Zurich Department of Economics Working Paper Series ISSN 1664-7041 (print) ISSN 1664-705X (online) Working Paper No. 392 Matching with Externalities Marek Pycia and M.
  • Kwanashie, Augustine (2015) Efficient Algorithms for Optimal Matching Problems Under Preferences

    Kwanashie, Augustine (2015) Efficient Algorithms for Optimal Matching Problems Under Preferences

    Kwanashie, Augustine (2015) Efficient algorithms for optimal matching problems under preferences. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/6706/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Efficient Algorithms for Optimal Matching Problems Under Preferences Augustine Kwanashie Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Computing Science College of Science and Engineering University of Glasgow September 2015 c Augustine Kwanashie 2015 Abstract In this thesis we consider efficient algorithms for matching problems involving pref- erences, i.e., problems where agents may be required to list other agents that they find acceptable in order of preference. In particular we mainly study the Stable Marriage problem (sm), the Hospitals / Residents problem (hr) and the Student / Project Allo- cation problem (spa), and some of their variants. In some of these problems the aim is to find a stable matching which is one that admits no blocking pair. A blocking pair with respect to a matching is a pair of agents that prefer to be matched to each other than their assigned partners in the matching if any.
  • Matching with Externalities

    Matching with Externalities

    Matching with Externalities Marek Pycia and M. Bumin Yenmez* June 2021 Abstract We incorporate externalities into the stable matching theory of two-sided markets. Ex- tending the classical substitutes condition to markets with externalities, we establish that stable matchings exist when agent choices satisfy substitutability. We show that substi- tutability is a necessary condition for the existence of a stable matching in a maximal- domain sense and provide a characterization of substitutable choice functions. In addition, we extend the standard insights of matching theory, like the existence of side-optimal sta- ble matchings and the deferred acceptance algorithm, to settings with externalities even though the standard fixed-point techniques do not apply. 1 Introduction Externalities are present in many two-sided markets. For instance, couples in a labor market pool their resources as do partners in legal or consulting partnerships. As a result, the pref- erences of an agent depend on the contracts signed by the partners. Likewise, a firm’s hiring *First online version: August 2, 2014; first presentation: February 2012. We would like to thank Peter Chen and Michael Egesdal for stimulating conversations early in the project. For their comments, we would also like to thank Omer Ali, Andrew Atkeson, David Dorn, Haydar Evren, James Fisher, Mikhail Freer, Andrea Gale- otti, Christian Hellwig, Jannik Hensel, George Mailath, Preston McAfee, SangMok Lee, Michael Ostrovsky, David Reiley, Michael Richter, Tayfun Sonmez, Alex Teytelboym, Utku Unver, Basit Zafar, Simpson Zhang, Josef Zweimüller, anonymous referees, and audiences of presentations at UCLA, Carnegie Mellon University, the University of Pennsylvania Workshop on Multiunit Allocation, AMMA, Arizona State University, Winter Econo- metric Society Meetings, Boston College, Princeton, CIREQ Montreal Microeconomic Theory Conference, and University of Zurich.
  • Seen As Stable Marriages

    Seen As Stable Marriages

    This paper was presented as part of the Mini-Conference at IEEE INFOCOM 2011 Seen As Stable Marriages Hong Xu, Baochun Li Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Toronto Abstract—In this paper, we advocate the use of stable matching agents from both sides to find the optimal solution, which is framework in solving networking problems, which are tradi- computationally expensive. tionally solved using utility-based optimization or game theory. Born in economics, stable matching efficiently resolves conflicts of interest among selfish agents in the market, with a simple and elegant procedure of deferred acceptance. We illustrate through (w1,w3,w2) (m1,m2,m3) one technical case study how it can be applied in practical m1 w1 scenarios where the impeding complexity of idiosyncratic factors makes defining a utility function difficult. Due to its use of (w2,w3,w1) (m1,m3,m2) generic preferences, stable matching has the potential to offer efficient and practical solutions to networking problems, while its m2 w2 mathematical structure and rich literature in economics provide many opportunities for theoretical studies. In closing, we discuss (w2,w1,w3) open questions when applying the stable matching framework. (m3,m2,m1) m3 w3 I. INTRODUCTION Matching is perhaps one of the most important functions of Fig. 1. A simple example of the marriage market. The matching shown is a stable matching. markets. The stable marriage problem, introduced by Gale and Shapley in their seminal work [1], is arguably one of the most Many large-scale networked systems, such as peer-to-peer interesting and successful abstractions of such markets.
  • Algorithms, Data Science, and Online Markets

    Algorithms, Data Science, and Online Markets

    Algorithms, Data Science, and Online Markets Stefano Leonardi Department of Computer, Control, and Management Engineering Antonio Ruberti (DIAG) Sapienza University of Rome September 2-6, 2019 Data Science Summer School - Pisa Algorithms, Data Science, and Markets September 5, 2019 1 / 83 Stefano Leonardi Leader of the Research Group on Algorithms and Data Science at DIAG - Sapienza ERC Advanced Grant "Algorithms and Mechanism Design Research in Online MArkets" (AMDROMA) Chair of the PhD program in Data Science at Sapienza Past Chair of the Master's Research Interests: Degree in Data Science at Algorithmic Theory Sapienza Algorithmic Data Analysis Fellow of the European Association for Theoretical Economics and Computation Computer Science Algorithms, Data Science, and Markets September 5, 2019 2 / 83 Outline 1 Part I: Algorithms, Data Science and Markets 2 Part II: Internet, Equilibria and Games 3 Part III: Games and solution concepts 4 Part IV: The complexity of finding equilibria 5 Part V: The price of Anarchy 6 Part VI: Equilibria in markets 7 Conclusions Algorithms, Data Science, and Markets September 5, 2019 3 / 83 Algorithms, Data Science, and Markets Digital markets form an important share of the global economy. Many classical markets moved to Internet: real-estate, stocks, e-commerce, entarteinment New markets with previously unknown features have emerged: web-based advertisement, viral marketing, digital goods, online labour markets, sharing economy Algorithms, Data Science, and Markets September 5, 2019 4 / 83 An Economy of Algorithms In 2000, we had 600 humans making markets in U.S. stocks. Today, we have two people and a lot of software. One in three Goldman Sachs employees are engineers R.
  • Matchingandmarketdesign

    Matchingandmarketdesign

    Matching and Market Design Theory and Practice Xiang Sun May 12, 2017 ii Contents Acknowledgement vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Matching and market design .......................................... 1 1.2 Time line of the main evolution of matching and market design ....................... 2 I Two-sided matching 9 2 Marriage 11 2.1 The formal model ............................................... 11 2.2 Stability and optimality ............................................ 12 2.3 Deferred acceptance algorithm ........................................ 14 2.4 Properties of stable matchings I ........................................ 16 2.5 Properties of stable matchings II ........................................ 21 2.6 Extension: Extending the men’s preferences ................................. 24 2.7 Extension: Adding another woman ...................................... 26 2.8 Incentive compatibility I ............................................ 29 2.9 Incentive compatibility II ........................................... 35 2.10 Non-bossiness ................................................. 38 3 College admissions 41 3.1 The formal model ............................................... 41 3.2 Stability ..................................................... 42 3.3 The connection between the college admissions model and the marriage model .............. 44 3.4 Deferred acceptance algorithm and properties of stable matchings ..................... 45 i Contents ii 3.5 Further results for the college admissions model ..............................
  • Coalition Manipulation of the Gale-Shapley Algorithm

    Coalition Manipulation of the Gale-Shapley Algorithm

    Coalition Manipulation of the Gale-Shapley Algorithm Weiran Shen and Pingzhong Tang Yuan Deng Institute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences Department of Computer Science Tsinghua University Duke University Beijing, China Durham, NC 27708, USA femersonswr,[email protected] [email protected] Abstract him yet. Then each woman rejects all men but her favorite one. The algorithm terminates when no man can make any It is well-known that the Gale-Shapley algorithm is not truth- proposal. ful for all agents. Previous studies in this category concentrate on manipulations using incomplete preference lists by a sin- It is shown that the matching computed by the Gale- gle woman and by the set of all women. Little is known about Shapley algorithm is stable and the algorithm is guaranteed manipulations by a subset of women. to terminate for each legal input, which immediately implies In this paper, we consider manipulations by any subset of that every instance of the stable matching problem has a sta- women with arbitrary preferences. We show that a strong ble matching. There are many interesting structural results in Nash equilibrium of the induced manipulation game always the literature of stable matching theory. For example, among exists among the manipulators and the equilibrium outcome all stable matchings, the matching computed by the Gale- is unique and Pareto-dominant. In addition, the set of match- Shapley algorithm is preferred by all men to other match- ings achievable by manipulations has a lattice structure. We ings, and thus is called the M-optimal (W-pessimal) match- also examine the super-strong Nash equilibrium in the end.
  • Unbalanced Random Matching Markets: the Stark Effect of Competition

    Unbalanced Random Matching Markets: the Stark Effect of Competition

    Unbalanced Random Matching Markets: The Stark Effect of Competition Itai Ashlagi Stanford University Yash Kanoria Columbia University Jacob D. Leshno Columbia University We study competition in matching markets with random heteroge- neous preferences and an unequal number of agents on either side. First, we show that even the slightest imbalance yields an essentially unique stable matching. Second, we give a tight description of stable outcomes, showing that matching markets are extremely competitive. Each agent on the short side of the market is matched with one of his top choices, and each agent on the long side either is unmatched or does almost no better than being matched with a random partner. Our results suggest that any matching market is likely to have a small core, explaining why small cores are empirically ubiquitous. I. Introduction Stable matching theory has been instrumental in the study and design of numerous two-sided markets. Two-sided markets are described by two dis- Part of the work was done when the last two authors were postdoctoral researchers at Microsoft Research New England. We thank Nittai Bergman, Gabriel Carroll, Yeon-Koo Che, Ben Golub, Uriel Feige, Ali Hortaçsu, Nicole Immorlica, Fuhito Kojima, SangMok Electronically published December 16, 2016 [ Journal of Political Economy, 2017, vol. 125, no. 1] © 2017 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 0022-3808/2017/12501-0005$10.00 69 70 journal of political economy joint sets of men and women, where each agent has preferences over po- tential partners. Examples include entry-level labor markets, dating, and college admissions. The core of a two-sided market is the set of stable matchings, where a matching is stable if there are no man and woman who both prefer each other over their assigned partners.
  • Diversity.Pdf

    Diversity.Pdf

    Published in the American Economic Review (2015) Vol. 105(8): 2679-94. doi:10.1257/aer.20130929 HOW TO CONTROL CONTROLLED SCHOOL CHOICE FEDERICO ECHENIQUE AND M. BUMIN YENMEZ Abstract. We characterize choice rules for schools that regard students as substitutes while expressing preferences for a diverse student body. The stable (or fair) assignment of students to schools requires the latter to re- gard the former as substitutes. Such a requirement is in conflict with the reality of schools' preferences for diversity. We show that the conflict can be useful, in the sense that certain unique rules emerge from imposing both considerations. We also provide welfare comparisons for students when different choice rules are employed. Date: October 22, 2014. Keywords: School choice, diversity, gross substitutes. We thank Estelle Cantillon, Lars Ehlers, Sean Horan, Mark Johnson, Juan Pereyra Barreiro, Ariel Rubinstein, Kota Saito, Yves Sprumont, and Utku Unver¨ for their helpful comments, as well as seminar audiences at multiple universities and conferences. We are particularly grateful to Scott Kominers, Parag Pathak and Tayfun S¨onmezfor their comments, and advise on existing controlled school choice programs. Karen Hannsberry, manager at the office of access and enrollment at Chicago Public Schools, very kindly answered all our questions about their program. Finally, we are very grateful to the editor, Debraj Ray, and three anonymous referees for their suggestions, which have led to a much improved version of the paper. Echenique is affiliated with the Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; Yenmez is with Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
  • Coalition Manipulation of Gale-Shapley Algorithm∗

    Coalition Manipulation of Gale-Shapley Algorithm∗

    The Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-18) Coalition Manipulation of Gale-Shapley Algorithm∗ Weiran Shen, Pingzhong Tang Yuan Deng Institute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences Department of Computer Science Tsinghua University Duke University Beijing, China Durham, NC 27708, USA {emersonswr,kenshinping}@gmail.com [email protected] Abstract women. At each round of the procedure, each man proposes to his favorite woman among those who have not rejected It is well-known that the Gale-Shapley algorithm is not truth- ful for all agents. Previous studies in this category concentrate him yet. Then each woman rejects all men but her favorite on manipulations using incomplete preference lists by a sin- one. The algorithm terminates when no man can make any gle woman and by the set of all women. Little is known about proposal. manipulations by a subset of women. It is shown that the matching computed by the Gale- In this paper, we consider manipulations by any subset of Shapley algorithm is stable and the algorithm is guaranteed women with arbitrary preferences. We show that a strong to terminate for each legal input, which immediately implies Nash equilibrium of the induced manipulation game always that every instance of the stable matching problem has a sta- exists among the manipulators and the equilibrium outcome ble matching. There are many interesting structural results in is unique and Pareto-dominant. In addition, the set of match- the literature of stable matching theory. For example, among ings achievable by manipulations has a lattice structure. We all stable matchings, the matching computed by the Gale- also examine the super-strong Nash equilibrium in the end.
  • The Complexity of Interactively Learning a Stable Matching by Trial and Error∗†

    The Complexity of Interactively Learning a Stable Matching by Trial and Error∗†

    The Complexity of Interactively Learning a Stable Matching by Trial and Error∗y Ehsan Emamjomeh-Zadehz Yannai A. Gonczarowskix David Kempe{ September 16, 2020 Abstract In a stable matching setting, we consider a query model that allows for an interactive learning algorithm to make precisely one type of query: proposing a matching, the response to which is either that the proposed matching is stable, or a blocking pair (chosen adversarially) indicating that this matching is unstable. For one-to-one matching markets, our main result is an essen- tially tight upper bound of O(n2 log n) on the deterministic query complexity of interactively learning a stable matching in this coarse query model, along with an efficient randomized algo- rithm that achieves this query complexity with high probability. For many-to-many matching markets in which participants have responsive preferences, we first give an interactive learning algorithm whose query complexity and running time are polynomial in the size of the market if the maximum quota of each agent is bounded; our main result for many-to-many markets is that the deterministic query complexity can be made polynomial (more specifically, O(n3 log n)) in the size of the market even for arbitrary (e.g., linear in the market size) quotas. 1 Introduction Problem and Background In the classic Stable Matching Problem (Gale and Shapley, 1962), there are n women and n men; each woman has a subset of men she deems acceptable and a strict preference order over them; similarly, each man has a subset of women he finds acceptable and a strict preference order over them.