Large-Scale Trna Intron Transposition in The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Large-Scale Trna Intron Transposition in The Large-Scale tRNA Intron Transposition in the Archaeal Order Thermoproteales Represents a Novel Mechanism of Intron Gain Kosuke Fujishima,1,2 Junichi Sugahara,1,3 Masaru Tomita,1,2,3 and Akio Kanai*,1,2,3 1Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Keio University, Tsuruoka, Japan 2Department of Environmental Information, Keio University, Fujisawa, Japan 3Systems Biology Program, Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University, Fujisawa, Japan *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]. Associate editor: Martin Embley Abstract Research article Recently, diverse arrangements of transfer RNA (tRNA) genes have been found in the domain Archaea, in which the tRNA is interrupted by a maximum of three introns or is even fragmented into two or three genes. Whereas most of the eukaryotic tRNA introns are inserted strictly at the canonical nucleotide position (37/38), archaeal intron-containing tRNAs have a wide diversity of small tRNA introns, which differ in their numbers and locations. This feature is especially pronounced in the archaeal order Thermoproteales. In this study, we performed a comprehensive sequence comparison of 286 tRNA introns and their genes in seven Thermoproteales species to clarify how these introns have emerged and diversified during tRNA gene evolution. We identified 46 intron groups containing sets of highly similar sequences (.70%) and showed that 16 of them contain sequences from evolutionarily distinct tRNA genes. The phylogeny of these 16 intron groups indicates that transposition events have occurred at least seven times throughout the evolution of Thermoproteales. These findings suggest that frequent intron transposition occurs among the tRNA genes of Thermoproteales. Further computational analysis revealed limited insertion positions and corresponding amino acid types of tRNA genes. This has arisen because the bulge–helix–bulge splicing motif is required at the newly transposed position if the pre-tRNA is to be correctly processed. These results clearly demonstrate a newly identified mechanism that facilitates the late gain of short introns at various noncanonical positions in archaeal tRNAs. Key words: Archaea, tRNA intron, transposition, Thermoproteales. Introduction tions within a single tRNA gene (Kawach et al. 2005; Soma et al. 2007; Maruyama et al. 2009). Transfer RNA (tRNA) is a universally conserved essential Similarly, archaeal species have one of three types of ho- molecule that decodes genetic information during protein mologous tRNA splicing endonucleases (homodimeric, ho- biosynthesis. tRNA introns are found in all three domains motetrameric, or heterotetrameric), which recognize an of life (bacteria, Archaea, and Eukarya), representing the exon–intron junction characterized by the bulge–helix– most common disruption of the host tRNA genes. How- ever, their splicing mechanisms and locations in the tRNA bulge (BHB) motif (Diener and Moore 1998; Xue, Calvin, genes of the three biological domains differ. Bacterial tRNA and Li 2006). Archaeal species expressing the heterotetra- introns are known to be self-splicing group I introns and are meric splicing endonuclease tend to have increased pro- located in the anticodon loop of the tRNA genes of the a-, portions of tRNA introns inserted at noncanonical b-, and c-Proteobacteria (Reinhold-Hurek and Shub 1992). positions (other than 37/38) compared with the archaeal In contrast, the tRNA introns of the Archaea and Eukarya species that express the other types of endonucleases. Spe- are processed by the specific enzymatic reactions of tRNA cies belonging to the thermoacidophilic order Thermopro- splicing endonucleases. Eukaryotic tRNA introns are pre- teales display a particularly elevated proportion of tRNA dominantly inserted at canonical position 37/38, a univer- introns at noncanonical sites, which are found at over sally conserved tRNA intron insertion position in Archaea 30 nucleotide positions within various tRNA genes and Eukarya, and are removed by the heterotetrameric eu- (Sugahara et al. 2008). Unusual tRNA genes that contain karyotic splicing endonucleases of the Sen family, based on three introns are currently known in only three species, a measuring system that recognizes the distance between Thermofilum pendens, Pyrobaculum calidifontis, and P. is- the mature domain and the splice sites (Li et al. 1998). landicum, all members of the Thermoproteales. However, A few exceptions occur in the nuclear genomes of the numbers of intron-containing tRNA genes do not fol- photosynthetic eukaryotes and the nucleomorph, the low the phylogenetic trends of the Thermoproteales spe- endosymbiont-derived eukaryotic nucleus found in certain cies, which suggests an active gain and loss of tRNA introns plastids, in which 1–3 introns are located at various loca- within this order (Sugahara et al. 2009). © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected] Mol. Biol. Evol. 27(10):2233–2243. 2010 doi:10.1093/molbev/msq111 Advance Access publication April 29, 2010 2233 Fujishima et al. · doi:10.1093/molbev/msq111 MBE Several models have been proposed for the gain and loss 70%. Transposable introns were further extracted by man- of spliceosomal introns in eukaryotes. For example, reverse ually investigating each tRNA intron groups to see whether transcription and recombination of the spliced RNA could it satisfied either of the following criteria: 1) the introns lead to intron loss, whereas reverse splicing, the insertion of belong to more than two evolutionarily distinct tRNA transposable elements, and gene duplication could result in genes (e.g., tRNAThr and tRNAVal), or 2) the introns are lo- intron gain (Roy and Gilbert 2006). In contrast, the origin cated at more than two different nucleotide positions. The and evolution of tRNA introns are poorly understood. same criteria were also applied to 217 tRNA introns from Therefore, whether the models proposed for the spliceoso- 12 crenarchaeal species: Aeropyrum pernix, Cenarchaeum mal introns can also be applied to the enzymatically symbiosum, Desulfurococcus kamchatkensis, Hyperthermus cleaved tRNA introns remains a major question. A unique butyricus, Ignicoccus hospitalis, Metallosphaera sedula, type of disrupted tRNA, the so-called ‘‘split tRNA’’ (tRNA Staphylothermus marinus, Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, Su. is- encoded on two or three separate minigenes), has recently landicus L.S.2.15, Su. islandicus M.14.25, Su. solfataricus, and been discovered in two hyperthermophilic Archaea, Nano- Su. tokodaii. archaeum equitans and Caldivirga maquilingensis (Randau et al. 2005; Fujishima et al. 2009). Our recent studies have Construction of a Phylogenetic Tree of tRNAs shown that the precursor sequences of these split tRNAs A multiple sequence alignment of the tRNAs was con- have high sequence similarity to the tRNA intron sequen- structed by masking all the tRNA intron sequences to con- ces in related archaeal species (Fujishima et al. 2008, 2009). sider the phylogeny of the mature tRNA sequences. All the This finding clearly suggests an evolutionary relationship mature tRNA sequences (input as tDNA sequences) were between the two types of tRNA genes, although the tran- aligned using ClustalW 2.0 (Larkin et al. 2007). The aligned sition state between the two is unknown. One explanation tRNA sequences (.aln file) were manually improved by is that the tRNA intron is a remnant of the residual leader matching the consensus nucleotides conserved among sequence produced during the trans splicing of the split the archaeal tRNAs: base 8 (T or C), bases 14–15 (AG), ba- tRNA gene (‘‘split-early’’ hypothesis; Di Giulio 2006, ses 18–19 (GG), base 21 (A or G), base 33 (T), base 48 (T or 2008). An alternative explanation is that the insertion of C), bases 53–58 (GTTC[A/G]A), bases 60–61 (TC), and base the intron occurred first and the gene subsequently under- 72 (T or C) (Marck and Grosjean 2002) to generate a struc- went fragmentation at the site of insertion (‘‘split-late’’ hy- tural alignment. An unrooted neighbor-joining tree was pothesis; Randau and Soll 2008; Heinemann et al. 2009). constructed using ClustalW 2.0 and was visualized with In this study, we performed a comprehensive sequence iToL (Letunic and Bork 2007). analysis of all the tRNA intron sequences in seven members of the Thermoproteales and characterized the sets of ‘‘in- In Silico Splicing Analysis tron groups’’ with similar sequences. Approximately one- The intron sequences belonging to the tRNAs listed in third of the groups contained introns from evolutionarily table 2 were computationally inserted into every nucleo- distinct tRNA genes, which we defined as the ‘‘transposable tide position (from 1/2 to 72/73) of the original tRNA se- intron’’ group. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that these quence, and into the same nucleotide position in the groups originated at various times during the evolution mature tRNAs with different isoacceptors derived from of the Thermoproteales and have contributed to the late the same species, to produce two types of artificial intron- gain of introns in the tRNA genes. This new phenomenon is containing tRNAs (supplementary fig. S1, Supplementary inconsistent with any of the known theories of intron gain. Material online). To correctly predict the strict/relaxed It also has important implications for the origin and evo- BHB motif, an extra 20-nt pre-tRNA 5# leader sequence
Recommended publications
  • Diversity of Understudied Archaeal and Bacterial Populations of Yellowstone National Park: from Genes to Genomes Daniel Colman
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Biology ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 7-1-2015 Diversity of understudied archaeal and bacterial populations of Yellowstone National Park: from genes to genomes Daniel Colman Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/biol_etds Recommended Citation Colman, Daniel. "Diversity of understudied archaeal and bacterial populations of Yellowstone National Park: from genes to genomes." (2015). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/biol_etds/18 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Daniel Robert Colman Candidate Biology Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Cristina Takacs-Vesbach , Chairperson Robert Sinsabaugh Laura Crossey Diana Northup i Diversity of understudied archaeal and bacterial populations from Yellowstone National Park: from genes to genomes by Daniel Robert Colman B.S. Biology, University of New Mexico, 2009 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Biology The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico July 2015 ii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this dissertation to my late grandfather, Kenneth Leo Colman, associate professor of Animal Science in the Wool laboratory at Montana State University, who even very near the end of his earthly tenure, thought it pertinent to quiz my knowledge of oxidized nitrogen compounds. He was a man of great curiosity about the natural world, and to whom I owe an acknowledgement for his legacy of intellectual (and actual) wanderlust.
    [Show full text]
  • Marsarchaeota Are an Aerobic Archaeal Lineage Abundant in Geothermal Iron Oxide Microbial Mats
    Marsarchaeota are an aerobic archaeal lineage abundant in geothermal iron oxide microbial mats Authors: Zackary J. Jay, Jacob P. Beam, Mansur Dlakic, Douglas B. Rusch, Mark A. Kozubal, and William P. Inskeep This is a postprint of an article that originally appeared in Nature Microbiology on May 14, 2018. The final version can be found at https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41564-018-0163-1. Jay, Zackary J. , Jacob P. Beam, Mensur Dlakic, Douglas B. Rusch, Mark A. Kozubal, and William P. Inskeep. "Marsarchaeota are an aerobic archaeal lineage abundant in geothermal iron oxide microbial mats." Nature Microbiology 3, no. 6 (May 2018): 732-740. DOI: 10.1038/ s41564-018-0163-1. Made available through Montana State University’s ScholarWorks scholarworks.montana.edu Marsarchaeota are an aerobic archaeal lineage abundant in geothermal iron oxide microbial mats Zackary J. Jay1,4,7, Jacob P. Beam1,5,7, Mensur Dlakić2, Douglas B. Rusch3, Mark A. Kozubal1,6 and William P. Inskeep 1* The discovery of archaeal lineages is critical to our understanding of the universal tree of life and evolutionary history of the Earth. Geochemically diverse thermal environments in Yellowstone National Park provide unprecedented opportunities for studying archaea in habitats that may represent analogues of early Earth. Here, we report the discovery and character- ization of a phylum-level archaeal lineage proposed and herein referred to as the ‘Marsarchaeota’, after the red planet. The Marsarchaeota contains at least two major subgroups prevalent in acidic, microaerobic geothermal Fe(III) oxide microbial mats across a temperature range from ~50–80 °C. Metagenomics, single-cell sequencing, enrichment culturing and in situ transcrip- tional analyses reveal their biogeochemical role as facultative aerobic chemoorganotrophs that may also mediate the reduction of Fe(III).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetics of Archaeal Lipids Amy Kelly 9/27/2006 Outline
    Phylogenetics of Archaeal Lipids Amy Kelly 9/27/2006 Outline • Phlogenetics of Archaea • Phlogenetics of archaeal lipids • Papers Phyla • Two? main phyla – Euryarchaeota • Methanogens • Extreme halophiles • Extreme thermophiles • Sulfate-reducing – Crenarchaeota • Extreme thermophiles – Korarchaeota? • Hyperthermophiles • indicated only by environmental DNA sequences – Nanoarchaeum? • N. equitans a fast evolving euryarchaeal lineage, not novel, early diverging archaeal phylum – Ancient archael group? • In deepest brances of Crenarchaea? Euryarchaea? Archaeal Lipids • Methanogens – Di- and tetra-ethers of glycerol and isoprenoid alcohols – Core mostly archaeol or caldarchaeol – Core sometimes sn-2- or Images removed due to sn-3-hydroxyarchaeol or copyright considerations. macrocyclic archaeol –PMI • Halophiles – Similar to methanogens – Exclusively synthesize bacterioruberin • Marine Crenarchaea Depositional Archaeal Lipids Biological Origin Environment Crocetane methanotrophs? methane seeps? methanogens, PMI (2,6,10,15,19-pentamethylicosane) methanotrophs hypersaline, anoxic Squalane hypersaline? C31-C40 head-to-head isoprenoids Smit & Mushegian • “Lost” enzymes of MVA pathway must exist – Phosphomevalonate kinase (PMK) – Diphosphomevalonate decarboxylase – Isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase (IPPI) Kaneda et al. 2001 Rohdich et al. 2001 Boucher et al. • Isoprenoid biosynthesis of archaea evolved through a combination of processes – Co-option of ancestral enzymes – Modification of enzymatic specificity – Orthologous and non-orthologous gene
    [Show full text]
  • Displacement of the Canonical Single-Stranded DNA-Binding Protein in the Thermoproteales
    Displacement of the canonical single-stranded DNA-binding protein in the Thermoproteales Sonia Paytubia,1,2, Stephen A. McMahona,2, Shirley Grahama, Huanting Liua, Catherine H. Bottinga, Kira S. Makarovab, Eugene V. Kooninb, James H. Naismitha,3, and Malcolm F. Whitea,3 aBiomedical Sciences Research Complex, University of St Andrews, Fife KY16 9ST, United Kingdom; and bNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894 AUTHOR SUMMARY Proteins are the major structural and biochemical route involved direct puri- operational components of cells. Even fication and identification of proteins the simplest organisms possess hundreds thatcouldbindtossDNAinoneofthe of different proteins, and more complex Thermoproteales, Thermoproteus tenax. organisms typically have many thou- This approach resulted in the identifi- sands. Because all living beings, from cation of the product of the gene ttx1576 microbes to humans, are related by as a candidate for the missing SSB. evolution, they share a core set of pro- We proceeded to characterize the teins in common. Proteins perform properties of the Ttx1576 protein, (which fundamental roles in key metabolic we renamed “ThermoDBP” for Ther- processes and in the processing of in- moproteales DNA-binding protein), formation from DNA via RNA to pro- showing that it has all the biochemical teins. A notable example is the ssDNA- properties consistent with a role as a binding protein, SSB, which is essential functional SSB, including a clear prefer- for DNA replication and repair and is ence for ssDNA binding and low se- widely considered to be one of the quence specificity. Using crystallographic few core universal proteins shared by analysis, we solved the structure of the alllifeforms.Herewedemonstrate Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology of Eukaryotic DNA Replication
    Downloaded from http://cshperspectives.cshlp.org/ on September 25, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Archaeology of Eukaryotic DNA Replication Kira S. Makarova and Eugene V. Koonin National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20894 Correspondence: [email protected] Recent advances in the characterization of the archaeal DNA replication system together with comparative genomic analysis have led to the identification of several previously un- characterized archaeal proteins involved in replication and currently reveal a nearly com- plete correspondence between the components of the archaeal and eukaryotic replication machineries. It can be inferred that the archaeal ancestor of eukaryotes and even the last common ancestor of all extant archaea possessed replication machineries that were compa- rable in complexity to the eukaryotic replication system. The eukaryotic replication system encompasses multiple paralogs of ancestral components such that heteromeric complexes in eukaryotes replace archaeal homomeric complexes, apparently along with subfunctionali- zation of the eukaryotic complex subunits. In the archaea, parallel, lineage-specific dupli- cations of many genes encoding replication machinery components are detectable as well; most of these archaeal paralogs remain to be functionally characterized. The archaeal rep- lication system shows remarkable plasticity whereby even some essential components such as DNA polymerase and single-stranded DNA-binding protein are displaced by unrelated proteins with analogous activities in some lineages. ouble-stranded DNA is the molecule that Okazaki fragments (Kornberg and Baker 2005; Dcarries genetic information in all cellular Barry and Bell 2006; Hamdan and Richardson life-forms; thus, replication of this genetic ma- 2009; Hamdan and van Oijen 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Carbon Fixation Pathways Through a Quantitative Lens
    Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 2325–2342, 2012 doi:10.1093/jxb/err417 Advance Access publication 26 December, 2011 REVIEW PAPER A survey of carbon fixation pathways through a quantitative lens Arren Bar-Even, Elad Noor and Ron Milo* Department of Plant Sciences, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] Received 15 August 2011; Revised 4 November 2011; Accepted 8 November 2011 Downloaded from Abstract While the reductive pentose phosphate cycle is responsible for the fixation of most of the carbon in the biosphere, it http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/ has several natural substitutes. In fact, due to the characterization of three new carbon fixation pathways in the last decade, the diversity of known metabolic solutions for autotrophic growth has doubled. In this review, the different pathways are analysed and compared according to various criteria, trying to connect each of the different metabolic alternatives to suitable environments or metabolic goals. The different roles of carbon fixation are discussed; in addition to sustaining autotrophic growth it can also be used for energy conservation and as an electron sink for the recycling of reduced electron carriers. Our main focus in this review is on thermodynamic and kinetic aspects, including thermodynamically challenging reactions, the ATP requirement of each pathway, energetic constraints on carbon fixation, and factors that are expected to limit the rate of the pathways. Finally, possible metabolic structures at Weizmann Institute of Science on July 3, 2016 of yet unknown carbon fixation pathways are suggested and discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaea and the Origin of Eukaryotes
    REVIEWS Archaea and the origin of eukaryotes Laura Eme, Anja Spang, Jonathan Lombard, Courtney W. Stairs and Thijs J. G. Ettema Abstract | Woese and Fox’s 1977 paper on the discovery of the Archaea triggered a revolution in the field of evolutionary biology by showing that life was divided into not only prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Rather, they revealed that prokaryotes comprise two distinct types of organisms, the Bacteria and the Archaea. In subsequent years, molecular phylogenetic analyses indicated that eukaryotes and the Archaea represent sister groups in the tree of life. During the genomic era, it became evident that eukaryotic cells possess a mixture of archaeal and bacterial features in addition to eukaryotic-specific features. Although it has been generally accepted for some time that mitochondria descend from endosymbiotic alphaproteobacteria, the precise evolutionary relationship between eukaryotes and archaea has continued to be a subject of debate. In this Review, we outline a brief history of the changing shape of the tree of life and examine how the recent discovery of a myriad of diverse archaeal lineages has changed our understanding of the evolutionary relationships between the three domains of life and the origin of eukaryotes. Furthermore, we revisit central questions regarding the process of eukaryogenesis and discuss what can currently be inferred about the evolutionary transition from the first to the last eukaryotic common ancestor. Sister groups Two descendants that split The pioneering work by Carl Woese and colleagues In this Review, we discuss how culture- independent from the same node; the revealed that all cellular life could be divided into three genomics has transformed our understanding of descendants are each other’s major evolutionary lines (also called domains): the archaeal diversity and how this has influenced our closest relative.
    [Show full text]
  • Variations in the Two Last Steps of the Purine Biosynthetic Pathway in Prokaryotes
    GBE Different Ways of Doing the Same: Variations in the Two Last Steps of the Purine Biosynthetic Pathway in Prokaryotes Dennifier Costa Brandao~ Cruz1, Lenon Lima Santana1, Alexandre Siqueira Guedes2, Jorge Teodoro de Souza3,*, and Phellippe Arthur Santos Marbach1,* 1CCAAB, Biological Sciences, Recoˆ ncavo da Bahia Federal University, Cruz das Almas, Bahia, Brazil 2Agronomy School, Federal University of Goias, Goiania,^ Goias, Brazil 3 Department of Phytopathology, Federal University of Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article/11/4/1235/5345563 by guest on 27 September 2021 *Corresponding authors: E-mails: [email protected]fla.br; [email protected]. Accepted: February 16, 2019 Abstract The last two steps of the purine biosynthetic pathway may be catalyzed by different enzymes in prokaryotes. The genes that encode these enzymes include homologs of purH, purP, purO and those encoding the AICARFT and IMPCH domains of PurH, here named purV and purJ, respectively. In Bacteria, these reactions are mainly catalyzed by the domains AICARFT and IMPCH of PurH. In Archaea, these reactions may be carried out by PurH and also by PurP and PurO, both considered signatures of this domain and analogous to the AICARFT and IMPCH domains of PurH, respectively. These genes were searched for in 1,403 completely sequenced prokaryotic genomes publicly available. Our analyses revealed taxonomic patterns for the distribution of these genes and anticorrelations in their occurrence. The analyses of bacterial genomes revealed the existence of genes coding for PurV, PurJ, and PurO, which may no longer be considered signatures of the domain Archaea. Although highly divergent, the PurOs of Archaea and Bacteria show a high level of conservation in the amino acids of the active sites of the protein, allowing us to infer that these enzymes are analogs.
    [Show full text]
  • Methanocaldococcus Jannaschii Mja Methanococci Methanococcales
    Table S2 List of the archaeal species used for evaluation of physiological and metabolic potential by MAPLE system Species Species ID Class Order [Euryarchaeota: 53 species] Methanocaldococcus jannaschii mja Methanococci Methanococcales Methanotorris igneus mig Methanococci Methanococcales Methanococcus vannielii mvn Methanococci Methanococcales Methanothermococcus okinawensis mok Methanococci Methanococcales Methanosarcina barkeri mba Methanomicrobia Methanosarcinales Methanococcoides burtonii mbu Methanomicrobia Methanosarcinales Methanohalophilus mahii mmh Methanomicrobia Methanosarcinales Methanohalobium evestigatum mev Methanomicrobia Methanosarcinales Methanosalsum zhilinae mzh Methanomicrobia Methanosarcinales Methanolobus psychrophilus mpy Methanomicrobia Methanosarcinales Methanomethylovorans hollandica mhz Methanomicrobia Methanosarcinales Methanosaeta concilii mcj Methanomicrobia Methanosarcinales Methanospirillum hungatei mhu Methanomicrobia Methanomicrobiales Methanocorpusculum labreanum mla Methanomicrobia Methanomicrobiales Methanoculleus bourgensis mbg Methanomicrobia Methanomicrobiales Methanoplanus petrolearius mpi Methanomicrobia Methanomicrobiales Methanoregula boonei mbn Methanomicrobia Methanomicrobiales Candidatus Methanosphaerula palustris mpl Methanomicrobia Methanomicrobiales Methanocella paludicola mpd Methanomicrobia Methanocellales Methanomassiliicoccus sp. Mx1-Issoire mer Methanomicrobia Unclassified Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus mth Methanobacteria Methanobacteriales Methanosphaera stadtmanae mst
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Based Molecular Markers Provide Reliable Means to Understand Prokaryotic Phylogeny and Support Darwinian Mode of Evolution
    REVIEW ARTICLE published: 26 July 2012 CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00098 Protein based molecular markers provide reliable means to understand prokaryotic phylogeny and support Darwinian mode of evolution Vaibhav Bhandari , Hafiz S. Naushad and Radhey S. Gupta* Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada Edited by: The analyses of genome sequences have led to the proposal that lateral gene transfers Yousef Abu Kwaik, University of (LGTs) among prokaryotes are so widespread that they disguise the interrelationships Louisville School of Medicine, USA among these organisms. This has led to questioning of whether the Darwinian model Reviewed by: of evolution is applicable to prokaryotic organisms. In this review, we discuss the Srinand Sreevastan, University of Minnesota, USA usefulness of taxon-specific molecular markers such as conserved signature indels (CSIs) Andrey P.Anisimov, State Research and conserved signature proteins (CSPs) for understanding the evolutionary relationships Center for Applied Microbiology and among prokaryotes and to assess the influence of LGTs on prokaryotic evolution. The Biotechnology, Russia analyses of genomic sequences have identified large numbers of CSIs and CSPs that are *Correspondence: unique properties of different groups of prokaryotes ranging from phylum to genus levels. Radhey S. Gupta, Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical The species distribution patterns of these molecular signatures strongly support a tree-like Sciences, McMaster University, vertical inheritance of the genes containing these molecular signatures that is consistent 1200 Main Street West, Health with phylogenetic trees. Recent detailed studies in this regard on the Thermotogae and Sciences Center, Hamilton, Archaea, which are reviewed here, have identified large numbers of CSIs and CSPs that ON L8N 3Z5, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Genomic Analysis of The
    de Crécy-Lagard et al. Biology Direct 2012, 7:32 http://www.biology-direct.com/content/7/1/32 RESEARCH Open Access Comparative genomic analysis of the DUF71/ COG2102 family predicts roles in diphthamide biosynthesis and B12 salvage Valérie de Crécy-Lagard1*, Farhad Forouhar2, Céline Brochier-Armanet3, Liang Tong2 and John F Hunt2 Abstract Background: The availability of over 3000 published genome sequences has enabled the use of comparative genomic approaches to drive the biological function discovery process. Classically, one used to link gene with function by genetic or biochemical approaches, a lengthy process that often took years. Phylogenetic distribution profiles, physical clustering, gene fusion, co-expression profiles, structural information and other genomic or post-genomic derived associations can be now used to make very strong functional hypotheses. Here, we illustrate this shift with the analysis of the DUF71/COG2102 family, a subgroup of the PP-loop ATPase family. Results: The DUF71 family contains at least two subfamilies, one of which was predicted to be the missing diphthine-ammonia ligase (EC 6.3.1.14), Dph6. This enzyme catalyzes the last ATP-dependent step in the synthesis of diphthamide, a complex modification of Elongation Factor 2 that can be ADP-ribosylated by bacterial toxins. Dph6 orthologs are found in nearly all sequenced Archaea and Eucarya, as expected from the distribution of the diphthamide modification. The DUF71 family appears to have originated in the Archaea/Eucarya ancestor and to have been subsequently horizontally transferred to Bacteria. Bacterial DUF71 members likely acquired a different function because the diphthamide modification is absent in this Domain of Life.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity, Ecology and Evolution of Archaea
    REVIEW ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-0715-z Diversity, ecology and evolution of Archaea Brett J. Baker 1 ✉ , Valerie De Anda1, Kiley W. Seitz1, Nina Dombrowski 1, Alyson E. Santoro2 and Karen G. Lloyd 3 Compared to bacteria, our knowledge of archaeal biology is limited. Historically, microbiologists have mostly relied on cultur- ing and single-gene diversity surveys to understand Archaea in nature. However, only six of the 27 currently proposed archaeal phyla have cultured representatives. Advances in genomic sequencing and computational approaches are revolutionizing our understanding of Archaea. The recovery of genomes belonging to uncultured groups from the environment has resulted in the description of several new phyla, many of which are globally distributed and are among the predominant organisms on the planet. In this Review, we discuss how these genomes, together with long-term enrichment studies and elegant in situ measurements, are providing insights into the metabolic capabilities of the Archaea. We also debate how such studies reveal how important Archaea are in mediating an array of ecological processes, including global carbon and nutrient cycles, and how this increase in archaeal diversity has expanded our view of the tree of life and early archaeal evolution, and has provided new insights into the origin of eukaryotes. nitially, all single-celled, non-eukaryotic microorganisms were 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed many deeply branching classified as the ‘Prokaryota’1 and, later, the ‘Monera’2. These groups19. This uncultivated diversity is commonly referred to as Iearly classifications lumped Bacteria and Archaea into a single ‘microbial dark matter’. group based primarily on morphology.
    [Show full text]