DOCSLIB.ORG

Source Deuteronomistic History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Source Deuteronomistic History 647 Detective Story 648 ces built by Solomon which are located “east of Deuterocanonical Jerusalem, to the south of the Mount of Destruc- /Apocrypha, Apocryphal Writings tion” (cf. 1 Kgs 11 : 7). The topographic data clearly points to the Mount of Olives (Küchler: 790–97), which could also be designated as the Mount of Deutero-Isaiah Anointment (har hammišḥâ). Although the respec- /Isaiah (Book and Person) tive designation is first explicitly attested in the Mishnah (e.g., mRH 2:4; mMid 2 : 4), this does not necessarily exclude the possibility that it is already alluded to in 2 Kgs 23 : 13 (Cogan/Tadmor: 288; Deuteronomist (D) Source Sweeney: 449). In this case, the author of the verse /Deuteronomy, Book of; /Pentateuch (Torah); would have introduced the Mount of Destruction /Pentateuchal Criticism (har hammašḥît) as a play on words on har hammišḥâ in order to express his polemics against the cultic abominations practiced at the site (cf. Deut 4 : 16, Deuteronomistic History 25; 31 : 29; Judg 2 : 19 where the hipil of the root š– The book of Deuteronomy stands at the end of the ḥ–t is used in references to Israel’s worship of for- Torah (Pentateuch) in the canonical shaping of the eign deities and their idols). Alternatively, one HB/OT, but it also contains many links to other OT could also argue that the designation of the place books. In Moses’ final speech, the crossing of the as har hammišḥâ reflects a later tendency to avoid Jordan as well as the coming conquest of the land the negative connotations of the term har hammašḥît are repeatedly pointed at, though their stories are by changing the last consonant (Küchler: 791). Al- recorded in Joshua. Deuteronomy also contains al- though the case cannot be decided with any cer- lusions to the time of the Judges (compare Deut tainty, there can be no doubt about the fact that by 6 : 12–15 and Judg 2 : 12–14) and the monarchy (see referring to the Mount of Destruction, the author the law of the king in Deut 17). In addition, the of 2 Kgs 23 : 13 strongly polemicized against illegit- exile described at the end of 2 Kgs is already per- imate worship on the Mount of Olives. Additional ceivable in the curses of Deut 28. These close rela- evidence for the fact that these polemics reflect a tions between Deuteronomy and the Former Pro- certain historical reality is provided by 2 Sam phets had already led Spinoza to the theory that all 15 : 32. The verse mentions the “summit where these books (but also the books of Genesis–Num- God/Deities were worshipped” and thus indicates bers) are the work of one single editor who lived that the Mount of Olives may have enjoyed a long after the events of 587, and who wanted to produce history as a cultic site. an explanation for the fall of Judah with his histori- Bibliography: ■ Cogan, M./H. Tadmor, II Kings (Anchor Bi- cal account. At the beginning of the 19th century, ble 11; New York 1988). ■ Küchler, M., Jerusalem (Orte und W. M. L. de Wette was probably the first scholar to Landschaften der Bibel 4/2; Göttingen 2007). ■ Sweeney, explain the interrelation between Joshua–Kings M. A., I & II Kings (OTL; Louisville, Ky. 2007). and Deuteronomy with the concept of “Deuterono- Christoph Berner mistic (Dtr)” texts or editors. By identifying, as had been suggested before him, the book discovered in 2 Kgs 22 with the first edition of Deuteronomy, he Detective Story fostered the idea that “Deuteronomism” started in /Crime Fiction the time of King Josiah. H. Ewald, J. Wellhausen, and others, who identified Dtr texts in the Former Prophets, further developed this idea. Wellhausen Determinism presumes a first Dtr redaction in the time of Josiah, /Fate which is followed by exilic additions and revisions. 1. The discovery of the Deuteronomistic History (DtrH) by Martin Noth. In contrast to his prede- Deuel cessors, when M. Noth wrote his “History of Tradi- Deuel (MT Dĕûēl; LXX Ραγυηλ) is the father of tions” in 1943, he aimed to determine the function Eliasaph, a leader of the Israelite tribe of Gad dur- of Dtr texts in Deuteronomy and in the Former Pro- ing Israel’s wilderness journey (Num 1 : 14; 7 : 42, phets. He detected in these texts a unity in terms 47; 10 : 20). He was also called Reuel (MT Rĕûēl; of content and composition. They are the work of Num 2 : 14). The dual names were interpreted by an anonymous author, whom Noth called the “Deu- medieval Jewish commentators as encoding a spe- teronomist” (“Dtr”). The Dtr composed his work cial teaching. shortly after 560 BCE (the last event in 2 Kgs 25 Bibliography: ■ Ron, Z., “Eliasaph Ben-Deuel/Reuel: A can be dated to ~562), providing an etiology of the Rabbinic Interpretation,” JBQ 33 (2005) 191–95. collapse of Judah. By doing so, he provides the Daniel Stulac books of Deuteronomy–Kings with a “unified his- Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception vol.Thomas 6 Römer - 10.1515/ebr.deuteronomistichistory © Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/Boston,Downloaded 2013 from De Gruyter Online at 12/18/2020 04:53:41PM via Bibliotheque Universitaire de Lausanne 649 Deuteronomistic History 650 torical theology,” introducing explanation speeches Dtr YHWH-speech in Josh 1, v. 6 draws a first con- and comments into the course of the narration. In clusion. In vv. 7–9 there is an addition (also in Dtr this way, Dtr is the author of a complex tradition, style) that turns the military speech into an exhor- who for the first time conceives a thoroughgoing tation to obedience towards the Mosaic Law. This history of Israel and Judah from their Mosaic begin- brings Smend to the assumption of a later Dtr re- nings until the destruction of Jerusalem. The clos- dactor, whom he calls “DtrN,” a Dtr “nomist.” W. est relatives of Dtr are those historians of Hellenis- Dietrich added a “DtrP,” a prophetic Dtr, respon- tic and Roman times, who, using older and mostly sible for the insertion of the main prophetic histo- anonymous narrative material, wrote histories not ries in Kings and constructing a theory of prophetic of their own time but of more or less former times. announcement and fulfilment. The so-called Dtr writes his history to point out that the exile “model of Göttingen” (where Smend taught) is is a punishment from YHWH for the continuous therefore characterized by the distinction of three disobedience of his people and their kings. In doing Dtr layers: DtrH (the “historian”, responsible for so, he obviously saw the events of 597 and 587 as the first edition of DtrH, who writes during the ex- something irreversible and final. The hand and the ile), DtrP (a prophetic Deuteronomist, only found theology of Dtr can easily be detected in texts that in Samuel–Kings) and DtrN (a nomistic Dtr, who at Noth labelled “reflection-chapters” (esp. Josh 23; the end of the exilic or the beginning of the Persian Judg 2 : 11–3 : 6; 1 Sam 12; 1 Kgs 8; 2 Kgs 17), in period insists on the importance of the law). which Dtr has important personalities or himself This theory remains close to Noth’s ideas, be- holding speeches that provide interpretation for the cause it places the beginnings of DtrH in the exilic past and for coming events. These speeches also dis- period. Other scholars added more layers to this tinguish different periods of the Dtr History (Deut model, as for example “DtrS” (“spät-dtr”: late Dtr 1–Josh 23: Moses and the conquest; Judg 2–1 Sam texts; O. Kaiser) or DtrB (“Bundestheologischer 12: the time of the Judges; 1 Sam 12–1 Kgs 8: the Dtr”; Dtr texts focusing on the covenant; T. Vei- origins of monarchy; 1 Kgs 8–2 Kgs 17: the two jola). In regard to this multiplication of layers it is kingdoms; 2 Kgs 17–25: the last days of Judah). not clear whether their protagonists still presume a This theory was well received in scholarship, but coherent DtrH. soon underwent two major modifications. Dtr redactions were also detected in the Latter 2. A Josianic origin of the DtrH: The so-called Prophets, especially in Jeremiah (J. P. Hyatt, W. block-model. This model, which is dominant in Thiel) and Amos and Hosea (G. A. Yee, R. Albertz). Anglo-Saxon research, goes back to Frank Moore Yet it remained unclear how those redactions were Cross, who picks up an idea of Wellhausen and related to DtrH. The fact that there was a trend to others. Cross locates the first edition of the DtrH in discover Dtr redactions in almost every book of the the Josianic period, originally ending in 2 Kgs HB provoked criticism and the question how to de- 23 : 25. This edition was completed after ~587 by fine the term “Dtr” (L. S. Schearing–S. L. McKenzie). the addition of 2 Kgs 24–25. Cross bases his theory 4. The rejection of the theory. In the last few de- on the observation that two main themes character- cades, the theory of a DtrH has been increasingly ize the DtrH (in fact the books of Samuel–Kings): criticized, especially in European scholarship. The the sin of Jeroboam (1 Kgs 12), the first Northern opponents of Noth’s idea insist on the old observa- king who built YHWH sanctuaries outside Jerusa- tion that the Dtr texts in the different books of the lem (in Dan and Bethel) and the promise of an ever- Former Prophets are extremely different from one lasting Davidic dynasty in 2 Sam 7.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KHM Academic Jewish Studies
    Volume III, Issue 3 December 11, 2009/24 Kislev 5770 KOL HAMEVASER The Jewish Thought Magazine of the Yeshiva University Student Body Academic Interviews with, and Jewish Studies Articles by: Dr. David Berger, R. Dr. Richard Hidary, R. Dr. Joshua Berman, and Dr. Shawn-Zelig Aster p. 6, 8, 9, and 13 Jewish Responses to Wellhausen’s Docu- mentary Hypothesis AJ Berkovitz, p. 14 Tsiluta ke-Yoma de-Is- tana: Creating Clarity in the Beit Midrash Ilana Gadish, p. 18 Bible Study: Interpre- tation and Experience Ori Kanefsky, p. 19 Religious Authenticity and Historical Con- sciousness Eli Putterman on p. 20 Kol Hamevaser Contents Kol Hamevaser Volume III, Issue 3 The Student Thought Magazine of the Yeshiva December 11, 2009 24 Kislev 5770 University Student body Editorial Shlomo Zuckier 3 Academic Jewish Studies: Benefits and Staff Dangers Editors-in-Chief Letter-to-the-Editor Sarit Bendavid Shaul Seidler-Feller Mordechai Shichtman 5 Letter-to-the-Editors Associate Editor Academic Jewish Studies Shlomo Zuckier Staff 6 An Interview with Dr. David Berger Layout Editor Rabbi Dr. Richard Hidary 8 Traditional versus Academic Talmud Menachem Spira Study: “Hilkhakh Nimrinhu le-Tarvaihu” Editor Emeritus Shlomo Zuckier 9 An Interview with Rabbi Dr. Joshua Alex Ozar Berman Staff Writers Staff 13 An Interview with Dr. Shawn-Zelig Aster Yoni Brander Jake Friedman Abraham Jacob Berkovitz 14 Jewish Responses to Wellhausen’s Doc- Ilana Gadish umentary Hypothesis Nicole Grubner Nate Jaret Ilana Gadish 18 Tsiluta ke-Yoma de-Istana: Creating Clar- Ori Kanefsky ity in the Beit Midrash Alex Luxenberg Emmanuel Sanders Ori Kanefsky 19 Bible Study: Interpretation and Experi- Yossi Steinberger ence Jonathan Ziring Eli Putterman 20 Religious Authenticity and Historical Copy Editor Consciousness Benjamin Abramowitz Dovid Halpern 23 Not by Day and Not by Night: Jewish Webmaster Philosophy’s Place Reexamined Ben Kandel General Jewish Thought Cover Design Yehezkel Carl Nathaniel Jaret 24 Reality Check?: A Response to Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theory of the Deuteronomistic History and the Problem of the Book of Kings
    IN'IRODUCilON A HISTORY OF THE HISTORY: THE THEORY OF THE DEUTERONOMISTIC HISTORY AND THE PROBLEM OF THE BOOK OF KINGS The story of the theory of the Deuteronomistic History (DH)1 is itself a telling review (cf. Radjawane 1973; Weippert 1985). It begins with the great biblical scholar, Martin Noth, who established the theory of the DH in the field in the first half of a monograph published in 1943. That mono­ graph, with its inimitably German title, Oberlieferungsgeschichtliche Studien, has since become a classic in the study of the Hebrew Bible because it forever changed the way that scholars regard the "historical books" of the Bible. NOfH'S THEORY Noth proffered a new model in critical scholarship for the composition of biblical literature. Previously, scholars had tended to treat the Former Prophets (Joshua, Judges, Samuel, Kings) either as the continued compila­ tion of the literary sources in the Pentateuch or as independent units which had passed through one or more Deuteronomistic redactions. This was par­ ticularly true of the book of Kings. Before the appearance of Noth's ground­ breaking monograph, the most widely held view of Kings was that it was compiled first before the exile of 586 B.C.E. and then revised during the exile (Nelson 1981:14-19; Provan 1988:8-11). Noth posited that the Former Prophets, with the book of Deuteronomy at their head, were originally a unified history of Israel written by a single, ex­ ilic author/compiler whom Noth named the Deuteronomist (Dtr). Besides the similarity of language throughout the Former Prophets, Noth pointed to the common chronology and ideology of these books as evidence of an individual hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Deuteronomy Mcmaster Divinity College Fall 2016
    Deuteronomy McMaster Divinity College Fall 2016 Course Designation OT 3XD3 Specializations Biblical Studies Pastoral Studies Doctor of Practical Theology students who wish to apply for this course as an Advanced Elective for their degree program must consult with the Program Director of the DPT and the course instructor in order to develop an Advanced Elective approach to the course that fulfills the specific elements required by the DPT program. Once the elements of the Advanced Elective have been agreed upon by the student, the Program Director, and the instructor, a formal application can be made for an Advanced Elective in connection with this course. Once the application is accepted, DPT students can proceed with the course as part of their degree program. August H. Konkel (Ph.D.), Professor of Old Testament [email protected]; 905 525 9140 x 23505 mcmasterdivinity.ca/faculty/core/august-h-konkel 1 Course Schedule Time: Tuesdays, 7:00 – 9:00PM Course begins Tuesday Sept. 13 Reading WeeK October 11 Final WeeK Tuesday December 13 Course Description The booK of Deuteronomy is a covenant renewal for the nation about to enter the Promised Land. It shares the form of ancient covenants, particularly Hittite treaties of the second millennium. Its emphasis is to love and fear God, the qualities required of covenant loyalty. Loyalty to the covenant is manifest in both human and divine relationships specified in the covenant stipulations. The requirements of Deuteronomy become the measure by which the Kings of Israel are evaluated. This course will examine all these aspects of the conclusion of the Torah.
    [Show full text]
  • A Fresh Start Comes from God: Theological, Historical, and Sociological Background of the Clean-Slate Acts of Leviticus 25 and Deuteronomy 15
    A Fresh Start Comes from God: Theological, Historical, and Sociological Background of the Clean-Slate Acts of Leviticus 25 and Deuteronomy 15 Von der Theologischen Fakultät der Universität Leipzig angenommene D I S S E R T A T I O N zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades DOCTRIX PHILOSOPHIAE (Dr. phil.) vorgelegt von SandyJo Dorothea Rogers geboren am 15.08.1979 in Fort Huachuca, Arizona, the United States of America Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Schüle Dr. habil. Takayoshi Oshima Tag der Verteidigung: 11. Mai 2020 ii Selbständigkeitserklärung Hiermit erkläre ich, die vorliegende Dissertation selbständig und ohne unerlaubte fremde Hilfe angefertigt zu haben. Ich habe keine anderen als die im Schriftenverzeichnis angeführten Quellen benutzt und sämtliche Textstellen, die wörtlich oder sinngemäß aus veröffentlichten oder unveröffentlichten Schriften entnommen wurden, und alle Angaben, die auf mündlichen Auskünften beruhen, als solche kenntlich gemacht. Ebenfalls sind alle von anderen Personen bereitgestellten Materialien oder erbrachten Dienstleistungen als solche gekennzeichnet. I hereby declare that I have completed the present dissertation independently and without unauthorized assistance. I have not used any sources other than those listed in the bibliography and I have marked as such all passages of text taken literally or in spirit from published or unpublished writings and all information based on oral information. All materials or services provided by other persons are also marked as such. Leipzig, am 30.01.2020 SandyJo Dorothea Rogers Abstract The clean-slate acts of the Hebrew Bible, i.e., the Year of Jubilee in Leviticus 25 and the Šemittah Year and the Law of Slave Release in Deut 15:1-18, are a part of the tradition of clean-slate acts in the ancient Near East.
    [Show full text]
  • The Current Discussion on the So-Called Deuteronomistic History: Literary Criticism and Theological Consequences1)
    The Current Discussion on the so-called Deuteronomistic History: Literary Criticism and Theological Consequences1) Thomas C. Römer The key position of the book of Deuteronomy The book of Deuteronomy holds a particular position in the Hebrew Bible in that the report of the death of Moses in Deut 34 brings the Pentateuch to an important conclusion. The last verses in Deut 34:10-12 mark a major break by stating that never again a prophet like Moses arose in Israel, a prophet whom Yhwh knew face to face. To a certain extent the Pentateuch, the Torah appears to be a vita Mosis, since Exodus 2 opens the narration with his birth and Deuteronomy 34 ends the narration with his death, whereas the stories of the patriarchs and matriarchs in Genesis function as an introduction. Nevertheless, Deuteronomy points forward, as much as it marks an end, towards the following books. 1) This article is based on a paper given at the Tokyo Union Theological Seminary on May 9th 2014 during a stay for teaching at the International Christian University, Tokyo. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Professor Johannes Unsok Ro for his kind invitation and hospitality and to the assistants for their invitation to publish this paper in the journal Humanities: Christianity and Culture. The following is a summary of my former research on the Deuteronomistic History, especially “The Form-Critical Problem of the So- Called Deuteronomistic History” in The Changing Face of Form Criticim for the Twenty-First Century (ed. Marvin A. Sweeney and Ehud Ben Zvi; Grand Rapids, Michigan - Cambridge, UK: Eerdmans, 2003), 240-252; The So-Called Deuteronomistic History: A Sociological, Historical and Literary Introduction (London - New York: T & T Clark - Continuum, 2005; Japanese translation: Thomas Römer, Shinmeiki-shisho: Kyuyaku-seisho Ni Okeru Rekishisyo No Seiritsu [Tokyo: The Board of Publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Crown and Courts Materials
    David C. Flatto on The Crown and the Courts: Separation of Powers in the Early Jewish Im.agination Wednesday February 17, 2021 4 - 5 p.m. Online Register at law.fordham.edu/CrownAndCourts CLE COURSE MATERIALS Table of Contents 1. Speaker Biographies (view in document) 2. CLE Materials The Crown and the Courts: Separation of Powers in the Early Jewish Imagination Panel Discussion Cover, Robert M. THE FOLKTALES OF JUSTICE: TALES OF JURISDICTION (view in document) Cardozo Law Review. Levinson, Bernard M. THE FIRST CONSTITUTION: RETHINKING THE ORIGINS OF RULE OF LAW AND SEPARATION OF POWERS IN LIGHT OF DEUTERONOMY (view in document) Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities. Volume 20. Issue 1 Article 3. The King and I: The Separation of Powers in Early Hebraic Political Theory. (view in document) The Crown and the Courts: Separation of Powers in the Early Jewish Imagination Biographies Moderator: Ethan J. Leib is Professor of Law at Fordham Law School. He teaches in contracts, legislation, and regulation. His most recent book, Friend v. Friend: Friendships and What, If Anything, the Law Should Do About Them, explores the costs and benefits of the legal recognition of and sensitivity to friendship; it was published by Oxford University Press. Leib’s scholarly articles have recently appeared in the Yale Law Journal, Virginia Law Review, Georgetown Law Journal, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, University of Chicago Law Review, California Law Review, and elsewhere. He has also written for a broader audience in the New York Times, USA Today, Policy Review, Washington Post, New York Law Journal, The American Scholar, and The New Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Forsaken HBI Series on Jewish Women
    Forsaken HBI Series on Jewish Women Shulamit Reinharz, General Editor Sylvia Barack Fishman, Associate Editor Th e HBI Series on Jewish Women, created by the Hadassah-Brandeis Institute, publishes a wide range of books by and about Jewish women in diverse contexts and time periods. Of interest to scholars and the educated public, the HBI Series on Jewish Women fi lls major gaps in Jewish tudiesS and in Women and Gender Studies as well as their intersection. Th e HBI Series on Jewish Women is supported by a generous gift from Dr. Laura S. Schor. For the complete list of books that are available in this series, please see www.upne.com Sharon Faye Koren, Forsaken: Th e Menstruant in Medieval Jewish Mysticism Sonja M. Hedgepeth and Rochelle G. Saidel, editors, Sexual Violence against Jewish Women during the Holocaust Julia R. Lieberman, editor, Sephardi Family Life in the Early Modern Diaspora Derek Rubin, editor, Promised Lands: New Jewish American Fiction on Longing and Belonging Carol K. Ingall, editor, Th e Women Who Reconstructed American Jewish Education: 1910–1965 Gaby Brimmer and Elena Poniatowska, Gaby Brimmer: An Autobiography in Th ree Voices Harriet Hartman and Moshe Hartman, Gender and American Jews: Patt erns in Work, Education, and Family in Contemporary Life Dvora E. Weisberg, Levirate Marriage and the Family in Ancient Judaism Ellen M. Umansky and Dianne Ashton, editors, Four Centuries of Jewish Women’s Spirituality: A Sourcebook Carole S. Kessner, Marie Syrkin: Values Beyond the Self Ruth Kark, Margalit Shilo, and Galit Hasan-Rokem,
    [Show full text]
  • The Deuteronomist on Intermarriage
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by KnowledgeBank at OSU SEX, RELIGION, AND POLITICS: THE DEUTERONOMIST ON INTERMARRIAGE by Gary N. Knoppers The Pennsylvania State University Introduction The quotation of a legal traditum in I Kgs 11: 1-2 to criticize Solomon is a fascinating but problematic example of inner-biblical exegesis. 1 The author begins his portrayal of Solomon's decline by mentioning Solomon's love for foreign women - Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonians, Hittites, and the daughter of Pharaoh - "from the nations of which YHWH said to the Israelites: •you shall not have sexual relations with them nor shall they have sexual relations with you; truly, they will turn your heart after their gods."' 2 The censure seems straightforward: Solomon flounders because of his violation of an established divine command. But, upon close scrutiny, two major exegetical difficulties emerge. First, the text that the author of I Kgs 11 :2 quotes appears neither in the Pentateuch nor elsewhere in the Former Prophets. Second, only one of the nations appearing in the MT of 1 Kgs 11: 1-2 (the Hittites) actually appears in th~ Pentateuchal passages (Exod 34:11-16 and Deut 7: 1-4), which prohibit Israelites from intermarrying with any one of the native Canaanite nations. 3 The appearance of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, and Sidonians therefore seems surprising. 1 Kgs 11: 1-4 raises both exegetical and thematic issues. Mixed marriages, often considered to be a distinctly postexilic problem, are pivotal to Solomon's demise. To be sure, the Yahwist (Exod 34:11-16) and the I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deuteronomist on Intermarriage
    SEX, RELIGION, AND POLITICS: THE DEUTERONOMIST ON INTERMARRIAGE by Gary N. Knoppers The Pennsylvania State University Introduction The quotation of a legal traditum in I Kgs 11: 1-2 to criticize Solomon is a fascinating but problematic example of inner-biblical exegesis. 1 The author begins his portrayal of Solomon's decline by mentioning Solomon's love for foreign women - Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonians, Hittites, and the daughter of Pharaoh - "from the nations of which YHWH said to the Israelites: •you shall not have sexual relations with them nor shall they have sexual relations with you; truly, they will turn your heart after their gods."' 2 The censure seems straightforward: Solomon flounders because of his violation of an established divine command. But, upon close scrutiny, two major exegetical difficulties emerge. First, the text that the author of I Kgs 11 :2 quotes appears neither in the Pentateuch nor elsewhere in the Former Prophets. Second, only one of the nations appearing in the MT of 1 Kgs 11: 1-2 (the Hittites) actually appears in th~ Pentateuchal passages (Exod 34:11-16 and Deut 7: 1-4), which prohibit Israelites from intermarrying with any one of the native Canaanite nations. 3 The appearance of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, and Sidonians therefore seems surprising. 1 Kgs 11: 1-4 raises both exegetical and thematic issues. Mixed marriages, often considered to be a distinctly postexilic problem, are pivotal to Solomon's demise. To be sure, the Yahwist (Exod 34:11-16) and the I. In this essay I am basically following Knight's definition of traditum and traditio (1977, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discourse of Priestly Violence As Refracted Through the Zeal of Phinehas in the Hebrew Bible and in Jewish Literature
    Sacred Slaughter: The Discourse of Priestly Violence as Refracted Through the Zeal of Phinehas in the Hebrew Bible and in Jewish Literature The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Miller, Yonatan S. 2015. Sacred Slaughter: The Discourse of Priestly Violence as Refracted Through the Zeal of Phinehas in the Hebrew Bible and in Jewish Literature. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:23845464 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Sacred Slaughter: The Discourse of Priestly Violence as Refracted through the Zeal of Phinehas in the Hebrew Bible and in Jewish Literature A dissertation presented by Yonatan S. Miller to The Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts August 2015 © 2015 Yonatan S. Miller All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Professor Shaye Cohen Yonatan S. Miller Sacred Slaughter: The Discourse of Priestly Violence as Refracted through the Zeal of Phinehas in the Hebrew Bible and in Jewish Literature Abstract The story of Phinehas’ zealous slaying of an Israelite man and the Midianite woman with whom he dared consort in public (Numbers 25) is perhaps the most notorious of a number of famed pentateuchal narratives that are marked with vigilante violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua 6:15-21: Exploring the Deeper Meaning of the Herem
    Verbum Volume 4 Issue 1 Article 11 December 2006 Joshua 6:15-21: Exploring the Deeper Meaning of the Herem Mike Wegman St. John Fisher College Follow this and additional works at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum Part of the Religion Commons How has open access to Fisher Digital Publications benefited ou?y Recommended Citation Wegman, Mike (2006) "Joshua 6:15-21: Exploring the Deeper Meaning of the Herem," Verbum: Vol. 4 : Iss. 1 , Article 11. Available at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum/vol4/iss1/11 This document is posted at https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/verbum/vol4/iss1/11 and is brought to you for free and open access by Fisher Digital Publications at St. John Fisher College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Joshua 6:15-21: Exploring the Deeper Meaning of the Herem Abstract In lieu of an abstract, below is the essay's first paragraph. "In the Old Testament, there are a number of books that contain violent stories that may shock the casual reader. Some of these stories seem to encourage not only the slaughtering of enemy armies, but also the murder of innocent civilians. The book of Joshua, in particular, contains a number of such tales. In chapters six through eleven of this book, God instructs Joshua and his followers to obliterate dozens of enemy armies, and subsequently orders them to lay their towns to waste. Joshua and his followers put to death men, women, children, and livestock by the “edge of the sword.” Biblical scholars refer to this process of systematic destruction, in which all those who oppose the Lord are laid to waste, as the herem.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deuteronomistic History Hypothesis: a Reassessment
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 1989 The Deuteronomistic History Hypothesis: A Reassessment O’Brien, Mark A Abstract: This book undertakes a reassessment of the Deuteronomistic History in response to recent developments which raise questions about Martin Noth’s understanding of the history as a unified and well planned work. The reassessment is carried out via a literary critical, linguistic and contextual analysis of the text, in particular those passages which are generally regarded as Deuteronomistic compositions. The author argues that the history was indeed a well planned and unified work, but one that ended at2 Kgs 23:23 with the reign of Josiah. It was principally a story of Israel’s leaders and Moses and Joshua (Deuteronomy to Judg 2: 10), the period of Israel from the judges to the monarchy (Judg 2:11 to 1 Sam 11:15), and the period of Israel under the prophets and kings (1 Sam 13:1 to 2 Kgs 23:23). Subsequent redaction was carried out in three main stages. The first was a fairly straightforward updating of the history to stage accounted for the exile by applying the history’s critique of the northern kings to the Davidic dynasty. The third stage transferred its attention to the people and sought to transform the history from a story of Israel’s leaders into a story of the people’s failure to observe the law. Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-152171 Monograph Published Version Originally published at: O’Brien, Mark A (1989).
    [Show full text]